Skip to Content
LandLand
  • Review
  • Open Access

21 October 2021

27 Pages

Review of Experience in Recent Studies on the Dynamics of Land Urbanisation

and
Department of Socio-Economic Geography, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Prawocheńskiego 15, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Urbanisation Dynamics Research

Abstract

Urbanisation rapidly accelerated in the 20th century. Along with the increasing dynamics of this phenomenon, the desire to know its origins and its course as well as to anticipate its effects is also growing. Investigations into the mechanisms governing urbanisation have become the subject of numerous studies and research projects. In addition, there has been a rapid increase in the number of tools and methods used to track and measure this phenomenon. However, new methods are still being sought to identify changes in space caused by urbanisation. Some of the indicators of urbanisation processes taking place include quantitative, qualitative and structural changes in land use, occurring at a certain time and place. These processes, related to human activity at a given time and in a given area, are determined by spatial diffusion, usually spreading from the city center towards the peripheral zones. Changes in land use involve the transition from less intensive to more intensive forms of land use. The constant effort to acquire new land for development, the search for alternative solutions for the location of investments and the need to determine the correct direction of development generates the need to constantly apply newer methods in the study of the dynamics of urbanisation processes. This paper presents an overview of recent studies and the most interesting—in the authors’ opinion—methods used in research into the dynamics of urbanisation processes. The main objective of the authors was to produce a compendium to guide the reader through the wide range of topics and to provide inspiration for their own research.

1. Introduction

Urbanisation is one of the most visible manifestations of global change occurring for anthropogenic reasons [1]. It can be defined as a process of population concentration, mainly in urban areas, which also determines the growth of the urban population and its share in the population of a given area. Urbanisation is described as a cultural and civilizational process reflected in the development of cities, the increase in their number, the expansion of their area, the progressive concentration of the population in their immediate vicinity, the expansion of non-agricultural sources of income, the acceptance and assimilation of urban standards, customs, etc. It is a complex and diversified process, taking place with differing intensity and speed and with different effects in various countries and regions of the world [2].
Urbanisation is both a process and a state [3]. As a process, it involves the changes in human activities and socio-economic behavior described above, etc. As a state, i.e., the result of a process, urbanisation most often refers to the number and size of urban settlement units, the proportion of the urban population in relation to the total population of the country or region (urbanisation coefficient), the concentration of the population in large cities or its dispersion, and the area occupied by city buildings [4]. These two dimensions are interrelated and are dependent on each other. It should also be noted that urbanisation is a global phenomenon, which is irreversible and inherent within human development. It is associated with the scientific and technological revolution, with the concentration of productive forces and forms of social relations, with the spread of the urban style of life, with changes in social relations and ties, with the transformation of the rural population into diversified non-agricultural groups and with the modernization of the entire settlement network [5,6].
Nowadays, urbanisation is approached as a multidimensional complex of economic, social, demographic, cultural and spatial events and phenomena leading to the growth of cities and an increase in the share of the urban population, the population concentration in spatially expanding urban areas, the concentration of economic and administrative activities generating an increase in the importance of cities, shaping specific cultural patterns of urban lifestyle and specific arrangements of landscape and architecture [7].
The study of urbanisation processes can be based on each of these dimensions. The demographic dimension of urbanisation is related to the increase in the number of city residents, caused both by rural population migration to cities and by natural growth in cities and the creation of new settlement units. With regard to rural areas, demographic urbanisation, especially in the suburban zones of highly developed countries, is related to the population outflow from cities to the countryside. The social dimension of urbanisation is expressed in the spread and deepening of the “urban lifestyle”, i.e., in attitudes, skills, behavioral patterns and even personality traits that are characteristic of metropolitan communities, both in the city area and in the countryside [8,9,10]. The economic dimension of urbanisation involves changes in occupational structure and employment. The occupational diversification of the population is becoming more pronounced in the city. The number of people employed in various services is growing at the expense of agriculture and crafts. The proportion of employment in traditional agricultural jobs is changing in rural areas in favor of non-farm jobs. All of the above dimensions of urbanisation are linked by spatial changes in the appearance and organization of the surrounding areas. Therefore, the spatial dimension of this phenomenon is one of the most interesting topics for research into the dynamics of urbanisation, since it provides a basis for inferring the causes and effects of the aforementioned aspects. The spatial dimension of urbanisation applies to both urban and rural areas. Spatial urbanisation is understood as the expansion of the urban landscape [11,12,13,14,15] and includes an increase in the urban investment area as well as the saturation of villages with urban-like infrastructure and buildings. In rural areas, spatial changes are associated with transformations in land use. The area of land used for farming is decreasing in favor of other, non-agricultural forms of use. Changes are taking place in the physiognomy of the buildings and the village morphology, as well as in the modernization of the technical infrastructure.
Current research primarily focuses on demographic and spatial urbanisation. It should be stressed that these are essentially just objectively separated manifestations of the same phenomenon. However, no spatial effects of urbanisation exist without demographic changes. The anthropogenic background of this phenomenon makes the demographic aspect an overriding factor in understanding the causes of spatial change. In practice, demographic urbanisation is measured and expressed, first of all, in the form of census-based statistics, the purpose of which is (at least in principle) is to distinguish the inhabitants of cities and towns from those living in rural areas [16]. The demographic dimension of urbanisation is related to the increase in the proportion of the urban population. Nevertheless, quantitative changes are also accompanied by qualitative ones. Changes are taking place in the gender and age structures of the population, the level of population growth, the balance of migration, the occupational structure of the population, the size of the family and its socio-professional status, and the size of the household, etc. [17] Accordingly, in recent studies, demographic urbanisation is examined in a much broader context, taking into account all the transformations occurring in demographic structures and processes, not only in quantitative but also in qualitative terms [4,18,19].
Spatial urbanisation is most often reflected in the rapid growth of cities, which has exerted pressure on land, local resources and especially on rural areas in their immediate vicinity [20,21]. The concentration of human activity in specific locations and regions favors the development of large cities and various forms of urban settlement [22]. Urban growth and transformation are driven by the forces of attraction between specific locations. This process of spatial diffusion results from interactions between multiple factors and contributes to the development of new spatial patterns [23]. This is primarily due to the specific topography of the city surroundings, the existing road network, the land ownership structure and the pace of its development. These changes are catalyzed by the development of transport networks, as well as the advantages arising from the spatial agglomeration of resources, including human resources. Urbanisation is viewed as a process of organic growth, starting in the city center and leading to the spontaneous formation of ‘mini’ urban areas, especially throughout the transport network [24]. The majority of these processes are very dynamic and cause rapid changes in the structure and organization of land use [23]. The process of urbanisation, particularly spatial urbanisation, requires the application of continuously evolving research methods and techniques, which render it possible to grasp its essence and pace. The aim of this paper is to present the most interesting, according to the authors, methods used in research on the dynamics of the spatial urbanisation processes. Sources of information employed in the analyses of urbanisation processes are described and a number of examples of the use of spatial data in analyses of urbanisation processes are presented. The solutions described apply to multiple countries and continents and the issue is a common one. Studies addressing this subject usually test new methods for a universal understanding of the urbanisation phenomenon. The added value of this paper is in the fact that it describes ready-to-use solutions in a single publication, in the form of data sources and their use in analysing urbanisation processes. This should facilitate the selection of an appropriate method and its application in research on the dynamics of urbanisation processes for many researchers. The paper presents an overview of recent research and the most interesting, according to the authors, methods used in research on the dynamics of urbanisation processes. The main aim of the article was to produce a compendium that would guide the reader through the wide range of topics and provide inspiration for their own research. The first chapter defines the concept of urbanisation. Chapter 2 presents demographic changes and the spatial dimension of urbanisation from a global perspective. Chapter 3 describes recent trends in research on urbanisation processes. Sources of information used in the analyses of urbanisation processes are described in detail in Section 3.1. Section 3.2 presents examples of applying spatial data in analyses of urbanisation processes. Section 3.3 examines the possibilities of using spatial data in the study of urbanisation processes. Discussion, conclusions and further directions for research are presented in Chapter 4.

2. Demographic Changes and the Spatial Dimension of Urbanisation from a Global Perspective

Demographic processes are the driving force behind urbanisation. According to data published in World Urbanisation Prospects—The 2018 Revision [1]—approximately 55% of the world’s population lived in towns and cities in 2013. It is projected that this value will reach 68% by 2050. This is due to changing lifestyles and a gradual reduction in agricultural employment in favor of the endogenous functions of cities [25]. According to the data published by the United Nations, two-thirds of the world’s population will live in urban areas (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Global urban and rural populations: historical and projected. Source: [1].
In the second half of the 20th century, urbanisation rapidly accelerated. Dynamic growth of cities was observed in the more developed regions of the world, such as Europe and later North America. Yet, in recent decades, it has been Asia that has been urbanising at a tremendous rate—it now has more than half of the world’s 40 megacities (with more than 10 million inhabitants). Africa is also gaining urbanisation momentum and now has three megacities in Cairo, Lagos and Kinshasa [26]. People migrate in search of a higher standard of living and the benefits of an urban lifestyle [27,28,29]. This process is particularly visible in Asia and Africa (90% urban population growth), where the highest rates of population growth are also found [30,31]. The migration of people to towns and cities was particularly high after 1950. From the level of 751 million, the urban population grew to 4.2 billion in 2018. It is predicted that by 2050 this number could rise by another 2.5 billion [32] (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Growth rates of urban agglomerations by size class. Source: https://population.un.org/wup/Maps/ (accessed on 2 August 2021).
Today, the most urbanised areas include North America (82% of the population live in urban areas), Latin America and the Caribbean (81%), Europe (71%) and Oceania (68%). Although these percentages are much lower in Asia (50%) and Africa (43%) in view of the relatively lower numbers of cities and towns, these are the areas with the largest cities (over 10 million) [1]. It is expected that by 2030, the number of cities with over 10 million inhabitants will rise to 43, while in 1970, there were only three such locations. The scale of these changes is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3. The projected growth of urban population and cities in 2030 compared to 1970. Source: https://population.un.org/wup/Maps/ (accessed on 2 August 2021).
Urban areas are the focal point of economic activity in most areas of the globe. Cities provide driving forces for development, bringing economies of scale, developing markets, creating jobs and encouraging new forms of business. As economies progress from basic activities—agriculture, fishing and mining—to industrial production and then services, the role of cities in the global economy expands with each transition. At present, about 55% of the world’s population (4.2 billion people) live in cities, and by 2050, almost 7 out of 10 people worldwide will live in urban areas. According to the figures provided by the World Bank, more than 80% of global GDP is generated in cities. Major urban areas, particularly in developed countries, are economic giants [33]. The 600 largest urban centres, with a fifth of the world’s population, generate 60 per cent of global GDP. The 380 largest cities in the top 600 in terms of GDP accounted for 50 per cent of global GDP [34].
Research studies conducted on the phenomenon of urbanisation are usually based on an analysis of statistical data concerning demographic and investment growth in administrative units. They are very significant as they clearly show the scale of the phenomenon. However, these studies often lack a spatial reference indicating the direction and the territorial extent of the changes.
The development of towns and cities is no longer controlled. The main reason behind this is the scale of economic and social change. The increased population mobility, the development of technology and the exchange of information have also resulted in city boundaries becoming indistinct [35]. The constantly growing urban population needs more space and the rate of growth results in a low level of space urbanisation processes [20,36]. This poses a serious threat to the spatial order and ultimately reduces the quality of this space and, consequently, the quality of people’s lives [37]. Housing land, which accounts for over 70% of land use in most urban areas, determines the form and density of cities, provides employment and contributes to their growth. Housing policy and the provision of adequate infrastructure to residents for their safety and health is one of the most important challenges for these cities. In addition, it should be remembered that the shortage of space causes price increases in the property markets, which leads to an increase in the number of residents living in extremely poor conditions or slums [22,38]. It is estimated that 881 million urban dwellers live in slums, a number that has increased globally by 28% in the last 24 years. Although the share of urban populations living in slums has declined over the past two decades, the number of slum dwellers continues to rise [24,39].
Forecasts show that the amount of urban land on Earth by 2100 may range from around 1.1 million to 3.6 million km2 depending on the approach and the application of sustainable development principles—Figure 4.
Figure 4. Projected growth of urban areas between 2000 and 2100. Source: https://population.un.org/wup/Maps/ (accessed on 2 August 2021).
Transformations of land use triggered by new human demand affects many aspects of the environment at spatial and temporal scales, including freshwater quality and availability, extreme precipitation and flooding, biodiversity and habitat loss, and global warming [40]. Although cities around the world are the driving forces for economic value creation and income generation, fulfilling an essential role in many aspects of society, the spatial changes they induce and do not control can pose a huge threat to human beings.
Uncontrolled urban growth is clearly visible in the surroundings of metropolitan cities and often results from insufficient space that can be allocated for investment purposes within the city to satisfy the needs of an economically and demographically expanding metropolis. The spatial dimension of urbanisation applies to both urban and rural areas, which is reflected in the amount of space used in a characteristic urban manner. Rural areas, in particular, are experiencing a constant transformation, which is caused by the interest in these areas of urban dwellers. These processes are usually very dynamic and produce rapid changes, based mainly on the principle of reorganisation of the structure of space, and manifest themselves as advanced suburbanisation and exurbanisation [35]. In the literature, this phenomenon has become known as ‘urban sprawl’, denoting the process of spreading and the enlargement of big cities [41,42]. This phenomenon is seen as a process resulting from socio-economic changes due to spontaneous and disorderly urban expansion [43]. For this reason, it is extremely important to monitor the direction, the level and the pace of spatial urbanisation. Urban sprawl is often measured by the population density gradient (as the percentage decrease in density over increasing distance from the city centre) [44] or by the spatial size of the urban area [45]. The analysis of these values shows a disproportionate increase in urban space to the increase in urban population [46].
Suburbanisation is of particular importance in a period of rapid urban growth. Areas under direct urbanisation pressure are described in the literature as the urban–rural transition zone [47,48], the urban–rural continuum [49,50,51,52,53] or the suburban zone [54,55,56,57]. Studies of these areas focus not only on the progressive integration of new land into the urban sphere of influence, but also on changing land use, the extent of infrastructure, access to services and markets, and exposure to urban production processes and environmental pollution [58]. Changes in land use in areas are referred to as a rural–urban fringe [59,60,61,62,63,64], in so-called “green belts” surrounding the city [65,66,67] and areas referred to as “urban villages” [68] are also explored. Areas under urbanisation pressure are also investigated in terms of investment attractiveness [69,70] or real estate market analyses [71,72,73,74,75].

4. Discussion and Conclusions

The dynamics of urbanisation processes have been the subject of multiple studies differing in both scale and aspect. Some interesting publications on this subject include works which are well known to researchers in this field, such as [102], but also some other very interesting items [103,104]. These include some studies that use land cover information, such as [105,106]. In the majority of these papers, the authors identify specific methods for environmentally, economically or demographically oriented research. Contrary to other manuscripts of this kind, this paper shows the wide possibilities of using spatial data to study urbanisation processes at different scales and with different underlying meaning.
The analytical methods and databases discussed above differ in their availability, ease of classification of selected land uses, labour intensity, cost, spatial and temporal continuity. Most frequently, they also require a specialised knowledge and dedicated algorithms to process the collected data. Automatic classification can result in errors in identifying and separating different land-use types when a large number of similar and overlapping land cover types are processed, such as single-family homes and multi-family housing. In view of the variety of colours, structures and textures in urban areas, spatial conditions in the vicinity of the identified areas should also be taken into account. The interpretation of aerial and satellite photographs alone is time-consuming and requires a team of several researchers. However, from a longer perspective, such analyses are less time- and cost-intensive and can be carried out on a large number of cities to generate sufficient data to draw conclusions concerning the degree and nature of urbanisation.
Urbanisation is a global phenomenon, irreversible and inherent within human development. The inevitability of these processes stimulated by developing cities requires systematic research into the characteristics and parameters that form them and the various processes of transformation taking place. Urban development significantly affects areas located at the interface between urban and rural uses, resulting in the permeation and overlapping of different land-use forms in the fringe zone. Spatial development of cities manifested by an increased demand for new land exerts a significant impact on the surrounding grassland and agricultural areas. The demand for new non-urbanised building land, much cheaper than property in cities, is triggering a response from municipal governments, environmentalists, farmers and the non-agricultural rural population. Identifying the specific nature of urbanisation processes occurring in and around cities can minimise the uncontrolled and unplanned creation of zones of chaotic development, degrading natural resources and could limit uncontrolled and unplanned city growth. This is also of fundamental importance in the context of sustainable urban development. New methods of urban management, environmental protection, uncontrolled suburbanisation, acquisition of new urban land (agricultural as well as post-industrial) transport, social participation, etc., are new challenges for sustainable urban areas and practices. Planning for sustainable urban development requires a knowledge of the individual elements of the city system and its surroundings and the relationships between them, the adoption of certain assumptions and goals leading to sustainability, and the adaptation of these assumptions to local conditions. This is particularly important from a spatial perspective [107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114].
Rapid urban growth and the resulting challenges require precise techniques for identifying and locating urbanised areas and for their mapping in order to represent complex land cover characteristics in adequate detail. Geospatial data provide a rich source of knowledge and a reference for the development of new tools for identifying and monitoring urbanisation processes. This applies in particular to areas subject to urbanisation pressures which cannot be clearly classified as urban or rural. These discrepancies are reflected in the existing land use and land cover types. For this reason, the degree and rate of urbanisation can be most effectively analysed by monitoring land cover changes. Virtually unlimited access to land cover data provided by current and historical orthophotomaps and databases, as well as developing GIS techniques, enable the rapid processing of spatial information. Research on spatial urbanisation consumes much less time and concerns a large number of cities, which may provide new sources for drawing conclusions about the scale and nature of this phenomenon.
The possibilities and constraints related to decision-making regarding the spatial development of the city are primarily attributable to the multidimensional nature of the spatial development space and its probabilistic and fuzzy nature. The variety of spatial features (attributes) and the wide range of data result in the process of investigating and planning a suburban area, which is complex and lengthy and, consequently, subject to high risk. Studies of urbanisation processes must take into account the nature of the explored component, characteristics, as well as the frequency, pace and magnitude of these changes. The analyses presented in this paper provide an attempt to further define current trends, methods, techniques and databases used in the analysis of the ongoing urbanisation processes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, A.B. and I.C.; methodology, A.B. and I.C.; software, A.B. and I.C.; validation, A.B. and I.C.; formal analysis A.B. and I.C.; investigation A.B. and I.C.; resources, A.B. and I.C.; data curation, A.B. and I.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.; writing—review and editing, I.C.; visualisation, A.B. and I.C.; supervision, A.B. and I.C.; project administration, A.B. and I.C.; funding acquisition, A.B. and I.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects—Population Division; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  2. Parysek, J. Duże Miasta Europy i ich rola w Procesie Urbanizacji, Rozwoju Społeczno-Gospodarczego i Europejskiej Integracji u Schyłku XX Wieku. Przegląd Geogr. Pol. Akad. Nauk. 1995, 67, 3–4. [Google Scholar]
  3. Müller, N.L. Brazil. In Essays on World Urbanization; Ronald, J.E., Ed.; George Philip and Son Limited: London, UK, 1975; pp. 212–222. [Google Scholar]
  4. Szymańska, D.; Biegańsk, J. The Phenomenon of Urbanizationand Processes Connected with It; Studia Miejskie; University of Opole Publishing House: Opole, Poland, 2011; Volume 4, pp. 13–38. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  5. Szymańska, D. Zjawisko Urbanizacji i jej Konsekwencje. In Badania Środowiska; Turło, J.E., Ed.; Wyd. Naukowe UMK: Toruń, Poland, 1995; pp. 71–79. [Google Scholar]
  6. Szymańska, D. Urbanizacja na Świecie; Wyd. Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2007; p. 392. [Google Scholar]
  7. Węcławowicz, G. Geografia Społeczna Miast. Zróżnicowania Społeczno-Przestrzenne; Wyd. Naukowe PWN SA: Warszawa, Poland, 2003; p. 163. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ziółkowski, J. Miejsce i rola procesu urbanizacji w prZeobrażeniach społecznych w polsce ludowej. In Procesy Urbanizacyjne w Powojennej Polsce; Nowakowski, S., Ed.; PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nowak, S. Obiektywne i Psychologiczne Parametry Przemian Struktury Społecznej; Materiały III Ogólnopolskiego Zjazdu Socjologicznego, z: Warsaw, Poland, 1967; p. 2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gałęski, B. Innowacje a Społeczność Wiejska; Wyd. Książka i Wiedza: Warszawa, Poland, 1971. [Google Scholar]
  11. Smiraglia, D.; Salvati, L.; Egidi, G.; Salvia, R.; Giménez-Morera, A.; Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, R. Toward a New Urban Cycle? A Closer Look to Sprawl, Demographic Transitions and the Environment in Europe. Land 2021, 10, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Divigalpitiya, P.; Nurul Handayani, K. Measuring the Urban Expansion Process of Yogyakarta City in Indonesia Urban expansion process and spatial and temporal characteristics of growing cities. Int. Rev. Spat. Plan. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 3, 18–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Meng, L.; Sun, Y.; Zhao, S. Comparing the spatial and temporal dynamics of urban expansion in Guangzhou and Shenzhen from 1975 to 2015: A case study of pioneer cities in China’s rapid urbanization. Land Use Policy 2020, 97, 104753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Antrop, M. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2004, 67, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Ramachandra, T.V.; Bharath, H. Aithal Durgappa, D. Sanna. Insights to urban dynamics through landscape spatial pattern analysis. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2012, 18, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Smailes, A.E. The Definition and Measurement of Urbanization, [w:] Essays on World Urbanization; Jones, R., Ed.; George Philip and Son Ltd.: London, UK, 1975; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  17. Szymańska, D. Geografia Osadnictwa; Wyd. Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  18. You, H. Quantifying the coordinated degree of urbanizationin Shanghai, China. Qual. Quant. 2016, 50, 1273–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Sato, Y.; Yamamoto, K. Population concentration, urbanization, and demographic transition. J. Urban Econ. 2005, 58, 45–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Biłozor, A.; Cieślak, I.; Czyza, S. An analysis of urbanisation dynamics with the use of the fuzzy set theory—A case study of the city of Olsztyn. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Wojtkun, G. Do Cities Really Expand? Czas. Tech. Archit. 2010, 107, 311–317. [Google Scholar]
  22. Mulder, C.H. Population and housing: A two-sided relationship. Demogr. Res. 2006, 15, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Cieślak, I.; Szuniewicz, K.; Pawlewicz, K.; Czyza, S. Land Use Changes Monitoring with CORINE Land Cover Data. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 245, 052049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. UN-Habitat, Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. 2016. Available online: https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  25. Montgomery, M.R.; Stren, R.; Cohen, B.; Reed, H.E. National Research Council. Cities Transformed: Demographic Change and Its Implications in the Developing World; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Pictet. The Role of Cities in the Global Economy. Available online: https://www.group.pictet/wealth-management/role-cities-global-economy (accessed on 2 September 2021).
  27. Weinstein, E. Migration for the benefit of all: Towards a new paradigm for economic immigration. Int. Labour Rev. 2002, 141, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Kruszyna, M.; Śleszyński, P.; Rychlewski, J. Dependencies between Demographic Urbanization and the Agglomeration Road Traffic Volumes: Evidence from Poland. Land 2021, 10, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Schneider, C.; Achilles, B.; Merbitz, H. Urbanity and Urbanization: An Interdisciplinary Review Combining Cultural and Physical Approaches. Land 2014, 3, 105–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Hou, B.; Nazroo, J.; Banks, J.; Marshall, A. Are cities good for health? A study of the impacts of planned urbanization in China. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2019, 48, 1083–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Güneralp, B.S.; Lwasa, H.; Masundire, S.; Parnell, S.; Seto, K.C. Urbanization in Africa: Challenges and opportunities for conservation. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 015002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. United Nations. The World’s Cities 2018-Data Booklet; Book Series: Statistical Papers-United Nations (Ser. A), Population and Vital Statistics Report; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. The World Bank. Urban Development. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/overview (accessed on 2 September 2021).
  34. Dobbs, R.; Smit, S.; Remes, J.; Manyika, J.; Roxburgh, C.; Restrepo, A. Urban World: Mapping the Economic Power of Cities. McKinsey Global Institute. March 2011. McKinsey & Company 2011. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Featured%20Insights/Urbanization/Urban%20world/MGI_urban_world_mapping_economic_power_of_cities_full_report.ashx (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  35. Cieślak, I. Identification of areas exposed to land use conflict with the use of multiple-criteria decision-making methods. Land Use Policy 2019, 89, 104225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Cieślak, I.; Biłozor, A.; Źróbek-Sokolnik, A.; Zagroba, M. The use of geographic databases for analyzing changes in land cover—A case study of the Region of Warmia and Mazury in Poland. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Wojtkun, G. Współczesne osadnictwo osiedlowe-aspekt metodyczny. Sr. Mieszk. 2009, 3, 159–161. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mikolai, J.; Kulu, H.; Mulder, C.H. Family life transitions, residential relocations, and housing in the life course: Current research and opportunities for future work: Introduction to the Special Collection on “Separation, Divorce, and Residential Mobility in a Comparative Perspective. Demogr. Res. 2020, 43, 35–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Caprotti, F.; Cowley, R.; Datta, A.; Broto, V.C.; Gao, E.; Georgeson, L.; Herrick, C.; Odendaal, N.; Joss, S. The New Urban Agenda: Key opportunities and challenges for policy and practice. Urban Res. Pract. 2017, 10, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Gao, J.; O’Neill, B.C. Mapping global urban land for the 21st century with data-driven simulations and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  41. Czerny, M. Globalizacja i Rozwój. Wybrane Zagadnienia Geografii Gospodarczej Świata; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  42. Parysek, M.; Parysek, J.J.; Mierzejewska, L.; Jażdżewska, I. Między Dezurabnizacją a Reurbanizacją: Nowe Oblicze Urbanizacji w Pol-sce, [w:] Współczesne Procesy Urbanizacji i Ich Skutki; Wyd. UŁ: Łódź, Poland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  43. Degórska, B. Spatial Urbanization of Rural Areas in the Warsaw Metropolitan Area. Ecological and Landscape Context; Instytut Geografii I Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania im. Stanisława Leszczyckiego, Polska Akademia Nauk: Warsaw, Poland, 2017. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  44. Mils, E. Studiesin fhe Structureofthe Urban Economy; Johns Hopkins Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  45. O’sullivan, A. Urban Economics; McGraw-Hill/Irwin: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 225–226. [Google Scholar]
  46. Geshkov, M. Urban sprawl in Eastern Europe: The Sofia City example. Econ. Altern. 2015, 2, 101–116. [Google Scholar]
  47. Biłozor, A. Urban land use changes forecasting. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Environmental Engineering. Section: Sustainable Urban Development, Vilnius, Lithuania, 22–23 May 2014; ISBN 978-609-457-640-9. [Google Scholar]
  48. Biłozor, A.; Czyża, S.; Bajerowski, T. Identification and Location of a Transitional Zone between an Urban and a Rural Area Using Fuzzy Set Theory, CLC, and HRL Data. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Simon, D. Urban Environments: Issues on the Peri-Urban Fringe. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2008, 33, 167–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Siemiński, J. Rural-urban continuum and some of its infrastructural problems. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural. Areas 2010, 2, 215–228. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sobotka, S. Transformation of the historical spatial arrangements of the villages in the suburban area of Olsztyn, with particular emphasis on Brąswałd, Dorotowo and Jonkowo. Acta Sci. Pol. Adm. Locorum 2014, 13, 39–68. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  52. Szmytkie, R. Methods of Analysis of the Morphology and Physiomic of Sedate Units; Scientific Hearings of the Institute of Geography and Regional Development of the University of Wrocław no. 35; Institute of Geography and Regional Development of the University of Wrocław: Wrocław, Poland, 2014; Available online: http://www.geogr.uni.wroc.pl/data/files/publikacje-rozprawy-naukowe-igrr/rozprawy_35.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2021). (In Polish)
  53. Konecka-Szydłowska, B. The smallest cities in Poland in terms of the concept of urban-rural continuums. Reg. Dev. Reg. Policy 2018, 41, 151–165. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  54. Degórska, B. Spatial urbanization of rural areas in the metropolitan area of Warsaw. Ecological and landscape context. In Institute of Geography and Spatial Development im. Stanisława Leszczyckiego, Polish Academy of Sciences, Geographic Work, no 262; Institute of Geography and Spatial Development: Warsaw, Poland, 2017. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  55. Ravetz, J.; Warhurst, P. Manchester: Re-inventing the local–global in the peri-urban city-region. In Peri-Urban Futures: Scenarios and Models for Land Use Change in Europe; Nilsson, K., Pauleit, S., Bell, S., Aalbers, C., Sick Nielsen, T., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Loibl, W.; Piorr, A.; Ravetz, J. Concepts and methods. In Peri-Urbanisation in Europe: Towards a European Policy to Sustain Urban-Rural Futures; Piorr, A., Ravetz, J., Tosics, I., Eds.; University of Copenhagen, Academic Books Life Sciences: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011; pp. 24–29. [Google Scholar]
  57. Labbé, D. Facing the Urban Transition in Hanoi: Recent Urban Planning Issues and Initiatives; Institut National de la Reherche scientifique Centre-Urbanisation Culture Société: Québec City, QC, Canada, 2010; Available online: http://espace.inrs.ca/id/eprint/4986/1/HanoiUrbanization.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2021).
  58. Acevedo, W.; Masuoka, P. Time-series animation techniques for visualizing urban growth. Comput. Geosci. 1997, 23, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Csatári, B.; Farkas, J.Z.; Lennert, J. Land Use Changes in the Rural-Urban Fringe of Kecskemét after the Economic Transition. J. Settl. Spat. Plan. 2013, 4, 153–159. [Google Scholar]
  60. Nabielek, K.; Kronberger-Nabielek, P.; Hamers, D. The rural-urban fringe in the Netherlands: Recent developments and future challenges. SPOOL 2013, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Simon, D.; McGregor, D.; Nsiah-Gyabaah, K. The changing urban–rural interface of African cities: Definitional issues and an application to Kumasi, Ghana. Environ. Urban. 2004, 16, 235–248. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tacoli, C. The links between rural and urban development. Environ. Urban. 2003, 15, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Hoffmann, E.; Jose, M.; Nölke, N.; Möckel, T. Construction and Use of a Simple Index of Urbanisation in the Rural–Urban Interface of Bangalore, India. Sustainability 2017, 9, 2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Gallent, N. The Rural–Urban fringe: A new priority for planning policy? Plan. Pract. Res. 2006, 21, 383–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Hao, P.; Geertman, S.; Hooimeijer, P.; Sliuzas, R. The land-use diversity in urban villages in Shenzhen. Environ. Plan. 2012, 44, 2742–2764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Gallent, N.; Shaw, D. Spatial planning, area action plans and the rural-urban fringe. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2001, 50, 617–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Gant, R.; Robinson, G.; Shahab, F. Land-use change in the ‘edgelands’: Policies and pressures in London’s rural–urban fringe. Land Use Policy 2011, 28, 266–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Datta, R. Territorial Integration: An approach to address urbanising villages in the planning for Delhi metropolitan area, India. In Proceedings of the Territorial Integration of Urbanising Villages 40th ISoCaRP Congress, Geneva, Switzerland, 22 September 2004. [Google Scholar]
  69. Biłozor, A.; Renigier-Biłozor, M.; Cellmer, R. Assessment Procedure of Suburban Land Attractiveness and Usability for Housing. In Proceedings of the Baltic Geodetic Congress, Olsztyn, Poland, 21–23 June 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Renigier-Bilozor, M.; Bilozor, A. Optimization of the Variables Selection in the Process of Real Estate Markets Rating. Oeconomia Copernic. 2015, 6, 139–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Renigier-Biłozor, M.; Biłozor, A.; Wiśniewski, R. 2017. Real estate markets rating engineering as the condition of urban areas assessment. Land Use Policy 2017, 61, 511–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Ready, R.; Abdalla, C. GIS Analysis of Land Use on the Rural-Urban Fringe: The Impact of Land Use and Potential Local Disamenities on Residential Property Values and on the Location of Residential Development in Berks County, Pennsylvania; Final Report; Staff Paper 364; Pennsylvania State University: State College, PA, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  73. Renigier-Bilozor, M.; Wisniewski, R.; Bilozor, A. Rating attributes toolkit for the residential property market. Int. J. Strateg. Property Manag. 2017, 21, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Renigier-Bilozor, M. Modern classification system of real estate markets. Geodetski Vestnik 2017, 61, 441–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Renigier-Biłozor, M.; Walacik, M.; Źróbek, S.; d’Amato, M. Forced sale discount on property market—How to assess it? Land Use Policy 2018, 78, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Konieczna, J.; Trystuła, A. Źródłą danych geoprzestrzennych na potrzeby waloryzacji. In Współczesna Waloryzacja Przestrzeni Zurbanizowanej; Iwona, C., Ed.; Wydawnictwo UWM w Olsztynie: Olsztyn, Poland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  77. Lefebvre, A.; Sannier, C.; Corpetti, T. Monitoring Urban Areas with Sentinel-2A Data: Application to the Update of the Copernicus High Resolution Layer Imperviousness Degree. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Zhang, M.; Chen, F.; Tian, B.; Liang, D. Multi-temporal SAR image classification of coastal plain wetlands using a new feature selection method and random forests. Remote Sens. Lett. 2019, 10, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Renigier-Biłozor, M.; Biłozor, A. The use of geoinformation in the process of optimization the use of land. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on “Environmental Engineering”, Vilnius, Lithuania, 22–23 May 2014. Section: Sustainable Urban Development Vilnius, Lithuania, eISSN 2029-7092/eISBN 978-609-457-640-9. [Google Scholar]
  80. Lisini, G.; Salentinig, A.; Du, P.; Gamba, P. SAR-Based Urban Extents Extraction: From ENVISAT to Sentinel-1. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2018, 11, 2683–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Bielecka, E.; Ciołkosz, A. CLC-2006-Database of Land Cover in Poland; PPK t. 41; 2009; Volume 3, pp. 227–236. [Google Scholar]
  82. Kantak, T. Spatial Information Systems (Auditory). Self-Study Support Materials for 3rd Year Part-Time Students of Navigation Major 2013/2014. Available online: https://gisplay.pl/gis/definicje-gis.html (accessed on 16 July 2021).
  83. Heymann, Y.; Steenmans, C.; Croisille, G.; Bossard, M. Corine Land Cover; Technical Guide 1994; Office for Official Publications of European Communities: Luxembourg, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  84. Cieślak, I.; Biłozor, A.; Szuniewicz, K. The Use of the CORINE Land Cover (CLC) Database for Analyzing Urban Sprawl. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Kuc, G.; Chormański, J. Sentinel-2 imagery for mapping and monitoring imperviousness in urban areas. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, 42, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  86. Furberg, D.; Ban, Y.; Nascetti, A. Monitoring of Urbanization and Analysis of Environmental Impact in Stockholm with Sentinel-2A and SPOT-5 Multispectral Data. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Liu, X.; Hu, G.; Chen, Y.; Li, X.; Xu, X.; Shaoying, L.; Pei, F.; Wang, S. 2018. High-resolution multi-temporal mapping of global urban land using Landsat images based on the Google Earth Engine Platform. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 209, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Pazúr, R.; Feranec, J.; Štych, P.; Kopecká, M.; Holman, L. 2017. Changes of urbanised landscape identified and assessed by the UrbanAtlas data: Case study of Prague and Bratislava. Land Use Policy 2017, 61, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Schug, F.; Okujeni, A.; Hauer, J.; Hostert, P.; Nielsen, J.; van der Linden, S. Mapping patterns of urban development in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, using machine learning regression modeling with bi-seasonal Landsat time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2018, 210, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Hsu, F.; Zhizhin, M.; Ghosh, T.; Elvidge, C.; Taneja, J. The Annual Cycling of Nighttime Lights in India. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  91. Liua, Z.; Hea, C.; Zhangc, O.; Huangd, O.; Yang Yanga, Y. 2012. Extracting the dynamics of urban expansion in China using DMSP-OLS nighttime light data from 1992 to 2008. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 106, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Jones, C.; Kammen, D.M. 2014. Spatial Distribution of U.S. Household Carbon Footprints Reveals Suburbanization Undermines Greenhouse Gas Benefits of Urban Population Density. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 895–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Hahs, A.K.; Mcdonnell, M.J.; Mccarthy, M.A.; Vesk, P.A.; Corlett, R.T.; Norton, B.A.; Clemants, S.E.; Duncan, R.P.; Thompson, K.; Schwartz, M.W. A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 12, 1165–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Ives, C.D.; Lentini, P.E.; Threlfall, C.G.; Ikin, K.; Shanahan, D.F.; Garrard, G.E.; Bekessy, S.A.; Fuller, R.A.; Mumaw, L.; Rayner, L.; et al. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2016, 25, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Luo, M.; Lau, N.C. Urban Expansion and Drying Climate in an Urban Agglomeration of East China. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2019, 46, 6868–6877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  96. Fan, H.; Yu, Z.; Yang, G.; Liu, T.Y.; Liu, T.Y.; Hung, C.H.; Vejre, H. How to cool hot-humid (Asian) cities with urban trees? An optimal landscape size perspective. Agr. For. Meteorol. 2019, 265, 338–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Jenerette, G.D.; Harlan, S.L.; Brazel, A.; Jones, N.; Larsen, L.; Stefanov, W.L. Regional relationships between surface temperature, vegetation, and human settlement in a rapidly urbanizing ecosystem. Landsc. Ecol. 2007, 22, 353–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Tu, M.; Liu, Z.; He, C.; Fang, Z.; Lu, W. The relationships between urban landscape patterns and fine particulate pollution in China: A multiscale investigation using a geographically weighted regression model. J. Clean Prod. 2019, 237, 117744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Cao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Fang, X. 2019. Vegetation Response to Urban Landscape Spatial Pattern Change in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Sustainability 2020, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Thiel, M.; Esch, T.; Schenk, A. Object-oriented detection of urban areas from terrasar-x data. 2008. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2008, XXXVII Pt B8, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  101. Batty, M. New ways of looking at cities. Nature 1995, 377, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Antrop, M. Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landsc. Ecol. 2000, 15, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  103. Zhu, Y. Changing urbanization processes and in situ rural-urban transformation: Reflections on China’s settlement definitions. In New forms of Urbanization; Routledge: London, UK, 2017; pp. 207–228. [Google Scholar]
  104. Das, M.; Das, A. Dynamics of Urbanization and its impact on Urban Ecosystem Services (UESs): A study of a medium size town of West Bengal, Eastern India. J. Urban Manag. 2019, 8, 420–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  105. Wang, J.; Lin, Y.; Glendinning, A.; Xu, Y. Land-use changes and land policies evolution in China’s urbanization processes. Land Use Policy 2018, 75, 375–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  106. Petrişor, A.I.; Ianoş, I.; Tălângă, C. Land cover and use changes focused on the urbanization pro-cesses in Romania. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2010, 9, 765–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  107. Morano, P.; Guarini, M.R.; Tajani, F.; Anelli, D. Sustainable redevelopment: The cost-revenue analysis to support the urban planning decisions. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 968–980. [Google Scholar]
  108. BenDor, T.K.; Metcalf, S.S.; Paich, M. The dynamics of brownfield redevelopment. Sustainability 2011, 3, 914–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. BenDor, T.; Metcalf, S. Conceptual Modeling and Dynamic Simulation of Brownfield Redevelopment. In Proceedings of the 23rd International System Dynamics Conference, Boston, MA, USA, 17–21 July 2005. [Google Scholar]
  110. Attardi, R.; Cerreta, M.; Sannicandro, V.; Torre, C.M. Non-compensatory composite indicators for the evaluation of urban planning policy: The land-use policy efficiency index (LUPEI). Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 264, 491–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Cerreta, M.; Panaro, S.; Poli, G. A spatial decision support system for multifunctional landscape assessment: A transformative resilience perspective for vulnerable inland areas. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Burkhard, B.; Kroll, F.; Müller, F.; Windhorst, W. Landscapes’ capacities to provide ecosystem services—A concept for land-cover based assessments. Landsc. Online 2009, 15, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Sutton, P.C.; Costanza, R. Global estimates of market and non-market values derived from nighttime satellite imagery, land cover, and ecosystem service valuation. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41, 509–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  114. Mierzejewska, L. Sustainable urban development—Selected understandings, concepts and models. Problems of Urban Development. Probl. Rozw. Miast. 2015, 3, 5–11. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.