Analysis of the Spawning Response Characteristics of Four Major Chinese Carps to Eco-Hydrological Processes in the Three Gorges Reservoir
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Research Area and Methods
2.1. Overview of the Study Area
2.2. Ecological Operation Implementation Process
2.3. Sampling Method and Data Statistics
2.4. Selection of Eco-Hydrological Indicators
2.5. Selection of Correlation Analysis Methods
3. Results Analysis
3.1. Interannual Variation in Spawning of the Four Major Chinese Carps
3.2. Impact of Hydrological Processes on Spawning Scale
3.3. Effects of Eco-Hydrological Characteristics During Flooding on Spawning of Four Major Chinese Carps
3.3.1. Analysis of the Response Relationship Between Spawning Behavior and Eco-Hydrological Indicators During Flooding
3.3.2. Identification of Key Eco-Hydrological Indicators Affecting Spawning of Four Major Chinese Carps
3.4. Impact of Ecological Operation of the Three Gorges Reservoir on the Spawning of Four Major Chinese Carps
3.4.1. Stimulating Effect of Ecological Operation on Spawning of Four Major Chinese Carps
3.4.2. Response of Spawning of the Four Major Chinese Carps to Water Temperature
4. Discussion
4.1. Optimization Suggestions for Ecological Operation
4.2. Comparison of Domestic and International Studies on Fish Population Restoration Based on Eco-Hydrological Indicators
4.3. Limitations and Analysis of the Study
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- Since the Three Gorges Reservoir began operating normally, the three indicators of fish perceived daily flow increase (Pda), fish perceived cumulative flow increase (Pcu), and flow daily increase (Qav) have shown a significant positive correlation with the spawning scale of the four major Chinese carps; the initial flow rate (Qmin) has shown a significant negative correlation with the spawning scale of the four major Chinese carps; the total increase in flow rate (Qt) showed a weak correlation with the spawning scale of the four major Chinese carps; and the two indicators of rising water duration (Tdur) and peak flow rate (Qmax) lost their correlation with the spawning scale of the four major Chinese carps.
- (2)
- Currently, the key eco-hydrological indicators that can stimulate the spawning of the four major Chinese carps are the daily flow rate increase felt by fish, the cumulative flow rate increase felt by fish, and the daily flow growth. The indicator range thresholds that can effectively stimulate the spawning of the four major Chinese carps, with the spawning scale accounting for more than 20% of the annual spawning scale of the same year, are: fish perceived daily flow increase (Pda) 2.64–36.05%, the average is 11.52%; fish perceived cumulative flow increase (Pcu) 15.87–180.23%, the average is 64.6%; and flow daily increase (Qav) 500 m3/s–825 m3/s, the average value is 1491.35 m3/s. The most suitable water temperature for the reproduction of the four major Chinese carps is 21–23 °C.
- (3)
- Since the Three Gorges Reservoir has been operating normally, the four major Chinese carps have spawned most frequently and on the largest scale during rising water levels. However, there are still many ecological and hydrological indicators during rising water levels that do not fall within the above threshold range, which shows certain limitations. In order to further promote the reproduction and spawning of the four major Chinese carps and optimize the ecological scheduling effect in the future, it is recommended that the ecological scheduling period be carried out once in mid-June and once in early July or late June, completing two ecological operations a year, and the daily flow growth can be controlled within the range of 588–2000 m3/s.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Li, B.; Chen, N.; Wang, W.; Wang, C.; Schmitt, R.; Lin, A.; Daily, G.C. Eco-environmental impacts of dams in the Yangtze River Basin, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, C.; Yan, Q.; Li, W.; Yang, X.; Zhang, S. Impact of dam construction on the spawning grounds of the four major Chinese carps in the Three Gorges Reservoir. J. Hydrol. 2022, 609, 127694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, N.; Li, W.; Yu, Y.; Jia, J.; Ma, G.; Peng, S. Study on the Flow Velocity Preference of the Four Major Chinese Carps Using Convolutional Neural Networks. Fishes 2025, 10, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, L.; Lin, J.; Chen, D.; Duan, X.; Peng, Q.; Liu, S. Ecological flow assessment to improve the spawning habitat for the four major species of carp of the Yangtze River: A study on habitat suitability based on ultrasonic telemetry. Water 2018, 10, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, Z. Distribution characteristics of hydraulic habitat indicators for fish in typical compound channels in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2024, 54, e03113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Q.; Hu, P.; Wang, H.; Pan, J.; Yang, Z.; Liu, H. The influence of cascade hydropower development on the hydrodynamic conditions impacting the reproductive process of fish with semi-buoyant eggs. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 689, 865–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Singh, V.P.; Peng, S. Ecohydrological effects of water reservoirs with consideration of asynchronous and synchronous concurrences of high-and low-flow regimes. Hydrol. Sci. J. 2018, 63, 615–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, W.; Chen, X.; Tao, J.; Jun, C. The practice and effectiveness of ecological operation experiment on spawning of the four major Chinese carps by Three Gorges Reservoir. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, Beijing, China, 16–18 October 2018; p. 01084. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, M.; Lin, J.; Peng, Q.; Yu, L.; Chen, D.; Liu, S.; Duan, X. Relationship between the distribution of broodstock and vorticity of spawning grounds of four major Chinese carps in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River during ecological operation of the Three Gorges Dam. Water 2018, 10, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuart, I.G.; Sharpe, C.P. Ecohydraulic model for designing environmental flows supports recovery of imperilled Murray cod (Maccullochella peelii) in the Lower Darling–Baaka River following catastrophic fish kills. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2021, 73, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter-Bundhoo, L.; Butler, G.L.; Bond, N.R.; Thiem, J.D.; Bunn, S.E.; Kennard, M.J. Fish movements in response to environmental flow releases in intermittent rivers. Freshw. Biol. 2023, 68, 260–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rytwinski, T.; Taylor, J.J.; Bennett, J.R.; Smokorowski, K.E.; Cooke, S.J. What are the impacts of flow regime changes on fish productivity in temperate regions? A systematic map protocol. Environ. Evid. 2017, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, D.; Xu, W.; Wu, F.; Lin, J.; Hou, Y.; Zhu, B.; Peng, Q.; Jin, T. Effects of Ecological Operation of Three Gorges Reservoir on Fish Species with Drifting Eggs. J. Hydroecol. 2024, 45, 58–66. [Google Scholar]
- King, A.J.; Gwinn, D.C.; Tonkin, Z.; Mahoney, J.; Raymond, S.; Beesley, L. Using abiotic drivers of fish spawning to inform environmental flow management. J. Appl. Ecol. 2016, 53, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, W.-X.; Wang, H.-X.; Xu, J.-X.; Xia, Z.-Q. Ecological operation for three gorges reservoir. Water Sci. Eng. 2011, 4, 143–156. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, L.; Opperman, J.J.; Tickner, D.; Speed, R.; Guo, Q.; Chen, D. Managing the Three Gorges Dam to implement environmental flows in the Yangtze River. Front. Environ. Sci. 2018, 6, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, G.; Wu, L.; Li, H.; Liu, M.; Cheng, F.; Murphy, B.R.; Xie, S. Preliminary evidence of delayed spawning and suppressed larval growth and condition of the major carps in the Yangtze River below the Three Gorges Dam. Environ. Biol. Fishes 2012, 93, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sammons, S.M.; Dorsey, L.G.; Bettoli, P.W.; Fiss, F.C. Effects of reservoir hydrology on reproduction by largemouth bass and spotted bass in Normandy Reservoir, Tennessee. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 1999, 19, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagayama, S.; Fujii, R.; Harada, M.; Sueyoshi, M. Low water temperature and increased discharge trigger downstream spawning migration of ayu Plecoglossus altivelis. Fish. Sci. 2023, 89, 463–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Zhu, S.; Li, Y.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Li, J. Spatiotemporal Response of Fish Aggregations to Hydrological Changes in the Lower Pearl River, China, during the Main Spawning Season. Water 2022, 14, 1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, B.; Zhang, P.; Chen, L.; Chen, F.; Lv, Z.; Niu, J. Study on the change of spawning habitat suitability of four major Chinese carps in the lower reaches of the dam. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, Vienna, Austria, 23–28 April 2023; p. EGU-4103. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, J.; Yang, Z.; Cai, Y.; Wang, X.; Chang, J. Spatiotemporal response of pelagic fish aggregations in their spawning grounds of middle Yangtze to the flood process optimized by the Three Gorges Reservoir operation. Ecol. Eng. 2017, 103, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Y.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, J.; Du, S.; Zhou, T.; Fu, X.; Jiang, S. Identification and restoration of hydrological processes alteration during the fish spawning period. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 11307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Q.; Kynard, B.; Yang, D.; Chen, X.; Du, H.; Shen, L.; Zhang, H. Using drift nets to capture early life stages and monitor spawning of the Yangtze River Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2009, 25, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, B.; Yu, Z.; Liang, Z. Water Conservancy Project Construction and Fishery Ecology Research Collection: Gezhouba Water Control Project and Four Famous Fishes in Yangtze River; Hubei Science and Technology Press: Wuhan, China, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Šarauskienė, D.; Adžgauskas, G.; Kriaučiūnienė, J.; Jakimavičius, D. Analysis of hydrologic regime changes caused by small hydropower plants in lowland rivers. Water 2021, 13, 1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, T.P.; Hoang, S.T.; Bui, D.Q.; Ha, N.T.; Nguyen, L.H.; Nguyen, L.M.; Tran, C.K. Applying a Holistic Approach to Environmental Flow Assessment in the Yen River Basin. Water 2024, 16, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, B.; Huang, Q.; Wang, P.; Liu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, T.; Pozdniakov, S.P.; Frolova, N.L.; Yu, J. Long-Term Variability of the Hydrological Regime and Its Response to Climate Warming in the Zhizdra River Basin of the Eastern European Plain. Water 2023, 15, 2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Li, C.; Duan, X.; Chen, D.; Feng, S.; Luo, H.; Peng, Q.; Liao, W. Variation in the significant environmental factors affecting larval abundance of four major C hinese carp species: Fish spawning response to the Three Gorges Dam. Freshw. Biol. 2014, 59, 1343–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, H.; Zhang, S.; Tang, C.; Yang, X. Effect of dam construction on spawning activity of Yellow River carp (Cyprinus carpio) in the lower Yellow River. Front. Earth Sci. 2022, 10, 975433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drösler, J. An n-dimensional Weber law and the corresponding Fechner law. J. Math. Psychol. 2000, 44, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bee, M.A.; Vélez, A.; Forester, J.D. Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012, 131, 4188–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodwin, R.A.; Nestler, J.M.; Anderson, J.J.; Weber, L.J.; Loucks, D.P. Forecasting 3-D fish movement behavior using a Eulerian–Lagrangian–agent method (ELAM). Ecol. Model. 2006, 192, 197–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerr, J.R.; Kemp, P.S. Masking a fish’s detection of environmental stimuli: Application to improving downstream migration at river infrastructure. J. Fish Biol. 2019, 95, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Rhoads, B.L.; Wang, D. Assessment of the flow regime alterations in the middle reach of the Yangtze River associated with dam construction: Potential ecological implications. Hydrol. Process. 2016, 30, 3949–3966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Kang, M.; Wu, J.; Wang, C.; Li, J.; Du, H.; Yang, H.; Wei, Q. Increasing river temperature shifts impact the Yangtze ecosystem: Evidence from the endangered Chinese sturgeon. Animals 2019, 9, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffen, E.M.; Weber, M.J. Environmental Factors Associated With Fish Reproduction in Regulated Rivers. River Res. Appl. 2025, 41, 515–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Babita, M.; Kailasam, M.; Muralidhar, M.; Hussain, T.; Behera, A.; Jithendran, K. Effect of changing environmental factors on reproductive cycle and endocrinology of fishes. In Outlook of Climate Change and Fish Nutrition; Springer: Singapore, 2023; pp. 377–396. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Lin, J.; Liu, Y.; Yao, W.; Zhang, D.; Peng, Q.; Qian, S. Refined operation of cascade reservoirs considering fish ecological demand. J. Hydrol. 2022, 607, 127559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baruch, E.M.; Yarnell, S.M.; Grantham, T.E.; Ayers, J.R.; Rypel, A.L.; Lusardi, R.A. Mimicking functional elements of the natural flow regime promotes native fish recovery in a regulated river. Ecol. Appl. 2024, 34, e3013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Espinoza, T.; Burke, C.; Carpenter-Bundhoo, L.; Marshall, S.; McDougall, A.; Roberts, D.; Campbell, H.; Kennard, M. Quantifying movement of multiple threatened species to inform adaptive management of environmental flows. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 295, 113067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dattilo, J.; Brewer, S.K.; Shoup, D. Flow dynamics influence fish recruitment in hydrologically connected river–reservoir landscapes. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 2021, 41, 1752–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bates, E.; Appelbaum, M. Methods of studying small samples: Issues and examples. In Atypical Cognitive Deficits in Developmental Disorders; Psychology Press: London, UK, 2014; pp. 245–280. [Google Scholar]
- Shu, J.; Xu, Z.; Meng, D. Small sample learning in big data era. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1808.04572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bunn, S.E.; Arthington, A.H. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ. Manag. 2002, 30, 492–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crowder, D.W.; Diplas, P. Vorticity and circulation: Spatial metrics for evaluating flow complexity in stream habitats. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 59, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]






| Year | Frequency | Implementation Time (d) | Outflow (m3/s) | Duration of Water Rise (d) | Daily Flow Growth [m3/(s·d)] | Daily Water Level Increase (m/d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | first | 5.7–5.14 | 5700—15,300 | 8 | 1200 | 0.45 |
| 2014 | first | 6.4–6.6 | 11,800—18,400 | 3 | 2200 | 0.63 |
| 2015 | first | 6.7–6.10 | 7030—19,740 | 4 | 3178 | 1.30 |
| second | 6.25–7.2 | 15,740—31,380 | 8 | 1955 | 0.60 | |
| 2017 | first | 5.20–5.25 | 14,980—18,030 | 6 | 508 | 0.20 |
| second | 6.5–6.10 | 12,080—19,850 | 6 | 1295 | 0.48 | |
| 2018 | first | 5.19–5.25 | 16,900—25,310 | 7 | 1201 | 0.37 |
| second | 6.17–6.25 | 13,450—19,650 | 9 | 689 | 0.25 | |
| 2019 | first | 5.25–5.31 | 16,550—20,340 | 7 | 541 | 0.29 |
| 2020 | first | 5.23–5.28 | 8800—12,800 | 6 | 667 | 0.31 |
| 2022 | first | 6.3–6.8 | 15,100—21,500 | 6 | 1066 | 0.43 |
| second | 6.23–6.28 | 19,500—28,000 | 6 | 1416 | 0.47 | |
| 2023 | first | 5.28–6.3 | 8500—18,800 | 7 | 1471 | 0.58 |
| second | 7.2–7.6 | 10,700—19,000 | 5 | 1660 | 0.64 | |
| 2024 | first | 5.19–5.23 | 10,900—16,900 | 5 | 1200 | 0.36 |
| second | 6.16–6.21 | 11,800—20,100 | 6 | 1383 | 0.61 |
| Hydrological Indicators | Flood Pulse Initial Discharge | Peak Flow | Duration of Flood | Daily Flow Growth | Total Flow Growth | Fish Sense Daily Flow Increases | Fish Feel Cumulative Flow Increase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable name Unit | m3/s | m3/s | d | m3/s | m3/s | % | % |
| Year | Time Period (d) | Qmin (m3/s) | Qmax (m3/s) | Tdur (d) | Qt (m3/s) | Qav (m3/s) | Pda (%) | Pcu (%) | Proportion of Spawning Per Year (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 6.22–6.25 | 10,400 | 21,700 | 4 | 11,300 | 2825 | 27.16 | 108.65 | 50.00 |
| 2014 | 6.3–6.7 | 11,400 | 18,900 | 5 | 7500 | 1500 | 13.16 | 65.79 | 25.27 |
| 7.1–7.4 | 18,500 | 27,100 | 4 | 8600 | 2150 | 11.62 | 46.49 | 23.97 | |
| 2015 | 6.7–6.11 | 7030 | 19,700 | 5 | 12,670 | 2534 | 36.05 | 180.23 | 39.98 |
| 6.22–6.27 | 16,200 | 26,850 | 6 | 10,650 | 1775 | 10.96 | 65.74 | 25.56 | |
| 2017 | 6.5–6.10 | 12,080 | 19,850 | 6 | 7770 | 1295 | 10.72 | 64.32 | 34.09 |
| 6.16–6.19 | 16,810 | 23,920 | 4 | 7110 | 1778 | 10.57 | 42.3 | 23.85 | |
| 6.25–6.29 | 19,740 | 27,020 | 5 | 7280 | 1456 | 7.38 | 36.88 | 21.86 | |
| 2018 | 5.19–5.25 | 15,960 | 25,310 | 7 | 9350 | 1336 | 8.37 | 58.58 | 34.75 |
| 6.18–6.25 | 11,780 | 19,650 | 8 | 7870 | 984 | 8.35 | 66.81 | 20.61 | |
| 2019 | 5.28–6.1 | 16,550 | 20,280 | 5 | 3730 | 746 | 4.51 | 22.54 | 23.19 |
| 6.10–6.13 | 14,950 | 17,760 | 4 | 2810 | 703 | 4.7 | 18.8 | 21.63 | |
| 2020 | 6.1–6.8 | 13,000 | 17,700 | 8 | 4700 | 588 | 4.52 | 36.15 | 29.53 |
| 6.21–6.30 | 21,200 | 37,400 | 10 | 16,200 | 1620 | 7.6 | 76.4 | 27.64 | |
| 2022 | 5.26–5.31 | 18,900 | 21,900 | 6 | 3000 | 500 | 2.64 | 15.87 | 24.66 |
| 2023 | 5.28–6.3 | 8760 | 18,800 | 7 | 10,040 | 1434 | 16.37 | 114.61 | 27.15 |
| 2024 | 7.7–7.13 | 19,100 | 34,000 | 7 | 14,900 | 2129 | 11.15 | 78.01 | 21.79 |
| Hydrological Indicators | Flood Pulse Initial Discharge | Peak Flow | Duration of Flood | Daily Flow Growth | Total Flow Growth | Fish Sense Daily Flow Increases | Fish Feel Cumulative Flow Increase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson correlation coefficient | −0.534 * | −0.168 | −0.125 | 0.325 | 0.547 * | 0.718 ** | 0.611 ** |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, Z.; Lin, J.; Zhang, D.; Zheng, T.; Yu, L.; Wang, Y.; Ren, Y. Analysis of the Spawning Response Characteristics of Four Major Chinese Carps to Eco-Hydrological Processes in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Water 2025, 17, 3212. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223212
Wang Z, Lin J, Zhang D, Zheng T, Yu L, Wang Y, Ren Y. Analysis of the Spawning Response Characteristics of Four Major Chinese Carps to Eco-Hydrological Processes in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Water. 2025; 17(22):3212. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223212
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Zicheng, Junqiang Lin, Di Zhang, Tiegang Zheng, Lixiong Yu, Yizhe Wang, and Yufeng Ren. 2025. "Analysis of the Spawning Response Characteristics of Four Major Chinese Carps to Eco-Hydrological Processes in the Three Gorges Reservoir" Water 17, no. 22: 3212. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223212
APA StyleWang, Z., Lin, J., Zhang, D., Zheng, T., Yu, L., Wang, Y., & Ren, Y. (2025). Analysis of the Spawning Response Characteristics of Four Major Chinese Carps to Eco-Hydrological Processes in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Water, 17(22), 3212. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17223212

