Next Article in Journal
AeroHydro Culture: An Integrated Approach to Improve Crop Yield and Ecological Restoration Through Root–Microbe Symbiosis in Tropical Peatlands
Previous Article in Journal
Route Choice of Spanish Adolescent Walking Commuters: A Comparison of Actual and Shortest Routes to School
Previous Article in Special Issue
National Inventory and Morphological Analysis of Urban Squares in Hungary
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a National Park: Participatory Mapping in Latvia

Institute of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Forest and Environmental Sciences, , Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(9), 1822; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091822 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 July 2025 / Revised: 20 August 2025 / Accepted: 5 September 2025 / Published: 6 September 2025

Abstract

Cultural ecosystem services (CES) represent the non-material relationships between people and nature, yet their intangible nature poses challenges for spatial planning and policy integration. This study examines CES in Gauja National Park, Latvia, focusing on symbolic, sacred, educational, and cultural heritage values—types often underrepresented in CES assessments. Using a Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PGIS) approach, a map-based public survey was conducted via ArcGIS Survey123, enabling respondents to mark and describe places of personal significance. While widely applied internationally, PGIS remains rarely used in Latvia, especially in planning and municipal decision-making. This study explores the use of the PGIS method for the assessment of CES, serving as a pilot application to test its suitability and potential for integration into spatial planning. Points of value were successfully georeferenced and reflect diverse associations. While well-known heritage sites were commonly mentioned, respondents also identified personally meaningful locations, sometimes situated outside the park’s formal boundaries. The findings highlight both the strengths and limitations of digital participatory methods, including issues related to response rates, accessibility, and digital literacy. The study demonstrates that mapping CES with PGIS can offer valuable insights for inclusive landscape governance and supports the incorporation of local perspectives into spatial planning.
Keywords: cultural ecosystem services; participatory GIS; Gauja National Park cultural ecosystem services; participatory GIS; Gauja National Park

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Spage, A.; Markova, M. Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a National Park: Participatory Mapping in Latvia. Land 2025, 14, 1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091822

AMA Style

Spage A, Markova M. Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a National Park: Participatory Mapping in Latvia. Land. 2025; 14(9):1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091822

Chicago/Turabian Style

Spage, Aiga, and Madara Markova. 2025. "Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a National Park: Participatory Mapping in Latvia" Land 14, no. 9: 1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091822

APA Style

Spage, A., & Markova, M. (2025). Assessment of Cultural Ecosystem Services in a National Park: Participatory Mapping in Latvia. Land, 14(9), 1822. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091822

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop