Changes and Transformations on the Coast Using the Example of Roses (Alt Empordà, Catalonia)
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authorsdear authors, the manuscript must be improved in the text and in organization of the paragraphs. the authors must clarify used methods regarding geomorphology, facies analyses and stratigraphical interpretation. Also results and discussions can be improved. you can find several comments and suggestions directly on the attached pdf file.
thank you
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
i am not qualified to assess of the quality of the neglish in this paper, but several sentences can be improved in the text and forms. i suggest to review the text by native english speaker.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDear authors,
I have read the manuscript (Changes and transformations on the coast. The example of Roses (Alt Empordà, Catalonia)). I think that this manuscript needs to be improved before it is published in Land.
I have these observations:
Abstract
The abstract shows that the structure of the article is adequate and informative. It describes the purpose and content of the paper.
The Keywords respond to the subject.
1. Introduction
The introduction correctly identifies the research problem and is adequate. The implications of the study are well developed in the research.
2. Materials and Methods:
This chapter should be revised, there are both methods and results. It would be better to cite other manuscripts in this chapter where the same methods have been used.
3. Results
The results are too short a part can be moved here from the methods
4. Discussion
The discussion is internally consistent and it has a conceptual base background. However, the authors do not examine a modern and recognised bibliography.
5. Conclusions
The conclusions presented provide new practical knowledge on the topic discussed.
More detailed comments are noted along the manuscript (attached file).
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for Authorsdear authors, the manuscript have been improved in the text and figures. i think that you can do another little effort considering still some corrections to the text and figures. you can find some suggestion on the atttached pdf file. after these corrections (minor revisions) the article can be published.
cordially
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear Reviewer,
Thank you very much, again, for your corrections. We have implemented the suggested vocabulary changes as well as the English corrections to the abstract. We prefer to keep the images separate as they were originally presented, but we have increased the size of the suggested images.
The authors
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsDear authors,
the changes made have made the paper suitable for publication.
Author Response
There were no changes to be made