Next Article in Journal
Spatial Differences in the Chemical Composition of Surface Water in the Hornsund Fjord Area: A Statistical Analysis with A Focus on Local Pollution Sources
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Placement of Pressure Sensors Using Fuzzy DEMATEL-Based Sensor Influence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Au/ZnO Hybrid Nanostructures on Electrospun Polymeric Mats for Improved Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants
Open AccessReview

Role of Nanomaterials in the Treatment of Wastewater: A Review

1
School of Chemical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang 11800, Malaysia
2
Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2020, 12(2), 495; https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020495
Received: 27 December 2019 / Revised: 7 February 2020 / Accepted: 8 February 2020 / Published: 12 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Water Treatment with New Nanomaterials)

Abstract

Water is an essential part of life and its availability is important for all living creatures. On the other side, the world is suffering from a major problem of drinking water. There are several gases, microorganisms and other toxins (chemicals and heavy metals) added into water during rain, flowing water, etc. which is responsible for water pollution. This review article describes various applications of nanomaterial in removing different types of impurities from polluted water. There are various kinds of nanomaterials, which carried huge potential to treat polluted water (containing metal toxin substance, different organic and inorganic impurities) very effectively due to their unique properties like greater surface area, able to work at low concentration, etc. The nanostructured catalytic membranes, nanosorbents and nanophotocatalyst based approaches to remove pollutants from wastewater are eco-friendly and efficient, but they require more energy, more investment in order to purify the wastewater. There are many challenges and issues of wastewater treatment. Some precautions are also required to keep away from ecological and health issues. New modern equipment for wastewater treatment should be flexible, low cost and efficient for the commercialization purpose.
Keywords: nanocatalysts; nanomembranes; nanosorbents; nanomaterial applications; waste water treatment; nanomaterial challenges nanocatalysts; nanomembranes; nanosorbents; nanomaterial applications; waste water treatment; nanomaterial challenges

1. Introduction

Water is a natural source on the earth and its availability in pure state is very essential for human beings as well as for other living creatures because the concept of life is unbelievable without water. Water is also called universal solvent due to its potential properties like solubility power etc. Currently, major problem of whole world is water contamination, due to several reasons like inadequate sewage treatment, industrial wastes, marine dumping issues, radioactive waste material, some agricultural perspectives etc. [1,2]. Water pollution has an adverse effect on environment, and it can also responsible for air pollution that reflects very dangerous results on human health. Water pollution also carries an adverse impact on economic growth and socials perspectives of the concern societies/countries. Recently, a UN report stated that purified and freshwater availability is a global issue and become a challenge in 21st century for whole world because the survival of living creatures is not safe with contaminated water [3,4]. Contaminated water means that unwanted materials come into water bodies or reservoirs and make it unsuitable for drinking and other purposes. To overcome this emerging problem, there are many chemical, physical and mechanical methods. Moreover, researchers are still working by exploring different new technologies to improve water purification methods with low cost [5,6]. Newly, emerging field nanotechnology provides a potential offer to purify water with a low expense, high working efficiency in removing pollutants and reusable ability [7]. In past era, nanomaterials are successfully applied to several places like in a field of medical science, catalysis, etc. Recently, when the world facing serious issues of drinking water, experts found that nanomaterial is better option to treat wastewater because it has some unique properties like nano size, large surface area, highly reactive, strong solution mobility [8], strong mechanical property, porosity characters, hydrophilicity, dispersibility and hydrophobicity [9,10,11]. Some heavy metal like Pb, Mo, etc. organic and inorganic pollutants and various harmful microbes are reported to be successfully removed by using different nanomaterials [12,13,14,15,16]. Currently, WHO (World Health Organization) reported that almost 1.7 million people died due to water pollution and four billion cases of different health issues were reported annually due to waterborne diseases [17]. Table 1 indicates different kinds of water pollutants with sources and their adverse effects.
Recently, there are more advance developments occurred in nanomaterials such as nanophotocatalysts, nanomotors, nanomembranes and nanosorbents (Nanosorbents contain high sorption capacity which carries many applications for water treatment methods) and some imprinted polymers are effectively useable for treatment process of contaminated water. In short, the study of nanomaterial applications in water purification is considered to assess positive perspectives [16]. Therefore, we have summarized the role of nanomaterials for wastewater treatment to overcome the water crises in this review article. Nanoengineered materials provide a potential and significant water treatment approaches which can be easily adaptable, but some imperfections still need for further attention which are specially summarized in this article. Moreover, we also addressed the limitations, advantages, disadvantages and future perspectives related to these nanomaterials. Furthermore, the toxicity of nanomaterials and their several applications in wastewater treatment are briefly discussed which might be useful for researcher to plan new strategies.

2. Water Treatment Methodologies

2.1. Nanophotocatalysts

The word “photocatalysis” is composed of two Greek words “photo” and “catalysis” which mean decomposition of compounds in the presence of light. Usually, in scientific world there is no consensus definition for photocatalysis [28]. However, this term can be employed to define a process to activate or stimulate the substance by using light (UV/Visible/Sunlight). Photocatalyst which changes the rate of reaction without any involvement by itself during the chemical transformation process. Furthermore, the key difference between traditional thermal catalyst and photocatalyst is that the prior is activated through heat while the final is activated through photons of light energy [29]. Nanophotocatalysts are commonly used for wastewater purification, as they help to enhance the reactivity of catalyst due to having a greater surface ratio and shape dependent features [30].
The nano size-based materials show different response as compared to bulk materials due to their distinct quantum effects and surface properties. It assists to increase their electric, mechanical, magnetic chemical reactivity and optical properties too [31]. It has been showed that the nanophotocatalysts can expand the oxidation ability due to effective production of oxidizing species at surface of material which helps in degradation of pollutants from the polluted water effectively [32].
Nanoparticles like zero-valence based metal, semiconductor and some bimetallic type etc. are mostly used for treatment of environmental pollutants e.g., azo dyes, Chlorpyrifos [33,34,35], organochlorine pesticides, nitroaromatics, etc. [36]. There are also several reports in literature which illustrated that TiO2 based nanotubes can effectively be used in removal of pollutants (organic pollutants such as azo dyes, Congo red, phenol aromatic base pollutants, toluene, dichlorophenol trichlorobenzene, chlorinated ethene, etc.) from waste water [37,38,39,40,41]. However, the most common and significant metal oxide nanophotocatalyst are SiO2, ZnO, TiO2, Al2O3, etc. [42,43,44]. Among them, Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is one of excellent photocatalyst from all existing material due to its several reasons such as low cost, toxic free property, chemical stability, and its easy availability on earth. Moreover, TiO2 exist in three natural states, anatase, rutile, and brookite. So far, anatase considered as good nanophotocatalyst material [45]. The bandgap of this state is 3.2 eV and it can absorb ultraviolet light (below 387 nm) [46]. However, other photocatalysts like ZnO have also been produced to eliminate contaminants in wastewater and presents reusable ability effectively [47,48,49,50,51]. In case of composite nanomaterial, the degradation of reference substance (dimethyl sulfoxide) for evaluating the photocatalytic performance of water treatment by using CdS/TiO2 composite as catalyst under the irradiation of visible light also investigated [52]. The iron doped nanomaterials have ferromagnetism ability which helps to recycle and reuse it easily [53,54,55,56]. Similarly, due to some characteristics like high photocatalytic reactivity Pd incorporated ZnO nanomaterial have been used for the removal of Escherichia coli from wastewater [57]. Although, new efforts have been targeted on metal oxides in order to increase the photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation through modifying them with other elements like metals or metal ions [6,33] carbonaceous-based materials, dye sensitizers [58] and many others but still there is a need for further modifications in nanophotocatalysts.
Furthermore, nanophotocatalysis process may occur in two states heterogeneously or homogeneously. The most intensively studied state is heterogeneous nanophotocatalysis in modern era, due to its wide scope in water decontamination and environmental related applications. In case of heterogeneous photocatalysis, it implies the prior development of an interface between fluid (both reactants and products of reaction) and solid photocatalyst (such as metal or semiconductor) [59,60]. Generally, the word “heterogeneous photocatalysis” is mostly employed where a light-based semiconductor photocatalysts are used, which is in interaction with gaseous or liquid phase [61]. The heterogeneous photocatalysis based applications are strongly depend on the scaled-up reactor based on advance developed designs with improved efficiency [62]. The major task in reactor designing is effective illumination of nanocatalyst and mass transfer optimization, particularly in case of liquid phase. The transfer of photon can be improved by using light-emitting diodes and optical fibres, but productive revolutions in this field are still lacking. Moreover, an extensive effort has been focused toward the progress of solar photoreactors [63,64,65]. According to literature, the positive role of nanophotocatalyst has been demonstrated in research laboratory for air cleaning and water treatment. At the commercial level it is still not a perfect way to minimize the problem. Moreover, the present lack of extensive commercial applications is due to absence of effective photoreactor configurations and lower photocatalytic competence of photocatalysts. Despite all, heterogeneous nanophotocatalyst recommend fascinating advantages i.e., inexpensive usage of chemicals, additive free, work even at lower concentration, chemical stability (e.g., TiO2 stable in aqueous medium) [66]. Therefore, recently heterogeneous photocatalysis is achieving the pre-industrial scale.

2.1.1. Advantage and Disadvantages of Nanophotocatalyst

Nanophotocatalysis has reflected a vital role for the mineralization of dangerous organic substances at 25 °C and proved very effective and efficient method for detoxification of water with help of nanophotocatalysts [67]. Furthermore, mostly nanophotocatalysts show some advantages such as they are less toxic, having low-cost, chemically stable, easily accessible and excellent photoactive properties with nano size i.e., 1–100 nm range [68]. Generally, nanophotocatalysts present various advantages such as stability (chemical/physical), low cost and eco-friendliness. Among them, TiO2 having good photostability but many nanophotocatalysts, such as zinc oxide, metal sulfide materials, copper-based materials, and so on exhibit relatively low chemical stability due to photocorrosion [69]. As light shine on them, they oxidized or reduced depend on materials and their oxidation states changes by generating holes or electrons, which leads to decomposition of photocatalysts and decreases the efficiency of photocalatalysts. Therefore, there is a strong need to synthesize a nano composite in order to achieve stable photocatalysts for long-time performance.
The major advantage of nano-sized is related to quantum-size effect, which enhance the energy bandgap and reduce the particle size [70]. Moreover, as a process photodegradation also have several advantages such as low cost, reusable, and generally complete degradation. In addition to all of the developments, still nanophotocatalyst facing some issues i.e., toxicity and recovery of catalysts from mixture. These type of issues limits the applications and scope of nanophotocatalyst at higher level [71]. So, the scientific community is now focusing others nanocomposite of different material which can reduce the toxicity while using in water treatment process. So, it is suggestible for the scholar community to synthesize new photocatalysts which can work in visible ranges for sustainable result and promote the doped photocatalyst with different material such as graphene and its derivatives to reduce the toxicity effect. To overcome the catalyst recovery drawback, one significant approach could be used i.e., magnetic nanophotocatalysts in wastewater treatment. When magnetic nanophotocatalysts are used, the recovery of catalyst can be achieved through external magnetic fields, therefore, permitting the many recycling of nanocatalyst and achieved more effective and naturally responsive water decontamination processes. Furthermore, the approach regarding nanophotocatalysis for removal of pollutants from water has been described as a very effective approach and some unique applications of nanophotocatalysts are shown in Figure 1.

2.1.2. Future Perspectives of Nanophotocatalyst

A wide research on nanomaterials is ongoing in field of nanophotocatalysis which led to few progress in reactor designing and developments regarding the modifications in nanophotocatalysts. Although many developments in nanophotocatalytic materials occurred, still some important inquiries required related to characteristics of nanophotocatalytic materials. The major challenges in intensification process is mass transfer limitations and higher consumption of photons [72]. The concept of nanocomposites is ideal in solving the electron pair recombination problem which can be prolonged by combining the nanocomposites with nanophotocatalytic reactor structures. The new modern reactors are known as microfluidic reactors which open a new door for intense characteristics study in reaction phase and synthesis phase. Microfluidic reactors are those reactors which are working on micro level with reactants [73,74]. The key features of micro-reactors are large surface-to-volume ratio, improved diffusion effect and great mass transfer coefficient factor, highly stable hydrodynamics, less Reynold’s flow, and informal handling which makes them more ideal material than conventional reactors. However, still it is difficult for photocatalysis to apply on large scale in actual wastewater.
Moreover, the synthesis of significant structures such as nanorod, nanosphere, nanoflowers, nanoflakes and nanocones with enhanced functional and structural properties could be opened an extensive area of study. Several structures of nanomaterials with potential properties could be produced through the measured synthesis approaches. However, the future research, should be explored by producing new photocatalysts. The synthesis of novel nanophotocatalysts with excellent efficiency, inexpensive, eco-friendly and high stability is crucially needed. Moreover, to exploit pollutant treatment effectively, several approaches should be joint with sensible match, such as electrocatalysis, photocatalysis, adsorption and several thermodynamics processes. The preparation of nanocomposites in the presence of ZnO, TiO2 was well explored in early decades for the treatment of water pollutants. The nanocomposites preparation by using carboneous material, polymer and ceramic materials are still in initial stage. It can generate ideal nanocomposites with improved properties. The heterogeneous photocatalytic for wastewater remediation is inhibited by some main technical problems that need to be study effectively. Finally, a significant photocatalytic treatment with better solar-driven, excellent efficacy and less site area requirements can be comprehended in future with fast assessment.

2.1.3. Photocatalytic Degradation and Mineralization Pathway

Nanomaterials also got much attention in degradation as well as mineralization of toxic organic pollutants due to having remarkable physiochemical properties. In photocatalysis, there are two types of processes that occur, namely mineralization and degradation of organic pollutants [5,75]. In the process of degradation, the organic pollutants are splitting or decomposed into several products while in the case of mineralization, the complete destruction of organic pollutant took place into water, carbon dioxide and some inorganic ions. The possible pollutant degradation mechanism in the presence of light is shown in Figure 2 [75]. Briefly, a semiconductor like TiO2 absorbs the light which is greater or equal to TiO2 band gap width, it carries to electron–hole pairs (e–h+). If the separation of charge is continued, the electron–hole may travel to the surface of catalyst where they contribute with sorbed species in redox reactions. Particularly, h+vb react with water (surface-bound) to generate the hydroxyl radicals and simultaneously ecb selected by oxygen to produce the radical anion (superoxide radicals) as designated below in equations.
TiO 2   +   h ν     e c b +   h + v b        
O 2 +   e c b     O 2
H 2 O   +   h + v b     OH +   H +
After pollutant degradation by using nanomaterials in the presence of light, HPLC-MS or GC-MS was employed to analysis the produced degraded products. Here, it is necessary to confirm regarding the obtained degradation products, whether these products are more toxic or less toxic as compared to parent compound using toxicity test.
As discussed above, mineralization concept is actually synonymous of complete photodegradation. It defines the degradation of a compound into CO2 and H2O. Sometimes others minerals also released during mineralization of compounds such as sulphate, ammonia, sulphite, fluoride, sulphide, chloride, phosphate, nitrite, etc. [76]. Generally, the rate of mineralization is less as compared to degradation, probably due to generation of stable intermediate during process. Therefore, it is supposed that a long irradiation is compulsory for entire removal of total organic carbon (TOC). Moreover, the mineralization concept is avoiding the generation of undesirable products is the excellent mode to degrade the organic compounds. The TOC is defined as the total quantity of bounded carbons in any organic compound and measured by TOC analyser. The possible mechanism of pollutant mineralization is shown in Figure 2 coupled with photodegradation mechanism.
For example, different degradation products as well as the mineralization products of Lignocaine are shown in Figure 3 as follows [77];

2.2. Nano- and Micromotors

Nanotechnology, an area of research that has progressive at such a quick pace in early decades and offered many approaches for water treatment. In modern era, nano/micromotors have been considered that can convert the energy from several resources into machine-driven force, empowering them to achieve special goals through various mechanisms. These innovative motors are motorized in both cases by using fuel or without fuel sources (acoustics, magnetic field, electric field) have several significant exciting applications [78]. They show more speed, high power, specific control movement, self-mix ability, etc. The removal of contaminant from polluted resources is a significant focus for environmental stability and sustainability [79]. The trend of water purification and its treatment has grown quickly throughout the world because of high demands for pure water resources and novel water superiority regulations. A large variety of approaches are used earlier for removal of pollutants from polluted groundwater, fresh water, sediments wastewater, etc. Different mechanisms employed by nano/micromotors for treatment of water pollutants are graphically shown in Figure 4 and some environmental applications of nano/micromotors are shown in Table 2 with their mechanism.
Traditional treatment Processes are inadequate through diffusion and, hence, entail outward agitation to stimulate the wastewater treatment process. Though, nano/micromotors could possibly overwhelmed the diffusion boundary by energetic mixing due to their self-propulsion competences. These self-propelled nano/micromotors expressively stimulate the water treatment efficiency through water decontamination efficiency, merging with materials nano/microstructure i.e., greater surface area and working activities [80,81,82,83]. Moreover, nano/micromotors can go in nano/microscale detentions in the presence of a magnetic field, serving as programmed cleaners, where conventional approaches are not actively working. However, most positive concept for nano/micromotors in term of wastewater decontamination depends on fuels as shown in Table 3. There is problem, this condition reduced the working potential of nanomotors in biological applications. Although some photocatalytic, biocatalytic and magnetically driven nano/micromotors have been industrialized, still there are some challenges in order to apply nano/micromotors for water treatment in future.

2.2.1. Advantage and Disadvantages of Nano- and Micromotors

Recently, nano/micromotors are used to overcome the environmental issues such as water pollutant treatment and environmental sensing/monitoring. The nano/micromotor are considered as excellent option, because the reactive nano-based materials have potential properties which make it more efficient to convert toxic pollutants into toxic free. Nanomachines offer different advantages as compare to traditional remediation agents. The small machines improve a dimension which based on decontamination approaches, lead to in-situ and ex-situ nano-remediation rules, and have ability to decrease the clear-out time and entire cost [112]. Specifically, the constant movement of nanoscale substances can be utilized for transferring reactive nanomaterials for water purification through polluted samples, for discharging remediation agents to long distances, and for communication of important mixing throughout decontamination processes [113]. Existing technologies are insufficient for fulfilling the demand in term of scaling up, as stated in the treatment of polluted water, therefore more efforts are required. Some issues require to be explained prior to move toward applied application at commercial level. For example, the lifecycle of multi-functional nano/micromotors is restricted to the residual materials in its physique that were consumed in locomotion or oxidation reactions. Another disadvantage is poisoning of Pt layer because the compounds present in wastewater can bond chemically to other surface-active sites of the catalyst, or great viscosity-based wastewater which hinder the movement of micromotors [114]. The introduction of novel development in nano/micromotors will offer countless environmental treatment possibilities to achieve more multifaceted and challenging operations.

2.2.2. Future Perspectives of Nano- and Micromotors

Nano/micromotor are still considered as immature techniques because it still on initial stages but this topic open a new door of research for researcher. As Compared with other traditional wastewater treatment approaches, this subject is still novel and but has a lot of restrictions in extensive and real-world applications. Despite all, current approaches are insufficient to fulfil the current demand in scaling up the technique described in water pollutant treatment, therefore considerable work is still required [115]. Novel materials should link with nano/micro-motors, such as graphene to treat wastewater. These kinds of materials show better performance in wastewater treatment as compared with other materials. Moreover, some new mechanism should functionalize in nanomotor design for better results. Soon, we believe that excellent nanomotor will be planned by associating with other approaches. These predictable new, novel micro/nanomotors would ultimately develop the ecological monitoring and wastewater treatment technologies, from a struggle to advance the class of life.

2.3. Nanomembranes

Nanomembranes are a unique type of membrane formed with different nanofibers which are employed to eliminate unwanted nanoparticles present in aqueous phase. Using this technique, the process takes places at a very high elimination speed with condensed fouling propensity and it also served as a pre-treatment process which is used for reverse osmosis [116]. There are many reported studies on membrane nanotechnology in order to produce multifunction membrane by using different nanomaterial substance in different polymers-based membranes. Water porous membrane for water treatment did nanofiltration, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, etc. The membrane contains a porous support with composite layer. Typically, the considerable composite layer is carbon-based material (graphene oxide/CNT) dispersed into polymer matrix for significant practice. This provide promising and significant progresses in fouling resistance and aqueous transport. For example, CNTs hold anti-microbial properties that can minimize fouling, biofilm formation and it can also reduce the chance of mechanical failures [117]. The doping process of nanomaterial (zeolite, alumina, TiO2, etc.) into polymer ultra-filtration membranes show the formation of amplified membrane on surface of hydrophilicity and fouling resistance [118,119,120]. The antimicrobial material like silver metal particles are also doped with a polymer to produce polymeric membrane to prevent attachment of bacteria and inhibit biofilm production on surface of membrane [121,122]. It served to inactivate viruses and it has also ability to prevent the biofouling of membrane [123]. The production and growth of nanomaterial thin film are incorporated into active thin film composite through doping in surface modification. Usually, there are a few major challenges in nanomembrane i.e., membrane clogging and membrane fouling. Therefore, it is a need to overcome this problem. By the addition of super hydrophilic nanoparticles in making a thin film nanocomposite membrane, the prevention from clogging and fouling could be checked. Furthermore, metal oxide nanoparticles (Al2O3, TiO2), antimicrobial nanoparticles (nano silver, CNTs) and aquaporin-based membranes are very useful material to overcome the membrane clogging and fouling issue due to having high hydrophilicity, high porosity, better fouling resistance and a better homogenous nanopore. Generally, nanoparticles affect the selectivity and permeability of a membrane which depends upon the sort, quantity, dimension, etc. of nanoparticles. Moreover, there are many biological membranes present with highly permeable and selective ability [124,125] Nanomembranes are also used for wastewater treatment due to having several properties that make this material more prolific, these are high uniformity, homogeneity ability, optimization, short time required, easily handled and contain much order of reaction [126]. There are some nano photocatalysts which can be introduced in the nanocomposite membrane to make fit it for the degradation of organic pollutants. For example, TiO2 incorporated nanomembranes and films are effectively used to deactivate different microorganisms and degrade the organic pollutants [127]. The developments and progressive growth of nanotechnology especially in nanomaterial produced several nanostructured catalytic membranes which contain novel properties like improved selectivity, high decomposition rate, and larger foul resistance [128,129]. In order to synthesize these types of nanomaterials, there were many approaches used to produce it with multi-functionality features [130]. The incorporation of nanostructured catalytic materials like iron-catalysed based free radical and enzymatic catalysis within pore membrane showed a constructive progress in this technology. Therefore, it possible to carry out oxidative reactions for removal of pollutants and detoxification of water without use of any toxic chemicals. To prove the efficiency of nanostructured catalytic membrane in industrial/commercial applications, immobilized membrane nanoparticle (ferrihydrite/iron oxide) reaction was carried out with hydrogen peroxide to make free radicals’ ions for removal of chlorinated based organic pollutant in real groundwater. The development of nanostructured materials is still very useful in many other environmental applications [131]. There were several reported studies of metallic nanoparticles immobilization on membrane (e.g., chitosan, cellulose acetate, polysulfones, etc.) for dichlorination, degradation of a toxic substance which contains novel properties such as, hindrance of nanoparticles, high reactivity, absence of agglomeration and surface reduction [132,133]. Palladium acetate and polyetherimide both are used to prepare nanocomposite films and a novel type interaction is present among hydrogen and Pd nanoparticles in order to improve water treatment efficiency [134]. In situ and ex-situ methods are also used to produce nanomaterials within the matrix with precursor film under many conditions [135,136,137]. This offers many opportunities to produce nanomaterial with tunable properties. Moreover, the developments of nanotechnology are also responsible to produce many significant catalytic membranes with high selectivity, better permeability and high resistance fouling. Modern methods contain hybrid and bottom-up approaches for empowering its multi-functionality characteristics in the field of wastewater treatment [138].

2.3.1. Advantage and Disadvantages of Nanomembrane

The main objective of using membranes in case of drinking water is to separate the toxic particles from water resources. The nanomembrane filters were also used to measure the water safety level [139]. The advantages of nano membrane as compared to traditional approaches for filtration is that; in traditional approaches of filtration, throughout the entire process, calcium and magnesium required another ion to compensate, therefore mostly Na+ ions are served as an exchanger but in case of nanomembrane, there will be no need [139,140]. Nanomembranes limitations are usually reducing its efficiency compared to other conventional approaches. The first one is fouling of nanomembrane which comes after using the membrane few times. It is the major issue, which make this approach more expensive and inefficient. Fouling problems occur in the nanomembrane because it entirely depends on working conditions, sometime the working conditions are not appropriate such as over temperature, pressure, and optimization is also considered as responsible for membrane fouling [141]. Second major limitation is membrane stability. The nanomembrane could not keep the stability for long period. After sometimes, the stability start reducing its efficiency and it does not give excellent outcomes as earlier. So, there will be a need for changing the nanomembrane to get excellent results, but this will cause several other issues such as high cost, impurity chances during changing process, etc. [142]. The stability is depending on the essential chemical resistance which apply for material cleansing. The disadvantages are less reliability, slow operation process, less selectivity, high maintenance cost and working efficiency reduce with passage of time. There are some common disadvantages that is why it is not extensively explored [143]. Some nanomembranes types are summarized in Table 4 along with their advantage and disadvantage and applications.

2.3.2. Future Perspectives of Nanomembranes

Nanomembranes separate the inorganic ions, organic, nanoparticles viruses-based pollutants from water resources through solution using diffusion and size exclusion. Though these described nanomembranes are proved effectively at the research laboratory level, upscaling to lower cost, but making them ideal for industrial scale is still emerging as a challenge. To cross this barrier toward productive upscaling, the commercialization objective needs a joint collaboration struggle through research institutions and manufacturing companies. The selectivity of nanomembrane should be improved, secondly upgrade the nanomembrane resistivity to avoid membrane fouling. Surface grafting-based polymers like zwitterionic may be a significant candidate for the development of new generation membranes. Surface grafting, though, would not report fouling resistance to inner walls pore [149]. Thereafter, the prime of other appropriate anti-fouling convertors fixed into the membrane matrix that will be vital. It is also very significant to improve the high sensitivity of polyamide membranes to many types of oxidants like ozone and chlorine. Furthermore, the multi-functional membranes fabrication requires a significant attention for better innovation at industrial scale. However, still there are several challenges to be solve for manufacturing production of lower cost and effective nanomembranes for water treatment.

2.4. Nanosorbents

Nanosorbents hold wide properties like high sorption capability that make the nanosorbents more appropriate and powerful for water treatment [150]. These nanosorbents are very rare in commercial form but researcher and experts doing a lot of work on it to produce nanosorbents in larger quantity/at commercial level [151]. The most commonly reported nanosorbents are based on carbon (e.g., carbon black, graphite, graphene oxide). Furthermore, metal/metal oxide and polymeric nanosorbents were also exist [152]. The composite of different material like Ag/polyaniline, Ag/carbon, C/TiO2, etc. carrying huge significant importance in order to reduce the effect of toxicity in the wastewater treatment process. The carboneous material such as CNTs with a cylindrical form nano structure may present as single-walled and multiwalled nanotubes depending on the method of synthesizes. CNTs hold measurable adsorption sites and due to high surface area, they hold sustainable surfaces. It must be stabilized to prevent from aggregation that decreases the surface-active sites because CNTs has hydrophobic surface properties. So, it is an efficient material for the pollutants by adsorbing process. Similarly, the polymeric nanoadsorbents like dendrimers are functional for eliminating organic pollutants and heavy metals from wastewater [153]. For example, copper ions were reduced with the help of dendrimer-ultrafiltration system [154]. They simply regenerated by shifting of pH effect and show biocompatibility, biodegradability, and toxic free environment. Furthermore, the removal percent of dyes or others organic pollutants is almost 99% [155]. Another important nanosorbent is zeolites, which have an absorbent structure in which several nanoparticles like copper, silver ions can be implantable [156]. The advantage of zeolites is to control the amount of metals and it also served as anti-microbial agent [157]. Moreover, the magnetic nanosorbents have play vital role in water treatment and a unique tool to remove different organic pollutants from water [158]. Some organic containments are also removed by using magnetic filtration. Magnetic separation nanosorbents are synthesized by ligands coating with magnetic nanoparticles at specific affinity [159]. There were many methods like ion exchange, cleaning agents, magnetic forces, etc. reported to regenerate these nanosorbents. These regenerated nanosorbents have the ability of being cost-effective and more promotions of commercialization. Despite all, the carbon has some health risks. The reported studies demonstrated that toxic effect is depends on morphology of nanoadsorbents, chemical stabilizers and surface modifications [160,161]. So, there is a need to give an attention to synthesize more stable morphology (size and shape) to overcome the toxicity issues as well as health risks. Furthermore, the bioadsorbents have the properties of high biodegradable, good biocompatible and nontoxicity which could be replaceable with chemically synthesized nanosorbents. The graphene oxide is suggestable to scientific community because it is very emerging nanomaterial to use as nanosorbents to remove pollutant and it can give better result than others due to its superior properties. There are some reported nanosorbents and their functions as shown in Table 5.

Advantages, Disadvantages and Future Perspectives of Nanosorbents

The role of nanomaterials as sorbents in explaining ecological issues such as decontamination of wastewater received a great interest due to having remarkable physiochemical properties. These properties distinguish them in several fields as compare to conventional traditional sorbents. For an ideal sorbent to treat the pollutant very effectively in a short time, it should hold large surface area, excellent rate of adsorption, short time adsorption and equilibrium times. Similar to nanosorbents, nanomaterials got interest because of having nano-size which can hold excellent rate of adsorption with short time. Furthermore, nanosorbents that can be used as a separation medium in water decontamination to eliminate the organic, inorganic-based pollutants from polluted water are nanoparticles [170]. Literature review shows that a lot of efforts are already done for wastewater treatment and used nanomaterials as sorbent for efficient results. Some challenges are required to be addressed entirely for commercialisation purpose of the nano-size sorbents for water decontamination such as production scalability, as well as excellent adsorption measurements, selectivity, stability of material, operational duration of material, etc. However, there is an enormous need for an active approach to treat the wastewater and fabricate some new nanosorbents which could be applied to control toxic ions and compounds from wastewater [171]. The future prospects looking admirable, as scientific community working on advances knowledge and improving the adsorption mechanisms. In the modern world, researchers, consultants and officials are concerned about wastewater pollutant which holds health risks and they all are dedicated to find an effective explanation as concerning the nanomaterials should be used at industrial scale.

3. Self-Toxicity of Nanomaterials

Nowadays, nanomaterials have become most attractive and widely used material for different applications in various fields such as electronics, medicine, agriculture, wastewater treatment plants, energy generations and other sciences. These nanomaterials are doped metal oxides, doped carbon nanotubes (single and double walled), nanosorbents, etc. There were many reports available in literature which show that these nanomaterials served as a leading role in order to remove different pollutants from waste waters [172]. In addition to their importance, utilities and applications in different fields, especially in water treatment process, it is very important to know about their self-toxicity effects. There are studies which show the toxicity effect of few nanomaterials, as shown in Table 6. Moreover, few metal oxides show some toxic character at high and some, even at low concentrations [173,174]. Furthermore, the toxicity of CNTs is depending on different properties like length, surface area, distribution ratio, aggregation degree, initial concentration of material [175]. Furthermore, single walled CNTs are less toxic as compared to double walled [176]. They are associated for pulmonary inflammation, oxidative stress, granuloma in lungs, basic inflammation, apoptosis and fibrosis [177]. Similarly, in case of TiO2, the toxicities of different composition ratio of TiO2 depend upon initial concentration and time. Generally, it is considered as non-toxic even at a higher concentration for 24 h [178]. Currently, the studies by scientific communities on these nanomaterials are ongoing to see the toxic and side effects and try to find out the mechanisms with a focus on explaining the outlines of nanomaterials transport, degradation, elimination, accumulation, etc. Furthermore, nanomaterials can harm body through various sources. Therefore, there is a critical need to find out the effects of nanoparticles on health.

4. Applications of Nanomaterials

There were many opportunities to use engineered/modified nanomaterial for water treatment and many other industrial fields. Currently, nanomaterial attracts more attention of researcher in the field of wastewater treatment. The study trend in the field of nanomaterials is increasing day by day as we can observe through previously reported data. The number of publications in nanomaterial was less than 5% in 2005 but in 2019 number of reported works is more than 80% as shown in Figure 5 [184].
With emerging several aspects of nanomaterials, the wider environmental water resources effects are also considered. Such attentions might contain models to measure the significant advantages of reduction or inhibition of contaminants from engineering sources. Nanoscience expertise holds excellent potential for constant improvement for environmental protection. The present article has presented more indication to this matter and it has a response to what are the significant environmental impacts of this nanotechnology. For a quick assessment, the summary of nanomaterial applications for treatment of pollutants from water resources are briefly summarized in Table 7 [185].
(1).
Nanomaterials are very efficient in removing arsenic from drinking water when titanium nanoparticles and exchange based resin material impregnated with iron hydroxide material. The researcher also studied that titanium served as an adsorbent to remove arsenic from water present in packed bed reactor setting. In some developed countries, iron oxide is used as coated sand to remove arsenic from drinking water [186].
(2).
Different nanomaterial like magnetic and carbon nanotubes can be served as sensor components due to having remarkable physical, electrical and chemical properties. Therefore, these sensors may offer opportunity to monitor water quality. Nanomaterial-based sensor is used to detect different pollutants because there have optical properties that make sensor more selective and sensitive to detect the pollutants [187].
(3).
Recently, WHO reported that almost 783 million populations are suffering from fresh drinking water. Boschi-Pinto et al. stated that children deaths ratio of nearly 1.87 million is only due to water diseases [188]. Few conventional techniques are not suitable in underdeveloped countries because high investment is required for this project for maintenance expenses, and many other problems. Furthermore, generally people carry their water from another area and then save it for many days because there is no proper supply of drinking water. During collection and transport of water, there are chances of water contaminations. An efficient method of ceramic water filters (CWFs) provides an offer to treat these kinds of water infections (pathogens). Recently, CWFs are equipped by firing and pressing of flammable material and clay with silver nanoparticles [189]. The filter is produced by pressure and then dried air fired in a kiln. Therefore, a ceramic material produces filtered or clean water but by using this process removal is not possible up to high level. Silver doped nanomaterials could be used to get a higher percentage of pathogen’s removal from water due to having antimicrobial properties. Ag solutions are used by brushing on CWF. It was observed that 80% of CWFs industries used Ag nanoparticles doped with some other materials. The Ag nanoparticles give remarkable results in order to remove different pathogens from drinking waters [190].
(4).
Water pollutants are responsible for environmental pollutions. The polymer-based nanomaterial helps in environmental protection. Reported studies show that the purification of water using polymer material could be attained by nanoclay incorporation. The hydrophobicity enhancement helps to promote nanocomposite properties. Applications in contact with moist environments clearly indicate benefits from nanomaterial incorporation of nanoclay particles [191].
(5).
The research is on the way to produce nanosorbents for different metals and organic compounds. Nanomaterial can act as sorbents like carbon nanotubes, zeolites and self-assembly layers on mesoporous supports, which control mesoporous ceramics with a sorbent that indicate efficient removal process of metals and anions from drinking water [192].
(6).
Some nanomaterial has high antimicrobial activity properties. This type of material includes AgNPs, fullerene, TiO2, CNT based nanocomposite, etc. and they contain several properties like mild oxidant, inertness to water and produce safe by-products [193].
(7).
Now a days, many pollutants are present in water resources such as organics-based substances and even they present in trace amount which are very dangerous for human health. Usually, the chlorination and flocculation processes are used for removing water pollutants. There are some drawbacks in these conventional filtrations processes. These kinds of systems show less efficiency to remove pollutants entirely and also produces some sludge in water recourses which also creates big issues in environment pollution [194]. Therefore, to keep safe from sludge nanomembranes, it was employed because it does not allow any solid particle to pass into water and reduce the chances of sludge production in water resources. This reason makes nanomembrane more prominent in market than other methods. Certainly, some improvements are required to make it completely perfect technique.
(8).
Metal oxides nanoparticles also play a very good role as catalyst in different oxidation reactions. They show strong catalytic reactivity towards pollutant molecules and change these pollutants into environmentally suitable products [195,196]. Some unique properties are present of these nanomaterials like nano size, high reactivity and greater surface area. Specially, TiO2 photocatalysis plays a vital role in removing different impurities from surface water as shown in Figure 6.
The summary/mechanism of pollutant removal by using TiO2 nanoparticles as nanophotocatalyst is shown in Table 8.
(9). Different types of pollutants such as organic pesticides, organic dyes, pharmaceutical drugs, etc. are photodegraded by many researchers under several conditions such as choice of UV or Visible light, doped nanoparticles or undoped, metal/non-metal doping, etc. According to literature, as shown in Table 9 indicate clearly that modified or doped form of TiO2 can give better results especially in photodegradation of pollutants. Table also demonstrates that the efficiency of doped-TiO2 in visible light showed better results as compared to UV light.

5. Nanomaterial Challenges for Water Treatment

Currently, the emerging nanomaterial possesses some challenges in the field of wastewater treatment [206,207]. Nanomaterial provides several possibilities of treatment of wastewater and they contain different kinds of substances which are distinct on the basis of the particles morphology. The developments regarding the commercial applications of nanomaterial is too quick and production of nanomaterial is increasing at a global level [58,208]. Nanomaterials are used for purification of polluted water through different methods such as photocatalytic, adsorption, and nanosorbents [209,210]. These methods need some modifications to work more effectively. Moreover, understanding of risk pretended by nanotechnology has not improved as quickly as research has giving possibilities to different applications of nanomaterials. The major challenge is the lack of information about the nanomaterial and how nanomaterials are released into environment, how they travel into water, how they start to exist in water [196]. Another challenge is related to human health because these types of material have some adverse effects/toxicological effect. The reported studies show that nanomaterials may cause some health issues but still research is going on. It is not easy to give a conclusion and ongoing research requires some conducting experiments at appropriate concentrations and more about toxicological studies. The membrane process is also effectively used wastewater treatment but there were very few reported studied about this process. The major challenge is the use of the membrane for fouling process and water treatment because after performing work/filtration, their pores may block, and the efficiency starts to decrease. In case of nanosorbents, the reusability is the main drawback, so there is need to synthesize such types of nanomaterials which can efficiently remove the pollutants from wastewater and after that the recovery process of these nanosorbents should be very easy. The United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) found some basic challenges in order to remove nanoparticles using a process of water treatment [210,211,212,213]. (a) What is the mechanism of removing nanoparticles from wastewater? (b) What is the effect of nanoparticles on other waste substances during wastewater treatment? (c) How coagulation, carbon adsorption, etc. methods are effective in working. Moreover, water contains some pollutants and after treatment by the above mentioned methods, they degrade or are decomposed. There is a basic need to design an experiment for finding the intermediate products during these processes. Furthermore, constant development in methodology is needed to evaluate nanomaterials with low cost and it should be appropriate for complex nanomaterials.

6. Conclusive Remarks and Future Perspectives

Water distinguishes and makes our planet superior as compared to other planets. Though the worldwide available supply of pure water is high to meet all existing and predictable water demands. There are several areas where the drinking water resources are insufficient to fulfil the basic, economic and domestic developmental needs. In such areas, the insufficient fresh water to fulfil human water need and sanitation requirements is certainly a limit on human health and for other living creatures. Scientific community/research institutes must find a path to eliminate these limitations. Moreover, the world is facing several challenges in doing that, especially given a fluctuating and undefined future environment, a fast-rising population that is driving enlarged community and financial growth, urbanization and globalization. How superlatively overcomes on these challenges which entails exploration in all features of water management. The trend of nanomaterial for water pollutant treatment is rapidly increasing in this modern era due to very horrible conditions of water and demand for fresh water in the whole world. There is an important need for innovative progressive water treatment approaches, in specific to certify a high class of water for drinking purpose, remove micro/macro pollutants and increase industrial production developments through flexibly modifiable water treatment approaches. Nanotechnology has proved great achievement for controlling water purification challenges and makes some future advancement. Nanomaterial approaches like nanosorbents, nanostructured catalytic membranes, etc. are very efficient, less time required, less energy and eco-friendly techniques but all these methods are not cheap, and they are not used yet for commercial purpose to purify the wastewater at a large scale.
Nanomaterials show high efficiency due to having high rate of reaction. However, there are still some weaknesses that must be negotiated. Up to now, no operational digital monitoring techniques exist that offer consistent real-time measurement facts on the superiority of nanoparticles which are existing in small amounts in H2O [212]. Furthermore, to reduce the health risk, some research institutes and international research communities should prepare proper guidelines to overcome this issue. Another, further mechanical restriction of nano-engineered water approach is that they are infrequently flexible to mass developments, and at present-day, in several cases are not modest with conservative treatment approaches [213]. However, nano-engineered materials provide excessive potential for water revolutions, in specific for decentralized water treatment technologies, point-of-use strategies, and seriously degradable pollutants. Furthermore, there is a great need to synthesize some modified nanomaterials which should be effective, having high efficiency, easy to handle and eco-friendly. It is also necessary to take the cost challenges and commercialization of these technologies for wastewater treatment. The different applications of nanomaterial can provide a tremendous offer in order to supply drinking water to whole world.

Author Contributions

A.A.Y., T.P. designed and wrote the first draft of review and drew the figures. K.U. participated in technical check and edited the full manuscript. M.N.M.I. was responsible for conceptualization of draft, technical check, and funding source for the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Universiti Sains Malaysia, (11800 Penang, Malaysia). The grant number is 1001/ PKIMIA/8011070, and APC was funded by Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Acknowledgments

This research article was financially supported by Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Penang Malaysia under the Research University Grant; 1001/ PKIMIA/8011070). The author (Khalid Umar) gratefully acknowledged the post-doctoral financial support. (USM/PPSK/FPD(BW)2/(2019).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ahmad, A.; Mohd-Setapar, S.H.; Chuong, C.S.; Khatoon, A.; Wani, W.A.; Kumar, R.; Rafatullah, M. Recent advances in new generation dye removal technologies: Novel search for approaches to reprocess wastewater. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 30801–30818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Wu, B.; Xu, H.; Liu, H.; Wang, M.; He, Y.; Pan, B. Nanomaterials-Enabled water and wastewater treatment. Nano Impact 2016, 3, 22–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gitis, V.; Hankins, N. Water treatment chemicals: Trends and challenges. J. Water Process Eng. 2018, 25, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hodges, B.C.; Cates, E.L.; Kim, J. Challenges and prospects of advanced oxidation water treatment processes using catalytic nanomaterial. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Umar, K.; Haque, M.M.; Mir, N.A.; Muneer, M. Titanium dioxide-Mediated photocatalyzed mineralization of Two Selected organic pollutants in aqueous suspensions. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 2013, 16, 252–260. [Google Scholar]
  6. Umar, K.; Ibrahim, M.N.M.; Ahmad, A.; Rafatullah, M. Synthesis of Mn-Doped TiO2 by novel route and photocatalytic mineralization/intermediate studies of organic pollutants. Res. Chem. Intermediat. 2019, 45, 2927–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baruah, S.; Khan, M.N.; Dutta, J. Perspectives and applications of nanotechnology in water treatment. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2016, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, Y.; Pang, H.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.; Fu, D.; Chen, J.; Wang, X. Environmental remediation of heavy metal ions by novel-Nanomaterials: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 246, 608–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Daer, S.; Kharraz, J.; Giwa, A.; Hasan, S.W. Recent applications of nanomaterials in water desalination: A critical review and future opportunities. Desalination 2015, 367, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yaqoob, A.A.; Ibrahim, M.N.M. A Review Article of Nanoparticles; Synthetic Approaches and Wastewater Treatment Methods. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2019, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tang, W.W.; Zeng, G.M.; Gong, J.L. Impact of humic/fulvic acid on the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using nanomaterials: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 468, 1014–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mir, N.A.; Haque, M.M.; Khan, A.; Umar, K.; Muneer, M.; Vijayalakshmi, S. Semiconductor mediated photocatalysed reaction of two selected organic compounds in aqueous suspensions of Titanium dioxide. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 2012, 15, 380–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Umar, K. Water Contamination by Organic-Pollutants: TiO2 Photocatalysis. In Modern Age Environmental Problem and Remediation; Oves, M., Khan, M.Z., Ismail, I.M.I., Eds.; Springer Nature: Basel, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 95–109. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kalhapure, R.S.; Sonawane, S.J.; Sikwal, D.R. Solid lipid nanoparticles of clotrimazole silver complex: An efficient nano antibacterial against Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA. Colloid Surf. B 2015, 136, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fang, X.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Pan, S.; Zhang, X.; Sun, X.; Han, J.S.W.; Wang, L. Internal pore decoration with polydopamine nanoparticle on polymeric ultrafiltration membrane for enhanced heavy metal removal. Chem. Eng. 2017, 314, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sekoai, P.T.; Ouma, C.N.M.; Du Preez, S.P.; Modisha, P.; Engelbrecht, N.; Bessarabov, D.G.; Ghimire, A. Application of nanoparticles in biofuels: An overview. Fuel 2019, 237, 380–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Briggs, A.M.; Cross, M.J.; Hoy, D.G.; Blyth, F.H.; Woolf, A.D.; March, L. Musculoskeletal Health Conditions Represent a Global Threat to Healthy Aging: A Report for the 2015 World Health Organization World Report on Ageing and Health. Gerontologist 2016, 56, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Umar, K.; Parveen, T.; Khan, M.A.; Ibrahim, M.N.M.; Ahmad, A.; Rafatullah, M. Degradation of organic pollutants using metal-Doped TiO2 photocatalysts under visible light: A comparative study. Desal. Water Treat. 2019, 161, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tang, K.; Gong, C.; Wang, D. Reduction potential, shadow prices, and pollution costs of agricultural pollutants in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 541, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Richter, K.E.; Ayers, J.M. An approach to predicting sediment microbial fuel cell performance in shallow and deep water. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 2628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sizmur, T.; Fresno, T.; Akgül, G.; Frost, H.; Jiménez, E.M. Review Biochar modification to enhance sorption of inorganics from water. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 246, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Wang, Z.; Carolina, L.Z.V.; Wolfson, J.M.; Pingtian, G. Review on the treatment of organic pollutants in water by ultrasonic technology. Ultrasonics Sonochem. 2019, 55, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liu, C.; Hong, T.; Li, H.; Wang, L. From club convergence of per capita industrial pollutant emissions to industrial transfer effects: An empirical study across 285 cities in China. Energy Policy 2018, 121, 300–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bayoumi, T.A.; Saleh, H.M. Characterization of biological waste stabilized by cement during immersion in aqueous media to develop disposal strategies for phytomediated radioactive waste. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2018, 107, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, H.; Guo, Y.; Qin, Y.; Li, Y.Y. Review Nutrient recovery technologies integrated with energy recovery by waste biomass anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 269, 520–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Longwane, G.H.; Sekoai, P.T.; Meyyappan, M.; Moothi, K. Review Simultaneous removal of pollutants from water using nanoparticles: A shift from single pollutant control to multiple pollutant control. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 656, 808–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rajasulochana, P.; Preethy, V. Comparison on efficiency of various techniques in treatment of waste and sewage water-A comprehensive review. Resour.-Effic. Technol. 2016, 4, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saravanan, R.; Gracia, F.; Stephen, A. Basic principles, mechanism, and challenges of photocatalysis. In Nanocomposites for Visible Light-Induced Photocatalysis; Springer, Cham: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 19–40. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gomes, J.; Lincho, J.; Domingues, E.; Quinta-Ferreira, R.M.; Martins, R.C. N–TiO2 photocatalysts: A review of their characteristics and capacity for emerging contaminants removal. Water 2019, 11, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, W.; Liu, Q.; Tian, S.; Zhao, X. Exposed facet dependent stability of ZnO micro/nano crystals as a photocatalyst. App. Surf. Sci 2019, 470, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ong, C.B.; Ng, L.Y.; Mohammad, A.W. A review of ZnO nanoparticles as solar photocatalysts: Synthesis, mechanisms and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 536–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gómez-Pastora, J.; Dominguez, S.; Bringas, E.; Rivero, M.J.; Ortiz, I.; Dionysiou, D.D. Review and perspectives on the use of magnetic nanophotocatalysts (MNPCs) in water treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 310, 407–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Umar, K.; Aris, A.; Parveen, T.; Jaafar, J.; Majid, Z.A.; Reddy, A.V.B.; Talib, J. Synthesis, Characterization of Mo and Mn doped Zno and their photocatalytic activity for the decolorization of two different chromophoric dyes. Appl. Catal A 2015, 505, 507–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Loeb, S.K.; Alvarez, P.J.; Brame, J.A.; Cates, E.L.; Choi, W.; Crittenden, J.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Li, Q.; Li-Puma, G.; Quan, X.; et al. The technology horizon for photocatalytic water treatment: Sunrise or sunset? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 2937–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Reddy, A.V.B.; Jaafar, J.; Majid, Z.A.; Aris, A.; Umar, K.; Talib, J.; Madhavi, G. Relative efficiency comparison of carboxymethyl cellulose (cmc) stabilized fe0 and fe0/ag nanoparticles for rapid degradation of chlorpyrifos in aqueous solutions. Dig. J. Nanomater. Bios. 2015, 10, 331–340. [Google Scholar]
  36. Samanta, H.S.; Das, R.; Bhattachajee, C. Influence of Nanoparticles for Wastewater Treatment-A Short Review. Austin Chem. Eng. 2016, 3, 1036–1045. [Google Scholar]
  37. Qu, X.; Alvarez, P.J.; Li, Q. Applications of nanotechnology in water and wastewater treatment. Water res 2013, 47, 3931–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sadegh, H.; Ali, G.A.M.; Gupta, V.K.; Makhlouf, A.S.H.; Nadagouda, M.N.; Sillanpaa, M.; Megiel, E. The role of nanomaterials as effective adsorbents and their applications in wastewater treatment. J. Nanostructure Chem. 2017, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Raliya, S.R.; Avery, C.; Chakrabarti, S.; Biswas, P. Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange dye by pristine TiO2, ZnO, and graphene oxide nanostructures and their composites under visible light irradiation. Appl. Nano Sci. 2017, 7, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liang, X.; Cui, S.; Li, H.; Abdelhady, A.; Wang, H.; Zhou, H. Removal effect on stormwater runoff pollution of porous concrete treated with nanometre titanium dioxide. Transp. Res. D 2019, 73, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bhatia, D.; Sharma, N.R.; Singh, J.; Kanwar, R.S. Biological methods for textile dye removal from wastewater: A review. Critcal Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 47, 1836–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sherman, J. Nanoparticulate Titanium Dioxide Coatings, and Processes for the Production and Use Thereof. U.S. Patent No, 6653356B2, 25 November 2003. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ali, I.; Ghamdi, K.A.; Wadaani, F.T.A. Advances in iridium nano catalyst preparation, characterization and applications. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 280, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bhanvase, B.A.; Shende, T.P.; Sonawane, S.H. A review on grapheme-TiO2 and doped grapheme-TiO2 nanocomposite photocatalyst for water and wastewater treatment. Environ. Technol. Rev. 2017, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yamakata, A.; Junie Jhon, M.V. Curious behaviors of photogenerated electrons and holes at the defects on anatase, rutile, and brookite TiO2 powders: A review. J. Photochem. Photobiol C Phtotochem. Rev. 2019, 40, 234–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Hu, Z.; Zhao, H.; Xie, W.; Wei, Z. Synthesis of black TiO2 with efficient visible-light photocatalytic activity by ultraviolet light irradiation and low temperature annealing. Mater Res. Bull. 2018, 98, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Di Mauro, A.; Cantarella, M.; Nicotra, G.; Pellegrino, G.; Gulino, A.; Brundo, M.V.; Privitera, V.; Impellizzeri, G. Novel synthesis of ZnO/PMMA nanocomposites for photocatalytic applications. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hassan, A.F.; Elhadidy, H. Effect of Zr+4 doping on characteristics and sono catalytic activity of TiO2/carbon nanotubes composite catalyst for degradation of chlorpyrifos. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 129, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Das, P.; Ghosh, S.; Ghosh, R.; Dam, S.; Baskey, M. Madhuca longifolia plant mediated green synthesis of cupric oxide nanoparticles: A promising environmentally sustainable material for wastewater treatment and efficient antibacterial agent. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2018, 189, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guya, N.; Cakar, S.; Ozacar, M. Comparison of palladium/zinc oxide photocatalysts prepared by different palladium doping methods for congo red degradation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 466, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bishoge, O.K.; Zhang, L.; Suntu, S.L.; Jin, H.; Zewde, A.A.; Qi, Z. Remediation of water and wastewater by using engineered nanomaterials: A review. J. Environ. Sci. Heal A 2018, 53, 537–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, X.; Xia, T.; Xu, C.; Murowchick, J.; Chen, X. Synthesis and photoactivity of nanostructured CdS–TiO2 composite catalysts. Catal Today 2014, 225, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Boyano, A.; Lázaro, M.J.; Cristiani, C.; Maldonado-Hodar, F.J.; Forzatti, P.; Moliner, R. A comparative study of V2O5/AC and V2O5/Al2O3 catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 149, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Serrà, A.; Zhang, Y.; Sepúlveda, B.; Gómez, E.; Nogués, J.; Michler, J.; Philippe, L. Highly reduced ecotoxicity of ZnO-Based micro/nanostructures on aquatic biota: Influence of architecture, chemical composition, fixation, and photocatalytic efficiency. Water Res. 2020, 69, 115210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ameta, R.; Benjamin, S.; Ameta, A.; Ameta, S.C. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants: A review. Mater. Sci. Forum 2013, 734, 247–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Phokha, S.; Klinkaewnarong, J.; Hunpratub, S.; Boonserm, K.; Swatsitang, E.; Maensiri, S. Ferromagnetism in Fe-Doped MgO nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Berekaa, M.M. Nanotechnology in wastewater treatment; influence of nanomaterials on microbial systems. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 2016, 5, 713–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Malik, A.; Hameed, S.; Siddiqui, M.J.; Haque, M.M.; Umar, K.; Khan, A.; Muneer, M. Electrical and optical properties of nickel-and molybdenum-doped titanium dioxide nanoparticle: Improved performance in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2014, 23, 3184–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Serrà, A.; Grau, S.; Gimbert-Suriñach, C.; Sort, J.; Nogués, J.; Vallés, E. Magnetically-Actuated mesoporous nanowires for enhanced heterogeneous catalysis. App. Catal B Environ. 2017, 217, 81–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ahmed, S.N.; Haider, W. Heterogeneous photocatalysis and its potential applications in water and wastewater treatment: A review. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 342001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kohtani, S.; Kawashima, A.; Miyabe, H. Stereoselective Organic Reactions in Heterogeneous Semiconductor Photocatalysis. Front Chem. 2019, 7, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lekshmi, M.V.; Nagendra, S.S.; Maiya, M.P. Heterogeneous Photocatalysis for Indoor Air Purification: Recent Advances in Technology from Material to Reactor Modeling. In Indoor Environmental Quality; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 147–166. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kanmani, S.; Sundar, K.P. Progression of Photocatalytic reactors and it’s comparison: A Review. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2020, 154, 135–150. [Google Scholar]
  64. Parrino, F.; Loddo, V.; Augugliaro, V.; Camera-Roda, G.; Palmisano, G.; Palmisano, L.; Yurdakal, S. Heterogeneous photocatalysis: Guidelines on experimental setup, catalyst characterization, interpretation, and assessment of reactivity. Catal Rev. 2019, 61, 163–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chong, M.N.; Jin, B.; Chow, C.W.; Saint, C. Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: A review. Water Res. 2010, 44, 2997–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Radhika, N.P.; Selvin, R.; Kakkar, R.; Umar, A. Recent advances in nano-photocatalysts for organic synthesis. Arab. J. Chem. 2019, 12, 4550–4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tahir, M.B.; Kiran, H.; Iqbal, T. The detoxification of heavy metals from aqueous environment using nano-photocatalysis approach: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 10515–10528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ciambelli, P.; La Guardia, G.; Vitale, L. Nanotechnology for green materials and processes. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2019, 179, 97–116. [Google Scholar]
  69. Weng, B.; Qi, M.Y.; Han, C.; Tang, Z.R.; Xu, Y.J. Photocorrosion Inhibition of Semiconductor-Based Photocatalysts: Basic Principle, Current Development, and Future Perspective. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 4642–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rajabi, H.R.; Shahrezaei, F.; Farsi, M. Zinc sulfide quantum dots as powerful and efficient nanophotocatalysts for the removal of industrial pollutant. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2016, 27, 9297–9305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mahmoodi, N.M.; Arami, M. Degradation and toxicity reduction of textile wastewater using immobilized titania nanophotocatalysis. J. Photoch. Photobio. B 2009, 94, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Van Gerven, T.; Mul, G.; Moulijn, J.; Stankiewicz, A. A review of intensification of photocatalytic processes. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2007, 46, 781–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lin, W.Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, S.; Tseng, H.R. Integrated microfluidic reactors. Nano Today 2009, 4, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wang, N.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, W.; Chan, H.L. Microfluidic reactors for photocatalytic water purification. Lab on a Chip 2014, 14, 1074–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Umar, K.; Dar, A.A.; Haque, M.M.; Mir, N.A.; Muneer, M. Photocatalysed decolourization of two textile dye derivatives, Martius Yellow and Acid Blue 129 in UV-irradiated aqueous suspensions of Titania. Desal. Water Treat. 2012, 46, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rasolevandi, T.; Naseri, S.; Azarpira, H.; Mahvi, A.H. Photo-Degradation of dexamethasone phosphate using UV/Iodide process: Kinetics, intermediates, and transformation pathways. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 295, 111703–111710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rayaroth, M.P.; Aravind, U.K.; Aravindakumar, C.T. Photocatalytic degradation of lignocaine in aqueous suspension of TiO2 nanoparticles: Mechanism of degradation and mineralization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 3556–3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Jurado-Sánchez, B.; Wang, J. Micromotors for environmental applications: A review. Environ. Sci. Nano 2018, 5, 1530–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Moo, J.G.S.; Pumera, M. Chemical energy powered nano/micro/macromotors and the environment. Chem.–A Eur. J. 2015, 21, 58–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pacheco, M.; López, M.Á.; Jurado-Sánchez, B.; Escarpa, A. Self-Propelled micromachines for analytical sensing: A critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 6561–6573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Chi, Q.; Wang, Z.; Tian, F.; You, J.A.; Xu, S. A review of fast bubble-Driven micromotors powered by biocompatible fuel: Low-Concentration fuel, bioactive fluid and enzyme. Micromachine 2018, 9, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. García-Torres, J.; Serrà, A.; Tierno, P.; Alcobé, X.; Vallés, E. Magnetic propulsion of recyclable catalytic nanocleaners for pollutant degradation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfac. 2017, 9, 23859–23868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Pourrahimi, A.M.; Pumera, M. Multifunctional and self-Propelled spherical Janus nano/micromotors: Recent advances. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 16398–16415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Eskandarloo, H.; Kierulf, A.; Abbaspourrad, A. Nano-and micromotors for cleaning polluted waters: Focused review on pollutant removal mechanisms. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 13850–13863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Gao, W.; Uygun, A.; Wang, J. Hydrogen-Bubble-Propelled Zinc-Based Microrockets in Strongly Acidic Media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 897–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zhao, G.; Stuart, E.J.E.; Pumera, M. Enhanced Diffusion of Pollutants by Self-Propulsion. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 12755–12757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Seah, T.H.; Zhao, G.; Pumera, M. Surfactant Capsules Propel Interfacial Oil Droplets: An Environmental Cleanup Strategy. Chem. Plus. Chem. 2013, 78, 395–397. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kagan, D.; Calvo-Marzal, P.; Balasubramanian, S.; Sattayasamitsathit, S.; Manesh, K.M.; Flechsig, G.U.; Wang, J. Chemical Sensing Based on Catalytic Nanomotors: Motion-Based Detection of Trace Silver. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 12082–12083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Orozco, J.; Cortes, A.; Cheng, G.; Sattayasamitsathit, S.; Gao, W.; Feng, X.; Shen, Y.; Wang, J. Molecularly Imprinted Polymer-Based Catalytic Micromotors for Selective Protein Transport. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5336–5339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wu, J.; Balasubramanian, S.; Kagan, D.; Manesh, K.M.; Campuzano, S.; Wang, J. Motion-Based DNA Detection Using Catalytic Nanomotors. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Orozco, J.; Cheng, G.; Vilela, D.; Sattayasamitsathit, S.; Vazquez-Duhalt, R.; Valdes-Ramirez, G.; Pak, O.S.; Escarpa, A.; Kan, C.; Wang, J. Micromotor-Based High-Yielding Fast Oxidative Detoxification of Chemical Threats. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 13276–13279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Soler, L.; Magdanz, V.; Fomin, V.M.; Sanchez, S.; Schmidt, O.G. Self-Propelled Micromotors for Cleaning Polluted Water. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 9611–9620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Guix, M.; Orozco, J.; Garcia, M.; Gao, W.; Sattayasamitsathit, S.; Merkoci, A.; Escarpa, A.; Wang, J. Superhydrophobic Alkanethiol-Coated Microsubmarines for Effective Removal of Oil. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 4445–4451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gao, W.; Pei, A.; Dong, R.; Wang, J. Catalytic Iridium-Based Janus Micromotors Powered by Ultralow Levels of Chemical Fuels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 2276–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dey, K.K.; Bhandari, S.; Bandyopadhyay, D.; Basu, S.; Chattopadhyay, A. The pH Taxis of an Intelligent Catalytic Microbot. Small 2013, 9, 1916–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Soler, L.; Sánchez, S. Catalytic nanomotors for environmental monitoring and water remediation. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 7175–7182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Li, J.; Singh, V.V.; Sattayasamitsathit, S.; Orozco, J.; Kaufmann, K.; Dong, R.; Gao, W.; Jurado-Sanchez, B.; Fedorak, Y.; Wang, J. Water-Driven micromotors for rapid photocatalytic degradation of biological and chemical warfare agents. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 11118–11125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Orozco, J.; Mercante, L.A.; Pol, R.; Merkoçi, A. Graphene-Based Janus micromotors for the dynamic removal of pollutants. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 3371–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, J.; Chang, H.; Ma, L.; Hao, J.; Yang, R.T. Low-Temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over metal oxide and zeolite catalysts-A review. Catal Today 2011, 175, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pourrahimi, A.M.; Villa, K.; Ying, Y.; Sofer, Z.; Pumera, M. ZnO/ZnO2/Pt Janus Micromotors Propulsion Mode Changes with Size and Interface Structure: Enhanced Nitroaromatic Explosives Degradation under Visible Light. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 42688–42697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Srivastava, S.K.; Guix, M.; Schmidt, O.G. Wastewater mediated activation of micromotors for efficient water cleaning. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 817–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, J.; Hong, C.; Shi, X.; Nawar, S.; Werner, J.; Huang, G.; Ye, M.; Weitz, D.A.; Solovev, A.A.; Mei, Y. Hydrogel Microcapsules with Photocatalytic Nanoparticles for Removal of Organic Pollutants. Environ. Sci. Nano 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gao, W.; D′Agostino, M.; Garcia-Gradilla, V.; Orozco, J.; Wang, J. Multi-fuel driven janus micromotors. Small 2013, 9, 467–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Pourrahimi, A.M.; Liu, D.; Ström, V.; Hedenqvist, M.S.; Olsson, R.T.; Gedde, U.W. Heat treatment of ZnO nanoparticles: New methods to achieve high-Purity nanoparticles for high-voltage applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 17190–17200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ge, H.; Chen, X.; Liu, W.; Lu, X.; Gu, Z. Metal-Based Transient Micromotors: From Principle to Environmental and Biomedical Applications. Chem.–Asian J. 2019, 14, 2348–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Zhang, Q.; Dong, R.; Wu, Y.; Gao, W.; He, Z.; Ren, B. Light-Driven [email protected] C Janus micromotors for rapid photodegradation of dye pollutants. ACS App. Mater. Interface 2017, 9, 4674–4683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Zhang, Y.; Yuan, K.; Zhang, L. Micro/nanomachines: From functionalization to sensing and removal. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1800636–1800658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, H.; Khezri, B.; Pumera, M. Catalytic DNA-Functionalized self-Propelled micromachines for environmental remediation. Chem. 2016, 1, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zhang, B.; Huang, G.; Wang, L.; Wang, T.; Liu, L.; Di, Z.; Liu, X.; Mei, Y. Rolled-Up Monolayer Graphene Tubular Micromotors: Enhanced Performance and Antibacterial Property. Chem.–Asian J. 2019, 14, 2479–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Wang, L.; Song, H.; Yuan, L.; Li, Z.; Zhang, P.; Gibson, J.K.; Zheng, L.; Wang, H.; Chai, Z.; Shi, W. Effective Removal of Anionic Re (VII) by Surface-Modified Ti2CT x MXene Nanocomposites: Implications for Tc (VII) Sequestration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 3739–3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Gao, W.; Dong, R.; Thamphiwatana, S.; Li, J.; Gao, W.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. Artificial micromotors in the mouse’s stomach: A step toward in vivo use of synthetic motors. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Safdar, M.; Simmchen, J.; Jänis, J. Correction: Light-Driven micro-and nanomotors for environmental remediation. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 4, 2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Fu, P.P.; Xia, Q.; Hwang, H.M.; Ray, P.C.; Yu, H. Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: Generation of reactive oxygen species. J. Food Drug Anal. 2014, 22, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ying, Y.; Pumera, M. Micro/Nanomotors for Water Purification. Chem–Eur. J. 2019, 25, 106–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Fernández-Medina, M.; Ramos-Docampo, M.A.; Hovorka, O.; Salgueiriño, V.; Städler, B. Recent Advances in Nano-and Micromotors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 1908283–19082299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jhaveri, J.H.; Murthy, Z.V.P. A comprehensive review on anti-Fouling nanocomposite membranes for pressure driven membrane separation processes. Desalination 2016, 379, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hogen-Esch, T.; Pirbazari, M.; Ravindran, V.; Yurdacan, H.M.; Kim, W. High Performance Membranes for Water Reclamation Using Polymeric and Nanomaterials. U.S. Patent No. 20160038885A, 29 October 2019. [Google Scholar]
  118. Waduge, P.; Larkin, J.; Upmanyu, M.; Kar, S.; Wanunu, M. Programmed Synthesis of Freestanding Graphene Nanomembrane Arrays. Nano Microphone 2015, 11, 597–603. [Google Scholar]
  119. Bassyouni, M.; Abdel-Aziz, M.H.; Zoromba, M.S.; Abdel Hamid, S.M.S.; Drioli, E. A review of polymeric nanocomposite membranes for water purification. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 73, 19–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zahid, M.; Rashid, A.; Akram, S.; Rehan, Z.A.; Razzaq, W. A Comprehensive Review on Polymeric Nano-Composite Membranes for Water Treatment. J. Membr. Sci. Technol. 2018, 8, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Saleh, A.; Parthasarathy, P.; Irfan, M. Advanced functional polymer nanocomposites and their use in water ultra-purification. Trends Environ Anal. 2019, 24, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Kochkodan, V.; Hilal, N. A comprehensive review on surface modified polymer membranes for biofouling mitigation. Desalination 2015, 356, 187–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ronen, A.; Duan, W.; Wheeldon, I.; Walker, S.; Jassby, D. Microbial Attachment Inhibition through Low-Voltage Electrochemical Reactions on Electrically Conducting Membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 12741–12750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Yin, J.; Yang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Deng, B. Attachment of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) onto thin-Film composite (TFC) membranes through covalent bonding to reduce membrane biofouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 441, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zhang, M.; Field, R.W.; Zhang, K. Biogenic silver nanocomposite polyethersulfone UF membranes with antifouling properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 471, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Hirata, K.; Watanabe, H.; Kubo, W. Nanomembranes as a substrate for ultra-thin lightweight devices. Thin Solid Film. 2019, 676, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gopalakrishnan, I.; Samuel, S.R.; Sridharan, K. nanomaterials-Based adsorbents for water and waste water treatment. Emerg. Nanotechnol. Environ. Sustain. 2018, 6, 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  128. Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Hana, W.; Li, J.; Shen, J.; Wang, I. Improved degradation of the aqueous flutriafol using a nanostructure microporous PbO2 as reactive electrochemical membrane. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 253, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Shetti, N.P.; Bukkitgar, S.D.; Reddy, K.R.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Nanostructured titanium oxide hybrids-Based electrochemical biosensors for healthcare applications. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 178, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Kunduru, R.K.; Kovsky, M.N.; Rajendra, S.F.; Pawar, P.; Basu, A.; Domb, A.J. Nanotechnology for water purification: Applications of nanotechnology methods in wastewater treatment. Water Purif. 2017, 10, 33–74. [Google Scholar]
  131. Ibrahim, R.K.; Hayyan, M.; Al-saadi, M.A.; Hayyan, A.; Ibrahim, S. Environmental application of nanotechnology; air, soil, and water. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R 2016, 23, 13754–13788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Mekaru, H.; Lu, J.; Tamanoi, F. Development of mesoporous silica-Based nanoparticles with controlled release capability for cancer therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 95, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Jawed, A.; Saxena, V.; Pandey, L.M. Engineered nanomaterials and their surface functionalization for the removal of heavy metals: A review. J. Wat. Process. Eng. 2020, 33, 101009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Umar, K.; Aris, A.; Ahmad, H.; Parveen, T.; Jaafar, J.; Majid, Z.A.; Reddy, A.V.B.; Talib, J. Synthesis of visible light active doped TiO2 for the degradation of organic pollutants-Methylene blue and glyphosate. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 7, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kumar, M.; Patil, P.; Kim, G.D. Marine microorganisms for synthesis of metallic nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. Coll. Surface B 2018, 172, 487–495. [Google Scholar]
  136. Al-Ghouti, M.A.; Kaabi, M.A.A.; Ashfaq, M.Y.; Dana, D.A. Produced water characteristics, treatment and reuse: A review. J. Water Proc. Eng. 2019, 28, 222–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ahn, Y.Y.; Yun, E.T.; Seo, J.W.; Lee, C.; Kim, S.H.; Lee, J. Activation of peroxymonosulfate by surface loaded Nobel metal nanoparticles for oxidative degradation of organic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 10187–10197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Abdullah, N.; Yusof, N.; Lau, W.J.; Jaafar, J.; Ismail, A.F. Review Recent trends of heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by membrane technologies. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 76, 17–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Bhat, A.H.; Rehman, W.U.; Khan, I.U.; Ahmad, S.; Ayoub, M.; Usmani, M.A. Nanocomposite membrane for environmental remediation. In Polymer-Based Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications; Jawaid, M., Khan, M.M., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 407–440. [Google Scholar]
  140. Muntha, S.T.; Kausar, A.; Siddiq, M. Advances in polymeric nanofiltration membrane: A review. Polym.-Plast Technol. Eng. 2017, 56, 841–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Rashidi, H.R.; Sulaiman, N.M.N.; Hashim, N.A.; Hassan, C.R.C.; Ramli, M.R. Synthetic reactive dye wastewater treatment by using nano-Membrane filtration. Desalin. Water Treat. 2015, 55, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Belloň, T.; Polezhaev, P.; Vobecká, L.; Slouka, Z. Fouling of a heterogeneous anion-Exchange membrane and single anion-Exchange resin particle by ssdna manifests differently. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 572, 619–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Naeem, F.; Naeem, S.; Zhao, Z.; Shu, G.Q.; Zhang, J.; Mei, Y.; Huang, G.S. Atomic layer deposition synthesized ZnO nanomembranes: A facile route towards stable supercapacitor electrode for high capacitance. J. Power Source 2020, 451, 227740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Feng, C.; Khulbe, K.C.; Matsuura, T. Recent progress in the preparation, characterization, and applications of nanofibers and nanofiber membranes via electrospinning/interfacial polymerization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 115, 756–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Esfahani, M.R.; Aktij, S.A.; Dabaghian, Z.; Firouzjaei, M.D.; Rahimpour, A.; Eke, J.; Escobar, I.C.; Abolhassani, M.; Greenlee, L.F.; Esfahani, A.R.; et al. Nanocomposite membranes for water separation and purification: Fabrication, modification, and applications. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 213, 465–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Tang, C.; Wang, Z.; Petrinić, I.; Fane, A.G.; Hélix-Nielsen, C. Biomimetic aquaporin membranes coming of age. Desalination 2015, 368, 89–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Cornwell, D.J.; Smith, D.K. Expanding the scope of gels–Combining polymers with low-MOLECULAR-Weight gelators to yield modified self-Assembling smart materials with high-Tech applications. Mater. Horiz. 2015, 2, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Asatekin, A.; Menniti, A.; Kang, S.; Elimelech, M.; Morgenroth, E.; Mayes, A.M. Antifouling nanofiltration membranes for membrane bioreactors from self-assembling graft copolymers. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 285, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Ying, Y.; Ying, W.; Li, Q.; Meng, D.; Ren, G.; Yan, R.; Peng, X. Recent advances of nanomaterial-Based membrane for water purification. App. Mater. Today 2017, 7, 144–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Montemagno, C.; Schmidt, J.; Tozzi, S. Biomimetic Membranes. U.S. Patent No. 20040049230, 11 March 2004. [Google Scholar]
  151. Salim, W.; Ho, W.S.W. Recent developments on nanostructured polymer-Based membranes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2015, 8, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Yu, L.; Ruan, S.; Xu, X.; Zou, R.; Hu, J. Review One-Dimensional nanomaterial-Assembled macroscopic membranes for water treatment. Nano Today 2017, 17, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Fuwad, A.; Ryu, H.; Malmstadt, N.; Kim, S.M.; Jeon, T.J. Biomimetic membranes as potential tools for water purification: Preceding and future avenues. Desalination 2019, 458, 97–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Shen, Y.X.; Saboe, P.O.; Sines, I.T.; Erbakan, M.; Kumar, M. Biomimetic membranes: A review. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 454, 359–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Peng, F.; Xu, T.; Wu, F.; Ma, C.X.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Zhao, B.; Mao, C. Novel biomimetic enzyme for sensitive detection of superoxide anions. Talanta 2017, 174, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Giwa, A.; Hasan, S.W.; Yousaf, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Johnson, D.J.; Hilal, N. Biomimetic membranes: A critical review of recent progress. Desalination 2017, 420, 403–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Diallo, M.S. Water Treatment by Dendrimer-Enhanced Filtration. U.S. Patent No. 2009/0223896, 10 September 2009. [Google Scholar]
  158. Sahebi, S.; Sheikhi, M.; Ramavandi, B. A new biomimetic aquaporin thin film composite membrane for forward osmosis: Characterization and performance assessment. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019, 148, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Perez, T.; Pasquini, D.; Lima, A.F.; Rosa, E.V.; Sousa, M.H.; Cerqueira, D.A.; Morais, L.C. Efficient removal of lead ions from water by magnetic nanosorbents based on manganese ferrite nano particles capped with thin layers of modified biopolymers. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 802–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Manikam, M.K.; Halim, A.A.; Hanafiah, M.M.; Krishnamoorthy, R.R. Removal of ammonia nitrogen, nitrate, phosphorus and COD from sewage wastewater using palm oil boiler ash composite adsorbent. Desal. Water Treat. 2019, 149, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Charee, S.W.; Aravinthan, V.; Erdei, L.; Raj, W.S. Use of macadamia nut shell residues as magnetic nanosorbents. Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2017, 124, 276–287. [Google Scholar]
  162. Rodovalho, F.L.; Capistrano, G.; Gomes, J.A.; Sodre, F.F.; Chaker, J.A.; Campos, A.F.C.; Bakuzis, A.F.; Sousa, A.H. Elaboration of magneto-Thermally recyclable nanosorbents for remote removal of toluene in contaminated water using magnetic hyperthermia. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 15, 725–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Sun, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, G.; Qiu, G.; Zhong, N.; Wu, L.; Cai, D.; Wu, Z. Reducing the pollution risk of pesticide using nano networks induced by irradiation and hydrothermal treatment. J. Environ. Sci. Health C 2015, 50, 901–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Lee, X.J.; Foo, L.P.Y.; Tan, K.W.; Hassell, D.G.; Lee, L.Y. Evaluation of carbon-Based nanosorbents synthesized by ethylene decomposition on stainless steel substrates as potential sequestrating materials for nickel ions in aqueous solution. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 1559–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Kyzas, G.Z.; Matis, K.A. Review Nanoadsorbents for pollutants removal: A review. J. Mol. Liq. 2015, 203, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Hou, C.; Liu, M. Mussel-Inspired synthesis of magnetic polydopamine–Chitosan nanoparticles as bio sorbent for dyes and metals removal. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. E 2016, 61, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Krstić, V.; Pesovski, T.U.B. A review on adsorbents for treatment of water and wastewaters containing copper ions. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 192, 273–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Unuabonah, E.I.; Taubert, A. Review article Clay-Polymer nanocomposites (CPNs): Adsorbents of the future for water treatment. Appl. Clay Sci. 2014, 99, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Yadav, V.B.; Gadi, R.; Kalra, S. Clay based nanocomposites for removal of heavy metals from water: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 232, 803–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Vunain, E.; Mishra, A.K.; Mamba, B.B. Dendrimers, mesoporous silicas and chitosan-Based nanosorbents for the removal of heavy-Metal ions: A review. Int. J. Biolog. Macromol. 2016, 86, 570–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Khajeh, M.; Laurent, S.; Dastafkan, K. Nanoadsorbents: Classification, preparation, and applications (with emphasis on aqueous media). Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 7728–7768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Zhang, Y.H.; Hu, C.Z.; Liu, F.; Yuan, Y.; Wu, H.; Li, A. Effects of ionic strength on removal of toxic pollutants from aqueous media with multifarious adsorbents: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Kobielska, P.; Howarth, A.J.; Farha, O.K.; Nayak, S. Review Metal–Organic frameworks for heavy metal removal from water. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 358, 92–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Quesada, H.B.; Baptista, A.T.A.; Cusioli, L.F.; Seibert, D.; Bezerra, C.O.; Bergamasco, R. Surface water pollution by pharmaceuticals and an alternative of removal by low-Cost adsorbents: A review. Chemosphere 2019, 222, 766–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Brandao, D.; Liebana, S.; Pividori, M.I. Multiplexed detection of foodborne pathogens based on magnetic particles. New Biotechnol. 2015, 8, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Jones, D.; Caballero, S.; Pardo, G.D. Bioavailability of nanotechnology-Based bioactive and nutraceuticals. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2019, 1, 2–9. [Google Scholar]
  177. Wang, S.; Lu, W.; Tovmachenko, O.; Rai, U.S.; Yu, H.; Ray, P.C. Challenge in Understanding Size and Shape Dependent Toxicity of Gold Nanomaterials in Human Skin Keratinocytes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 463, 145–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Takahashi, H.; Niidome, Y.; Niidome, T.; Kaneko, K.; Kawasaki, H.; Yamada, S. Modification of gold nanorods using phosphatidylcholine to reduce cytotoxicity. Langmuir 2006, 22, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Karlsson, H.L.; Cronholm, P.; Gustafsson, J.; Möller, L. Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: A comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008, 21, 1726–1732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Ajdary, M.; Moosavi, M.A.; Rahmati, M.; Falahati, M.; Mahboubi, M.; Mandegary, A.; Jangjoo, I.S.; Mohammad inejad, R.; Varma, R.S. Health Concerns of Various Nanoparticles: A Review of Their in Vitro and in Vivo Toxicity. Nanomater 2018, 1, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Ray, P.C.; Hongtao, Y.; Peter, P. Toxicity and Environmental Risks of Nanomaterials: Challenges and Future Needs. J. Environ. Sci. Health C Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxicol. Rev. 2009, 27, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Taju, G.; Majeed, S.A.; Nambi, K.; Hameed, A.S. In vitro assay for the toxicity of silver nanoparticles using heart and gill cell lines of catla catla and gill cell line of labeo rohita. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 161, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Jia, G.; Wang, H.; Yan, L.; Wang, X.; Pei, R.; Yan, T.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, X. Cytotoxicity of carbon nanomaterials: Single-Wall nanotube, multi-wall nanotube, and fullerene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 1378–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Baig, N.; Ihsanullah, M.; Sajjid, T.A.; Saleh, A. Graphene-Based adsorbents for the removal of toxic organic pollutants: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 244, 370–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Mansoori, G.A.; Bastami, T.R.; Ahmadpour, A.; Eshaghi, Z. Environmental application of nanotechnology. Annu. Rev. Nano Res. 2008, 2, 439–493. [Google Scholar]
  186. Ersan, G.; Apul, O.G.; Perreault, F.; Karanfil, T. Adsorption of organic contaminants by graphene nanosheets: A review. Water Res. 2017, 126, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Kumar, V.; Kumar, P.; Pounara, A.; Vellingiri, K.; Kim, K.H. Nanomaterials for the sensing of narcotics: Challenges and opportunities. Trends Anal Chem. 2018, 2, 84–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Heijden, V.D. Developments and challenges in the manufacturing, characterization and scale-Up of energetic nanomaterials-A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 350, 939–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Adeleye, A.S.; Conway, J.R.; Garner, K.; Huang, Y.; Su, Y.A.; Keller, A. Engineered nanomaterials for water treatment and remediation: Costs, benefits, and applicability. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 286, 640–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Pandey, N.; Shukla, S.K.; Singh, N.B. Water purification by polymer nanocomposites: An overview. Nanocomposites 2017, 3, 47–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Santhosh, C.; Velmurugan, V.P.; Jacob, G.; Jeong, S.K.; Grace, N.A.; Bhatnagar, A. Role of nanomaterials in water treatment applications: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 306, 1116–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Tate, J.E.; Burton, A.H.; Pinto, C.B. Global, Regional, and National Estimates of Rotavirus Mortality in Children <5 Years of Age, 2000–2013. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Prathna, T.C.; Sharma, S.K.; Kennedy, M. Review Nanoparticles in household level water treatment: An overview. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 199, 260–270. [Google Scholar]
  194. Umar, K.; Haque, M.M.; Muneer, M.; Harada, T.; Matsumura, M. Mo, Mn and La doped TiO2: Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity for the decolourization of three different chromophoric dyes. J. Alloy Compd. 2013, 578, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Soppe, A.I.A.; Heijman, S.G.J.; Gensburger, I.; Shantz, A.; Halem, D.V.; Kroesbergen, J.; Wubbels, G.H.; Smeets, P.W.M.H. Critical parameters in the production of ceramic pot filters for household water treatment in developing countries. J. Water Health 2014, 13, 587–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Bushra, R.; Shahadat, M.; Ahmad, A.; Nabi, S.A.; Umar, K.; Muneer, M.; Raeissia, A.S.; Owais, M. Synthesis, characterization, antimicrobial activity and applications of composite adsorbent for the analysis of organic and inorganic pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 264, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Nor, N.A.M.; Jaafar, J.; Othman, M.H.D.; Rahman, M.A. A review study of nanofibers in photocatalytic process for wastewater treatment. J. Teknologi. 2013, 65, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Zhang, Y.Z.; Wang, X.; Feng, Y.; Li, J.; Lim, C.T.; Ramakrishna, S. Coaxial electrospinning of (fluorescein isothiocyanate-Conjugated bovine serum albumin)-Encapsulated poly (ε-caprolactone) nanofibers for sustained release. Biomacromolecule 2006, 7, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Chuang, C.S.; Wang, M.K.; Ko, C.H.; Ou, C.C.; Wu, C.H. Removal of benzene and toluene by carbonized bamboo materials modified with TiO2. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 954–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  200. Wu, C.H.; Chang, H.W.; Chern, J.M. Basic dye decomposition kinetics in a photocatalytic slurry reactor. J. Hazard Mater. 2006, 137, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Paek, S.M.; Jung, H.; Lee, Y.J.; Park, M.; Hwang, S.J.; Choy, J.H. Exfoliation and reassembling route to mesoporous titania nanohybrids. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1134–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Fu, W.; Yang, H.; Chang, L.; Li, M.; Zou, G. Anatase TiO2 nanolayer coating on strontium ferrite nanoparticles for magnetic photocatalyst. Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2006, 289, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Hamadanian, M.; Reisi-Vanani, A.; Majedi, A. Synthesis, characterization and effect of calcination temperature on phase transformation and photocatalytic activity of Cu,S-codoped TiO2 nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 1837–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Yu, C.; Cai, D.; Yang, K.; Yu, J.C.; Zhou, Y.; Fan, C. Sol–gel derived S,I-codoped mesoporous TiO2 photocatalyst with high visible-Light photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2010, 71, 1337–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Umar, M.; Aziz, H.A. Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in water. Org. Pollut.-Monit. Risk Treat. 2013, 8, 196–197. [Google Scholar]
  206. Dimapilis, E.A.S.; Hsu, C.S.; Mendoza, R.M.O.; Lu, M.C. Zinc oxide nanoparticles for water disinfection. Sustain. Environ. 2018, 28, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Sultana, S.; Rafiuddin; Khan, M.Z.; Umar, K.; Ahmed, A.S.; Shahadat, M. SnO2-SrO based nanocomposites and their photocatalytic activity for the treatment of organic pollutants. J. Mol. Struct. 2015, 1098, 393–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Faisal, M.; Tariq, M.A.; Khan, A.; Umar, K.; Muneer, M. Photochemical reactions of 2, 4-dichloroaniline and 4-nitroanisole in aqueous suspension of titanium dioxide. Sci. Adv. Mater. 2011, 3, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. He, D.; Sun, Y.; Xin, L.; Feng, J. Aqueous tetracycline degradation by non-Thermal plasma combined with nano-TiO2. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 258, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Mir, N.A.; Khan, A.; Umar, K.; Muneer, M. Photocatalytic Study of a Xanthene Dye Derivative, Phloxine B in Aqueous Suspension of TiO2: Adsorption Isotherm and Decolourization Kinetics. Energy Environ. Focus 2013, 2, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Dar, A.A.; Umar, K.; Mir, N.A.; Haque, M.M.; Muneer, M.; Boxall, C. Photocatalysed degradation of an herbicide derivative, Dinoterb, in aqueous suspension. Res. Chem. Intermediat. 2011, 37, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Schlosser, D. Biotechnologies for Water Treatment. In Advanced Nano-Bio Technologies for Water and Soil Treatment; Springer, Cham: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 335–343. [Google Scholar]
  213. Lu, F.; Astruc, D. Nanocatalysts and other nanomaterials for water remediation from organic pollutants. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2020, 408, 213180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Potential applications of nanophotocatalysts.
Figure 1. Potential applications of nanophotocatalysts.
Water 12 00495 g001
Figure 2. General mechanism of toxic organic compound degradation through nanophotocatalysts.
Figure 2. General mechanism of toxic organic compound degradation through nanophotocatalysts.
Water 12 00495 g002
Figure 3. Different degradation and mineralization products of Lignocaine.
Figure 3. Different degradation and mineralization products of Lignocaine.
Water 12 00495 g003
Figure 4. Different pollutant removal mechanisms used by nano/micromotors (adapted with permission from Royal Chemical Society) [84].
Figure 4. Different pollutant removal mechanisms used by nano/micromotors (adapted with permission from Royal Chemical Society) [84].
Water 12 00495 g004
Figure 5. Publication trends in field of nanomaterial for wastewater treatment.
Figure 5. Publication trends in field of nanomaterial for wastewater treatment.
Water 12 00495 g005
Figure 6. Schematic illustrating of TiO2 photocatalytic process (Adapted with permission from Jurnal Teknologi) [197].
Figure 6. Schematic illustrating of TiO2 photocatalytic process (Adapted with permission from Jurnal Teknologi) [197].
Water 12 00495 g006
Table 1. Indicates different water pollutants with their sources and adverse effects.
Table 1. Indicates different water pollutants with their sources and adverse effects.
Water PollutantsSource of PollutantsEffect of PollutantsReferences
Pathogens Viruses and bacteriaWater borne diseases[18]
Agricultural PollutantsAgricultural chemicalsDirectly affect the fresh water resources[19]
Sediments and suspended solidsLand cultivation, demolition, mining operationsDamaging fish spawning, affecting aquatic environment of insects and fishes[20]
Inorganic PollutantsMetals compounds, Trace elements, Inorganic salts, Heavy metals, Mineral acids, Aquatic flora and fauna, Public Health problems[21]
Organic PollutantsDetergents, Insecticides, Herbicides.Aquatic life problems, Cacogenic.[22]
Industrial PollutantsMunicipal pollutant WaterCaused water and air pollution.[23]
Radioactive PollutantsDifferent IsotopesBones, teeth, skin and can cause[24]
Nutrients PollutantsPlant debris, fertilizer.Effect on eutrophication process.[25]
Macroscopic PollutantsMarine debrisPlastic pollution.[26]
Sewage and contaminated waterDomestic WastewaterWater borne diseases[27]
Table 2. List of nano/micromotors and their applications.
Table 2. List of nano/micromotors and their applications.
MotorsWorking MechanismApplications References
Zn, Al/Pd micromotorsspeed-pH dependencepH controlling[85]
Hydrophobic agglomerates
of pollutants
Surface tension inducedIncreased diffusion
of pollutants
[86]
Polymer capsule motorsSurface tension induced cargo towingOil remediation [87]
Au/Pt nanomotorssilver-induced accelerationDetection of silver ions[88]
Ag-based Janus MIP microparticlesMolecular imprinted polymer recognitionsolid-phase extraction[89]
Au/Pt nanomotorsDNA hybridization through using Ag nanoparticleDNA detection[90]
Bubble-propelled Pt-based micro enginesHigh fluid transportOxidative detoxification of nerve agents[91]
Bubble-propelled Pt-based micro enginesFenton reaction; high diffusionDegradation of organic
pollutants
[92]
SAM modified Pt micro enginesHydrophobic interactions with
oil droplets
Oil removal[93]
Ir/SiO2 Janus motors Speed-concentration dependenceDetection of hydrazine [94]
Pd nanoparticle-containing
Microspheres
pH dependencepH monitoring[95]
Table 3. List of nano/micromotors for water decontamination in presence of fuel.
Table 3. List of nano/micromotors for water decontamination in presence of fuel.
Type of NanomotorsTarget PollutantsOperational MechanismFuelReferences
PEDOT/Pt bilayer nanomotorOrganophosphorus nerve AgentsOxidative neutralizationH2O2[96]
Ag-incorporated zeolite-Adsorptive Detoxification H2O2[97]
rGO-SiO2–Pt Janus magnetic micromotorsPolybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and 5-chloro-2-(2,4-dichlorophene) phenol (triclosan)AdsorptionH2O2[98]
Pt coating Activated carbon-based motorsHeavy metals (Pb2+), nitroaromatic explosives, dyesAdsorption of active carbonH2O2[99]
Zero-valent-iron/platinum (ZVI/Pt)Methylene blueFenton reactionH2O2[100]
[email protected] nanorods4-nitrophenol, Methylene Blue, and Rhodoamine BDegradationBorohydride[82]
Pd-Ti/Fe/Cr tubular microjets4-nitrophenol (4-NP)4-nitrophenol (4-NP)Borohydride[101]
Au NPs/TiO2/Pt nanomotorsuper organic mixturePhotocatalytic Degradation H2O2[102]
Polystyrene–Zn–Fe coreshell MicroparticlesRhodamine BFenton reactionH2O2[103]
TiO2/Au/Mg microspheresMineralization of the highly persistent organophosphate nerve agents, bis (4-nitrophenyl) phosphate (b-NPP) and methyl paraoxon (MP)Photocatalytic degradation-[104]
Biotin-functionalized Janus silica MicromotorRhodamine BCharge adsorptionH2O2[105]
Fe0 Janus nanomotorsAzo dyesFenton reactionCitric acid[106]
CoNi-Bi2O3/BiOCl-based hybrid MicrorobotsRhodamine BPhotocatalytic degradationUV light[107]
DNA-functionalized Au/Pt MicrotubesHg2+AdsorptionH2O2[108]
GOx-Ni/PtPb2+AdsorptionH2O2[109]
3D printed motors (TSM)Oil dropletsAdsorption-[110]
Alkanethiols-coated Au/Ni/PEDOT/Pt microsubmarineOil dropletshydrophobicity upon the oil-nanomotor interactionH2O2[111]
Table 4. Advantages/disadvantages and applications of nanomembranes.
Table 4. Advantages/disadvantages and applications of nanomembranes.
Different Type of NanomembranesAdvantage of NanomembraneDisadvantages of NanomembraneApplicationReference
Nanofiber membranesExcellent porosity, tailor-made, bactericidal, good permeate efficiency, Pore blocking, conceivably discharge of nanofibersUltrafiltration, prefiltration, filter cartridge, water handling, separate filtration devices[144]
Nanocomposite membranesHigh hydrophilicity, better water permeability, high fouling resistance, good thermal and mechanical stabilityResistant substance substantial required when oxidizing nanomaterial, used to discharge nanoparticlesEntirely dependent on composites[145]
Aquaporin-based membranesImproved ionic selectivity and better permeabilityPoor mechanical stabilityLess pressure desalination[146]
Self-assembling membranesHomogeneous nanopores membranesLaboratory scale availability onlyUltrafiltration[147]
Nanofiltration membranesCharge-based repulsion, comparative less pressure, better selectivityMembrane blocking Colour, Reduction of hardness, odour[148]
Table 5. Most commonly used nanosorbents and their functions.
Table 5. Most commonly used nanosorbents and their functions.
Different NanosorbentsTreatment FunctionReferences
Carbon-based nanosorbentsNickel ions present in water[162]
Graphite OxideRemoval of dyes[163]
Regenerable polymeric Nano sorbentsOrganic pollutants, inorganic contaminants of wastewaters[164]
NanoclayHydrocarbons, Dyes[165]
Nano-metal oxidesDifferent Heavy metals[166]
Nano-AerogelsTo remove the uranium fromdrinking water[167]
Nano-iron oxidesTo eliminate the hormones andtoxic pharmaceuticals materialfrom water[168]
Polymer FibersTo remove the arsenic and other toxic metals[169]
Table 6. Observation of self-toxic effect of some common nanomaterials.
Table 6. Observation of self-toxic effect of some common nanomaterials.
NanomaterialsObservationsReferences
Gold nanorods doped poly(styrenesulfonate) (PSS) compositeNon-toxic[177]
TiO2, Al2O3/Carbon black CompositeMore toxic at micron particle sized[177]
Hexadecylcetyltrimethylammoni um bromide (CTAB) doped Au nano rode compositeHigh toxic at certain Concentration[178]
Fe2O3 and carbon nanotubes CompositeIt showed toxic effects and damage DNA even at lowest concentration[179]
Carbon, metal, Al2O3 compositeConcentration- and time-dependent.[180]
CdSe Quantum dots doped with polyvinylcarbazole compositeAcute toxicity observed[181]
Single and Multi-walled carbon NanotubesToxicity increases when concentration rises beyond 15 µg/cm.[182]
Au/Carbon compositeNon-toxic at lower range.[183]
Ag/Carbon compositeTime- and dose dependent but toxic[179]
Table 7. Summary of water treatments by using nanomaterial by different mechanisms [185].
Table 7. Summary of water treatments by using nanomaterial by different mechanisms [185].
Nanoparticles (NPs)Target Analyte Treatment MechanismLimitationPositive Aspect
TiO2Organic PollutantsPhotocatalysisHigher operation cost Tough to recovery, sludge productiontoxic less, Water insolubility, photostability
FeHeavy metals, anions, organic pollutantsReduction, adsorptionTough to recovery, sludge Production, difficult sludge disposal, Health riskIn situ water remediation, Less cost, harmless to handle
Bimetallic NPsDichlorinationReduction, adsorptionTough to recovery, sludge ProductionHigher reactivity
Nanofiltration and nanomembranesOrganic and inorganic substancesNanofiltrationHigh cost, membrane FoulingLow pressure
Magnetite NPsHeavy metals, organic CompoundsAdsorptionOutside magnetically field needed for SeparationEasy separation, no sludge production
Metal-sorbing vesiclesHeavy metalsAdsorptionRe-use option, higher selective uptake profile, better metal affinityDifficult to maintain stability
MicellesOrganic pollutantsAdsorptionIn situ treatment, excellent affinity for hydrophobic Costly
DendrimersHeavy metals, organic PollutantsEncapsulationEasy separation, renewable, high binding no sludge production,Costly
NanotubeHeavy metals, anions, organic pollutantsAdsorptionDealing with pollution from water, Good mechanical properties, exclusive Electrical properties, Good chemical stabilityHigh cost, lower adsorption process, Tough to recovery, sludge production, Dangerous Health risk
NanoclayHeavy metals, anions, organic pollutantsAdsorptionLower cost, Exclusive structures, long stability, recycle, Higher sorption capacity, Informal recovery, better surface and pore volumeSludge production
Table 8. Observation of different pollutant removal by TiO2 nanophotocatalyst.
Table 8. Observation of different pollutant removal by TiO2 nanophotocatalyst.
NanophotocatalystTarget Analyte Initial Concentration of PollutantRemediation EfficiencyDoses of NanophotocatalystReferences
TiO2Nitrobenzene50 mg/L1000.1M[185]
TiO2Methyl orange30 mg/L1003 g/L[185]
TiO2Rhodamine 6G125 mmol/L900.1%(w/w)[185]
TiO2Parathion50 mg/L701000 mg/L[198]
TiO2Benzene45 mg/L725 g[199]
TiO2Phenol-1001.8 g/L[185]
TiO2Rhodamine B1.0 × 10−5 M9750 mg/50ml[185]
TiO2Toluene45 mg/L715 g[185]
TiO2Basic dye20 mg/L801.22 g/L[200]
TiO24-chlorophenol1.0 × 10−5 M9925 mg/100ml[201]
TiO2Procion Red
MX-5B
10 mg/L98(2.0mg) TiO2 (30%)[202]
Table 9. Observation of different pollutant removal by Doped-TiO2 nanophotocatalyst.
Table 9. Observation of different pollutant removal by Doped-TiO2 nanophotocatalyst.
NanophotocatalystTarget Analyte Doping AgentRemediation EfficiencySource of LightReferences
TiO2GlyphosateMn80Visible[134]
TiO2Methylene BlueMn75Visible[33]
TiO2Methylene OrangeCu100Visible[203]
TiO2Methylene BlueS, I90Visible[204]
TiO2FormaldehydeN, S65Sunlight[204]
TiO2Ramazol Brilliant BlueLa72Visible[204]
TiO2Gentian violetMn84Visible[194]
TiO2Acid Red 88Mo77Visible[194]
TiO2Rhodamine BP93Sunlight[205]
TiO2Methylene BlueFe72UV[205]
TiO2Methylene OrangeFe99UV[205]
Back to TopTop