Next Article in Journal
Zeolite as a Potential Medium for Ammonium Recovery and Second Cheese Whey Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Physics-Informed Data-Driven Models to Predict Surface Runoff Water Quantity and Quality in Agricultural Fields
Previous Article in Journal
Coastal Flooding Hazard Due to Overflow Using a Level II Method: Application to the Venetian Littoral
Previous Article in Special Issue
Why We Should Include Soil Structural Dynamics of Agricultural Soils in Hydrological Models
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Water 2019, 11(1), 135; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010135

Field Water Balance Closure with Actively Heated Fiber-Optics and Point-Based Soil Water Sensors

1
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, 21111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC H9X3V9, Canada
2
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 November 2018 / Revised: 6 January 2019 / Accepted: 8 January 2019 / Published: 13 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Soil Hydrology in Agriculture)
  |  
PDF [2293 KB, uploaded 13 January 2019]
  |  

Abstract

While traditional soil water sensors measure soil water content (SWC) at point scale, the actively heated fiber-optics (AHFO) sensor measures the SWC at field scale. This study compared the performance of a distributed (e.g., AHFO) and a point-based sensor on closing the field water balance and estimating the evapotranspiration (ET). Both sensors failed to close the water balance and produced larger errors in estimated ET (ETε), particularly for longer time periods with >60 mm change in soil water storage (ΔSWS), and this was attributed to a lack of SWC measurements from deeper layers (>0.24 m). Performance of the two sensors was different when only the periods of ˂60 mm ΔSWS were considered; significantly lower residual of the water balance (Re) and ETε of the distributed sensor showed that it could capture the small-scale spatial variability of SWC that the point-based sensor missed during wet (70–104 mm SWS) periods of ˂60 mm ΔSWS. Overall, this study showed the potential of the distributed sensor to provide a more accurate value of SWS at field scale and to reduce the errors in water balance for shorter wet periods. It is suggested to include SWC measurements from deeper layers to better evaluate the performance of the distributed sensor, especially for longer time periods of >60 mm ΔSWS, in future studies. View Full-Text
Keywords: soil water balance; actively heated fiber-optics; soil water storage soil water balance; actively heated fiber-optics; soil water storage
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Vidana Gamage, D.N.; Biswas, A.; Strachan, I.B. Field Water Balance Closure with Actively Heated Fiber-Optics and Point-Based Soil Water Sensors. Water 2019, 11, 135.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Water EISSN 2073-4441 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top