Changes and Transformations on the Coast Using the Example of Roses (Alt Empordà, Catalonia)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

dear authors, the manuscript must be improved in the text and in organization of the paragraphs. the authors must clarify used methods regarding geomorphology, facies analyses and stratigraphical interpretation. Also results and discussions can be improved. you can find several comments and suggestions directly on the attached pdf file. 

thank you 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

i am not qualified to assess of the quality of the neglish in this paper, but several sentences can be improved in the text and forms. i suggest to review the text by native english speaker. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors,

I have read the manuscript (Changes and transformations on the coast. The example of Roses (Alt Empordà, Catalonia)). I think that this manuscript needs to be improved before it is published in Land.

 

I have these observations:

Abstract

The abstract shows that the structure of the article is adequate and informative. It describes the purpose and content of the paper.

The Keywords respond to the subject.

 

1. Introduction

 

The introduction correctly identifies the research problem and is adequate. The implications of the study are well developed in the research.

 

2. Materials and Methods:

This chapter should be revised, there are both methods and results. It would be better to cite other manuscripts in this chapter where the same methods have been used.

 

3. Results

The results are too short a part can be moved here from the methods

 

4. Discussion

The discussion is internally consistent and it has a conceptual base background. However, the authors do not examine a modern and recognised bibliography.

 

5. Conclusions

The conclusions presented provide new practical knowledge on the topic discussed.

 

More detailed comments are noted along the manuscript (attached file).

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

dear authors, the manuscript have been improved in the text and figures. i think that you can do another little effort considering still some corrections to the text and figures. you can find some suggestion on the atttached pdf file. after these corrections (minor revisions) the article can be published. 

cordially  

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

Thank you very much, again, for your corrections. We have implemented the suggested vocabulary changes as well as the English corrections to the abstract. We prefer to keep the images separate as they were originally presented, but we have increased the size of the suggested images.

The authors

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors,

 

the changes made have made the paper suitable for publication.

Author Response

There were no changes to be made