Next Article in Journal
Stability Analysis of High-Fill Slopes with EPS–Spoil Composite in Gullies Under Rainfall Conditions: From Scheme to Practice
Previous Article in Journal
Applications, Challenges, and Future Trends of Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT)-Enabled Water Quality and Resource Management
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Food Processing Industry Wastewater on Root Growth and DNA Damage in Allium cepa L. as Assessed by the Comet Assay
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in Hybrid Photo-Fenton Processes for Treating Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Water and Wastewater Systems

by
Enric Brillas
1,* and
Juan M. Peralta-Hernández
2,*
1
Department of Material Science and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Barcelona, Martí i Franquès 1-11, CP 08028 Barcelona, Spain
2
Laboratory of Environment and Electrochemistry (LMAE), Department of Chemistry-DCNE, University of Guanajuato, Cerro de la Venada s/n, Pueblito de Rocha 36040, Guanajuato, Mexico
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2026, 18(8), 920; https://doi.org/10.3390/w18080920
Submission received: 27 February 2026 / Revised: 18 March 2026 / Accepted: 20 March 2026 / Published: 13 April 2026

Abstract

Advanced oxidation processes based on photo-Fenton chemistry have gained increasing attention as effective treatment alternatives for the removal of pharmaceutical contaminants from water and wastewater systems. However, large-scale implementation remains constrained by operational requirements, limited mineralization efficiency, and challenges associated with process stability and selectivity. This review provides a critical assessment of recent advances (2022–2025) in conventional photo-Fenton and hybrid systems, including photocatalysis/photo-Fenton and sono-photo-Fenton processes, with emphasis on their performance in water and wastewater treatment applications. The removal of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antibiotics, pharmaceutical mixtures, and real wastewater matrices is analyzed considering catalyst configuration, irradiation sources, oxidant utilization, and operating conditions relevant to practical treatment scenarios. Conventional homogeneous Fe2+/H2O2 systems enable rapid contaminant degradation but typically require acidic conditions and show limited mineralization efficiency. In contrast, iron-complexed and heterogeneous catalysts allow operation under near-neutral pH and visible-light irradiation, improving applicability in realistic water treatment systems. Hybrid photocatalysis/photo-Fenton processes enhance treatment efficiency through synergistic generation of reactive oxygen species, while ultrasound-assisted systems further intensify oxidation rates and contaminant removal. Special attention is given to oxidation mechanisms, catalyst stability, transformation products, and toxicity evolution to identify the key factors controlling treatment performance. Finally, current technological limitations, operational challenges, and design considerations for process integration, scale-up, and sustainable implementation in water and wastewater treatment are discussed.

1. Introduction

Conventional biological and physicochemical treatments in wastewater treatment plants are largely ineffective for the removal of pharmaceutical contaminants due to their chemical stability, low biodegradability, and continuous input into water systems. As a result, these micropollutants persist in treated effluents and natural waters, highlighting the need for oxidation technologies capable of transforming recalcitrant organic molecules rather than simply transferring them between phases.
Advanced oxidation processes based on photo-Fenton chemistry have emerged as promising alternatives because they generate highly reactive species able to degrade complex pharmaceutical structures. However, practical application remains limited by operational constraints such as acidic working conditions, incomplete mineralization, and reduced efficiency in real wastewater matrices. To overcome these limitations, hybrid systems combining photo-Fenton with photocatalysis or ultrasound irradiation have been increasingly investigated to enhance oxidant utilization and reaction pathways. Despite the rapid growth of these studies, the relationship between oxidation mechanisms, catalyst configuration, and treatment performance has not been critically unified. Therefore, a systematic evaluation of recent developments is required to identify the governing factors controlling efficiency and applicability in water and wastewater treatment.
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), based on the in situ production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are preeminently hydroxyl radical (OH), are the most powerful treatments for pharmaceutical remediation. Among them, simple Fenton (a mixture of H2O2 and Fe2+) and related processes have experienced a large development in recent years due to their high oxidation effectiveness on drug destruction. Photo-Fenton (PF) is a variety of the Fenton process in which light irradiation is used to enhance its oxidation process. Despite the advantages of this method, only a recent review from 2023 [1] has described its application to hospital wastewater remediation, without any mention of the removal of drugs in water and other wastewater. Several specific reviews have reported the destruction of acetaminophen [2], tetracycline [3,4], and diclofenac [5] by different AOPs, including PF. However, there has not been any review that has considered the general behavior of all drugs under PF treatment and their degradation/mineralization performance. Taking this into mind, an exhaustive search of the Web of Science database was made with the keywords: “Pharmaceutical” and “Photo-Fenton”. The retrieved scientific papers were then analyzed from their title and abstracts, only considering those written in English and excluding books, book chapters, and proceedings from conferences. A total of 127 articles related to the recent period 2022–2025 were selected for the present review. In each year from 2022–2024, about 30 scientific articles were published, and a greater number of 47 articles were found in 2025, demonstrating the increasing recent interest in this technology. Based on their methodology, the scientific papers were grouped according to single PF (66 articles, 52.0%), hybrid photocatalysis (PC)/PF (54 articles, 42.5%), and sono-PF (SPF) (seven articles, 5.5%) processes. In each case, single NSDAIs, antibiotics, and other drugs, as well as a mixture of drugs and real wastewater, were distinguished.
This article presents a comprehensive and critical review dealing with the fundamentals of PF, PC/PF, and SPF and their applications to the removal of pharmaceuticals from different aqueous matrices. The degradation and/or mineralization performance of each process, the system used, the role of generated oxidants, the reuse of catalysts or photocatalysts, and the by-products produced are noted. The change in toxicity of treated drug solutions is analyzed. A final section details the challenges and future perspectives of these technologies.

2. Photo-Fenton Treatment of Pharmaceuticals in Water and Wastewater

This section describes the homogeneous PF, homogeneous PF-like, heterogeneous PF, and heterogeneous PF-like methods developed for drug removal in water and wastewater. Each method considers aqueous solutions with NAIDs, antibiotics, and other drugs, a mixture of drugs, and/or real wastewaters for their degradation/mineralization. Table 1 summarizes the main results obtained for these studies, noting the drug tested, the system used, and the experimental conditions checked.
Figure 1 shows the schemes of several PF photoreactors, including stirred-tanks with external UV light [33], with inner UV light [30], and with inner UV light and thermostatic bath [34]. A flow system with external UVC light is presented in Figure 1b [27] and a recirculation system with inner UV-Vis light in Figure 1e [19].

2.1. Homogeneous Photo-Fenton

The conventional homogeneous Fenton consists of the use of the so-called Fenton reagent, a mixture of H2O2 and Fe2+ catalyst, to produce the strong oxidant OH by homogeneous Fenton reaction (1) in an acid medium with optimum pH close to 3.0 [5]. Its low absolute second rate constant k2 of 55 M−1 s−1 indicates a slow reaction between both species for OH generation, which possesses a high standard reduction potential (E°(OH/H2O)) of 2.80 V vs. SHE. The attack of OH on drugs gives hydroxylated derivatives that evolve to final short, linear aliphatic carboxylic acids, originating from Fe(III)-carboxylate complexes, which are highly resistant to oxidation by (OH) [2]. The homogeneous Fenton-like reaction (2) allows the Fe2+ regeneration with formation of hydroperoxyl radical (HO2) that possesses such a low E°(HO2/H2O) = 1.65 V vs. SHE that it is unable to function for drug oxidation. HO2 can also regenerate Fe2+ by reaction (3) or is deprotonated to the superoxide radical anion (O2●−) by reaction (4). The very small k2 value of 2 × 10−3 M−1 s−1 for reaction (2) in comparison to that of reaction (1) means that the Fenton reagent acts up to the consumption of one component. So, stoichiometric amounts of both components, related to the theoretical overall mineralization of drug pollutants, are added for Fenton treatment:
Fe2+ + H2O2 + H+ → Fe3+ + OH + H2O  k2 = 55 M−1 s−1
Fe3+ + H2O2 → Fe2+ + HO2 + H+  k2 = 2 × 10−3 M−1 s−1
Fe3+ + HO2 → Fe2+ + O2 + H+
HO2 → O2●− + H+
Low solubility product constants (Ksp) of 4.8 × 10−17 and 2.79 × 10−39 have been determined for Fe(OH)2 and Fe(OH)3, respectively [35]. This means that homogeneous Fenton can only operate at pH < 4.0, because at higher pH values, hydroxides of Fe2+ and, mainly, Fe3+ precipitate, forming undesired iron sludge. The stringent acidic pH window is then the main drawback for the practical implementation of this method, which is very far from the pH values of 6.5–8.5 of WWTP effluents and natural waters. For Fenton reagent application, these matrices need to be acidified to pH ~ 3. At the end of the process, they must be neutralized, requiring the removal of iron sludge, which results in a consequent rise in operating costs [5].
An alternative process to enhance the oxidation power of homogeneous Fenton is homogeneous PF that involves simultaneous light irradiation of the effluent [36]. Different lamps are used depending on the wavelength (λ) applied. They can provide vacuum UV (VUV) (<190 nm), UVC (190–280 nm, λmax = 254 nm), UVB (280–315 nm), UVA (315–400 nm, λmax = 360 nm), and visible (Vis) (400–800 nm) lights. In some cases, direct sunlight (λ > 300 nm) is applied, and the process is called solar PF. This process can be mimicked with a Xe lamp, which can also be filtered to obtain Vis or UV irradiation. Under homogeneous conditions, the rate of homogeneous OH production by the Fenton reaction (1) is enhanced by the homogeneous photo-Fenton reaction (5), in which a soluble Fe(III) hydroxide species, such as Fe(OH)2+, is photolyzed [5,36]. This reaction also occurs at an optimum pH near 3.0, with Fe2+ regeneration to accelerate the homogeneous Fenton reaction (1). When a UVC light is applied, more OH is produced by the homolysis of H2O2 by reaction (6). Additionally, the mineralization process is enhanced by reaction (7), in which the final Fe(III)-carboxylate species, denoted as Fe(OOCR)2+, is readily photodecomposed by UV light, regenerating Fe2+:
Fe(OH)2+ + hν → Fe2+ + OH
H2O2 + hν → 2OH
Fe(OOCR)2+ + hν → Fe2+ + CO2 + R
Homogeneous PF exhibits the same pH drawbacks as homogeneous Fenton, which can be mitigated by alternative treatments with homogeneous PF-like, heterogeneous PF, and heterogeneous PF-like, as described in the next subsections. This subsection analyzes the oxidative behavior of drugs with homogeneous PF.

2.1.1. NSAIDs

NSAIDs are drugs used to reduce inflammation, fever, and pain, Lopez-Timomer et al. [6] described an excellent degradation of 1 mg L−1 acetaminophen in WWTP effluent at pH = 7.2 by homogeneous PF using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 15 W UVC. A fast and total drug removal was achieved in only 8 min operating with 21 mM H2O2 and 2.4 μM Fe2+ (see Table 1), demonstrating the high oxidation power of this method. For diclofenac [7,37,38,39], worse results have been reported in pure water at pH 6.2, which is far from the optimal pH 3.0 for this process [7], as shown in Table 1.

2.1.2. Antibiotics

Antibiotics are powerful drugs designed to fight bacterial infections. Due to their relevance and the influence of their residues and metabolites on the health of living beings, their removal from water and wastewater has been widely studied by PF and related processes. For homogeneous PF, the treatments of dicloxacillin [40], doxycycline [8], carbamazepine [9], chlortetracycline [41], indomethacin [42], nitazoxanide [10], sulfamethoxazole [11,34], oxytetracycline [12,43], and tylosin [44] have been assessed.
Figure 2a shows a sketch of a pilot flow plant with a solar compound parabolic collector (CPC) photoreactor for homogeneous PF [8]. This system was used for treating 4 L of 0.6 mM doxycycline in pure water with 4 mM H2O2 and 0.1 mM Fe2+ at pH = 3.0 and liquid flow rate = 30.6 L min−1. A slow 95% decay with a pseudo-first-rate constant for drug removal (k1) of 0.0142 min−1 in 180 min was found (see Table 1). Good chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total organic carbon (TOC) reductions for the solution of 81% and 73%, respectively, were obtained. The effects of operating variables are depicted in Figure 2b–d. Figure 2b highlights the progressive decrease in the normalized drug concentration by raising Fe2+ content from 0.1 to 0.3 mM. This loss of oxidation power can be ascribed to the gradual loss of generated OH by reaction (8) with the excess of Fe2+ added. Figure 2c shows that in all cases, a good linear ln (c0/c)-time plot was obtained, according to pseudo-first-order kinetics, whose slope corresponded to the k1-value. Figure 2d makes evident that 4 mM H2O2 yielded the best degradation rate. The increase in rate from 3 to 4 mM H2O2 can be ascribed to an acceleration of the homogeneous Fenton reaction (1) to form more OH, whereas the subsequent decay for 5 mM H2O2 can be related to the large enhancement of reaction (9) by inhibition of the produced OH with the excess of H2O2 added. Figure 2e illustrates the quicker degradation achieved for 0.6 mM of drug because the system produced sufficient OH content to remove more drug than 0.2 mM. In contrast, greater concentrations, like 1 mM, inhibited its removal because of the too great organic load, which also involves more OH attack over higher amounts of by-products formed. Note that all these effects are verified for all Fenton treatments due to the inherent characteristics of the oxidant OH:
Fe2+ + OH → Fe3+ + OH
H2O2 + OH → HO2 + H2O
The relative degradation rate of drugs depends on their chemical structure. This is shown in Figure 3, where the normalized drug concentration increased in the following order: carbamazepine [38] < oxytetracycline [12] < sulfamethoxazole [11]. For carbamazepine, 200 mL of 1 mg L−1 drug in pure water was treated with 0.75 mg L−1 H2O2 and 0.15 mg L−1 Fe2+ at pH = 3.0 using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 1500 W Xe light to yield 93% decay with k1 = 0.0422 min−1 and 14% TOC removal in 30 min (see Table 1).
The treatment of oxytetracycline was performed with 250 mL of 0.1 mM drug in pure water with 100 mg L−1 H2O2 and 3 mg L−1 Fe2+ at pH = 3.0, filling a stirred-tank photoreactor under 18 W UVA light, giving 97% abatement with k1 = 0.81 min−1 and 68% TOC removal in 10 min. The same conditions were used with a WWTP effluent, achieving 85% decay with k1 = 0.59 min−1 and 75% TOC reduction over 15 min, due to competitive oxidation with the organic and inorganic components of the real wastewater (see Table 1). The fastest removal with sulfamethoxazole was obtained with 1 L of 50 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 2 mM H2O2 and 5 mg L−1 Fe2+ at pH = 3.0 using a stirred-tank photoreactor under a 150 W UV-Vis lamp λ = 350–570 nm, and complete removal with k1 = 1.0379 min−1 was obtained in only 8 min. In all these treatments, UV light was applied as an effective energy source for homogeneous PF. In the case of carbamazepine, LC-MS analysis of treated solutions revealed the formation of five primary by-products, from which the reaction degradation sequence of Figure 3b was proposed. The initial hydroxylation of this drug (1) with loss of an acetamide group led to 2, which was subsequently oxidized and broken down to three benzene carboxylic acids 35 and 3-aminophenol (6).
Table 1 shows interesting results for the homogeneous PF behavior of nitazoxanide [10]. It was degraded at 1.5 mg L−1 in pure water and hospital wastewater, with 55 mg L−1 H2O2 and 10 mg L−1 Fe2+, at pH 2.8 in a stirred-tank photoreactor under sunlight. Total abatement was achieved in 40 min for pure water, with 15 by-products detected by LC-QTOF-MS, and extended to 105 min for hospital wastewater via parallel oxidation of its contaminants.

2.1.3. Other Drugs

Homogeneous PF treatment with diuretic hydrochlorothiazide [45] and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) rosuvastatin [13] has been reported. Sharif et al. [13] centered the rosuvastatin study in a stirred-tank photoreactor under 35 W of UVC irradiation, using 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water, with 0.3 mM H2O2 and 0.1 mg L−1 Fe2+, at pH 3.0. A fast, complete degradation with k1 = 0.1764 min−1 was observed in 15 min, whereas 79% TOC removal was attained in 120 min (see Table 1). Interestingly, they determined a total cost of 13.0678 US$ m−3 for this process.

2.1.4. Mixture of Drugs

The degradation of effluents containing several drug mixtures by homogeneous PF has been investigated to clarify the interference between them [14,15,16,17,46,47,48]. A mixture containing 15 mg L−1 of the antiretroviral lamivudine and zidovudine in 50 mL of pure water was treated in a stirred-tank photoreactor with 600 mg L−1 H2O2 and 0.5 mg L−1 Fe2+ at pH 2.0–3.0 under 96 W of UVC light [14]. This light yielded better results than operating with 20 W UVA and 300 W Xe lights. After 60 min of treatment, the mixture was degraded by 82% with k1 = 0.035 min−1, superior to 65% with k1 = 0.016 min−1 determined for single photolysis, where drugs were removed by UVC light and OH formed from reaction (6) (see Table 1). Cavalheri et al. [15] investigated the removal of a mixture of the NSAID diclofenac and the antibiotic ketoprofen in a stirred-tank photoreactor under 81 W of UVA light. The trials were carried out with 600 mL of 12.5 mg L−1 of each drug in domestic sewage, containing 10–30 mg L−1 H2O2 and 3–15 mg L−1 Fe2+, at pH 3.0, for 150 min. Good COD and biological oxygen demand (BOD) reductions of 78% and 62%, respectively, were obtained at the optimal concentrations of 10 mg L−1 H2O2 and 15 mg L−1 Fe2+, determined by response surface methodology (see Table 1). The authors also demonstrated the positive effect of UVA light on producing more OH (from reaction (5)) by determining lower decay rates of 65% COD and 60% BOD with homogeneous Fenton.
Figure 4 highlights a similar removal of the drugs of a mixture of carbamazepine, diclofenac, ibuprofen, and sulfamethoxazole under homogeneous PF in a stirred-tank photoreactor illuminated with 15 W UVC light [16].
More than 90% degradation of all drugs can be observed after 60 min of treatment of 500 mL of 25 mg L−1 of each drug in pure water containing 0.24 mL L−1 of concentrated H2O2 and 20 times lower of Fe2+ at pH = 3.0 (see also Table 1). Another study on a mixture of diclofenac, ranitidine, and simvastatin reported rapid abatement of these drugs within 10 min in a stirred-tank photoreactor under 56 W of UVA light [17]. A total of 92% simvastatin degradation and 100% destruction of the other two drugs, with 72% mineralization, was found for 1.654 L of 50 μg L−1 of each drug in domestic sewage of initial TOC of 21 mg C L−1 with 40 mg L−1 H2O2 and 3 mg L−1 Fe3+ at pH = 7.2 (see Table 1).

2.1.5. Real Wastewaters

The efficient homogeneous PF process has been checked directly on several real wastewaters [18,33]. For instance, the COD of 1 L of pharmaceutical wastewater with an initial COD of 4000 mg O2 L−1 was reduced by 88% by adding a Fe2+/H2O2 ratio of 1:10 at pH = 4.0 during 60 min in a stirred-tank photoreactor under 80 W Xe light (see Table 1) [18].

2.2. Homogeneous Photo-Fenton-like

Homogeneous PF-like processes have been proposed using other soluble reagents as oxidants, aiming to operate at less acidic and even neutral pH values. This method has been tested for single drugs, mixtures of drugs, and real wastewaters, as described in this subsection.

2.2.1. Single Drugs

The removal of the NSAID acetaminophen [49,50] and antibiotics amoxicillin [19] and sulfamethoxazole [51] was assessed. It is noticeable that the work of de Oliveira et al. [19] involved mineralizing amoxicillin with the recirculation system of Figure 1e using an inner UV-Vis light of λ = 200–500 nm. The trials were performed with 3.6 L of 100 mg L−1 drug in pure water, adding 1.470 mM min−1 of H2O2 and 1.560 mM Fe3+ at pH 3.0 for 120 min. These conditions were obtained by optimization using response surface methodology, yielding an excellent 90% reduction in TOC (see Table 1). The H2O2 content was continuously added from the decomposition of sodium percarbonate via reaction (10):
4Na2CO3·3H2O2 + 4H2O → 3H2O2 + 4HCO3 + 8Na+ + 4OH
For sulfamethoxazole, ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) was used as a soluble iron chelate to operate at pH = 7.5 using a tubular flow photoreactor introduced in a solar box with a 1500 W Xe lamp [51]. Total antibiotic removal was obtained for 1 L of 1 mg L−1 sulfamethoxazole in pure water with 50 mg L−1 H2O2 and a 1:1 EDTA/Fe2+ molar ratio with 5 mg L−1 Fe2+ upon an energy accumulation of 1.2 kJ L−1. The Fe2+-EDTA complex formed OH by reactions similar to (1) and (5), but maintaining the iron complexed and soluble in the solution.

2.2.2. Mixture of Drugs

The homogeneous PF-like of mixtures of drugs was developed with complexes of Fe(III) with soluble ligands (L) such as ethylenediamine-N, N-disuccinate (EDDS) [20,21,52,53], nitriloacetate (NTA) [21,53], copoazu extract [54], iminodisuccinate [55,56], citrate [22,57], and humic acid [58]. These complexes stabilize Fe3+ in contaminated solutions, which can be treated at circumneutral and neutral pH by reaction (11), which generates Fe2+ and produces further OH from the homogeneous Fenton reaction (1) [59]. Moreover, the ligand radical L that is formed evolves up to total mineralization:
Fe(III)-L + hν → Fe2+ + L
Raceway pond photoreactors illuminated with sunlight were constructed with volumes of 16 and 90 L with different depths of the recirculation effluent for light absorption [22]. Using the 16 L photoreactor, Manikova et al. [20] treated a mixture of caffeine, carbamazepine, diclofenac, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim at 100 μg L−1 of each drug in WWTP effluent with an initial TOC of 15.5 mg C L−1 with 50 mg L−1 H2O2, 0.1 mM Fe3+, and 0.1 mM EDDS at circumneutral pH = 7.6. Figure 5a shows the effectiveness of the homogeneous PF-like process applied, and in 60 min, 87% degradation for caffeine, 92% for sulfamethoxazole and carbamazepine, and 97% for trimethoprim was found, whereas total removal of diclofenac was more quickly achieved in 45 min. This behavior clearly indicates the different reactivities of the drugs during their oxidation by OH. On the other hand, Nunez et al. [22] compared the oxidation in photoreactors for a mixture of benzotriazole, carbamazepine, and diclofenac at 100 μg L−1 each in natural water with an initial TOC of 3.1 mg C L−1 and WWTP effluent of initial TOC of 25 mg C L−1 containing 40 mg L−1 H2O2, 6 mg L−1 Fe3+, and 12 mg L−1 citric acid at pH = 6.3 under 30 W cm−2 Xe light. For 90 L with the WWTP effluent, low drug removals were achieved by competitive oxidation with its constituents, and so, after 45 min, only about 25% removal for benzotriazole and carbamazepine and 60% for diclofenac were determined (see Table 1). Figure 5b highlights that benzotriazole was more rapidly degraded in pure water with lower organic load, even faster for the 90 than the 16 L photoreactor.
The degradative influence of ligands EDDS and NTA for Fe(III) complexation was studied by Aliste et al. [21] with a mixture of diclofenac and ibuprofen in WWTP effluent with a low initial TOC of 2.5 mg C L−1. Experiments were made with 500 mL of 200 μg L−1 of each drug, 1.47 mM H2O2, 0.1 mM Fe3+, and 0.1 mM EDDS or 0.1 mM NTA at pH = 6.3 in a stirred-tank photoreactor under a 32 W fluorescent bulb for 360 min. A clear superiority of EDDS was found, as its Fe(III) complex degraded 90% of diclofenac and 95% of ibuprofen, compared with 48% and 47% for Fe(III)-NTA (see Table 1).
Peracetic acid (CH3COOOH) was used as an alternative reagent to H2O2, generating OH and FeIVO2− as oxidants from reactions (12) and (13) [23,60]:
CH3COOOH + Fe2+ → Fe3+ + CH3COO + OH
CH3COOOH + Fe2+ → FeIVO2− + CH3COOH
The formation of these oxidants has been confirmed by Li et al. [23], when treating a mixture of carbamazepine, diclofenac, naproxen, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim at 1 μM each in pure water by adding 25 μM peracetic acid and 2.5 μM Fe3+ at pH = 4.0 in a stirred-tank photoreactor under 9 W UVA light. The process was very effective, and in only 15 min, the most easily oxidizable naproxen and diclofenac were completely removed, with high k1 values of 0.30 and 0.36 min−1, respectively (see Table 1).

2.2.3. Real Wastewaters

Only a real WWTP effluent with an initial TOC of 82.1 mg C L−1 with 13 drugs at 0.05–0.82 μg L−1 of each content and pH = 7.4 was treated by homogeneous PF-like with Fe(III) complexed with humic acid [24]. The treatment was performed with 250 mL of the wastewater filling a stirred-tank photoreactor submitted to a 32 W fluorescent bulb, and removal of only from 8.5% to 56% was found for all drugs with 31% TOC reduction after 30 min of adding 100 mg L−1 H2O2 and 1:6.8 Fe3+/humic acid (see Table 1).

2.3. Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton

Heterogeneous PF involves the use of solid iron catalysts to form OH from H2O2 via heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14), in which the surface Fe2+, denoted as ≡Fe2+, is transformed into surface ≡Fe3+ [5,36]. Moreover, heterogeneous photo-Fenton (15) with hydrolyzed surface ≡Fe3+ can regenerate ≡Fe2+ and produce more OH. These reactions present a suitable rate at neutral pH, improving the treatment of homogeneous PF with acidic requirements. The catalysts can be easily extracted from treated solutions and reused for a long duration:
≡Fe2+ + H2O2 → ≡Fe3+ + OH + OH
≡Fe3+-OH+ hν → ≡Fe2+ + OH
However, the process can be complicated by partial solubilization of the catalyst, which can also produce homogeneous Fenton reactions (1) and (5). The formation of O2●−, usually from O2 reduction, and the subsequent production of the non-radical singlet oxygen (1O2) is also possible through reaction (16) [5]:
O2●− + OH → 1O2 + OH

2.3.1. NSAIDs

The degradation of acetaminophen by FeS2 and citric acid [25], chitosan/Fe3O4 [26], and FeOCl [61] catalysts and diclofenac by CoFe2O4 [62], polydopamine-chitosan/Fe3O4 [63], and bentonite/Fe/Ag [64] catalysts has been checked. Figure 6a schematizes the proposed mechanism for pyrite activated by citric acid (CA) as a catalyst [25]. As can be seen, CA attacks the pyrite surface to originate the soluble Fe(III)-CA complex that can be photolyzed to Fe2+ and the radical anion CA●− by a ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) from reaction (17), followed by its attack on O2 to form O2●− from reaction (18). Further reaction (19) between O2●− and Fe2+ originates H2O2 that can react with Fe2+ to produce OH from the homogeneous Fenton reaction (1). Additionally, 1O2 can be formed from reaction (16). Total acetaminophen degradation was obtained with this system after 30 min of treating 250 mL of 30 μM drug in pure water with 1 g L−1 pyrite and 0.6 mM CA at pH = 6.0, filling a stirred-tank reactor under 70 W Xe light (see Table 1). However, pyrite showed moderate reusability, with 18% degradation after four consecutive cycles, probably due to the inactivation of the surface (Fe3+ active centers) by the deposition of by-products:
Fe(III)-CA + hν → Fe2+ + CA●−
CA●−+ O2 → CAox + O2●−
O2●−+ Fe2+ + 2H+ → Fe3++ H2O2
A good acetaminophen abatement of 95% has been reported after 60 min of the homogeneous PF process of 100 mL of 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 200 mg L−1 H2O2 and 20 mg L−1 chitosan/Fe3O4 catalyst at pH = 2.0 and 26 °C using a stirred-tank photoreactor submitted to 15 W UVC light [26] (see Table 1). The activation energy (Ea) for the process was found to be 36.3 kJ mol−1. Nevertheless, the system showed moderate reusability, with a 20% loss of activity after four successive steps.
Several authors have reported ROS generation in heterogeneous PF. For instance, Feng et al. [61] determined the effect of specific scavengers on the treatment of 150 mL of 100 mg L−1 acetaminophen in pure water with 2.40 mM H2O2 and 100 mg L−1 FeOCl catalyst at pH = 7.0 in a stirred-tank photoreactor with 18 W VUV light. Figure 6b shows a clear inhibition of the degradation rate by adding NaN3 (scavenger of 1O2), NaNO3 (scavenger of hydrolyzed electrons), and tert-butyl alcohol (TBA, scavenger of OH). Hydrogen atoms can react with O2 to produce O2. They were also detected by EPR using 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-N-oxide (DMPO) and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMP) as trapping agents. Figure 6c,d present the typical 1:2:2:1 quadruplet obtained for DMPO-OH and DMPO-O2●− adducts, whereas Figure 6e shows the 1:1:1 triplet for the TEMP-1O2 adduct.

2.3.2. Antibiotics

Heterogeneous PF treatments have been reported for carbamazepine by FeOCl-coated ceramic membrane [27], laccase/Fe3O4 [65], and Fe/Fe2O3 [66], imidacloprid with zero-valent iron (ZVI) [28], metronidazole with activated carbon/CuCOFe2O4 [67], sulfamethazine with perylene diimide/Fe [29], and tetracycline with biochar/iron oxides [68]. The degradation of antimalarial chloroquine phosphate was investigated using a biochar/Fe-Co Prussian blue analog [69].
Yao et al. [27] used the system of Figure 1b upon 1.6 mW cm−2 UVC to comparatively degrade 10 μM carbamazepine in fresh synthetic urine of pH = 6 and hydrolyzed urine of pH = 9 containing 8 mM H2O2 and 0.2 cm of membrane/FeOCl catalyst at liquid flow rate = 2 mL min−1. Blank experiments with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) of the same pH were also performed, and the solutions were previously maintained in the dark for 60 min to stabilize drug adsorption. Figure 7 highlights the similarity and overall destruction of the drug within 40 min in both PBS at pH 6 and 9. It can also be observed that efficient drug removal occurs at a slower but analogous rate in both urine effluents, reaching total drug removal in about 360 min (see Table 1). This deceleration is mainly due to the oxidation of their organic constituents (urea, uric acid, and creatinine).
Other work treated 2 L of 1 mg L−1 imidacloprid in natural water with 3 mM H2O2 and 55.8 mg L−1 ZVI catalyst at pH 7.4 in a stirred-tank photoreactor under sunlight [28]. After 180 min, 86% degradation was achieved with k1 = 0.0110 min−1 (see Table 1). Yildiz et al. [29] explored the process of 200 mL of 10 mg L−1 sulfamethazine in pure water with 5–10 mM H2O2 and 0.1–1 mg L−1 perylene diimide/Fe catalyst at pH = 3.0–7.0 using a stirred-tank photoreactor under a 100 W halogen lamp and lasing for 120 min. Using response surface methodology, 92% of drug abatement was optimized at 6.46 mM H2O2 and 0.45 mg L−1 catalyst at pH 3.0 (see Table 1). The authors detected OH as oxidant using specific scavengers and showed the instability of the catalyst due to the leaching of 1.344 mg L−1 Fe.

2.3.3. Mixture of Drugs

Mixtures of drugs have been treated with ZVI [30], sludge from wastewater [70], ferroalloy/Ta [71], and sand/iron oxides [72]. Li et al. [30] studied the heterogeneous PF process of a mixture of acetaminophen, caffeine, diethyltoluamide, and triclosan at 2 μg L−1 of each drug in natural water with the best conditions at 0.2 mM H2O2 and 0.4 mM ZVI catalyst at pH = 3.0 in a stirred-tank photoreactor submitted to 11 W UVC light over 30 min. Figure 8a shows that the percent of removal varied with drugs due to their different reactivity depending on their chemical structure.
The removal of all of them increased up to 0.4 mM H2O2 at 0.2 mM ZVI (2:1 ratio) and pH = 3.0 due to the gradual rise in the rate of heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14) and photo-Fenton reaction (15) to generate oxidant OH. The steady degradation observed at higher H2O2 content suggests saturation of the ZVI catalyst’s active centers. The same behavior can be observed in Figure 8b, where a steady concentration was achieved for a higher ZVI content of 22.4 mg L−1 (0.4 mM) at 0.2 mM H2O2 and pH 3.0. The effect of pH in the interval 2.0–7.0, presented in Figure 8b, under the best reagent contents, indicated a maximum degradation of all drugs at pH = 3.0, when the maximum amount of OH was produced. Drug removal decreased in the following order: 98% for acetaminophen >86% for triclosan >70% for diethyltoluamide >65% for caffeine (see Table 1). However, only a 19% TOC reduction was observed, indicating a hard oxidation of the by-products formed by (OH).

2.4. Heterogeneous Photo-Fenton-like

In heterogeneous PF-like non-ferrous solid catalysts, peracetic acid is used. It has been tested for the antibiotic tetracycline with MgO/Cu [31], Cu/MoS2/polyacrylamide/copper alginate hydrogel [73], and biochar/Fe2O3 [74], as well as for caffeine with peracetic acid and MnFe2O4 [32]. Figure 9a shows a scheme of the proposed mechanism for tetracycline removal with H2O2 and the best MgO/5%Cu catalyst [31] under 350 W Xe light. As can be seen, the surface ≡Mg(OH)+ is hydrolyzed to Mg2+ and OH, whereas surface ≡Cu+ yielded OH and O2●− being oxidized to surface ≡Cu2+, which was again reduced to surface ≡Cu+ by light irradiation. The treatment of 100 mL of 25 mg L−1 tetracycline in pure water containing 60 mM H2O2 and 500 mg L−1 catalyst at natural pH was highly successful, with total removal achieved in 5 min (see Table 1). The release of 40.7 mg L−1 of Mg2+ was determined after 125 min of treatment, and the production of the above oxidants was confirmed by means of specific scavengers. From the 16 primary by-products identified by LC-MS, the reaction sequence for tetracycline (1) mineralization in Figure 9b was proposed. The hydroxylation of 1 led to 2–7 with four condensed rings, which, upon cleavage of one ring, evolved to 8 and 9, and, upon cleavage of two rings, to 10. Further cleavage of these derivatives produced the benzene carbonyl 11 and benzene carboxylic acids 1214, which are subsequently transformed into final short, linear carboxylic acids, such as malic, fumaric, and succinic. These compounds are finally mineralized to CO2 and H2O, along with NH4+ formed from previous nitrogenated intermediates.
It is remarkable that the work of Yu et al. [32] was devoted to degrading 0.5 mg L−1 of caffeine, a psychoactive stimulant drug, in pure water through 2 mM peracetic acid and 250 mg L−1 MnFe2O4 catalyst at pH = 7.0 in a stirred-tank photoreactor under 4 W VUV light of λ = 185 nm. A rapid drug removal was obtained with 88% abatement with a high k1 = 0.243 min−1 in only 8 min (see Table 1). However, moderate reusability of the catalyst was observed after five consecutive runs, with a 10% loss in activity, probably due to adsorption of by-products. The great efficiency of this process was ascribed to the production of OH from CH3COOOH with ≡Fe2+ at the catalyst’s surface by a reaction similar to (12) and heterogeneous photo-Fenton reaction (15). Further oxidation of CH3COOOH to CH3COOO from OH was also proposed, as well as the positive role of the surface ≡Mn3+/≡Mn2+ pair over the stability of the ≡Fe3+/≡Fe2+ one. Specific scavengers and EPR analysis confirmed the generation of these oxidants.
Figure 10a shows the loss of 70% of drug degradation in the above process by adding TBA (scavenger of OH) in front of only 3% with methanol (scavenger of CH3COOO), demonstrating the high OH production. Figure 10b presents the three pathways proposed for caffeine (1) degradation from the by-products detected by LC-MS. In the pathway I, 1 was dihydroxylated to 2, which was subsequently broken to the imidazole 4 and the linear derivative 5. These compounds were also directly produced in pathway II, and 4 was further dihydroxylated to 6. Pathway III was initiated by the three demethylations of 1 to 3, followed by cleavage to 7 and 8.

3. Photocatalysis/Photo-Fenton Treatment of Pharmaceuticals in Waters and Wastewaters

Photocatalysis (PC) is a conventional water treatment in which a semiconductor material submerged in a contaminated solution is irradiated with light. The semiconductor possesses a filled valence band (VB) and an empty conduction band (CB) separated by a band gap energy (Ebg). The photons of the light irradiation with energy >Ebg photoexcite one electron of the CB to the VB, originating an electron in the VB (eCB) and a positively charged hole in the CB (hVB+) from reaction (20) [75,76,77,78]. The Ebg-value of the photocatalyst is thus determinant for the light irradiation required in PC, namely UVC, UVB, UVA, Vis, or sunlight. Although the photogenerated eCB/hVB+ pair rapidly recombines according to reaction (21), the remaining separated charges can produce ROS for the removal of organic pollutants. So, the hVB+ can generate OH by oxidation of H2O or OH from reaction (22) or (23), although it can directly oxidize the organic R by reaction (24). For his part, the promoted eCB can yield O2●− from the dissolved O2 in the medium by reaction (25), and this radical can consecutively produce HO2, H2O2, and OH by reactions (26)–(28). For an incident UVC light, the homolytic photolysis of H2O2 by reaction (6) can also produce (OH):
Semiconductor + hν (>Ebg) → hVB+ + eCB
hVB+ + eCB → semiconductor + heat
hVB+ + H2O → OH + H+
hVB+ + OHOH
hVB+ + R → R+
eCB + O2 → O2●−
O2●− + H+ → HO2
HO2 + H+ → H2O2
H2O2 + eCBOH + OH
In the hybrid PC/PF process, the photocatalyst with surface iron and/or other metals is immersed in the contaminated solution, even at neutral pH, with H2O2 added under appropriate illumination. This excess of H2O2 can generate OH not only from reaction (28), but also from surface reactions, e.g., heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14) and photo-Fenton reaction (15) in photocatalysts with iron. An advantage of the hybrid process is the regeneration of the surface ≡Fe2+ via reaction (29), which enhances the rate of the heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14) and, hence, the oxidation of organics:
≡Fe3+ + eCB → ≡Fe2+
This subsection details the advances made in applying the hybrid PC/PF process to the remediation of drugs in water and wastewater. Table 2 collects the main results reported for these assays.

3.1. NSAIDs

The PC/PF treatment of NSAIDs has been mainly applied to acetaminophen using iron photocatalysts, such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) like MIL-53(Fe) [79] and CuS2/MIL-101(Fe) [80], and composites of 3D hollow microarchitectures/α-Fe2O3 [106], Fe-BiOBr [81], and Cu-Fe/pillared clay [107], along with non-ferrous photocatalysts such as Ti3C2TX (MXene) [108] and carbon/Zr-WO3 [109]. Ibuprofen with Fe-TUD-1 [110], naproxen with Ag/SnO2 [111], and phenazopyridine with g-C3N4/MIL-101(Fe) [82] have also been checked.
Figure 11a schematizes the proposed mechanism for the removal of acetaminophen (APAP) with the MIL-53(Fe) photocatalyst using PC/PF under Vis light from a 300 W Xe lamp (>400 nm [79]). It can be observed that the photoexcitation of the photocatalyst and the attack of the drug by O2●− formed from reaction (25), hVB+ from reaction (24), and OH from heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14), whereas surface ≡Fe2+ was regenerated from reaction (29). Specific scavengers and EPR detected these ROS. The trials performed with 100 mL of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water, with 7 mM H2O2 and 100 mg L−1 photocatalyst at pH 7.0, resulted in 96% removal, with k1 = 0.085 min−1 over 60 min. The leaching of 1.3 mg L−1 Fe during this process demonstrated a certain degree of photocatalyst instability, although good reusability was observed, with 4% degradation after four consecutive steps.
A more complex behavior can be observed with a photocatalyst containing two coupled Fe and Cu metals, as shown in Figure 11b for CuS/MIL-101(Fe) under 300 W Xe light [80]. The two materials were joined by a heterojunction type II, in which the more energetically eCB of CuS passed to MIL-101(Fe), whereas the hvb+ circulated in the opposite direction. Thus, the ROS generation (O2●−, H2O2, OH, and 1O2) from eCB occurred at the MIL-101(Fe) surface and the oxidative action of hvb+ at the CuS surface. Moreover, the surface ≡Fe2+ and ≡Cu+ can react to form ≡Fe3+ and ≡Cu2+ by reaction (30), which can be further reduced by eCB to the former species. OH is then formed from a heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14) with surface ≡Fe2+ and a heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction (31) with surface ≡Cu+. The degradation of 100 mL of 5 mg L−1 drug in pure water containing 10 mM H2O2 and 100 mg L−1 photocatalyst at pH = 5.0 yielded overall abatement with k1 = 0.2099 min−1 in 30 min (see Table 2). A moderate reusability of the photocatalyst, with a 10% degradation loss, was observed after five successive cycles:
≡Fe2+ + ≡Cu+ → ≡Fe3+ + ≡Cu2+
≡Cu+ + H2O2 → ≡Cu2+ + OH + OH
Much slower oxidation was found in the other photocatalysts. For instance, 240 min were needed to completely degrade APAP, with 58% TOC removal, at 15 mg L−1 drug in pure water containing 10 mM H2O and 250 mg L−1 Fe-BiOBr photocatalyst, pH 3.0, in a stirred-tank photoreactor illuminated by sunlight [81] (see Table 2). Better performance has been reported for the g-C3N4/MIL-101(Fe) membrane photocatalyst under 100 W Vis-LED light for the treatment of phenazopyridine [82]. The proposed mechanism of Figure 11c highlights the Z-scheme heterojunction between the two materials, with the passage of eCB from the CB of MIL-101(Fe) to the VB of g-C3N4, making the eCB of g-C3N4 photoactive and the hVB+ of MIL-101(Fe) photoactive. The reduction in surface ≡Fe3+ to ≡Fe2+ from reaction (29) and OH formation from H2O2 reduction by reaction (28) and heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14) can also be observed. This system was applied to the treatment of 60 mL of 15 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 60 μM of concentrated H2O2 and 250 mg L−1 photocatalyst at pH = 6.5, and 97% degradation was attained in 70 min (see Table 2). LC-MS identified 10 by-products, and the photocatalyst showed good reusability, with 8% degradation loss after five successive runs.

3.2. Antibiotics

The PC/PF process of antibiotics has been studied for several iron oxides, such as chloramphenicol with zeolite/Fe0/Fe3O4 [112], levofloxacin with poly(2-vinylpyridine-b-polystyrene)/iron oxides [113], norfloxacin with Pt/TiO2/Fe2O3 [83], sulfachloropyridazine with α-Fe2O3 [114], and tetracycline with ceramic membrane/α-Fe2O3 [115] and reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/FeTiO3 [116]. The treatment of 20 mL of 4 mg L−1 norfloxacin in pure water was studied using 50 mM H2O2 and 50 mM Na2SO4 in the presence of a 1 cm2 Pt/TiO2/Fe2O3 photocatalyst at pH 6.7 in a stirred-tank photoreactor under a 300 W fluorescent lamp [83]. After 30 min of previous dark and 120 min of illumination, the drug was slowly reduced by 88%, with formation of OH and O2●− as oxidants (see Table 2). There was moderate photocatalyst reusability, losing 10% degradation after five successive steps, probably due to the adsorption of by-products generated.
Several iron-MOFs have been assessed for antibiotic removal in water and wastewaters by the hybrid PC/PF. Carbamazepine with 2D Fe2+/MOFs [117], ciprofloxacin with MIL-100(Fe) [84], sulfadimethoxine with MIL-53(Fe) [85], sulfamethoxazole with MIL-53(Fe) [118], and sulfamethylthiazole with MIL-100(Sc 0.58, Fe 0.42) [86] have been checked. Zheng et al. [84] found 94% degradation and 68% TOC reduction when 20 mg L−1 ciprofloxacin in pure water was degraded by 4 mg L−1 H2O2 and 100 mg L−1 MIL-100(Fe) photocatalyst at pH = 6.4 in a stirred-tank photoreactor illuminated with Vis light of λ > 420 nm from 300 W Xe after 120 min with 30 min of previous dark (see Table 2). Figure 12a reveals the degradation achieved by adding 0.1 mM of specific scavengers that decayed in the following order: p-benzoquinone (p-BQ, scavenger of O2●−) < L-histidine (scavenger of 1O2) < EDTA-2Na (scavenger of holes) < TBA (scavenger of OH). The formation of OH as the main oxidant was confirmed by EPR analysis. Nevertheless, the photocatalyst exhibited moderate reusability, with a 10% decrease in degradation efficiency after five consecutive cycles.
For sulfadimethoxine, a fast removal of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water with total degradation in 50 min has been reported in the presence of 20 μL of concentrated H2O2 and 165 mg L−1 MIL-Fe(53) photocatalyst at pH = 7.0 in a stirred-tank photoreactor under Vis light from 300 W Xe light [85] (see Table 2). The authors identified seven by-products by LC-QTOF-MS and confirmed a moderate photocatalyst reusability, losing 10% degradation after four successive cycles. A slower rate of degradation has been reported for sulfamethylthiazole, as shown in Figure 12b [86]. A 98% decay with k1 = 0.0315 min−1 can be observed in 100 min for 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water containing 38.8 mM H2O2 and 5 g L−1 MIL-100(Sc 0.58, Fe 0.42) photocatalyst at pH = 6.8 in a stirred-tank photoreactor under 300 W Xe light (see also Table 2). Specific scavengers and EPR indicated the production of oxidants OH, O2●−, and 1O2, whereas good photocatalyst reusability was observed after three consecutive runs, with an 8% loss in degradation.
Various g-C3N4 composites have been synthesized for the PC/PF treatment of antibiotics. They include ciprofloxacin with g-C3N4/MXene/CuO [87], furazolidone with g-C3N4/MnFe2O4-S,N-CQDs [119], sulfadimethoxine with g-C3N4/Cu [88], sulfamethoxazole with g-C3N4/CoFe2O4/CDs [120], and tetracycline with g-C3N4/Fe3O4 [89], g-C3N4/CuFe2O4 [121], g-C3N4/CuO [90], g-C3N4/Fe2TiC5 [122], and g-C3N4/FeMoO4 [91]. Figure 13a shows the effect of pH on the percentage of ciprofloxacin removal vs. time for 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 20 μL of concentrated H2O2 and 10 mg L−1 g-C3N4/MXene/CuO photocatalyst using a stirred-tank photoreactor under a 400 W Vis-sodium lamp [87]. The best degradation was at pH = 9.0 with 87% abatement and k1 = 0.0178 min−1 at 90 min, and good photocatalyst reusability had 7% degradation after four successive cycles (see Table 2). From the detection of OH, O2●−, and mainly holes by specific scavengers, the mechanism of Figure 13b was proposed.
The photoexcitation occurs for CuO and g-C3N4 with a Z-scheme heterojunction that involves the pass of the eCB of the former semiconductor to the second one, whereas the eCB of (g-C3N4) passes directly to MXene by a Schottky heterojunction due to its high electric conductivity. So, ciprofloxacin was destroyed by O2●− originated at the MXene surface, and OH formed at the CuO surface. A similar rapid degradation has been reported for sulfadimethoxine with g-C3N4/Cu, featuring a Schottky heterojunction between the two materials [88]. Overall abatement was observed after 50 min of treatment with 20 mg L−1 of the drug in pure water, using 1.65 mM H2O2 and 1 g L−1 photocatalyst, again at alkaline pH = 10.0 under 300 W Xe light (see Table 2). In both cases, OH production from surface ≡Cu+ via reaction (31) is expected.
Cui et al. [89] applied the PC/PF process to remove tetracycline in pure water using the g-C3N4/Fe3O4 photocatalyst at pH 3.0 and 18 °C in a multi-test tube photoreactor under 500 W Xe light (<420 nm) for 100 min. Figure 14a shows that total degradation with k1 = 0.03907 min−1 and 67% TOC reduction was achieved in a first cycle with 25 mg L−1 drug, 5 mM H2O2, and 1 g L−1 photocatalyst (see also Table 2). A good level of photocatalyst reusability is observed, with a 7% loss in degradation after five successive cycles. Figure 14b highlights the large inhibition of the degradation process when isopropyl alcohol (IPA, scavenger of OH) and p-BQ (scavenger of O2●−) were added to the medium. Figure 14c presents the expected EPR spectra of the DMPO adducts of both radicals, confirming their formation in this system.
Based on these findings, the mechanism shown in Figure 15a was proposed. While H2O2 was oxidized to O2●− by hVB+ formed in the photoexcitation of g-C3N4, the corresponding eCB charges reduced dissolved O2 to O2●− and were transferred to Fe3O4 to reduce the surface ≡Fe3+ to ≡Fe2+, thus enhancing its reaction with H2O2 for the formation of OH from heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14). Note that the H2O oxidation to OH by hVB+ via reaction (22) is more probable, along with the photoreduction of ≡Fe3+-OH to OH from reaction (15), as stated above.
The excellent photocatalytic performance of the g-C3N4/CuO photocatalyst for tetracycline removal has been reported by Imran et al. [90]. In only 15 min, 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water was completely abated with k1 = 0.1242 min−1 in the presence of 0.3 mL L−1 H2O2 and 200 mg L−1 photocatalyst at alkaline pH = 9.0 using a stirred-tank photoreactor illuminated with Vis light provided by a 400 W Na lamp (see Table 2). LC-MS identified 11 by-products, and excellent photocatalyst reusability was observed after four consecutive steps. The mechanism of Figure 15b was proposed for the oxidants OH, O2●−, and holes detected by specific scavengers. The Z-scheme heterojunction between g-C3N4 and CuO can be observed, along with the separated formation of oxidants. However, the possible generation of OH by surface ≡Cu+ oxidation from reaction (31) is not mentioned. Note that this tetracycline process with g-C3N4/CuO was much faster than previously reported for ciprofloxacin with g-C3N4/MXene/CuO, suggesting that g-C3N4/CuO is the best option for practical application.
Another interesting study has focused on the degradation of tetracycline in pure water using the g-C3N4/FeMoO4 photocatalyst under 500 W Xe Vis light [91]. The process was slower, and response surface methodology showed that it was optimized at 31.2 mg L−1 drug, 1.31 mM H2O2, and 0.24 g L−1 photocatalyst at pH 7.0, yielding 98% degradation in 120 min. Nevertheless, after 11 consecutive runs, the photocatalyst showed moderate reusability, with a 10% loss in degradation. Oxidants OH, O2●−, and 1O2 were detected by specific scavengers and EPR, and their generation was proposed by the scheme presented in Figure 15c. The Z-scheme heterojunction favored the pass of eCB from FeMoO4 to g-C3N4, and these electrons also caused a reduction in the surface ≡Fe3+ and ≡Mn6+ of the former material to surface ≡Fe2+ and ≡Mn4+. The OH formation from heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14) with surface ≡Fe2+ was also enhanced by the reduction in surface ≡Fe3+ with surface ≡Mn4+ via reaction (32):
≡Fe3+ + ≡Mn4+ → ≡Fe2+ + ≡Mn6+
Composites of iron compounds with those of other metals have been considered. So, carbamazepine was with BiVO4/FeOx [92] and with BiOCl with Fe2+ [123], and ciprofloxacin with TiO2/Zn-ferrite [124]. It is also included FeVO4/MoS2 [125], NiCo2S4/CuFe LDH [126], and Fe-UiO-66-NH2(Zr, Fe)/CuO [127], levofloxacin with Cu/CuFe2O4 [93], sulfamethazine with CdS/Fe2+ [128], and tetracycline with Fe3S4/MoS2 [129]. Fe3O4-FeWO4 [130], FeWO4/WO3/FeOOH [94], and zeolite/LaFeO3 [131] have been explored. In these cases, the regeneration of surface ≡Fe2+ was accelerated by the photogenerated eCB, and the reduction in surface ≡Fe3+ by other surface metallic cations to form OH from the heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14). Moreover, ROS were produced by photoexcitation of the photocatalysts.
The study of carbamazepine with the BiVO4/FeOx photocatalyst was performed in a stirred-tank photoreactor illuminated with Vis light from a 300 W Xe lamp [92]. The process was very rapid, with total abatement (k1 = 0.317 min−1) attained in only 20 min for 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 0.6 mM H2O and 500 mg L−1 photocatalyst at natural pH (see Table 2). A moderate photocatalyst reusability, with a 15% loss in degradation, was observed after three consecutive cycles. A slower degradation of levofloxacin has been reported for the Cu0/CuFe2O4 photocatalyst in pure water, under the same Vis light [93]. A 92% abatement with k1 = 0.033 min−1 was found in 90 min for 10 mg L−1 drug. This included 30 mM H2O2 and 200 mg L−1 photocatalyst at pH = 6.7, with excellent reusability after four consecutive cycles (see Table 2). The good ability of oxalic acid to regenerate surface ≡Fe2+ from photodecarboxylation of surface ≡Fe(III)-oxalate species from a reaction similar to (15) was assessed by Chai et al. [94] using FeWO4/WO3/FeOOH photocatalyst under a 100 W LED of λ = 400 nm. So, total drug removal with k1 = 0.117 min−1 and 72% oxalic acid decay was found in 30 min for the treatment of 50 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 1 mM oxalic acid, and 400 mg L−1 photocatalyst at pH = 3.0, with excellent photocatalyst reusability after six consecutive runs (see Table 2). In all these studies, the oxidative action of OH, O2●−, 1O2, electrons, and/or holes was confirmed by specific scavengers and EPR, and LC-MS identified the main by-products.
The use of non-ferrous photocatalysts has also been explored. The treatment of chloramphenicol with Zn1-x-yCoxNiyO nanorods [95], rifampicin with biochar/Co2VO4 [132], and tetracycline Ce-LaCoO3 [96] was studied. The generation of ROS occurs via photoexcitation and heterogeneous Fenton-like reactions similar to (14), producing (OH) at the surface of ≡Co2+, ≡Ni2+, and/or ≡Ce3+.
For chloramphenicol, there was only an 88% removal of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water containing 0.1 mL of concentrated H2O2 and 50 mg L−1 Zn1-x-yCoxNiyO photocatalyst at pH = 7.0 in a stirred-tank photoreactor under a 500 W halogen lamp in 450 min [95] (see Table 2). The photocatalyst demonstrated excellent reusability after six consecutive cycles. Zhu et al. [96] reported faster degradation up to 92% after 120 min of treating 10 mg L−1 tetracycline in pure water with 100 mM H2O2 and 400 mg L−1 Ce-LaCoO3 photocatalyst at pH = 7.0 under 500 W Xe light, with excellent reusability after five consecutive runs (see Table 2). These works detected oxidants using specific scavengers and/or EPR and used LC-MS to identify the main by-products.

3.3. Mixture of Drugs

A few mixtures of drugs have been degraded by PC/PF [97,98,99,100,133,134,135]. Figure 16a shows the excellent maintenance of 95% degradation for ciprofloxacin >86% for ibuprofen and acetaminophen during five consecutive cycles after 30 min of treatment of a mixture of 20 mg L−1 of each drug in pure water with 1 mM H2O2 and 330 mg L−1 SBA-15/Fe photocatalyst at pH = 7.0 using a stirred-tank photoreactor under Vis light from 400 W Xe light [97]. The corresponding k1-values for these drugs were 0.0633, 0.0431, and 0.0194 min−1, respectively (see Table 2). From the ROS detected by specific scavengers, the authors proposed the mechanism of Figure 16b, where the photogenerated eCB in the CB of SBA-15 produced O2●− as well as OH from the regenerated surface ≡Fe2+ with H2O2 via heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14). Moreover, OH was also formed at the VB of the semiconductor from generated ≡Fe2+ and hVB+.
Ahmed et al. [97] reported a fast total removal of a mixture of carbamazepine, diclofenac, mecoprop, and sulfamethoxazole of 50 mL of 10 μg L−1 of each drug in pure water after 10 min of treatment with 1 mM H2O2 and 250 mg L−1 rGO/FeS2 photocatalyst at pH = 7.4 filling a stirred-tank photoreactor submitted to 300 W Xe light (see Table 2). OH, O2●−, 1O2, electrons, and holes were identified as oxidants by EPR analysis. In contrast, He et al. [99] found a much slower degradation of a more concentrated mixture of 10 mg L−1 of acetaminophen, atenolol, and levofloxacin, and 5 mg L−1 sulfamethoxazole in pure water with 50 mM H2O2 and 1 g L−1 g-C3N4/Fe photocatalyst at pH = 7.46 in a stirred-tank photoreactor with Vis light from 300 W Xe light. After 60 min of previous dark, levofloxacin was completely abated in 20 min of illumination. In contrast, at 60 min of irradiation, removals of 92% for atenolol, 74% for sulfamethoxazole, and 63% for acetaminophen were achieved (see Table 2). It is remarkable that the TOC of the mixture was completely removed within 12 h and that the formation of oxidants OH, O2●−, 1O2, and holes was confirmed by specific scavengers and EPR.
Good results have been described for a non-ferrous photocatalyst such as MOF-Cu [100]. The trials were conducted in a mixture containing 50 mg L−1 of chlortetracycline, tetracycline, and oxytetracycline in pure water, with 40 mM H2O2 and 500 mg L−1 photocatalyst at natural pH, using a stirred-tank photoreactor illuminated with Vis light from a 300 W Xe lamp. Figure 17a depicts the normalized concentration of each drug over time after 30 min of prior dark incubation to stabilize their adsorption onto the photocatalyst. Removal of 84% for chlortetracycline, 82% for oxytetracycline, and 79% for tetracycline can be observed after 120 min of illumination (see also Table 2).
The photocatalyst showed good reusability, losing up to 8% degradation after five consecutive runs. Figure 17b highlights the mechanism proposed for this process, involving the generation of OH and O2●− from photogenerated eCB and OH from reaction (31) between surface ≡Cu+ and H2O2.

3.4. Real Wastewaters

Real wastewater has been remediated using MOF-100(Fe) [101] and zeolite/Fe-Cu [136]. Li et al. [101] treated 40 mL of a WWTP effluent containing 24 pharmaceuticals at μg L−1 content and initial TOC of 7.9 mg C L−1 at pH = 7.2 by adding 20 mM H2O2 and 100 mg L−1 MOF-100(Fe) photocatalyst using a stirred-tank photoreactor under Vis light supplied by 300 W Xe. Total degradation of all drugs was obtained in 10 h with some instability of the photocatalyst since 0.3 mg L−1 Fe were leached. It was confirmed that the generation of oxidants OH, O2●−, and 1O2 was detected by specific scavengers and EPR.

4. Sono-Photo-Fenton Treatment of Pharmaceuticals in Water and Wastewater

The hybrid SPF process is based on the application of ultrasound (US) to a solution treated by PF or PC/PF. The presence of the US not only enhances the mass transport of reactants, but also produces radical oxidants like H and OH from water decomposition by reaction (33) [5]. This occurs due to the high local temperature reached, up to 2000 °C, during the violent collapse of the bubbles that were formed:
H2O + ))) → H + OH
This subsection describes the SPF treatments for drugs, with the main results listed in Table 2.

4.1. NSAIDs

Adityosulindro et al. [102] used a stirred-tank photoreactor of 500 mL under 6 W UVC or 150 W Xe lights connected to a sono-reactor of 1 L with 20 kHz US to degrade, upon circulation, 1.5 L of 20 mg L−1 ibuprofen in pure water with 1.6–22.4 mM H2O2 and 0.134 mM Fe2+ at pH = 2.6. Good results were obtained, with overall degradation (k1 = 0.0130 min−1) in 60 min and 60% TOC decay in 180 min under the best conditions of 6.4 mM H2O2 and 150 W Xe light. Moreover, 12 by-products were detected by LC-MS.

4.2. Antibiotics

US was applied to the homogeneous PF of diclofenac [137] and imipenem [138] with Fe2+, homogeneous/heterogeneous PF of oxytetracycline with Fe2+/ZVI catalysts [103], heterogeneous PF of dexamethasone with zeolite/Fe catalyst [104], and PC/PF of ofloxacin with LaFeO3/FeOOH photocatalyst [139]. Figure 18a schematizes a stirred-tank photoreactor for PF equipped with a transducer operating at 40 kHz [103]. Figure 18b depicts the percentage of oxytetracycline removal obtained after 60 min of the PF and SPF processes of 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 60 mg L−1 H2O2 and 8 mg L−1 Fe2+ or ZVI as catalysts at pH = 4.0 using UVA, UVB, and UVC lights. As expected, superior degradation was observed with SPF and PF in all cases, demonstrating the generation of oxidants from reaction (33). Moreover, slightly higher degradation can be observed when operating with ZVI (OH generation from heterogeneous reaction (14)) than with Fe2+, where the same oxidant was formed from the homogeneous Fenton reaction (1), but at pH 4.0, which is higher than its optimum value of 3.0, it slows down. The best results were obtained with ZVI, with degradations of 87% for UVA, 89% for UVB, and 93% for UVC (see Table 2). Under the last set of optimal conditions, the authors identified 11 by-products by GC-MS.
Castaneda-Juarez et al. [104] constructed the continuous sono-photoreactor of Figure 19a with 5 W UVA light and US of 140 kHz to degrade dexamethasone solutions in pure water of pH = 7.0 with a packed zeolite/Fe catalyst. The optimization by response surface methodology yielded the best 99% drug removal and 74% COD reduction at 5.5 mg L−1 drug, 22.5 mg L−1 H2O2, and a hydraulic retention time of 140 min (see Table 2). These excellent results were much better than those obtained for single processes such as H2O2, US, or UVA, as can be seen in Figure 19b. This demonstrates the great ROS production by the zeolite/Fe catalyst, particularly OH from heterogeneous Fenton reaction (14) and photo-Fenton (15) with ≡Fe2+ at the Fe surface.

4.3. Other Drugs

Eshaq et al. [105] used a stirred-tank sono-photoreactor with 350 W Xe light and a US frequency of 20 kHz to treat 10 mg L−1 metoprolol in pure water with 50 mM H2O2 and 300 mg L−1 of a multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNTs)/Cr2O3-Sm photocatalyst at pH 7.0. Good results were determined in 60 min with overall degradation and 95% TOC reduction (see Table 2). Oxidants OH, O2●−, 1O2, and holes were detected by specific scavengers and EPR. Apart from reaction (33), the OH generation was ascribed to the heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction (34) of surface ≡Cr3+ to ≡Cr4+ with H2O2, whereas that of O2●− was related to the surface ≡Sm3+/≡Sm2+ pair with participation of photogenerated eCB and O2 from reactions (35) and (36). 1O2 was then formed from reaction (16). For this SPF process, only three by-products were identified by GC-MS:
≡Cr3+ + H2O2 → ≡Cr4+ + OH + OH
≡Sm3+ + eCB → ≡Sm2+
≡Sm3+ + O2 → ≡Sm2+ + O2●−

5. Assessment of the Change in Toxicity of Treated Pharmaceutical Solutions

The reuse of treated pharmaceutical wastewater is an important challenge, at least for agricultural purposes. Apart from the knowledge of the degradation/mineralization performance of PF, PC/PF, and SPF, the change in toxicity of the resulting treated solutions is another crucial factor to confirm or exclude their reuse.
Several articles have reported the theoretically calculated relative toxicities of the primary by-products of different drugs, detected by LC-MS or GC-MS, as a first step toward predicting the evolution of solution toxicity during treatment. The most used predictive model has been the Ecological Structure Activity Relationship (ECOSAR), which is based on the estimation of the acute and chronic toxicity of each by-product by means of bioindicators such as fish, daphnid, and green algae, and their subsequent classification within four toxic groups, considering that it can be highly toxic, toxic, harmful, or not harmful. This procedure has been applied to the following homogeneous PF of rosuvastatin with UVC light [13]; heterogeneous PF of acetaminophen with FeOCl catalyst and UVC light [61]; heterogeneous PF-like of caffeine with peracetic acid, MnFe2O4 catalyst, and VUV light [32]; PC/PF treatment of rifampicin with biochar/Co2VO4 photocatalyst and Vis-tungsten lamp [132]; and a mixture of bromoxynil and cefixime with Fe3O4/NiCu2S4 QDs photocatalyst and Vis-halogen lamp [133]. On the other hand, Wu et al. [74] used the Toxicity Estimation Software Tool (T.E.S.T) through the Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship (QSAR) method to predict the acute toxicity, developmental toxicity, and mutagenicity of tetracycline and its by-products by heterogeneous PF-like with biochar/Fe2O3 catalyst, oxalic acid, and Vis from Xe light. Another study by Alanis et al. [107] focused on assessing the loss of human carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity using the USEtox model for the PC/PF process of acetaminophen with a Cu/Fe-PILC photocatalyst and UVC.
Other works have determined changes in the toxicity of treated pharmaceutical solutions directly using animal or plant (i.e., phytotoxicity) bioindicators. Conte et al. [7] exposed the planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna individuals during 24 h to 100 mg L−1 diclofenac in pure water at pH = 6.5 treated by homogeneous PF with 1 eq H2O2 and 45 mg L−1 Fe2+ at pH = 6.5 in a stirred-tank photoreactor under 80 W Vis-LED or 125/250 W UVA light during 330 min that yielded 88% and 74% degradation, respectively (see Table 1). Figure 20a shows 100% survival of the crustacean using PF with UVA light, which is the same value as in pure water, indicating the complete removal of all toxic intermediates. In contrast, only 20% survival was obtained with the initial drug solution, which increased to 68% under UVA light, but decreased to 16% with PF under Vis-LED light. This means a large accumulation of more toxic PF intermediates with Vis-LED, which disappeared in the most favorable PF-UVA treatment, even yielding lower degradation. Noticeably, negative results were also reported by Andrade de Lucena [14] for a mixture of lamivudine and zidovudine at 15 mg L−1 of each drug in pure water at pH = 2.0–3.0 after 60 min of homogeneous PF treatment with 600 mg L−1 H2O2 and/or 0.5 mg L−1 Fe2+ under 96 W UVC, with 82% degradation (see Table 1). Figure 20b illustrates an 80–89% percent germination index (GI) for seeds of Lactuca sativa (lettuce), Daucus carota (carrot), and Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) when they were fed with the initial drug solution. In contrast, phytotoxicity decreased dramatically under UVC/H2O2 and PF-UVA treatments, as expected due to the formation of more toxic by-products. However, in most cases, a reduction in toxicity was observed. As an example, Figure 20c,d depict a very low toxicity unit (TU) for the crustacean Artemia salina and Lactuca sativa, respectively, in a mixture of diclofenac and ketoprofen at 12.5 mg L−1 of each drug in WWTP effluent at pH = 3.0 treated by homogeneous PF with 10 mg L−1 H2O2 and 15 mg L−1 Fe2+ under 81 W UVA light for 120 min [15]. This procedure demonstrated much greater detoxification power than UVA, UVA/H2O2, and Fenton (without light), even from a highly toxic initial wastewater. Similar positive detoxification results have been described for the homogeneous PF of doxycycline with Fe2+ and sunlight [8], homogeneous PF-like of caffeine with Fe(III)-EDDS catalyst and sunlight [20], heterogenous PF of metronidazole with activated carbon/CuCOFe2O4 and UV-mercury lamp [67], PC/PF of furazolidone with g-C3N4/MnFe2O4 catalyst and Vis-halogen lamp [119], and ciprofloxacin with TiO2/Zn-ferrite and sunlight [124].

6. Challenges and Future Perspectives

Homogeneous PF and PF-like processes are well-established methods for drug remediation that can be replaced by heterogeneous processes to operate at neutral pH and to reuse catalysts. While drugs are rapidly oxidized in solution bulk under homogeneous conditions, heterogeneous conditions limit drug destruction to the catalyst surface, resulting in slower degradation/mineralization in most cases. The main drawback of the latter processes is the instability of most catalysts due to leaching of their toxic metallic components and by-product adsorption, which decreases the number of active centers and, hence, their oxidation power. The excellent performance when using non-ferrous catalysts like MgO/5% Cu and MnFe2O4 opens the door to more in-depth investigations of this kind of material in the near future. Stable, reusable, and powerful iron and non-ferrous catalysts should therefore be sought to enhance drug degradation/mineralization performance. The same challenges can be envisaged for the photocatalysts used in PC/PF. The best options seem to be the development of stable MOFs and g-C3N4 composites, along with non-ferrous photocatalysts, all of which can be photoexcited by sunlight to decrease operating costs and make the process more industrially relevant. Most of the PF and PC/PF studies have been performed at bench scale and should be extended to at least a pilot flow plant to demonstrate their applicability at an industrial scale. This should be tested on real wastewater to clearly demonstrate that the resulting water is low in toxicity and can be reused, at least for agricultural purposes. A recent work over the comparative degradation of the pharmaceutical meloxicam has shown a similar degradation rate for PC with TiO2/H2O2 and homogeneous PF with H2O2/Fe2+ under UV/Vis LED irradiation, although the former yielded greater mineralization and was more cost-effective [140]. The hybrid PC/PF is then expected to improve the performance of both individual treatments. In contrast, the use of SPC is much more expensive due to the much higher energy cost of the applied US.
Apart from the above innovative recommendations, the following general developments are proposed for the near future:
(i)
Techno-economic analysis should be carried out for the heterogeneous PF and PC/PF treatments proposed to demonstrate their practical interest for drug destruction under synthetic and real wastewater conditions, and to benchmark whether their applicability can be feasible with respect to other available methods for industrial application.
(ii)
The research should be initially performed at a small bench scale with drugs in synthetic solutions to know the oxidants produced and their oxidation ability, along with the by-products formed. New and efficient catalysts and photocatalysts should be synthesized for further checking of heterogeneous PF and PC/PF processes to ensure their stability and reusability, as key factors affecting the cost and maintenance of such methods. The treatment of real wastewaters, including natural waters and WWTP effluents contaminated with drugs, should also be assessed to determine, as a first approach, the optimal operating variables for industrial-scale applications. The detoxification of the process should be well-identified to design sequential processes, usually with biological post-treatment, for reuse as irrigation water.
(iii)
Efficient pilot flow plants need to be constructed to be further scaled at the industrial level. Solar pilot flow plants to apply heterogeneous PF and PC/PF processes for drug remediation are recommended. It is interesting to note the need to illuminate solar pilot flow plants with UV or Xe lamps in the absence of sunlight to keep them working all day. In this way, cost-effective systems can be built by coupling photovoltaic cells to accumulate sufficient electrical energy in batteries to supply power not only to UV or Xe lamps but also to the flow systems. Solar photo-assisted procedures are expected to accelerate the degradation/mineralization of synthetic and real drug effluents by generating higher levels of oxidizing agents through additional photolysis of by-products.

7. Conclusions

The reviewed studies confirm that photo-Fenton and hybrid photo-Fenton processes represent highly promising advanced oxidation technologies for mitigating pharmaceutical contaminants in aquatic environments, contributing to improved water-quality protection and safer wastewater reuse strategies. Their relevance within modern water treatment frameworks lies in their ability to transform persistent micropollutants that are insufficiently removed by conventional biological treatment systems.
Although rapid degradation of pharmaceutical compounds is commonly achieved through hydroxyl radical-driven oxidation, the overall efficiency of these processes in water treatment applications is governed by mineralization performance, transformation product evolution, and process robustness under realistic water matrices. The presence of natural organic matter and inorganic constituents in wastewater effluents remains a critical factor limiting oxidation efficiency and must therefore be considered in process design and optimization.
From a water engineering perspective, conventional homogeneous photo-Fenton systems provide high reaction kinetics but require acidic conditions and generate iron sludge, restricting their direct implementation in full-scale water treatment facilities. In contrast, iron-complexed systems and heterogeneous catalysts enable operation at near-neutral pH, representing a significant step toward integration into existing wastewater treatment plants and decentralized water reclamation schemes.
Hybrid configurations combining photocatalysis/photo-Fenton or sono-photo-Fenton processes enhance oxidant utilization and improve contaminant removal efficiency by synergistically generating reactive oxygen species. However, their practical deployment depends strongly on catalyst stability, resistance to deactivation, and long-term operational performance in continuous-flow systems treating real effluents.
Current evidence indicates that future progress should move beyond laboratory-scale degradation studies toward water-treatment-oriented evaluation, including pilot-scale validation, continuous solar-driven operation, and comprehensive techno-economic and life-cycle assessments. Particular attention should be given to integrating the process with biological post-treatment, enabling reduced toxicity and facilitating the reuse of treated water for agricultural or environmental applications.
Overall, hybrid photo-Fenton technologies have strong potential to become sustainable polishing or tertiary treatment solutions for emerging contaminants in water and wastewater systems. Advancing catalyst durability, improving mineralization efficiency, and demonstrating scalable operation under realistic conditions will be decisive steps toward their implementation in sustainable water management and circular water reuse strategies. The homogeneous PF has the advantages of providing fast degradation with slower mineralization of antibiotics and other organics by means of a simple and cheap procedure that can be potentiated with sunlight irradiation. It presents as disadvantages the limitation to pH = 3.0, the precipitation of iron hydroxide sludge, and the inhibition by some electrolytes. The heterogeneous PF and hybrid PC/PF seem more applicable because they can work at neutral pH without soluble iron, yielding good degradation/mineralization performance of pollutants, and thus outperforming the homogeneous PF limitations. The instability of the catalysts in heterogeneous PF and photocatalysts in PC/PF leach their components or adsorb by-products, with a progressive decay in performance due to prolonged treatments, which are their main disadvantages. Although SPF also improves the oxidation performance, it presents great limitations due to its application to small effluent volumes with a very high energy cost, making the process rather non-viable in practice.

Author Contributions

E.B. (writing, data analysis, review, and editing), J.M.P.-H. (writing—review and editing). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the CONAHCYT National Laboratory for Water Science and Technology (LNCyTA), number 101, as the National Laboratory for CONAHCYT, Grant LN-2025-I-16, and CIIC-UG-188/2026.

Data Availability Statement

This article is a review study. No new experimental data were generated or analyzed.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Guanajuato for funding this research and Laboratorio Nacional UG-UAA-CONHACyT, LABORATORIO NACIONAL CONACYT DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA DEL AGUA (LNCyTA), number 101, as Laboratorio Nacional Conahcyt, Grant LN-2025-I-16 and CIIC-UG grant 188/2026.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kulistakova, A. Removal of pharmaceutical micropollutants from real wastewater matrices by means of photochemical advanced oxidation processes—A review. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 53, 103727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pacheco-Alvarez, M.; Picos Benitez, R.; Rodriguez-Narvaez, O.M.; Brillas, E.; Peralta-Hernandez, J.M. A critical review on paracetamol removal from different aqueous matrices by Fenton and Fenton-based processes, and their combined methods. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 134883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zango, Z.U.; Ibnaouf, K.H.; Lawal, M.A.; Aldaghri, O.; Wadi, I.A.; Modwi, A.; Zango, M.U.; Adamu, H. Recent trends in catalytic oxidation of tetracycline: An overview on advanced oxidation processes for pharmaceutical wastewater remediation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 116979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sharma, S.; Sudhaik, A.; Raizada, P.; Ahamad, T.; Thakur, S.; Van Le, Q.; Selvasembian, R.; Nguyen, V.-H.; Mishra, A.K.; Singh, P. Critical review on the tetracycline degradation using photo-Fenton assisted g-C3N4-based photocatalysts: Modification strategies, reaction parameters, and degradation pathway. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brillas, E. A review on the application of single and combined Fenton, photo-Fenton, and electrochemical advanced oxidation processes to remove diclofenac from aqueous media. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 115443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lopez-Timoner, R.; Mora, M.; Zuriaga, E.; Climent, J.; Santos-Juanes, L.; Amat, A.M.; Arques, A. UVC-assisted tertiary treatments for the removal of pollutants of emerging concern in real WWTP matrices. Water 2023, 15, 682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Conte, F.; Tommasi, M.; Degerli, S.N.; Forame, E.; Parolini, M.; De Felice, B.; Ramis, G.; Rossetti, I. Comparison of different advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) and photocatalysts for the degradation of diclofenac. ChemPhotochem 2024, 8, e202300177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bensaibi, F.; Chabani, M.; Bouafia, S.; Djelal, H. Doxycycline removal by solar photo-Fenton on a pilot-scale composite parabolic collector (CPC) reactor. Processes 2023, 11, 2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Parra-Enciso, C.; Avila, B.S.; Rubio-Clemente, A.; Penuela, G.A. Degradation of carbamazepine by the photo-Fenton process. approach towards the elucidation of degradation by-products. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 2023, 442, 114801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Frois, C.F.G.; Becker, R.W.; Luedtke, D.S.; Lima, E.C.; Sirtori, C. Degradation of nitazoxanide by solar photo-Fenton process in various aqueous matrices: Transformation products identification, pathways proposal, and in silico (Q)SAR risk assessment. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 2025, 462, 116228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Duoandicoechea, U.; Bilbao-Garcia, E.; Villota, N. Kinetic modeling of sulfamethoxazole degradation by photo-Fenton: Tracking color development and iron complex formation for enhanced bioremediation. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 4531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hossain, A.; Nishimura, Y.; Salma, U.; Tokumura, M.; Nishino, T.; Raknuzzaman, M.; Noro, K.; Watanabe, K.; Amagai, T.; Makino, M. Effects of water matrices on the removal of oxytetracycline antibiotic and total organic carbon (TOC) using four different oxidation processes. Results Eng. 2024, 24, 103183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sharif, T.; Ateeq, M.; Ahmad, S.; Ahmad, W.; Zada, A.; Fazil, P.; Shah, N.S.; Al-Anazi, A.; Khan, J.A.; Azizi, S. Degradation of rosuvastatin by UV/H2O2 and UV/H2O2/Fe2+ processes: Kinetics, mechanism, toxicity and economic assessment. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Andrade de Lucena, A.L.; da Rocha Santana, R.M.; Soares de Oliveira, M.A.; Almeida, L.C.; Duarte, M.M.M.B.; Napoleao, D.C. Evaluation of combined radiation for the treatment of lamivudine and zidovudine via AOP. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Quart. 2022, 28, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cavalheri, P.S.; Machado, B.S.; da Silva, T.F.; de Oliveira, K.R.W.; Magalha, F.J.C.; Nazario, C.E.; Cavalcante, R.P.; de Oliveira, S.C.; Machulek, A. Ketoprofen and diclofenac removal and toxicity abatement in a real scale sewage treatment plant by photo-Fenton process with design of experiments. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 110699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Calus-Makowska, K.; Dziubinska, J.; Grosser, A.; Grobelak, A. Application of the Fenton and photo-Fenton processes in pharmaceutical removal: New perspectives in environmental protection. Des. Water Treat. 2025, 321, 100949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. da Silva, T.H.G.; Furtado, R.X.D.S.; Zaiat, M.; Azevedo, E.B. Removing diclofenac, ranitidine, and simvastatin from a biologically-treated domestic sewage coupling the photo-Fenton process. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2025, 42, 945–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kumar, S.N.; Ramalingam, R.J.; Karnan, M.; Kavitha, N.P. Degradation of organic/inorganic pollutants through photo-Fenton membrane bioreactor (PFMBR) and lumped kinetic modeling in pharmaceutical effluent. Chem. Eng. Process.-Process Intens. 2023, 185, 109305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. de Oliveira, I.H.M.; Fantinati, L.; de Carvalho, J.F.; Ribeiro, K.; de Moraes, J.E.F. Sodium percarbonate: An alternative oxidizing agent applied for the degradation of amoxicillin antibiotic in wastewaters using advanced oxidation processes. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 41, 827–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Maniakova, G.; Salmeron, I.; Aliste, M.; Polo-Lopez, M.I.; Oller, I.; Malato, S.; Rizzo, L. Solar photo-Fenton at circumneutral pH using Fe(III)-EDDS compared to ozonation for tertiary treatment of urban wastewater: Contaminants of emerging concern removal and toxicity assessment. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 133474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Aliste, M.; Leon-Moran, L.O.; Martinez-Escudero, C.M.; Garrido, I.; Contreras, F.; Hellin, P.; Flores, P.; Fenoll, J. Solar photo-Fenton with Fe3+-EDDS and Fe3+-NTA at neutral pH for removal of ibuprofen, diclofenac and their main transformation products in wastewater. Catal. Today 2025, 446, 115139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nunez-Tafalla, P.; Salmeron, I.; Oller, I.; Venditti, S.; Malato, S.; Hansen, J. Micropollutant elimination by sustainable technologies: Coupling activated carbon with solar photo-Fenton as pre-oxydation step. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 113305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, X.; Zhu, W.; Sun, S.-P. Peracetic acid-based UVA photo-Fenton reaction: Dominant role of high-valent iron species toward efficient selective degradation of emerging micropollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 454, 131448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jimenez-Bambague, E.M.; Madera-Parra, C.A.; Rangel-Delgado, M.F.; Quintero-Martinez, I.; Miranda-Mosquera, D.; Aristizabal-Apolinar, J.S.; Machuca-Martinez, F. Photo-Fenton and electro-Fenton performance for the removal of pharmaceutical compounds in real urban wastewater. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 442, 141905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, F.; Luo, L. Molecular oxygen activation by citric acid boosted pyrite-photo-Fenton process for degradation of PPCPs in water. Molecules 2023, 28, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nour, M.M.; Tony, M.A. The environmental oxidation of acetaminophen in aqueous media as an emerging pharmaceutical pollutant using a chitosan waste-based magnetite nanocomposite. Resources 2024, 13, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yao, H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, F.; Sun, S. Removal of carbamazepine (CBZ) from synthetic urine by FeOCl-coated ceramic membrane: The study of kinetic modeling. Chemosphere 2022, 298, 134222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roccamante, M.; Miralles-Cuevas, S.; Cabrera-Reina, A.; Oller, I.; Malato, S. Evaluation of commercial zerovalent iron sources in combination with solar energy to remove microcontaminants from natural water at circumneutral pH. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yildiz, O.C.; Palas, B.; Ersoz, G. Environmental remediation of sulfamethazine wastewaters by iron doped perylene diimide supramolecular catalysts in a Visible light driven photocatalytic process: Optimization and kinetic approach. J. Cluster Sci. 2025, 36, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, J.; Li, C.; dos Santos, N.D.O.; Teixeira, L.A.; Campos, L.C. Removal of diethyltoluamide, paracetamol, caffeine and triclosan from natural water by photo-Fenton process using powdered zero-valent iron. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 48, 102907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Silva, M.; Baltrus, J.P.; Williams, C.; Knopf, A.; Zhang, L.; Baltrusaitis, J. Heterogeneous photo-Fenton-like degradation of emerging pharmaceutical contaminants in wastewater using Cu-doped MgO nanoparticles. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2022, 630, 118468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yu, Y.; Lin, G.; Dai, H.; Li, Q.; Huang, C.; Song, Y. Photocatalytic activation of peroxyacetic acid by MnFe2O4 for efficient caffeine degradation: Efficacy, mechanisms and reusability. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 120261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pamula, J.; Karnas, M.; Paluch, A.; Styszko, K. Comparative study on classical and modified UV/H2O2 and Fenton reaction based methods for the removal of chemical pollutants in water treatment. Des. Water Treat. 2022, 275, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bilbao-Garcia, E.; Duoandicoechea, U.; Villota, N. Dissolved oxygen changes in wastewater during sulfamethoxazole degradation by photo-Fenton treatment. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Garcia-Segura, S.; Brillas, E. Redesigning electrochemical-based Fenton processes: An updated review exploring advances and innovative strategies using phenol degradation as key performance indicator. Appl. Catal. O Open 2024, 194, 206980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zawadzki, P. Visible light-driven advanced oxidation processes to remove emerging contaminants from water and wastewater: A review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Miele, R.G.; de Carvalho, J.F.; de Almeida, J.; de Oliveira, J.H.M.; de Franca Parise, B.; de Moraes, J.E.F. Photo-Fenton process applied for the treatment of industrial wastewaters containing diclofenac: Optimization with low iron ions concentrations and without pH control. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 2023, 58, 550–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ozturk, E.; Ates, A.E.; Selcuk, H.; Ates, S. Treatment of real pharmaceutical industry wastewater by photo-Fenton oxidation using the response surface methodology, evaluation of diclofenac degradation and toxicity. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2025, 64, 102004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Parra-Enciso, L.C.; Rubio-Clemente, A.; Avila Taborda, B.S.; Penuela, G.A. Identification of by-products in the degradation process of diclofenac in water using solar photo-Fenton process. J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 2025, 20, 100924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mejia, G.H.; Penuela, G.A.; Mueses, M.A. Evaluation of a helicoidal flux photoreactor applied in the dicloxacillin degradation by UV-C/H2O2 and UV-A/photo-Fenton including the effect of photon absorption. Results Eng. 2022, 15, 100519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Boucherit, N.; Hanini, S.; Ibrir, A.; Laidi, M.; Roubehie-Fissa, M. Removal of chlortetracycline chlorhydrate by photo-Fenton process: Experimental study and ann modelling. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2023, 72, 627–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Azizpour, M.; Ghaedi, H.; Yengejeh, R.J.; Saberi, M. Investigating the efficiency of photo-Fenton (UV/H2O2/Fe2+) in removing the indomethacin antibiotic from aqueous solutions. Main Group Chem. 2024, 23, 219–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ouahiba, E.; Chabani, M.; Assadi, A.A.; Abdeltif, A.; Florence, F.; Souad, B. Mineralization and photodegradation of oxytetracycline by UV/H2O2/Fe2+ and UV/PS/Fe2+ process: Quantification of radicals. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2023, 49, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mundi, A.P.; Santoke, H. Photodegradation of tylosin tartrate by advanced oxidation processes. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 2024, 23, 1687–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cunha-Filho, F.J.V.; Silva, D.D.N.; Oller do Nascimento, C.A.; Chiavone-Filho, O.; Mota-Lima, A. Stoichiometric excesses of H2O2 as dosimetry strategy: Proof of concept for UVC-H2O2, dark-Fenton, and UVC-Fenton. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 14860–14872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Marques Cavalcanti, V.D.O.; da Rocha Santana, R.M.; Silva, F.S.; Andrade de Lucena, A.L.; Lima, V.E.; de Melo Neto, A.A.; do Nascimento, G.E.; Napoleao, D.C. Degradation of mixtures of pressure-regulating drugs present in different matrices using magnetite/Fenton. Chem. Papers 2022, 76, 6297–6308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Anjali, R.; Shanthakumar, S. Synergistic effects on the degradation of a mixture of pharmaceutical pollutants in aqueous solution, raw sewage, and hospital wastewater using UV light-assisted Fenton process. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 54, 104025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moura, M.M.M.S.; Napoleao, D.C.; Lima, M.V.; Melo, A.M.M.A.; Neves, N.S.C.S.; Duarte, M.M.M.B. Performance of steel wool residue as an iron source for the photo-Fenton process in pharmaceuticals degradation. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 41, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gimenez, B.N.; Conte, L.O.; Duarte, S.A.; Schenone, A.V. Improvement of ferrioxalate assisted Fenton and photo-Fenton processes for paracetamol degradation by hydrogen peroxide dosage. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 13489–13500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gimenez, B.N.; Schenone, A.V.; Conte, L.O. Exploring the role of hydrogen peroxide dosage strategies in the photo-Fenton process: Scaling from lab-scale to pilot plant solar reactor. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2024, 19, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lopez-Vinent, N.; Cruz-Alcalde, A.; Lai, C.; Gimenez, J.; Esplugas, S.; Sans, C. Role of sunlight and oxygen on the performance of photo-Fenton process at near neutral pH using organic fertilizers as iron chelates. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 803, 149873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Hinojosa, M.; Oller, I.; Quiroga, J.M.; Malato, S.; Egea-Corbacho, A.; Acevedo-Merino, A. Solar photo-Fenton optimization at neutral pH for microcontaminant removal at pilot plant scale. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 96208–96218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Garrido, I.; Martinez-Escudero, C.M.; Aliste, M.; Moran, L.O.L.; Contreras, F.; Hellin, P.; Flores, P.; Fenoll, J. Degradation of macrolide antibiotics in wastewater and soil by different advanced oxidation technologies. J. Environ. Manag. 2025, 392, 126859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Manrique-Losada, L.; Santanilla-Calderon, H.L.; Serna-Galvis, E.A.; Torres-Palma, R.A. Improvement of solar photo-Fenton by extracts of amazonian fruits for the degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 42146–42156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. La Manna, P.; De Carluccio, M.; Iannece, P.; Vigliotta, G.; Proto, A.; Rizzo, L. Chelating agents supported solar photo-Fenton and sunlight/H2O2 processes for pharmaceuticals removal and resistant pathogens inactivation in quaternary treatment for urban wastewater reuse. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 452, 131235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Maniakova, G.; Rizzo, L. Pharmaceuticals degradation and pathogens inactivation in municipal wastewater: A comparison among UVC photo-Fenton with chelating agents, UVC/H2O2 and ozonation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 111356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Salgado, S.Y.A.; Yanez-Aulestia, A.; Ramirez-Zamora, R.M. The direct formation of an iron citrate complex using a metallurgical slag as an iron source for micropollutant removal via the photo-Fenton process. Catalysts 2024, 14, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Valles, I.; Juanes, L.S.; Amat, A.-M.; Palma, D.; Laurenti, F.; Prevot, A.B.; Arques, A. Humic acids as complexing agents to drive photo-Fenton at mild pH in saline matrices: Process performance and mechanistic studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 111391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Subelzu, N.; Mozziconacci, O.; Schöneich, C. Near UV and visible light-induced degradation of IgG2: Photo-Fenton reaction in citrate buffer. Pharm. Res. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Lei, J.; Sun, S.-P. High-valent ferryl intermediates generation, reactivity and kinetic characterization with contaminants of emerging concern via a facile photo-Fenton competition kinetic methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 2025, 492, 138216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Feng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Tian, X.; Lu, W.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, A. Vacuum ultraviolet light-driven, FeOCl-catalyzed heterogeneous photo-Fenton process for enhanced degradation of acetaminophen in water: Efficacy and mechanism. Environ. Res. 2026, 289, 123373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Alvarez, D.M.E.; Gerbaldo, M.V.; Modesti, M.R.; Mendieta, S.N.; Crivello, M.E. Artificial neural networks for modelling the degradation of emerging contaminants process. Top. Catal. 2022, 65, 1440–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sun, M.; Sun, Q.; Zhao, C.; Huang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Ding, W.; Zheng, H. Degradation of diclofenac sodium with low concentration from aqueous milieu through polydopamine-chitosan modified magnetic adsorbent-assisted photo-Fenton process. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 289, 120771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Dihingia, H.; Pathak, S.; Lalmalsawmdawngliani, L.; Tiwari, D.; Kim, D.-J. A sustainable solution for diclofenac degradation from water by heterojunction bimetallic nanocatalyst. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2025, 166, 105096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Klanovicz, N.; Khurana, P.; Ramos, B.; Treichel, H.; Brar, S.K.; Teixeira, A.C.S.C. Efficient degradation of carbamazepine in continuous and batch modes by laccase-photo-Fenton-intensified hybrid treatment. ACS ES&T Water 2025, 5, 7253–7266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mohammadi, F.; Jamshidi, R.; Rahimi, S. Optimization of photo-Fenton process with Fe@Fe2O3 nanowires for carbamazepine degradation in wastewater. Des. Water Treat. 2025, 324, 101573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Babaei, S.; Rokhbakhsh-Zamin, F.; Ahmadian, M.; Kalantar-Neyestanaki, D.; Kazemipour, N. Photo-Fenton like catalyst system with CuCOFe2O4@AC nanoparticles for ciprofloxacin removal from aqueous solutions and effluent toxicity assessment by Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis bacteria. Appl. Water Sci. 2024, 14, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fuentes, P.A.; Pailanir, M.K.; Mella, S.R.; Quijon, M.-E.G.; Bernardi, T.M.; Lemus, M.C. Development of bifunctional biochar/iron oxide composites for tetracycline removal from synthetic wastewater. J. Water Process Eng. 2024, 64, 105509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, F.-X.; Zhang, Z.W.; Zhang, Z.-C.; Li, K.-X.; Li, Y.; Chu, H.-Y.; Wang, C.-C.; Wang, J.-F.; Chen, L.; Liu, W.; et al. Prussian blue analogue nanospheres immobilized on self-floating biochar for micropollutant degradation via photo-Fenton process. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 487, 150506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. de Jesus, J.H.F.; Lima, K.V.L.; Hammer, P.; Nogueira, R.F.P. Wastewater sludge recycling: An efficient catalyst for photo-Fenton degradation of antibiotics and effluent disinfection. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 467, 143380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Skvortsova, L.N.; Bolgaru, K.A.; Kazantseva, K.I.; Tikhonova, I.A.; Reger, A.A.; Dychko, K.A. Photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceutical pollutants under UV and visible light using iron containing metal-ceramic composites. Russ. Phys. J. 2023, 65, 1947–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lima, K.V.L.; de Jesus, J.H.F.; Nogueira, R.F.P. Powerful sand photocatalyst for solar photo-Fenton degradation of antibiotics in wastewater treatment plant effluent. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 117658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Qin, G.; Song, X.; Chen, Q.; He, W.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Dionysiou, D.D. Novel durable and recyclable Cu@MoS2/polyacrylamide/copper alginate hydrogel photo-Fenton-like catalyst with enhanced and self-regenerable adsorption and degradation of high concentration tetracycline. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. Energy 2024, 344, 123640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wu, G.; Bian, S.; Wang, J.; Wu, F.; Sun, W.; Pan, Y.; Zhao, C.; Xing, W.; Huang, Y. Construction of biochar modified multi-morphologies Fe2O3 for efficient boosting photo-Fenton organic antibiotic pollutants degradation: Mechanism and toxicity evaluation in degradation pathways. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 222, 119726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Choi, J.; Lee, H.; Choi, Y.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Lee, S.; Choi, W.; Lee, J. Heterogeneous photocatalytic treatment of pharmaceuticalmicropollutants: Effects of wastewater effluent matrix andcatalyst modifications. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2014, 147, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Suchithra, P.S.; Carleer, R.; Ananthakumar, S.; Yperman, J. A hybridization approach to efficient TiO2 photodegradation of aqueous benzalkonium chloride. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 293, 122–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Brillas, E.; Garcia-Segura, S. Recent progress of applied TiO2 photoelectrocatalysis for the degradation of organic pollutants in wastewaters. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, Z.; Dong, H.; Cao, Q.; Chu, S.; Zhang, H. Photocatalytic activation of peroxymonosulfate by Ti-oxo clusters grafted carbon nitride: Enhanced charge transfer and bisphenol A degradation efficiency. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 497, 154921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, B. Controlling metal clusters in breathing metal-organic framework nanostructures for boosting visible-light-induced middot OH radical formation. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 2510–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Fang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Qi, J.; Xu, Z.-F.; Qi, T.; Wang, L. Establishing a high-speed electron transfer channel via CuS/MIL-Fe heterojunction catalyst for photo-Fenton degradation of acetaminophen. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. Energy 2023, 320, 121979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ramos-Delgado, N.A.; Pino-Sandoval, D.A.; Lopez-Velazquez, K.; Englezos, C.; Villanueva-Rodriguez, M.; Gracia-Pinilla, M.-A.; Boscher, N.D.; Gardeniers, H.J.G.E.; Susarrey-Arce, A. Acetaminophen oxidation under solar light using Fe-BiOBr as a mild photo-Fenton catalyst. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 2024, 446, 115124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khoramshahi, H.; Karimi, M.; Teshnizi, M.S.; Markazi, S.A. Novel MOF-based visible-light-driven photo-Fenton membrane for enhanced degradation of pharmaceuticals and dyes with self-cleaning performance. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 118992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Nguyen, V.M.; Dang, T.T.; Pham, T.M.H.; Nguyen, X.H.; Nguyen, T.H. Facile synthesis of Fe2O3/Pt/TiO2 nanowire arrays composite for photo-Fenton-like degradation of antibiotics norfloxacin. Catal. Lett. 2025, 155, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zheng, S.; Shen, Q.; Chen, Q.; Lu, C.; Sheng, J.; Li, Y.; Yang, H. Construction of stable photo-Fenton system with efficient removal capability of ciprofloxacin by accelerating in-situ photoreduction of Fe3+ in MIL-100(Fe). Environ. Technol. 2024, 45, 4635–4644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, B. Constructing tunable coordinatively unsaturated sites in Fe-based metal-organic framework for effective degradation of pharmaceuticals in water: Performance and mechanism. Chemosphere 2023, 310, 136816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, X.; Yao, Y.; Wang, B. Incorporating Fe-O cluster in multivariate (MTV) metal-organic frameworks for promoting visible-light photo-Fenton degradation of micropollutants from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 137446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Imran, M.; Abdullah, A.M.; Arishi, M.; Ali, S.K.; Khan, M.E.; Fellah, M.; Chaudhary, A.A. Enhanced photo-Fenton degradation of ciprofloxacin using novel CuO/g-C3N4/MXene ternary nanocomposite: Synthesis, characterization and mechanistic insights. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 44598–44611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, X.; Gan, X. Photo-Fenton degradation of multiple pharmaceuticals at low concentrations via Cu-doped-graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) under simulated solar irradiation at a wide pH range. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cui, K.-P.; Yang, T.-T.; Chen, Y.-H.; Weerasooriya, R.; Li, G.H.; Zhou, K.; Chen, X. Magnetic recyclable heterogeneous catalyst Fe3O4/g-C3N4 for tetracycline hydrochloride degradation via photo-Fenton process under visible light. Environ. Technol. 2022, 43, 3341–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Imran, M.; Abdullah, A.Z.; Khan, M.E.; Kim, Y.M.; Khan, F. Excellent successive photo-induced degradation of tetracycline using CuO/g-C3N4 nanocomposites: Synergistic effects of CuO integration and H2O2 in a photo-Fenton system. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2025, 171, 106068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhou, G.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, C.; Li, G.; Bei, K. Degradation of tetracycline in pharmaceutical wastewater via FeMoO4/g-C3N4 photo-Fenton catalysis. Vacuum 2026, 244, 114907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Shi, S.; Wang, J.; Xu, C.; Mao, J.; Bai, Y. Selective FeOx deposition on BiVO4 (010) facet: Boosting visible-light-driven photo-Fenton degradation of PPCPs. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 117284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, R.; Wang, A.; Pan, Y.; Ni, J.; Deng, Y.; Tao, Z.; Liang, X.; Tang, J.; Tian, X.; Zha, T.; et al. Construction of an S-scheme electron transfer channel in Cu0/CuFe2O4 magnetic plate column reactor for the LEV degradation: New strategy of visible photo-Fenton system application. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 476, 135173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chai, Q.; Dong, J.; Yu, X.; Zhang, X.; Li, J.; Guo, S.; Yang, Y. Photocatalytic activation of oxalic acid over FeOOH loaded FeWO4/WO3 heterojunction for high-efficient degradation of tetracycline. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Brindha, B.; Syed, A.; Balakrishnaraja, R.; Elgorban, A.M.; Abid, A.I.; Wong, L.S.; Khan, S.S. Stabilize the oxygen vacancies in ZnO via altering local electronic structure by Co and Ni doping: A novel strategy for achieving durable visible light driven photo-Fenton degradation of chloramphenicol. Colloids Surf. A-Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2025, 707, 135796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhu, X.; Dong, Z.; Liu, L.; Hu, N.; Wu, D.; Wei, Y.; An, Y. Optimizing 3d electronic structure of LaCoO3 based on spin state tuning for enhancing photo-Fenton activity on tetracycline degradation. J. Colloid Interfaces Sci. 2025, 678, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Hernandez-Olono, J.T.; Vargas-Hernandez, D.; Castro-Campoy, D.A.; Ibarra-Espinoza, A.; Perez-Cruz, M.A.; Garrafa-Galvez, H.E.; Herrera-Urbina, J.R.; Tanori-Cordova, J.C. Photo-catalytic activity of iron nanoparticles supported on SBA-15 for degradation of organic pollutants. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A-Chem. 2025, 469, 116597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ahmed, Y.; Zhong, J.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Yuan, Z.; Guo, J. Simultaneous removal of antibiotic resistant bacteria, antibiotic resistance genes, and micropollutants by FeS2@GO-based heterogeneous photo-Fenton process. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 15156–15166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. He, X.; Wen, S.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y. Cyano-group-rich carbon nitride supported interlayer single-atomic Fe-N4 sites for photo-Fenton degradation of emerging organic pollutants. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 357, 130181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Duan, W.-L.; Li, Y.-X.; Li, W.-Z.; Luan, J. Controllable synthesis of copper-organic frameworks via ligand adjustment for enhanced photo-Fenton-like catalysis. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 646, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Li, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, B.; Yu, G. Boosting Fe (II) generation in MOFs under visible-light irradiation for accumulated micropollutants decomposition. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Adityosulindro, S.; Julcour, C.; Riboul, D.; Barthe, L. Degradation of ibuprofen by photo-based advanced oxidation processes: Exploring methods of activation and related reaction routes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 19, 3247–3260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Yildiz, S.; Mihciokur, H.; Olabi, A. Experimental study of oxytetracycline degradation using Fenton-like processes. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 11049–11060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Castaneda-Juarez, M.; Linares-Hernandez, I.; Martinez-Miranda, V.; Teutli-Sequeira, E.A.; Mier-Quiroga, M.D.L.A.; -Suarez, L.A. Commercial dexamethasone degradation by heterogeneous sono/photo-Fenton process using iron zeolite catalyst by an electrodeposition method. Environ. Technol. 2025, 46, 2376–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Eshaq, G.; Amer, M.; Khan, M.A.; Alothman, Z.A.; Sillanpaa, M. A novel Sm doped Cr2O3 sesquioxide-decorated MWCNTs heterostructured Fenton-like with sonophotocatalytic activities under visible light irradiation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 426, 127812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gracia-Pinilla, M.A.; Ramos-Delgado, N.A.; Rosero-Arias, C.; Sanders, R.; Bartling, S.; Winczewski, J.; Gardeniers, H.; Susarrey-Arce, A. Additive manufacturing of hollow connected networks for solar photo-Fenton-like catalysis. RSC Sustain. 2024, 2, 3897–3908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Alanis, C.; Padilla-Rivera, A.; Romero, R.; Ramirez-Serrano, A.; Natividad, R. Life cycle assessment of a Cu/Fe-pillared clay catalyzed photo-Fenton process for paracetamol removal. Processes 2025, 13, 3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Li, Q.; Zhao, T.; Zhu, J.; Ma, M.; Hou, G.; Fang, M.; Shen, Y.; Zhao, X.; Tang, Z.; Wu, F. Designing ultrathin single and multilayered Ti3C2TX MXene as photocatalysts for enhanced acetaminophen degradation in photo-Fenton-like reactions. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 516, 163691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Guettaia, D.; Gaffour, H. Photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol using a novel photocatalyst Zr-WO3 doped charcoal. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2025, 138, 533–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Guettaia, D.; Zazoua, H.; Bachari, K.; Boudjemaa, A. A facile fabrication a novel photocatalyst (Fe-TUD-1) with enhanced photocatalytic degradation of ibuprofen. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2022, 135, 3359–3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hazarika, B.; Hazarika, B.J.; Ahmed, M.J.K. Visible-light induced photo-Fenton-like degradation of pharmaceuticals via advanced oxidation process using Ag@SnO2 nanocomposite fabricated via a green in-situ strategy. J. Cluster Sci. 2025, 36, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Morante, N.; Marocco, A.; Monfreda, V.; Padua, A.; Sisti, M.; Arletti, R.; Sannino, D.; Pansini, M.; Esposito, S.; Vaiano, V. Fe0/Fe3O4/ultra-stable Y zeolite for energy-efficient solar photo-Fenton degradation and mineralization of chloramphenicol in aqueous matrices. J. Water Process Eng. 2025, 79, 108938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Paiva, A.E.; Guin, J.P.; Vasquez, J.F.B.; Thampi, K.R.; Sullivan, J.A.; Borsagli, F.G.L.M.; Morris, M.A. Degradation of an antibiotic via a photo-Fenton process on block copolymer-nanopatterned iron oxide coated substrates. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 466, 142925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Asif, A.H.; Rafique, N.; Hirani, R.A.K.; Wu, H.; Shi, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, S.; Yin, Y.; Saunders, M.; Sun, H. Morphology/facet-dependent photo-Fenton-like degradation of pharmaceuticals and personal care products over hematite nanocrystals. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 432, 134429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yan, C.; Cheng, Z.; Wei, J.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Wei, Z. Efficient degradation of antibiotics by photo-Fenton reactive ceramic membrane with high flux by a facile spraying method under visible LED light. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 366, 132849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, D.; Giannakis, S.; Tang, J.; Luo, K.; Tang, J.; He, Z.; Song, S.; Wang, L. Effect of rGO content on enhanced photo-Fenton degradation of venlafaxine using rGO encapsulated magnetic hexagonal FeTiO3 nanosheets. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 478, 147319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Sun, S.; Hu, Y.; Li, Z. Fe-MOFs nanosheets for photo-Fenton degradation of carbamazepine. Chemosphere 2024, 364, 143240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ortega-Moreno, G.A.; Ayala-Duran, S.C.; Barbero, B.P.; Narda, G.E.; Bernini, M.C.; Pupo Nogueira, R.F. Photo-Fenton degradation of sulfamethoxazole using MIL-53(Fe) under UVA LED irradiation and natural sunlight. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Jahanshahi, M.; Rayen, N.A.M. Magnetic S-C3N4/MnFe2O4-S, N-CQDs heterostructure from apple waste for photo-Fenton degradation of furazolidone: Toward ecosystem protection and a circular bioeconomy. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2025, 32, 102347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Garg, T.; Renu, N.; Kumar, V.; Tikoo, K.; Singh, B.; Rana, S.; Singhal, S. Intercalation of novel Ocimum Sanctum leaves derived carbon dots between g-C3N4/CoFe2O4 Z-scheme heterojunction system for boosting the radicals’ generation in photo-Fenton degradation and synchronized electrochemical sensing of sulfamethoxazole antibiotic. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 191, 1059–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sun, X.; Huang, L.; Wang, G.; Feng, H.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, R.; Wang, D.; Li, Z. Efficient degradation of tetracycline under the conditions of high-salt and coexisting substances by magnetic CuFe2O4/g-C3N4 photo-Fenton process. Chemosphere 2022, 308, 136204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Qin, H.; Huang, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Yan, S.; Wang, K. Boosting charge transfer at inorganic/organic S-scheme interface for photo-Fenton degradation of antibiotics and bacterial inactivation. Chin. J. Catal. 2025, 72, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wang, X.; Wu, L.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, W.D.; Li, W.; Wu, Z. Oxygen vacancies and interfacial iron sites in hierarchical BiOCl nanosheet microflowers cooperatively promoting photo-Fenton. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. John, S.; Rathinavelu, S.; Mary, I.M.; Babu, S.M.; Thomas, T.; Singh, S. Solar-driven hybrid photo-Fenton degradation of persistent antibiotic ciprofloxacin by zinc ferrite-titania heterostructures: Degradation pathway, intermediates, and toxicity analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 39605–39617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chellapandi, T.; Subramanian, A.; Madhumitha, G.; Elamathi, M.; Roopan, S.M. Interface engineering of 1D/2D FeVO4/MoS2 hetero-structured nanocomposite with effective interfacial charge transfer: Facile synthesis and antibiotic drug degradation. Mater. Lett. 2024, 363, 136322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Janani, B.; Sre, V.V.; Syed, A.; Elgorban, A.-M.; Abid, I.; Wong, L.S.; Khan, S.S. Constructing bifunctional interfacial electric field triggered NiCo2S4 loaded 3D nanoflower CuFe LDH as self-cascade nanoreactor photo-Fenton system to efficiently degrade ciprofloxacin. Surf. Interfaces 2025, 64, 106289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Haitosa, H.H.; He, L.; Chen, P.; Kabtamu, D.M.; Zelekew, O.A.; Wu, Y.-N. Visible-light-driven Fe-doped UiO-66-NH2@CuO p-n heterojunctions: Synergistic photo-Fenton catalysis for sustainable water remediation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 120296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Yang, Z.; Wang, J. Photo-Fenton degradation of sulfamethazine using self-assembled CdS nanorods with in-situ production of H2O2 at pH range. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 138024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Zhou, H.; Wang, S.; Jiang, J.; Shao, L.; Li, D.; Yuan, J.; Xu, F. Magnetic Fe3S4/MoS2 with visible-light response as an efficient photo- Fenton-like catalyst: Validation in degrading tetracycline hydrochloride under mild pH conditions. J. Alloys Comp. 2022, 921, 166023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Bai, B.; Cheng, G.; Chen, J.; Chen, X.; Wang, Q. Strong magnetic p-n heterojunction Fe3O4-FeWO4 for photo-Fenton degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride. Catalysts 2024, 14, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nga, P.T.T.; Nhan, P.C.; Huyen, T.T.T.; Nhu, P.T.T. Facile fabrication of LaFeO3/zeolite composite for degradation of tetracycline with enhanced photo-Fenton catalytic activity under visible light. Vietnam J. Chem. 2022, 60, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Jiteshwaran, T.; Okla, M.K.; Janani, B.; Abdel-Maksoud, M.A.; Alwasel, Y.A.; Alatar, A.A.; Al-Amri, S.S.; Khan, S.S. Harnessing iron-rich biochar boosted single crystalline Co2VO4 nano-hexagons: A green photo-Fenton catalyst for rifampicin remediation and byproduct toxicity evaluation. Surf. Interfaces 2024, 45, 103828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Swedha, M.; Okla, M.K.; Abdel-Maksoud, M.A.; Kokilavani, S.; Kamwilaisak, K.; Sillanpaa, M.; Khan, S.S. Photo-Fenton system Fe3O4/NiCu2S4 QDs towards bromoxynil and cefixime degradation: A realistic approach. Surf. Interfaces 2023, 38, 102764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhu, Z.; Zhou, N.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L. Step scheme Fe2O3/S doped g-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalysts for photo-Fenton norfloxacin and tetracycline degradation. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2023, 160, 107423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Phan, T.T.N.; Nikoloski, T.A.N.; Bahri, P.A.; Li, D. Rational design of rare-earth orthoferrite LnFeO3 via Ln variation towards high photo-Fenton degradation of organics. Adv. Nano Res. 2024, 16, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Prieto-Laria, P.; Jimenez-Rodriguez, A.; Ruiz-Salvador, A.R.; Canosa, I.; Flores, A.; Coll, Y.; Borrego, K.; Nunez, N.O.; Alonso, E.; Fernandez-Ibanez, P.; et al. From the lab to the river: Bimetallic clinoptilolite photocatalyst for antibiotic-resistant bacteria and emerging contaminants removal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 116663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Parra-Enciso, C.; Avila, B.S.; Rubio-Clemente, A.; Penuela, G.A. Degradation of diclofenac through ultrasonic-based advanced oxidation processes at low frequency. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Celis-Llamoca, K.; Serna-Galvis, E.A.; Torres-Palma, R.A.; Nieto-Juarez, J.L. Sono-photo-Fenton action is improved by the addition of Passiflora edulisf flavicarpa Degener (yellow passion fruit). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2024, 31, 64974–64986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Mishra, A.; Priyadarshini, N.; Parida, K. Synergistic interplay between oxygen-vacancy and S-scheme charge transfer dynamics in an LaFeO3/FeOOH heterojunction towards sono-assisted photo-Fenton antibiotic degradation and water splitting. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2025, 12, 5369–5388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. do Nascimento, G.E.; Barbosa, J.P.M.; de Freitas, R.A.; da Silva, P.M.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Pena Garcia, R.R.; Rodriguez-Diaz, J.M.; Duarte, M.M.M.B. Comparison of the processes photo-Fenton and photocatalysis with TiO2 supported on non-woven fabric using a LED radiation in the degradation of the pharmaceutical meloxicam. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2026, 33, 2618–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sketches of photo-Fenton (PF) photoreactors. (a) Stirred-tank with external UV light (adapted from ref. [33]). (b) Flow system with external UV light (adapted from ref. [27]). (c) Stirred-tank with inner UV light (adapted from ref. [30]). (d) Stirred-tank with inner UV light and thermostatic bath (adapted from ref. [34]). (e) Recirculation system with inner UV-Vis light (adapted from ref. [19]).
Figure 1. Sketches of photo-Fenton (PF) photoreactors. (a) Stirred-tank with external UV light (adapted from ref. [33]). (b) Flow system with external UV light (adapted from ref. [27]). (c) Stirred-tank with inner UV light (adapted from ref. [30]). (d) Stirred-tank with inner UV light and thermostatic bath (adapted from ref. [34]). (e) Recirculation system with inner UV-Vis light (adapted from ref. [19]).
Water 18 00920 g001
Figure 2. (a) Sketch of a 4 L pilot flow plant with a solar compound parabolic collector (CPC) photoreactor for the homogeneous PF process of 0.6 mM doxycycline in pure water with 4 mM H2O2 and 0.1 mM Fe2+ at pH = 3.0, room temperature, and liquid flow rate = 30.6 L min−1. Effect of (b) Fe2+ concentration with (c) pseudo-first-order kinetic analysis, (d) H2O2 dosage, and (e) drug content over the normalized drug concentration decay in the above process. Adapted from ref. [8].
Figure 2. (a) Sketch of a 4 L pilot flow plant with a solar compound parabolic collector (CPC) photoreactor for the homogeneous PF process of 0.6 mM doxycycline in pure water with 4 mM H2O2 and 0.1 mM Fe2+ at pH = 3.0, room temperature, and liquid flow rate = 30.6 L min−1. Effect of (b) Fe2+ concentration with (c) pseudo-first-order kinetic analysis, (d) H2O2 dosage, and (e) drug content over the normalized drug concentration decay in the above process. Adapted from ref. [8].
Water 18 00920 g002
Figure 3. (a) Normalized drug concentration vs. time for the homogeneous PF in stirred-tank photoreactors of (◆) 200 mL of 1 mg L−1 carbamazepine in pure water using 0.75 mg L−1 H2O2 and 0.15 mg L−1 Fe2 at pH = 3.0 and 35 °C using 1500 W Xe light (adapted from ref. [9]). (▼) 250 mL of 0.1 mM oxytetracycline in pure water with 100 mg L−1 H2O2 and 3 mg L−1 Fe2+ at pH = 3.0 and room temperature under 18 W UVA light (adapted from ref. [12]). (▲) 1 L of 50 mg L−1 sulfamethoxazole in pure water with 2 mM H2O2 and 5 mg L−1 Fe2+ at pH = 3.0 and 30 °C under a 150 W UV-Vis lamp (adapted from ref. [11]). (b) Proposed reaction sequence for carbamazepine degradation by homogeneous PF, including detected and proposed intermediates (adapted from ref. [6]).
Figure 3. (a) Normalized drug concentration vs. time for the homogeneous PF in stirred-tank photoreactors of (◆) 200 mL of 1 mg L−1 carbamazepine in pure water using 0.75 mg L−1 H2O2 and 0.15 mg L−1 Fe2 at pH = 3.0 and 35 °C using 1500 W Xe light (adapted from ref. [9]). (▼) 250 mL of 0.1 mM oxytetracycline in pure water with 100 mg L−1 H2O2 and 3 mg L−1 Fe2+ at pH = 3.0 and room temperature under 18 W UVA light (adapted from ref. [12]). (▲) 1 L of 50 mg L−1 sulfamethoxazole in pure water with 2 mM H2O2 and 5 mg L−1 Fe2+ at pH = 3.0 and 30 °C under a 150 W UV-Vis lamp (adapted from ref. [11]). (b) Proposed reaction sequence for carbamazepine degradation by homogeneous PF, including detected and proposed intermediates (adapted from ref. [6]).
Water 18 00920 g003
Figure 4. Percentage of drug removal in front of time for the homogeneous PF process of 500 mL of a mixture of 25 mg L−1 of each drug in pure water with 0.24 mL L−1 of concentrated H2O2 and 20 times lower for Fe2+ at pH = 3.0 and 20 °C using a stirred-tank reactor under 15 W UVC. Adapted from ref. [16].
Figure 4. Percentage of drug removal in front of time for the homogeneous PF process of 500 mL of a mixture of 25 mg L−1 of each drug in pure water with 0.24 mL L−1 of concentrated H2O2 and 20 times lower for Fe2+ at pH = 3.0 and 20 °C using a stirred-tank reactor under 15 W UVC. Adapted from ref. [16].
Water 18 00920 g004
Figure 5. Degradation using 16 L and 90 L raceway pond photoreactors for homogeneous PF-like treatments. Time course of normalized drug concentrations of (a) 100 μg L−1 of each drug in WWTP effluent with initial TOC of 15.5 mg C L−1 with 50 mg L−1 H2O2, 0.1 mM Fe3+, and 0.1 mM EDDS at pH = 7.6, room temperature, and irradiated with sunlight (adapted from ref. [20]), and (b) 100 μg L−1 of benzotriazole in natural water with initial TOC of 3.1 mg C L−1 and WWTP effluent of initial TOC of 25 mg C L−1 with 40 mg L−1 H2O2, 6 mg L−1 Fe3+, and 12 mg L−1 citric acid at pH = 6.3 and room temperature with several photoreactors under a 30 W cm−2 Xe lamp. Adapted from ref. [22].
Figure 5. Degradation using 16 L and 90 L raceway pond photoreactors for homogeneous PF-like treatments. Time course of normalized drug concentrations of (a) 100 μg L−1 of each drug in WWTP effluent with initial TOC of 15.5 mg C L−1 with 50 mg L−1 H2O2, 0.1 mM Fe3+, and 0.1 mM EDDS at pH = 7.6, room temperature, and irradiated with sunlight (adapted from ref. [20]), and (b) 100 μg L−1 of benzotriazole in natural water with initial TOC of 3.1 mg C L−1 and WWTP effluent of initial TOC of 25 mg C L−1 with 40 mg L−1 H2O2, 6 mg L−1 Fe3+, and 12 mg L−1 citric acid at pH = 6.3 and room temperature with several photoreactors under a 30 W cm−2 Xe lamp. Adapted from ref. [22].
Water 18 00920 g005
Figure 6. (a) Proposed mechanism for the production of oxidants in the heterogeneous PF process of 250 mL of 30 μM acetaminophen in pure water with 1 g L−1 pyrite catalyst and 0.6 mM citric acid at pH = 6.0 and 25 °C under 70 W Xe light (adapted from ref. [25]). (b) Effect of specific scavengers on the normalized acetaminophen decay by heterogeneous PF of 150 mL of 100 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 2.40 mM H2O2 and 100 mg L−1 FeOCl catalyst at pH = 7.0 and 25 °C in a stirred-tank photoreactor with 18 W VUV light. EPR spectra recorded for (c) DMPO-OH, (d) DMPO-O2●−, and (e) TEMP-1O2 in the above system without drug (adapted from ref. [62]).
Figure 6. (a) Proposed mechanism for the production of oxidants in the heterogeneous PF process of 250 mL of 30 μM acetaminophen in pure water with 1 g L−1 pyrite catalyst and 0.6 mM citric acid at pH = 6.0 and 25 °C under 70 W Xe light (adapted from ref. [25]). (b) Effect of specific scavengers on the normalized acetaminophen decay by heterogeneous PF of 150 mL of 100 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 2.40 mM H2O2 and 100 mg L−1 FeOCl catalyst at pH = 7.0 and 25 °C in a stirred-tank photoreactor with 18 W VUV light. EPR spectra recorded for (c) DMPO-OH, (d) DMPO-O2●−, and (e) TEMP-1O2 in the above system without drug (adapted from ref. [62]).
Water 18 00920 g006
Figure 7. Variation in the normalized carbamazepine content with time for the heterogeneous PF treatment of 10 μM drug with 8 mM H2O2 and 0.2 cm of membrane/FeOCl catalyst using the system of Figure 1b at liquid flow rate = 2 mL min−1 under 16 mW cm−2 UVC light. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 6.0 and 9.0, fresh synthetic urine at pH 6, and hydrolyzed urine at pH 9 were used as reaction media. Adapted from ref. [27].
Figure 7. Variation in the normalized carbamazepine content with time for the heterogeneous PF treatment of 10 μM drug with 8 mM H2O2 and 0.2 cm of membrane/FeOCl catalyst using the system of Figure 1b at liquid flow rate = 2 mL min−1 under 16 mW cm−2 UVC light. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 6.0 and 9.0, fresh synthetic urine at pH 6, and hydrolyzed urine at pH 9 were used as reaction media. Adapted from ref. [27].
Water 18 00920 g007
Figure 8. Effect of (a) H2O2/Fe concentration molar ratio, (b) Fe content, and (c) pH over the percentage of drug removal after 30 min of heterogeneous PF process of 500 mL of a mixture with 2 μg L−1 of each drug in natural water with 0.2 mM H2O2 and 0.4 mM ZVI (22.4 mg L−1) catalyst at pH = 3.0 and 25 °C using a stirred-tank reactor under 11 W UVC. Adapted from ref. [30].
Figure 8. Effect of (a) H2O2/Fe concentration molar ratio, (b) Fe content, and (c) pH over the percentage of drug removal after 30 min of heterogeneous PF process of 500 mL of a mixture with 2 μg L−1 of each drug in natural water with 0.2 mM H2O2 and 0.4 mM ZVI (22.4 mg L−1) catalyst at pH = 3.0 and 25 °C using a stirred-tank reactor under 11 W UVC. Adapted from ref. [30].
Water 18 00920 g008
Figure 9. (a) Proposed mechanism for the production of oxidants by heterogeneous PF-like of tetracycline with H2O2 and MgO/5%Cu catalyst under 350 W Xe light. (b) Proposed reaction sequence for tetracycline mineralization in such a process. Adapted from ref. [31].
Figure 9. (a) Proposed mechanism for the production of oxidants by heterogeneous PF-like of tetracycline with H2O2 and MgO/5%Cu catalyst under 350 W Xe light. (b) Proposed reaction sequence for tetracycline mineralization in such a process. Adapted from ref. [31].
Water 18 00920 g009
Figure 10. (a) Effect of 1 mM MeOH and 0.8 mM TBA as specific scavengers on the percent of caffeine removal after 8 min of heterogeneous PF-like of 0.5 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 2 mM peracetic acid and 250 mg L−1 MnFe2O4 catalyst at pH = 7.0 and 25 °C using a stirred-tank photoreactor under a 4 W VUV lamp. (b) Proposed reaction sequence for caffeine degradation in the above process. Adapted from ref. [32].
Figure 10. (a) Effect of 1 mM MeOH and 0.8 mM TBA as specific scavengers on the percent of caffeine removal after 8 min of heterogeneous PF-like of 0.5 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 2 mM peracetic acid and 250 mg L−1 MnFe2O4 catalyst at pH = 7.0 and 25 °C using a stirred-tank photoreactor under a 4 W VUV lamp. (b) Proposed reaction sequence for caffeine degradation in the above process. Adapted from ref. [32].
Water 18 00920 g010
Figure 11. Proposed mechanism for photocatalysis (PC)/PF processes of (a,b) acetaminophen (APAP) and (c) phenazopyridin. (a) MIL-53(Fe) photocatalyst under 300 W Xe light (Vis) (adapted from ref. [79]). (b) CuS/MIL-101(Fe) photocatalyst under 300 W Xe light (adapted from ref. [80]). (c) g-C3N4/MIL-101(Fe) membrane photocatalyst under 100 W Vis-LED light (adapted from ref. [82]).
Figure 11. Proposed mechanism for photocatalysis (PC)/PF processes of (a,b) acetaminophen (APAP) and (c) phenazopyridin. (a) MIL-53(Fe) photocatalyst under 300 W Xe light (Vis) (adapted from ref. [79]). (b) CuS/MIL-101(Fe) photocatalyst under 300 W Xe light (adapted from ref. [80]). (c) g-C3N4/MIL-101(Fe) membrane photocatalyst under 100 W Vis-LED light (adapted from ref. [82]).
Water 18 00920 g011
Figure 12. (a) Effect of 0.1 mM of specific scavengers over the percent of ciprofloxacin (CIP) removal after 120 min of PC/PF of 50 mL of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 4 mg L−1 H2O2 and 100 mg L−1 MIL-100(Fe) photocatalyst at pH = 6.4 and 25 °C, with 30 min of previous dark, using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 300 W Xe light (Vis) (control) (adapted from ref. [84]). (b) Normalized drug content vs. time for the PC/PF treatment of (◆) 20 mL of 10 mg L−1 sulfamethylthiazole in pure water with 38.8 mM H2O2 and 5 g L−1 MIL-100(Sc 0.58, Fe 0.42) photocatalyst at pH = 6.8 and 25 °C using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 300 W Xe light (adapted from ref. [86]), and (▼) 20 mL of 20 mg L−1 sulfadimethoxine in pure water with 1.65 mM H2O2 and 1 g L−1 g-C3N4/Cu photocatalyst at pH = 10.0 and room temperature using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 300 W Xe light. Adapted from ref. [88].
Figure 12. (a) Effect of 0.1 mM of specific scavengers over the percent of ciprofloxacin (CIP) removal after 120 min of PC/PF of 50 mL of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 4 mg L−1 H2O2 and 100 mg L−1 MIL-100(Fe) photocatalyst at pH = 6.4 and 25 °C, with 30 min of previous dark, using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 300 W Xe light (Vis) (control) (adapted from ref. [84]). (b) Normalized drug content vs. time for the PC/PF treatment of (◆) 20 mL of 10 mg L−1 sulfamethylthiazole in pure water with 38.8 mM H2O2 and 5 g L−1 MIL-100(Sc 0.58, Fe 0.42) photocatalyst at pH = 6.8 and 25 °C using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 300 W Xe light (adapted from ref. [86]), and (▼) 20 mL of 20 mg L−1 sulfadimethoxine in pure water with 1.65 mM H2O2 and 1 g L−1 g-C3N4/Cu photocatalyst at pH = 10.0 and room temperature using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 300 W Xe light. Adapted from ref. [88].
Water 18 00920 g012
Figure 13. (a) Effect of pH on the percentage of CIP removal vs time for the PC/PF treatment of 100 mL of 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 20 μL concentrated H2O2 and 10 mg L−1 g-C3N4/MXene/CuO photocatalyst using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 400 W Vis-sodium lamp. (b) Proposed mechanism for this process. Adapted from ref. [87].
Figure 13. (a) Effect of pH on the percentage of CIP removal vs time for the PC/PF treatment of 100 mL of 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 20 μL concentrated H2O2 and 10 mg L−1 g-C3N4/MXene/CuO photocatalyst using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 400 W Vis-sodium lamp. (b) Proposed mechanism for this process. Adapted from ref. [87].
Water 18 00920 g013
Figure 14. (a) Influence of the number of successive cycles on the change in normalized tetracycline (TC) concentration and TOC removal with time after 100 min of the PC/PF process of 50 mL of 25 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 5 mM H2O2 and 1 g L−1 g-C3N4/Fe3O4 photocatalyst at pH = 3.0 and 18 °C using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 500 W Xe light (Vis). (b) Effect of specific scavengers on the above treatment. (c) EPR spectra recorded for the DMPO-OH and DMPO-O2●− adducts in the above conditions without the drug and 50 mM DMPO. Adapted from ref. [89].
Figure 14. (a) Influence of the number of successive cycles on the change in normalized tetracycline (TC) concentration and TOC removal with time after 100 min of the PC/PF process of 50 mL of 25 mg L−1 drug in pure water with 5 mM H2O2 and 1 g L−1 g-C3N4/Fe3O4 photocatalyst at pH = 3.0 and 18 °C using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 500 W Xe light (Vis). (b) Effect of specific scavengers on the above treatment. (c) EPR spectra recorded for the DMPO-OH and DMPO-O2●− adducts in the above conditions without the drug and 50 mM DMPO. Adapted from ref. [89].
Water 18 00920 g014
Figure 15. Proposed PC/PF mechanisms for the generation of oxidants for tetracycline (TC) removal. (a) g-C3N4/Fe3O4 photocatalyst under 500 W Xe light (Vis) (adapted from ref. [89]. (b) g-C3N4/CuO photocatalyst under 400 W Vis-Na lamp (adapted from ref. [90]). (c) g-C3N4/FeMoO4 photocatalyst under 500 W Xe light (Vis) (adapted from ref. [91]).
Figure 15. Proposed PC/PF mechanisms for the generation of oxidants for tetracycline (TC) removal. (a) g-C3N4/Fe3O4 photocatalyst under 500 W Xe light (Vis) (adapted from ref. [89]. (b) g-C3N4/CuO photocatalyst under 400 W Vis-Na lamp (adapted from ref. [90]). (c) g-C3N4/FeMoO4 photocatalyst under 500 W Xe light (Vis) (adapted from ref. [91]).
Water 18 00920 g015
Figure 16. (a) Effect of 5 successive cycles on the percentage of drug removal after 30 min of PC/PF treatment of 450 mL of a mixture of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and ciprofloxacin at 20 mg L−1 each in pure water with 1 mM H2O2 and 330 mg L−1 SBA-15/Fe photocatalyst at pH = 7.0 and room temperature using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 400 W Xe light (Vis). (b) Proposed reaction mechanism for the generation of oxidants in the SBA-15/Fe photocatalyst. Adapted from ref. [97].
Figure 16. (a) Effect of 5 successive cycles on the percentage of drug removal after 30 min of PC/PF treatment of 450 mL of a mixture of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and ciprofloxacin at 20 mg L−1 each in pure water with 1 mM H2O2 and 330 mg L−1 SBA-15/Fe photocatalyst at pH = 7.0 and room temperature using a stirred-tank photoreactor under 400 W Xe light (Vis). (b) Proposed reaction mechanism for the generation of oxidants in the SBA-15/Fe photocatalyst. Adapted from ref. [97].
Water 18 00920 g016
Figure 17. (a) Change in normalized drug concentration with time for the PC/PF process of 100 mL of a mixture of tetracycline, oxytetracycline, and chlortetracycline at 50 mg L−1 each in pure water containing 40 mM H2O2 and 500 mg L−1 MOF-Cu photocatalyst at natural pH and room temperature, filling a stirred-tank photoreactor under 300 W Xe light (Vis). The solution was maintained in the dark for 30 min before light application. (b) Proposed mechanism for the generation of oxidants in the MOF-Cu photocatalyst. Adapted from ref. [100].
Figure 17. (a) Change in normalized drug concentration with time for the PC/PF process of 100 mL of a mixture of tetracycline, oxytetracycline, and chlortetracycline at 50 mg L−1 each in pure water containing 40 mM H2O2 and 500 mg L−1 MOF-Cu photocatalyst at natural pH and room temperature, filling a stirred-tank photoreactor under 300 W Xe light (Vis). The solution was maintained in the dark for 30 min before light application. (b) Proposed mechanism for the generation of oxidants in the MOF-Cu photocatalyst. Adapted from ref. [100].
Water 18 00920 g017
Figure 18. (a) Scheme of the stirred-tank photoreactor used for the PF and SPF processes of 10 mg L−1 oxytetracycline in pure water with 60 mg L−1 H2O2 and 8 mg L−1 Fe2+ or ZVI catalyst at pH = 4.0 and room temperature under UVA, UVB, or UVC light and 40 kHz US. (b) Percentage of drug removal obtained after 60 min of the above treatments. Adapted from ref. [103].
Figure 18. (a) Scheme of the stirred-tank photoreactor used for the PF and SPF processes of 10 mg L−1 oxytetracycline in pure water with 60 mg L−1 H2O2 and 8 mg L−1 Fe2+ or ZVI catalyst at pH = 4.0 and room temperature under UVA, UVB, or UVC light and 40 kHz US. (b) Percentage of drug removal obtained after 60 min of the above treatments. Adapted from ref. [103].
Water 18 00920 g018
Figure 19. (a) Scheme of the continuous-flow sono-photoreactor used for the sono-PF (SPF) of 5.5 mg L−1 dexamethasone in pure water with 22.5 mg L−1 H2O2 and packed zeolite/Fe catalyst under 5W UVA light and 140 kHz US at hydraulic retention time = 140 min. (b) Percent of drug removal for different processes. Adapted from ref. [104].
Figure 19. (a) Scheme of the continuous-flow sono-photoreactor used for the sono-PF (SPF) of 5.5 mg L−1 dexamethasone in pure water with 22.5 mg L−1 H2O2 and packed zeolite/Fe catalyst under 5W UVA light and 140 kHz US at hydraulic retention time = 140 min. (b) Percent of drug removal for different processes. Adapted from ref. [104].
Water 18 00920 g019
Figure 20. (a) Percentage of survival of the planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna individuals after 24 h of exposure to different solutions, including control in pure water. The initial drug solution consisted of 1 L of 100 mg L−1 diclofenac in pure water at pH = 6.5 and was treated during 330 min with 1 eq H2O2 and 45 mg L−1 Fe2+ in a stirred-tank photoreactor under 80 W Vis-LED or 125/250 W UVA light by homogeneous PF (adapted from ref. [7]). (b) Percentage of germination index (GI) for seeds of Lactuca sativa (lettuce), Daucus carota (carrot), and Solano lycopersicum (tomato) feed with a solution containing a mixture of lamivudine and zidovudine at 15 mg L−1 each in pure water at pH = 2.0–3.0, before and after homogeneous PF treatment with 600 mg L−1 H2O2 and/or 0.5 mg L−1 Fe2+ under 96 W UVC lasting 60 min (adapted from ref. [14]). Toxicity unit determined for the bioindicators (c) crustacean Artemia salina and (d) Lactuca sativa before and after treatment with homogeneous PF with a mixture of ketoprofen and diclofenac at 12.5 mg L−1 each in WWTP effluent at pH = 3.0 using 10 mg L−1 H2O2 and 15 mg L−1 Fe2+ under 81 W UVA light for 120 min (adapted from ref. [15]).
Figure 20. (a) Percentage of survival of the planktonic crustacean Daphnia magna individuals after 24 h of exposure to different solutions, including control in pure water. The initial drug solution consisted of 1 L of 100 mg L−1 diclofenac in pure water at pH = 6.5 and was treated during 330 min with 1 eq H2O2 and 45 mg L−1 Fe2+ in a stirred-tank photoreactor under 80 W Vis-LED or 125/250 W UVA light by homogeneous PF (adapted from ref. [7]). (b) Percentage of germination index (GI) for seeds of Lactuca sativa (lettuce), Daucus carota (carrot), and Solano lycopersicum (tomato) feed with a solution containing a mixture of lamivudine and zidovudine at 15 mg L−1 each in pure water at pH = 2.0–3.0, before and after homogeneous PF treatment with 600 mg L−1 H2O2 and/or 0.5 mg L−1 Fe2+ under 96 W UVC lasting 60 min (adapted from ref. [14]). Toxicity unit determined for the bioindicators (c) crustacean Artemia salina and (d) Lactuca sativa before and after treatment with homogeneous PF with a mixture of ketoprofen and diclofenac at 12.5 mg L−1 each in WWTP effluent at pH = 3.0 using 10 mg L−1 H2O2 and 15 mg L−1 Fe2+ under 81 W UVA light for 120 min (adapted from ref. [15]).
Water 18 00920 g020
Table 1. Relevant results obtained for homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton (PF) and photo-Fenton-like treatments of pharmaceuticals in waters.
Table 1. Relevant results obtained for homogeneous and heterogeneous photo-Fenton (PF) and photo-Fenton-like treatments of pharmaceuticals in waters.
PollutantSystemExperimental RemarksBest ResultsRef.
Homogeneous PF
NSAIDs
AcetaminophenStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 15 W UVC100 mL of 1 mg L−1 drug in WWTP effluent, 0–107 mM H2O2, 0–29 μM Fe2+, pH = 7.2, 25 °C, 20 minOverall degradation in 8 min with 21 mM H2O2 and 2.4 μM Fe2+[6]
DiclofenacStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 80 W Vis-LED or 125/250 W UVA1 L with Vis-LED and 250 mL with UVA. 100 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 1 eq H2O2, 45 mg L−1 Fe2+, pH = 6.5. Room temperature for 330 min88% degradation for Vis-LED at 330 min and 78% degradation for UVA at 220 min[7]
Antibiotics
DoxycyclinePilot flow plant with solar CPC a photoreactor of Figure 2a, H2O2, Fe2+, sunlight4 L of 0.06 mM drug in pure water, 4 mM H2O2, 0.1 mM Fe2+, pH = 3.0. Room temperature, liquid flow rate = 30.6 L min−1, 180 min95% removal with k1 = 0.0142 min−1. 81% and 73% of COD and TOC reductions[8]
CarbamazepineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 1500 W Xe200 mL of 1 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 0.75 mg L−1 H2O2, 0.15 mg L−1 Fe2+, pH = 3.0. 35 °C, 30 min93% decay with k1 = 0.0422 min−1 and 14% TOC removal. Detection of 5 by-products by LC-MS[9]
NitazoxanideStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, sunlight1 L of 1.5 mg L−1 drug in pure water and hospital wastewater, 55 mg L−1 H2O2, 10 mg L−1 Fe2+, pH = 2.8, room temperature, 105 minTotal degradation in 40 min for pure water and 105 min for hospital wastewater. Detection of 15 by-products by LC-QTOF-MS[10]
SulfamethoxazoleStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 150 W UV-Vis lamp (λ = 350–570 nm)1 L of 50 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 2 mM H2O2, 5 mg L−1 Fe2+, pH = 3.0, 30 °C, 30 minComplete removal with k1 = 1.0379 min−1 in 8 min. Release of SO42− and NO3[11]
OxytetracyclineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 18 W UVA250 mL of 0.1 mM drug in pure water and WWTP effluent, 100 mg L−1 H2O2, 3 mg L−1 Fe2+, pH = 3.0, room temperature, 30 min97% abatement with k1 = 0.81 min−1 in 10 min for pure water and 95% decay with k1 = 0.59 min−1 in 15 min for WWTP effluent. 68% and 75% TOC reduction, respectively. Evolution of OH concentration[12]
Other drugs
RosuvastatinStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 35 W UVC20 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 0.3 mM H2O2, 0.1 mg L−1 Fe2+, pH = 3.0, room temperature, 120 minTotal degradation with k1 = 0.1764 min−1 in 15 min and 79% TOC removal in 120 min. Total cost = 13.0678 US$ m−3[13]
Mixture of drugs
Lamivudine, ZidovudineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 96 W UVC, 20 W UVA, 300 W Xe50 mL of 15 mg L−1 of each drug in pure water, 600 mg L−1 H2O2, 0.5 mg L−1 Fe2+, pH = 2.0–3.0, room temperature, 60 min82% degradation of the mixture with UVC with k1 = 0.035 min−1 > 65% with k1 = 0.016 min−1 for photolysis[14]
Diclofenac, KetoprofenStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 81 W UVA600 mL of 12.5 mg L−1 of each drug in domestic sewage, 10–30 mg L−1 H2O2, 3–15 mg L−1 Fe2+, pH = 3.0, 23 °C, 150 minOptimization by response surface methodology = 78% COD and 62% BOD removals for 10 mg L−1 H2O2, and 15 mg L−1 Fe2+, for Fenton, 65% and 60%, respectively[15]
Carbamazepine, Diclofenac, Ibuprofen, SulfamethoxazoleStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 15 W UVC500 mL of 25 mg L−1 of each drug in pure water, 0,24 mL L−1 of concentrated H2O2, 20 times lower for Fe2+, pH = 3.0, 20 °C, 60 minMore than 90% degradation of all drugs[16]
Diclofenac, Ranitidine, SimvastatinStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe3+, 56 W UVA1.654 L of 50 μg L−1 of each drug in domestic sewage (TOC0 = 21 mg C L−1), 40 mg L−1 H2O2, 3 mg L−1 Fe3+, pH = 7.2, room temperature, 10 minDegradation = 97% simvastatin < 100% for diclofenac and ranitidine. 72% mineralization[17]
Real wastewaters
Pharmaceutical wastewaterStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 80 W Xe1 L of wastewater (COD0 = 4000 mg O2 L−1), 1:10 Fe2+/H2O2, pH = 4.0, 35 °C, 60 min88% COD reduction[18]
Homogeneous PF-like
Antibiotics
AmoxicillinFigure 1e, sodium percarbonate, Fe3+, UV-Vis (λ = 200–500 nm)3.6 L of 100 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 1.470 mM min−1 H2O2, 1.560 mM Fe3+, pH = 3.0, 35 °C, 120 minOptimization by response surface methodology yielding 90% TOC removal[19]
Mixture of drugs
Caffeine, Carbamazepine, Diclofenac, Sulfamethoxazole, TrimethoprimRaceway pond photoreactor of Figure 5a, H2O2, Fe(III)-EDDS b, sunlight100 μg L−1 of each drug in WWTP effluent (TOC0 = 15,5 mg C L−1), 50 mg L−1 H2O2, 0.1 mM Fe3+, 0.1 mM EDDS, pH = 7.6, room temperature, 60 minDegradation = 87% for caffeine <92% for sulfamethoxazole and carbamazepine <97% for trimethoprim <100% at 45 min for diclofenac[20]
Diclofenac, IbuprofenStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe(III)-EDDS, Fe(III)-NTA c, 32 W fluorescent bulb500 mL of 200 μg L−1 of each drug in WWTP effluent (TOC0 = 2.5 mg C L−1), 1.47 mM H2O2, 0.1 mM Fe3+, 0.1 mM EDDS, 0.1 mM NTA, pH = 6.3, room temperature, 360 minDegradation = 90% and 48% for diclofenac, and 95% and 47% for ibuprofen using Fe(III)-EDDS and Fe(III)-NTA. Detection of 2 and 1 by-products for diclofenac and ibuprofen, respectively[21]
Benzotriazole, Carbamazepine, DiclofenacRaceway pond photoreactors of Figure 5a,b, H2O2, Fe(III)-citrate, 30 W cm−2 Xe (λ > 290 nm)100 μg L−1 of each drug in WWTP effluent (TOC0 = 25 mg C L−1), 40 mg L−1 H2O2, 6 mg L−1 Fe3+, 12 mg L−1 citric acid, pH = 6.3, room temperature, 45 minAbout 25% removal for benzotriazole and carbamazepine <60% for diclofenac with WWTP effluent[22]
Carbamazepine, Diclofenac, Naproxen, Sulfamethoxazole, TrimethoprimStirred-tank photoreactor, peracetic acid, Fe2+. 9 W UVA200 mL of 1 μM of each drug in pure water, 25 μM peracetic acid, 2.5 μM Fe3+, pH = 4.0, 25 °C, 15 minDegradation = 30% for sulfamethoxazole <45% for carbamazepine <62% for trimethoprim, and <100% for naproxen and diclofenac. Corresponding k1-values = 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.30, and 0.36 min−1. FeIVO2+ and OH as oxidants detected by specific scavengers[23]
Real wastewaters
WWTP effluentStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe3+. humic acid, 32 W fluorescent bulb250 mL of WWTP effluent (TOC0 = 82.1 mg C L−1), 100 mg L−1 H2O2, 1:6.8 Fe3+/humic acid, pH = 7.4, room temperature, 30 minRemoval of between 8.5% and 56% of all drugs. 31% TOC reduction[24]
Heterogeneous PF
NSAIDs
AcetaminophenStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2 generated, pyrite catalyst, citric acid, 70 W Xe (λ > 350 nm)250 mL of 30 μM drug in pure water, 1 g L−1 pyrite, 0.6 mM citric acid, pH = 6.0. 25 °C, 30 minTotal drug removal, 27 μM of Fe released and 75% citric acid destroyed. OH as oxidant detected by specific scavengers. Moderate reusability, losing 18% degradation after 4 consecutive cycles[25]
AcetaminophenStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, chitosan/Fe3O4 catalyst, 15 W UVC100 mL of 5–100 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 50–400 mg L−1 H2O2, 5–100 mg L−1 catalyst, pH = 2.0–6.0. 26–60 °C, 60 min95% abatement for 10 mg L−1 drug, 200 mg L−1 H2O2, 20 mg L−1 catalyst, pH = 2.0, and 26 °C. Ea = 36.3 kJ mol−1. Moderate reusability, losing 20% degradation after 4 consecutive cycles[26]
Antibiotics
CarbamazepineFigure 1b, H2O2. ceramic membrane/FeOCl catalyst, 1.6 mW cm−2 UVC10 μM drug in fresh synthetic urine (pH = 6) and hydrolyzed urine (pH = 9), 8 mM H2O2, 0.2 cm of membrane, room temperature, liquid flow rate = 2 mL min−1Total removal after 360 min in both matrices. OH as oxidant[27]
ImidaclopridStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2. ZVI catalyst, sunlight2 L of 1 mg L−1 drug in natural water, 3 mM H2O2, 55.8 mg L−1 catalyst, pH = 7.4, room temperature, 180 min86% degradation with k1 = 0.0110 min−1[28]
SulfamethazineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2. perylene diimide/Fe catalyst, 100 W halogen lamp200 mL of 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 5–10 mM H2O2, 0.1–1 mg L−1 catalyst, pH = 3.0–7.0, 25 °C, 120 minOptimization by response surface methodology = 92% abatement for 6.46 mM H2O2, 0.45 mg L−1 catalyst, and pH = 3.0. 1.344 mg L−1 Fe leached. OH as oxidant detected by specific scavengers[29]
Mixture of drugs
Acetaminophen, Caffeine, Diethyltoluamide,
Triclosan
Stirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, ZVI catalyst, 11 W UVC500 mL of 2 μg L−1 of each drug in natural water, 0.2 mM H2O2, 0.4 mM catalyst, pH = 3.0, 25 °C, 30 minRemoval at pH = 3.0 = 98% for acetaminophen >86% for triclosan >70% for diethyltoluamide, and >65% for caffeine. 19% TOC reduction[30]
Heterogeneous PF-like
TetracyclineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, MgO/5% Cu catalyst, 350 W Xe100 mL of 25 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 60 mM H2O2, 500 mg L−1 catalyst, natural pH, 25 °C, 125 minTotal removal in 5 min. Release of 40.7 mg L−1 of Mg2+, Detection of oxidants OH and O2●− by specific scavengers, Identification of 16 by-products by LC-MS[31]
CaffeineStirred-tank photoreactor, peracetic acid, MnFe2O4 catalyst, 4 W VUV lamp (λ = 185 nm)0.5 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 2 mM peracetic acid, 250 mg L−1 catalyst, pH = 7.0, 25 °C, 20 min88% abatement with k1 = 0.243 min−1 in 8 min. Detection of oxidants OH and CH3CO3 by specific scavengers and EPR. 7 by-products identified by LC-MS. Moderate reusability with a loss of 10% degradation after 5 successive runs[32]
Table 2. Relevant results reported for hybrid photocatalysis/photo-Fenton (PC/PF) and sono-photo-Fenton (SPF) treatments of pharmaceuticals in waters.
Table 2. Relevant results reported for hybrid photocatalysis/photo-Fenton (PC/PF) and sono-photo-Fenton (SPF) treatments of pharmaceuticals in waters.
PollutantSystemExperimental RemarksBest ResultsRef.
PC/PF
NSAIDs
AcetaminophenStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, MIL-53(Fe) photocatalyst, 300 W Xe (λ > 400 nm)100 mL of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 3–10 mM H2O2, 100 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 7.0. 25 °C, 60 min96% removal with k1 = 0.085 min−1 for 7 mM H2O2. Leaching of 1.3 mg L−1 Fe, and detection of OH and O2●− as oxidants by specific scavengers and EPR; 8 by-products identified by GC-MS. Good reusability, losing 4% degradation after four consecutive cycles[79]
AcetaminophenStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, CuS/MIL-101(Fe) photocatalyst, 300 W Xe100 mL of 5 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 10 mM H2O2, 100 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 3.0–11.0. 25 °C, 30 minComplete abatement with k1 = 0.2099 min−1 at pH = 5.0. OH, O2●−, and 1O2 as oxidants detected by specific scavengers and EPR, with seven by-products identified by LC-MS. Moderate reusability with a loss of 10% degradation after five successive runs[80]
AcetaminophenStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe-BiOBr photocatalyst, sunlight100 mL of 15 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 10 mM H2O2, 250 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 3.0, room temperature, 240 minOverall degradation and 58% TOC removal. OH and O2●− as oxidants detected by specific scavengers[81]
PhenazopyridineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, g-C3N4/MIL-101(Fe) membrane photocatalyst, 100 W Vis-LED60 mL of 15 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 60 μM concentrated H2O2, 250 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 6.5, room temperature, 70 min97% removal. Detection of OH and O2●− as oxidants detected by specific scavengers. Identification of 10 by-products by LC-MS. Good reusability with a loss of 8% degradation after five successive steps[82]
Antibiotics
NorfloxacinStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Fe2O3/Pt/TiO2 photocatalyst, 300 W fluorescent lamp20 mL of 4 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 50 mM H2O2, 50 mM Na2SO4, 1 cm−2 photocatalyst, pH = 6.7, 25 °C, 30 min of previous dark, 120 min88% removal. OH and O2●− as oxidants. Moderate reusability, losing 10% degradation after five successive steps[83]
CiprofloxacinStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, MIL-100(Fe) photocatalyst, 300 W Xe (λ > 420 nm)50 mL of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 4 mg L−1 H2O2, 100 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 6.4, 25 °C, 30 min of previous dark, 120 min94% degradation and 68% TOC reduction. OH as the main oxidant detected by specific scavengers and EPR. Moderate reusability with a loss of 10% degradation after five consecutive cycles[84]
SulfadimethoxineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, MIL-53(Fe) photocatalyst, 300 W Xe (λ > 400 nm)30 mL of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 20 μL concentrated H2O2, 165 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 7.0, 25 °C, 60 min of previous dark, 50 minComplete abatement. OH, O2●−, 1O2, and holes detected as oxidants by specific scavengers and EPR. Identification of 7 by-products by LC-QTOF-MS. Moderate reusability, losing 10% degradation after 4 consecutive runs[85]
SulfamethylthiazoleStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, MIL-100(Fe) photocatalyst, 300 W Xe20 mL of 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 38.8 mM H2O2, 5 g L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 6.8, 25 °C, 100 min98% decay with k1 = 0.0315 min−1. OH, O2●−, and 1O2 detected as oxidants by EPR. Identification of 14 by-products by LC-MS. Good reusability with a loss of 8% degradation after three successive runs[86]
CiprofloxacinStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, g-C3N4/MXene/CuO photocatalyst, 400 W sodium lamp (λ > 400 nm)100 mL of 5–30 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 10–40 μL concentrated H2O2, 5–30 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 3.0–11.0, room temperature, 90 min87% abatement with k1 = 0.0178 min−1 for 10 mg L−1 drug. 20 μL concentrated H2O2, 10 mg L−1 photocatalyst, and pH = 9.0. OH, O2●−, and mainly holes detected as oxidants by specific scavengers. Good reusability, losing 7% degradation after four successive cycles[87]
SulfadimethoxineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, g-C3N4/Cu photocatalyst, 300 W Xe20 mL of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 1.65 mM H2O2, 1 g L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 10.0, room temperature, 50 minOverall decay. OH, O2●−, and 1O2 detected as oxidants by specific scavengers and EPR[88]
TetracyclineMulti-test tube photoreactor, H2O2, g-C3N4/Fe3O4 photocatalyst, 500 W Xe (λ < 420 nm)50 mL of 25 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 5 mM H2O2, 1 g L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 3.0, 18 °C, 100 minTotal degradation with k1 = 0.03907 min−1 and 67% TOC reduction. OH and O2●− as oxidants detected by specific scavengers and EPR. Eight by-products identified by LC-MS. Good reusability, losing 9% degradation after five successive runs[89]
TetracyclineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, g-C3N4/CuO photocatalyst, 400 W Na lamp (λ > 400 nm)100 mL of 5–40 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 0.1–0.4 mL L−1 H2O2, 25–300 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 3.0–11.0, room temperature, 15 min of previous dark, 15 minComplete abatement with k1 = 0.1242 min−1 for 10 mg L−1 drug, 0.3 mL L−1 H2O2, 200 mg L−1 photocatalyst, and pH = 9.0. Detection of oxidants OH, O2●−, and holes by specific scavengers, and 11 by-products identified by LC-MS. Excellent reusability after four successive cycles[90]
TetracyclineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, g-C3N4/FeMoO4 photocatalyst, 500 W Xe (λ > 420 nm)100 mL of 31.2 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 1.31 mM H2O2, 1.24 g L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 7.0, 25 °C, 60 min of previous dark, 120 min98% degradation determined by response surface technology. Detection of oxidants OH, O2●−, and 1O2 by specific scavengers and EPR. Identification of 10 by-products by LC-MS. Moderate reusability with a loss of 10% degradation after 11 successive runs[91]
CarbamazepineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, BiVO4/FeOx photocatalyst, 300 W Xe (λ > 420 nm)40 mL of 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 0.6 mM H2O, 500 mg L−1 photocatalyst, natural pH, room temperature, 20 minTotal abatement with k1 = 0.317 min−1. OH, O2●−, and holes detected as oxidants by specific scavengers and EPR. Moderate reusability with a loss of 15% degradation after three successive runs[92]
LevofloxacinStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Cu0/CuFe2O4 photocatalyst, 300 W Xe (λ > 420 nm)50 mL of 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 2–150 mM H2O2, 50–600 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 3.0–11.0, room temperature, 90 min92% abatement with k1 = 0.033 min−1 for 10 mg L−1 drug. 30 mM H2O2, 200 mg L−1 photocatalyst, and pH = 6.7. OH, O2●−, electrons, and holes detected as oxidants by specific scavengers and EPR. 10 intermediates identified by LC-MS. Excellent reusability after four consecutive cycles[93]
TetracyclineStirred-tank photoreactor, FeWO4/WO3/FeOOH photocatalyst, oxalic acid, 100 W LED (λ = 420 nm)50 mL of 50 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 1 mM oxalic acid, 400 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 3.0, 25 °C, 30 minTotal drug removal with k1 = 0.117 min−1 and 72% oxalic acid decay. OH, O2●−, 1O2, and holes as oxidants detected by specific scavengers and EPR. 17 by-products identified by LC-MS. Excellent reusability after six successive runs[94]
ChloramphenicolStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Zn1-x-yCoxNiyO nanorods photocatalyst, 500 W halogen lamp20 mL of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 0.1 mL concentrated H2O2, 50 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 7.0, room temperature, 450 min88% removal. OH and holes detected as oxidants by specific scavengers. GC-MS analysis revealed the formation of four by-products. Excellent reusability after six successive runs[95]
TetracyclineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, Ce-LaCoO3 photocatalyst, 500 W Xe100 mL of 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 100 mM H2O2, 400 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 7.0, room temperature, 120 min92% decay. OH, O2●−, and holes as oxidants detected by specific scavengers and EPR. 13 by-products identified by LC-MS. Excellent reusability after five consecutive steps[96]
Mixture of drugs
Acetaminophen, Ciprofloxacin, Ibuprofen Stirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, SBA-15/Fe photocatalyst, 400 W Xe (λ > 390 nm)450 mL of 20 mg L−1 of all drugs in pure water, 1 mM H2O2, 330 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 7.0, room temperature, 30 minDegradation = 95% for ciprofloxacin, and >86% for ibuprofen and acetaminophen. Respective k1-values = 0.0633, 0.0431, and 0.0194 min−1. Detection of oxidants OH and O2●− by specific scavengers. Excellent reusability after five consecutive runs[97]
Carbamazepine, Diclofenac, Mecoprop, Sulfamethoxazole Stirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2. rGO/FeS2 photocatalyst, 300 W Xe50 mL of 10 μg L−1 of each drug in pure water, 1 mM H2O2, 250 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 7.4, room temperature, 10 minTotal degradation of all drugs. OH, O2●−, 1O2, electrons, and holes identified as oxidants by EPR[98]
Acetaminophen, Atenolol, Levofloxacin, Sulfamethoxazole Stirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, g-C3N4/Fe photocatalyst, 300 W Xe (λ > 400 nm)50 mL of 10 mg L−1 of each drug, except 5 mg L−1 sulfamethoxazole, in pure water, 50 mM H2O2, 1 g L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 7.46, room temperature, 60 min of previous dark, 60 minDegradation = 100% at 20 min for levofloxacin, >92% for atenolol, >74% for sulfamethoxazole, and >63% for acetaminophen. Total TOC decay at 12 h. Detection of oxidants OH, O2●−, 1O2, and holes by specific scavengers and EPR[99]
Chlortetracycline, Tetracycline, OxytetracyclineStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, MOF-Cu photocatalyst, 300 W Xe (λ > 420 nm)100 mL of 50 mg L−1 of each drug in pure water, 40 mM H2O2, 500 mg L−1 photocatalyst, natural pH, room temperature, 30 min of previous dark, 120 minDegradation = 84% for chlortetracycline, >82% for oxytetracycline, and >79% for tetracycline. OH, O2●−, and holes identified as oxidants by specific scavengers. Good reusability, losing up to 8% degradation after five consecutive runs[100]
Real wastewaters
WWTP effluentStirred-tank photoreactor, H2O2, MOF-100(Fe) photocatalyst, 300 W Xe (λ > 420 nm)40 mL of 24 pharmaceuticals at μg L−1 in WWTP effluent (TOC0 = 7.9 mg C L−1), 20 mM H2O2, 100 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 7.2, 25 °C, 10 hComplete removal of all drugs. Leaching of 0.3 mg L−1 Fe. Oxidants OH, O2●−, and 1O2 detected by specific scavengers and EPR[101]
SPF
NSAIDs
IbuprofenStirred-tank photoreactor/sono-reactor, H2O2, Fe2+, 6 W UVC or 150 W Xe, 20 kHz USCirculation at 150 mL min−1 between 500 mL in PF and 1 L in US, 1.5 L of 20 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 1.6–22.4 mM H2O2, 0.134 mM Fe2+, pH = 2.6, 25 °C, 180 minOverall degradation with k1 = 0.0130 min−1 in 60 min and 60% TOC decay in 180 min for 6.4 mM H2O2 and 150 W Xe. Detection of 12 by-products by LC-MS[102]
Antibiotics
OxytetracyclineFigure 18a, H2O2, Fe2+ or ZVI catalyst, UVA, UVB, or UVC, 40 kHz US10 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 60 mg L−1 H2O2, 8 mg L−1 Fe2+ or ZVI, pH = 4.0, room temperature, 60 minDegradation with Fe2+ or ZVI = 86% or 87% for UVA, 90% or 89% for UVB, and 85% or 93% for UVC. 11 transformation products identified by GC-MS[103]
DexamethasoneContinuous-flow sono-photoreactor of Figure 19a, H2O2, zeolite/Fe catalyst, 5 W UVA (λ = 380–400 nm), 140 kHz US1.2–9.7 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 9.8–35.1 mg L−1 H2O2, packed catalyst, pH = 7.0, 20 °C, hydraulic retention time = 39.5–140 minOptimization by response surface methodology = 99% removal and 74% COD reduction for 5.5 mg L−1 drug, 22.5 mg L−1 H2O2, and hydraulic retention time = 140 min[104]
Other drugs
MetoprololStirred-tank sono-photoreactor, H2O2, MWCNTs a/Cr2O3-Sm photocatalyst, 350 W Xe, 20 kHz US110 mL of 10 mg L−1 drug in pure water, 50 mM H2O2, 300 mg L−1 photocatalyst, pH = 7.0, 25 °C, 60 minComplete degradation and 95% TOC removal. Detection of oxidants OH, O2●−, 1O2, and holes by specific scavengers and EPR. Three by-products identified by GC-MS[105]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brillas, E.; Peralta-Hernández, J.M. Advances in Hybrid Photo-Fenton Processes for Treating Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Water and Wastewater Systems. Water 2026, 18, 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18080920

AMA Style

Brillas E, Peralta-Hernández JM. Advances in Hybrid Photo-Fenton Processes for Treating Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Water and Wastewater Systems. Water. 2026; 18(8):920. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18080920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brillas, Enric, and Juan M. Peralta-Hernández. 2026. "Advances in Hybrid Photo-Fenton Processes for Treating Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Water and Wastewater Systems" Water 18, no. 8: 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18080920

APA Style

Brillas, E., & Peralta-Hernández, J. M. (2026). Advances in Hybrid Photo-Fenton Processes for Treating Pharmaceutical Contaminants in Water and Wastewater Systems. Water, 18(8), 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18080920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop