Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Common Supermarket Products as Positive Controls in Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) Tests
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Kamruzzaman, M., et al. Evaluating the Impact of Climate Change on Paddy Water Balance Using APEX-Paddy Model. Water 2020, 12, 852
Article

Environmental Land Use Conflicts in a Macroscale River Basin: A Preliminary Study Based on the Ruggedness Number

1
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Centro de Ciência do Sistema Terrestre, São José dos Campos, SP 12227-010, Brazil
2
Grupo Política de Uso do Solo, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), s/n, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(5), 1222; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051222
Received: 20 February 2020 / Revised: 5 April 2020 / Accepted: 7 April 2020 / Published: 25 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Water Resources Management, Policy and Governance)
Inadequate land use planning is one of the main driving forces leading to the occurrence of erosion and environmental degradation. The negative impacts of poor planning influence soil physical quality and fertility, agricultural productivity, water quality and availability, biodiversity and other ecosystem services. In some areas, actual land use is not consistent with potential use. When this occurs, the area is termed as being in environmental land use conflict. Many studies have demonstrated the efficiency of the ruggedness number (RN) method for determining land use potential in watersheds. The RN method is simple and can be carried out using geographic information systems (GIS). However, the absence of potential land use or agricultural land suitability assessments is recurrent in territorial management plans or integrated water resources plans (IWRP), especially for macroscale river basins. Therefore, the aim of this preliminary study is to identify possible environmental land use conflicts at the Rio Grande Basin (BHRG), Brazil, using the Ruggedness Number. The results indicate high agricultural use potential and the predominance of appropriate or acceptable soil use at the BHRG. However, class 1, 2 and 3 environmental conflicts were identified in some Rio Grande sub-basins, suggesting greater environmental degradation risks. The findings clearly indicate that more exhaustive studies on environmental quality (soil capability, water, biodiversity) are required at the BHRG, especially in environmental land use conflict areas. We emphasize that this is an important preliminary study which may be carried out in any other macroscale hydrographic basin. View Full-Text
Keywords: soil conservation; land use conflict; river basin management; geographic information system soil conservation; land use conflict; river basin management; geographic information system
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Guidolini, J.; Ometto, J.; Arcoverde, G.; Giarolla, A. Environmental Land Use Conflicts in a Macroscale River Basin: A Preliminary Study Based on the Ruggedness Number. Water 2020, 12, 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051222

AMA Style

Guidolini J, Ometto J, Arcoverde G, Giarolla A. Environmental Land Use Conflicts in a Macroscale River Basin: A Preliminary Study Based on the Ruggedness Number. Water. 2020; 12(5):1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guidolini, Janaína, Jean Ometto, Gustavo Arcoverde, and Angélica Giarolla. 2020. "Environmental Land Use Conflicts in a Macroscale River Basin: A Preliminary Study Based on the Ruggedness Number" Water 12, no. 5: 1222. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12051222

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop