Next Article in Journal
Climate Change Impact on the Frequency of Hydrometeorological Extremes in the Island of Crete
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Rainwater Harvesting Systems in Poor Rural Communities: A Case Study from Yatta Area, Palestine
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Physiological Factors and their Relationship with the Productivity of Processing Tomato under Different Water Supplies

Water 2019, 11(3), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030586
by Eszter Nemeskéri, András Neményi, András Bőcs, Zoltán Pék * and Lajos Helyes
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Water 2019, 11(3), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030586
Submission received: 4 March 2019 / Revised: 14 March 2019 / Accepted: 15 March 2019 / Published: 21 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Water Use and Scarcity)

Round  1

Reviewer 1 Report

Manuscript ID: Water-467225 - Review Request Reminder- Revised Version of water-431714


I send the revision form concerning the Manuscript entitled:  " Physiological Factors and their Relationship with the Productivity of Processing Tomato under Different Water Supply”

 

General comments


I examined the manuscript all the suggested changes have been carried out correctly, including text formatting, citation and reference list, figures and tables and their captions.

 

The paper can be accepted for publication after some minor revision:

 

-Page 3, line 106: Table 1. Available water for the tomato from planting to harvest. - change in: Precipitation and irrigation water during tomato cropping cycle from planting to harvest.

Available water is generally used to describe soil water reserve.

 

- Brix Value from Refractometer: use °Brix

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

 

I thank the possibility to resubmit the revised manuscript NoID: water-431714 by title Physiological Factors and their Relationship with the Productivity of Processing Tomato underDifferent Water Supply” for consideration by the Water journal.

 

We revised again the manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers and all minor changes are denoted by red colour in the revised manuscript.

 

Thank you in advance,

Zoltán Pék


Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This revised manuscript has improved. However, there are some linguistic errors remaining. Even though these errors are minor, these need to be corrected. Some linguist should go through this manuscript before it is published. I am unable to give a comprehensive lists but writing down couple of examples:

Page 6, line 183: The word 'weigh' should be 'weight'. A comma is desired after 'of fruit'.

Page 13, line 359: The phrase "significant lower" should be "significantly lower".


Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

 

I thank the possibility to resubmit the revised manuscript NoID: water-431714 by title Physiological Factors and their Relationship with the Productivity of Processing Tomato underDifferent Water Supply” for consideration by the Water journal.

 

We revised again the manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers and all minor changes are denoted by red colour in the revised manuscript.

 

Thank you in advance,

Zoltán Pék


Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop