Next Article in Journal
New Insights into the Seasonal Variation of DOM Quality of a Humic-Rich Drinking-Water Reservoir—Coupling 2D-Fluorescence and FTICR MS Measurements
Previous Article in Journal
Copula-Based Infilling Methods for Daily Suspended Sediment Loads
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Projecting Relative Sea Level Rise under Climate Change at the Phrachula Chomklao Fort Tide Gauge in the Upper Gulf of Thailand

Water 2021, 13(12), 1702; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121702
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Water 2021, 13(12), 1702; https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121702
Received: 8 May 2021 / Revised: 9 June 2021 / Accepted: 16 June 2021 / Published: 19 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Oceans and Coastal Zones)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached. Thank you.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript “ Projecting Relative Sea Level Rise Under Climate Change Scenarios in the Upper Gulf of Thailand“ authors: Chirayu Jaroenongard, Mukand S. Babel, Sangam Shrestha, Sutat Weesakul, Vilas Nitivattananon and Dibesh Khadka obtain significant data and is well writed.

In introduction, emphasize the aims of this investigation, and it would be desirable to state that the obtained data will indicate long term (2021-2100) and within it three future periods—near future (2021–243 2050), mid future (2051–2080), and far future (2081–2100).

Small remarks:Small remarks:

Line 4 – after Shrestha insert coma

Line 35 (46) sea level rise – the abbreviation has already been mentioned before (line 12)

Line 15 – GCM – the abbreviation is first time mentioned

Line 41 – please insert reference

Line 111 – the abbreviation DEM what does that mean?

Line 134 – please insert sentence from Line 139 Maeklong, Thachin, Chao Phraya, and Bangpakong Rivers, befor  drains into the GoT. Give the same names for rivers in text and on the map (Fig 1)

Line 369 – this 

Figure 1. Please, mark town Bangkok on map.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors had shown great efforts in addressing the comments made from the previous round of review. I am satisfied with the revised version. One minor issue is to check the ensemble values in Figure 9. It seems to me that the values are not right. For example in Figure 9 (a), the MAEs of the ensemble mean of VS and QM methods are much lower than those of all the individual GCM (i.e. MAEs are all above 50 mm but the ensemble mean is around 50 mm). Similar issue is found in other performance metrics. Please have a check.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop