Early Identification of Rainfall-Induced Landslides in Rural Cut-Slope Construction Under Extreme Rainfall: A Case Study of Fujian Province, China
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Study Area Setting
2.1. Geological Environment
2.2. Data Sources and Automated Extraction
3. Hazard Assessment Using the CIM
3.1. Principles of the Comprehensive Index Method
3.2. Indexing of Hazard Factors
3.3. Hazard Classification
- For soil slopes, if the following conditions are simultaneously met: H < 5 m, cut-slope gradient > 65°, natural slope gradient > 35°, and slope-wall distance ≤ 2 m, they can be directly classified as medium risk.
- For rock slopes, when conditions such as dip direction parallel to the slope surface (including apparent dip, bedding plane, or overhanging conditions), mud-filled joints with an aperture > 3 mm, H < 5 m, and slope-wall distance ≤ 2 m are met, they can be directly classified as medium risk.
- For both rock and soil slopes, if D > 2H/3 and the above conditions are not satisfied, they can be directly classified as low risk.
- For all other scenarios, the risk level shall be determined according to the following table:
4. Spatial Distribution of Geological Hazards
4.1. Spatial Distribution by Hazard Level
4.2. Structural Parameters of Hazardous Slopes
5. Field Validation and Analysis of Results
5.1. Validation of Disaster Events Triggered by Super Typhoon Gaemi (2024) [29]
5.2. Verification of 9 June Disaster Events in Wuping-Shanghang (2024)
5.3. Analysis of Validation Results
6. Discussion
6.1. Spatial Heterogeneity and the Coupling Mechanism of Geological and Human Activities
6.2. Structural Parameter Characteristics of Hazard Sites and Geomechanical Mechanisms
6.3. Methodological Innovation and Application Limitations of the Early Identification Technical System
6.4. Implications Under Climate Change Scenarios
7. Conclusions
- (1)
- Geohazards in the region exhibit a distinct “high density inland and low density along the coast” pattern. High-risk sites cluster in the northwestern, central, and western mountains, a distribution attributed to steep terrain, clayey soils, and widespread slope-cutting activities.
- (2)
- High-risk cut slopes are characterized by a distinctive set of structural parameters: very short slope-wall distance (≤1 m), steep cut-slope gradient (55° to 75°), and moderate cut-slope height (5 m to 8 m). This combination constitutes a failure-prone geotechnical setting that is highly susceptible to rainfall triggering.
- (3)
- Validation based on two heavy rainfall events in 2024 shows identification match rates of 91.8% and 79.98%, with Kappa coefficients of 0.85 and 0.72, respectively. This confirms the method’s good reliability and regional applicability for rainfall-induced landslides and risk prevention under climate change.
- (4)
- The study finds that high-risk cut slopes cluster inland, revealing a synergy between human activity and geology. The proposed framework offers a scalable tool for regional risk screening, prevention, and climate adaptation, with potential for integration into dynamic early warning systems.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhang, W.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Samui, P.; Chwała, M.; He, Y. Landslide Susceptibility Research Combining Qualitative Analysis and Quantitative Evaluation: A Case Study of Yunyang County in Chongqing, China. Forests 2022, 13, 1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, W.; Wang, G.; Yang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Gao, Y.; Chen, X.; Xu, S.; Han, L.; Yang, X. Risk Assessment and Control of Geological Hazards in Towns of Complex Mountainous Areas Based on Remote Sensing and Geological Survey. Water 2023, 15, 3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, K.; Bai, F.; Wang, T.; Su, Y.; Wang, B. Geological disaster risk assessment based on remote sensing, GIS, and a multi-strategy improved GWO-optimized Elman neural network. Int. J. Digit. Earth 2025, 18, 2496793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.; Chen, W.; Qi, X.; Hou, H. Risk assessment and its influencing factors analysis of geological hazards in typical mountain environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 309, 127077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, C.; Liu, Y.; Lan, H.; Li, L.; Liu, S.; Yan, Z.; Li, Y. Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics, causes, and prevention advice of fatal geohazards in Jiangxi Province, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 834, 155337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silva-Fragoso, A.; Norini, G.; Nappi, R.; Groppelli, G.; Michetti, A.M. Improving the Accuracy of Digital Terrain Models Using Drone-Based LiDAR for the Morpho-Structural Analysis of Active Calderas: The Case of Ischia Island, Italy. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, J.; Li, Q.; Zhang, J.; Luo, P.; Zhu, W. Risk Assessment of Geological Landslide Hazards Using D-InSAR and Remote Sensing. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, H.; Sheng, L.; Dai, Y.; Li, X.; Rui, Y.; Lu, L. 3D geological modeling of tunnel alignment in the complex mountainous region of Yongshan, China, based on multisource data fusion. Eng. Geol. 2025, 354, 108209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Hu, D.; Sun, Q.; Zhu, L.; Liu, Y. A Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Method Based on GIS Technology and an AHP-Weighted Information Content Method: A Case Study of Southern Anhui, China. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cetin, M.; Aksoy, T.; Bilge Ozturk, G.; Cabuk, A. Developing a Model for the Relationship Between Vegetation and Wind Power Using Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems Technology. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2022, 233, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, D.; Liu, X. Comparison of machine-learning models for predicting short-term building heating load using operational parameters. Energy Build. 2021, 253, 111505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Xiang, J.; Zhuo, G.; Zhang, H.; Dai, K.; Shi, X. Dynamic Landslide Susceptibility Assessment in the Yalong River Alpine Gorge Region Integrating InSAR-Derived Deformation Velocity. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.A.A.; Zhou, P.; Walasai, G.D.; Mohsin, M. Energy security and environmental sustainability index of South Asian countries: A composite index approach. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 106, 105507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Gan, Y.; Shi, C.; Huo, A.; Pei, Y.; Song, Y.; Wang, X.; Ahmed, A. A Critical Analysis of Geological Hazard Risk Assessment Including Future Perspectives. Sustainability 2024, 16, 3701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crozier, M.J. Deciphering the effect of climate change on landslide activity: A review. Geomorphology 2010, 124, 260–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, W.; Bai, H.; Lan, B.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Z.; Yan, L.; Ma, X. Spatial–temporal distribution and failure mechanism of group-occurring landslides in Mibei village, Longchuan County, Guangdong, China. Landslides 2022, 19, 1957–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, S.; Feng, W.; Yi, X.; Liu, K.; Guo, C.; Tang, X.; Wu, Z. Clustered shallow landslides triggered by heavy rainfall in May 2022 in Wuping County, Fujian Province, China. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2025, 84, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, Y.; Lu, Y. Heterogeneous Ensemble Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Method Considering Spatial Heterogeneity. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Huang, F.; Chen, X.; Hu, H.; Gu, H.; Hu, W.; Zhou, X. Regional landslide susceptibility prediction considering the optimal discretization of environmental factors. Geocarto Int. 2025, 40, 2543487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neelawela, U.D.; Selvanathan, E.A.; Wagner, L.D. Global measure of electricity security: A composite index approach. Energy Econ. 2019, 81, 433–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molinos-Senante, M. Comparative energy efficiency of wastewater treatment technologies: A synthetic index approach. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2018, 20, 1819–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, A.; Taylor, B.N. Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI); NIST Special Publication 2008 Edition; NIST Research Library: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, X.-y.; Zhang, L.-f.; Yang, Z.; Li, P.; Li, T.-l. Inversion analysis of the shear strength parameters for a high loess slope in the limit state. J. Mt. Sci. 2021, 18, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Shi, W.; Wang, Y.; Liang, F.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X. Numerical evaluation of the deformation and failure mechanisms and movement processes of the Guanling landslide in Guizhou, China. Landslides 2023, 20, 1747–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 50218-2014; Standard for Engineering Classification of Rock Mass. Standardization Administration of China: Beijing, China, 2014.
- Benham, E. Writing with the SI. Weight. Meas. Connect. 2021, 11, J-032. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.; Huang, A.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, B.; Fang, D.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Y. Diurnal cycle of precipitation over Fujian Province during the pre-summer rainy season in southern China. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2017, 130, 993–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu, C.; Yu, X.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, D.; Mao, X.; Zhu, J. The Formation Mechanism of Surface Landslide Disasters in the Mining Area under Different Slope Angles. Adv. Civ. Eng. 2021, 2021, 6697790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, H.; Wang, F.; Fu, Z.; Feng, Y.; You, Q.; Li, S. Characterizing the clustered landslides triggered by extreme rainfall during the 2024 typhoon Gaemi in Zixing City, Hunan Province, China. Landslides 2025, 22, 2311–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.-Y.; Jiang, S.-Y. Detrital zircons in metasedimentary rocks of Mayuan and Mamianshan Group from Cathaysia Block in northwestern Fujian Province, South China: New constraints on their formation ages and paleogeographic implication. Precambrian Res. 2019, 320, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, N.; Shen, H. Progressive deformation and failure mechanism of loess fill slopes induce by rainfall: Insights from flume model tests. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2023, 82, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, T.; Hu, X.; Guo, L.; Su, F.; Tu, W.; Hu, Z.; Liu, H.; Yang, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; et al. Digital mapping of zinc in urban topsoil using multisource geospatial data and random forest. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 792, 148455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Wang, Y. Quantifying impacts of precipitation scenarios projected under climate change on annual probability of rainfall-induced landslides at a specific slope. Comput. Geotech. 2024, 167, 106063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Yang, G.; Li, W.; Chen, X.; Liu, F.; Zheng, Y. Numerical Simulation Study of Rainfall-Induced Saturated–Unsaturated Landslide Instability and Failure. Water 2025, 17, 2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Y.; Yang, H.; Peng, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, B.; Shi, M. A Novel Near-Real-Time GB-InSAR Slope Deformation Monitoring Method. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Ma, X.; Li, Q.; Chang, M.; Huang, S.; Lu, L. The deformation characteristics analyses of reactivate water-rich landslide based on DS-InSAR monitoring technology. Nat. Hazards 2025, 121, 20129–20146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Dataset | Time Period | Source | Application |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rural building cadastral survey polygons | 2021 | Natural Resources Real Right Registration Office, Department of Natural Resources of Fujian Province | Acquisition of building location, shape, and dimensions |
| 1:10,000 Digital Line Graphs (DLG) | 2014 | Fujian Surveying and Mapping Institute | Acquisition of building location, shape, and dimensions |
| 1:10,000 Digital Elevation Model (DEM) | 2014 | Fujian Surveying and Mapping Institute | Derivation of surface morphology (e.g., cut-slope gradient, height difference) |
| High-resolution remote sensing imagery | 2022 | Fujian Geologic Surveying and Mapping Institute | Secondary verification |
| Soil Slope | Rock Slope | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | Evaluation Factors | Weight | State Classification | Scoring | Evaluation Factors | Weight | State Classification | Scoring |
| 1 | slope-wall distance | 0.1 | 2 m < D | 1 | slope-wall distance | 0.1 | 2 m < D | 1 |
| 1 m < D ≤ 2 m | 3 | 1 m < D ≤ 2 m | 3 | |||||
| D ≤ 1 m | 5 | D ≤ 1 m | 5 | |||||
| 2 | cut-slope gradient | 0.15 | a ≤ 55° | 1 | cut-slope gradient | 0.1 | a ≤ 55° | 1 |
| 55° < a ≤ 65° | 2 | 55° < a ≤ 65° | 2 | |||||
| 65° < a ≤ 75° | 3 | 65° < a ≤ 75° | 3 | |||||
| > 75° | 5 | > 75° | 5 | |||||
| 3 | cut-slope height | 0.25 | 5 m ≤ H < 8 m | 1 | cut-slope height | 0.2 | 5 m ≤ H < 8 m | 1 |
| 8 m ≤ H < 12 m | 3 | 8 m ≤ H < 15 m | 3 | |||||
| H ≥ 12 m | 5 | 15 m ≤ H | 5 | |||||
| 4 | natural slope gradient | 0.25 | b < 8° | 1 | rock hardness degree | 0.1 | Hard rock | 1 |
| 8° ≤ b ≤ 25° | 2 | Moderately hard rock | 2 | |||||
| 25° < b ≤ 35° | 3 | Moderately soft rock | 4 | |||||
| 35° < b ≤ 45° | 5 | Soft rock | 5 | |||||
| > 45° | 2 | |||||||
| 5 | soil layer thickness | 0.15 | h < 2 | 1 | Structural plane conditions (strength characteristics) | 0.2 | Undulating rough, aperture < 3 mm, cemented | 1 |
| 2 ≤ h ≤ 3 | 3 | |||||||
| 3 < h ≤ 6 | 4 | Planar smooth, aperture < 3 mm, non-cemented | 3 | |||||
| h > 6 | 5 | Argillaceous fill, aperture > 3 mm | 5 | |||||
| 6 | soil type | 0.05 | Gravel Soil | 1 | Bedrock Strata Dip Direction and Topographic Slope Aspect Combination (Geometric Characteristic) | 0.25 | Blocky structure slope | 1 |
| Clay Soil | 3 | Adverse dip slope, Subhorizontal bedded slope | 2 | |||||
| Fill Mass | 5 | Oblique slope, transverse slope | 3 | |||||
| 7 | cut-slope age | 0.05 | t > 50 | 1 | cut-slope age | 0.05 | t > 50 | 1 |
| 20 < t ≤ 50 | 2 | 20 < t ≤ 50 | 2 | |||||
| 10 < t ≤ 20 | 3 | 10 < t ≤ 20 | 3 | |||||
| 5 < t ≤ 10 | 4 | t ≤ 10 | 5 | |||||
| t ≤ 5 | 5 | |||||||
| Comprehensive Index (F) | <2.8 | 2.8 ≤ F < 3.5 | 3.5 ≤ F < 4.0 | F ≥ 4.0 |
| Risk Level | Low | Medium | High | Very High |
| City (District) | City Sites | Assessment Grade | Proportion Equal to or Greater than MEDIUM Risk (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very High (Site) | High (Site) | Medium (Site) | Low (Site) | |||
| Fuzhou City | 11,242 | 6 | 101 | 1376 | 9710 | 13.25 |
| Longyan City | 23,726 | 14 | 421 | 10,532 | 12,641 | 46.45 |
| Nanping City | 8568 | 7 | 178 | 2205 | 6178 | 27.89 |
| Ningde City | 15,818 | 3 | 187 | 2654 | 12,974 | 17.98 |
| Pingtan Comprehensive Experimental Zone | 369 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 290 | 20.55 |
| Putian City | 2411 | 0 | 40 | 234 | 2128 | 11.41 |
| Quanzhou City | 39,541 | 19 | 576 | 4210 | 34,654 | 12.18 |
| Sanming City | 35,154 | 18 | 742 | 5923 | 282,78 | 19.12 |
| Zhangzhou City | 6808 | 3 | 57 | 655 | 6093 | 10.50 |
| Xiamen City | 452 | 0 | 14 | 202 | 236 | 47.79 |
| Total | 144,089 | 70 | 2316 | 28,066 | 113,182 | 21.20 |
| County (City) | Hazard Type | Houses Damaged (Unit) | Population at Risk | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dehua County | Rear Mountain Slope Collapse | 4 | 6 | All mentioned sites were located within identified hazard zones, and no casualties occurred due to timely warnings. Furthermore, among the 49 hazard incidents recorded during this typhoon event, 45 (91.8%) had been previously identified as potential hazard sites in this study. |
| 1 | 0 | |||
| Side Earth Slide | 1 | 2 | ||
| Slope Failure Behind House | 1 | 12 | ||
| Sanyuan District | Collapse Behind The House | 1 | 4 | |
| Yunxiao County | 1 | 4 | ||
| 2 | 8 | |||
| High-steep Slope Collapse | 1 | 6 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Tang, X.; Liu, K.; Feng, W.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Weng, J.; Huang, W. Early Identification of Rainfall-Induced Landslides in Rural Cut-Slope Construction Under Extreme Rainfall: A Case Study of Fujian Province, China. Water 2026, 18, 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18040460
Tang X, Liu K, Feng W, Yang Y, Zhang Y, Weng J, Huang W. Early Identification of Rainfall-Induced Landslides in Rural Cut-Slope Construction Under Extreme Rainfall: A Case Study of Fujian Province, China. Water. 2026; 18(4):460. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18040460
Chicago/Turabian StyleTang, Xuefeng, Kan Liu, Wenkai Feng, Yixin Yang, Yuping Zhang, Junze Weng, and Wei Huang. 2026. "Early Identification of Rainfall-Induced Landslides in Rural Cut-Slope Construction Under Extreme Rainfall: A Case Study of Fujian Province, China" Water 18, no. 4: 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18040460
APA StyleTang, X., Liu, K., Feng, W., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Weng, J., & Huang, W. (2026). Early Identification of Rainfall-Induced Landslides in Rural Cut-Slope Construction Under Extreme Rainfall: A Case Study of Fujian Province, China. Water, 18(4), 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/w18040460
