Next Article in Journal
Channel Planform Dynamics Monitoring and Channel Stability Assessment in Two Sediment-Rich Rivers in Taiwan
Next Article in Special Issue
Variability in the Water Footprint of Arable Crop Production across European Regions
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Optional Sediment Transport Functions via the Complex Watershed Simulation Model SWAT
Previous Article in Special Issue
Water Footprints and ‘Pozas’: Conversations about Practices and Knowledges of Water Efficiency

Water Savings of Crop Redistribution in the United States

Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
The Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025, USA
The Nature Conservancy, New York, NY 10001, USA
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan I-20133, Italy
Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2017, 9(2), 83;
Received: 25 October 2016 / Accepted: 22 December 2016 / Published: 30 January 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Footprint Assessment)
Demographic growth, changes in diet, and reliance on first-generation biofuels are increasing the human demand for agricultural products, thereby enhancing the human pressure on global freshwater resources. Recent research on the food-water nexus has highlighted how some major agricultural regions of the world lack the water resources required to sustain current growth trends in crop production. To meet the increasing need for agricultural commodities with limited water resources, the water use efficiency of the agricultural sector must be improved. In this regard, recent work indicates that the often overlooked strategy of changing the crop distribution within presently cultivated areas offers promise. Here we investigate the extent to which water in the United States could be saved while improving yields simply by replacing the existing crops with more suitable ones. We propose crop replacement criteria that achieve this goal while preserving crop diversity, economic value, nitrogen fixation, and food protein production. We find that in the United States, these criteria would greatly improve calorie (+46%) and protein (+34%) production and economic value (+208%), with 5% water savings with respect to the present crop distribution. Interestingly, greater water savings could be achieved in water-stressed agricultural regions of the US such as California (56% water savings), and other western states. View Full-Text
Keywords: water footprint; water resources; agriculture; irrigation; nutrition; sustainability water footprint; water resources; agriculture; irrigation; nutrition; sustainability
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Davis, K.F.; Seveso, A.; Rulli, M.C.; D’Odorico, P. Water Savings of Crop Redistribution in the United States. Water 2017, 9, 83.

AMA Style

Davis KF, Seveso A, Rulli MC, D’Odorico P. Water Savings of Crop Redistribution in the United States. Water. 2017; 9(2):83.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Davis, Kyle F., Antonio Seveso, Maria C. Rulli, and Paolo D’Odorico. 2017. "Water Savings of Crop Redistribution in the United States" Water 9, no. 2: 83.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop