1. Introduction
A mixed-flow pump is a type of fluid machinery that combines the structural features and performance advantages of centrifugal pumps and axial-flow pumps. It transports fluid through the combined action of centrifugal force and axial thrust generated by the rotation of the impeller. Owing to its merits of large flow rate, a wide high-efficiency operating range, a simple structure, compact size, and excellent cavitation resistance, mixed-flow pumps are widely applied in clean energy, advanced power, national defense security, the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, and other fields [
1,
2,
3,
4]. With the development of modern industry toward large-scale, high-speed, and high-efficiency trends, the application scope of fluid machinery has become wider and its working environment increasingly complex [
5,
6,
7]. The operating conditions of mixed-flow pumps have become increasingly complicated. Especially under part-load or off-design conditions, the complex internal flow structure within the impeller and its strong interaction with the guide vanes easily induce flow instabilities, among which rotational stall is the most typical and harmful one [
8]. Rotational stall refers to the phenomenon that occurs when the flow rate of hydraulic machinery drops to a certain threshold where the inlet incidence angle of the flow in the impeller increases, resulting in flow separation on the suction surface of the blades. Disturbance and entrainment are formed by the mixing of the separated flow with the main flow, and then one or more low-speed vortices, namely stall cells, are generated. These stall cells rotate circumferentially in the direction opposite to the impeller rotation. Rotational stall not only causes a significant drop in the head and efficiency of the pump, accompanied by intense pressure pulsation and structural vibration, but also may lead to fatigue failure of the blades, which seriously threatens the safe and stable operation of the unit. It has become a key bottleneck restricting the development of mixed-flow pumps toward high performance and wide operating ranges [
9].
Tip clearance is an inevitable small gap between the impeller and the stationary pump casing of a mixed-flow pump. Due to the relative motion between the blade tip and the end wall, as well as the pressure difference between the pressure surface and the suction surface, tip leakage flow is generated in the tip clearance region. The mixing of the leakage flow with the main flow near the suction surface forms tip leakage vortices, which are closely related to the occurrence and development of rotational stall [
10,
11]. As the dominant flow structure in the tip clearance region, the formation, development, and breakup of tip leakage vortices directly disturb the stability of the main flow field inside the impeller, intensify flow separation, induce or promote the occurrence of rotational stall, and thus impair the operational stability of the pump [
12]. Meanwhile, the non-uniform flow field caused by rotational stall in turn affects the morphology, structure and trajectory of the leakage vortices, forming a complex flow mechanism of mutual coupling and interaction [
13]. Factors such as the size and uniform distribution of the tip clearance, as well as the eccentricity of the impeller, can significantly change the intensity and evolution characteristics of the leakage vortices. These factors further affect the critical stall condition, the number of stall cells and the propagation speed of rotational stall and play an important role in regulating the energy performance and operational stability of mixed-flow pumps [
14,
15].
Due to the complexity of tip leakage flow, it is difficult for experimental methods to capture the structural morphology and development process of tip leakage vortices. Moreover, numerical calculation techniques have shown significant effectiveness in addressing issues in the pump industry [
16,
17]. Among these methods, numerical simulation methods based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD), have become the core means to study the complex internal flow characteristics of mixed-flow pumps owing to their advantages of high efficiency, economy and strong repeatability, providing strong technical support for revealing the coupling mechanism between rotational stall and leakage vortices [
18]. In recent years, with the continuous improvement of turbulence models, the precision of mesh generation technology and the enhancement of high-performance computing capabilities, numerical simulation can more accurately capture the fine structures of tip clearance leakage vortices, the evolution of rotational stall, and the dynamic coupling relationship between them. This effectively makes up for the shortcomings of experimental research, such as high measurement difficulty, high cost and difficulty in capturing transient flow details [
19]. Through numerical calculation, researchers can systematically analyze the interaction laws between leakage vortices and rotational stall under different tip clearance parameters and operating conditions and quantify flow losses. This provides a reliable theoretical basis and technical guidance for the structural optimization, stall suppression, and stable operation design of mixed-flow pumps under broad working conditions [
20].
In recent years, scholars have carried out extensive research on the core issues of rotational stall and leakage vortices in mixed-flow pumps and have achieved fruitful results in turbulence model optimization, leakage vortex evolution mechanisms, and inducing factors and suppression methods of rotational stall [
21,
22]. Li et al. [
23] investigated the structure of tip leakage flow under near-stall conditions based on the SST k-ω turbulence model and explored the energy loss mechanism induced by leakage flow and its influence on the downstream flow field. Liu et al. [
24] blended the turbulent stress terms of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) and large-eddy simulation (LES) at the zonal interface and developed a RANS-LES hybrid model suitable for tip clearance leakage vortices. It was revealed that obvious flow separation exists inside the tip clearance and strong coherent shear flow appears near the suction side of the blade tip. Liu et al. [
25] measured the flow field at the upstream and downstream sections of an NACA0024 airfoil using particle image velocimetry (PIV) and analyzed the relationship between leakage vortices and leakage vortex cavitation. Han et al. [
26] numerically simulated the tip leakage flow in a mixed-flow pump using the rotation–curvature-corrected SST k-ω turbulence model. A unique passage vortex–leakage vortex pair at the blade leading edge was discovered, and the evolution mechanism of double-peak leakage vortex cavitation was revealed. Ye et al. [
27] studied the three-dimensional flow characteristics of tip clearance leakage vortices over an NACA662-415 hydrofoil under cavitating and non-cavitating conditions using tomographic PIV. Ji et al. [
28] measured the flow structure at the guide vane inlet of a mixed-flow pump with different tip clearances via PIV. The results showed that the larger the tip clearance, the larger the flow blockage area induced by leakage vortices. Han et al. [
29] measured the tip clearance leakage flow in a mixed-flow pump with a high-speed camera, observed and named the double-peak tip leakage vortex structure for the first time, and revealed its spatiotemporal evolution law and dynamic mechanism. Han et al. [
30] proposed a refined measurement method based on PIV, which realized the accurate experimental measurement of tip leakage flow in mixed-flow pumps. The leakage vortices are generated by the shear interaction between leakage flow and main flow, and their area and vorticity first increase and then decrease from the blade leading edge to the trailing edge. Liu et al. [
31] established a mathematical equation that relates the impeller geometric parameters and operating parameters to the three-dimensional dimensionless distribution of tip leakage vortices, and proposed a theoretical model for predicting the 3D morphology of tip leakage vortices in mixed-flow pumps. Cheng et al. [
32] numerically investigated the hydraulic performance and internal flow characteristics of a volute mixed-flow pump under different tip clearances. Based on the analysis of flow field, vortex structure and pressure distribution, the influence of tip clearance variation on the head, efficiency and operation stability of the pump was revealed. Zhang et al. [
33] carried out numerical simulations using the delayed detached-eddy simulation (DDES) method to alleviate the adverse effects of tip leakage flow and vortices on the internal flow field. Bi et al. [
34] studied the transient flow characteristics of leakage flow and clarified the mechanism of upstream wake on the tip leakage vortex system and mixing loss.
At present, the coupling mechanism between tip clearance leakage vortices and rotational stall has not been fully clarified. In particular, the dynamic interaction mechanism between the two under off-design conditions still needs to be further explored [
35]. Moreover, there is a lack of systematic research on the influence of different tip clearance distributions (uniform and non-uniform) on leakage vortices and rotational stall [
36]. The accuracy of existing numerical methods in capturing transient flow details such as leakage vortex breakdown and stall cell evolution still needs to be improved, and numerical simulations under multi-physics field coupling are relatively scarce [
37,
38]. In this paper, a guide vane mixed-flow pump is taken as the research object. Numerical simulation combined with experimental methods is adopted to study the influence of different tip clearances on the rotational stall characteristics of mixed-flow pumps. The relationship between leakage vortices and rotational stall in mixed-flow pumps with different tip clearances is revealed, which can provide a reference for further research.
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Comparison of External Characteristics
4.1.1. Comparison Between Numerical Simulation and Test Results
Figure 6 shows the comparison diagram of the mixed-flow pump test and external characteristics under the clearance of 0.5 mm, where Q is the actual flow rate and Q
des is the rated flow rate. For the convenience of analysis, let Φ = Q/Q
des. It can be seen from
Figure 6 that in the Φ-H curve, the simulated value of the head is generally slightly higher than the test value. This is because the numerical simulation cannot accurately simulate various energy dissipations under real test conditions. However, under most flow rate conditions, the absolute difference between the two is less than 5% of the test value. The head values obtained by numerical simulation and test measurement are basically consistent, and a relatively large error only occurs near 0.2Q
des. This is because when the flow rate is close to the shut-off point, the actual flow pattern is very complex, with more turbulent dissipation and impact loss at this time, which cannot be fully covered in the numerical simulation. Therefore, it is acceptable that there is a relatively large gap between the simulated value and the test value under the ultra-small flow rate condition. In addition, under the design flow condition, the simulated head is 5.41 m, and the tested head is 5.44 m. The relative error between the simulated head and the tested head is 0.55%, which is within 1%, indicating high prediction accuracy.
In the Φ-η curve, the simulated value of efficiency is almost perfectly consistent with the test value; except for individual operating points, the absolute difference between the two is lower than 3% of the test value. When the actual flow rate exceeds the design flow rate due to the increase in flow velocity and pressure, the disk friction and impact loss on the inner wall of the test pump will increase, so it is reasonable that the simulated value is slightly higher than the test value in the large flow rate condition. Overall, the head and efficiency obtained by numerical simulation are in good agreement with the test results, indicating that the simulation results have certain reliability.
4.1.2. Comparison of External Characteristics of Mixed-Flow Pumps with Different Impeller Clearances
When the flow rate is between 0.4Qdes and 0.8Qdes, the head changes slowly with the flow rate. By simulating more operating points, it is found that the head curve has a positive slope characteristic, which indicates that rotational stall may occur when the mixed-flow pump operates in this flow rate range. Relevant studies have shown that mixed-flow pumps are prone to rotational stall under small flow rate conditions, and the corresponding external characteristics will show unstable characteristics, which are mainly marked by the appearance of positive slope head curves. The degree of sudden drop in head is related to the intensity of rotational stall, and the larger the intensity of rotational stall, the more obvious the sudden drop in head.
As shown in
Figure 7, to study the influence of different tip clearances on the rotational stall characteristics of the mixed-flow pump, the external characteristic curves were measured when the tip clearances δ were 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 mm respectively. It can be seen from the figure that the trends of the external characteristic curves for the three tip clearances are basically consistent, and with the increase in the clearance, the head of the mixed-flow pump decreases in the entire flow rate range. This is because the increase in the clearance leads to increasing tip losses caused by tip leakage. The external performance differences in the mixed-flow pump under different tip clearances can be analyzed in combination with the flow separation mechanism and energy loss terms as follows: As the tip clearance increases, the leakage flow at the impeller tip is significantly enhanced. A large amount of high-pressure fluid leaks directly from the pressure side to the suction side of the blade, which disrupts the development of the boundary layer on the blade surface and aggravates the flow separation and backflow region on the blade suction side. The larger the clearance is, the more obvious the flow separation becomes and the more disturbed the main flow is, leading to a significant increase in vortex loss, turbulent dissipation loss and wall friction loss inside the pump. At the same time, the tip leakage flow interacts with the main flow through extrusion and shearing, forming large-scale local vortex structures, which further increases the local energy dissipation and the rotor–stator interaction loss. As a result, the work efficiency of the impeller decreases, and the head and efficiency curves decline overall.
In addition, the heads of the three clearances all start to decrease from 0.6Qdes, which is the critical stall point, and reach the minimum at 0.56Qdes, which is the deep-stall point. The flow rate range where the positive slope curve appears is basically consistent. When δ = 0.8 mm, the head drop is the largest, and the positive slope unstable characteristic is the most obvious, indicating that the rotational stall phenomenon occurring at this time may be the most serious. The saddle-shaped curve is only the external manifestation of the rotational stall of the mixed-flow pump; to accurately judge the severity of rotational stall, further analysis from the internal flow field is required. In addition, under small flow rate conditions, the influence of tip clearance on pump efficiency is very small while under large flow rate conditions, with the increase in tip clearance, the pump efficiency gradually decreases.
4.2. Analysis of the Internal Flow Field in a Mixed-Flow Pump Under Stall Conditions
4.2.1. Flow Patterns of Mixed-Flow Pump Under Stall Conditions with Different Tip Clearances
For the mixed-flow pumps with three different tip clearances (δ = 0.2 mm, 0.5 mm, and 0.8 mm), their flow characteristics under stall conditions were studied respectively at the critical stall condition 0.6Q
des and deep-stall condition 0.56Q
des.
Figure 8 presents the 3D velocity streamline distribution starting from the leading edge of the impeller. It can be seen from the figure that under the critical stall condition 0.6Q
des, obvious secondary flow occurs at the leading edge tip of the blade. A part of the flow separation generated at the blade tip flows into the current flow channel, while the other part flows into the next-stage flow channel or towards the inlet by passing over the tip of the next blade. Moreover, with the increase in the impeller tip clearance, the intensity of the secondary flow at the blade tip becomes stronger, and the influence range of the flow that passes over the next blade tip and flows into the next-stage flow channel becomes wider.
Under the deep-stall condition 0.56Qdes, an obvious “tornado”-shaped vortex structure, namely the stall vortex, appears near the suction surface at the outlet of the flow channel. The stall vortex at the outlet of the flow channel rotates and rises towards the inlet blade tip, which causes serious disturbance to the incoming flow at the inlet of the next-stage flow channel. By comparing the streamlines of the three different tip clearances, it can be found that when the tip clearance δ = 0.2 mm, the stall vortex at the outlet of the flow channel has a certain impact on the inlet of the next-stage flow channel. However, when the tip clearance increases to 0.5 mm or even 0.8 mm, the disturbance of the stall vortex on the inlet of the next-stage flow channel becomes more intense. Furthermore, new stall vortices are formed at the inlet of the next-stage flow channel, which in turn affects the subsequent flow channels. Therefore, it can be concluded that with the increase in the tip clearance, the flow pattern inside the impeller becomes more complex, the internal flow loss increases, and the energy loss of the pump becomes more serious.
4.2.2. Morphology Analysis of Leakage Flow in a Mixed-Flow Pump Under Stall Conditions
Regarding the tip leakage flow, the shape and trajectory of the leakage flow in the mixed-flow pump under different tip clearances were analyzed.
Figure 9 shows the streamline distribution of the leakage flow under three different tip clearances at the 1.0Q
des operating condition. It can be seen from the figure that the leakage flow at the blade tip inlet has a certain separation angle with the blade. The part with a smaller separation angle flows into the flow channel along the direction of the main flow, while the part with a larger separation angle flows back to the blade tip inlet of the next-stage blade. Due to the interaction between these two parts of the leakage flow, the leakage flow flows out in a spiral shape at the flow channel outlet.
Under the three different tip clearances, the flow channel area occupied by the leakage flow shows a trend of first increasing and then decreasing from the impeller inlet to the impeller outlet. Moreover, at the impeller outlet, the leakage flow flows along the pressure surface of the adjacent blade with a relatively long flow trajectory. With the increase in the tip clearance, the flow channel area occupied by the leakage flow becomes larger and larger, and the development distance of the leakage flow from the outlet of the current blade to the next-stage blade becomes farther and farther. Therefore, with the increase in the tip clearance, the leakage flow rate increases, and its impact on the impeller flow channel becomes more and more significant.
The streamline distribution of the leakage flow under three different tip clearances at the 0.6Q
des operating condition was obtained, as shown in
Figure 10. It can be seen from the figure that under the near-stall condition, the shape and trajectory of the leakage flow have changed significantly. Compared with the 1.0Q
des operating condition, the tip leakage flow velocity is lower, and the flow trajectory of the leakage flow at the impeller outlet becomes shorter. The leakage flow at the blade tip inlet develops into a large low-velocity vortex at the position of the suction surface stall vortex, and the leakage flow at the blade tip outlet is deflected toward the inlet direction under its influence, flowing into the next-stage flow channel.
At the outlet of adjacent blades, when δ > 0.2 mm, obvious vortices are formed at the impeller outlet, thereby causing a blockage of the flow channel. Moreover, the larger the clearance, the larger the vortices, and the stronger the blocking effect on the flow channel. In addition, at this time, the leakage flow flows from the tip clearance near the inlet of the adjacent blade and the leading edge of the adjacent blade to the adjacent flow channel, which has a significant impact on the inlet flow field of the adjacent blade. Under the small clearance condition (δ = 0.2 mm), the overall leakage flow is relatively weak. Flow separation and stall blockage only occur in the local circumferential region of the impeller. Accordingly, the leakage flow is concentrated and originates from approximately one quarter of the impeller circumference. As the clearance increases, the intensity of leakage flow is significantly enhanced. Meanwhile, unstable stall disturbances propagate along the entire circumferential passages of the impeller. At this time, the leakage flow is fully developed and uniformly distributed over the entire impeller annulus.
4.3. Vortex Distribution Characteristics of Mixed-Flow Pumps with Different Tip Clearances Under Stall Conditions
To verify the influence of different impeller clearances on the stall vortex and leakage vortex of the mixed-flow pump under stall conditions, the three-dimensional vorticity field distributions inside the impellers of the mixed-flow pumps with three different clearances were compared, as shown in
Figure 11. In this paper, the Q-criterion is adopted to identify vortex structures in the flow field, combined with turbulent kinetic energy to mark the vortex intensity. Considering the velocity gradient characteristics inside the mixed-flow pump, the elimination of wall shear pseudo-vortices, the benchmarking of previous numerical cases of the same pump model, and mesh numerical accuracy, the threshold is determined as Q = 45,000 s
−2. This threshold effectively filters out spurious vortices in the blade boundary layer, completely captures typical coherent vortices including passage vortices, tip leakage vortices and trailing edge shedding vortices, and matches well with the turbulent kinetic energy field solved by the SST k-ω model, ensuring consistent comparative analysis of vortex structures under different operating conditions.
By comparing the vorticity distribution diagrams of the guide vane part under the stall conditions of 0.56Qdes and 0.6Qdes, it can be found that under the stall state, the vorticity change under different tip clearances is more obvious. Therefore, it can be concluded that the intensity of the leakage vortex under the stall state is more affected by the tip clearance. Observing the vorticity distribution diagrams under different flow rate conditions with the three different tip clearances, it can be seen that under the critical stall state (0.6Qdes), the intensity of the leakage vortex is significantly enhanced compared with the rated condition (1.0Qdes), and when the deep-stall condition (0.56Qdes) is reached, the intensity of the leakage vortex will continue to increase.
In summary, with the gradual increase in the deviation of the mixed-flow pump from the design flow rate condition, the degree of rotational stall deepens, the structure of the leakage vortex at the impeller outlet undergoes significant changes, and the intensity of the stall vortex and leakage vortex between the impeller and the guide vane continues to increase. With the increase in the tip clearance (rim clearance), the change in the stall vortex is small, while the intensity of the leakage vortex increases, and the blocking effect on the flow channel becomes stronger.
4.4. Flow Characteristics of Mixed-Flow Pump Under Different Flow Rate Conditions
Since the tip leakage flow of the mixed-flow pump will interfere with the normal operation of the mixed-flow pump and have a significant impact on the internal flow of the impeller, at the same time, the flow instability caused by the leakage flow will also change the velocity and pressure distribution of the flow field. During the high-speed rotation of the impeller, a certain pressure difference will inevitably be formed between the pressure surface and the suction surface on both sides of the impeller blade. The influence of the leakage flow on the flow characteristics of the mixed-flow pump was further studied by analyzing the pressure change from the inlet to the outlet of the impeller blade.
Streamlines at different blade heights of the blade were selected for analysis, as shown in
Figure 12. The blade was divided into four streamlines according to different spanwise heights, Span = 0.1, Span = 0.3, Span = 0.6, and Span = 0.9, to analyze the pressure change at different blade height positions of the blade.
Figure 13 compares the pressure distribution on the Span = 0.6 section under different flow rate conditions. Observing the pressure distribution on the pressure surface section, it can be seen that the impeller works normally under the 1.0Q
des flow rate condition, with relatively uniform pressure distribution on both sides, generally showing a trend of increasing with the increase in the streamwise coefficient. The pressure decreases slightly when reaching the end of the streamwise direction, indicating that the flow patterns at both ends of the blade streamline are more complex.
Under the critical stall condition (0.6Qdes) and deep-stall condition (0.56Qdes), the pressure on the pressure surface shows a trend of first decreasing and then increasing with the increase in the streamwise coefficient in the range of 0 < Streamwise < 0.3. Moreover, the variation amplitude of the 0.56Qdes condition is larger than that of the 0.6Qdes condition, and the pressure is lower. However, in the range of 0.3 < Streamwise < 0.8, the pressure change on the pressure surface fluctuates within a small range compared with the rated condition, which is caused by the vorticity attached to the blade surface.
When Streamwise approaches 1.0, the pressure of the two stall conditions decreases gradually like that of the rated condition, and the pressure drop amplitude of the deep-stall condition is larger. At the blade spanwise range of 0 < Streamwise < 0.4, the pressure on the suction surface of the blade under the 1.0Qdes flow rate condition decreases to a certain extent with the increase in the streamwise coefficient, while it shows an increasing trend under the 0.6Qdes and 0.56Qdes flow rate conditions.
In the range of 0.4 < Streamwise < 0.8, the pressures on the blade suction surface under the three flow rate conditions are highly consistent. When Streamwise approaches 1.0, the pressures on the blade suction surface under the three flow rate conditions gradually increase, and with the deepening of the stall degree, the pressure on the blade suction surface becomes lower.
In summary, with the gradual increase in the deviation of the flow rate condition, the internal flow field of the impeller is more affected by the stall vortex and leakage vortex.
4.5. Flow Characteristics of Mixed-Flow Pumps with Different Tip Clearances
Since the leakage vortex will affect the next-stage blades, it is necessary to compare the pressure distribution on the blade surface under different clearance conditions to explore the influence of impeller clearance on the leakage vortex under stall conditions.
Figure 14 shows the pressure distribution on the pressure surface at different section positions of the blade surface under three different clearance conditions at the 0.6Q
des flow rate condition.
It can be seen from the pressure distribution curves on the pressure surface of the four sections (Span = 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9) under different tip clearances (0.2 mm, 0.5 mm, and 0.8 mm) that the size of the tip clearance has a significant impact on the pressure distribution of the mixed-flow pump impeller section and the leakage flow characteristics. Under each Span section, the 0.2 mm small clearance condition maintains the highest pressure level and the steepest pressure gradient. The pressure rises steadily along the flow direction, reaches the peak value in the near-outlet section, and gradually decreases when the streamline approaches 1.0. The leakage flow is strongly constrained, only forming a thin-layer jet, with minimum energy loss.
With the increase in the clearance to 0.5 mm, the overall pressure level decreases significantly, the pressure gradient becomes gentle, the peak pressure decreases, the intensity of the leakage flow increases, and the flow disturbance intensifies. When the clearance is further expanded to 0.8 mm, the pressure distribution is the flattest, the peak pressure drops to the lowest, the leakage flow develops into a large-scale backflow and vortex, and the energy loss is the most serious.
Figure 15 shows the pressure distribution on the suction surface at different section positions of the blade surface under three different clearance conditions. It can be found from the suction surface pressure distribution curves of the four sections (Span = 0.1, 0.3, 0.6, and 0.9) under different tip clearances (0.2 mm, 0.5 mm, and 0.8 mm) that the variation trends of the suction surface pressure under the three clearances are highly consistent, generally showing a trend of increasing pressure along the streamline direction, and the pressure on the suction surface gradually decreases with the increase in the clearance.
Near the leading edge of the impeller, there is a section of non-uniform increase in the pressure on the blade suction surface, and the pressure will increase at a constant speed after the pressure is fully developed along the streamline. At the Span = 0.1 position, it is fully developed within 0 < Streamwise < 0.05. However, as the section position is closer to the rim, the pressure development interval gradually increases. When Span = 0.9, the suction surface pressure shows an uneven increase within 0 < Streamwise < 0.4, which indicates that the closer the leakage flow is to the blade tip region, the greater the influence of the upstream tip leakage flow on the pressure on the impeller surface.