Next Article in Journal
Rural Collective Land Expropriation in China: Historical Evolution, Institutional Attributes, and Reform Pathways
Previous Article in Journal
Unveiling the Spatial Non-Stationarity Between Built Environment and External Relations in Small Towns Using MGWR and Mobile Phone Data: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Source Apportionment and Risk of Soil Heavy Metals in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Major Function-Oriented Zone

1
School of Geographic and Environment, Jiangxi Normal University, Nanchang 330027, China
2
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Beijing 100020, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2026, 15(4), 661; https://doi.org/10.3390/land15040661
Submission received: 5 March 2026 / Revised: 29 March 2026 / Accepted: 10 April 2026 / Published: 17 April 2026

Abstract

Managing soil heavy metal pollution is pivotal for the sustainable development of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) urban agglomeration. This study integrated geostatistical methods, Principal Component Analysis, and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) to characterize “source–sink” dynamics across diverse Main Functional Zones. Results revealed distinct pollution landscapes: Key Development Zones exhibited high-risk accumulation driven by multi-source superposition, while Ecological-restricted Zones, despite overall low pollution levels, faced significant anomalous enrichment of Cadmium (Cd). Source apportionment confirmed that this spatial differentiation stems from the coexistence of “in situ accumulation” and “source–sink misalignment” mechanisms. The former is driven by high-intensity industrial agglomeration, whereas the latter is governed by cross-boundary atmospheric transport and the topographic blocking of emissions from the plains. This research demonstrates for the first time the joint shaping effect of national spatial planning and natural geographical processes on regional pollution patterns. Accordingly, a precise management framework incorporating source reduction, cross-boundary synergy, and spatial reorganization is proposed, providing a new paradigm for addressing environmental risks caused by unbalanced development in rapidly urbanizing regions.
Keywords: soil heavy metals; source apportionment; risk assessment; main functional areas; zoned management soil heavy metals; source apportionment; risk assessment; main functional areas; zoned management

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, H.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Z. Source Apportionment and Risk of Soil Heavy Metals in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Major Function-Oriented Zone. Land 2026, 15, 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15040661

AMA Style

Hu H, Guo Y, Zhou Y, Wang Z. Source Apportionment and Risk of Soil Heavy Metals in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Major Function-Oriented Zone. Land. 2026; 15(4):661. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15040661

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Hanyue, Yu Guo, Yongkang Zhou, and Zhenbo Wang. 2026. "Source Apportionment and Risk of Soil Heavy Metals in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Major Function-Oriented Zone" Land 15, no. 4: 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15040661

APA Style

Hu, H., Guo, Y., Zhou, Y., & Wang, Z. (2026). Source Apportionment and Risk of Soil Heavy Metals in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Major Function-Oriented Zone. Land, 15(4), 661. https://doi.org/10.3390/land15040661

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop