Next Article in Journal
Applying Event-Related Potentials to Measure Perceptual Experience toward the Navigation Interface of a Mobile Game for Improving the Design
Next Article in Special Issue
On r-Central Incomplete and Complete Bell Polynomials
Previous Article in Journal
Ellipse Coefficient Map-Based Geomagnetic Fingerprint Considering Azimuth Angles
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Power Sums Involving Fibonacci Polynomials and Their Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Some Identities of Fully Degenerate Bernoulli Polynomials Associated with Degenerate Bernstein Polynomials

1
Division of Applied Mathematics, Nanoscale Science and Technology Institute, Wonkwang University, Iksan 54538, Korea
2
Department of Applied Mathematics, Kyunghee University, Yongin 17104, Korea
3
Graduate School of Education, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Symmetry 2019, 11(5), 709; https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11050709
Submission received: 26 April 2019 / Revised: 16 May 2019 / Accepted: 20 May 2019 / Published: 24 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Trends in Symmetric Polynomials with Their Applications Ⅱ)

Abstract

:
In this paper, we investigate some properties and identities for fully degenerate Bernoulli polynomials in connection with degenerate Bernstein polynomials by means of bosonic p-adic integrals on Z p and generating functions. Furthermore, we study two variable degenerate Bernstein polynomials and the degenerate Bernstein operators.

1. Introduction

Let p be a fixed prime number. Throughout this paper, Z , Z p , Q p and C p , will denote the ring of rational integers, the ring of p-adic integers, the field of p-adic rational numbers and the completion of algebraic closure of Q p , respectively. The p-adic norm | q | p is normalized as | p | p = 1 p .
For λ , t C p with | λ t | p < p 1 p 1 and | t | p < 1 , the degenerate Bernoulli polynomials are defined by the generating function to be
t ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 ( 1 + λ t ) x λ = n = 0 β n ( x | λ ) t n n ! ,
(See [1,2,3]). When x = 0 , β n ( λ ) = β n ( 0 | λ ) are called the degenerate Bernoulli numbers. Note that lim λ 0 β n ( x | λ ) = B n ( x ) , where B n ( x ) are the ordinary Bernoulli polynomials defined by
t e t 1 e x t = n = 0 B n ( x ) t n n ! ,
and B n = B n ( 0 ) are called the Bernoulli numbers. The degenerate exponential function is defined by
e λ x ( t ) = ( 1 + λ t ) x λ = n = 0 ( x ) n , λ t n n ! ,
where ( x ) 0 , λ = 1 , ( x ) n , λ = x ( x λ ) ( x 2 λ ) ( x ( n 1 ) λ ) , for n 1 . From (1), we get
β n ( x | λ ) = l = 0 n n l β l ( λ ) ( x ) n l , λ .
Recentely, Kim-Kim introduced the degenerate Bernstein polynomials given by
( x ) k , λ k ! t k ( 1 + λ t ) 1 x λ = n = k B k , n ( x | λ ) t n n ! ,
(See [4,5,6]). Thus, by (5), we note that
B k , n ( x | λ ) = n k ( x ) k , λ ( 1 x ) n k , λ , if n k , 0 , if n < k .
where n , k are non-negative integers. Let U D ( Z p ) be the space of uniformly differentiable functions on Z p . For f U D ( Z p ) , the degenerate Bernstein operator of order n is given by
B n , λ ( f | λ ) = k = 0 f k n n k ( x ) k , λ ( 1 x ) n k , λ = k = 0 f k n B k , n ( x | λ ) ,
(See [4,5,6]). The bosonic p-adic integral on Z p is defined by Volkenborn as
Z p f ( x ) d μ 0 ( x ) = lim N 1 p N x = 0 p N 1 f ( x ) ,
(See [7]). By (8), we get
Z p f ( x + 1 ) d μ 0 ( x ) Z p f ( x ) d μ 0 ( x ) = f ( 0 ) ,
where d d x f ( x ) | x = 0 = f ( 0 ) .
From (8), Kim-Seo [8] proposed fully degenerate Bernoulli polynomials which are reformulated in terms of bosonic p-adic integral on Z p as
Z p ( 1 + λ t ) x + y λ d μ 0 ( y ) = 1 λ log ( 1 + λ t ) ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 ( 1 + λ t ) x λ = n = 0 B n ( x | λ ) t n n ! ,
and for x = 0 , B n ( λ ) = B n ( 0 | λ ) are called fully degenerate Bernoulli numbers.
Note that the fully degenerate Bernoulli polynomial was named Daehee polynomials with α -parameter in [9]. On the other hand,
Z p ( 1 + λ t ) x + y λ d μ 0 ( y ) = n = 0 Z p ( x + y ) n , λ d μ 0 ( y ) t n n ! .
By (10) and (11), we get
Z p ( x + y ) n , λ d μ 0 ( y ) = B n ( x | λ ) , ( n 0 ) .
Recall that the Daehee polynomials are defined by the generating function to be
log ( 1 + t ) t 1 + t x = n = 0 D n ( x ) t n n ! ,
and for x = 0 , D n = D n ( 0 ) are called the Daehee numbers (see [10,11]).
Also, the higher order Daehee polynomials are defined by the generating function to be
log ( 1 + t ) t k 1 + t x = n = 0 D n ( k ) ( x ) t n n ! ,
and for x = 0 , D n ( k ) = D n ( k ) ( 0 ) are called the higher order Daehee numbers. From (10), we observe
1 λ log ( 1 + λ t ) ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 ( 1 + λ t ) x λ = t ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 ( 1 + λ t ) x λ log ( 1 + λ t ) λ t = m = 0 β m ( x | λ ) t m m ! l = 0 D l ( λ t ) l l ! = n = 0 m = 0 n n m β m ( x | λ ) D n m λ n m t n n ! .
By (10) and (14), we get
B n ( x | λ ) = m = 0 n n m β m ( x | λ ) D n m λ n m , ( n 0 ) .
From (3) and (10), we observe that
n = 0 B n ( x | λ ) t n n ! = 1 λ log ( 1 + λ t ) ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 ( 1 + λ t ) x λ = m = 0 B m ( λ ) t m m ! l = 0 ( x ) l , λ t l l ! = n = 0 m = 0 n n m B m ( λ ) ( x ) n m , λ t n n ! .
By (17), we get
B n ( x | λ ) = m = 0 n n m B m ( λ ) ( x ) n m , λ , ( n 0 ) .
From (1) and (3), we note that
t = ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 m = 0 β m ( λ ) t m m ! = l = 0 ( 1 ) l , λ t l l ! m = 0 β m ( λ ) t m m ! m = 0 β m ( λ ) t m m ! = n = 0 m = 0 n n m ( 1 ) n m , λ β m ( λ ) t n n ! n = 0 β n ( λ ) t n n ! = n = 0 m = 0 n n m ( 1 ) n m , λ β m ( λ ) β n ( λ ) t n n ! .
Comparing the cofficients on both sides of (19), we get
m = 0 n n m ( 1 ) n m , λ β m ( λ ) β n ( λ ) = δ 1 , n , ( n 0 ) ,
where δ k , n is the Kronecker’s symbol.
By (4) and (20), we have
β n ( 1 | λ ) β n ( λ ) = δ 1 , n .
The generating function of fully degenerate Bernoulli polynomials introduced in (5) can be expressed as bosonic p-adic integral but the generating function of degenerate Bernoulli polynomials introduced in (1) is not expressed as a bosonic p-adic integral. This is why we considered the fully degenerate Bernoulli polynomials, and the motivation of this paper is to investigate some identities of them associated with degenerate Bernstein polynomials.
In this paper, we consider the fully degenerate Bernoulli polynomials and investigate some properties and identities for these polynomials in connection with degenerate Bernstein polynomials by means of bosonic p-adic integrals on Z p and generating functions. Furthermore, we study two variable degenerate Bernstein polynomials and the degenerate Bernstein operators.

2. Fully Degenerate Bernoulli and Bernstein Polynomials

From (10), we observe that
n = 0 B n ( 1 x | λ ) t n n ! = 1 λ log ( 1 + λ t ) ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 ( 1 + λ t ) 1 x λ = 1 λ 1 + ( λ ) ( t ) 1 + ( λ ) ( t ) 1 λ 1 1 + ( λ ) ( t ) x λ = n = 0 B n ( x | λ ) ( 1 ) n t n n ! .
From (22), we obtain the following Lemma.
Lemma 1.
For n N { 0 } , we have
B n ( 1 x | λ ) = ( 1 ) n B n ( x | λ ) .
From (16) and (21), we get
B n ( 1 | λ ) B n ( λ ) = m = 0 n n m β m ( 1 | λ ) β m ( λ ) D n m λ n m = m = 0 n n m δ 1 , m D n m λ n m , ( n 0 ) .
From (1), we observe that
n = 0 β n ( x + 1 | λ ) t n n ! = ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ m = 0 β m ( x | λ ) t m m ! = l = 0 ( 1 ) l , λ t l l ! m = 0 β m ( x | λ ) t m m ! = n = 0 m = 0 n n m ( 1 ) n m , λ β m ( x | λ ) t n n ! .
By (25), we get
β n ( x + 1 | λ ) = m = 0 n n m ( 1 ) n m , λ β m ( x | λ ) .
By (26), with x = 1 , we have
β n ( 2 | λ ) = m = 0 n n m β m ( 1 | λ ) ( 1 ) n m , λ = ( 1 ) n , λ β 0 ( 1 | λ ) + n ( 1 ) n 1 , λ β 1 ( 1 | λ ) + m = 2 n n m β m ( 1 | λ ) ( 1 ) n m , λ = ( 1 ) n , λ + n ( 1 ) n 1 , λ β 1 ( λ ) 1 + m = 2 n n m β m ( λ ) ( 1 ) n m , λ = ( 1 ) n , λ + n ( 1 ) n 1 , λ β 1 ( λ ) n ( 1 ) n 1 , λ + m = 2 n n m β m ( λ ) ( 1 ) n m , λ = n ( 1 ) n 1 , λ + m = 0 n n m β m ( λ ) ( 1 ) n m , λ = n ( 1 ) n 1 , λ + β n ( 1 | λ ) .
Therefore, by (27), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
For n N , we have
β n ( 2 | λ ) = n ( 1 ) n 1 , λ + β n ( 1 | λ ) .
Note that
( 1 x ) n , λ = ( 1 ) n ( x 1 ) n , λ , ( n 0 ) .
Therefore by (12), (23), and (29), we get
Z p ( 1 x ) n , λ d μ 0 ( x ) = ( 1 ) n Z p ( x 1 ) n , λ d μ 0 ( x ) = Z p ( x + 2 ) n , λ d μ 0 ( x ) .
Therefore, by (30) and Theorem 1, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 2.
For n N , we have
Z p ( 1 x ) n , λ d μ 0 ( x ) = Z p ( x + 2 ) n , λ d μ 0 ( x ) = n ( 1 ) n 1 , λ ( λ 1 ) B 1 ( λ ) + Z p ( x ) n , λ d μ 0 ( x ) .
Corollary 1.
For n N , we have
( 1 ) n B n ( 1 | λ ) = ( 1 ) n 1 , λ 1 n B 1 ( λ ) + B n ( λ ) = B n ( 2 | λ ) .
By (17), we get
B n ( 1 x | λ ) = m = 0 n n m B m ( λ ) ( 1 x ) n m , λ = m = 0 n n m ( x ) m , λ ( 1 x ) n m , λ B m ( λ ) ( x ) m , λ = m = 0 n B m , n ( x | λ ) B m ( λ ) 1 ( x ) m , λ .
In [8], we note that
1 ( x ) m , λ = 1 x ( x λ ) ( x 2 λ ) ( x ( m 1 ) λ ) = k = 0 m 1 ( 1 ) k ( m 1 ) ! m 1 k ( λ ) 1 m x k λ , ( m N ) .
By (33) and (34) we get
B n ( 1 x | λ ) = m = 0 n B m , n ( x | λ ) B m ( λ ) 1 ( x ) m , λ = ( 1 x ) n , λ + m = 1 n B m , n ( x | λ ) B m ( λ ) 1 ( x ) m , λ = ( 1 x ) n , λ + m = 1 n B m , n ( x | λ ) B m ( λ ) ( λ ) 1 m ( m 1 ) ! k = 0 m 1 ( 1 ) k m 1 k 1 x k λ .
Therefore, by (35), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.
For n N { 0 } , we have
B n ( 1 x | λ ) = ( 1 x ) n , λ + m = 1 n B m , n ( x | λ ) B m ( λ ) ( λ ) 1 m ( m 1 ) ! k = 0 m 1 ( 1 ) k m 1 k 1 x k λ .
Corollary 2.
For n N { 0 } , we have
B n ( 2 | λ ) = ( 2 ) n , λ + m = 1 n B m , n ( 1 | λ ) B m ( λ ) ( λ ) 1 m ( m 1 ) ! k = 0 m 1 ( 1 ) k + 1 m 1 k 1 1 + k λ .
For k N , the higher-order fully degenerate Bernoulli polynomials are given by the generating function
1 λ log ( 1 + λ t ) ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 k ( 1 + λ t ) x λ = n = 0 B n ( k ) ( x | λ ) t n n ! ,
(See [8,12,13]). When x = 0 , B n ( k ) ( λ ) = B n ( k ) ( x | 0 ) are called the higher-order fully degenerate Bernoulli numbers. From (5) and (38), we note that
log ( 1 + λ t ) λ t k n = k B k , n ( x | λ ) t n n ! = ( x ) k , λ t k ( 1 + λ t ) 1 x λ log ( 1 + λ t ) λ t k 1 k ! = ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 k ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 k ( x ) k , λ 1 λ log ( 1 + λ t ) k ( 1 + λ t ) 1 x λ 1 k ! = ( x ) k , λ m = 0 k k m ( 1 ) m k ( 1 + λ t ) m λ 1 λ log ( 1 + λ t ) ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 k ( 1 + λ t ) 1 x λ 1 k ! = ( x ) k , λ m = 0 k k m ( 1 ) m k 1 λ log ( 1 + λ t ) ( 1 + λ t ) 1 λ 1 k ( 1 + λ t ) 1 x + m λ 1 k ! = ( x ) k , λ m = 0 k k m ( 1 ) m k n = 0 B n ( 1 x + m | λ ) t n n ! 1 k ! = n = 0 ( x ) k , λ m = 0 k k m ( 1 ) m k B n ( 1 x + m | λ ) 1 k ! t n n ! ,
and hence, we get
log ( 1 + λ t ) λ t k m = k B k , m ( x | λ ) t m m ! = l = 0 D l ( k ) λ l t l l ! m = k B k , m ( x | λ ) t m m ! = n = k l = 0 n D l ( k ) λ l B k , n l ( x | λ ) t n n ! .
Therefore, by (39) and (40), we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 4.
For k , n N , we have
1 k ! ( x ) n , λ m = 0 k k m ( 1 ) m k B n ( 1 x + m | λ ) = l = 0 n D l ( k ) λ l B k , n l ( x | λ ) , if n k , 0 , if n < k .
Let f U D ( Z p ) . For x 1 , x 2 Z p , we consider the degenerate Bernstein operator of order n given by
B n , λ ( f | x 1 , x 2 ) = k = 0 n f k n n k ( x 1 ) k , λ ( 1 x 2 ) n k , λ = k = 0 n f k n B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) ,
where B n , k ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) are called two variable degenerate Bernstein polynomials of degree n as followings (see, [2,3,4,5,6,9,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]):
B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) = n k ( x 1 ) k , λ ( 1 x 2 ) n k , λ , ( n 0 ) .
The authors [3] obtained the following:
k = 0 B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) t n n ! = ( x 1 ) k , λ k ! t k e λ 1 x 2 ( t ) .
The authors [8] obtained the following:
B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) = n k 1 ( 1 x 1 ) n ( n k ) , λ ( 1 x 2 ) n k , λ = B n k , n ( 1 x 2 , 1 x 1 | λ ) ,
and
B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) = ( 1 x 2 ( n k 1 ) λ ) B k , n 1 ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) + ( x 1 ( k 1 ) λ ) B k 1 , n 1 ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) .
From (42), we note that x 1 , x 2 Z p , if f ( x ) = 1 , then we have
B n , λ ( 1 | x 1 , x 2 ) = k = 0 n B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) = k = 0 n n k ( x 1 ) k , λ ( 1 x 2 ) n k , λ = ( 1 + x 1 x 2 ) n , λ ,
and if f ( t ) = t , then we have
B n , λ ( t | x 1 , x 2 ) = ( x 1 ) 1 , λ ( x 1 + 1 λ x 2 ) n 1 , λ ,
and if f ( t ) = t 2 , then we have
B n , λ ( t 2 | x 1 , x 2 ) = 1 n ( x 1 ) 1 , λ ( x 1 + 1 λ x 2 ) n 1 , λ + n 1 n ( x 1 ) 2 , λ ( 1 + x 2 2 λ x 2 ) n 2 , λ .
The authors [3] obtained the following:
( x ) 1 , λ = 1 ( x 1 + 1 λ x 2 ) n 1 , λ B n ( t | x 1 , x 2 ) ,
and
( x ) 2 , λ = 1 ( x 1 + 1 2 λ x 2 ) n 2 , λ k = 2 n k 2 n 2 B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) ,
and
( x ) i , λ = 1 ( 1 + x 1 x 2 i λ ) n i , λ k = i n k i n i B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) .
Taking double bosonic p-adic integral on Z p , we get the following equation:
Z p Z p B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) d μ 0 ( x 1 ) d μ 0 ( x 2 ) = n k Z p ( x 1 ) k , λ d μ 0 ( x 1 ) Z p ( 1 x 2 ) n k , λ d μ 0 ( x 2 ) .
Therefore, by (53) and Theorem 2, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 5.
For n , k N { 0 } , we have
Z p Z p B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) d μ 0 ( x 1 ) d μ 0 ( x 2 ) = n k B n ( λ ) ( 1 ) n 1 , λ n ( λ 1 ) B n ( λ ) + B n k ( λ ) , if n > k , B n ( λ ) , if n = k .
We get from the symmetric properties of two variable degenerate Bernstein polynomials that for n , k N with n > k ,
Z p Z p B k , n ( x 1 , x 2 | λ ) d μ 0 ( x 1 ) d μ 0 ( x 2 ) = m = 0 k n k k m ( 1 ) k + m ( 1 ) m , λ × Z p Z p ( 1 x 1 ) k m , λ ( 1 x 2 ) n k , λ d μ 0 ( x 1 ) d μ 0 ( x 2 ) = n k Z p ( 1 x 2 ) n k d μ 0 ( x 2 ) m = 0 k n k k m ( 1 ) k + m ( 1 ) m , λ d μ 0 ( x 2 ) × ( 1 ) k m , λ ( k m ) ( λ 1 ) B 1 ( λ ) + Z p ( x 1 ) k m , λ d μ 0 ( x 1 ) = n k B n k , λ ( 2 ) m = 0 k n k k m ( 1 ) k + m ( 1 ) m , λ × ( 1 ) k m , λ ( k m ) ( λ 1 ) B 1 ( λ ) + B k m , λ ( 2 )
Therefore, by Theorem 5, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 6.
For n , k N { 0 } , we have the following identities:
  • If n > k , then we have
    B n ( 1 ) n 1 , λ n ( λ 1 ) B 1 ( λ ) + B n k ( λ ) = B n k , λ ( 2 ) m = 0 k n k k m ( 1 ) k + m ( 1 ) m , λ × ( 1 ) k m , λ ( k m ) ( λ 1 ) B 1 ( λ ) + B k m , λ ( 2 ) .
  • If n = k , then we have
    B k ( λ ) = m = 0 k k n ( 1 ) k + m ( 1 ) k , λ ( 1 ) k m , λ ( k m ) ( λ 1 ) B 1 ( λ ) + B k m , λ ( 2 ) .

3. Remark

Let us assume that the probability of success in an experiment is p. We wondered if we could say the probability of success in the 9th trial is still p after failing eight times in a ten trial experiment, because there is a psychological burden to be successful. It seems plausible that the probability is less than p. The degenerate Bernstein polynomial B n ( x | λ ) is used in the probability of success. Thus, we give examples in our results as follows:
Example 1.
Let n = 2 , we have
B 2 ( 2 | λ ) = 2 ( 1 ) 1 , λ ( λ 1 ) B 1 ( λ ) + B 2 ( λ ) = 2 ( λ 1 ) 1 2 + λ 2 + 1 6 = λ 2 + 7 6 .
Example 2.
Let n = 1 , we have
B 1 ( 1 x | λ ) = ( 1 x ) 1 , λ + m = 1 1 B m , 1 ( x | λ ) B m ( λ ) ( 1 ) 1 m ( m 1 ) ! k = 0 m 1 ( 1 ) k m 1 k 1 x k λ = ( 1 x ) 1 , λ + B 1 , 1 ( x | λ ) B 1 ( λ ) 1 x = x + 1 2 .
Example 3.
Let n = 1 , k = 2 , we have
( x ) 1 , λ m = 0 2 2 m ( 1 ) m 2 B 1 ( 1 x + m | λ ) = x B 1 ( 1 x | λ ) 2 B 1 ( 2 x | λ ) + B 1 ( 3 x | λ ) = x x + 1 2 2 x + 3 2 + x + 5 2 = 0 .

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we studied the fully degenerate Bernoulli polynomials associated with degenerate Bernstein polynomials. In Section 1, Equations (12), (18), (20) and (21) are some properties of them. In Section 2, Theorems 1–3 are results of identities for fully degenerate Bernoulli polynomials in connection with degenerate Bernstein polynomials by means of bosonic p-adic integrals on Z p and generating functions. Theorems 4–6 are results of higher-order fully Bernoulli polynomials in connection with two variable degenerate Bernstein polynomials by means of bosonic p-adic integrals on Z p and generating functions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.K. and L.-C.J.; Data curation, L.-C.J.; Formal analysis, L.-C.J.; Funding acquisition, J.G.L.; Investigation, J.G.L., W.K. and L.-C.J.; Methodology, W.K. and L.-C.J.; Project administration, L.-C.J.; Resources, L.-C.J.; Supervision, L.-C.J.; Visualization, L.-C.J.; Writing—original draft, W.K. and L.-C.J.; Writing—review & editing, J.G.L. and L.-C.J.

Funding

This paper was supported by Wonkwang University in 2018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Kim, T. Barnes’ type multiple degenerate Bernoulli and Euler polynomials. Appl. Math. Comput. 2015, 258, 556–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. Identities for degenerate Bernoulli polynomials and Korobov polynomials of the first kind. Sci. China Math. 2019, 62, 999–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, D.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, D.J.; Kim, T. Identities of Symmetry for Type 2 Bernoulli and Euler Polynomials. Symmetry 2019, 11, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. Degenerate Bernstein polynomials. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mater. 2018, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. Correction to: Degenerate Bernstein polynomials. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fís. Nat. Ser. A Mater. 2019, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. Some Identities on Degenerate Bernstein and Degenerate Euler Polynomials. Mathematics 2019, 7, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, T. q-Volkenborn integration. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2002, 9, 288–299. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Mansour, T.; Seo, J.-J. Fully degenerate poly-Bernoulli polynomials with a q parameter. Filomat 2016, 30, 1029–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T. A Note on polyexponential and unipoly functions. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2019, 26, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kim, T.; Kim, D.S. Extended Stirling numbers of the first kind associated with Daehee numbers and polynomials. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Exactas Fis. Nat. Ser. A Mater. 2019, 113, 1159–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pyo, S.-S.; Kim, T.; Rim, S.-H. Degenerate Daehee Numbers of the Third Kind. Mathematics 2018, 6, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Seo, J.-J. Fully degenerate poly-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials. Open Math. 2016, 14, 545–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, T.; Kwon, H.I.; Mansour, T.; Rim, S.-H. Symmetric identities for the fully degenerate Bernoulli polynomials and degenerate Euler polynomials under symmetric group of degree n. Util. Math. 2017, 103, 61–72. [Google Scholar]
  14. Araci, S.; Acikgoz, M. A note on the Frobenius-Euler numbers and polynomials associated with Bernstein polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2012, 22, 399–406. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bayad, A.; Kim, T. Identities involving values of Bernstein, q-Bernoulli, and q-Euler polynomials. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2011, 18, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Choi, J. A note on p-adic integrals associated with Bernstein and q–Bernstein polynomials’. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2011, 21, 133–138. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Jang, G.W.; Kwon, J. A note on degenerate Bernstein polynomials. J. Inequal. Appl. 2019, 2019, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, T.; Choi, J.; Kim, Y.H.; Ryoo, C.S. On the fermionic p-adic integral representation of Bernstein polynomials associated with Euler numbers and polynomials. J. Inequal. Appl. 2010, 1, 864247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, T.; Choi, J.; Kim, Y.H. On the k-dimensional generalization of q-Bernstein polynomials. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2011, 14, 199–207. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kim, T. A note on q-Bernstein polynomials. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 2011, 18, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, T.; Kim, Y.H.; Bayad, A. A study on the p-adic q-integral representation on Z p associated with the weighted q-Bernstein and q-Bernoulli polynomials. J. Inequal. Appl. 2011, 513821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, T.; Lee, B.; Lee, S.-H.; Rim, S.-H. A note on q-Bernstein polynomials associated with p-adic integral on Zp. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2013, 15, 584–592. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim, W.J.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, T. Some identities of degenerate Euler polynomials associated with Degenerate Bernstein polynomials. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1904.08592. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kurt, V. Some relation between the Bernstein polynomials and second kind Bernoulli polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2013, 23, 43–48. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ostrovska, S. On the q–Bernstein polynomials. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2005, 11, 193–204. [Google Scholar]
  26. Park, J.-W.; Pak, H.K.; Rim, S.-H.; Kim, T.; Lee, S.-H. A note on the q-Bernoulli numbers and q–Bernstein polynomials. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2013, 15, 722–729. [Google Scholar]
  27. Siddiqui, M.A.; Agrawal, R.R.; Gupta, N. On a class of modified new Bernstein operators. Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang) 2014, 24, 97–107. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.G.; Kim, W.; Jang, L.-C. Some Identities of Fully Degenerate Bernoulli Polynomials Associated with Degenerate Bernstein Polynomials. Symmetry 2019, 11, 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11050709

AMA Style

Lee JG, Kim W, Jang L-C. Some Identities of Fully Degenerate Bernoulli Polynomials Associated with Degenerate Bernstein Polynomials. Symmetry. 2019; 11(5):709. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11050709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Jeong Gon, Wonjoo Kim, and Lee-Chae Jang. 2019. "Some Identities of Fully Degenerate Bernoulli Polynomials Associated with Degenerate Bernstein Polynomials" Symmetry 11, no. 5: 709. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11050709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop