Next Article in Journal
Framework Construction and Application of Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) in the Three-River-Source National Park (TRSNP) in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Language Culture and Land Use: A Case Study of the Dialect Cultural Regions in Anhui Province, China
Previous Article in Journal
Integration of Historical and Contemporary Data Sources in Understanding the Extent and Types of Disruptions in the Syrdarya Delta Land Use/Land Cover
Previous Article in Special Issue
Developing Cross-Border Spatial Planning: Establishing a Common Understanding Through a Forthcoming European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation Between Galicia and Portugal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Carbon Footprint in Yangtze River Economic Belt

1
School of Public Policy and Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
2
Research Center for Transition Development and Rural Revitalization of Resource-Based Cities in China, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Land 2025, 14(3), 641; https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030641
Submission received: 21 February 2025 / Revised: 12 March 2025 / Accepted: 17 March 2025 / Published: 18 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Commons Governance and Sustainable Land Use)

Abstract

As an important engine of China’s development, the Yangtze River Economic Belt faces the dual contradiction of economic growth and ecological protection. Addressing the insufficient analysis of the spatiotemporal evolution and driving mechanisms of city-level carbon footprints, this study delves into the concept of carbon footprint from the perspective of ecological footprint theory and carbon cycle dynamics. Using ODIAC and NPP data, it systematically evaluates carbon footprints across 130 cities and examines their spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors using kernel density estimation and the Kaya-LMDI model. The results show (1) a significant growth trend in carbon footprint, with rapid expansion from 2000 to 2012, followed by fluctuating growth from 2012 to 2022; (2) a west-to-east “low–high” spatial pattern, where disparities have narrowed but absolute gaps continue to widen, leading to polarization; and (3) economic growth and urban expansion as the primary drivers of carbon footprint growth, while ecological land use pressure and carbon sequestration capacity played a major role in mitigation, with the impact of carbon sequestration foundations remaining limited. This study conducts precise regional carbon sink accounting and offers a new perspective on the quantitative analysis of carbon footprint drivers. The findings provide insights for low-carbon governance and sustainable urban development in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.
Keywords: carbon footprint; carbon sink; NEP; Kaya-LMDI carbon footprint; carbon sink; NEP; Kaya-LMDI

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shao, Z.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Geng, Y.; Zhai, X.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, J. Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Carbon Footprint in Yangtze River Economic Belt. Land 2025, 14, 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030641

AMA Style

Shao Z, Li X, Chen J, Geng Y, Zhai X, Zhang K, Zhang J. Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Carbon Footprint in Yangtze River Economic Belt. Land. 2025; 14(3):641. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030641

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shao, Zhehan, Xiaoshun Li, Jiangquan Chen, Yiwei Geng, Xuanyu Zhai, Ke Zhang, and Jie Zhang. 2025. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Carbon Footprint in Yangtze River Economic Belt" Land 14, no. 3: 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030641

APA Style

Shao, Z., Li, X., Chen, J., Geng, Y., Zhai, X., Zhang, K., & Zhang, J. (2025). Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Carbon Footprint in Yangtze River Economic Belt. Land, 14(3), 641. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14030641

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop