Next Article in Journal
The Peñalara Mountain Meteorological Network (1999–2014): Description, Preliminary Results and Lessons Learned
Next Article in Special Issue
Optical Properties of Biomass Burning Aerosols: Comparison of Experimental Measurements and T-Matrix Calculations
Previous Article in Journal
Ice Nucleating Particle Concentrations Increase When Leaves Fall in Autumn
Previous Article in Special Issue
Validation of MODIS-Aqua Aerosol Products C051 and C006 over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region
Open AccessArticle

Aerosol Optical Properties over China from RAMS-CMAQ Model Compared with CALIOP Observations

College of Geomatics, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266000, China
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Jointly Sponsored by Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth of Chinese Academy of Sciences and Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100101, China
State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, College of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmosphere Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2017, 8(10), 201;
Received: 6 September 2017 / Revised: 29 September 2017 / Accepted: 13 October 2017 / Published: 17 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aerosol Optical Properties: Models, Methods & Measurements)
The horizontal and vertical distributions of aerosol optical properties over China in 2013–2015 were investigated using RAMS (Regional Atmospheric Modeling System)-CMAQ (Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality) simulations and CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) observations. To better understand the performance of the RAMS-CMAQ model over China, comparisons with the ground-based Sun photometers AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network), MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometers) data and the on-board Lidar CALIOP were used for comprehensive evaluations, which could characterize the abilities of the model to simulate the spatial and vertical distributions of the AOD (Aerosol Optical Depth) as well as the optical properties for four seasons. Several high value areas (e.g., the Sichuan Basin, Taklamakan Desert, North China Plain, and Yangtze River Delta) were found over China during the study period, with the maximum mean AOD (CALIOP: ~0.7; RAMS-CMAQ: >1) in the Sichuan district. Compared with AODs of AERONET, both the CALIOP and RAMS-CMAQ AODs were underestimated, but the RAMS-CMAQ data show a better correlation with AERONET (AERONET vs. RAMS-CMAQ R: 0.69, AERONET vs. CALIOP R: 0.5). The correlation coefficients between RAMS-CMAQ and CALIOP are approximately 0.6 for all four seasons. The AEC (Aerosol Extinction Coefficient) vertical profiles over major cities and their cross sections exhibit two typical features: (1) most of the AEC peaks occurred in the lowest ~0.5 km, decreasing with increasing altitude; and (2) the RAMS-CMAQ AEC underestimated the region with high AODs in the northwest of China and overestimated the region with high AODs in the east–central plain and the central basin regions. The major difference in the AEC values of RAMS-CMAQ and CALIOP is mainly caused by the level of relative humidity and the hygroscopic growth effects of water-soluble aerosols, especially, in the Sichuan district. In general, both the column and vertical RAMS-CMAQ aerosol optical properties could be supplemented efficiently when satellite observations are not available or invalid over China in the applications of climate change and air pollution. View Full-Text
Keywords: RAMS-CMAQ; CALIOP; aerosol optical property; AOD; AEC profile RAMS-CMAQ; CALIOP; aerosol optical property; AOD; AEC profile
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, T.; Fan, M.; Tao, J.; Su, L.; Wang, P.; Liu, D.; Li, M.; Han, X.; Chen, L. Aerosol Optical Properties over China from RAMS-CMAQ Model Compared with CALIOP Observations. Atmosphere 2017, 8, 201.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop