Abstract
Here, we consider the sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the third and fourth kinds. Then, we represent each of those sums of finite products as linear combinations of the four kinds of Chebyshev polynomials, which involve the hypergeometric function .
MSC:
11B68; 33C45
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
We first recall here that, for any nonnegative integer n, the falling factorial polynomials and the rising factorial polynomials are respectively given by:
The two factorial polynomials are related by:
We will make use of the following.
for any integers with .
Here, and are respectively the Beta and Gamma functions.
The hypergeometric function is defined by (see [1]):
In this paper, we will need only some basic knowledge about Chebyshev polynomials, which we recall here in below. The interested reader may want to refer to [1,2,3] for full accounts of this fascinating area of orthogonal polynomials.
The Chebyshev polynomials of the first, second, third and fourth kinds are respectively defined by the following generating functions.
One way of deriving their generating functions is from their trigonometric formulas. For example, those formulas for ) and are given by:
They are explicitly expressed as in the following.
The Chebyshev polynomials of the first, second, third and fourth kinds are also given by Rodrigues’ formulas.
They have the following orthogonalities with respect to various weight functions.
where:
To proceed further, we let:
We note here that both and are polynomials of degree n.
In the following, we assume that the polynomials with subscript n, like and , have degree n.
The linearization problem in general consists of determining the coefficients in the expansion of the product of two polynomials and in terms of an arbitrary polynomial sequence :
A special problem of this is the case when , which is called either the standard linearization or the Clebsch–Gordan-type problem.
Another particular case is when , which is the so-called connection problem. If further , it is called the inversion problem for the sequence .
In this paper, we will consider the sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the third and fourth kinds in (25) and (26). Then, we are going to express each of them as linear combinations of the four kinds of Chebyshev polynomials , , and . Thus, our problem may be regarded as a generalization of the linearization problem. We obtain them by explicit computations and using Propositions 1 and Lemma 1. The general formulas in Proposition 1 can be derived by using orthogonalities and Rodrigues’ formulas for Chebyshev polynomials and integration by parts.
Finally, we note that many problems in physics and engineering can be solved with the help of special functions; for instance, we let the reader refer to the excellent papers [4,5,6] in this direction.
The next two theorems are our main results in which the terminating hypergeometric functions appear.
Theorem 1.
Let n, r be integers with , . Then we have following.
Theorem 2.
Let n, r be integers with , . Then we have following.
As we know, the Bernoulli polynomials are not orthogonal polynomials, but Appell polynomials. In [7], the sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials in (25) and (26) were expressed as linear combinations of Bernoulli polynomials. Furthermore, the same has been done for the sums of finite products of Bernoulli, Euler and Genocchi polynomials in [8,9,10]. All of these were found by deriving Fourier series expansions for the functions closely connected with those various sums of finite products. For some other applications of Chebyshev polynomials, we let the reader refer to [11,12,13].
2. Proof of Theorem 1
Here, we will prove Theorem 1. For this purpose, we first state Proposition 1 and Lemma 1 that will be used in Section 2 and Section 3.
The results in Proposition 1 can be derived by using the orthogonalities in (20)–(23) and the Rodrigues formulas in (16)–(19). The statements and in Proposition 1 are respectively from the Equations (23) and (35) of [14], while and are respectively from the Equations (22) and (37) of [15].
Proposition 1.
Let be a polynomial of degree n. Then, we have the following.
Lemma 1.
Let l, m be nonnegative integers. Then, we have the following.
Proof.
By changing the variables , the integral in (35) becomes:
where we used (5) and (6). ☐
As was shown in [7], the following lemma can be obtained by differentiating Equation (10). It expresses the sums of finite products in (25) very neatly, which plays an important role in the following discussion.
Lemma 2.
Let n, r be integers with , . Then, we have the identity.
where the inner sum runs over all nonnegative integers , , ⋯, , with .
From (14), the r-th derivative of is given by:
In particular, we have:
Here, we will show only (28) of Theorem 1, since (27), (29) and (30) can be proved similarly to (28).
With as in (25), we let:
Then, from of Proposition 1, (36), (38) and integration by parts k times, we have:
From (40), (35), we get:
Using (3) and (4), (41) is equal to:
Now, the Equation (28) in Theorem 1 follows from (39) and (42).
3. Proof of Theorem 2
In this section, we will show (31) of Theorem 2, as (32)–(34) can be treated analogously to (31). The following lemma can be obtained by differentiating (11) and is stated as Lemma 3 in [7].
Lemma 3.
Let n, r be integers with , . Then, we have the following identity.
where the inner sum runs over all nonnegative integers , , ⋯, , with .
From (15), the r-th derivative of is given by:
In particular,
Here, we will show only (31) of Theorem 2, since (32)–(34) can be proven analogously to (31). With as in (26), we put:
Then, from of Proposition 1, (43), (45) and integration by parts k times, we have:
From (47), (35) and after some simplifications, we get:
Using (3) and (4), (48) is equal to:
Now, Equation (31) in Theorem 2 follows from (46) and (49).
Remark 1.
As we noted earlier, Lemmas 2 and 3 play crucial roles and express sums of finite products in (25) and (26) very neatly as higher-order derivatives of and . These could be derived by noting that Chebyshev polynomials are special cases of Jacobi polynomials and using the general formula for the derivative of Jacobi polynomials. Indeed, their Jacobi polynomial expressions and the derivatives of the Jacobi polynomials are as follows:
4. Conclusions
The linearization problem in general consists of determining the coefficients in the expansion of the product of two polynomials and in terms of an arbitrary polynomial sequence :
Along this line and as a generalization of this, we considered sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the third and fourth kinds and represented each of those sums of finite products as linear combinations of the four kinds of Chebyshev polynomials, which involve the hypergeometric function . It is certainly possible to represent such sums of finite products by other orthogonal polynomials, which is our ongoing project.
Author Contributions
T.K. and D.S.K. conceived the framework and structured the whole paper; T.K. wrote the paper; C.S.R. and D.D.V. checked the results of the paper; D.S.K. and C.S.R. completed the revision of the article.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MEST) (No. 2017R1A2B4006092)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the referees for their valuable comments, which improved the original manuscript in its present form.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Andrews, G.E.; Askey, R.; Roy, R. Special Functions; Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications 71; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Beals, R.; Wong, R. Special Functions and Orthogonal Polynomials; Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 153; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.X.; Guo, D.R. Special Functions; Guo, D.R.; Xia, X.J., Translators; World Scientific Publishing Co., Inc.: Teaneck, NJ, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Marin, M. A temporally evolutionary equation in elasticity of micropolar bodies with voids. Politehn. Univ. Buchar. Sci. Bull. Ser. A Appl. Math. Phys. 1998, 60, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
- Marin, M.; Stan, G. Weak solutions in elasticity of dipolar bodies with stretch. Carpath. J. Math. 2013, 29, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
- Marin, D.; Baleanu, D. On vibrations in thermoelasticity without energy dissipation for micropolar bodies. Bound. Value Probl. 2016, 2016, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Kwon, J. Representing Sums of finite products of Chebyshev polynomials of the third and fourth kinds by Chebyshev Polynomials. Preprints 2018, 2018060079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, R.P.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Kwon, J. Sums of finite products of Bernoulli functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 2017, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, G.-W.; Kwon, J. Sums of finite products of Euler functions. In Advances in Real and Complex Analysis with Applications, Trends in Mathematics; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 243–260. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, T.; Kim, D.S.; Jang, L.C.; Jang, G.-W. Sums of finite products of Genocchi functions. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2017, 2017, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doha, E.H.; Abd-Elhameed, W.M.; Alsuyuti, M.M. On using third and fourth kinds Chebyshev polynomials for solving the integrated forms of high odd-order linear boundary value problems. J. Egyptian Math. Soc. 2015, 23, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruchinin, D.V.; Kruchinin, V.V. Application of a composition of generating functions for obtaining explicit formulas of polynomials. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2013, 404, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mason, J.C. Chebyshev polynomials of the second, third and fourth kinds in approximation, indefinite integration, and integral transforms. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 1993, 49, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, D.S.; Kim, T.; Lee, S.-H. Some identities for Berounlli polynomials involving Chebyshev polynomials. J. Comput. Anal. Appl. 2014, 16, 172–180. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, D.S.; Dolgy, D.V.; Kim, T.; Rim, S.-H. Identities involving Bernoulli and Euler polynomials arising from Chebyshev polynomials. Proc. Jangjeon Math. Soc. 2012, 15, 361–370. [Google Scholar]
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).