Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Solar Energy Capacity Across Europe: Comparative Analysis of Production and Consumption Data
Previous Article in Journal
Land-Cover Responses to Reservoir Water-Level Regulation in the Danjiangkou Reservoir Shore Zone, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Methodological Approaches to Assess the Resilience of Farming Systems to Climate Change: Examples from Latin America
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Nature-Based Experience and Quality of Life in Mongolia and Rural South Korea: A Context-Dependent Perspective on Natural Resource Use

1
Department of Forest Resources, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-ro, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea
2
Center for Specialized University Project, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-ro, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2026, 15(6), 1043; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15061043 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 April 2026 / Revised: 30 May 2026 / Accepted: 10 June 2026 / Published: 12 June 2026

Abstract

This study examines how nature-based experience is associated with quality of life (QOL) under contrasting socio-ecological and labour-mobility-related conditions. Using an exploratory comparative design, survey data were collected from a Mongolian mobility-related sample in Ulaanbaatar and surrounding areas and from rural receiving communities in South Korea. Environmental values were measured using the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP), while nature-based experience was operationalized through visit frequency and duration of stay in natural environments. QOL was measured using items based on the WHOQOL framework. The results indicate clear differences between the two samples in environmental values, QOL, and patterns of nature-based experience. More importantly, the association between nature-based experience and QOL was not uniform across contexts. Visit frequency was positively associated with QOL in the Mongolian sample, whereas no comparable association was observed in the South Korean sample. By contrast, duration of stay did not show a comparable significant interaction effect. These findings suggest that the well-being relevance of nature-based experience may depend on the socio-ecological role of nature in each context. Given the use of convenience sampling, cross-sectional data, and the absence of full measurement invariance testing, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory comparative evidence rather than as statistically generalizable national-level conclusions. The study contributes to land-use, rural development, and socio-ecological research by highlighting the context-dependent relationship between natural resource use, human–nature experience, and QOL.
Keywords: nature-based experience; quality of life; socio-ecological context; rural territories; cross-national comparison nature-based experience; quality of life; socio-ecological context; rural territories; cross-national comparison

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, J.-h.; Joo, J.-h. Nature-Based Experience and Quality of Life in Mongolia and Rural South Korea: A Context-Dependent Perspective on Natural Resource Use. Land 2026, 15, 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15061043

AMA Style

Lee J-h, Joo J-h. Nature-Based Experience and Quality of Life in Mongolia and Rural South Korea: A Context-Dependent Perspective on Natural Resource Use. Land. 2026; 15(6):1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15061043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Ju-hyoung, and Jae-hwan Joo. 2026. "Nature-Based Experience and Quality of Life in Mongolia and Rural South Korea: A Context-Dependent Perspective on Natural Resource Use" Land 15, no. 6: 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15061043

APA Style

Lee, J.-h., & Joo, J.-h. (2026). Nature-Based Experience and Quality of Life in Mongolia and Rural South Korea: A Context-Dependent Perspective on Natural Resource Use. Land, 15(6), 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15061043

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop