Next Article in Journal
Zoning Method for Groundwater Pollution Risk Control in Typical Industrial–Urban Integration Areas in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrology and Climate Change in Africa: Contemporary Challenges, and Future Resilience Pathways
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Drought Analysis Methods: A Multidisciplinary Review with Insights on Key Decision-Making Factors in Method Selection

by
Abdul Baqi Ahady
*,
Elena-Maria Klopries
,
Holger Schüttrumpf
and
Stefanie Wolf
Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(15), 2248; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152248
Submission received: 1 June 2025 / Revised: 10 July 2025 / Accepted: 18 July 2025 / Published: 28 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Hydrology)

Abstract

Drought is one of the most complex natural hazards, characterized by its slow onset, persistent nature, diverse sectoral impacts (e.g., agriculture, water resources, ecosystems), and dependence on meteorological, hydrological, and socioeconomic factors. Over the years, significant scientific effort has been devoted to developing methodologies that address its multifaceted nature, reflecting the interdisciplinary challenges of drought analysis. However, previous reviews have typically focused on individual methods, while this study presents a unified, multidisciplinary framework that integrates multiple drought analysis methods and links them to key factors guiding method selection. To address this gap, five widely used methods—index-based, remote sensing, threshold-level methods (TLM), impact-based methods, and the storyline approach—are critically evaluated from a multidisciplinary perspective. In addition, the study examines spatial and temporal trends in scientific publications, illustrating how the application of these methods has evolved over time and across regions. The primary objective of this review is twofold: (1) to provide a holistic, state-of-the-art synthesis of these methods, their applications, and their limitations; and (2) to evaluate and prioritize the critical decision-making factors, including drought type, data type/availability, study scale, and management objectives that influence method selection. By bridging this gap, the paper offers a conceptual decision-support framework for selecting context-appropriate drought analysis methods. However, challenges remain, including the vast diversity of methods beyond the scope of this review and the limited consideration of less influential factors such as user expertise, computational resources, and policy context. The paper concludes with insights and recommendations for optimizing method selection under varying circumstances, aiming to support both drought research and effective policy implementation.
Keywords: drought; index-based; remote sensing; threshold-level method (TLM); impact-based forecasting (IbF); storyline approach drought; index-based; remote sensing; threshold-level method (TLM); impact-based forecasting (IbF); storyline approach
Graphical Abstract

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahady, A.B.; Klopries, E.-M.; Schüttrumpf, H.; Wolf, S. Drought Analysis Methods: A Multidisciplinary Review with Insights on Key Decision-Making Factors in Method Selection. Water 2025, 17, 2248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152248

AMA Style

Ahady AB, Klopries E-M, Schüttrumpf H, Wolf S. Drought Analysis Methods: A Multidisciplinary Review with Insights on Key Decision-Making Factors in Method Selection. Water. 2025; 17(15):2248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152248

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahady, Abdul Baqi, Elena-Maria Klopries, Holger Schüttrumpf, and Stefanie Wolf. 2025. "Drought Analysis Methods: A Multidisciplinary Review with Insights on Key Decision-Making Factors in Method Selection" Water 17, no. 15: 2248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152248

APA Style

Ahady, A. B., Klopries, E.-M., Schüttrumpf, H., & Wolf, S. (2025). Drought Analysis Methods: A Multidisciplinary Review with Insights on Key Decision-Making Factors in Method Selection. Water, 17(15), 2248. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17152248

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop