Next Article in Journal
Investigation of the Influence of Rainfall Runoff on Shallow Landslides in Unsaturated Soil Using a Mathematical Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Groundwater Recharge Decrease Replacing Pasture by Eucalyptus Plantation
Previous Article in Journal
Tidal Flats Morphodynamics: A new Conceptual Model to Predict Their Evolution over a Medium-Long Period
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Hydrologic Alteration Metrics for Detecting Urbanization Impacts
Open AccessArticle

Model Uncertainty Analysis Methods for Semi-Arid Watersheds with Different Characteristics: A Comparative SWAT Case Study

College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Hydrological Cycle and Sponge City Technology, Beijing 100875, China
Shandong Academy of Environmental Planning, Shandong 250101, China
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Water 2019, 11(6), 1177;
Received: 26 April 2019 / Revised: 27 May 2019 / Accepted: 3 June 2019 / Published: 5 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hydrological Impacts of Climate Change and Land Use/Land Cover Change)
Distributed hydrological models play a vital role in water resources management. With the rapid development of distributed hydrological models, research into model uncertainty has become a very important field. When studying traditional hydrological model uncertainty, it is very common to use multisite observation data to evaluate the performance of the model in the same watershed, but there are few studies on uncertainty in watersheds with different characteristics. This study is based on the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, and uses two common methods: Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Version 2 (SUFI-2) and Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) for uncertainty analysis. We compared these methods in terms of parameter uncertainty, model prediction uncertainty, and simulation effects. The Xiaoqing River basin and the Xinxue River basin, which have different characteristics, including watershed geography and scale, were used for the study areas. The results show that the GLUE method had better applicability in the Xiaoqing River basin, and that the SUFI-2 method provided more reasonable and accurate analysis results in the Xinxue River basin; thus, the applicability was higher. The uncertainty analysis method is affected to some extent by the characteristics of the watershed. View Full-Text
Keywords: hydrological modeling; method comparison; SUFI-2; GLUE; calibration hydrological modeling; method comparison; SUFI-2; GLUE; calibration
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, L.; Xue, B.; Yan, Y.; Wang, G.; Sun, W.; Li, Z.; Yu, J.; Xie, G.; Shi, H. Model Uncertainty Analysis Methods for Semi-Arid Watersheds with Different Characteristics: A Comparative SWAT Case Study. Water 2019, 11, 1177.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop