Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Importance of Dynamic Landscape Connectivity
Previous Article in Journal
The Urbanization Run-Up in Italy: From a Qualitative Goal in the Boom Decades to the Present and Future Unsustainability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Adaptation to Land Degradation in Southeast Vietnam

1
Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO), Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
2
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of BioScience Engineering, University of Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
3
Institute of Geography, Vietnamese Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
4
Department of Environmental Impact Assessment, Vietnam Environment Administration, Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2020, 9(9), 302; https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090302
Submission received: 24 July 2020 / Revised: 17 August 2020 / Accepted: 25 August 2020 / Published: 28 August 2020

Abstract

:
A framework was developed to elucidate (1) the drivers of land degradation, (2) pressures, (3) local impacts and vulnerabilities and (4) adaptation strategies. The combination of participatory approaches, statistical data analysis, time series Landsat imagery and spatial data mining was tested in southeast Vietnam where the impacts of land degradation on the environment and economy are considerable. The major drivers of land degradation are climate, notably drought, and population density. The pressures include natural resource management and land use/cover change. A Landsat archive analysis showed an increase in agricultural land use from 31% to 50%, mostly at the expense of forests, from 1990 to 2019. Farmers adapted by investing in the irrigation of rice and dragon fruit, and by selecting their rainfed crops in line with the changing environment. The most vulnerable were the rural poor and farmers without access to land and water resources. The best protection against land degradation was prosperity, which is enhanced by the region’s location along Vietnam’s major national route, connecting major cities along a north–south axis. Our analysis shows that southeast Vietnam emerged as a region with an important human ecological resilience strengthened by increased prosperity. The current adaptation options and limitations warrant further research.

1. Introduction

Land degradation is a reduction in or loss of the biological or economic productivity and complexity of rainfed cropland, irrigated cropland, or ranges, pastures, forests and woodlands [1]. Land degradation results from land uses or from a process or combination of processes arising from human activities [1]. Sustainable Development Goal 15 (SDG15) calls for the protection of terrestrial ecosystems against land degradation [2]. Land Degradation Neutrality aims at maintaining or enhancing land-based natural capital and its associated ecosystem services [3,4] with Target Setting Programmes defined in different countries (e.g., in Vietnam, [5]). Reversing land degradation requires quantitative assessments and the mapping of degraded lands (SDG15.3.1 indicator).
Land degradation is caused by multiple drivers, including extreme weather conditions and human activities that degrade soil quality and land utility [6,7,8]. Drought can trigger severe land degradation processes that result in long recovery periods, particularly in the tropics [9]. These processes are a combination of drivers and feedback that are both spatiotemporally variant, context dependent and often difficult to monitor objectively [10,11]. The impacts of land degradation, and the underlying drivers of land condition changes should be monitored and assessed, such that remedial actions can target causes of land degradation [7]. Symptoms of land degradation change with land use and comprise different forms of degradation such as soil erosion, fertility loss, sparse canopy cover, productivity loss and/or biodiversity decline [12,13]. The drivers of land degradation processes rely on the geographical context so that their assessment requires spatiotemporal analysis. Understanding the bio-physical and social impacts on the affected regions in Vietnam is a prerequisite to sustainable action.
Drought is often an underlying driver of land condition change and strongly affects land degradation. Droughts are especially intense in regions where the climate is characterised by a dry hot season, intense evapotranspiration, and a marked seasonality of rainfall [14]. With gradual progression in time, a deficiency of precipitation or meteorological drought leads to soil water deficiencies or agricultural drought, to reduced streamflow or hydrological drought, and ultimately to socio-economic drought [15]. In addition, ecological drought has been defined to highlight the multiple stresses that drought creates across ecosystems [16]. Droughts pose a serious problem to vegetation and primary productivity, and biomass and agricultural production around the globe [14,17]. Both occasional droughts, due to seasonal or inter-annual variations in rainfall, and long-term recurring droughts can be aggravated by climate change and the influence of people on the environment [18]. Overall, drought negatively affects food production, livelihoods, and the provision of ecosystem goods and services, and an understanding of its complexity is a prerequisite to remedial action [19].
In regions prone to land degradation, soils are fragile due to an increased spatial and temporal heterogeneity of soil characteristics influencing water content and nutrient availability [20,21,22]. In sub-humid areas where climatic factors are less influential, the state of soil properties is a major factor in vulnerability to land degradation and therefore requires careful land management. Depending upon their nature, processes of degradation may be physical (erosion, soil organic carbon loss, compaction, waterlogging), chemical (salinisation, acidification, nutrient imbalances), and/or biological (rangeland degradation, deforestation, loss in biodiversity) [23]. The adverse environment leads to a persistent decline in economic bio-productivity of the land use or ecosystem [16]. Vegetation plays a major role in determining the biological composition of the land and in protecting the land and soil from degradation processes [24,25,26]. Population and livestock pressure, unsustainable land and water management, and human activities may exacerbate the degradation processes, the effects of which are accelerated by climate change [6,27]. Therefore, the interaction between land degradation and the adaptive capacity of land users is a prerequisite to identifying vulnerable systems and prioritising adaptation actions [28].
Vietnam is considered one of the most naturally hazard-prone countries in the world, which is further compounded by high population pressures and high levels of poverty, particularly along the coast. In 1998, Vietnam ratified the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. Vietnam has about 21 million hectares of agricultural and forest land, of which 7.55 million hectares are affected by degradation [29,30]. In Vietnam, the baseline is set as the year 2010 [31]. Of the total land area 13,048 km2 is severely degraded (4%), 24,043 km2 shows signs of degradation (7.3%), and 67,005 km2 is under threat of degradation (20.4%) [5]. Drought and desertification were reported to be severe in southeast Vietnam [5,31,32,33,34]. Coastal sand dunes cover 4620 km2; shifting sand dunes in combination with drought cause desertification in the southeastern provinces of Vietnam [5]. In addition, more than 3000 km2 in the southeastern provinces are severely affected by drought. Despite heavy rainfall and seasonal flooding during La Niña periods [35], El Niño-related prolonged droughts in 1997–1998, 2002–2003, 2009–2010 and 2015–2016 affected millions of people and led to hundreds of millions of dollars in economic loss, particularly affecting agriculture [29]. Drought, desertification and land degradation management are implemented through a National Action and Target Setting Programme to prevent further degradation [5].
The impacts of land degradation on the local environment and economy are considerable in Vietnam. According to interviews with government officials and experts, the major drivers of land degradation are climate, and in particular rainfall patterns, population density and dynamics, and land use planning that includes agriculture [31,32,33,34,35]. A quantification and stakeholder assessment of these and other possible drivers is necessary to estimate the impact, vulnerability and adaptation at the local level. Our objectives are therefore to (1) identify the major drivers and pressures related to land degradation, (2) assess the local impacts and vulnerability, and (3) identify response strategies and adaptation options. We developed a methodological framework and tested it on the heavily affected Binh Thuan province in southeast Vietnam.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Methodological Framework

The methodological framework (Figure 1) that we adopted comprised elements from the Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework applied to soil erosion [36], the chain of risk approach [37], integrated land resource analysis for sustainable land management [38,39] and vulnerability assessment [28]. The framework combines participatory methods and surveys with bio-meteorological analysis, geographic information system (GIS) and remote sensing, and statistical data evaluation.
All of the frameworks listed (Figure 1) have their origin in a certain environmental application domain and region of interest (Table 1). The frameworks have subsequently been used across the world and across a large number of disciplines, thereby capturing different aspects of land degradation [40].

2.2. Study Area

Binh Thuan is a province in southeast Vietnam with a total area of 7944 km2 and about 200 km of coastline (Figure 2). During the 1980–2010 period, the climate in the province was characterised by high average annual evapotranspiration rates (1370–1870 mm) and abundant sunshine (2500–2800 h per year) [29]. Average temperatures ranged between 21.7 °C for Tmin and 34.2 °C for Tmax. A dry land wind of 10.8 ± 2.8 m/s during the dry season added to high evapotranspiration rates. Both a lack of rain and extreme heat resulted in recurrent droughts in the lowland plains and the sand dunes along the coast. The province is part of the driest regions of Vietnam and is prone to desertification [31]. Due to drought, half of the agricultural land could not be harvested in 2005, and water shortages occurred for cattle, goats and sheep [29]. The dams reached only 40% of their capacity. With almost zero rainfall in the northern Tuy Phong and Bac Binh districts, agricultural losses were very severe. The prolonged 2015–2016 drought was the most severe drought that the province had experienced in the past 100 years [29], with reported damages at an estimated USD 2.6 million in 2015 and USD 4.77 million in 2016 [29].
The province has a diverse and complex topography from west to east: mountains, upland hills, lowland plains, sand dunes and a narrow coastal strip. The mountains reach heights of up to 1548 m where rock outcrops dominate the landscape. The upland hilly region comprises small valleys with rainfed agriculture where erosion or even landslides may occur during the rainy season. The lowland plains are characterised by meandering rivers along which wetland rice and irrigated crops are cultivated. Soils accumulate salt as high evapotranspiration rates often exceed rainfall. Regular droughts contribute to laterite formation. Towards the coast, sandstone formations give rise to severe gullying and ravine erosion. Where surface water supplies are inadequate, villagers depend heavily on groundwater for household use and irrigation, particularly to overcome the limitations of drought. Groundwater becomes saline since overexploitation leads to the intrusion of marine water. Though the boundaries of areas affected by saline soils and groundwater may be known for a particular year, their extent and causes require regular updating, while the status and quality of groundwater salinity necessitate further monitoring. Binh Thuan is thought to have 4% of the global Titanium reserves and has therefore attracted industrial mining of sandstone along the coast, where water is used for extraction and salt is produced as a byproduct. The coastal area is bordered by an impressive sparsely vegetated dune ridge up to 200 m high. Sand dunes form a major threat to the neighbouring agricultural activities.

2.3. Bio-Meteorological Analysis

Daily meteorological data for the 1980–2009 period were collected from the meteorological Institute for the synoptic stations of Bao-Loc, Phan Thiet and Phan Rang (Figure 2) that represent forested hills, lowland agricultural plains, and a desertified coastal zone, respectively. The potential evapotranspiration (PET) was calculated using the modified Penman–Monteith equation [58]. The aridity index (AI) or the ratio between rainfall (P) and PET [59] and the length of the growing period (LGP) [60] were calculated for the three stations. Drylands are distinguished using LGP when both rainfall and evapotranspiration permit annual crop growth. Arid drylands have 1–74 growing days, semi-arid 75–119 and dry sub-humid 120–180 [60]. In addition, climates in drylands are characterised by low and variable rainfall that translates into variable production.

2.4. Spatial Database on Land Use/Cover

Data from the General Statistics Office [29], geodata and reports were collected from several provincial and district departments and combined in a geodatabase. Data processing consisted of establishing a common coordinate system and improving data quality through communication with the different departments where the data originated from. Thematic spatial data layers were subsequently created for the administrative boundaries, land use/cover, soil resources, road networks, and water resources, including irrigation infrastructure. Statistics on population, economic activities, agriculture and forestry were tabulated for the administrative areas.
Since land cover/use changes constitute one of the major drivers or explanatory factors of drought, land degradation and desertification [31,33], remote sensing offered a considerable potential for quantifying land cover changes in an objective manner. Time series of Landsat images are available from the Landsat archive of the United States Geological Survey [61]. Binh Thuan province was contained within Landsat path 123, row 52 and path 124, rows 52–53. Cloud-free Landsat-5TM and Landsat-8OLI images were selected to classify the land cover in the study area during the period of 1990–2019. Training samples were selected to derive distinct spectral signatures for each of the five major land cover classes by delineating polygons in representative visited sites (Appendix A). Supervised maximum likelihood classification was used to classify the different land cover classes for the years 1990, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2019. A kappa statistic [62] was used to assess the classification results. Spatial and temporal land cover changes were analysed for the major land cover classes: agriculture, forest, water and aquaculture, industry, settlement and bare land. In addition, Landsat images were used to distinguish between irrigated and non-irrigated agricultural land. All spatial analysis and map visualisations were achieved with QGIS [63].

2.5. Participatory Methods

In order to comprehend the impacts of land degradation, a field reconnaissance survey was organised to include a participatory land resource analysis [39], and transecting the major landscapes [38,64] within the province to elucidate the major differences in the region (Figure 2). Areas where land degradation occurred were part of the field observations. Informal interviews were conducted with farmers, fishermen and villagers. GPS positions were taken at observations of land degradation, vegetation, crops, water bodies and soil. Open-ended informal interviews were administered to elucidate mitigation measures and adaptation options.
At all of the 10 districts, key informants were interviewed to assess land degradation and elucidate pressures and adaptation strategies. Key persons were district officials, provincial authorities, local scientists, irrigation experts and water board officials. Stakeholder workshops were held to discuss the results and findings with the provincial and district departments of science, technology and environment, agriculture, forestry, natural resources and mining, and the water board.
The impacts of land degradation on socio-economic status were assessed using in-depth family and community questionnaires. The sample included 208 family interviews with one family member and 29 community interviews with the leader of each commune. The main items addressed in the community questionnaires were general information (area, population, land use), infrastructure (transportation, electricity, school), distribution of labour in the commune according to types of economic activities, quality of life (main water sources, household commodities, living standard), and activities to reduce poverty. The main topics of the household questionnaires were general information (number of people, main income), total compound area and economic activities (agriculture, fishery), main water source used and purpose, and annual household income and expenditure. The interviews were carried out on a voluntary basis.
Vulnerability indicators were elucidated during the interviews and compared at the household, commune and district levels. These indicators were subsequently related to land degradation using a Spearman correlation analysis.

3. Results

The first section illustrates the patterns of land degradation (Section 3.1). All the other sections follow the different components of the framework (Figure 1), starting with a section on the drivers of land degradation (Section 3.2). This is followed by a description of current land use types, land cover and its changes since 1990 as pressures of land degradation (Section 3.3). The next section explores the impacts and vulnerability of local land users at the household, community and district levels (Section 3.4). The last section discusses adaptation strategies for coping with land degradation (Section 3.5).

3.1. Patterns of Land Degradation

The contrasting environments, from desert-like sand dunes near the coast to rice-based agriculture on the plains and lush humid forest in the north and west, resulted in different forms of land degradation along the transect (Figure 1 and Figure 3, Table 2). The different forms of land degradation covered 90,000 ha or 11.5% of Binh Thuan’s land surface in 2010. The area under severe land degradation included shifting sand dunes (63%), degraded land due to ravine and gully erosion (14%), saline areas (13%), and rock outcrops on the lowland plains (10%).
There was a clear relation between the vegetation, soil, land management, dominant agricultural crops and the different forms of land degradation (Table 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).
Sandy soils (Arenosols) developed on sandstone formations as part of a 1259-km2 coastal dune complex (Figure 4) with spectacular gullying and ravine erosion. The very low water holding capacity of Ferralic Arenosols encouraged the cultivation of drought-tolerant crops such as cassava, cashew and mango. Due to low rainfall, there was little surface runoff and the ability to recharge the groundwater was limited. Lakes and ponds were reported to have decreased by 50 cm in depth in the past six decades. In addition, the groundwater was becoming saline since exploitation leads to the intrusion of marine water. Cactus-like vegetation, coconut groves, grasses, dry shrubs and coniferous trees alternated between sand dunes and barren countryside.
The alluvial plains along the major rivers consisted of Fluvisols (994 km2) and Gleysols (51 km2) (Figure 4). These alluvial soils had a variable texture from very clayey to very sandy depending on their position in the landscape and vicinity to the main river and were suitable for irrigated dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) and wetland rice (Oryza sativa). The natural vegetation included mangrove marshes at river deltas in the southern area and bamboo-dominant forests along seasonal streams (Figure 4).
Between the coastal dunes and the mountains, an undulating plain consisted of clay enriched subsoils (Figure 4), comprising Haplic Acrisols (1542 km2, 20% of the area), Luvisols (2210 km2 or 3% of the area) and Lixisols (96 km2, less than 2%). The highly weathered soils, with an increasing clay content in the subsoil were poor in nutrients and had a low binding and water-holding capacity. Regular droughts contributed to laterite formation. Saline soils (0.3% or 238 km2) occurred at the transition between sand dunes and plains. Soils accumulated salt as high evapotranspiration rates often exceeded rainfall. Salinisation and laterisation affected soil suitability, vegetation and agricultural land use. Elevations below 800 metres supported shrubs dominated by thorny trees as part of the dry coastal forest ecoregion (Figure 4).
The Rhodic Ferralsols in the mountains were highly weathered, red, clayey soils that covered 45% of the province or 3490 km2 and were mostly found in tropical, humid rainforests (Figure 4). Leptosols formed on granite outcrops and covered only 1.2% of the entire area (936 km2). The highly contrasting topography with sloping surfaces and high rainfall intensities during the rainy season triggered soil erosion, landslides, flash floods, leaching and waterlogging. The original vegetation was a mixture of evergreen, semi-evergreen and deciduous forest distributed over the hills and mountainous nature reserves. Near the mountain summits, a broadleaved evergreen forest of the humid tropics occurred, whereas a degraded and secondary deciduous broadleaved forest covered lower elevations (Figure 4).

3.2. Drivers of Land Degradation

3.2.1. Climate

Phan Thiet and Phan Rang stations displayed an annual negative water balance with an average deficit of 625 mm and 1030 mm, respectively, caused predominantly by a distinct dry season with virtually no rainfall (Figure 5). The dry season lasted around 9 months (263–311 days) in the northeastern sand dunes (Phan Rang, Figure 5), 6–8 months (179–243 days) on the lowland plains (Phan Thiet, Figure 5) and 0–3 months (0–110 days) in the mountains (Bao-Loc, Figure 5).
Monthly and daily 10-day precipitation showed a high variability in annual rainfall for the three stations (Figure 5). Rainfall ranged between 449–1332 mm in the driest regions (Phan Rang), 784–1768 mm on the lowland plains (Phan Thiet) and 2195–5262 mm in the mountains (Bao-Loc) between 1980 and 2009.
The average length of the climatological growing period (LGP in Figure 5) increased from 119 days in the northeastern dry zone around Phan Rang (AI = 0.27 to 0.70, semi-arid), to 183 days in the rice growing plains of Phan Thiet (AI = 0.44 to 0.99, dry sub-humid) and up to 365 days in mountainous Bao-Loc (AI = 1.5 to 3.99, humid) (Figure 5). A large variability was observed in the onset and end of the growing period between the different years, as evidenced by the error bars (LGP in Figure 5).
The monsoon was reported to arrive late more often and rainfall during the onset of the wet season became more erratic, causing a shift in the growing season. During the period of 1980–2009, there were between 5 and 6 dry months a year with rainfall below 5 mm/month and between 3 and 4 months with rainfall below 1 mm/month in Phan Rang. The topographical characteristics of the region created a micro-climate of localised semi-arid to arid areas, intensified by a long dry period of up to 9 months a year. Long sunshine duration, strong winds and an extended dry period have contributed to prolonged drought and subsequent land degradation processes. With an annual rainfall of less than 500 mm, the northeastern part of the province was the driest region, with sandstorms sweeping through the countryside during the dry season.

3.2.2. Population Dynamics

Bình Thuan province had a population of 1,239,200 people in 2018, corresponding to a density of 156 persons/km2. The population density ranged from 1085 persons/km2 in cities such as Phan Thiet to less than 67 persons/km2 in the most rural district of Bac Binh. The population had grown by 15.7% since 2000. Growth was particularly strong in the cities and towns at 1.0% per year. As a result, settlement areas increased by 43.5% between 2000 and 2018, and industry and services by 136.6%, making Binh Thuan one of the most urbanised provinces of the southeast coast of Vietnam.
Migration points to urbanisation and rural outmigration, which were not higher than in the entire country. A minor rural outmigration of 800 persons per year during the 2000–2010 period in the northern districts reflected the trend that (mainly) young people preferred to work in industry and major cities. Migration between rural and urban areas was explained by economic reasons such as the attraction of industry, increased tourism along the coast, or other service sectors. During the 2010–2018 period, the rural population increased by 5.3% and the urban by 5.4%. The net migration rates during the same period fluctuated from −5.4% to 0% in 2016–2017 and −1.6% in 2018 and showed an overall outmigration. The data, however, did not provide evidence for land degradation-induced migration.

3.3. Pressures of Land Degradation

3.3.1. Major Land Use Types

Forests occupied more than 60% of the area prior to 2000, almost 46% of the area in 2010 (Figure 6), and 43.3% in 2018 (Table 3): an overall decline of 29% during the 1998–2018 period. This decline was not evenly spread within the province. The Thanh Linh district lost 52% of its forest cover from 1965 to 1998, leading to drought and flash floods. Past deforestation in the 1970s increased agricultural production, and the inherently poor soil quality of predominantly sandstone originated soils resulted in desertification near the coast. During dry periods, the reliance and pressure on natural vegetation and forest resources increased, not just for wood and charcoal but also for wild edible and marketable forest products.
From 2008 onwards, sand dunes have been stripped of vegetation for titanium mining purposes, causing the expansion of sand dunes. In addition, water used for filtering titanium from sand and salt byproducts tainted the agricultural land and water resources due to salinity. The noise, dust and pollution adversely affected the tourist sector along the coast. On the other hand, the same tourist sector put a lot of pressure on freshwater resources and competed with household water supplies and irrigated agriculture.

3.3.2. Land Cover Change

The long observation period of the Landsat archive allowed us to identify five major land cover classes: forest, agriculture, water, industry and housing, and marginal land, with a kappa statistic between 0.81 and 0.95 for each land cover map. A further distinction between cultivated and non-cultivated agricultural areas allowed for an analysis of natural resource use and irrigation development in the province.
With 46.2% of the total land managed by farmers in 2010 (Figure 6), agricultural land use almost equalled forested area (46.7%), as clearly confirmed by a land cover time series analysis using the Landsat archive (Figure 7, Figure A1 and Figure A3). The area for rice cultivation in 2010 declined by 7%, following the severe droughts of 2005. Rice production, however, did not decline due to irrigation and the subsequent possibility of growing a third crop for one year. Irrigated agriculture took place on 83,482 ha in 2010, mainly on Acrisols (56%), followed by Ferralsols (18%), Luvisols (14%) and Fluvisols (12%) (Figure 4 and Figure 6). Priority was given to irrigated rice as the major staple food crop. Suitable irrigation perimeters were identified mainly on Fluvisols (45%) and Acrisols (24%), followed by Luvisols (15%). Nearly 20% of the land was used to grow perennial crops. Irrigated dragon fruit has gained importance as a cash crop grown for both local consumption and export.
Land cover changes during the 1990–2019 period showed an increase in agricultural land cover from 33% in 1990 to nearly 50% in 2019 (Figure 7, Figure A1 and Figure A3). Between 1998 and 2018, maize (9405–9,573 ha) was, after paddy rice (78,571–125,207 ha), the most important staple food crop. Vegetables (25,189–22,128 ha) and oilseed crops such as sesame and peanuts (11,424–12,761 ha) were stable in terms of area, while cassava (5354–30,868 ha) increased enormously in terms of area and was mainly grown on light textured and poor soils. Fruit trees (4968–40,878 ha), of which dragon fruit formed the largest part, increased more than eightfold in terms of area.
Farmers cultivated, on average, 4 ha of agricultural crops, mostly rice (55% area) followed by maize, cassava, melon and sesame. With the increasing availability of irrigation infrastructure, most of the farmers preferred to increase their cropping intensity to three rice crops per year. Paddy production in the worst-affected districts of Thuy Phong and Bac Binh (Figure 2 for location) has more than quadrupled from 55,592 to 246,946 tonnes during the 1998–2018 period, while the planted area has declined by 14.5% between 1998–2018, but increased by 60% between 2010–2018, owing to irrigation. Cash fruit crops such as dragon fruit have also increased in the districts of Thuy Phong and Bac Binh from 236 ha in 2004 to 4460 ha in 2018.
The increase in agricultural area happened at the expense of forested area, which decreased from nearly 65% in 1990 to 43% of the province in 2019. Urban development, including settlements, industry and services, comprised 5% of the area in 2019, and quadrupled between 1990 and 2019. Water bodies increased sevenfold due to dam construction in the forested and humid northern area of the province and due to the rise in aquaculture in the plains. Marginal land included sand dunes and rock outcrops and covered less than 1% in 1990, with a 12% increase by 2019, mainly due to deforestation in the hills, while the sand dunes seem to have stabilised following revegetation programmes. Bare land covered only 8.5% of the total degraded land in the province and showed that pressure on the land is high.
Historical devegetation left the sandy areas near the coast to cope with intense heat, drought and flood cycles. Shifting sand dunes and gully formation were found to restrict land use development, threaten roads and buildings, and affect vegetation, habitats and agricultural productivity. The plains with clay soils and meandering streams hosted rice-based farming systems. Paddy rice occurred where rainfall and topography allowed the rice fields to be submerged during at least part of the growing season.

3.4. Impacts and Vulnerability

While drought and intense heat may have contributed to poverty in rural areas without access to water resources, particularly so in the east of the province, the west of the province was at risk of flooding and water erosion. Combined effects of drought and human activity increased natural resource degradation and ecological vulnerability, which, in turn, affected socio-economic vulnerability.

3.4.1. Vulnerability at the Household Level

The majority of households (n = 208, 66%) lived in larger villages or urbanised areas and relied on tap water. Bridging the dry season gap with the available freshwater resources remained a major challenge in rural areas. Dams and reservoirs supplied the cities, major villages and coastal areas with drinking water and hydroelectricity, and the plains with water for irrigation. Groundwater in the coastal areas was at risk of becoming saline due to high water demands and overexploitation.
Households of, typically, between five and eight people lived on a 0.1-ha compound that comprised a house, a home garden with fruit trees and vegetables (73% of compounds, n = 208), a pond and a patio. Rural families used well water (40%) and harvested rainwater (5%), but were at a disadvantage in comparison to those that benefitted from piped water near urban areas or from new water infrastructure in the rural areas.
Households reported an average yearly income of around EUR 4000, of which around 58% came from agriculture (crops, animal husbandry, aquaculture). The self-reported average annual income per household was higher than the official statistics and doubled in 2.5 years’ time, while the inflation rate was 18%. With incomes rising faster than inflation, investment was possible and contributed to the resilience of farmers looking for a solution to drought and land degradation. Significant variations existed according to the location and source of income. Income levels were higher in the coastal area due to aquaculture (mostly shrimps), fishery, tourism and cattle breeding. The majority of expenses were food, homestead maintenance, schooling and energy. The most popular investment was in housing and land acquisition, followed by boats and fishing equipment. Poor households had a monthly income per adult below EUR 18 in the cities or below EUR 14 in the rural areas. Between 0 and 32% of the households in the communes of the worst affected districts were poor, at an average of 12%, which is below the country’s average of 19%.

3.4.2. Vulnerability Indicators at the Household, Community and District Levels

Overall, there is a good agreement between the vulnerability indicators at the district (Figure 8A), commune (Figure 8B) and household levels (Figure 8C).
At the district level, a Spearman correlation analysis between vulnerability indicators and land degradation revealed that land degradation was positively related to population pressure and the share of rainfed arable and agricultural areas, and negatively related to the presence of surface water availability and paddy rice cultivation at the district level (Figure 8A). Remoteness, calculated as accessibility to major roads, and the share of agricultural land and forest to total surface area were weakly related to land degradation at the district level (Figure 8A).
The results at the community level (Figure 8B) showed positive correlations between land degradation and the number of households, the share of rainfed to agricultural land, and the share of non-paddy to agricultural land. Less degradation occurred in communities with higher shares of forest to total area, higher paddies to agricultural area, and higher ground and surface water availability. Incidentally, communities with less land degradation also had a larger share of the rural poor.
At the household level (Figure 8C), land degradation was negatively correlated to larger farm sizes, higher shares of paddy cultivation to farmed area and surface water availability for household use. Large farm sizes were associated with paddy cultivation. The homestead area had a weak negative correlation with land degradation. Household expenses were higher in the most degraded areas, but so were household incomes. The household finances indicated that there were economic opportunities in the worst affected areas (Figure 8C). Across the district, community and household levels (Figure 8), the share of paddy cultivation, access to water resources and the share of forested area were related to less land degradation, whereas population density and rainfed non-paddy agriculture were linked to more land degradation.

3.5. Adaptation Strategies

Efforts to combat land degradation in the Binh Thuan province included sand dune stabilisation through the replanting of affected areas with adapted tree species and the construction of dams for water supply to the worst affected areas. The government planted more forests along the coast with trees that helped stabilise sand dunes, such as casuarina (Casuarina equisetifolia), cashew (Anacardium occidentale) and China trees (Melia azedarach). New drought-tolerant tree crops such as Jatropha and Sterculia were also introduced. The sand dunes offered opportunities for tourism with colourful canyon-like ravines. On sandy soils, a shift to drought-tolerant crops such as cassava and cashew has occurred. Lucrative lizard farms in the dry sandy areas produced valuable meat for consumption.
Binh Thuan province had 484,190 hectares of forest area in 1998, covering 60% of its natural land area (Table 3); the forest cover declined by 32% between 1990–2019 according to Landsat imagery analysis (Figure 7 and Figure A1). The province is one of six localities that are implementing the United Nations Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UN-REDD) in Vietnam, aimed at increasing carbon reserves through better forest resource management. The programme is mainly directed towards forest protection in hilly and mountainous communities.
On the lowland plains and hills, mitigation and adaptation efforts included land, water and soil resource management to prevent salinisation, laterite formation and erosion. At all levels of decision making (farm, village, district and province), many efforts were undertaken to cope with prolonged dry periods and bridge the dry season with the water resources available. These efforts included the construction of household water jars for rainwater harvesting from roofs by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Several dams were constructed to produce hydroelectricity, supply water to households and industry, and support irrigated agriculture.
The availability of irrigation water was more influential than drought impacts on the cultivated area and its production. Adaptation options included the installation of reservoir dams for water supply to cities, households and agriculture. The irrigated area of crops increased from 46,160 ha in 2005 to 119,100 ha in 2015. The annual rice production increased from 333,408 tonnes in an area of 84,568 ha in 2005 to 717,848 tonnes in 124,188 ha in 2017, owing mainly to the possibility of an additional crop per year. Water availability for irrigation resulted in three rice crops per year, but exerted a tremendous pressure on water resources.
Extension services focused on agriculture and water resource development with the introduction of opportunity cash crops to alleviate crop water demands. Less water-demanding crops such as dragon fruit were increasingly grown near rivers and streams under sprinkler or furrow irrigation. The area planted with dragon fruit increased almost exponentially from 5799 ha in 2005 to 13,404 ha in 2010 and 26,069 ha in 2015, while annual production rose from 96,806 in 2005 to 299,302 in 2010 and 468,355 tonnes in 2015. The soils were fertilised by animal manure at the base of the individual plants. In fields where rice paddies were converted into dragon fruit plantations, the soil had a compacted layer at around 0.3 m, resulting in shallow rooting depths with frequent requirements for water during droughts. Climate smart precision farming with solar power systems to regulate drip irrigation and artificial lighting to extend daylight hours were used to boost dragon fruit production for export.

4. Discussion

The paradigm shift of including degradation processes, the context of ecosystem deterioration and the integration between human and natural factors has broadened the definition of desertification [65]. The attention has subsequently shifted to land degradation [66], so that an increased number of countries have ratified the Convention on Combating Desertification, such as Vietnam in 1998. According to the atlas of desertification [59], the area with an aridity index lower than 0.65 equals 1233 km2 or 15% of the Binh Thuan Province versus 11.5% of the total area affected by desertification, as calculated by [31]. The areas affected by land degradation in the province cover a larger area.
Elucidating the drivers that cause land degradation is a prerequisite to further establishing monitoring and assessment systems [7]. The drivers in southeast Vietnam are related to climate (distinct dry season, dry land winds) and demographic dynamics. Vietnam is often characterised as a country with a high exposure and sensitivity to climate change effects [30]. Signs exist of long-term changes to the dry season with a projected longer duration due to further delays in the onset of the growing season and an increase in temperature of 1.6–2.5 °C by 2100 [67]. There is a statistically significant increase of +0.30 °C for Tmin, +0.15 °C for Tmax and +0.22 °C for Tmean per decade, which will increase evaporation rates. With projected climate change and population growth, desertification is projected to increase by 122% by 2050 [31]. Delays in the wet season in individual years occurred, in part, due to the large variations in the 30 years examined. In a dry sub-humid climate, there is a difference between “occasional droughts due to seasonal or inter-annual variations in rainfall” and “long-term droughts”. People can adapt more easily to the former than to the latter.
The pressures included natural resources (e.g., Arenosol, Solonetz, Leptosol) and their management (e.g., salt intruded groundwater, laterisation), land use (agriculture, mining) and changes in land use/cover (e.g., deforestation). These pressures and their impact constitute ecological vulnerability [28], in relation to which action can be taken. The effective monitoring of pressures must include remote sensing archives [52] and encourage stakeholder participation [51]. Policy efforts in Vietnam include increasing forest coverage through the REDD+ mechanism [68], developing and monitoring water supply systems [69], encouraging sustainable farming practices [70], and reducing poverty in affected areas [71]. A time series reconstruction and analysis of land use/cover during the 1990–2019 period demonstrated the importance of natural resource management in land degradation. The pressure on water resources for the irrigated farming of rice and dragon fruit, the mining industry and tourism are high, particularly because of the proximity of Ho Chi Minh City. Only coarse inventories of current water resources are known, their use or potential to bridge the dry season and their limitations are less well known. For example, salt intrusion into groundwater is reported in coastal areas, but the extent of the problem is unknown.
Slowly progressing drought and land degradation allow for their management and increase resilience. People who can adapt to drought and land degradation will do so mostly through private decisions: by planting different crops or by seeking other employment opportunities and moving house. Even with better crops, better soil and water conservation, better planting patterns and better weather forecasts, all of which are needed, there will still be regional calamities. Within this context, Binh Thuan emerges as a region with a high human ecological resilience. This is strengthened by flexibility in crop selection, a stable population, investment in irrigation logistics, and the financial strength of the province and its inhabitants. Adaptations of the traditional land use regimes such as farming new crops and aquaculture have a role in the transition processes of adaptation. The best protection against land degradation was prosperity, as we elucidated through interviews and questionnaires. Wealthier, healthier people are better able to deal with higher food prices, or invest in new farming techniques such as irrigation, or seek other opportunities. Weaker elements, according to this analysis, entail the lack of expansion opportunities for new agricultural areas and the limited private investments in agriculture. On the other hand, agriculture is more vulnerable to land degradation, whereas industry and services are not. The region’s relative prosperity is related to its location along Vietnam’s major national route, connecting major cities along a north–south axis, and providing a fast connection to the major markets of the heavily populated Ho Chi Minh City. A comprehensive strategy to cultivate less water-demanding crops, combined with the efficient use of irrigation water, integrated with rational water use in households, tourism and other industrial sectors, are part of the adaptation plan.
Pressures on natural resources such as vegetation and soil need monitoring, particularly in the wake of climate adaptation to land degradation [28,53,55]. Improved natural resource management has set examples for combatting recurrent ecological drought [16] and desertification [72]. The concept of eco-tourism to combine local subsistence with sustainable tourism [73] has great potential in the province, and has been successfully implemented in Northern Vietnam [74]. The provincial government has a role in monitoring, building a warning system to mitigate land degradation impacts in the rural areas and providing institutional capacity to an integrated policy of strategic natural resource management targeted to the different stakeholders. Further monitoring is also needed to investigate the limits of the current adaptation options. An integrated natural resource management policy requires the development of a spatially explicit decision support system as a comprehensive information platform to support decision making by different stakeholders in the province (e.g., farmers, the water board, planners, government officials, policy makers) and to provide scenario and impact analysis. A spatially explicit information platform may help with early warnings and support decision making by different stakeholders.

5. Conclusions

We developed an integrated framework to analyse the drivers of land degradation, its pressures and impacts, vulnerability and resilience, and adaptation options. Our methods combined participatory approaches, spatiotemporal data analysis, and time series Landsat image processing. These methods were tested on southeast Vietnam, which is severely affected by drought, land degradation and desertification.
The drivers of land degradation in southeast Vietnam are climate and demography. The pressures comprise land resource management and land use/cover change. The most vulnerable are farmers without access to natural resources and the rural poor. Reduced water availability has forced local farmers to adapt by growing less water-demanding crops such as dragon fruit. The relatively high income in the area allowed investments, increased resilience and seemed to counteract outmigration. The socio-economic impacts in the worst affected northeastern districts showed that, as a result of slowly progressing adaptation, no negative impacts on income, expenditure, and poverty were found. The vicinity to Ho Chi Minh City and the attraction of investments contributed to the province’s prosperity.
Policies include action programmes on reforestation, improved water supply for household use and irrigation, sustainable agriculture, rural development, and coastal zone management to combat land degradation. The majority of the national and local policies are supported by international programmes. However, the adaptation options and limitations warrant further research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G., P.Q.V., L.T.T.H.; methodology, A.G., P.Q.V., L.T.T.H.; validation, L.T.H., L.T.T.H.; formal analysis, L.T.H., L.T.T.H., A.G.; investigation, P.H.L., N.N.T., L.T.T.H.; resources, P.H.L., L.T.H., N.N.T.; data curation, P.H.L., L.T.H., N.N.T.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.; writing—review and editing, A.G., P.Q.V., L.T.T.H.; visualization, A.G., P.H.L., N.N.T., L.T.T.H.; supervision, A.G., P.Q.V., L.T.T.H.; project administration, A.G., P.Q.V.; funding acquisition, L.T.T.H., P.Q.V., A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology under decision nr. QD 1414/QD-BKHCN, dated 26/5/2020, and the Belgian Science Policy Office BELSPO (grant nr. BL/67/VT44) under an umbrella bilateral cooperation agreement between Vietnam and Belgium.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the People’s Committee of Binh Thuan Province; the Department of Science and Technology; the Department of Natural Resources and Environment; the Institute of Meteorology, Hydrology and Environment; and the Institute of Geography for contributing data and reports.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Landsat-5 and Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager 30 m resolution images covering the study area were downloaded (Table A1) from the U.S. Geological Survey (http://www.usgs.gov/) and combined to map the province (Figure A1). Training sites were selected to map the land cover classes: agriculture, forest, industry and housing, water and marginal land (Table A2). The training sites were selected such that their distribution reflected the spectral signatures of each of the land cover classes (Figure A2). The resulting land cover maps (Figure A3) confirmed the land use dynamics in the Binh Thuan province.
Table A1. Landsat Images used to classify land cover in Binh Thuan province (1990–2019).
Table A1. Landsat Images used to classify land cover in Binh Thuan province (1990–2019).
YearTiles
1990LT05_L1TP_123052_19900716_20170129_01_T1.tar
LT05_L1TP_124052_19901214_20170127_01_T1.tar
LT05_L1TP_124053_19901214_20170128_01_T1.tar
1995LT05_L1TP_123052_19951018_20180625_01_T1.tar
LT05_L1TP_124052_19950705_20170107_01_T1.tar
LT05_L1TP_124053_19950705_20170107_01_T1.tar
2000LT05_L1TP_123052_20000625_20161214_01_T1.tar
LT05_L1TP_124052_20001209_20161213_01_T1.tar
LT05_L1TP_124053_20001209_20161213_01_T1.tar
2005LT05_L1TP_124052_20050326_20161126_01_T1.tar
LT05_L1TP_124053_20050326_20161127_01_T1.tar
LT05_L1TP_123052_20050303_20161127_01_T1.tar
2010LT05_L1TP_124053_20100204_20161017_01_T1.tar
LT05_L1TP_124052_20100204_20161017_01_T1.tar
LT05_L1TP_124053_20100324_20161016_01_T1.tar
2015LC08_L1TP_124052_20150218_20170412_01_T1.tar
LC08_L1TP_124053_20150218_20170412_01_T1.tar
LO08_L1TP_123052_20150211_20170413_01_T1.tar
2019LC08_L1TP_123052_20190310_20190325_01_T1.tar
LC08_L1TP_124053_20190213_20190222_01_T1.tar
LC08_L1TP_124052_20190213_20190222_01_T1.tar
Table A2. Training sample sizes (n), total area of samples (ha) and minimum to maximum sample size (ha) for land cover classification purposes in Binh Thuan province for selected years (1990–2019). The locations of samples are provided in Figure A2.
Table A2. Training sample sizes (n), total area of samples (ha) and minimum to maximum sample size (ha) for land cover classification purposes in Binh Thuan province for selected years (1990–2019). The locations of samples are provided in Figure A2.
YearStatisticForestMarginal LandWaterAgricultureIndustry and Housing
1990n5323207120
total area84015193861105
min–max3.0–73.70.9–27.80.1–10.32.6–36.92.4–13.4
1995n77252211620
total area2069137541394135
min–max4.0–138.50.8–23.80.8–8.90.8–57.92.3–13.8
2015n47202313661
total area27691297204820635
min–max6.4–136.20.1–22.12.1–115.91.5–199.62.8–60
2019n4720379061
total area19141643501647635
min–max0.4–147.30.1–52.80.1–75.30.2–91.22.8–60
Figure A1. Landsat images of Binh Thuan province for selected years (1990–2019).
Figure A1. Landsat images of Binh Thuan province for selected years (1990–2019).
Land 09 00302 g0a1aLand 09 00302 g0a1bLand 09 00302 g0a1c
Figure A2. Training samples for land cover classification in Binh Thuan province for selected years (1990–2019).
Figure A2. Training samples for land cover classification in Binh Thuan province for selected years (1990–2019).
Land 09 00302 g0a2
Figure A3. Land cover maps of the Binh Thuan province for selected years (1990–2019).
Figure A3. Land cover maps of the Binh Thuan province for selected years (1990–2019).
Land 09 00302 g0a3

References

  1. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). Achieving Land Degradation Neutrality; Global Mechanism (GM) of the United Nations Conventions to Combat Desertification (UNCCD): Bonn, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee, B.X.; Kjaerulf, F.; Turner, S.; Cohen, L.; Donnelly, P.D.; Muggah, R.; Davis, R.; Realini, A.; Kieselbach, B.; MacGregor, L.S.; et al. Transforming our world: Implementing the 2030 agenda through sustainable development goal indicators. J. Public Health Policy 2016, 37, 13–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). Achieving Land Degradation Neutrality at the Country Level: Building Blocks for LDN Target Setting; Global Mechanism (GM) of the United Nations Conventions to Combat Desertification (UNCCD): Bonn, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cowie, A.L.; Orr, B.J.; Sanchez, V.M.C.; Chasek, P.; Crossman, N.D.; Erlewein, A.; Louwagie, G.; Maron, M.; Metternicht, G.I.; Minelli, S.; et al. Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality. Environ. Sci. Policy 2018, 79, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). Final Country Report of the Land Degradation Neutrality Target Setting Programme in Vietnam; Global Mechanism (GM) of the United Nations Conventions to Combat Desertification (UNCCD): Bonn, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  6. Geist, H.J.; Lambin, E.F. Dynamic causal patterns of desertification. BioScience 2004, 54, 817–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Winslow, M.D.; Vogt, J.V.; Thomas, R.J.; Sommer, S.; Martius, C.; Akhtar-Schuster, M. Editorial to Science for improving the monitoring and assessment of dryland degradation. Land Degrad. Dev. 2011, 22, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Horion, S.; Ivits, E.; De Keersmaecker, W.; Tagesson, T.; Vogt, J.; Fensholt, R. Mapping European ecosystem change types in response to land-use change, extreme climate events, and land degradation. Land Degrad. Dev. 2019, 30, 951–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Schwalm, C.R.; Anderegg, W.R.; Michalak, A.M.; Fisher, J.B.; Biondi, F.; Koch, G.; Litvak, M.; Ogle, K.; Shaw, J.D.; Wolf, A.; et al. Global patterns of drought recovery. Nature 2017, 548, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Quiring, S.M. Developing objective operational definitions for monitoring drought. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 2009, 48, 1217–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. D’Odorico, P.; Bhattachan, A.; Davis, K.F.; Ravi, S.; Runyan, C.W. Global desertification: Drivers and feedbacks. Adv. Water Resour. 2013, 51, 326–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gobin, A.M.; Campling, P.; Deckers, J.A.; Poesen, J.; Feyen, J. Soil erosion assessment at the Udi-Nsukka Cuesta (southeastern Nigeria). Land Degrad. Dev. 1999, 10, 141–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Grainger, A. The Threatening Desert: Controlling Desertification; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. Carrao, H.; Naumann, G.; Barbosa, P. Mapping global patterns of drought risk: An empirical framework based on sub-national estimates of hazard, exposure and vulnerability. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2016, 39, 108–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wilhite, D.A.; Glantz, M.H. Understanding the Drought Phenomenon: The Role of Definitions. Water Int. 1985, 10, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Crausbay, S.D.; Ramirez, A.R.; Carter, S.L.; Cross, M.S.; Hall, K.R.; Bathke, D.J.; Betancourt, J.L.; Colt, S.; Cravens, A.E.; Dalton, M.S.; et al. Defining ecological drought for the twenty-first century. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2017, 98, 2543–2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vicente-Serrano, S.M.; Gouveia, C.; Camarero, J.J.; Beguería, S.; Trigo, R.; López-Moreno, J.I.; Azorín-Molina, C.; Pasho, E.; Lorenzo-Lacruz, J.; Revuelto, J.; et al. Response of vegetation to drought time-scales across global land biomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Dai, A. Drought under global warming: A review. Clim. Chang. 2010, 2, 45–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wilhite, D.A.; Svoboda, M.D.; Hayes, M.J. Understanding the complex impacts of drought: A key to enhancing drought mitigation and preparedness. Water Resour. Manag. 2007, 21, 763–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Schlesinger, W.; Reynolds, J.F.; Cunningham, G.L.; Huenneke, L.F.; Jarrell, W.M.; Virginia, R.A.; Whitford, W.G. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 1990, 247, 1043–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gobin, A.; Campling, P.; Deckers, J.; Feyen, J. Quantifying soil morphology in tropical environments methods and application in soil classification. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2000, 64, 1423–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lal, R. Soils and food sufficiency: A review. In Sustainable Agriculture; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 25–49. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lal, R.; Hall, G.F.; Miller, F.P. Soil degradation. I. Basic processes. Land Degrad. Rehabil. 1989, 1, 51–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Barbier, N.; Couteron, P.; Lejoly, J.; Deblauwe, V.; Lejeune, O. Self-organized vegetation patterning as a fingerprint of climate and human impact on semi-arid ecosystems. J. Ecol. 2006, 94, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Smiraglia, D.; Ceccarelli, T.; Bajocco, S.; Salvati, L.; Perini, L. Linking trajectories of land change, land degradation processes and ecosystem services. Environ. Res. 2016, 147, 590–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Paustian, K.; Lehmann, J.; Ogle, S.; Reay, D.; Robertson, G.P.; Smith, P. Climate-smart soils. Nature 2016, 532, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Sivakumar, M.V.K. Interactions between climate and desertification. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2007, 142, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Webb, N.P.; Marshall, N.A.; Stringer, L.C.; Reed, M.S.; Chappell, A.; Herrick, J.E. Land degradation and climate change: Building climate resilience in agriculture. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2017, 15, 450–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. General Statistics Office (GSO). Socio-Economical Statistical Data of 63 Provinces and Cities; Statistical Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam, 1998–2018.
  30. MONRE. Climate Change and Sea Level Rise Scenarios for Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam. 2009. Available online: http://www.preventionweb.net/files/11348_ClimateChangeSeaLevelScenariosforVi.pdf (accessed on 24 July 2020).
  31. Hien, L.T.T.; Gobin, A.; Huong, P.T.T. Spatial indicators for desertification in southeast Vietnam. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2019, 19, 2325–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Hai, L.T.; Gobin, A.; Hens, L. Risk assessment of desertification for Binh Thuan Province, Vietnam. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2013, 19, 1544–1556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hai, L.T.; Gobin, A.; Hens, L. Uncovering causes and effects of desertification using a Leopold matrix in Binh Thuan Province, Vietnam. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2014, 12, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hai, L.T.; Gobin, A.; Hens, L. Select indicators and prioritize solutions for desertification and drought in Binh Thuan, Vietnam. Chin. J. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2016, 14, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gobin, A.; Nguyen, T.H.; Pham, Q.V.; Pham, T.T.H. Patterns of heavy rainfall in Vietnam and their relation with ENSO cycles. Int. J. Climatol. 2015, 36, 1686–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Gobin, A.; Jones, R.; Kirkby, M.; Campling, P.; Kosmas, C.; Govers, G.; Gentile, A.R. Indicators for pan-European assessment and monitoring of soil erosion by water. J. Environ. Sci. Policy 2004, 7, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Smith, K. Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster; Routledge: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gobin, A.; Campling, P.; Deckers, J.; Feyen, J. Integrated toposequence analyses to combine local and scientific knowledge systems. Geoderma 2000, 97, 103–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gobin, A.; Campling, P.; Deckers, J.; Feyen, J. Integrated land resource analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 53, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Xie, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Lv, T. A Bibliometric Analysis on Land Degradation: Current Status, Development, and Future Directions. Land 2020, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Borja, A.; Galparsoro, I.; Solaun, O.; Muxika, I.; Tello, E.M.; Uriarte, A.; Valencia, V. The European Water Framework Directive and the DPSIR, a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2006, 66, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, S.D.; Mueller, F.; Burkhard, B.; CAO, X.J.; Ying, H.O.U. Assessing agricultural sustainable development based on the DPSIR approach: Case study in Jiangsu, China. J. Integr. Agric. 2013, 12, 1292–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Svarstad, H.; Petersen, L.K.; Rothman, D.; Siepel, H.; Wätzold, F. Discursive biases of the environmental research framework DPSIR. Land Use Policy 2008, 25, 116–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Maxim, L.; Spangenberg, J.H.; O’Connor, M. An analysis of risks for biodiversity under the DPSIR framework. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Meybeck, M.; Lestel, L.; Bonté, P.; Moilleron, R.; Colin, J.L.; Rousselot, O.; Hervé, D.; De Pontevès, C.; Grosbois, C.; Thévenot, D.R. Historical perspective of heavy metals contamination (Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Pb, Zn) in the Seine River basin (France) following a DPSIR approach (1950–2005). Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 375, 204–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rounsevell, M.D.A.; Dawson, T.P.; Harrison, P.A. A conceptual framework to assess the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19, 2823–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Balzan, M.V.; Pinheiro, A.M.; Mascarenhas, A.; Morán-Ordóñez, A.; Ruiz-Frau, A.; Carvalho-Santos, C.; Vogiatzakis, I.; Arends, J.; Santana-Garcon, J.; Roces-Díaz, J.V.; et al. Improving ecosystem assessments in Mediterranean social-ecological systems: A DPSIR analysis. Ecosyst. People 2019, 15, 136–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Thornton, P.K.; Ericksen, P.J.; Herrero, M.; Challinor, A.J. Climate variability and vulnerability to climate change: A review. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 3313–3328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. McElwee, P.; Calvin, K.; Campbell, D.; Cherubini, F.; Grassi, G.; Korotkov, V.; Le Hoang, A.; Lwasa, S.; Nkem, J.; Nkonya, E.; et al. The impact of interventions in the global land and agri-food sectors on Nature’s Contributions to People and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2020, 26, 4691–4721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Schipper, L.; Pelling, M. Disaster risk, climate change and international development: Scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters 2006, 30, 19–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Reed, M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 2417–2431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Arnold, C.; Wilson, E.; Hurd, J.; Civco, D. 30 Years of Land Cover Change in Connecticut, USA: A Case Study of Long-Term Research, Dissemination of Results, and Their Use in Land Use Planning and Natural Resource Conservation. Land 2020, 9, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Keesstra, S.; Mol, G.; De Leeuw, J.; Okx, J.; De Cleen, M.; Visser, S. Soil-related sustainable development goals: Four concepts to make land degradation neutrality and restoration work. Land 2018, 7, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Liniger, H.; Harari, N.; Van Lynden, G.; Fleiner, R.; De Leeuw, J.; Bai, Z.; Critchley, W. Achieving land degradation neutrality: The role of SLM knowledge in evidence-based decision-making. Environ. Sci. Policy 2019, 94, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vogt, J.V.; Safriel, U.; Von Maltitz, G.; Sokona, Y.; Zougmore, R.; Bastin, G.; Hill, J. Monitoring and assessment of land degradation and desertification: Towards new conceptual and integrated approaches. Land Degrad. Dev. 2011, 22, 150–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vanwindekens, F.M.; Gobin, A.; Curnel, Y.; Planchon, V. A new approach for mapping vulnerability of agroecosystems based on experts’ knowledge. Math. Geosci. 2018, 50, 679–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ferrara, A.; Salvati, L.; Sateriano, A.; Nolè, A. Performance evaluation and cost assessment of a key indicator system to monitor desertification vulnerability. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 23, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Requirements, FAO, Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  59. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). World Atlas of Desertification, 2nd ed.; Middleton, N., Thomas, D., Eds.; UNEP: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  60. Fischer, G.; Nachtergaele, F.O.; Prieler, S.; Teixeira, E.; Tóth, G.; van Velthuizen, H.; Verelst, L.; Wiberg, D. Global Agro-Ecological Zones (GAEZ v3.0): Model Documentation; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA): Laxenburg, Austria; The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  61. Dwyer, J.L.; Roy, D.P.; Sauer, B.; Jenkerson, C.B.; Zhang, H.; Lymburner, L. Analysis ready data—Enabling analysis of the Landsat archive. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Smits, P.C.; Dellepiane, S.G.; Schowengerdt, R.A. Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: A review and a proposal for a cost-based approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1999, 20, 1461–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. QGIS.org. QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. 2020. Available online: http://qgis.org (accessed on 26 August 2020).
  64. Gobin, A.; Campling, P.; Deckers, J.; Feyen, J. Integrated toposequence analysis at the confluence zone of the River Ebonyi headwater catchment (south eastern Nigeria). Catena 1998, 32, 173–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zucca, C.; Della Peruta, R.; Salvia, R.; Sommer, S.; Cherlet, M. Towards a World Desertification Atlas. Relating and selecting indicators and data sets to represent complex issues. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 15, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chasek, P.; Safriel, U.; Shikongo, S.; Fuhrman, V.F. Operationalizing Zero Net Land Degradation: The next stage in international efforts to combat desertification? J. Arid Environ. 2015, 112, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Doutreloup, S.; Erpicum, M.; Fettweis, X.; Ozer, P. Analysis of the past (1970–1999) and future (2046–2065 and 2081–2100) evolutions of precipitation and temperature, in the Province of Binh Thuan, South East Vietnam, based on IPCC models. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Energy, Environment and Climate Change, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 26–27 August 2011; Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/2268/96759 (accessed on 24 July 2020).
  68. Hoang, M.H.; Do, T.H.; Pham, M.T.; Van Noordwijk, M.; Minang, P.A. Benefit distribution across scales to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) in Vietnam. Land Use Policy 2013, 31, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Firoz, A.B.M.; Nauditt, A.; Fink, M.; Ribbe, L. Quantifying human impacts on hydrological drought using a combined modelling approach in a tropical river basin in central Vietnam. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2018, 22, 547–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Affholder, F.; Jourdain, D.; Quang, D.D.; Tuong, T.P.; Morize, M.; Ricome, A. Constraints to farmers’ adoption of direct-seeding mulch-based cropping systems: A farm scale modeling approach applied to the mountainous slopes of Vietnam. Agric. Syst. 2010, 103, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hoang, T.X.; Pham, C.S.; Ulubaşoğlu, M.A. Non-farm activity, household expenditure, and poverty reduction in rural Vietnam: 2002–2008. World Dev. 2014, 64, 554–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Akhtar-Schuster, M.; Thomas, R.; Stringer, L.; Chasek, P.; Seely, M. Improving the enabling environment to combat land degradation: Institutional, financial, legal and science-policy challenges and solutions. Land Degrad. Dev. 2011, 22, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gulinck, H.; Vyverman, N.; Van Bouchout, K.; Gobin, A. Landscape as framework for integrating local subsistence and ecotourism: A case study in Zimbabwe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2001, 53, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tran, L.; Walter, P. Ecotourism, gender and development in northern Vietnam. Ann. Tour. Res. 2014, 44, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Methodological framework combining elements from Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) [36], chain of risk [37], integrated land resource analysis [38,39], and vulnerability assessment [28].
Figure 1. Methodological framework combining elements from Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) [36], chain of risk [37], integrated land resource analysis [38,39], and vulnerability assessment [28].
Land 09 00302 g001
Figure 2. (A): Location of Binh Thuan province in Vietnam, (B): location of the three synoptic meteorological stations (★) and the transect (+), (C): location of districts and communities.
Figure 2. (A): Location of Binh Thuan province in Vietnam, (B): location of the three synoptic meteorological stations (★) and the transect (+), (C): location of districts and communities.
Land 09 00302 g002
Figure 3. Transect showing major landforms and land degradation in relation to vegetation, soil, land management and agricultural crops. The location of the transect with its distance from west to east is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 3. Transect showing major landforms and land degradation in relation to vegetation, soil, land management and agricultural crops. The location of the transect with its distance from west to east is shown in Figure 2.
Land 09 00302 g003
Figure 4. Land degradation and natural resources of Binh Thuan province, Vietnam. (A): land degradation, (B): soil resources, (C): water resources, (D): natural vegetation.
Figure 4. Land degradation and natural resources of Binh Thuan province, Vietnam. (A): land degradation, (B): soil resources, (C): water resources, (D): natural vegetation.
Land 09 00302 g004
Figure 5. Bio-meteorological variability at Bao-Loc, Phan Thiet and Phan Rang for 1980–2009 (location see Figure 2). Pavg is average daily rainfall. Rainfall (P) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) are 30-year moving average values for rainfall and evapotranspiration, respectively. The length of the growing period (LGP) is the length of the growing period in days, error bars represent the range between the 10th and 90th percentile in start and end date. Note: the scaling of the y-axis is not equivalent for the three plots.
Figure 5. Bio-meteorological variability at Bao-Loc, Phan Thiet and Phan Rang for 1980–2009 (location see Figure 2). Pavg is average daily rainfall. Rainfall (P) and potential evapotranspiration (PET) are 30-year moving average values for rainfall and evapotranspiration, respectively. The length of the growing period (LGP) is the length of the growing period in days, error bars represent the range between the 10th and 90th percentile in start and end date. Note: the scaling of the y-axis is not equivalent for the three plots.
Land 09 00302 g005
Figure 6. Major land use types in 2010 in Binh Thuan province, Vietnam.
Figure 6. Major land use types in 2010 in Binh Thuan province, Vietnam.
Land 09 00302 g006
Figure 7. Land cover changes in Binh Thuan province derived from Landsat time series (1990–2019) (Appendix A). (A): forest and agriculture. (B): marginal land, water and industry and housing. Note: the scaling of the y-axis is not equivalent for the two plots.
Figure 7. Land cover changes in Binh Thuan province derived from Landsat time series (1990–2019) (Appendix A). (A): forest and agriculture. (B): marginal land, water and industry and housing. Note: the scaling of the y-axis is not equivalent for the two plots.
Land 09 00302 g007
Figure 8. Vulnerability indicators and Spearman correlation with land degradation. (A): at the district level, (B): at the community level where C refers to coastal area, L to lowland plains and M to hills and mountains, and (C): at the household level, aggregated to district name. Values are scaled as percentages of the maximum value, as given between brackets. See Figure 2 for the locations of districts.
Figure 8. Vulnerability indicators and Spearman correlation with land degradation. (A): at the district level, (B): at the community level where C refers to coastal area, L to lowland plains and M to hills and mountains, and (C): at the household level, aggregated to district name. Values are scaled as percentages of the maximum value, as given between brackets. See Figure 2 for the locations of districts.
Land 09 00302 g008aLand 09 00302 g008b
Table 1. Frameworks used in this study and their application domain across the world.
Table 1. Frameworks used in this study and their application domain across the world.
FrameworkApplication DomainRegion of InterestReference
Driver–Pressure–State–Impact–ResponseEnvironmental ImpactEurope, China[41,42]
BiodiversityAfrica[43,44]
Soil threatsEurope[36,45]
Ecosystem servicesEurope[46,47]
Chain of RiskClimate impacts and extremesGlobal[37,48]
Sustainable DevelopmentGlobal[49,50]
Integrated Land Resource AnalysisNatural resource managementWest Africa[38,39]
Environmental managementGlobal, USA[51,52]
Sustainable land managementGlobal[53,54]
Vulnerability AssessmentClimate and land degradationAfrica, Global[28,55]
Climate and vulnerabilityEurope, Africa, Asia[56,57]
Table 2. Major landforms and their natural resources, degradation and land use in Binh Thuan province.
Table 2. Major landforms and their natural resources, degradation and land use in Binh Thuan province.
LandformMountainsPlainsCoastal Zone
DegradationFlooding, erosionDrought, laterisation, salinisationDesertification, gully erosion, ravine erosion
VegetationForestWoodlots and shrubs
Bamboo dominant forest
Sparse vegetation, dunes
SoilRhodic Ferralsol, LeptosolLuvisol, Acrisol, Lixisol
Gleysol and Fluvisol
(Ferralic) Arenosol
Land managementAfforestationSoil and water conservation, irrigationRevegetation, soil conservation
Agricultural cropsUpland riceArable crops, fruit, vegetables
Dragon fruit, rice
Cassava, cashew, mango
Table 3. Area (in ha) of major land use types in Binh Thuan province (1998–2018), based on own analysis of statistical data [1].
Table 3. Area (in ha) of major land use types in Binh Thuan province (1998–2018), based on own analysis of statistical data [1].
199820002005201020152018
Agriculture234,707251,100287,707313,028362,176360,420
Water/Aquacultureunknownunknown21,05217,24514,97014,914
Forest484,190378,268393,840364,758344,355343,954
Industry18,01121,40643,53849,64548,80250,644
Settlement596563316972776787339083
Marginal Land125,404125,74157,96225,99611,87111,491
Total 794,393

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gobin, A.; Hien, L.T.T.; Hai, L.T.; Linh, P.H.; Thang, N.N.; Vinh, P.Q. Adaptation to Land Degradation in Southeast Vietnam. Land 2020, 9, 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090302

AMA Style

Gobin A, Hien LTT, Hai LT, Linh PH, Thang NN, Vinh PQ. Adaptation to Land Degradation in Southeast Vietnam. Land. 2020; 9(9):302. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gobin, Anne, Le Thi Thu Hien, Le Trinh Hai, Pham Ha Linh, Nguyen Ngoc Thang, and Pham Quang Vinh. 2020. "Adaptation to Land Degradation in Southeast Vietnam" Land 9, no. 9: 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop