Abstract
In this work, sufficient conditions for computing periodic solutions have been obtained in the circular Hill Problem with regard to arbitrary disturbing forces. This problem will be solved by means of using the averaging theory for dynamical systems as the main mathematical tool that has been applied in this work.
MSC:
37C27; 37J30; 37J25
1. Introduction
The three-body problem, as it is known, is a special case of the n—body problem where the motion of three point masses under their mutual gravitational interactions is described. This classical problem represents a large range of astronomical situations. Because a general solution of the problem exists but it is unusable in practice, some simplifications to it have been made. The Hill problem is an example of this. There are many studies on the Hill problem [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], and many modifications of this classic problem have appeared in the mathematical, astronomical, and mechanical literature. For example, in [6], Markellos and Roy introduced a photogravitational Hill problem as a simplified, non-trivial form of the photogravitational restricted three-body problem. In [8], Papadakis made a mainly numerical study of this problem on the planar case. On the other hand, in [2], the authors focused their attention on the case of a perturbed spatial Hill lunar problem using the averaging theory, and in [3], Chavineau and Mignard studied the trajectories of the Hill problem to describe the effect of solar perturbations on the relative motion of a binary asteroid. In a central force field, the binary objects case can be approached from potential [4].
Our main goal in this study was to find, using the averaging theory, sufficient conditions for the existence of periodic orbits that come from the Lagrangian points of the circular Hill problem with arbitrary disturbing forces.
Firstly, we assumed that the first two masses were small, compared to the third one (i.e., we assumed and were small as compared to M), and that the two small masses were close together, as compared to their separation from the third mass.
In the case of the circular Hill problem, the equations of the relative motion are [3,4]:
where G is the gravitational constant, , and is the angular velocity of the motion of the barycenter of the - system around M.
The equilibrium solutions of the differential system (1) are given by
In this work, we provide sufficient conditions for the existence of periodic solutions coming from the equilibrium point, . The same conditions are valid for the equilibrium,
Making the change of variables , and , and linearizing, we can rewrite the unperturbed system of differential Equations (1) in the form:
Using the averaging theory, we will provide a system of nonlinear equations whose simple zeros provide periodic solutions of the perturbed system:
where the parameter is small, and and are the smooth and periodic functions in the variable t in resonance positive integers relatively prime) with some of the periodic solutions for .
The unperturbed system (2) has a unique singular point, the origin, with eigenvalues with
and thus, the phase space has two planes (excluding the origin) covered by periodic solutions, with periods
Accordingly, they belong to the plane associated to the eigenvectors with eigenvalues or , respectively. Now, we are going to study if and when the parameter is sufficiently small, and when the perturbed functions for have a period of either or , whether these solutions still exist for the perturbed system (3).
As usual, we are going to call a simple zero of the system to any solution , such that .
If is a simple zero, then the -periodic solution of the unperturbed system with as the initial value gives a -periodic solution of the perturbed system (see Appendix A).
Given an initial condition, we can use this result in order to find sufficient conditions for the existence of families of periodic orbits.
Theorem 1.
Suppose that the functions of the equations of motion of (3), , , and are smooth and periodic functions of the period in the variable t, with p and q being positive integers that are relatively prime, and where the ratio of the frequencies are not resonant with π. If is sufficiently small, then for every simple zero that is not null, , of the nonlinear system , the system (3) has a periodic solution such that , when —that is, when the periodic solution for the unperturbed system (2) travelled p times.
In the next corollary, an application of Theorem 1 is shown, whose proof is implemented in Section 3.
Corollary 1.
Assume that , are arbitrary, smooth functions, and
If is sufficiently small, the perturbed system (3) has one periodic solution such that, whenever , tends to the periodic solution of the unperturbed system .
This corollary will be proved in Section 3.
Figure 1.
Solutions of the differential system (3) for the smooth functions , , and for Corollary 1 with , , , , and .
As has been stated before, if is a simple zero of , then the -periodic solution of the unperturbed system with as the initial value gives a -periodic solution of the perturbed system (see Appendix A).
Theorem 2.
Suppose that the functions of the equations of motion of (3), , , and , are smooth and periodic functions of the period in the variable t, with p and q positive integers relatively prime, and the ratio of the frequencies not resonant with π. If is sufficiently small, then for every simple and not null zero, of the nonlinear system , the system (3) has a periodic solution such that , when —that is, when the periodic solution for the unperturbed system (2) travelled p times.
The proof of Theorem 2 is given in Section 2.
In the next corollary, an application of Theorem 2 is shown, whose proof is implemented in Section 3.
Corollary 2.
Let be the arbitrary and smooth function, and thus consider:
If is sufficiently small, the perturbed system (3) has one periodic solution, such that, whenever , tends to the periodic solution of the unperturbed system , .
Corollary 2 will be proved in Section 3.
Figure 2.
Solutions of the differential system (3) for the smooth functions , and for Corollary 2 with , , , and .
2. Proof of Theorems 1 and 3
The differential system (3) must be written as a first-order differential system defined in . For that, the variables have been introduced in the following form, this being:
It must be remarked that if , the differential system (5) is equivalent to the differential system (2), well-known as the unperturbed system. Otherwise, when , this is known as the perturbed system
The change of variables given by
writes the linear part of the differential system (5) in its real Jordan normal form, and this system in the new variables becomes
where
with , and
In order to prove Theorems 1 and 2, in the following lemma we are going to obtain the general expressions of the periodic orbits of the unperturbed system.
Lemma 1.
If , the —periodic solutions of the system of the differential Equations (7) are
and the —periodic solutions are
Proof of Lemma 1.
If , the system (7) is a system of linear differential equations, and the proof follows easily. □
Proof of Theorem 1.
Since the positive integers p and q are relatively prime, and the functions of the system (3) are —periodic in the variable t, we can consider that the system (7) and the solutions (8) are —periodic.
Now, we shall study what periodic solutions of the unperturbed system (7) with of the type (8) persist as periodic solutions, with the perturbed one for being sufficiently small.
If we write the system (7) in the form
where
we can apply Theorem A1 of the Appendix A. Our starting point is the description of the different elements which appear in this theorem for the particular case of the differential system (7). In this case, , and . Now, let be arbitrarily small, and let be arbitrarily large. If V is the open and bounded subset of the plane , of the form . If , then we identify V with the set , where is the Euclidean norm in . If we denote by Cl, the closure of V, the function is . Using all these elements in our system, we have
Now, for each , we consider the —periodic solution
given by (8).
The fundamental matrix of the linear differential system (7) with , that is, associated to the —periodic solution and such that in , is
where does not depend on the particular periodic solution .
Computing the matrix , we get
and M satisfies the assumptions of statement (ii) of Theorem A1, since the determinant
owing to the ratio of the frequencies, is non-resonant with . In other words, all the assumptions of Theorem A1 are satisfied by the system (7).
In our particular system, if , the map : is given by , and if we calculate the function
we obtain , where the functions are given in (4). Then, by means of Theorem A1 of the Appendix A, for every simple zero of the system of nonlinear functions , there is a periodic solution of system (7), so that
Going back through the change of variables (6), the periodic solution of system (7) has been obtained, so that
Consequently, a periodic solution of system (3) has been achieved, so that
This completes the proof of Theorem 1. □
Proof of Theorem 2.
The proof is analogous to the proof of Theorem 1 changing the roles of for , and we obtain the periodic solution
In consequence, a periodic solution of system (3) has been obtained, so that
□
3. Proof of Corollaries 1 and 2
Proof of Corollary 1.
Under the assumptions of Corollary 1, we have the function
and
Therefore, the solution of the nonlinear system is simple, and by Theorem 1 we only have one periodic solution for the system of this corollary. □
Proof of Corollary 2.
Under the assumptions of Corollary 2, we have the function
and, if ,
Therefore, the solution of the nonlinear system is simple. By means of Theorem 1, the system of this Corollary has only this periodic solution. □
Author Contributions
All the authors have contributed in an equal way to the research in this paper.
Funding
This work has been partially supported by FEDER OP2014-2020 of Castilla-La Mancha (Spain) grant number 2019-GRIN-27168, Fundación Séneca de la Región de Murcia (Spain) grant number 20783/PI/18 and the grant of Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades from Spain reference PGC2018-097198-B-I00.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A. Basic Results on Averaging Theory
In this appendix we present the basic result from the averaging theory that we shall need for proving the main results of this paper.
We consider the problem of the bifurcation of —periodic solutions from a differential system of the form
with sufficiently small. Here the functions and are functions, —periodic in the first variable, and is an open subset of . The main assumption is that the unperturbed system
has a submanifold of periodic solutions. A solution of this problem is given using the averaging theory.
Malkin (see [13] and references therein) studied the bifurcation of T–periodic solutions in the T–periodic system , whose unperturbed system has a family of T–periodic solutions with initial conditions given by a smooth function , and proved that if the bifurcation function
where , , are k linearly independent T-periodic solutions of the adjoint linearized differential system, has a simple zero such that , then for any sufficiently small, the system has an unique T–periodic solution such that as .
This can be rephrased as follows: Let be the solution of the system (A2) such that . We write the linearization of the unperturbed system along a periodic solution as
In what follows we denote by some fundamental matrix of the linear differential system (A3), and by the projection of onto its first k coordinates; i.e., .
We assume that there exists a k-dimensional submanifold of filled with —periodic solutions of (A2). Then an answer to the problem of bifurcation of —periodic solutions from the periodic solutions contained in for system (A1) is given in the following result.
Theorem A1.
Let V be an open and bounded subset of , and let be a function. We assume that
We consider the function
For a proof of Theorem A1 see [12,19,20] for shorter proof.
References
- Abouelmagd, E.I.; Guirao, J.L.G. On the perturbed restricted three-body problem. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 2016, 1, 123–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Bustos, M.T.; Guirao, J.L.G.; Vera, J.A. The spatial Hill Lunar problem: Periodic solutions emerging from equilibria. Dynam. Syst. 2017, 32, 340–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauvineau, B.; Mignard, F. Dynamics of Binary Asteroids. I. Hill’s Case. Icarus 1990, 83, 360–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauvineau, B. The generalized Hill problem. Case of an external field of force deriving from a central potential. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 1991, 51, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llibre, J. On the central configurations of the n-body problem. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 2017, 2, 509–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markellos, V.V.; Roy, A.E.; Velgakis, M.J.; Kanavos, S.S. A Photogravitational Hill Problem and radiation effects on Hill Stability of Orbits. Astrophys. Space Sci. 2000, 271, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Michalodimitrakis, M. Hill’s problem: Families of three dimentional periodic orbits (part I). Astrophys. Space Sci. 1980, 68, 253–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadakis, K.E. The Planar Photogravitational Hill Problem. Int. J. Bifur. Chaos Appl. Sci. Engrg. 2006, 16, 1809–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perdiou, A.E.; Markellos, V.V.; Douskos, C.N. The Hill Problem with oblate secondary: Numerical exploration. Earth Moon Planets 2005, 97, 127–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Chavela, E.; Tamayo, C. Relative Equilibria in the 4-Vortex Problem Bifurcating from an Equilateral Triangle Configuration. Appl. Math. Nonlinear Sci. 2016, 1, 301–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simó, C.; Stuchi, T.J. Central stable/unstable manifolds and the destruction of KAM tori in the planar Hill problem. Physics D 2000, 140, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malkin, I.G. Some Problems of the Theory of Nonlinear Oscillations; Gosudarstv. Izdat. Tehn.–Teor. Lit.: Moscow, Russia, 1956. [Google Scholar]
- Buica, A.; García, I. Periodic solutions of some perturbed symmetric Euler top. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 36, 91–100. [Google Scholar]
- de Bustos, M.T.; Guirao, J.L.G.; Vera, J.A.; Vigo-Aguiar, J. Periodic orbits and C1-integrability in the planar Stark-Zeeman problem. J. Math. Phys. 2012, 53, 082701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Bustos, M.T.; Guirao, J.L.G.; Llibre, J.; Vera, J.A. New families of periodic orbits for a galactic potential. Chaos Solitons Fractals 2016, 82, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Bustos, M.T.; López, M.A.; Martínez, R. On the periodic auto-oscillations of an electric circuit with periodic imperfections on its variables. Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 2013, 7, 2105–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Bustos, M.T.; López, M.A.; Martínez, R. On the periodic solutions of a linear chain of three identical atoms. Nonlinear Dyn. 2014, 76, 893–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Llibre, J.; Rodrigues, A. On the periodic orbits of Hamiltonian systems. J. Math. Phys. 2010, 51, 042704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roseau, M. Vibrations Non Linéaires et Théorie de la Stabilité; Springer Tracts in Natural Philosophy; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1966; Volume 8. [Google Scholar]
- Buica, A.; Francoise, J.P.; Llibre, J. Periodic solutions of nonlinear periodic differential systems with a small parameter. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 2007, 6, 103–111. [Google Scholar]
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).