Next Article in Journal
Spatio-Temporal Interpolation and Bias Correction Ordering Analysis for Hydrological Simulations: An Assessment on a Mountainous River Basin
Next Article in Special Issue
Regional-Scale Distribution of Helium Isotopes in Aquifers: How Informative Are They as Groundwater Tracers and Chronometers?
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Ambient Microbiota on the Gut Microbiota of Macrobrachium rosenbergii
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi Frequency Isotopes Survey to Improve Transit Time Estimation in a Situation of River-Aquifer Interaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Preliminary Assessment of Young Water Fractions in Groundwater from Alluvial Aquifers Facing the Northern Italian Apennines

1
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Dipartimento di Palermo, Via Ugo la Malfa n.153, 90146 Palermo, Italy
2
Hydrogeologist, Via Maccagnano n. 170, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
3
GEOINVEST Srl, Via della Conciliazione n. 45/A, 29122 Piacenza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2022, 14(4), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040659
Submission received: 2 January 2022 / Revised: 13 February 2022 / Accepted: 14 February 2022 / Published: 20 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Residence Times by Isotopic Techniques)

Abstract

:
This study sums up the first estimates of the young water fraction (Fyw; here understood as the percentage proportion of groundwater passing through the well’s screen and younger than approximately 2–3 months) from groundwater collected in 75 wells from alluvial fans facing the northern Italian Apennines of Italy. The Fyw estimates were based on a monthly dataset of water-stable isotopes (oxygen-18 (18O)) from surficial water (9 rivers), while the dataset of groundwater (75 wells) consisted of three-monthly isotopic data. In the cases of surficial water and stable isotopes, these lasted over the period of January 2003 to December 2007, while in the case of groundwater, the data were collected from January 2005 to December 2007. The values of Fyw were estimated by means of a sine-wave fitting technique; the results made evident the presence of unexpectedly reduced differences between groundwater. In particular, shallower groundwater hosted in aquifers from the apical parts of the alluvial fans (i.e., aquifers characterized by the coarsest materials such as gravels and sands, and closest to the recharge areas) showed similar values of Fyw to the deepest aquifers from the distal parts; however, former studies mentioned here evidenced the existence of poorly recharged old groundwater. Our results seem to confirm a complex behavior of these aquifers compared with what had previously been thought.

1. Introduction

In Italy, the alluvial fans of rivers flowing out from the northern Apennines and Alps have always been considered the main recharge zones for aquifers hosted in the Po Plain [1]. The Southern sector of the Po Plain faces the northern Apennines and groundwater recharge is focused there in the apical part of the alluvial fans [2,3,4], where both streambed dispersion and rainfall percolation from the topsoil are promoted by the wide outcrops of coarser materials, such as gravels and sands. After reaching the groundwater hosted in the apical part of the alluvial fans, water molecules start to move northwards, driven by a reduced hydraulic gradient (up to 0.001). The time required by water molecules to reach the distal part of the alluvial fans differs depending on flow paths. By means of carbon-14 (14C) and tritium (3H), the groundwater from different wells located in the distal parts of several alluvial fans facing the northern Italian Apennines was dated [5]. The authors found that aquifers from alluvial fans are characterized by relatively young groundwater (1–15 TU), in which renewal processes (mainly fed by streambed dispersions) are active due to the highest hydraulic conductivities of the riverbed materials. Moving northwards, and with simultaneous reduction in the hydraulic conductivities and departure from the main recharge areas, groundwater ages were even higher than 5000 years in the case of low-plain areas (wells characterized by a depth in the order of 150–200 m) and higher than 5–50 kyrs in the deepest wells.
It should be highlighted that groundwater samples collected in a well are composed of different quotas of water, each one characterized by a group of water molecules travelling along a flow path with a specific travel time. Such quotas cannot be distinguished by the isotopic dating alone.
Among the several environmental tracers available in the literature (see, for instance: [6,7]), oxygen isotopes of water have been demonstrated to be powerful tools in unraveling complex hydrogeological problems, such as (with no claim to be exhaustive): (i) mixing between groundwater of different origins; (ii) estimating the area of groundwater recharge [8]; (iii) characterizing which component (precipitation or losses from the streambeds) is exclusive or prevalent in recharging alluvial aquifers [3]; and (iv) assessing the Mean Residence Time MRT of surficial water and groundwater (e.g., [6]).
With reference to the last point, the MRT approach couples time-extended time-series of water isotopes with the lumped parameters model. Finally, the MRT method provides a distribution of ages (representing the different flow paths composing the groundwater samples) and a final mean value, which is the mass-weighted average residence time of all the water flow paths.
Very recently, [9] proposed the concept of the young water fraction (Fyw) to the hydrological community. The Fyw is considered to be the percentage proportion of catchment outflow younger than approximately 2–3 months and, as in the case of MRT, can be estimated starting from the amplitudes of seasonal cycles of stable water isotopes in precipitation (input) and surficial water (output). Due to its intrinsic robustness and to the reduced number of parameters required compared to the MRT approach, the results are usually less biased [9].
The formulas reported in [9] have also been proven to be effective for assessing Fyw in the case of groundwater (both mountainous springs and wells from alluvial aquifers; see [10,11,12]) with the final main objective of evaluating the risk of contamination (the greater the Fyw value, the higher the risk of groundwater being affected by pollutants). To the best of our knowledge, and unlike hydrological studies focusing on runoff generation mechanism in catchments, Fyw has never been used to obtain information on the saturated zone.
The purpose of present study is to evaluate the Fyw values from the wells of the alluvial fans facing the northern Apennines (an estimate that has never been made before on this area) and to preliminarily test its usefulness in providing further hydrogeological information on these aquifers.
The reason for having selected this study site (alluvial aquifers facing the northern Apennines) is twofold. Firstly, here, hundreds of water-stable isotope data from rivers and wells have already been made available by several researchers and can thus be used for estimating Fyw. Secondly, to date, these aquifers have been considered as characterized by a certain degree of homogeneity and isotropy as well as a pure-mass water transfer [13,14]. This means that water molecules travelling along groundwater flow paths should show a progressive reduction in Fyw in moving away from the infiltration point (apical part of the alluvial fan) along the same flow path. Thus, non-negligible values of Fyw from wells located far from the apical part of the alluvial fan represent a deviation from the aforementioned homogenous and isotropic aquifers or may evidence the presence of further recharge areas (surface aquifers or river reaches) hydraulically connected to the wells. In addition, Fyw values will be compared to the fastest travel time estimates carried out by means of the classical Darcy formula (a marker of a pure-mass water transfer, implying knowledge of the shortest flow path connecting each well to the corresponding main recharge area, i.e., apical part of the alluvial fan). The results are discussed in terms of the recharge mechanism and mass transfer vs. pressure wave phenomena acting in aquifers screened by wells.

2. Study Area

2.1. Climatic and Hydrological Settings

The study region in the northern Italian Apennines covers 6261 km2 and contains nine catchments between the Trebbia River and the Savio River (Figure 1). The elevation falls in the NE direction, ranging from 2165 m above sea level at Mt. Cimone to around 40 m above sea level at the Savio River gauge. According to [15], the mean annual rainfall distribution from 1990 to 2015 exceeded 2200 mmy−1 near the main watershed divide, then gradually declined to about 900 mm/y in the foothills. The yearly rainfall distribution is marked by a significant minimum in the summer season and two maxima in the autumn (the largest one) and spring. The cumulative annual snow cover near the main watershed divide will exceed 2–3 m by the end of the winter season. In the lowlands, potential evapotranspiration ranges from 500 to 650 mm/y and is primarily active during the summer months. The nine rivers studied all derive from the main watershed divide and flow northeast. Six rivers are tributaries of the Po River (the Trebbia, Nure, Taro, Enza, Secchia, and Panaro Rivers), while the other three (Reno, Lamone, and Savio Rivers) join the Adriatic Sea after the sampling sites. The catchment areas range from 193 km2 in Lamone to 1300 km2 in Secchia, with flow distances ranging from 28 km in Enza to 85.2 km in Secchia (Secchia). Over the period of 2006–2016, the mean annual discharges ranged from 8.4 m3 s−1 (Savio) to 30.4 m3 s−1 (Secchia). Rivers originating from the highest parts of the main watershed divide (Secchia, Panaro) have a nival–pluvial discharge regime. They are affected by the melting of snow cover deposited in the upper parts of their catchments during the winter months. As a result, significant low-flow cycles occur in the summer and early autumn (August, September, and October), while floods usually occur in the autumn (October and November) and spring (March and April). Peak discharges are generally less than 24 h after extreme precipitation events that occur during the wettest periods.

2.2. Hydrogeological Features

The alluvial deposits derived from the Apennine chain make up the southern sector of the Po valley. The stratigraphic situation is highly differentiated, and summarized as follows: Generally, the aquifer thickness increases rapidly northwards. Simultaneously, the grain size of the permeable materials decreases [16]. Considering the apical part of the alluvial fans, the thickness varies between 3 and 20 m in the reach of rivers still inside the Apennines valleys. There, the gravel lies on a pre-Holocene substratum made up of impermeable marine formations (Calabrian and Pliocene) [17]. As close as 2 km from the hill margin, the thickness of alluvial deposits (gravel–sand alternated at the depth with silt and clay) reaches 50–100 m in the vicinity of the foothills (Figure 1).
Northwards, the depth decreases, and at the extremes of the most extended alluvial fans (i.e., at a distance of 10–75 km from the hills), it reaches 400–500 m east of Parma. The gravel fans are less extensive to the southeast of the Reno, and around Rimini, then they dip into the Adriatic Sea. The number of gravel beds ranges from three to ten, with a total thickness of less than 30 percent on average. Folds and faults significantly affect the substratum [18,19] and control the thickness of the alluvial fans, which are up to 700 m thick [20]. The Po River’s alluvial deposits are found north of the plain’s final section (northwards of the distal part of the alluvial fans). They are made up of dense sand beds. The Po River’s alluvial deposits are found to the north of the plain’s final area. They are made up of sand beds (up to 40 m thick) interspersed with clay. From the hydrogeological point of view, and being made up of gravels and sands, the apical part of the alluvial fans act as a monolayer aquifer directly recharged by both zenithal infiltration and streambed dispersions [3]. In several cases, streambed dispersion is largely prevalent [4,21]. Going downstream, the fine sediments interpose and separate the cone-shaped gravelly bodies from each other, while on the surface, they bury the more superficial gravel, and the aquifer becomes of a multi-layer type. In this intermediate section, the ground–river exchange is limited to the more superficial aquifers. Aquifer transmissivity is in the range of 10−1–10−3 m2 s−1 [20]. The highest values were recorded in the alluvial fans of the Trebbia, Nure, Taro, Enza, Secchia, Panaro and Reno rivers located in the western side of the southern Po valley. In contrast, the lowest values were recorded in the eastern side of the southern Po valley, particularly in the alluvial fans of Lamone and Savio rivers. In the upper plain where gravels are present, the wells are usually less than 120 m in depth and only occasionally exceed 250 m for large town water supply pipelines. Their density is very high at up to 10 or more wells per km2, and significant drops have been recorded in past 50 years in the water static levels, accompanied by aquifer exhaustion and a water balance deficit of the order of 24 million m3 [22]. The highest deficit values are measured on the western side of the area, while the lowest values have been reported for the eastern side [23]. Most of the groundwater hosted in the aquifers within the alluvial fan aquifers show a Ca (Mg)-HCO3 facies and are characterized by a TDS ranging from 200 to 1500 mg/L. Ca(Mg)–SO4 groundwater (TDS range = 750–2400 mg/L) occurs in the alluvial fan of the Secchia river, and is the result of the interaction between meteoric waters and gypsum of the Triassic and Messinian ages [5].

3. Methodology

The study consists of two subsequent steps. Firstly, we used isotopic time series of stable isotopes from rivers and wells already available in the literature ([5,24]; see Supplementary Materials Table S1 for the final dataset compilation used and for the instruments and analytical precisions reported in the aforementioned studies) to obtain the Fyw and corresponding uncertainties (see Section 3.1 for further details). Secondly, we carried out statistical interpolation on the groundwater levels from the wells to obtain the equipotential lines and flow-nets of each fan. In this way, we reconstructed the shortest flow paths connecting the recharge areas and wells for each alluvial fan (see Supplementary Materials Figure S1, in which the piezometric surface and flow nets are reported). Then, we carried out a calculation on fastest travel time FTT, as per Section 3.2. Finally, and with FTT being a pure estimate of mass transfer, we compared Fyw, FTT and other parameters (see Section 3.3) through the Pearson and Spearman rank correlation matrices to obtain information on the recharge mechanism and mass (in terms of water molecules) transfer within the aquifers.

3.1. Young Water Fraction

As mentioned in the Introduction, the young water fraction (Fyw) has recently been proposed by [9]. It is considered the percentage proportion of catchment outflow younger than approximately 2–3 months, and can be estimated starting from the amplitudes of seasonal cycles of stable water isotopes (δ18O) in precipitation (Ain) and river water (Aout), with the following expression:
F yw = A out A in
Although it was initially proposed for river water, it has recently been proven that this approach is reliable for assessing young water fractions of groundwater from mountainous areas (spring waters: [25,26,27]) and lowlands (wells: [10]). As a matter of fact, such an approach allows estimate uncertainties to be strongly reduced compared with the well-known Mean Travel Time formulation [9,28]. This is due to a reduced vulnerability of this index to aggregation bias and to less sensitivity to the assumed shape of the catchment transit-time distribution.
For the sake of convenience, we describe below the calculation, considering only the time series of δ18O from precipitation (Ain), river water, and groundwater (Aout). Ain and Aout (here, we recall what is meant as the amplitudes of the sinusoids) are obtained by interpolating each time series of δ18O with a modelled sine wave. The latter is characterized by specific mathematical expressions that, in the case of Ain, is:
δ 18 O in ( i ) = δ 18 O mean + A in ( cos ( wi ) )
in which δ18Oin(i) is the modelled isotopic composition of precipitation at time i; δ18 O_mean is the estimated mean value of δ18O from precipitation over the considered time period; and w is the angular frequency (equal to 2π/T, in which T is the period between two consecutive d18O peaks).
The output time series δ18O_out(i) from river water and groundwater are still sinusoidal, but their amplitudes Aout are reduced with respect to input sinusoid δ18O_in (i), while cosine also includes a phase lag (φ; the phase lag or time between the annual peaks of δ18O in radians):
δ 18 O out ( i ) = δ 18 O mean + A out ( cos ( wi + ϕ ) )
Estimates of Fwy are reported along with the corresponding uncertainties. The latter were estimated thanks to the error propagation method [29]. As an example, if Ain and Aout are obtained along with their ±σ uncertainties (here renamed as ±dAin and ±dAout), the corresponding errors ±dFyw associated to the specific value of young water fraction is obtained as follows:
dF yw = ( dA in A in ) 2 + ( dA out A out ) 2

3.2. Fastest Travel Time

The fastest travel time (FTT, in years) represents the time spent by water molecules travelling along the shortest flow path that connects the recharge areas to the specific well [30,31]. To estimate FTT, we carried out a particle-tracking scheme starting with a groundwater flow net and Darcy’s law. This approach (i.e., particle tracking with a groundwater flow net and Darcy’s law) has been widely used to define the flow paths of solute particles (here understood as contaminants) in the groundwater under purely active transport (for both drawing the protection zones of wells and remediation/mitigation activities; see [32,33,34], which we do not claim to be exhaustive, wherein FTT is equivalent to the time of arrival of the fastest contaminant to the control point, i.e., the well). The tracking of water molecule particles placed in a groundwater flow field can be solved by using either analytical or numerical methods [35].
In our case, we used the analytical method simplified by considering the hydrogeological media (i.e., aquifers) as homogeneous (hydrogeological properties are constant in each point of the aquifer) and isotropic (hydrogeological properties are independent of the direction of measurement at each point of the aquifer).
Thus, assuming a homogeneous and isotropic medium, the Darcy velocity q (ms−1) can be obtained as:
q = K · i
where K (ms−1) is the hydraulic conductivity and i (dimensionless) the hydraulic gradient. The latter is calculated as follows:
i = Δ H L
where L (m) is the horizontal distance between the recharge area and the well while ΔH (m) is the head loss (here we recall that both parameters must be obtained by considering the particle track direction).
Being calculated over a unique section of the aquifer, q must be considered the apparent velocity of the water molecules, as its formulation takes into account both the solid skeleton and the voids (pores).
The seepage velocity v (ms−1) is the effective velocity reached by water molecules into the pores, and requires a knowledge of the effective porosity (ne, dimensionless) of the medium:
v = q n e
The fastest travel time FTT (in days) is finally calculated as:
FT T = L 2 + Δ H 2 v · 86400
It should be pointed out that the FTT values obtained, as per Formula (8), represent the velocities of the fastest water molecules arriving at the wells being calculated along the shortest flow path between the recharge area and the specific well. From a conceptual point of view, it is evident that FTT is inherently different from the groundwater Mean Residence Time. The latter is defined as the time obtained by averaging all the flow paths conveying water molecules from the recharge area to the well and can be calculated by processing a transit-time distribution. Unlike MRT, the young water fraction (Fyw), as defined in Section 3.1, represents the most recent portion of the transit-time distribution, i.e., the fastest flow paths reaching the well, and can be conceptually compared to TT.
Hydraulic conductivities (K) and effective porosities (ne) were made available by [36], which sums up the averaged values of such parameters from tens of pumping tests carried out in each alluvial fan.
Equipotential lines (i.e., lines connecting points with the same hydraulic head), from which the groundwater flow net was reconstructed, were obtained starting from the mean groundwater levels measured in each well. In detail, six-monthly groundwater level data from each well were available from 2001 to 2012 and were further averaged as a unique value for each well. Finally, the averaged values were interpolated in a GIS environment by means of the Ordinary Kriging (OK) method, which is the most popular kriging method, and is widely used in hydrogeological studies worldwide involving the three-dimensional development of piezometric surfaces [37,38]. The OK consists of a statistical approach in which observed values are interpolated following both a weighted average of the neighboring points and their overall spatial arrangement, to estimate the value of an unobserved point. For the mathematical detail, readers are referred to [39]. Once OK were carried out, the resulting piezometric surfaces were further checked by means of semivariogram models to ensure that the spatial variation of hydraulic heads was statistically homogeneous across the whole surface (i.e., the same pattern of variation can be observed at all locations on the surface).
Finally, and for each well, we extracted the shortest flow net (i.e., the particle-track line) connecting each well to the corresponding recharge area, and we made calculations as per the above-mentioned Formula (8).

3.3. Parameters Processed into the Pearson and Spearman Correlation Matrices

In addition to the aforementioned FTT and Fyw, a statistical comparison through Pearson and Spearman matrices was carried out by taking into account a further six parameters that were calculated for each well. Namely, the distance of the well from the apical part (DAP in m; we recall that the apical part of each alluvial fan was preliminarily considered as the main recharge area of groundwater feeding the well); the linear distance between the well and the nearest river reach (DR in m); the altitude of the well (A in m a.s.l.); the well depth (WD in m b.g.l.); the depth of slotting (DS in m b.g.l.); and the maximum slotting depth (MSD in m b.g.l.; this parameter was necessary as several wells were equipped with a number of filters slotted at different depths). It is worth noting that in case of wells with filters slotted at different depths, we considered DS to be the mean depth (in m b.l.g) of the deepest filter.
For all the parameters (and thus, also for FTT and Fyw), and before the statistical comparison by Pearson and Spearman rank correlation matrices, all the results were aggregated per alluvial fan (one mean value for each of the nine alluvial fans). In the case of the parameters DAP and DR, we distinguished both minimum (DAPm and DRm) and maximum (DAPM and DRM) values per alluvial fan. All the parameters are summarized in the Supplementary Materials S1.
Pearson and Spearman matrices reflect the magnitude of similarity among the eight parameters. Pearson correlation is the most widely used parametric test ranking, through its r coefficient, the relationship between linearly related variables. Since the main assumption of this test is that the variables are normally distributed (variables have a bell-shaped curve), linearity assumes a straight-line relationship between each of the two variables. Spearman is a nonparametric approach that is commonly used when the assumptions of the Pearson correlation are violated (variables not normally distributed). In detail, the Spearman correlation coefficient determines the monotonic relationship between two variables (here, we recall that monotonicity implies that as the value of one variable increases so does the value of the other variable, even if not linearly) by means of its rs coefficient. Both correlation coefficients (r and rs) describe the strength and direction between the two variables and return the closer value to 1 (or −1) when the two different datasets have a strong positive (or negative) relationship. The significance probability (p-value) for both the Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients calculated in this study was set at 0.05, meaning that p-values lower than 0.05 represented statistically significant relationships. Readers are referred to [39] for further details on statistical formulations.

4. Results

Table 1 summarizes the results (minimum, maximum, mean values and corresponding standard deviations for Ain, DAPM and DAPm, DRM and DRm, A, WD, DW, MSD and Fyw) of calculations from all of the alluvial fans, along with the number of wells used for the estimates (the number of wells ranged from three in the Nure River to sixteen in the Secchia River). The variations in the δ18O isotopic content of the river waters were higher in the rivers Lamone and Savio, with Ain equal to 0.978 and 1.091, respectively. The lowest value of Ain (0.291) was detected in the Reno River. By passing to the wells, their DAP (we recall that the apical part was considered the main recharge zone for the groundwater hosted within the alluvial fan) varied from 3300 m (Enza River) to about 50,000 m (Reno River). The proximity to the river reach (DR) decreased from 9 m (Reno River) to about 16,000 m (Secchia River).
The Panaro River was characterized by the lowest mean WD (70 m ± 27) as well as DS (59 m ± 17; wells are often characterized by multiple filters intersecting several aquifers). On the contrary, the abovementioned WD and DS were highest in the case of the Savio River (158 m ± 94 and 151 m ± 96, respectively). If we consider the MSD, the lowest value was that of the Enza River (77 m ± 32), while the highest one was again that of the Savio River (135 m ± 86).
The estimated Fyw ranged from 0.137 ± 0.087 (Lamone River; groundwater from this alluvial fan showed the lowest proportions of young water) to 0.864 ± 0.432 (Reno River). It should be pointed out that four alluvial fans showed mean values of Fyw close to 0.400 (Trebbia River: 0.394 ± 0.137; Taro River: 0.420 ± 0.440; Enza River: 0.404 ± 0.291; Secchia River 0.402 ± 0.483) while other three were close to 0.200 (Nure River: 0.220 ± 0.073; Panaro River: 0.192 ± 0.098; Savio: 0.246 ± 0.255).
In any case, remarkable ranges of the Fyw values from wells (inducing higher values of standard deviations, which in case of Secchia River, is even larger than the mean value) are evident in several alluvial fans, evidencing a high variability of such a parameter.
The fastest travel times (FTT) largely varied by minimum values of 2.5 ± 0.6 years in the case of groundwater from the Trebbia River to the 11.2 ± 2.8 years of the groundwater from the Enza River. As in the case of the Fyw, the FTTS within some specific alluvial fans are higher in some cases (see Nure River and Reno River, with standard deviations equal to 3.7 years and 3.5 years, respectively).
By taking into account possible relationships among the abovementioned parameters, a bivariate analysis (cross-correlation) was carried out. The results are presented in the form of a Pearson rank correlation matrix (here, we recall that Pearson assesses linear relationships) in Table 2, with corresponding r and p-values. The threshold value for the level of significance was set at 0.05; therefore, relationships must be considered as statistically significant if p < 0.05. In addition to the three relationships that were already expected to be positive (DS – WD: r = 0.98; DS – MSD: r = 0.85; WD – MSD; r = 0.81), we found a negative and statistically significant relationship between Fyw and DRM (r = 0.52; the farther the well is from the river reach, the more the Fyw value decreases).
If the Spearman rank correlation matrix (i.e. that assessing of non-linear monotonic relationships; see Table 3) was considered, we found to be positive and significant (p < 0.05) a larger statistical performance between Fyw and DRM (rs = 0.69) and a new negative correlation between Fyw and DRm (rs = 0.51; wells next to the river reach tended to higher values of Fyw).
It should be pointed out that in both the Pearson and Spearman rank correlation matrices, no evidence of a statistical relationship between FTT and Fyw was found (p-values equal to 0.72 and 0.74, respectively).

5. Discussion

If a well is placed in the ideal case of a homogenous and isotopic aquifer, the groundwater pumped to the surface is composed of water molecules that have travelled several flow paths and, thus, are characterized by different travel times. As in the instance of the well above, water molecules from the lower part of the filter are characterized by the longest flow paths. In such a case, by going deepest along a slotted well, the amplitude of the δ18O isotopic signal should be progressively reduced (with an expected non-linear monotonic pattern that approximates an exponential function) until it disappears completely, in turn, inducing a reduction in the young water fractions Fyw with increasing depth. The same results (decrease in Fyw) are obtained when moving away from the infiltration point along the same flow path.
Thus, water molecules seeping through the streambed start to move along specific flow paths, away from the apical part and toward the distal sectors of the alluvial fans. In our case, the shallower groundwater hosted in aquifers from the apical parts of the alluvial fans (i.e., aquifers characterized by the coarsest materials, such as gravels and sands, and closest to the recharge areas) should show the highest values of Fyw, while the deepest aquifers from the distal parts should be characterized by groundwater with the lowest values of Fyw (see Figure 2). In such cases of ideal aquifers, it should be stressed that water molecules travel along flow paths reflecting a pure-mass water transfer.
Here, we recall that this behaviour (which is observed in Figure 2 and represents a non-linear decrease in Fyw with DS or DAP) is similar to that observed in several catchments by [28], where an exponential decrease in Fyw with increasing flow-length (equivalent to DAP) and catchment areas (equivalent to DS) were experimentally found.
As we often observed a strong variation of Fyw from wells located in each considered alluvial fan (see the standard deviations reported in Table 1), we decided to plot Fyw from all 75 wells against depth and distance from the recharge zone, to verify the compliance with the abovementioned hypothetical conditions of isotropic and homogeneous aquifers. Figure 3 shows the behavior of Fyw with DS (a) and distance from the recharge area (distance from the apical part DAP (b). There was no evidence of a decrease (linear or monotonic) in Fyw with DS or DAP, with the majority of the wells characterized by Fyw values being lower than 0.3 (left part of the continuous red line in Figure 3a,b). This means that groundwater pumped from filters located at different depths or located at variable distances from the recharge area (i.e., apical parts of the alluvial fans) were characterized by almost similar values of Fyw (thus, the variability of the δ18O isotopic signal in groundwater is similar along the entire depth of the aquifer or moving far away from the recharge areas). This means that the pattern of Fyw with depth of slotting (DS) and distance from the recharge areas (DAP) suggests a more complex behaviour of these aquifers than that of the homogeneous and isotropic ones.
Moreover, only eight wells were characterized by an Fyw higher than the abovementioned selected threshold of 0.3, namely, three wells from the Enza River, three wells from the Reno River, one well from the Lamone River and one well from the Secchia River. Although Fyw values were indicative of a large amount of young waters in those wells, filters were also located at depths of up to about 200 m from the soil surface and far away from the recharge area (two wells from the Reno rivers were more than 60,000 m away from the apical part of the alluvial fan).
These patterns (almost an invariance of Fyw with DS and DAP) seemed to show that the behavior of the aquifers facing the northern Italian Apennines is quite far from ideal (homogeneous and isotropic with pure-mass transfer of water). Furthermore, and in compliance with the departure from the ideal case, both Pearson and Spearman rank correlation matrices have confirmed no evidence of a statistical relationship between FTT and Fyw (p-values in both cases largely exceeding the threshold of 0.05, and thus, no linear or monotonic relationships between such two variables).
One cause of the departure from an ideal system could be, in the case of wells located in the median or distal part of the alluvial fan, due to the (i) proximity of the river reach (DR). In this case, since these are pumping wells inducing an often remarkable lowering the piezometric head (several tens of meters as a result of large pumping rates), there could be feeding through the vertical drainage of younger water from upper unconfined aquifers by the river, or directly from surficial water. This fact was also confirmed through the quantitative and isotopic monitoring of some wells pumping groundwater for drinking purposes located at a distance of several kilometers from the apical part of the alluvial fan of the Enza River (see [40]).
Another cause may be sought in the (ii) presence of groundwater flow path with the same FTT, as a result of recharging areas developed on a reduced river reach over the same apical part of the alluvial fan. The consequence would be that of a lack of homogenization of flow path with different transit times, as the latter would not yet be present in the recharging area. The result is similar, therefore, to what we would have in a piston flow, with a stable isotope signal that would remain mostly the same, as the input signal along the whole path induces the maintenance of similar Fyw values. A third possible cause could be (iii) the presence of wells draining anisotropic and heterogeneous levels of aquifers/aquitards/aquicludes, mobilizing water with different transit times but similar stable isotopic contents (Aout), which in turn, induce equivalent values (low or high) of Fyw. As in the case of (i), these processes can also be enhanced by intense water withdrawal (already evidenced by remarkable subsidence phenomena at the soil surface; see [41,42]) forcing older groundwater to move toward filters from confined or semi-confined aquifers.
In Figure 4 we compared the 75 wells in which we had calculated Fyw with all of the wells for which tritium data were available from [5] (data are also summarized in the Supplementary Materials S1). Here, we recall that tritium still belongs to the water molecules, faithfully following their flow paths, as well as stable water isotopes; the range of the observed values in sampled groundwater was between 0 and 15 TU [5] with recently recharged water in wells having tritium between 9 TU and 15 TU [5,43]. It can be seen that the eight wells with the highest Fyw values were also characterized by high values of tritium (9–12 TU), indicating high groundwater renewal rates hosted with these aquifers (even at the annual scale). On the contrary, wells characterized by lower 18O/16O fluctuations (i.e., all other groundwater with Fyw < 0.3) were characterized by higher (up to 15 TU; renewal rate at the annual scale) or lower values of tritium (up to nil values of tritium; renewal date at the multi-decadal or higher scale). In the case of both low Fyw (<0.3) and lower values of tritium, renewal rates were low or nil. Some of the abovementioned wells (i.e., those showing both low Fyw and tritium) are located not far from the apical parts or those whose filters are slotted in the upper aquifers, suggesting some slowdown (probably linked to the causes of lithological heterogeneity) of the water molecules along their flow path to the wells. These apparent inconsistencies between isotopic data (both tritium and 18O/16O) belonging to the same water molecules further highlight the complexity of the aquifer systems investigated, which seem to behave as non-ideal (heterogeneous and isotropic) aquifers rather than ideal ones.
Thus, these results confirm that the Fyw can represent a valuable tool in hydrogeological studies involving groundwater hosted in alluvial aquifer worldwide, as it is capable of providing additional indications with respect to the use of stable isotopic values alone.
With reference to the alluvial aquifers facing the northern Apennines, further efforts need to be made to unravel their hydrogeological complexities. In particular, future works will be devoted to the Mean Residence Time MRT approach coupled with extended time-series of isotopes and chemicals (not only water isotopes but also carbon-14 (14C) and nitrates; the latter are widespread over these alluvial fans as a result of manure over their apical parts and tend to decrease northwards [44]) with a lumped parameter model. In such a way, the MRT method will allow all the different quotas of flow paths composing the groundwater samples to be dated. Furthermore, the results will be compared with geospatial maps reporting the groundwater withdrawals (here reported in Figure 4 as millions of m3 per year; however, it can be seen that most groundwater extractions are focused in alluvial fans areas) as well as groundwater excursions (see again Figure 4; even though annual excursions exceeding 12 m are concentrated in the apical part of the alluvial fans, several wells with high annual excursion are located in the distal part of the alluvial fans or even in the lowlands); these will better clarify the anthropogenic role of pumping on natural aquifers, also in terms of the variations in flow paths.

6. Conclusions

The estimates of young water fractions (Fyw) from 75 wells spanning over nine alluvial fans from the northern Italian Apennines have suggested the presence of non-ideal behaviour of aquifers facing the northern Italian Apennines. In fact, in ideal, homogeneous and isotropic aquifers—with the supposed prevailing recharge linked to the streambed losses in the apical part of the alluvial fans (with quotas of river discharge flowing towards the underlying groundwater)—we should have found reduced Fyw values towards the distal parts or towards the deeper portions of the aquifers. On the contrary we observed isotopic fluctuations in δ18O that were not univocal, with reduced values of Fyw which may characterize the groundwater hosted in the upper and lowest aquifers, as well as in some aquifers close to the apical part of the alluvial fans. The further comparison with tritium (the other isotope belonging to the water molecule) confirmed that low renewal rates (multi decadal or higher scale) have also taken place in the vicinity of the apical fans, while high renewal rates (even at the annual scale) were found even in distal parts of the alluvial fans or at depth. Such results suggest the presence of lithological heterogeneity among the multi-layered and interbedded aquifers, aquitards and aquicludes, which is present both northwards of the apical part of the corresponding recharge areas and in the depths. Apart from the role of lithological heterogeneity, cross-correlation allowed us to find a significant statistical relationship between young water fractions Fyw and distance with river reaches, indicating a possible interaction between groundwater and upper unconfined aquifers fed directly by river stream losses. We believe that such behavior requires further investigation, as it could be related to the effect of large groundwater withdrawals. The latter must be verified in future studies with more environmental tracers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/w14040659/s1, Table S1: Isotopic data δ18O and 3H along with Fyw (young water fraction), A (altitude of the well), DAP (distance from well and the apical part of the alluvial fan), DS (distance between well and the nearest river reach) WD (well depth); Figure S1: interpolated piezometric surfaces and resulting shortest flow nets used in this study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C. and G.M. (Giovanni Martinelli); methodology, F.C.; data curation, G.M. (Gianluca Medioli) and A.D.; software: F.C., formal analysis, F.C., G.M. (Gianluca Medioli) and A.D.; investigation: F.C., writing—original draft preparation, F.C.; writing—review and editing, F.C. and G.M. (Giovanni Martinelli). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are made freely available in Table S1.

Acknowledgments

An early draft of the manuscript benefited from the precious suggestions made by three reviewers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

A altitude of the well
DAPM maximum distance from apical part
DAPm minimum distance from apical part
DRM maximum distance from river
DRm minimum distance from river
FTT fastest travel time
Fyw young water fraction
MDS depth of slotting
WD well depth

References

  1. Giuliano, G. Groundwater in the Po basin: Some problems relating to its use and protection. Sci. Total Environ. 1995, 171, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cervi, F.; Dadomo, A.; Martinelli, G. The Analysis of Short-Term Dataset of Water Stable Isotopes Provides Information on Hydrological Processes Occurring in Large Catchments from the Northern Italian Apennines. Water 2019, 11, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Martinelli, G.; Dadomo, A.; Cervi, F. An attempt to characterize the Recharge of Alluvial Fans Facing the Northern Italian Apennines: Indications from Water Stable Isotopes. Water 2020, 12, 1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cervi, F.; Tazioli, A. Quantifying Streambed Dispersion in an Alluvial Fan Facing the Northern Italian Apennines: Implications for Groundwater Management of Vulnerable Aquifers. Hydrology 2021, 8, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Martinelli, G.; Chahoud, A.; Dadomo, A.; Fava, A. Isotopic features of Emilia-Romagna region (North Italy)groundwater: Environmental and climatological implications. J. Hydrol. 2014, 519, 1928–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kendall, C.; McDonnell, J.J. Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998; p. 839. [Google Scholar]
  7. Leibundgut, C.; Maloszewski, P.; Külls, C. Tracers in Hydrology; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tazioli, A.; Cervi, F.; Doveri, M.; Mussi, M.; Deiana, M.; Ronchetti, F. Estimating the isotopic altitude gradient for hydrogeological studies in mountainous areas: Are the low-yield springs suitable? Insights from the Northern Apennines of Italy. Water 2019, 11, 1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kirchner, J.W. Aggregation in environmental systems—Part 1: Seasonal tracer cycles quantify young water fractions, but not mean transit times, in spatially heterogeneous catchments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2016, 20, 279–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hartmann, A.; Jasechko, S.; Gleeson, T.; Wada, Y.; Andreo, B.; Barberá, J.A.; Brielmann, H.; Bouchaou, L.; Charlier, J.-B.; Darling, W.G.; et al. Danger of groundwater contamination widely underestimated because of shortcuts for aquifer recharge. EarthArXiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hartmann, A.; Jasechko, S.; Gleeson, T.; Wada, Y.; Andreo, B.; Barberá, J.A.; Wagener, T. Risk of groundwater contamination widely underestimated because of fast flow into aquifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2024492118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gehring, J.; Stahl, M.; Gillikin, D.; Verheyden-Gillikin, A. Streamflow capture along the Mohawk River: Determining transit time to municipal well-field. In Mohawk Watershed Symposium; College Park Hall, Union College: Schenectady, NY, USA, 2020; p. 24. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dadomo, A.; Martinelli, G. Aspetti di idrologia isotopica in Emilia-Romagna. Convegni Lincei Accad. Naz. Lincei 2005, 216, 157. [Google Scholar]
  14. Farina, M.; Marcaccio, M. Lo Stato Qualitativo Delle Acque Sotterranee; 85 Pitagora Editrice: Bologna, Italy, 2014; pp. 57–75. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cervi, F.; Nistor, M.M. High resolution of water availability for Emilia-Romagna region over 1961–2015. Adv. Meteor. 2018, 2018, 2489758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Severi, P.; Bonzi, L. Cenni sulla geologia dell’acquifero della pianura Emiliano-Romagnola. In Esperienze e Prospettive nel Monitoraggio delle Acque Sotterranee. Il Contributo dell’Emilia-Romagna; Pitagora Editrice: Bologna, Italy, 2014; pp. 19–34. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ori, G.G. Continental depositional system of the quaternary of the Po Plain (Northern Italy). Sed. Geol. 1993, 83, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amorosi, A.; Farina, M.; Severi, P.; Preti, D.; Caporale, L.; Di Dio, G. Genetically related alluvial deposits across active fault zones: An example of alluvial fan-terrace correlation from the upper Quaternary of the southern Po Basin, Italy. Sed Geol 1996, 102, 275–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Valloni, R.; Calda, N. Late quaternary fluvial sediment architecture and aquifer systems of the southernmargin of the Po River plain. Mem. Descr. Carta Geol. d’it. 2007, 76, 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  20. Regione Emilia-Romagna, ENI-Agip. Riserve Idriche Sotterranee della Regione Emilia-Romagna; S.El.CA.: Firenze, Italy, 1998; 120p. [Google Scholar]
  21. Iacumin, P.; Venturelli, G.; Selmo, E. Isotopic features of rivers and groundwater of the Parma Province(Northern Italy) and their relationships with precipitation. J. Geochem. Explor. 2009, 102, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. ARPAE, Regione Emilia Romagna. Analisi del Flusso delle Acque Sotterranee in Relazione Agli Scenari Caratterizzati da Particolari Criticità nel Rapporto Ricarica Prelievi; ARPAE: Bologna, Italia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chahoud, A.; Cristofori, D. Le pressioni antropiche in relazione alle acque sotterranee: I prelievi. In Esperienze e Prospettive nel Monitoraggio delle Acque Sotterranee. Il Contributo dell’Emilia-Romagna; Pitagora Editrice: Bologna, Italy, 2014; pp. 87–94. [Google Scholar]
  24. ARPAE, Regione Emilia Romagna. Indagini di Carattere Isotopico su Pozzi Selezionati della Rete Regionale di Controllo e su Corsi d’acqua della Regione Emilia-Romagna; ARPAE: Bologna, Italia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. Živković, K.; Radulović, M.; Lojen, S.; Pucarević, M. Overview of the Chemical and Isotopic Investigations of the Mareza Springs and the Zeta River in Montenegro. Water 2020, 12, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Fields, F.J.; Dethier, P.D. From on high: Geochemistry of alpine springs, Niwot ridge, Colorado front range, USA. Hydrol. Process. 2019, 33, 1756–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Z.; Chen, X.; Cheng, Q.; Soulsby, C. Characterizing the variability of transit time distributions and young water fractions in karst catchments using flux tracking. Hydrol. Process. 2020, 34, 3156–3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Freyberg, J.V.; Allen, S.T.; Seeger, S.; Weiler, M.; Kirchner, J.W. Sensitivity of young water fractions to hydro-climatic forcing and landscape properties across 22 Swiss catchments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2018, 22, 3841–3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Taylor, J.R. An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements, 2nd ed.; University Science Books: Sausalito, CA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yoon, H.; Hart, D.B.; McKenna, S.A. Parameter estimation and predictive uncertainty in stochastic inverse modeling of groundwater flow: Comparing null-space Monte Carlo and multiple starting point methods. Water Resour. Res. 2013, 49, 536–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tiedeman, C.R.; Shapiro, A.M. Contributing Areas to Domestic Wells in Dipping Sedimentary Rocks under Extreme Recharge Events. Groundwater 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jackson, C.R. Steady-State Particle Tracking in the Object-Oriented Regional Groundwater Model ZOOMQ3D; British Geological Survey: Nottingham, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cui, Z.; Welty, C.; Maxwell, R.M. Modeling nitrogen transport and transformation in aquifers using a particle-tracking approach. Comput. Geosci. 2014, 70, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Moutsopoulos, K.N.; Gemitzi, A.; Tsihrintzis, V.A. Delineation of groundwater protection zones by the backward particle tracking method: Theoretical background and GIS-based stochastic analysis. Environ. Geol. 2008, 54, 1081–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lu, N. A semianalytical method of path line computation for transient finite-difference groundwater flow models. Water Resour. Res. 1994, 30, 2449–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Benelli, F.; Pignone, R.; Di Dio, G. Riserve Idriche Sotterranee della Regione Emilia-Romagna; SELCA: Firenze, Italy, 2014; p. 120. [Google Scholar]
  37. Desbarats, A.J.; Logan, C.E.; Hinton, M.J.; Sharpe, D.R. On the kriging of water table elevations using collateral information from a digital elevation model. J. Hydrol. 2002, 255, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nikroo, L.; Kompani-Zare, M.; Sepaskhah, A.R.; Shamsi, S.R.F. Groundwater depth and elevation interpolation by kriging methods in Mohr Basin of Fars province in Iran. Environ. Monit. Assess 2010, 166, 387–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Davis, J.C. Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  40. Barbieri, S.; Martinelli, G. Hydrogeological features of the Enza river alluvial fan (province of Reggio Emilia). Developments in Aquifer Sedimentology And Ground Water Flow Studies in Italy. Descr. Carta Geol. d’it. 2007, 76, 17–38. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bitelli, G.; Bonsignore, F.; Del Conte, S.; Franci, F.; Lambertini, A.; Novali, F.; Severi, P.; Vittuari, L. Updating the subsidence map of Emilia-Romagna region (Italy) by integration of SAR interferometry and GNSS time series: The 2011–2016 period. Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci. 2020, 382, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Nespoli, M.; Cenni, N.; Belardinelli, M.E.; Marcaccio, M. The interaction between displacements and water level changes due to natural and anthropogenic effects in the Po Plain (Italy): The different point of view of GNSS and piezometers. J. Hydrol. 2021, 596, 126112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cervi, F.; Ronchetti, F.; Martinelli, G.; Bogaard, T.A.; Corsini, A. Origin and assessment of deep groundwater inflow in the Ca’Lita landslide using hydrochemistry and in situ monitoring. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2012, 16, 4205–4221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Martinelli, G.; Dadomo, A.; De Luca, D.A.; Mazzola, M.; Lasagna, M.; Pennisi, M.; Pilla, G. Nitrate sources, accumulation and reduction in groundwater from Northern Italy: Highlights provided by a nitrate and boron isotopic database. Appl. Geochem. 2018, 91, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study area. In green, the alluvial fans are shown. Red dots represent the 75 wells where oxygen and hydrogen isotopic values were analyzed during the period of 2003–2007. Purple diamonds represent sampling points in 9 rivers where oxygen and hydrogen isotopic values were analyzed and recorded in the period of 2005–2007 [5].
Figure 1. Study area. In green, the alluvial fans are shown. Red dots represent the 75 wells where oxygen and hydrogen isotopic values were analyzed during the period of 2003–2007. Purple diamonds represent sampling points in 9 rivers where oxygen and hydrogen isotopic values were analyzed and recorded in the period of 2005–2007 [5].
Water 14 00659 g001
Figure 2. Hypothetical behavior of Fyw with depth of slotting DS (a) and with distance from the recharge zone (distance of the from the apical part of the alluvial fan DAP) (b) in the case of ideal aquifer (perfect mixing of water molecules from several flow paths with different lengths). The x-axis also reports negative values only for graphic rendering (Fyw cannot be lower than 0).
Figure 2. Hypothetical behavior of Fyw with depth of slotting DS (a) and with distance from the recharge zone (distance of the from the apical part of the alluvial fan DAP) (b) in the case of ideal aquifer (perfect mixing of water molecules from several flow paths with different lengths). The x-axis also reports negative values only for graphic rendering (Fyw cannot be lower than 0).
Water 14 00659 g002
Figure 3. Observed behavior of Fyw with DS (a) and with distance from the infiltration zone (distance from the apical part of the alluvial fan DAP (b) for all 75 wells considered in this study. Selected threshold (Fyw = 0.3) is reported as a continuous red line. The x-axis also reports negative values only for graphic rendering (Fyw cannot be lower than 0).
Figure 3. Observed behavior of Fyw with DS (a) and with distance from the infiltration zone (distance from the apical part of the alluvial fan DAP (b) for all 75 wells considered in this study. Selected threshold (Fyw = 0.3) is reported as a continuous red line. The x-axis also reports negative values only for graphic rendering (Fyw cannot be lower than 0).
Water 14 00659 g003
Figure 4. Maps of the study area reporting wells in which tritium indicated fast renewal of groundwater (>9 TU) and reduced renewal (<9 TU), along with wells with lower (<0.3) and higher young water fractions Fyw (>0.3). Pumping rates in Millions of Cubic meters per year are also reported, as well as groundwater head excursions (annual excursion > 12 m and 0–12 m) and contour lines of tritium content.
Figure 4. Maps of the study area reporting wells in which tritium indicated fast renewal of groundwater (>9 TU) and reduced renewal (<9 TU), along with wells with lower (<0.3) and higher young water fractions Fyw (>0.3). Pumping rates in Millions of Cubic meters per year are also reported, as well as groundwater head excursions (annual excursion > 12 m and 0–12 m) and contour lines of tritium content.
Water 14 00659 g004
Table 1. Estimates of minimum–maximum, mean values, and corresponding standard deviations (SD as ±2σ) for the following results: distance of wells from the apical part (maximum DAPM and minimum DAPm), distance from of wells from river (maximum DRM and minimum DRm), young water fractions (Fyw), altitude of the wells (A), well depths (WD), depth of slotting (DS), maximum depth of slotting (MDS), fastest travel times (FTT). Number of wells used for estimates are also reported.
Table 1. Estimates of minimum–maximum, mean values, and corresponding standard deviations (SD as ±2σ) for the following results: distance of wells from the apical part (maximum DAPM and minimum DAPm), distance from of wells from river (maximum DRM and minimum DRm), young water fractions (Fyw), altitude of the wells (A), well depths (WD), depth of slotting (DS), maximum depth of slotting (MDS), fastest travel times (FTT). Number of wells used for estimates are also reported.
Alluvial FanAin Rivern° of WellsDAP
(m)
DR
(m)
FywA
(m a.s.l.)
WD
(m b.g.l.)
DS
(m)
MSD
(m b.g.l.
FTT
(y)
Min (DAPM)Max (DAPm)Min (DRM)Max (DRm)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)Mean (±SD)
Trebbia0.4069472218,787156312,2990.394 ± 0.13790 ± 2695 ± 5086 ± 51106 ± 512.5 ± 0.6
Nure0.493311,88523,60720485940.220 ± 0.07395 ± 6083 ± 1673 ± 1597 ± 1510.7 ± 3.7
Taro0.647611,88536,35440614,3680.420 ± 0.44070 ± 2173 ± 5175 ± 64104 ± 399.4 ± 2.4
Enza0.43412330025,31975512,5770.404 ± 0.29194 ± 5368 ± 4360 ± 4574 ± 4011.2 ± 2.8
Secchia0.43416728544,95349916,0260.402 ± 0.48346 ± 28109 ± 66102 ± 64118 ± 784.4 ± 1.1
Panaro0.485419,23920,957374087170.192 ± 0.09837 ± 470 ± 2759 ± 1777 ± 327.2 ± 1.8
Lamone0.9784811539,223984072910.137 ± 0.08724 ± 1799 ± 10994 ± 10797 ± 905.9 ± 2.8
Reno 0.2917984050,117914,3680.864 ± 0.43215 ± 14129 ± 63116 ± 63127 ± 426.2 ± 3.5
Savio1.0916947535,636147774010.246 ± 0.25527 ± 23158 ± 94151 ± 96135 ± 867.4 ± 2.7
Table 2. Matrix of the Pearson rank correlation (p-value on the right part; r highlighted in grey on the left part) between the considered selected parameters for the alluvial fans (DAPM—maximum and DAPm—minimum distance from apical part; DRM—maximum and DRm—minimum distance from river; Fyw—young water fraction; A—altitude of the wells; WD—well depths; DS—depth of slotting; MDS—maximum depth of slotting; FTT—fastest travel times). * significant if p < 0.05.
Table 2. Matrix of the Pearson rank correlation (p-value on the right part; r highlighted in grey on the left part) between the considered selected parameters for the alluvial fans (DAPM—maximum and DAPm—minimum distance from apical part; DRM—maximum and DRm—minimum distance from river; Fyw—young water fraction; A—altitude of the wells; WD—well depths; DS—depth of slotting; MDS—maximum depth of slotting; FTT—fastest travel times). * significant if p < 0.05.
DAPmDAPMDRmDRMFywAWDDSMDSFTT
DAPm 0.780.820.390.550.380.670.640.700.65
DAPM0.01 0.990.300.140.040.120.090.060.63
DRm0.010.00 0.100.130.280.880.910.500.54
DRM0.110.150.35 0.03 *0.680.760.800.650.63
Fyw0.050.280.300.52 * 0.670.520.580.280.72
A0.110.470.160.030.03 0.080.080.180.34
WD0.030.310.000.010.060.38 0.00 *0.00 *0.31
DS0.030.350.000.010.050.370.98 * 0.00 *0.33
MDS0.020.420.070.030.160.240.81 *0.85 * 0.26
FTT0.030.030.050.030.020.130.150.130.18
Table 3. Matrix of the Spearman rank correlation (p-value on the right part; rs highlighted in grey on the left part) between the considered selected parameters for the alluvial fans (DAPM—maximum and DAPm—minimum distance from apical part; DRM—maximum and DRm—minimum distance from river; Fyw—young water fraction; A—altitude of the wells; WD—well depths; DS—depth of slotting; MDS—maximum depth of slotting; FTT—fastest travel times). * significant if p < 0.05.
Table 3. Matrix of the Spearman rank correlation (p-value on the right part; rs highlighted in grey on the left part) between the considered selected parameters for the alluvial fans (DAPM—maximum and DAPm—minimum distance from apical part; DRM—maximum and DRm—minimum distance from river; Fyw—young water fraction; A—altitude of the wells; WD—well depths; DS—depth of slotting; MDS—maximum depth of slotting; FTT—fastest travel times). * significant if p < 0.05.
DAPmDAPMDRmDRMFywAWDDSMDSFTT
DAPm 0.920.590.720.620.650.820.560.920.50
DAPM0.00 0.290.320.270.090.130.080.220.71
DRm0.040.16 0.100.04 *0.640.740.660.420.35
DRM0.020.140.34 0.01 *0.780.850.940.610.78
Fyw0.040.170.51 *0.69 * 0.930.910.570.380.74
A0.030.380.030.010.00 0.080.090.200.25
WD0.010.300.020.010.000.40 0.00 *0.00 *0.18
DS0.050.400.030.000.050.380.93 * 0.00 *0.23
MDS0.000.200.100.040.110.230.82 *0.83 * 0.23
FTT0.070.020.120.010.020.190.250.200.20
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martinelli, G.; Cervi, F.; Dadomo, A.; Medioli, G. A Preliminary Assessment of Young Water Fractions in Groundwater from Alluvial Aquifers Facing the Northern Italian Apennines. Water 2022, 14, 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040659

AMA Style

Martinelli G, Cervi F, Dadomo A, Medioli G. A Preliminary Assessment of Young Water Fractions in Groundwater from Alluvial Aquifers Facing the Northern Italian Apennines. Water. 2022; 14(4):659. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martinelli, Giovanni, Federico Cervi, Andrea Dadomo, and Gianluca Medioli. 2022. "A Preliminary Assessment of Young Water Fractions in Groundwater from Alluvial Aquifers Facing the Northern Italian Apennines" Water 14, no. 4: 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop