This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a National Park: Participatory Mapping in Latvia
by
Aiga Spage
Aiga Spage *
and
Madara Markova
Madara Markova
Institute of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Forest and Environmental Sciences, , Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(9), 1822; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091822 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 July 2025
/
Revised: 20 August 2025
/
Accepted: 5 September 2025
/
Published: 6 September 2025
Abstract
Cultural ecosystem services (CES) represent the non-material relationships between people and nature, yet their intangible nature poses challenges for spatial planning and policy integration. This study examines CES in Gauja National Park, Latvia, focusing on symbolic, sacred, educational, and cultural heritage values—types often underrepresented in CES assessments. Using a Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PGIS) approach, a map-based public survey was conducted via ArcGIS Survey123, enabling respondents to mark and describe places of personal significance. While widely applied internationally, PGIS remains rarely used in Latvia, especially in planning and municipal decision-making. This study explores the use of the PGIS method for the assessment of CES, serving as a pilot application to test its suitability and potential for integration into spatial planning. Points of value were successfully georeferenced and reflect diverse associations. While well-known heritage sites were commonly mentioned, respondents also identified personally meaningful locations, sometimes situated outside the park’s formal boundaries. The findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of digital participatory methods, including issues related to response rates, accessibility, and digital literacy. The study demonstrates that mapping CES with PGIS can offer valuable insights for inclusive landscape governance and supports the incorporation of local perspectives into spatial planning.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Spage, A.; Markova, M.
Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a National Park: Participatory Mapping in Latvia. Land 2025, 14, 1822.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091822
AMA Style
Spage A, Markova M.
Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a National Park: Participatory Mapping in Latvia. Land. 2025; 14(9):1822.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091822
Chicago/Turabian Style
Spage, Aiga, and Madara Markova.
2025. "Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a National Park: Participatory Mapping in Latvia" Land 14, no. 9: 1822.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091822
APA Style
Spage, A., & Markova, M.
(2025). Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a National Park: Participatory Mapping in Latvia. Land, 14(9), 1822.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091822
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.