Next Article in Journal
Episodic vs. Sea Level Rise Coastal Flooding Scenarios at the Urban Scale: Extreme Event Analysis and Adaptation Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Variations in Water Table Orientation on LNAPL Migration Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Heavy Metal Pollution in Water and Seston in a Subtropical Coastal Lagoon of the Gulf of Mexico: Hydrometeorological and Anthropic Influence
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current State of Arsenic, Fluoride, and Nitrate Groundwater Contamination in Northern Mexico: Distribution, Health Impacts, and Emerging Research

by
Mélida Gutiérrez
1,*,
María Teresa Alarcón-Herrera
2,
María Socorro Espino-Valdés
3 and
Luz Idalia Valenzuela-García
2
1
School of Earth, Environment and Sustainability, Missouri State University, Springfield, MO 65897, USA
2
Department of Sustainable Energy, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados S.C. (CIMAV), Durango 34147, Mexico
3
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua 31124, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2025, 17(13), 1990; https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131990
Submission received: 26 April 2025 / Revised: 14 June 2025 / Accepted: 29 June 2025 / Published: 2 July 2025

Abstract

The plateaus of north-central Mexico have an arid to semiarid climate and groundwater naturally contaminated with inorganic arsenic (iAs) and fluoride (F). Like other arid and semiarid areas, this region faces great challenges to maintain a safe supply of drinking and irrigation water. Studies conducted in the past few decades on various locations within this region have reported groundwater iAs, F, and nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), and either their source, enrichment processes, health risks, and/or potential water treatments. The relevant findings are analyzed and condensed here to provide an overview of the groundwater situation of the region. Studies identify volcanic rocks (rhyolite) and their weathering products (clays) as the main sources of iAs and F and report that these solutes become enriched through evaporation and residence time. In contrast, NO3-N is reported as anthropogenic, with the highest concentrations found in large urban centers and in agricultural and livestock farm areas. Health risks are high since the hot spots of contamination correspond to populated areas. Health problems associated with NO3-N in drinking water may be underestimated. Removal technologies of the contaminants remain at the laboratory or pilot stage, except for the reverse osmosis filtration units fitted to selected wells within the state of Chihuahua. A recent approach to supplying drinking water free of iAs and F to two urban centers consisted of switching from groundwater to surface water. Incipient research currently focuses on the potential repercussions of irrigating crops with As-rich water. The groundwater predicaments concerning contamination, public health impact, and irrigation suitability depicted here can be applied to semiarid areas worldwide.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Groundwater scarcity results from depletion of aquifers and from contamination that renders the water unusable for drinking and/or irrigation [1,2]. Arid and semiarid regions are particularly vulnerable to both depletion and contamination of aquifers, a situation that is becoming critical in many regions, especially those with intensive agriculture [3,4]. Jasechko et al. [3] report declining groundwater levels in 24% and 8% of the aquifer systems in arid and semiarid climate zones, respectively, plus an accelerated decline in the agricultural areas under these climates. To make things worse, longer droughts and more intense storms are an expected effect of climate change in arid and semiarid areas [4,5,6], as are the increased evaporation [4], higher groundwater temperatures [7], and the potential for catastrophic floods [8].
Like other arid and semiarid areas, northern Mexico faces a plethora of challenges to maintain a safe supply of drinking and irrigation water to its inhabitants. An additional hurdle is that the groundwater in part of this region is naturally contaminated with inorganic arsenic (iAs) and fluoride (F). This contaminated region is an elevated plateau flanked by a mountain range to the east and one to the west. The co-occurrence of iAs and F in this region of Mexico is well-known [9,10,11,12,13]. The relatively flat topography and semiarid climate of this central region form endorheic basins in about half of its territory, allowing the enrichment of these contaminants as compared to the better-drained coastal areas next to it [11]. iAs and F contamination has also been reported in other world regions, including China, India, and Argentina [9,10]. Recent studies recognize iAs, F, and NO3-N as the most concerning contaminants in drinking water affecting human health, and this has resulted in multiple studies on their occurrence, governing mechanism, and health risk [11,14]. While NO3-N is now a global concern and its content is associated with anthropogenic sources, iAs and F sources differ depending on location: northern India and regions with humid climates and delta regions report the source to be associated mainly with the presence of clays and industrial waste. In contrast, Argentina, northern Mexico, and the southwestern U.S. associate their content with the presence of silicic volcanic rocks such as rhyolite and ignimbrite [9,10,11,14]. Similar to other regions contaminated with iAs, F, and NO3-N, studies in northern Mexico have multiplied in the past few decades, reporting their concentrations in groundwater, potential sources, enrichment processes, health and environmental impacts, exposed population, and/or cost-effective removal technologies [11,12,13,15]. These studies have gradually formed a more precise picture of the origin of these contaminants and their enrichment processes; whereas older studies reported arsenopyrite, fluorite, and industrial wastes as main contributing sources to iAs and F, the large contribution of iAs and F by silicic volcanic rock and volcanic glass became evident under repeated scrutiny, as well as geogenic nature and less industrial waste being the predominant nature of iAs and F contamination in groundwater [9,10,11,12]. Thus, the studies condensed here each constitute a piece towards understanding the processes responsible for iAs and F concentrations, and this, in turn, is a step forward to better managing the water resource to supply water for drinking and irrigation purposes sustainably. Nitrate (NO3−, or as nitrate-nitrogen NO3-N), a parameter that groundwater studies should include due to its widespread presence, was observed in high concentrations in groundwater of the studied region; therefore, it was included in this study. A compilation and in-depth analysis of groundwater quality studies (iAs, F, and NO3-N) conducted in north-central Mexico is presented here to better appraise the present situation of groundwater availability and identify the most affected areas within this region as well as those areas in which environmental and public health information are scarce. Due to the widespread occurrence of these contaminants around the world and their relevance to public health, these results can be applied to other semiarid areas elsewhere facing similar challenges.
The specific objectives of this review are as follows:
  • Provide an overview of iAs, F, and NO3-N contamination of groundwater in north-central Mexico, an area where high concentrations have been reported.
  • Map the areas where studies have been conducted to identify the distribution of high and low concentrations, as well as areas where monitoring data are lacking.
  • Provide updated information about the effects on public health of the ingestion of these contaminants via drinking water to the local population.
  • Compile the current situation on water treatment for drinking water supply and document the recent changes in water management that will alter the percentage of surface to groundwater in both drinking water and irrigation water, a change that may negatively affect irrigation water quality.

2. Description of the Study Area

The study area comprises the north-central Mexican states of Chihuahua, Coahuila, and Durango, which enclose a high plateau and the highest concentrations of groundwater iAs, F, and NO3-N in Mexico [14], although the concentrations are highly variable. The region occupies a surface area of 225,243 km2.

2.1. Hydrogeology

The north-central portion of Mexico has a mountainous landscape and high plateaus (Figure 1). Climatically, the region belongs to the Chihuahuan Desert and geologically to the Basin and Range province. The latter geological province resulted from Cenozoic volcanism and its related extensional stresses [16]. The volcanism that formed the Sierra Madre Occidental occurred during the subduction of the Farallon Plate in the Oligocene. The Sierra Madre Occidental is composed of a thick mass of volcanic rocks of rhyolitic composition, which host numerous mineral deposits, including gold, silver, lead, zinc, and fluorite. The mining of the latter deposits has been an important historic economic activity of the region. Weathering of the volcanic rock produces rock fragments, minerals such as clays, and ions in solution. The weathering process is facilitated by the smaller size and thus increased surface area of rock fragments that fill intermontane basins.
The eastern edge of the study area is flanked by another mountain range, the Sierra Madre Oriental, which is composed of folded sedimentary rocks (limestones, shales, sandstones, and evaporites) of Paleozoic age. The area between these mountain ranges contains elongated hills trending SE to NW, forming intermontane basins where alluvial aquifers and endorheic basins are common [17]. The intermontane basins function as unconfined alluvial aquifers [17] for the most part, although clay lenses may produce confinement conditions in places. The study area contains a total of 137 alluvial aquifers: 61 in Chihuahua, 48 in Durango, and 28 in Coahuila. About half of the territorial expanse consists of endorheic basins. Alluvial aquifers have an irregular geometry and variable depth, with an estimated average depth of 800 m. Groundwater flows towards discharging streams in exorheic basins, which ultimately discharge to either the Gulf of Mexico or the Pacific Ocean, or towards the center of endorheic basins [11,12].
Figure 1. Map of the study area showing the areas encompassed by the various groundwater studies (a to n) reporting [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. iAs, F, and NO3-N contamination within the Mexican states of Chihuahua, Durango, and Coahuila. The Comarca Lagunera is shown in pink. Map modified from NOAA Global Relief Model [30].
Figure 1. Map of the study area showing the areas encompassed by the various groundwater studies (a to n) reporting [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. iAs, F, and NO3-N contamination within the Mexican states of Chihuahua, Durango, and Coahuila. The Comarca Lagunera is shown in pink. Map modified from NOAA Global Relief Model [30].
Water 17 01990 g001

2.2. Climate and Land Use

Once historical mining decreased, economic activities shifted to agriculture and livestock after dams were built on key rivers [31]. The region has a variety of climates depending on elevation; however, the aquifers are restricted to the basins, where alluvial aquifers form. The region faces recurrent droughts that can last up to twelve years [32,33]. Most recently, it has experienced two exceptional droughts, one in 2012 and another in 2024 [34].
Paradoxically, arid areas can be important agricultural regions [35]. The agricultural areas in northern Mexico are top producers of foodstuff (groundnuts, peppers, and onions) and forage (oats, alfalfa, and corn) and manifest the problems typical of arid climates: overexploitation, soil salinity, and groundwater contaminated with agricultural wastes (nitrates, herbicides, etc.) [13,31]. Overexploitation of the aquifers has produced declining water levels and cones of depression under urban centers [18] and agricultural areas [13].

3. Groundwater Quality

Contaminants of concern include naturally occurring iAs and F, which have been extensively studied since the occurrence of fluorosis or arsenicosis first appeared in the region [36]. The volcanic rocks of rhyolitic composition that outcrop in the region are a known source of iAs and F, which are released into the water upon weathering of the rock fragments. Other potentially toxic contaminants that occur at lower concentrations and under localized conditions include uranium, selenium, and sulfate [24,26,37,38]. High concentrations of sulfate, exceeding 500 mg L−1 SO4, have been reported in the eastern part of the study area, including the Comarca Lagunera [26,27] and northern Coahuila [24]. A contaminant increasingly present in aquifers worldwide and in this region is nitrate, which is discussed in Section 3.2. The aforementioned studies report oxic conditions in the aquifers within the study area and circumneutral to slightly alkaline pH values [11,12,17,18,20].

3.1. iAs and F

The groundwater of the study area contains iAs and F in a wide range of concentrations, many of them at toxic levels [11], and a presence associated with natural sources [17], in agreement with other regions where these solutes co-occur [9,10]. Water quality studies within the study area target locations where these contaminants have been observed in high concentrations, among them urban and agricultural centers [12,13,17,18]; although some studies have been conducted on non-irrigated rural regions as well [15]. Both iAs and F are considered incompatible in magma and to become enriched during the late stage of magma crystallization [39]; therefore, they have been traced to the weathering of rhyolitic volcanic rocks and desorption from their secondary minerals (clays and iron oxyhydroxides) [11,17]. Their distribution is reported as variable and highly dispersed over the area [12]. The release of iAs and F from the rock depends on conditions such as the composition of the rock, temperature, and presence of other substances in solution. The dispersed iAs and F concentration pattern has been attributed to the (a) heterogeneity of the alluvial fill and (b) presence of mineral deposits and mining tailings [12]. Various factors of enrichment have been identified, including the amount of clay in the alluvial fill [23], residence time [21], and evaporation [11,12,26]. Concentrations may also be locally impacted by the presence of wastes or hydrothermal fluids [12,27,36].

3.2. Nitrate

Among the anthropogenic contaminants affecting groundwater systems, nitrate has received much attention in the last few decades, as it is affecting aquifers worldwide [40,41]. Nitrate is labeled an anthropogenic contaminant because its sources have been intrinsically related to an excess of N-based fertilizer and treated or untreated sewage, although in some desert regions, undisturbed deposits of N-salts may have formed naturally [42]. Nitrate concentrations are expressed as NO3 or as nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N); the former is more commonly used in the Americas and the latter in Europe and Asia. Values of NO3-N concentration can easily be obtained after multiplying NO3 values by 0.2258. Nitrate acts as an indicator of many other contaminants associated with its sources, including herbicides in the case of fertilizers and pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other emergent contaminants in manure or sewage. Contaminants in groundwater flow towards its discharge, where they enter receiving streams and/or lakes. This input has been identified as an important contributor to stream contamination [2].

3.3. Contaminant Levels and Spatial Distribution

The concentrations of iAs, F, and NO3-N reported by recent studies are listed in Table 1. Their methods of sampling and analytical determinations consistently report that they have followed standard procedure as well as strict quality assessment and quality control guidelines (e.g., letting a casing volume of water run prior to taking the sample, maintaining the sample cool during transport to the laboratory, use of grade quality reagents, replicates, blanks, and standardization). The areas encompassed by these studies are shown in Figure 1 to allow a visual appraisal of their location, extent, and distribution within north-central Mexico.
As observed in Table 1, all iAs, F, and NO3-N concentrations vary widely in each studied area. However faintly, patterns of concentrations can be recognized, showing the parts that are richer in one contaminant: The highest iAs concentrations, up to 800.0 mg L−1 iAs, are found in southern Chihuahua and the Comarca Lagunera. The highest F concentration, 45.2 mg L–1 is reported in SE Durango, whereas NO3-N concentrations peak in the Comarca Lagunera and eastern part of Durango, with values up to 127.7 mg L−1 NO3-N. Furthermore, the highest concentrations of iAs and NO3-N are found in endorheic basins under arid climatic conditions, which are conducive to salt accumulation [12,44], whereas the highest F concentrations correspond to the foothills of the Sierra Madre Occidental [12]. Roughly, and in agreement with the lithology of the eastern and western edges of the study area, iAs and F concentrations diminish with increasing distance from the Sierra Madre Occidental, while other solutes increase, e.g., calcium (Ca2+), sulfate (SO42−), and bicarbonate (HCO3) [12,13,24,27].
As shown in Figure 1, the surface area encompassed by areas reported in studies a-m (except study k) comprises each a small fraction of the total surface area. These studied areas concentrate around large urban centers (Chihuahua, Torreón, Gomez Palacio, and Durango) or areas with intensive agriculture and livestock farming (irrigation districts). In these areas, groundwater levels are rapidly declining, an average of 0.4 m year−1 in Chihuahua and 1.5 m year−1 in the Comarca Lagunera [31]. The depiction of the areal extent occupied by these studies exposes significant gaps in data coverage, e.g., north and northeast Chihuahua and northern Coahuila. The similar hydrogeology and climate within the study area are conducive to assuming that the non-studied areas will also contain groundwater contaminated with iAs and F; however, sampling wells in the non-studied areas would be needed to ascertain groundwater contamination.
To better visualize the dispersion of concentrations for each parameter (iAs, F, and NO3-N), boxplot diagrams for the different geographic locations within the study area were constructed. The results are depicted in Figure 2. The southwest quadrant of Durango [11] was selected as representative of Durango in this comparison. A noticeable enrichment of iAs (mean concentrations at about the 10 µg L−1 guideline) is observed, with concentrations observed in order of higher to lower for iAs: Southwest Durango = Comarca Lagunera > Chihuahua; F: Southwest Durango > Chihuahua > Comarca Lagunera; and NO3-N: Comarca Lagunera > Chihuahua = Southwest Durango. This graph includes the guidelines (red lines) to facilitate the identification of regions where the median concentrations surpass the guidelines, e.g., iAs and F in southwest Durango and As and NO3-N in the Comarca Lagunera.
Under the arid conditions and an enrichment of bicarbonate ions, calcite may reach saturation conditions, which has been reported for endorheic basins in the eastern part of the study area, where carbonate rocks are exposed [12,13]. Under these conditions, F concentrations decrease, a behavior explained as the possible co-precipitation of F with precipitating calcite [12].
Groundwater iAs and F concentrations vary widely with geographic location [11,12]. However, their content within a particular well varies only slightly with respect to time [45,46,47]. The high variability in concentrations is explained by the heterogeneity of the alluvial fill and from differences in climate and topography, land use, and groundwater extractions [11,12,18,25]. To better address these variations, some studies divided their study area into sub-areas according to recharge, transition, and discharge areas [25] or by geographic quadrants [12].
Trends in the concentration of the above contaminants have been reported only in a few studies [46,47]. A robust statistical trend requires a minimum of ten years of data for each season, a drawback for regions where monitoring data are fragmented and scarce, as is the case in arid and semiarid areas of developing countries, including northern Mexico. Nevertheless, these few studies coincide that concentration trends are generally stable in groundwater quality with respect to time, with a few wells experiencing a slightly increasing or decreasing trend in one or more water quality parameters [22,46,47]. This result suggests that, except for a few aquifers, the groundwater systems have not yet reached a critical level and may be able to take in the increase in temperature and evaporation expected because of global climate change. Of course, the current trend towards reforestation and other strategies implemented in northern Mexico towards the protection of water quality may result in groundwater quality improvement, as happened in Denmark after Europe’s Nitrate Directive and policy action plans were implemented [48]. A concerning fact in Mexico is that since 2020, monitoring by the Mexican national water office, CONAGUA, has diminished significantly [45], thus affecting access to water quality data that is vital to the proper management of water for drinking, irrigation, and ecological purposes—data especially important nowadays when the quantity and quality of groundwater cannot be taken for granted.
Conceptual models of the groundwater flow and contaminant transport reported for the alluvial aquifers of northern Mexico agree that the recharge areas are within the foothills, their alluvial fans, and streams, while the discharge areas are streams in the case of exorheic basins and the lowest elevations in the case of endorheic basins [18,20,21,26,38]. The groundwater flows (e.g., surficial and deep) acting in these aquifers seem to be affected by temperature and concentration differentials, with the highest concentrations observed at the discharge points and not at greater depth [21,25]. A simplified sketch (Figure 3) condenses the lithology and hydrology of the study area, although one has to keep in mind that there are more than 130 alluvial aquifers (bolson type, some of them hydraulically connected) within the study area and that the lithology in this model is overly simplified. The model (Figure 3) depicts the main controlling processes described above, including the weathering of exposed rocks through hydrolysis of the silicic volcanic rocks that comprise the Sierra Madre Occidental (releasing iAs and F) and the dissolution of the sedimentary rocks exposed in the Sierra Madre Oriental (releasing Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, SO42−, and HCO3). Hydrolysis of silicate minerals results in the formation of clay and iron oxyhydroxide minerals, which become enriched in the western part of the study area and are transported downhill by wind and water. Once released from volcanic rock fragments, iAs (as arsenate ion HAsO42−) and F follow different paths; while iAs adsorbs preferentially onto clay minerals and iron oxyhydroxides, F remains in solution and only adsorbs or co-precipitates with calcite under Ca2+ and HCO3 concentrated conditions and high pH values [12].

4. Safe Limits and Drinking Water Regulations

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the following maximum limits for drinking water: As 0.01 mg L−1, F 1.5 mg L−1, and NO3-N 11 mg L−1 [49]. In Mexico, new maximum permissible limits by the Norma Oficial Mexicana (NOM) for drinking water were issued in 2022 (NOM-127-SSA1-2021) [50], replacing those issued in 2000 (Mod.NOM-127-SSA1-1994). The present limits are 0.01 mg L−1 for As, 1.0 mg L−1 for F, and 11 mg L−1 for NO3-N [50]. A lower F limit was set to protect public health by compensating for the higher water consumption in fluoride-rich areas, especially those in hot, arid climates [11]. To prevent excessive F intake and reduce the risk of dental and skeletal fluorosis, as well as other potential health effects, a lower limit was established than that recommended by the WHO.
Regarding nitrate, the permissible limit was increased from 10 mg L−1 to 11 mg L−1 based on an analysis of public health effects and a review of international recommendations established by the WHO. This adjustment, according to the Mexican officials, does not compromise health safety, aligns with international standards, and facilitates regulatory compliance in areas where natural nitrate concentrations are high [50].

5. Health Effects of Drinking Water Contaminated with iAs, F, or NO3-N

The consumption of drinking water contaminated with iAs, F, or NO3-N represents a serious public health problem in northern Mexico [14,28] and various other regions around the world [10,13]. Studies reporting iAs, F, or NO3-N contamination generally include health effects or health risk assessment of the exposed population [15,51,52,53,54,55,56,57]. While studies on the effects of either one contaminant are common, the number of health studies addressing co-exposure (two or more contaminants) are much scarcer.
The toxicity of iAs depends on the oxidation state; As(V) is less toxic than As(III) [51,52]. Chronic ingestion of water with high F concentrations can lead to dental fluorosis as well as skeletal fluorosis. Severity of health effects depends on the concentration as well as body weight and amount of daily water intake [58]. Nitrate (NO3-N) in drinking water affects especially vulnerable groups such as infants and pregnant women, e.g., methemoglobinemia, “blue baby syndrome”, which is the most documented effect of NO3-N exposure in infants under six months of age [59,60]. Recent studies point out, however, that at smaller concentrations (>2 mg L−1 NO3-N), a variety of adverse effects such as cancer and birth defects may occur [61]. Prolonged consumption of water with high NO3-N concentrations has been associated with an increased risk of gastric and colorectal cancer since nitrite can react with compounds in the stomach to form nitrosamines, substances potentially carcinogenic [62]. Recent studies report that excess NO3-N concentrations can interfere with iodine uptake by the thyroid, affecting thyroid hormone production. In adults, this may contribute to hypothyroidism [62,63].

Health Studies in North Mexico

In Mexico, approximately 3 million people are exposed to co-occurring iAs and F above the guidelines, and 9 million people are exposed to iAs [14]. These studies have mainly been conducted in northern and central Mexico, where iAs and F levels are elevated. Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 list recent health studies conducted in northern Mexico on iAs, F, and NO3, respectively.
As is evident from Table 2 and Table 3, the majority of the health research has focused on iAs and less on F and NO3, a fact that is probably explained by a larger population being exposed to iAs concentrations above the guidelines, as mentioned above, as well as a common public perception that iAs is much more toxic than F or NO3.
Nitrate (NO3) in drinking water has gradually increased in concentration and is now found in groundwater in all states of Mexico [44]. Concentration prediction models list the affected areas around large urban centers of northern Mexico (Monterrey, Torreón, and Chihuahua), where about 8 million people are at risk of consuming groundwater with NO3-N concentrations above WHO guidelines (11 mg L mg L−1 NO3-N) [44].
Health studies have intensified after evidence of adverse effects at much lower concentrations than the WHO (and Mexican) guideline, especially in the Durango part of the Comarca Lagunera, where concentrations have been reported to have a median value of 12.26 mg L−1 NO3–N [30], more than five times the median concentration of the whole study area of 2.92 mg L−1 NO3-N [82]. Health studies require a long time to collect all the information required before an association with a contaminant can be established. Table 1 shows studies conducted in the Durango part of the Comarca Lagunera addressing some of the health impacts experienced by exposure to NO3-N, while other studies (e.g., effects on women) continue being investigated [59].
Table 4. Selected health studies related to exposure of the population to nitrate in northern Mexico.
Table 4. Selected health studies related to exposure of the population to nitrate in northern Mexico.
Health IssueTarget
Population
Reference
Durango-Comarca Lagunera
Subclinical hypothyroidism due to chronic consumption of nitrate-contaminated
 water in rural areas with intensive livestock and agricultural practices
 in Durango, Mexico
Families,
General
[59]
Health risk and methemoglobin in children ingesting nitrate-contaminated
 Water
Children[83]
Methemoglobin and Heinz bodies as biomarkers in children exposed to nitrate Children[84]
On a note about prediction of health risk, high NO3-N concentrations have been related to agricultural land use and concentration by evaporation (either semiarid climate or by boiling water in homes) [44]. Because of prevailing high NO3-N concentrations and a climate conducive to the ingestion of more water, the guideline of 11 mg L−1 NO3-N seems insufficient to protect the population.
In sum, the above studies report evidence that drinking water with a high concentration of one or more iAs, F, and NO3 is affecting the health of the population accordingly. iAs has been associated with the diseases type 2 diabetes and hypertension [80], NO3-N has been linked to a high frequency of subclinical hypothyroidism, and F causes dental fluorosis and neurological problems such as a reduction of IQ. Studies also report a relation between chronic ingestion leading to more severe health effects, e.g., chronic F intake causing cardiovascular and kidney dysfunction and a decrease in the production of reproductive hormones in men [54,81]. Interestingly, public health studies report a continued increase in metabolic diseases among the population and point out that most people are unaware of the acute adverse effects of ingesting iAs, F, or NO3-N [70,79,80].

6. Removal Technologies

The quality of groundwater can be enhanced by applying appropriate treatment technologies. The simultaneous implementation of programs of community education about contaminants and water treatment as well as relying on clear policies is recommended [43,57]. Globally, many iAs and F removal technologies have been developed to reduce their content in water enough to meet WHO guidelines [85,86].
A large variety of technologies to reduce the concentration of iAs, F, and NO3-N from drinking water exist, each of which presents advantages and disadvantages [58]. A detailed description of removal technologies is beyond the scope of this review; however, Abascal et al. [41], Shaji et al. [58], Maity et al. [85], and Sanchez et al. [86] provide excellent summaries.
Several cost-effective technologies that would be applicable to the conditions of northern Mexico include adsorption using activated alumina, biochar, or chitosan [87] and electrodialysis [28]. Each of these studies reports a removal efficiency of approximately 90% of the target contaminant. Nevertheless, all but one of the treatments remain at a bench or pilot scale. The one treatment utilized on a large scale is reverse osmosis, which removes arsenic, fluoride, and other contaminants. Reverse osmosis filtration is based on the application of pressure to water with a high salt content so that water molecules are forced to pass through semipermeable membranes, retaining larger particles in another section of the system (reject water) [88]. In the state of Chihuahua, reverse osmosis units have been installed on about 320 community wells [11,88]. The filtered water is provided separately from the water distribution system at strategically located sites where the user fills a container with filtered water. The user will most likely use this water for drinking and cooking and not for any of the other household uses. By filtering only the water that will be used for drinking and cooking, this method of distribution benefits a larger number of people (estimated at 500,000) at a lower cost and generates the lowest possible amount of waste (brine). Although this measure has largely solved the compliance with drinking water regulations in many communities within the state of Chihuahua, there are other challenges to be solved, including the disposal of process waste in an environmentally friendly manner [88].
To provide safe water quality and mitigate aquifer decline, especially in groundwater containing high levels of iAs and F in the Comarca Lagunera and the city of Durango, a government plan to switch the domestic water usage from groundwater to surface water, the water supplied to the distribution network, has been recently implemented [89]. The newer plan of potable water supply in the Comarca Lagunera consists of harnessing surface runoff from the Nazas River, thereby suspending the usage of 160 wells that had supplied drinking water to a population of two million for decades. The implementation of this plan raises questions about future groundwater availability; for example, how much water will be extracted from these suspended wells, the impact of the impending technification of irrigation on groundwater levels, and the creation and enforcement of policies intended to regulate them. As the scarcely available surface water is diverted to the drinking supply network, farmers will likely supplement the water needed to irrigate crops with groundwater. The outcome of this approach will become known in the next few years, i.e., if enough water for both drinking and irrigation will be available and how this change will affect agriculture. A similar project will be implemented shortly in the city of Durango. In both cases, a drinking water treatment plant will treat the iAs-, and F-free surface water using conventional flocculation and filtration methods.

7. Emerging Research

One concern that is increasingly addressed in areas where contaminated groundwater is used for irrigation is the accumulation of its contaminants in crops [90,91,92,93,94,95]. Until recently, irrigation water in agricultural areas within the study area was provided primarily by surface water, with a small percentage coming from groundwater, but this proportion is rapidly changing to more groundwater as surface water becomes scarcer. Irrigation water with a larger percentage of groundwater represents a larger amount of iAs and F available to crops. As a result, studies on the impact of groundwater contaminants on food are being undertaken. The studies focus on crops that are either economically important to the region or crops that are staple foods. Among the contaminants studied, arsenic has received more attention [90,94,95,96,97], although fluoride [91] and lead [95] have also been investigated for some crops. Recent studies conducted in northern Mexico on arsenic accumulation by various crops are listed in Table 5.
The results obtained within the study area show that the edible parts of barley, alfalfa, and peppers contain safe levels of As, below the recommended limits by the FAO’s Codex Alimentarius of 0.2 mg kg−1 [99], while oats and onions are slightly above it. However, the above crops were sampled within a small area and are not representative of the totality of the study area, which implies that additional studies are needed to verify these levels as well as their dependence on other factors, including the contaminant content of soil, climate, and agricultural practices.

8. Conclusions

The numerous groundwater quality studies that have been recently undertaken in north-central Mexico have shed light on the source of iAs, F, and NO3-N concentrations and have identified hot spots. However, visual appraisal of their mapped study areas shows that significant portions of the surface area have not been studied. In addition, questions remain about concentration trends and the extent to which conditions such as evaporation, drainage (endorheic or exorheic basins), and residence time influence such concentrations.
Health risk assessment studies point to a large amount of the population being exposed to unsafe levels of these contaminants, and while the guideline levels for iAs and F seem to be effective, the guidelines for nitrate are lax, according to health studies that report health issues at concentrations much smaller than the 11 mg L−1 NO3-N guideline. The larger and broader population exposure has been reported for iAs, whereas the exposure of F becomes higher near the Sierra Madre Occidental in the southern part of the study area, and the exposure to NO3-N is more prevalent in the Comarca Lagunera.
Multiple treatment techniques to reduce the concentration of these contaminants in drinking and irrigation water have been investigated, from filtration to adsorption to electrocoagulation, and although many yield promising results, they remain at bench scale. Chihuahua offers its population filtered water (reverse osmosis) at strategic locations. A recent plan to switch groundwater for arsenic-free surface water in the drinking supply of two former hot spots may provide safe drinking water to a large population. Due to surface water scarcity, more groundwater is used to irrigate crops, increasing an interest in the impact that groundwater rich in iAs and F will have on typical crops, e.g., maize, onion, melon, barley, and oats.
Monitoring, treatment, and improved groundwater management remain urgent necessities to improve water quality. Aquifers’ decline affects water quality and can be ameliorated by implementing water management practices that focus on effectively curbing groundwater overexploitation and deforestation and by promoting aquifer recharge.

Author Contributions

Individual contributions of the co-authors are conceptualization, M.G. and M.T.A.-H.; methodology, L.I.V.-G.; formal analysis, M.S.E.-V.; investigation, M.G., M.T.A.-H., M.S.E.-V. and L.I.V.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G., M.T.A.-H. and M.S.E.-V.; writing—review and editing, M.G., M.T.A.-H., M.S.E.-V. and L.I.V.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created, references to the original sources of data are included in the text.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the thorough review and insightful comments of the three anonymous reviewers. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
iAsInorganic arsenic
AsIIIArsenite
AsVArsenate
MMAIIIMonomethylarsonic acid
DMAIIIDimethylarsinic acid
FFluoride
NO3-NNitrate nitrogen

References

  1. Morris, B.L.; Lawrence, A.R.L.; Chilton, P.J.C.; Adams, B.; Calow, R.C.; Klinck, B.A. Groundwater and Its Susceptibility to Degradation: A Global Assessment of the Problem and Options for Management; United Nations Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 2003; 126p. [Google Scholar]
  2. MacDonald, A.M.; Bonsor, H.C.; Ahmed, K.M.; Burgess, W.G.; Basharat, M.; Calow, R.C.; Dixit, A.; Foster, S.S.D.; Gopal, K.; Lapworth, D.J.; et al. Groundwater quality and depletion in the Indo-Gangetic Basin mapped from in-situ observations. Nat. Geosci. 2016, 9, 762–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jasechko, S.; Seybold, H.; Perrone, D.; Ying Fan, Y.; Shamsudduha, M.; Taylor, R.G.; Fallatah, O.; Kirchner, J.W. Rapid groundwater decline and some cases of recovery in aquifers globally. Nature 2024, 625, 715–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, X.; Jiang, D.; Lang, X. Future changes in Aridity Index at two and four degrees of global warming above preindustrial levels. Int. J. Climatol. 2020, 41, 278–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Allan, R.P.; Barlow, M.; Byrne, M.P.; Cherchi, A.; Douville, H.; Fowler, H.J.; Gan, T.Y.; Pendergrass, A.G.; Rosenfeld, D.; Swann, A.L.S.; et al. Advances in understanding large-scale responses of the water cycle to climate change. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2020, 1472, 49–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, L.; Brun, P.; Buri, P.; Fatichi, S.; Gessler, A.; McCarthy, M.J.; Pellicciotti, F.; Stocker, B.; Karger, D.N. Global increase in the occurrence and impact of multiyear droughts. Science 2025, 387, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Benz, S.; Irvine, D.J.; Rau, G.; Bayer PMenberg, K.; Blum, P.; Jamieson, R.C.; Griebler, C.; Kurylyk, B.L. Global groundwater warming due to climate change. Nat. Geosci. 2024, 17, 545–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cutts, E. Torrents of sediment-laden water worsened disastrous Libyan floods. Eos 2024, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kumar, M.; Goswami, R.; Patel, A.K.; Srivastava, M.; Das, N. Scenario, perspectives and mechanism of arsenic and fluoride co-occurrence in the groundwater: A review. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rodrigues Costa, F.C.; Rezende Moreira, V.; Guimaraes, R.N.; Moser, P.B.; Santos Amaral, M.C. Arsenic in natural waters of Latin-American countries: Occurrence, risk assessment, low-cost methods, and technologies for remediation. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 184, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alarcón-Herrera, M.T.; Martin-Alarcón, D.A.; Gutiérrez, M.; Reynoso-Cuevas, L.; Martín-Domínguez, A.; Olmos-Márquez, M.A.; Bundschuh, J. Co-occurrence, possible origin, and health-risk assessment of arsenic and fluoride in drinking water sources in Mexico: Geographical data visualization. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 698, 134168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gutiérrez, M.; Alarcón-Herrera, M.T.; Gaytán-Alarcón, M.P. Arsenic and fluorine in northern Mexico, spatial distribution and enrichment factors. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023, 195, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Florez-Peñaloza, J.R.; Mahlknecht, J.; Escolero, O.; Morales-Casique, E.; Montaño-Caro, J.C.; Blanco-Gaona, S.; Silva-Aguilera, R.A. Hydrochemical evolution of a semiarid endorheic basin, with intense agricultural and livestock activities. J. Hydrol. 2025, 657, 133093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jurczynski, Y.; Passos, R.; Campos, L.C. A Review of the most concerning chemical contaminants in drinking water for human health. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. González-Horta, C.; Ballinas-Casarrubias, L.; Sánchez-Ramírez, B.; Ishida, M.C.; Barrera-Hernández, A.; Gutiérrez-Torres, D.; Zacarias, O.L.; Saunders, R.J.; Drobná, Z.; Mendez, M.A.; et al. A concurrent exposure to arsenic and fluoride from drinking water in Chihuahua, Mexico. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 4587–4601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nieto-Samaniego, A.F.; Alaniz-Alvarez, S.A.; Camprubí Cano, A. La Mesa Central: Estratigrafía, estructura y evolución tectónica cenozoica. Bol. Soc. Geol. Mex. 2005, 57, 285–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reyes-Gómez, V.M.; Alarcón-Herrera, T.; Gutiérrez, M.; Núñez López, D. Fluoride and arsenic in an alluvial aquifer system in Chihuahua, Mexico: Contaminant levels, potential sources, and co-occurrence. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013, 224, 1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mahlknecht, J.; Horst, A.; Hernández-Limón, G.; Aravena, R. Groundwater geochemistry of the Chihuahua and Rio Conchos Basin (northern Mexico for water resources management. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22, 4736–4751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ochoa-Rivero, J.M.; Jacquez-Herrera, V.; Prieto-Amparán, J.A.; Loya-Fierro, O.; Ballinas Casarrubias, L.; González-Horta, C.; Olmos-Marquez, M.A.; Rocha-Gutiérrez, B.A. Risk assessment for the distribution and levels of fluoride and nitrate in groundwater in a semi-arid area of northern Mexico. Groundwat. Sust. Develop. 2023, 23, 101045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Reyes-Gómez, V.M.; Gutiérrez, M.; Nájera-Haro, B.; Núñez-López, D.; Alarcón-Herrera, M.T. Groundwater quality impacted by land use/land cover change in a semi-arid region of Mexico. Groundwat. Sust. Develop. 2017, 5, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Espino-Valdés, M.S.; Rodríguez-Lozano, D.F.; Gutiérrez, M.; Silva-Hidalgo, H.; Pinales-Munguía, A. Relationship of fluoride concentration to well depth in an alluvial aquifer in a semiarid area. Environments 2022, 9, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Espino-Valdés, M.S.; Villalobos-Gutiérrez, N.; Gutiérrez, M.; Silva-Hidalgo, H.; Pinales-Munguía, A. Temporal evolution of nitrate in Meoqui-Delicias aquifer in Chihuahua, Mexico. Tecnociencia Chihuah. 2024, 18, 1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Baeza-Galván, R.A. Aspectos geológicos del arsénico y su evolución en el acuífero Meoqui-Delicias, Chihuahua. Master’s Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, Mexico, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  24. Batista Cruz, R.Y.; Liotta, M.; Batista Rodriguez, J.A.; Montecelos Zamora, Y.; Kretzschmar, T.G.; de la Garza Rodriguez, I.M.; Blanco Moreno, J.A.; Almaguer Carmenates, Y.; Rodriguez Vega, A.; Lopez Saucedo, F.J. Hydrochemical and isotopical characterization of the Region Carbonifera aquifer: An example of hydrogeological systems in the semi-arid climates of northeastern Mexico. Appl. Geochem. 2022, 141, 105307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Torres-Martinez, J.A.; Mora, A.; Mahlknecht, J.; Daesslé, L.W.; Cervantes-Avilés, P.A.; Ledesma-Ruiz, R. Estimation of nitrate pollution sources and transformations in groundwater of an intensive livestock-agricultural area (Comarca Lagunera), combining major ions, stable isotopes, and MixSIAR model. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 269, 115445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mora, A.; Torres-Martínez, J.A.; Moreau, C.; Bertrand, G.; Mahlknecht, J. Mapping salinization and trace element abundance (including As and other metalloids) in the groundwater of north-central Mexico using a double-clustering approach. Water Res. 2021, 205, 117709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mahlknecht, J.; Aguilar-Barajas, I.; Farías, P.; Knappett, P.S.K.; Torres-Martínez, J.A.; Hoogesteger, J.; Lara, R.H.; Ramírez-Mendoza, R.A.; Mora, A. Hydrochemical controls on arsenic contamination and its health risks in the Comarca Lagunera region (Mexico): Implications of the scientific evidence for public health policy. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 857, 159347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Robledo-Peralta, A.; López-Guzmán, M.; Morales-Amaya, C.G.; Reynoso-Cuevas, L. Arsenic and fluoride in groundwater, prevalence and alternative removal approach. Processes 2021, 9, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Irigoyen-Campuzano, J.R.; Barraza-Barraza, D.; Gutiérrez, M.; Torres-Castañón, L.A.; Reynoso-Cuevas, L.; Alarcón-Herrera, M.T. Hydrogeochemical characterization of an intermontane aquifer contaminated with arsenic and fluoride via clustering analysis. Hydrology 2024, 11, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. NOAA ETOPO1 Global Relief Model. Available online: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ngdc.mgg.dem:316 (accessed on 20 March 2025).
  31. Gutiérrez, M.; Espino-Valdés, M.S.; Calleros-Rincón, E.Y.; Alarcón-Herrera, M.T. Role of nitrogen in assessing the sustainability of irrigated areas: Case study of northern Mexico. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2021, 232, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Martínez-Sifuentes, A.R.; Villanueva-Díaz, J.; Estrada-Ávalos, J.; Trucíos-Caciano, R.; Carlón-Allende, T.; Castruita-Esparza, L.U. Two centuries of drought history in the center of Chihuahua, Mexico. Forests 2022, 13, 921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Villanueva-Díaz, J.; Estrada-Ávalos, J.; Martínez-Sifuentes, A.R.; Correa-Díaz, A.; Meko, D.M.; Castruita-Esparza, L.U.; Cerano-Paredes, J. Historic variability of the water inflow to the Lazaro Cardenas Dam and water allocation in the Irrigation District 017, Comarca Lagunera, Mexico. Forests 2022, 13, 2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moreno Gómez, M.; Palma Nava, A.; Rodríguez Yebra, A.; Huysmans, M. Semi-quantitative model for aquifer resilience to droughts. Predictions and mitigation strategies in Mexico. In Proceedings of the World Groundwater Congress IAH 2024, Switzerland, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Elouafi, I. Drylands under pressure: Science and solutions for global stability. Science 2025, 387, eadv6563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Armienta, M.A.; Segovia, N. Arsenic and fluoride in the groundwater of Mexico. Environ. Geochem. Health 2008, 30, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Villalba, L.; Montero-Cabrera, M.E.; Manjón-Collado, G.; Colmenero-Sujo, L.; Rentería-Villalobos, M.; Cano-Jiménez, A.; Rodriguez-Pineda, A.; Dávila-Rangel, I.; Quirino-Torres, L.; Herrera-Peraza, E.F. Natural radioactivity in groundwater and estimates of committed effective dose due to water ingestion in the state of Chihuahua (Mexico). Rad Protect Dosim. 2006, 121, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cauich Kau, D.; Rüde, T.R.; Cardona Benavides, A.; Castro Larragoitia, J. Natural occurrence and controls of arsenic in groundwater in a semiarid basin in the Mexican Altiplano. Hydrogeol. J. 2022, 30, 2459–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bianchini, G.; Brombin, V.; Marchina, C.; Natali, C.; Godebo, T.R.; Rasini, A.; Salani, G.M. Origin of fluoride and arsenic in the Main Ethiopian Rift waters. Minerals 2020, 10, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bouselsal, B.; Satouh, A.; Egbueri, J.; Hashim, M.; Arafat, A.; Paramasivam, P.; Alzaed, A.; Hussein, E.E. Groundwater for drinking and sustainable agriculture and public health hazards of nitrate: Developmental and sustainability implications for an arid aquifer system. Results Eng. 2025, 25, 104160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Abascal, E.; Gómez-Coma, L.; Ortiz, I.; Ortiz, A. Global diagnosis of nitrate pollution in groundwater and review of removal technologies. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 152233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Linhoff, B. Deciphering natural and anthropogenic nitrate and recharge sources in arid region groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 848, 157345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mendieta-Mendoza, A.; Rentería-Villalobos, M.; Chávez-Flores, D.; Santellano-Estrada, E.; Pinedo-Álvarez, C.; Ramos-Sánchez, H. Reconnesaince of chemically vulnerable areas of an aquifer under arid conditions with agricultural uses. Agric. Water Manag. 2020, 233, 106100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mahlknecht, J.; Torres-Martínez, J.A.; Kumar, M.; Mora, A.; Kaown, D.; Loge, F.J. Nitrate prediction in groundwater of data scarce regions: The futuristic fresh-water management outlook. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 905, 166863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. CONAGUA. Comisión Nacional del Agua. Mexico’s National Network for Water Quality (RENAMECA). Available online: https://www.gob.mx/conagua/articulos/calidad-del-agua (accessed on 10 March 2025).
  46. Colmenero-Chacón, C.P.; Morales-deAvila, H.; Gutiérrez, M.; Esteller-Alberich, M.V.; Alarcón-Herrera, M.T. Enrichment and temporal trends of groundwater salinity in central Mexico. Hydrology 2023, 10, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Morales-deAvila, H.; Gutiérrez, M.; Colmenero-Chacón, C.P.; Júnez-Ferreira, H.E.; Esteller-Alberich, M.V. Upward trends and lithological and climatic controls of groundwater arsenic, fluoride, and nitrate in central Mexico. Minerals 2023, 13, 1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hansen, B.; Thorling, L.; Schullehner, J.; Termansen, M.; Dalgaard, T. Groundwater nitrate response to sustainable nitrogen management. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cotruvo, J.A. WHO guidelines for drinking water quality: First addendum to the fourth edition. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 2017, 109, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. La Actualización de la Norma Sobre Agua Potable, Perspectivas IMTA, 3(017), May 2022. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/imta/es/articulos/la-actualizacion-de-la-norma-sobre-agua-potable?idiom=es (accessed on 10 April 2025).
  51. Del Razo, L.M.; García-Vargas, G.G.; Valenzuela, O.L.; Castellanos, E.; Sánchez-Peña, L.C.; Currier, J.M.; Drobná, Z.; Loomis, D.; Stýblo, M. Exposure to arsenic in drinking water is associated with increased prevalence of diabetes: A cross-sectional study in the Zimapán and Lagunera regions in Mexico. Environ. Health A Global Access Sci. Source 2011, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Lou, B.; Wu, R.; Wang, G.; Lu, C.; Wang, H.; Pi, J.; Xu, Y. The role of reactive oxygen species in arsenic toxicity. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rahaman, M.S.; Rahman, M.M.; Mise, N.; Sikder, M.T.; Ichihara, G.; Uddin, M.K.; Kurasaki, M.; Ichihara, S. Environmental arsenic exposure and its contribution to human diseases, toxicity mechanism and management. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 289, 117940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Jiménez-Córdova, M.I.; Cárdenas-González, M.; Aguilar-Madrid, G.; Sánchez-Peña, L.C.; Barrera-Hernández, Á.; Dominguez-Guerrero, I.A.; Gonzalez-Horta, C.; Barbier, O.C.; Del Razo, L.M. Evaluation of kidney injury biomarkers in an adult Mexican population environmentally exposed to fluoride and low arsenic levels. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2018, 352, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jiménez-Córdoba, M.I.; Sánchez-Peña, L.C.; Barrera-Hernández, A.; González-Horta, C.; Barbier, O.C.; Del Razo, L.M. Fluoride exposure is associated with altered metabolism of arsenic in an adult Mexican population. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 684, 621–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tian, X.; Wang, M.; Ying, X.; Dong, N.; Li, M.; Feng, J.; Zhao, Y.; Tian, F.; Li, B.; Zhang, W.; et al. Co-exposure to arsenic and fluoride to explore the interactive effect on oxidative stress and autophagy in myocardial tissue and cell. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 2023, 253, 114647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Limón-Pacheco, J.H.; Jimenez-Cordova, M.I.; Cárdenas-González, M.; Sánchez Retana, I.M.; Gonsebatt, M.E.; Del Razo, L.M. Potential co-exposure to arsenic and fluoride and biomonitoring equivalents for Mexican children. Ann. Glob. Health 2018, 84, 257–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Shaji, E.; Sarath, K.V.; Santosh, M.; Krishnaprasad, P.K.; Arya, B.K.; Babu, M.S. Fluoride contamination in groundwater: A global processes, challenges, and residual measures. Geosc. Front. 2024, 15, 101734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. García-Torres, E.; Pérez-Morales, R.; González-Zamora, A.; Calleros-Rincón, E.Y. Subclinical hypothyroidism in families due to cic consumption of nitrate-contaminated water in rural areas with intensive livestock and agricultural practices in Durango, Mexico. Water 2022, 14, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Roy, P.D.; Garcia-Arriola, O.A.; Selvam, S.; Vargas-Martinez, I.G.; Sanchez-Zavala, J.L. Geochemistry of some fuoride and nitrate enriched water resources from the Oriental Basin: A prospective health risk hotspot from eastern-central Mexico. Environ. Geochem. Health 2025, 47, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hamlin, Q.F.; Martin, S.I.; Kendall, A.D.; Hyndman, D.W. Examining relationships between groundwater nitrate concentrations in drinking water and landscape characteristics to understand health risks. GeoHealth 2022, 6, e2021GH000524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ward, M.H.; Jones, R.R.; Brender, J.D.; de Kok, T.M.; Weyer, P.J.; Nolan, B.T.; Villanueva, C.V.; Van Breda, S.G. Drinking water nitrate and human health: An updated review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Street, M.E.; Shulhai, A.M.; Petraroli, M.; Patianna, V.; Donini, V.; Giudice, A.; Gnocchi, M.; Masetti, M.; Montani, A.G.; Rotondo, R.; et al. The impact of environmental factors and contaminants on thyroid function and disease from fetal to adult life: Current evidence and future directions. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1429884, Frontiers Media SA. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bommarito, P.A.; Xu, X.; González-Horta, C.; Sánchez-Ramírez, B.; Ballinas-Casarrubias, L.; Santos Luna, R.; Román Pérez, S.; Hernández Ávila, J.E.; García-Vargas, G.G.; Del Razo, L.M.; et al. One-carbon metabolism nutrient intake and the association between body mass index and urinary arsenic metabolites in adults in the Chihuahua cohort. Environ. Int. 2019, 123, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Currier, J.M.; Ishida, M.C.; González-Horta, C.; Sánchez-Ramírez, B.; Ballinas-Casarrubias, L.; Gutiérrez-Torres, D.S.; Hernández Cerón, R.; Viniegra Morales, D.; Baeza Terrazas, F.A.; Del Razo, L.M.; et al. Associations between arsenic species in exfoliated urothelial cells and prevalence of diabetes among residents of Chihuahua, Mexico. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 1088–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Martin, E.; González-Horta, C.; Rager, J.; Bailey, K.A.; Sánchez-Ramírez, B.; Ballinas-Casarrubias, L.; Ishida, M.C.; Gutiérrez-Torres, D.S.; Hernández Cerón, R.; Viniegra Morales, D.; et al. Metabolomic characteristics of arsenic-associated diabetes in a prospective cohort in Chihuahua, Mexico. Toxicol. Sci. 2015, 144, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Méndez, M.A.; González-Horta, C.; Sánchez-Ramírez, B.; Ballinas-Casarrubias, L.; Hernández Cerón, R.; Viniegra Morales, D.; Baeza Terrazas, F.A.; Ishida, M.C.; Gutierrez-Torres, D.S.; Saunders, J.; et al. Chronic exposure to arsenic and markers of cardiometabolic risk: A cross-sectional study in Chihuahua, Mexico. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rocha-Amador, D.O.; Calderón, J.; Carrizales, L.; Costilla-Salazar, R.; Pérez-Maldonado, I.N. Apoptosis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in children exposed to arsenic and fluoride. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2011, 32, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Cárdenas-González, M.; Osorio-Yáñez, C.; Gaspar-Ramírez, O.; Pavković, M.; Ochoa-Martínez, A.; Lopez-Ventura, D.; Medeiros, M.; Barbier, O.C.; Pérez-Maldonado, I.N.; Sabbisettu, V.S.; et al. Environmental exposure to arsenic and chromium in children is associated with kidney injury molecule-1. Environ. Res. 2016, 150, 653–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Facio-Campos, R.A.; Rendon-Von-Osten, J.; Calleros-Rincón, E.Y.; García-Vargas, G.G.; Téllez-López, M.A.; Olivas-Calderón, E. Organochlorine pesticide residues and urinary arsenic and fluoride levels in mothers and their newborns who are residents of rural areas in Durango State, Mexico. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2024, 35, 1028–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sánchez-Rodríguez, B.L.; Castillo-Maldonado, I.; Pedroza-Escobar, D.; Delgadillo-Guzmán, D.; Soto-Jiménez, M.F. Association of obesity, diabetes, and hypertension with arsenic in drinking water in the Comarca Lagunera province (north-central Mexico). Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Olivas-Calderón, E.; Recio-Vega, R.; Gandolfi, A.J.; Lantz, R.C.; González-Cortes, T.; Gonzalez-De Alba, C.; Froines, J.R.; Espinoza-Fematt, J.A. Lung inflammation biomarkers and lung function in children chronically exposed to arsenic. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2015, 287, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Recio-Vega, R.; Gonzalez-Cortes, T.; Olivas-Calderón, E.; Lantz, R.C.; Gandolfi, A.J.; Gonzalez-De Alba, C. In utero and early childhood exposure to arsenic decreases lung function in children. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2015, 35, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Rojas, D.; Rager, J.E.; Smeester, L.; Bailey, K.A.; Drobná, Z.; Rubio-Andrade, M.; Stýblo, M.; Garcia-Vargas, G.; Fry, R.C. Prenatal arsenic exposure and the epigenome: Identifying sites of 5-methylcytosine alterations that predict functional changes in gene expression in newborn cord blood and subsequent birth outcomes. Toxicol. Sci. 2015, 143, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. García Salcedo, J.J.; Roh, T.; Nava Rivera, L.E.; Betancourt Martínez, N.D.; Carranza Rosales, P.; San Miguel Salazar, M.F.; Rivera Guillén, M.A.; Serrano Gallardo, L.B.; Niño Castañeda, M.S.; Guzmán Delgado, N.E.; et al. Comparative biomonitoring of arsenic exposure in mothers and their neonates in Comarca Lagunera, Mexico. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 16232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Jiménez Villarreal, J.; Murillo Ortiz, B.; Martínez Garza, S.; Rivas Armendáriz, D.I.; Boone Villa, V.D.; Carranza Rosales, P.; Betancourt Martínez, N.D.; Delgado Aguirre, H.; Morán Martínez, J. Telomere length analysis in residents of a community exposed to arsenic. J. Biochem. Molec. Toxicol 2019, 33, e22230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Méndez-Gómez, J.; García-Vargas, G.G.; López-Carrillo, L.; Calderón-Aranda, E.S.; Gómez, A.; Vera, E.; Valverde, M.; Cebrián, M.E.; Rojas, E. Genotoxic effects of environmental exposure to arsenic and lead on children in Region Lagunera, Mexico. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008, 1140, 358–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Vega-Millán, C.B.; Dévora-Figueroa, A.G.; Burgess, J.L.; Beamer, P.I.; Furlong, M.; Lantz, R.C.; Meza-Figueroa, D.; O’Rouke, M.K.; Garci -Rico, L.; Meza-Escalante, E.R.; et al. Inflammation biomarkers associated with arsenic exposure by drinking water and respiratory outcomes in indigenous children from three Yaqui villages in southern Sonora, México. Environ Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 34355–34366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Andrew, A.S.; Burgess, J.L.; Meza, M.M.; Demidenko, E.; Waugh, M.G.; Hamilton, J.W.; Karagas, M.R. Arsenic exposure is associated with decreased DNA repair in vitro and in individuals exposed to drinking water arsenic. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 1193–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Jiménez-Córdoba, M.I.; González-Horta, C.; Ayllón-Vergara, J.; Arreola-Mendoza, L.; Aguilar-Madrid, G.; Villareal-Vega, E.E.; Barrera-Hernández, Á.; Barbier, O.C.; Del Razo, L.M. Evaluation of vascular and kidney injury biomarkers in Mexican children exposed to inorganic fluoride. Environ. Res. 2019, 169, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ortiz-Pérez, D.; Rodríguez-Martínez, M.; Martínez, F.; Borja-Aburto, V.H.; Castelo, J.; Grimaldo, J.I.; de la Cruz, E.; Carrizales, L.; Díaz-Barriga, F. Fluoride-induced disruption of reproductive hormones in men. Environ. Res. 2003, 93, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gutiérrez, M.; Alarcón-Herrera, M.T.; Ochoa-Rivero, J.M. Impacto de factores de concentración en la calidad del agua subterránea en el norte-centro de México. Tecnociencia Chihuah. 2022, 16, e953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Calleros-Rincón, E.Y.; Alarcón-Herrera, M.T.; Pérez, R.; Cueto, J.A.; Moran, J.; Sanin, L.H. Evaluación de riesgo sistémico y niveles de metahemoglobina en niños que consumen agua contaminada por nitratos. Ingeniería 2012, 16, 183–194. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
  84. Calleros-Rincón, E.Y.; Pérez Morales, R.; González Zamora, A.; Alba Romero, J.J.; Avalos Calleros, B.Y.; Olivas Calderón, E.H. Metahemoglobina y cuerpos de Heinz como biomarcador de exposición a nitratos en niños. XVII Congreso Internacional de Ciencias Ambientales, Mexico. Rev. Latinoam. El Ambiente Y las Ciencias 2018, 9, 15–29. [Google Scholar]
  85. Maity, J.P.; Vithanage, M.; Kumar, M.; Ghosh, A.; Mohan, D.; Ahmad, A.; Bhattacharya, P. Seven 21st century challenges of arsenic-fluoride contamination and remediation. Groundw. Sustain. Develop. 2021, 12, 100538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sánchez Hidalgo, G.C.; Ábrego-Bonilla, J.; Deago, E.; Ortega Del Rosario, M.D.L.A. Global perspectives on groundwater decontamination: Advances and challenges of the role of permeable reactive barriers. Hydrology 2025, 12, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Burillo, J.C.; L. Ballinas G. Burillo E. Guerrero-Le D. Lardizabal-Gutiérrez, H.; Silva Hidalgo, H. Chitosan hidrogel synthesis to remove arsenic and fluoride ions from groundwater. J. Hazard. Mat. 2021, 417, 126070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Espino Valdés, M.S. Calidad del agua subterránea en el Estado de Chihuahua: Retos y logros en la búsqueda de soluciones Sustentables para el agua de consumo. In Problemáticas del Agua y Medidas Sustentables en Estados Desérticos de México; Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora: Obregón, Mexico, 2019; ISBN 978-607-609-205-7. Available online: www.itson.mx (accessed on 15 May 2025).
  89. Gobierno de México Entrega Infraestructura del Proyecto Agua Saludable para La Laguna. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/940222/Comunicado_de_prensa_0596-24.pdf (accessed on 12 April 2025).
  90. Alam, M.F.; Villholth, K.G.; Podgorski, J. Human arsenic exposure risk via crop consumption and global trade from groundwater-irrigated areas. Environ. Res. Lett. 2021, 16, 124013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mondal, D.; Gupta, S. Influence of fluoride contaminated irrigation water on biochemical constituents of different crops and vegetables with an implication to human risk through diet. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2015, 6, 3134–3142, ISSN 2028–2508. [Google Scholar]
  92. Rosas-Castor, J.M.; Guzmán-Mar, J.L.; Hernández-Ramírez, A.; Garza-González, M.T.; Hinojosa-Reyes, L. Arsenic accumulation in maize crop (Zea mays): A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 488–489, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Baig, J.A.; Kazi, T.G.; Shah, A.Q.; Afridi, H.I.; Kandhro, G.A.; Khan, S.; Kolachi, N.F.; Wadhwa, S.K.; Shah, F.; Arain, M.B.; et al. Evaluation of arsenic levels in grain crops samples, irrigated by tube well and canal water. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011, 49, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Hermosillo-Muñoz, M.C.; Valles Aragon, M.C.; Ballinas-Casarrubias, M.L.; Rocha-Gutierre, B.A.; Prieto-Amparan, J.A. Traceability of arsenic in agricultural irrigation water from center-south of Chihuahua State, Mexico. Rev. Int. Contam. Amb. 2019, 35, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ochoa-Rivero, J.M.; Gutiérrez, M.; Álvarez-Holguín, A.; Rubio-Arias, H.O.; Rocha-Gutiérrez, B.A.; Ponce-García, O.C. Comparing the uptake of arsenic by barley and oats growing in a semiarid area irrigated with either groundwater or treated wastewater. Minerals 2023, 13, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Pineda-Chacón, G.; Alarcón-Herrera, M.T. Arsenic uptake and distribution in Cucumis melo and Citrullus lanatus plants. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2016, 35, 750–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Espino Valdés, M.S.; Domíngues Cervantes, F.; Villalba, M.L.; De la Garza-Aguilar, R.; Pinales-Munguía, A. Impacto de suelos y cultivos de alfalfa por el riego con agua con alto contenido de arsénico en Julimes, Chihuahua; GEOS, Union Geofisica Mexicana: Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, 2013; Volume 33, p. 81. Available online: https://www.ugm.org.mx/raugm2013/ (accessed on 15 May 2025).
  98. Ruiz Hernández, M.R. Evaluación de la Acumulación de Arsénico por Alfalfa. Master’s Thesis, Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro, Torreón, Mexico, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  99. Codex-Stan 193-1955; General Standard for Contaminants and Toxins in Food and Feed; Food and Agricultural Organization and World Health Organization (FAO/WHO): Rome, Italy, 1995.
Figure 2. Boxplot diagrams of concentration distribution of As, F, and NO3-N reported for selected areas: Chihuahua [18,19,20], Comarca Lagunera [26], and Southwest Durango [12]. The WHO drinking water guideline is included (red line) for comparison. The box contains half of the data, the line inside the box is the median, and the x is the average value of the dataset. Small circles above the whiskers represent outlier concentrations. Letters a, b, c, i, and k correspond to the areas depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 2. Boxplot diagrams of concentration distribution of As, F, and NO3-N reported for selected areas: Chihuahua [18,19,20], Comarca Lagunera [26], and Southwest Durango [12]. The WHO drinking water guideline is included (red line) for comparison. The box contains half of the data, the line inside the box is the median, and the x is the average value of the dataset. Small circles above the whiskers represent outlier concentrations. Letters a, b, c, i, and k correspond to the areas depicted in Figure 1.
Water 17 01990 g002
Figure 3. Conceptual model of the geochemical processes controlling the presence of iAs, F, and NO3-N under the oxic conditions, alkaline pH, and semiarid climate of the study area.
Figure 3. Conceptual model of the geochemical processes controlling the presence of iAs, F, and NO3-N under the oxic conditions, alkaline pH, and semiarid climate of the study area.
Water 17 01990 g003
Table 1. Average and range of values of As, F, and NO3-N as reported by selected studies, including the number of aquifers Naq, wells Nwells, and measurements Ndata. n.a. = not applicable.
Table 1. Average and range of values of As, F, and NO3-N as reported by selected studies, including the number of aquifers Naq, wells Nwells, and measurements Ndata. n.a. = not applicable.
Location, Naq, NwellsNdataiAs
µg L−1
F
mg L−1
NO3-N
mg L−1
Reference
State of Chihuahua
  El Sauz-San Diego, 4, 4545
38.5
(1.5–344)
1.49
(0.02–9.7)
12.9
(0.5–30.7)
[18]
  Chihuahua, central, 2, 154524.4
(1.0–226)
2.73
(0.37–20.7)
3.96
(0.18–23.7)
[20]
  Chihuahua City, 1, n.a92n.a.
1.64
(0.46–3.60)
2.53
(0.48–10.6)
[19]
  Irrig. District 005, 1, 6363n.a.
1.58
(0.62–4.8)
7.5
(0.7–23.2)
[21,22]
  Irrig. District 005, 1, 404086.9
(7.0–489.0)
n.a.
n.a.
[23]
  Chihuahua, south, 8, n.a.44548
(0.1–419.8)
1.30
(0.05–11.8)
n.a.
[15]
  Jiménez-Camargo, 1, 3030150
(10–800)
n.a.
7.6
(0.5–32.5)
[43]
State of Durango
  NW Durango, 14, 4428627.6
(0.7–369.5)
1.53
(0.02–9.1)
2.1
(0.004–15.4)
[12]
  SW Durango, 16, 6426647.0
(0.7–386.5)
3.94
(0.02–45.2)
2.1
(0.009–18.5)
[12]
  NE Durango, 7, 15341240.0
(0.7–462.8)
0.85
(0.02–3.6)
11.1
(0.008–127.7)
[12]
  SE Durango, 11, 5827348.0
(0.7–310.0)
1.75
(0.10–15.8)
4.3
(0.005–81.9)
[12]
  Durango City, 1, 9932.0
(n.a.)
3.89
(n.a.)
8.7
(n.a.)
[28]
  Valle del Guadiana, 1, 404041.1
(1.5–199.8)
0.17
(0.01–0.58)
0.16
(0–0.62)
[29]
Comarca Lagunera
  Comarca Lagunera, 6, 313170.0
(10–350)
0.88
(0.12–3.1)
7.7
(0.01–45.0)
[27]
  Recharge zone, 6, 2929n.a.
1.1
(0.12–4.5)
20.2
(1.5–109.0)
[25]
  Transition zone, 6, 99n.a.
0.6
(0.25–1.1)
4.3
(0.14–4.3)
[25]
  Discharge zone, 6, 1515n.a.
1.0
(0.31–3.1)
1.2
(0.01–2.6)
[25]
  Comarca Lagunera, 6, 555551.9
(5.0–349)
0.98
(<0.2–4.54)
12.3
(<0.02–109)
[26]
Table 2. Selected health studies related to exposure to iAs in northern Mexico (study area plus state of Sonora).
Table 2. Selected health studies related to exposure to iAs in northern Mexico (study area plus state of Sonora).
Health Concerns/Health IssuesTarget
Population
Reference
Chihuahua
 Association between body mass index and urinary arsenic metabolites Adult [64]
 Diabetes, elevated triglycerides and cholesterol, and cardiometabolic riskGeneral [65,66,67]
Durango
 Apoptosis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in As-exposed children Children [68]
 Exposure to As and Cr is associated with kidney injury molecule-1Children [69]
 Urinary arsenic and fluoride in mothers in rural areas and their newbornsMothers
Newborns
[70]
Comarca Lagunera
 Increased prevalence of diabetes after exposure to arsenic in waterGeneral [51]
 Association of obesity, diabetes, and hypertension with arsenic in waterGeneral [71]
 Lung inflammation biomarkers and lung function in children chronically
   exposed to arsenic
Children[72,73]
 Prenatal arsenic exposure and functional changes in gene expression in
   newborn cord blood and subsequent birth outcomes
Women,
Newborn
[74,75]
 Telomere length analysis in residents of a community exposed to arsenicChildren,
general
[76,77]
Sonora
 Inflammation biomarkers associated with arsenic exposure by water
   and respiratory outcomes
Children [78]
 Decreased DNA repair in vitro and in individuals exposed to AsGeneral [79]
Table 3. Selected health studies related to exposure to F in northern Mexico (study area plus State of San Luis Potosi).
Table 3. Selected health studies related to exposure to F in northern Mexico (study area plus State of San Luis Potosi).
Health Concerns/Health IssuesTarget
Population
Reference
Chihuahua
 Vascular and kidney injury biomarkers in Mexican children exposed to
   inorganic fluoride
Children[80]
 Evaluation of kidney injury biomarkers in an adult Mexican population
   environmentally exposed to fluoride and low arsenic levels
Adult[54]
Durango
 Urinary arsenic and fluoride in mothers in rural areas and their newborns
San Luis Potosi
 Fluoride-induced disruption of reproductive hormones in men Men[81]
Table 5. Accumulation of arsenic (As) in crops growing in northern Mexico.
Table 5. Accumulation of arsenic (As) in crops growing in northern Mexico.
LocationCropStudied PartAs
mg kg−1
Reference
ChihuahuaJalapeño pepper
Serrano pepper
Onion
Fruit
Fruit
Bulb
0.016
0.050
0.38
[94]
ChihuahuaBarley
Oats
Grain
Stems
Grain
Stems
0.20
0.62
0.55
1.53
[95]
ChihuahuaAlfalfaLeaves and stems<0.02[97]
DurangoCorn tortillaFood item0.14–0.54[92]
DurangoMelon plants Leaves and
Stem
Root
5.2
34
[96]
Comarca LaguneraMaizeGrain0.12[92]
Comarca LaguneraAlfalfaLeaves and stems 2.2–23.3[98]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gutiérrez, M.; Alarcón-Herrera, M.T.; Espino-Valdés, M.S.; Valenzuela-García, L.I. Current State of Arsenic, Fluoride, and Nitrate Groundwater Contamination in Northern Mexico: Distribution, Health Impacts, and Emerging Research. Water 2025, 17, 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131990

AMA Style

Gutiérrez M, Alarcón-Herrera MT, Espino-Valdés MS, Valenzuela-García LI. Current State of Arsenic, Fluoride, and Nitrate Groundwater Contamination in Northern Mexico: Distribution, Health Impacts, and Emerging Research. Water. 2025; 17(13):1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131990

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gutiérrez, Mélida, María Teresa Alarcón-Herrera, María Socorro Espino-Valdés, and Luz Idalia Valenzuela-García. 2025. "Current State of Arsenic, Fluoride, and Nitrate Groundwater Contamination in Northern Mexico: Distribution, Health Impacts, and Emerging Research" Water 17, no. 13: 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131990

APA Style

Gutiérrez, M., Alarcón-Herrera, M. T., Espino-Valdés, M. S., & Valenzuela-García, L. I. (2025). Current State of Arsenic, Fluoride, and Nitrate Groundwater Contamination in Northern Mexico: Distribution, Health Impacts, and Emerging Research. Water, 17(13), 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17131990

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop