# A Canopy Transpiration Model Based on Scaling Up Stomatal Conductance and Radiation Interception as Affected by Leaf Area Index

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

^{2}= 0.98; p < 0.001) with the predicted values. This was particularly so at lower LAIs. Probable reasons for the discrepancy at higher LAI are explained. Both the predicted and experimental transpiration varied from 0.21 to 0.56 mm h

^{−1}for the range of available LAIs. The physical proportion of the shaded layer exceeded that of the sunlit layer near LAI of 3.0, however, the contribution of the sunlit layer to the total transpiration remains higher throughout the entire growing season.

## 1. Introduction

^{2}= 0.98) when tested at different crop growth stages. The authors concluded that the precision of estimating evapotranspiration and soil evaporation using the “dual-leaf” model was higher than that for the “big-leaf” model and could be an effective substitute for estimating and partitioning evapotranspiration components. However, the model performance was only validated against variable solar radiation, but the impact of variations in canopy coverage or LAI on the magnitude of transpiration was not investigated. Moreover, a single canopy conductance value was calculated for the whole canopy and therefore the potential benefits of assuming a “dual-leaf” configuration was not realized.

## 2. Constructing a Theoretical Model of Canopy Conductance

#### 2.1. Defining the Model Structure

_{b}) in Equation (4). Considering each layer of the canopy as a “big-leaf” in a weighted layer model [8,20] the canopy conductance (g

_{c}) for any of the assumed canopy layers can be written as:

_{s(ab)}= abaxial stomatal conductance (m s

^{−1})

_{s(ad)}= adaxial stomatal conductance (m s

^{−1}), and,

#### 2.2. Modelling Transpiration

_{l}) can be written as:

_{H}and G

_{V}are the total conductance for sensible heat and for water vapour, respectively,

^{−1}),

_{n}= net radiation, (MJ m

^{−2}h

^{−1}),

_{a}= air density, (kg m

^{−3}),

_{p}= specific heat of air, (MJ kg

^{−1}°C

^{−1}),

^{−1}).

_{c}) of the composite canopy can be calculated by combining the adaxial and abaxial stomatal conductances for both the sunlit and shaded layers. In this context, the sensible heat conductance, G

_{H}, (Equation (5)) can be replaced by the surface layer aerodynamic conductance (g

_{a}), and water vapour conductance, G

_{V}, replaced by (1 + g

_{a}/g

_{c}) [3]. A ground heat flux term (G) can also be introduced. The overall canopy evapotranspiration (ET

_{r}) can, therefore, be re-written as [28,30]:

^{−2}h

^{−1}),

_{c}= canopy conductance calculated from stomatal conductance and LAI data, (m s

^{−1}) and

_{a}= aerodynamic conductance, (m s

^{−1}).

_{a}) can be calculated using the following equation:

^{−1}),

_{c}= mean crop height, (m),

_{o}= roughness length of the crop relative to momentum transfer, (m) and

_{o}and d are functions of the mean crop height and can be defined as:

^{−2}s

^{−1}) at the top of the canopy. The constant 0.00173 is the conversion factor used to convert PAR into MJ m

^{−2}h

^{−1}(total radiation energy in all wavelengths), assuming that approximately 45% of the total energy in solar radiation is in the range of 400–700 nm [38,39]. For the sunlit canopy layer, PAR

_{sl}is the measured value at top of the canopy, whereas, for the shaded layer the PAR

_{sh}value is PAR

_{sl}minus the amount that was intercepted by the sunlit portion. The fAPAR

_{LAI}is the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by the canopy for a particular LAI. In the model, this is broken up into sunlit and shaded components of the canopy. By introducing fAPAR, the energy that passes through the canopy and is intercepted by the soil is excluded from the model and therefore excludes the soil evaporation component. For each of the sunlit (sl) and shaded (sh) portions, Equation (6) can be re-written in terms of transpiration, T

_{r}, as:

## 3. Materials and Methods

#### 3.1. Establishing and Monitoring the Growing Environment

^{3}self-watering tubs (surface area = 0.02 m

^{2}). Highly permeable peat river sand potting mix (3:1 v/v) was placed as a 1.5 cm thick base layer to facilitate water infiltration into and out of the soil from the underlying water reservoir. The tubs were then filled to within 3 cm of the top with a cracking clay soil (35% clay, bulk density 0.91 g cm

^{−3}) (vertosol) sourced from the Laureldale Field Station (Figure 2).

^{−1}(approx. 2000 seedlings m

^{−2}) on three sowing dates and with four rates of urea/triple superphosphate fertilizer (0, 33, 66 and 100 kg N ha

^{−1}) to achieve a range of growth rates and vegetation coverage during the growing season. All treatments were randomized.

^{−1}, Electus Distribution Pty. Ltd., Rydalmere, Australia).

#### 3.2. Measuring Canopy Transpiration

^{−1}) was calculated from the amount of water loss (amount required to refill), the time elapsed and the pot surface area.

^{−2}of water loss from the tub surface area.

#### 3.3. Measuring Canopy Conductance

## 4. Results and Discussion

_{cb}). A controlled atmosphere experiment involving the same pasture species (tall fescue), where the transpiration was separately calculated through isotopic observation, found that transpiration can be as high as 0.55 mm hr

^{-1}for an LAI of 4, which is also very close to the model-predicted values in this experiment [31].

^{-1}(which mimics the bulk airflow in the centre of the greenhouse bay resulting from the ventilation), yielded a net increase in modelled transpiration of 20%.

## 5. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Institutional Review Board Statement

## Informed Consent Statement

## Data Availability Statement

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Pieruschka, R.; Huber, G.; Berry, J.A. Control of transpiration by radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
**2010**, 107, 13372–13377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Schlesinger, W.H.; Jasechko, S. Transpiration in the global water cycle. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**2014**, 189, 115–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jarvis, P.; McNaughton, K. Stomatal Control of Transpiration: Scaling Up from Leaf to Region. In Advances in Ecological Research; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986; Volume 15, pp. 1–49. [Google Scholar]
- Penman, H.L. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci.
**1948**, 193, 120–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Priestley, C.H.B.; Taylor, R. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon. Weather Rev.
**1972**, 100, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kool, D.; Agam, N.; Lazarovitch, N.; Heitman, J.; Sauer, T.; Bengal, A. A review of approaches for evapotranspiration partitioning. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**2014**, 184, 56–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ding, R.; Kang, S.; Du, T.; Hao, X.; Zhang, Y. Scaling Up Stomatal Conductance from Leaf to Canopy Using a Dual-Leaf Model for Estimating Crop Evapotranspiration. PLOS ONE
**2014**, 9, e95584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Dai, Y.; Dickinson, R.E.; Wang, Y.-P. A Two-Big-Leaf Model for Canopy Temperature, Photosynthesis, and Stomatal Conductance. J. Clim.
**2004**, 17, 2281–2299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gao, Q.; Zhao, P.; Zeng, X.; Cai, X.; Shen, W. A model of stomatal conductance to quantify the relationship between leaf transpiration, microclimate and soil water stress. Plant Cell Environ.
**2002**, 25, 1373–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shuttleworth, W.J. Putting the “vap” into evaporation. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
**2007**, 11, 210–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Shuttleworth, W.J.; Wallace, J. Evaporation from sparse crops-an energy combination theory. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.
**1985**, 111, 839–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Villalobos, F.J.; Testi, L.; Orgaz, F.; García-Tejera, O.; Lopez-Bernal, A.; González-Dugo, M.V.; Ballester-Lurbe, C.; Castel, J.R.; Alarcón-Cabañero, J.J.; Nicolás-Nicolás, E.; et al. Modelling canopy conductance and transpiration of fruit trees in Mediterranean areas: A simplified approach. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**2013**, 171–172, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Infante, J.; Rambal, S.; Joffre, R. Modelling transpiration in holm-oak savannah: Scaling up from the leaf to the tree scale. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**1997**, 87, 273–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xu, S.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, K.; Ji, X.; Yang, C.; Sudicky, E.A. Simulating canopy conductance of the Haloxylon ammodendron shrubland in an arid inland river basin of northwest China. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**2018**, 249, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - García-Santos, G.; Bruijnzeel, L.; Dolman, A.J. Modelling canopy conductance under wet and dry conditions in a subtropical cloud forest. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**2009**, 149, 1565–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brisson, N.; Itier, B.; L’Hotel, J.C.; Lorendeau, J.Y. Parameterisation of the Shuttleworth-Wallace model to estimate daily maximum transpiration for use in crop models. Ecol. Model.
**1998**, 107, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, X.; Yang, P.; Ren, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Du, J.; Li, P.; Wang, C.; Ren, L. Modeling cherry orchard evapotranspiration based on an improved dual-source model. Agric. Water Manag.
**2010**, 98, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Irmak, S.; Mutiibwa, D.; Irmak, A.; Arkebauer, T.; Weiss, A.; Martin, D.; Eisenhauer, D. On the scaling up leaf stomatal resistance to canopy resistance using photosynthetic photon flux density. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**2008**, 148, 1034–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Campbell, G.S.; Norman, J.M. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, B.; Liu, Y.; Xu, D.; Cai, J.; Li, F. Evapotranspiraton estimation based on scaling up from leaf stomatal conductance to canopy conductance. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**2011**, 151, 1086–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Idso, S.B.; Reginato, R.J.; Jackson, R.D.; Kimball, B.A.; Nakayama, F.S. The three stages of drying of a field soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.
**1974**, 38, 831–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Smith, M.; Raes, D.; Wright, J.L. FAO-56 Dual Crop Coefficient Method for Estimating Evaporation from Soil and Application Extensions. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng.
**2005**, 131, 2–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Zotarelli, L.; Dukes, M.; Morgan, K. Interpretation of Soil Moisture Content to Determine soil Field Capacity and Avoid Over-Irrigating Sandy Soils Using Soil Moisture Sensors; University of Florida Cooperation Extension Services: Gainesville, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Alam, M.S.; Lamb, D.W.; Rahman, M.M. In-situ partitioning of evaporation and transpiration components using a portable evapotranspiration dome—A case study in Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea). Agric. Water Manag.
**2019**, 213, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Alam, M.S.; Lamb, D.W.; Rahman, M.M. A refined method for rapidly determining the relationship between canopy NDVI and the pasture evapotranspiration coefficient. Comput. Electron. Agric.
**2018**, 147, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Er-Raki, S.; Chehbouni, A.; Boulet, G.; Williams, D.G.A. Using the dual approach of FAO-56 for partitioning ET into soil and plant components for olive orchards in a semi-arid region. Agric. Water Manag.
**2010**, 97, 1769–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Al-Kaisi, M.; Brun, L.J.; Enz, J.W. Transpiration and evapotranspiration from maize as related to leaf area index. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**1989**, 48, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Monteith, J.L. Evaporation and environment. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol.
**1965**, 19, 205–234. [Google Scholar] - Eensalu, E.; Kupper, P.; Sellin, A.; Rahi, M.; Sõber, A.; Kull, O.; Kaurilind, E. Do stomata operate at the same relative opening range along a canopy profile of Betula pendula? Funct. Plant Biol.
**2008**, 35, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements-FAO Irrigation and Drainage; Paper 56; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998; Volume 300, p. D05109. [Google Scholar]
- Rothfuss, Y.; Biron, P.; Braud, I.; Canale, L.; Durand, J.-L.; Gaudet, J.-P.; Richard, P.; Vauclin, M.; Bariac, T. Partitioning evapotranspiration fluxes into soil evaporation and plant transpiration using water stable isotopes under controlled conditions. Hydrol. Process.
**2010**, 24, 3177–3194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Katsoulas, N.; Stanghellini, C. Modelling Crop Transpiration in Greenhouses: Different Models for Different Applications. Agronomy
**2019**, 9, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Stanghellini, C. Transpiration of greenhouse crops: An aid to climate management. Ph.D. Thesis, The Institute of Agricultural Engineering (IMAG), Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Prenger, J.J.; Fynn, R.P.; Hansen, R.C. A comparison of four evapotranspiration models in a greenhouse environment. Trans. ASAE
**2002**, 45, 1779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fynn, R.P.; Al-Shooshan, A.; Short, T.H.; McMahon, R.W. Evapotranspiration measurement and modeling for a potted Chrysanthemum crop. Trans. ASAE
**1993**, 36, 1907–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nilson, T. A theoretical analysis of the frequency of gaps in plant stands. Agric. Meteorol.
**1971**, 8, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, L.; LeMeur, R. Effect of aerodynamic resistance on energy balance and Penman-Monteith estimates of evapotranspiration in greenhouse conditions. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**1992**, 58, 209–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Thimijan, R.W.; Heins, R.D. Photometric, radiometric, and quantum light units of measure: A review of procedures for interconversion. HortScience
**1983**, 18, 818–822. [Google Scholar] - Delgado-Bonal, A. Entropy of radiation: The unseen side of light. Sci. Rep.
**2017**, 7, 1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Lu, Y.; Ma, D.; Chen, X.; Zhang, J. A simple method for estimating field crop evapotranspiration from pot experiments. Water
**2018**, 10, 1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Hagishima, A.; Narita, K.-I.; Tanimoto, J. Field experiment on transpiration from isolated urban plants. Hydrol. Process.
**2007**, 21, 1217–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bell, M. Guide to soil measurements for agronomic and physiological research in small grain cereals. Wheat Spec. Rep.
**1993**, 18, 40. [Google Scholar] - Rahman, M.M.; Stanley, J.N.; Lamb, D.W.; Trotter, M.G. Methodology for measuring fAPAR in crops using a combination of active optical and linear irradiance sensors: A case study in Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack). Precis. Agric.
**2014**, 15, 532–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rahman, M.; Lamb, D.W.; Stanley, J. The impact of solar illumination angle when using active optical sensing of NDVI to infer fAPAR in a pasture canopy. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**2015**, 202, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bragg, T.; Webb, N.; Spencer, R.; Wood, J.; Nicholl, C.; Potter, E. User Manual for the Porometer type AP4. Document Code: AP4-UM-3; Delta-T Devices Ltd.: Cambridge, UK, 2004; Volume 4, p. 197. Available online: https://www.delta-t.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/AP4-Porometer-User-Manual-A5-v4.pdf (accessed on 2 October 2019).
- Lantinga, E.A.; Nassiri, M.; Kropff, M.J. Modelling and measuring vertical light absorption within grass–clover mixtures. Agric. For. Meteorol.
**1999**, 96, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhang, L.; Hu, Z.; Fan, J.; Zhou, D.; Tang, F. A meta-analysis of the canopy light extinction coefficient in terrestrial ecosystems. Front. Earth Sci.
**2014**, 8, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pachepsky, L.; Lu, Z.; Reddy, V. Analysis of abaxial and adaxial stomatal regulation in leaves of Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) using the 2DLEAF, two-dimensional model of leaf gas exchange. Biotronics
**2000**, 29, 79–95. [Google Scholar] - Duchemin, B.; Hadria, R.; Er-Raki, S.; Boulet, G.; Maisongrande, P.; Chehbouni, A.; Escadafal, R.; Ezzahar, J.; Hoedjes, J.; Kharrou, M.; et al. Monitoring wheat phenology and irrigation in Central Morocco: On the use of relationships between evapotranspiration, crops coefficients, leaf area index and remotely-sensed vegetation indices. Agric. Water Manag.
**2006**, 79, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Will, R.E.; Wilson, S.M.; Zou, C.B.; Hennessey, T.C. Increased vapor pressure deficit due to higher temperature leads to greater transpiration and faster mortality during drought for tree seedlings common to the forest-grassland ecotone. New Phytol.
**2013**, 200, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Whitehead, D.; Sheriff, D.; Greer, D. The relationship between stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and tracheid structure in Pinus radiata clones grown at different water vapour saturation deficits. Plant Cell Environ.
**1983**, 6, 703–710. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 1.**Schematic representation of the canopy structure for tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea var. Demeter) and the relevant parameters. The proportion of each layer can be theoretically calculated in terms of leaf area index LAI and varies with canopy LAI.

**Figure 4.**Fraction of sunlit (open circles) and shaded (closed circles) components of LAI as a function of canopy LAI.

**Figure 5.**Measured canopy conductance, g

_{c}(mm s

^{−1}) of adaxial (

**△**, dotted trend line) and abaxial (▲, dashed trend line) leaf surfaces, and net canopy conductance (■, solid trend line) as a function of canopy LAI.

**Figure 6.**Measured (■, dotted line), predicted total transpiration (□, solid line), sunlit transpiration (○, long dashed line) and shaded transpiration (●, short dashed line) for the canopy layers and overall canopy with LAI. All trend curves are significant polynomial fits (p < 0.001).

**Figure 7.**Relationship between actual and calculated transpiration (mm h

^{−1}). The dotted line represents 1:1 equivalence and solid line is the fitted linear equation.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Alam, M.S.; Lamb, D.W.; Warwick, N.W.M.
A Canopy Transpiration Model Based on Scaling Up Stomatal Conductance and Radiation Interception as Affected by Leaf Area Index. *Water* **2021**, *13*, 252.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030252

**AMA Style**

Alam MS, Lamb DW, Warwick NWM.
A Canopy Transpiration Model Based on Scaling Up Stomatal Conductance and Radiation Interception as Affected by Leaf Area Index. *Water*. 2021; 13(3):252.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030252

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Alam, Muhammad Shahinur, David William Lamb, and Nigel W. M. Warwick.
2021. "A Canopy Transpiration Model Based on Scaling Up Stomatal Conductance and Radiation Interception as Affected by Leaf Area Index" *Water* 13, no. 3: 252.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13030252