Next Article in Journal
Seasonal and Botanical Influences on External Thermal Performance near Green Façades: CFD Simulations on a Reference Building Envelope in a Humid Temperate Climate
Previous Article in Journal
Seasonal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Soil Carbon Flux in the Vadose Zone of Sandy Land
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quiet-Time Rapid Subauroral Plasma Flows at High Northern Magnetic Latitudes in the Dusk Sector

School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2026, 17(4), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040341
Submission received: 24 February 2026 / Revised: 21 March 2026 / Accepted: 23 March 2026 / Published: 28 March 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Upper Atmosphere)

Abstract

Using satellite observations and computed variables, we specified 5 Subauroral Polarization Stream (SAPS) and 28 Subauroral Ion Drift (SAID) events observed in the Northern Hemisphere by spacecraft F18 in 2013. These SAPS-SAID flows reached supersonic velocities (2400–5200 m/s), were driven by westward E × B ion drifts generated by their underlying strong poleward meridional SAPS-SAID electric (E) fields (90–190 mV/m) and northward geomagnetic B fields, and developed at high (≥68°) magnetic latitudes, in the dusk sector, sometimes on the dayside, and mostly within the downward region-2 current suggesting their previous development. Within the deepening main trough, the poleward SAPS/SAID E field increased directly with the reductions in plasma density and conductivity, suggesting positive feedback mechanisms in progress. Across the highly inclined magnetic field lines within the subauroral flow channel, the eastward/westward zonal E field E × B drifted ions equatorward/poleward and yielded large upward/downward ion drifts observed by F18. Earthward energy deposition into the SAPS and SAID channels indicates magnetospheric electromagnetic energy generations in their respective voltage generators. Conjugate observations depict the large outward SAID E field (|EX ≈ 10 mV/m|) on 28 October 2013 and SAPS E field (|EZ ≈ 10 mV/m|) on 14 October 2013 developed at L ≈ 10 RE on a short timescale at dusk.

1. Introduction

The ionospheric subauroral region is located equatorward of the electron auroral oval and accommodates the subauroral main ionospheric trough (MIT) [1] situated on the same magnetic field line as the plasmapause [2,3], demonstrating their strong association. Due to the subauroral region’s low conductivity, created by the lack of electron precipitation, large poleward meridional electric (E) fields can establish themselves. By interacting with the background northward magnetic B field, these poleward meridional E fields generate electrodynamic zonal E × B drifts that drive ions horizontally westward (or sunward) alongside the dusk convection cell. Such subauroral flows have a lifetime of less than 3 h and appear within the main trough where the vertical ion drift is typically upward due to the collisional heat produced by the drifting ions and co-rotating neutrals [4]. Intense (>1000 m/s) and narrow (1–2° in magnetic latitude (MLAT)) westward ion flows are known as Subauroral Ion Drifts (SAID) [5,6,7] and Polarization Jets (PJs) [8]. Moderate (500–1000 m/s) [9] and broader (from 3–5° up to 10° in MLAT) westward ion flows are called Subauroral Polarization Streams (SAPS) [10]. According to early studies, SAID flows were most frequently observed near magnetic midnight during the substorm recovery phase [4,11], while SAPS flows were typically observed in the dusk magnetic local time (MLT) sector during geomagnetic storms and substorms [12]. However, recent studies show the first appearance of SAID during the substorm expansion phase [13] and SAPS during the main phase of severe storms [14], as well as the occurrence of SAPS in the midnight sector (00 MLT) [15] and in the extended dusk–midnight MLT range [16].
Although the development of SAID and SAPS is still highly debated, it is commonly agreed upon by the various traditional and modern generation theories that the poleward-directed SAID/SAPS E field (i) drives the plasma westward in the SAID/SAPS channel and (ii) grows and that (iii) the SAID/SAPS channel receives electromagnetic energy known as Poynting flux powering Joule heating [17,18]. Regrading characteristic (ii), such SAID/SAPS E field growth (a) is due to the positive ionospheric feedback mechanisms created by the enhanced recombination rates reducing further both the plasma density within the main trough and the already low subauroral conductivity [4,7] and (b) occurs in direct correlation with the above-mentioned conductivity reduction and via positive ionospheric feedback mechanisms [6,7]. These (a,b) lead to the development of a trough-in-the-trough feature [19,20]. By the traditional generator theories, SAID and SAPS development is explained with conventional and inherently slow mechanisms unfolding in a voltage generator [21] or current generator [6,7]. But the modern generator theories are based on unconventional mechanisms, which unfold in their respective magnetospheric voltage generators [22] where the Poynting flux is generated [23], and explain the development of SAID [24] and SAPS [25,26] as a fast-time process—occurring on a short timescale—and ~10 min after the onset of substorm expansion phase. However, SAID flows can even develop during pseudobreakups [24] or local auroral activations not followed by fully developing substorms [27]. Via field-aligned electromagnetic energy transfer, from the magnetosphere to the subauroral flow channel, the downward Poynting flux becomes transferred along the plasmapause that acts as a power plant in the magnetosphere [28]. Then, the downward Poynting flux becomes accumulated in the subauroral flow channel, where the electron temperature becomes elevated. Consequently, both SAID and SAPS have their respective emissions and optical features appearing as east–west-oriented arcs. These include the newly discovered Strong Thermal Emission Velocity Enhancement (STEVE) phenomenon [29] associated with both (1) the 400–730 nm continuous spectrum, where the peak emission is the 630 nm red line [30], and (2) the enhanced SAID flow, sometimes reaching an extreme magnitude [31,32,33,34]. Also, the long-known stable auroral red (SAR) arc [35] that is associated with 630 nm red-line emission and strong SAID/SAPS flow [36]. It is also well understood that the short-lived STEVE arc and the long-lasting SAR arc are closely related phenomena, as SAR arcs can transition to STEVE arcs and STEVE arcs can evolve into SAR arcs [37,38,39].
SAID and SAPS are prominent features of the subauroral region and have been intensively studied since their first observations by using various types of satellite measurements taken at various ionospheric altitudes and by ground-based radars. These studies show that SAID and SAPS develop (i) mainly during magnetically active times but also during magnetically quiet times and (ii) direct the electromagnetic energy from the magnetosphere to the ionosphere along the plasmapause. Poynting flux flowing into the SAPS channel is generated in the magnetospheric voltage generator (VGM) [23] and becomes concentrated at the interface of the oppositely directed large-scale Region 1 (R1) and R2 field-aligned currents (FACs) [17]. Poynting flux flowing into the SAID channel is produced in the inner-magnetosphere fast-time voltage generator (VGFT) [39] and is the manifestation of a new means of energy transfer triggering STEVE arc development [18].
Regarding large-scale statistical SAID studies, He et al. [40] investigated SAID flows for the first time based on an extensive database containing 18,226 SAID events observed by Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellites during the time-period of 1987–2012. Their results show (a) SAID flows maximizing at 22:30 MLT and 60 MLAT, (b) the majority of SAID flows located at 56–65 MLAT and 20–23 MLT, and (c) no SAID flows detected earlier than 17 MLT and higher than 70 MLAT. Their findings are in good agreement with the previous statistical SAID investigations of Karlsson et al. [11] and Figueiredo et al. [13] but differ from the early results of Spiro et al. [5] reporting SAID flows observed by the Atmosphere Explorer-C (AE-C) satellite before 17 MLT and at latitudes higher than 70 MLAT. More recently, Laakso and Pfaff [41] studied 200 fast drift events observed by the Dynamics Explorer-2 (DE-2) satellite. Over an 18-month time-period, these drift events were observed in all MLT sectors and at latitudes higher than 50 MLAT. However, the authors specified only the high-speed flows below 55 MLAT occurring in the pre-midnight sector as SAID flows.
Focusing on SAPS, Erickson et al. [42] used Millstone Hill incoherent scatter radar measurements collected during 1979–2011 encompassing two solar cycles. For magnetically quiet and moderate times (SYM-H ≥ −100 nT), the authors documented SAPS flows at 50–68 MLAT from 22 MLT through magnetic midnight to 06 MLT. The statistical study of Kunduri et al. [43] was based on Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) radar observations made between January 2011 and December 2014 during magnetically quiet times (−10 < SYM-H ≤ 10 nT; Kp < 3). Their results show that the quiet-time SAPS flows developed rarely, only 15% of the time, and preferred the midnight MLT sector in the 60–70 MLAT range, where the SAPS flows were weak. Wang et al. [44] used DMSP data recorded during the high-sunspot number years of 2002 and 2003 covering the 15–22 MLT sector. Altogether, 7760 SAPS events were specified. Quiet (Kp < 3) and active (Kp ≥ 3) times were investigated separately. In terms of MLT, up to 150 quiet-time SAPS events occurred in the 16–17 MLT sector. SAPS flows developed close to 70 MLAT at Dst ≈ 0, reached ~3200 m/s during active times and remained minimal (≤700 m/s) during quiet times. Landry et al. [45] used DMSP measurements collected during 1987–2012. Their statistical results show that under magnetically quiet conditions (AE ≤ 200 nT), moderate SAPS flows (~800 m/s) occurred from 18 MLT onwards and below 68 MLAT. He et al. [14] used DMSP measurements collected within the calendar years of 2000–2006 and investigated SAPS flows observed during 37 intense storms and 30 quiet-time substorms. Their quiet-time statistical results show that the quiet-time SAPS occurred during the substorm expansion phase’s onset, appeared first after 19 MLT, and their occurrence frequency maximized at ~21 MLT.
Statistical SAID and SAPS studies based on DMSP measurements are particularly relevant to this study. However, these SAID and SAPS statistical results are subjective because of the DMSP satellites’ mostly dawn–dusk-oriented orbits covering primarily the dawn and dusk MLT sectors. This leads to the apparent concentration of SAID and SAPS observations in the dusk sector. However, the recent study by Gallardo-Lacourt et al. [46] reported the unexpected development of STEVE arcs and enhanced SAID flows (~5000 m/s) measured by Swarm-A at ~440 km orbit altitude and at an unusually high latitude (>70 MLAT) at ~21 MLT. This unusual SAID-STEVE event occurred on 27 March 2023 and at ~10° magnetic latitude higher than the SAID-STEVE event’s usual location [47]. Furthermore, the unusual SAID-STEVE event was observed under magnetically quiet conditions and without any underlying substorm activity. These unusual features prompted new questions regarding the subauroral and magnetospheric dynamics underlying SAID and STEVE development [46,47].
In this study, we investigate quiet-time subauroral flows that were unusually strong and appeared at high latitudes. Under quiet geomagnetic conditions (−25 < SYM-H ≤ 25 nT; Kp ≤ 3), these subauroral flows were observed by DMSP spacecraft F18 close to and even higher than 70 MLAT and sometimes earlier than 18 MLT in the Northern Hemisphere during the high-sunspot-number calendar year of 2013. Our results show that the unusually strong subauroral flows (i) reached in the SAID channel up to 5000 m/s and in the SAPS channel up to 2500 m/s during quiet-time substorms and (ii) were driven by their respective strong poleward E fields, sometimes reaching 200 mV/m. Meanwhile, the earthward Poynting flux deposition locally maximized in the subauroral flow channel and often exceeded the auroral electromagnetic energy deposition. Occasionally, the unusually strong SAID flow was accompanied by an unusually strong downward drift driven by a large westward zonal E field in the SAID channel. Two sets of magnetospheric conjugate observations demonstrate the unusually strong SAID and SAPS flows’ fast-time development and their generations in their respective inner-magnetosphere voltage generators.

2. Materials and Methods

For investigating unusually strong subauroral flows and their topside-ionosphere plasma environments, we used multi-instrument data collected by the polar orbiting DMSP F18 satellite (~840 km altitude; ~101 min orbital period; ~98.7° inclination angle) along its sun-synchronous orbits [48]. These measurements were taken at high sunspot numbers (>75) during the calendar year of 2013, just one year before the 24th solar cycle peaked in 2014 (at ~170). At high sunspot numbers, when the scale height of the oxygen fraction (O+) is high, the plasma’s O+ composition at ~840 km altitude is high (>85%). Under these conditions, the Ion Drift Meter (IDM) functions well and without limitations, and the cross-track drift data are generally good quality [49]. Meanwhile, the Scintillation Meter (SM) providing ion density (Ni) data and the Langmuir Probe (LP) producing electron temperature (Te) values are not affected by the plasma’s O+ content and are regarded as good quality. According to F18 data availability, which excluded entirely the measurements of electron temperature (Te), we used the data of ion density (Ni; 1/cm3), cross-track ion drift measured in the horizontal (HOR) and vertical (VER) directions (VHOR and VVER; m/s), and magnetic (B) field deflection components (δBY and δBZ; nT). We also included the B field components (BX, BY, BZ; nT) for computing both the vertical (X) component of the static or DC Poynting flux (SX; mW/m2) and the meridional (MER) component of the ionospheric E field (EMER; mV/m) in spacecraft-centered coordinate systems. We followed the equation of SX = 1/μ0[(VXBZ − VZBX)dBZ-(−VXBY)dBY], where μ0 = 4π × 10−7 H/m, X = downward, Y = ram direction, and Z = antisunward (see Figure 1 in Huang and Burke [50]), as reported by Huang et al. [51]. In our presentation, we marked the Poynting flux vector as S since it is a vector directed parallel (‖) to the approximately vertical (i.e., radial) magnetic field [52]. We plotted the earthward-directed S data as positive (S > 0) values. In geodetic coordinates, we computed the meridional (X) E field based on the equation of EX = VZBY − VYBZ reported by Kilcommons et al. [52], where positive/negative EX is poleward/equatorward directed in the Northern Hemisphere. We also used the values of east–west directed EY = VXBZ − VZBX [52], which is a zonal directed (ZON) E field (EZON; mV/m), from the Madrigal Database. Since the accuracy of δB, SX, and E field components depends on the quality of DMSP data used, the computed values reported in this study are regarded accurate and reliable because of the good-quality high-sunspot-number DMSP data used.
For investigating the conjugate magnetosphere in the regime of near-Earth plasmasheet, we used a small collection of data recorded by the Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) A (TH-A) and TH-E satellites for the conjunction events of interest. In 2013, the three Earth-orbiting THEMIS satellites (TH-A, TH-D, and TH-E) completed their Tail Science phase with an apogee at ~12 RE on the nightside [53]. We used various types of THEMIS data including hot (up to 700 keV) electron density (Ne; cm−3) from the Ground Calculated Particle Moments (GMOM) suite, and ion and electron pressure (PiXX, PeXX; eV/cm3) and ion momentum flux (MiXZ; eV/cm3) tensors from the On Board Moments (MOM) suite. Meanwhile, the Electrostatic Analyzer (ESA) suite [54] provided the measurements of electron flux taken at various keV channels. E field components (EX, EY, EZ; mV/m) were provided by the Electric Field Instrument (EFI) suite [55].
Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES) orbit the Earth at 6.6 RE, observe atmospheric and meteorological phenomena, and monitor the Earth’s space environment [56]. For observing particle injections occurring near the conjunction events of interest, we used electron flux measured in various directions by GOES-13 at 275 keV and 475 keV and by GOES-15 at 40 and 75 keV.
Orbit data included spacecraft location in Geocentric Solar Magnetospheric (GSM) coordinates, L shell (RE), magnetic local time (MLT; Hr), Northern Hemisphere footprints in geographic [longitude (GLON), °E; latitude (GLAT), °N] coordinates, and geomagnetic latitude (MLAT, °N).
For observing the underlying ring current, geomagnetic, and auroral conditions, we employed a small collection of variables provided by the OMNI database. These include the high-resolution SYM-H (nT) index for observing ring current variations and specifying storm and non-storm time periods, the 3-h Kp index for monitoring the underlying geomagnetic activity, and the auroral AE and AL indices (nT) for specifying substorms additionally to the SuperMAG-published substorm lists of Newell and Gjerloev et al. [57] Forsyth et al. [58] that specify substorm onset times and locations.

3. Results

3.1. Rapid High-Latitude Subauroral Flows Investigated

We inspected the F18 line plots for the calendar year of 2013. Since the F18 particle spectrometer was working, we could observe electron and ion spectrogram images. Based on the equatorward electron oval boundary, we accurately located the subauroral main trough and correctly identified the intense subauroral plasma flows, which are listed in Table 1 and Table 2, appearing at high magnetic latitudes and within the main trough.
We identified 33 subauroral flow events altogether observed in the Northern Hemisphere by F18 in 2013. These observations were made during the months of February and October, in the dusk MLT sector, and near or higher than 70 MLAT. These events include 5 SAPS events (1 in February and 4 in October; see Table 1) and 28 SAID events (6 in February and 22 in October; see Table 2). All of these SAID and SAPS locations are mapped in Figure 1.
Figure 1a–f illustrates a Northern Hemisphere geographic map and a northern MLT vs. MLAT polar map where we plotted the locations of SAPS flows (square symbols in colors) and SAID flows (dot symbols in colors). For illustrating the alignment of magnetic field lines and the location of the magnetic North Pole, each Northern Hemisphere geographic map shows the modeled magnetic meridians (in blue) and the magnetic dip equator (in light magenta).
Figure 1a,b is for the month of February 2013 and covers one SAPS event and six SAID events. Figure 1c,d depicts 3 SAPS and 10 SAID events observed during 5–20 October. Figure 1e,f shows 12 SAID events observed from 21 to 29 October. We note here that all these events (i) are further illustrated in Section 3.3 with their respective line plot sets and (ii) are plotted together on the same geographic map and on the same polar plot shown in Section 3.5.
Overall, the northern geographic maps reveal that F18 tracked the intense SAPS/SAID flows mostly over the North American continent (i.e., in the longitude sector of the magnetic North Pole, where the offset between the dip and geographic equators is the largest) and in the European sector and occasionally in the Asian sector. Between these longitude sectors, the detections of intense SAPS/SAID flows were absent. This was due to the subauroral main trough’s absence on the dayside (~16 MLT) or weak presence on the nightside (~18 MLT) appearing shallow at lower latitudes and accommodating only a weak subauroral flow.
According to the MLT vs. MLAT polar plots, F18 made the SAPS/SAID observations on the duskside, between 16 and 20 MLT, and mostly close to and at 70 MLAT. But sometimes, the intense SAID/SAPS flows were observed at higher than 70 MLAT and earlier than 18 MLT. Such detections are marked by the dot symbol in green in Figure 1b, by the dot symbols in light red and light gray in Figure 1f, and by the square symbol in light blue in Figure 1d (see more details in Section 3.3).

3.2. Underlying Interplanetary and Geomagnetic Conditions

Figure 2 illustrates the underlying ring current/storm, geomagnetic, and auroral/substorm conditions with the time series of SYM-H, Kp, AE, and AL. Here, we marked the intense high-latitude SAPS/SAID detections (square/dot symbols in colors; shaded intervals in yellow). For indicating quiet geomagnetic conditions, we added the horizontal lines of SYM-H = ±25 nT (in red) and Kp = 3 (in dark blue). These reveal that the intense high-latitude SAPS/SAID flows were observed under magnetically quiet conditions. We also marked two substorm onsets (star symbols in red) occurring before their respective subauroral flows. Figure 2a covers the time-period of 3–13 February 2013, during which all the events (one SAPS and six SAID) were observed during non-storm substorms. Figure 2b covers the entire October month of 2013. Then, most of the events (four SAPS and 22 SAID) were observed during the late recovery phases of three consecutive storms and later on, under weak-storm substorm conditions. But on 29 October, the last two SAID events were observed during a non-storm weak substorm.

3.3. Characteristics of the Rapid High-Latitude SAPS and SAID Flows

In Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5, the latitudinal line plots are constructed with the DMSP data of ion density (Ni), meridional E field (EMER), ion drifts (VHOR and VVER), magnetic deflection component (δBZ), and Poynting flux (S). For each line plot set, we marked the region of duskside auroral zone (based on the electron particle data) along with the SAPS/SAID channel (square/dot symbol in color, shaded interval in yellow) depicted by the VHOR line plot. We note here that both the electron and ion particle data are presented as DMSP electron and ion spectrograms in Figures S1–S33 (see Supporting Information). Based on the basic definitions (described in Section 1), we specified the broader and weaker flows as SAPS and the spikey, narrower, and stronger flows as SAID. These line plot sets depict the rapid high-latitude SAPS/SAID flows within their own ionospheric settings. These SAPS/SAID flows appeared sometimes as newly developed but mostly as previously developed along with their characteristic trough-in-the-trough (marked as T-in-T) plasma density feature.
In the δBZ plot, where δBZ is an east–west (antisunward–sunward) component, we specified the duskside downward (↓) R2 current (in blue) by the positive δBZ gradient, the upward (↑) R1 current (in red) by the negative δBZ gradient, and the poleward-directed Pedersen current (JP; in black) within or near the SAPS/SAID channel. Since these are quiet-time SAPS/SAID events, the δBZ change (a) reaches ~200 nT only sometimes within the previously developed (or old) SAPS/SAID channel and (b) is small (≤100 nT) within the newly developed SAPS/SAID channel.
Regarding the underlying generation mechanisms, as our first assumption, we assumed fast-time SAPS/SAID development in an inner-magnetosphere voltage generator setting, where the newly developed outward SAPS/SAID E field mapped down along the magnetic field lines (threading the plasmapause) to the subauroral ionosphere as a poleward-directed subauroral E field. Based on the above-described δBZ diagnostic signatures (a,b), we specified the SAPS/SAID channel as newly developed or previously developed. As the newly developed SAPS/SAID channel forms in a voltage generator setting, the EMER line plot depicts the poleward SAPS/SAID E field that is a mapped-down outward SAPS/SAID E field developed in the magnetospheric voltage generator. We know from these previous studies [22,26] that a newly formed SAPS/SAID channel, developed in a voltage generator setting, appears without any significant underlying large-scale FACs, since the large-scale FACs’ development and flow take time in a newly formed magnetospheric voltage generator [39].
However, as Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 show, most of the enhanced high-latitude SAPS/SAID flows developed previously and appeared in the regime of ↓R2 current flown into the SAPS/SAID channel. As our second assumption, we assumed that the poleward Pedersen current became established in the previously developed (or old) SAPS/SAID channel. Here, the EMER plot depicts a net poleward SAPS/SAID E field appearing in the regime of ↓R2 current as the poleward Pedersen current-related poleward E field becomes established and adds to the poleward SAPS/SAID E field (i.e., mapped-down inner-magnetosphere outward SAPS/SAID E field) developed in a voltage generator setting. Furthermore, the Pedersen current-related poleward E field grows via positive feedback mechanisms in direct correlation with the decreasing Pedersen conductivity/plasma density [7]. Such poleward (SAPS/SAID) E field growth leads to the development of a trough-in-the-trough plasma density feature [19,20] within the main trough accommodating the previously developed (or old) SAPS/SAID flow.
Here, we describe the SAPS/SAID events shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 based on the above-described two assumptions.
We start with the five SAPS events shown in Figure 3a,b (see also Figures S1–S5 in Supporting Information). In each SAPS event, both the broader SAPS flow and the underlying wider poleward EMER (driving the plasma westward in the SAPS channel) appeared within the main trough. There, the westward SAPS flow streamed in the sunward direction, and the earthward electromagnetic energy deposition (measured by the Poynting flux) increased up to S ≈ 4.5 mW/m2. At each SAPS channel’s poleward edge, the oppositely directed ↓R2–↑R1 FACs connected via poleward-directed Pedersen currents, implying that these intense SAPS flows were old and developed previously in a voltage generator setting. Meanwhile, the increasing poleward Pedersen current supported the growth of the Pedersen current-related poleward SAPS E field. Therefore, the SAPS flow was growing and deepened the main trough by locally decreasing the plasma density. By also decreasing the conductivity, the growing SAPS flow created a trough-in-the-trough feature, implying positive feedback mechanisms in progress [4,7]. Since the vertical drift in the SAPS/SAID channel is typically upward (see details in Section 1), we highlight an interesting feature, which is the underlying downward drift. The underlying physical mechanism responsible for its development is described in detail in Section 3.4. But briefly, we mention here that in the 10 February SAPS event, shown in Figure 3a, the intense SAPS flow (VHOR ≈ 2000 m/s) was driven by a strong poleward E field (EMER ≈ 75 mV/m) and was underlined by a strong vertical downward (−) drift reaching ~1500 m/s in magnitude. In Figure 3b, the SAPS events of 5 October show the first appearance of intense SAPS flow (VHOR ≈ 2400 m/s) and underlying poleward E field (EMER ≈ 90 mV/m) in their strongest forms and their respective weakening (from 1200 m/s and 45 mV/m to 1000 m/s and 30 mV/m) during the next 3 UT hours. Meanwhile, the underlying vertical drift was typically upward and weak (VVER < 500 m/s).
Continuing with the 28 SAID events shown in Figure 3c (see also Figures S6–S11 in Supporting Information) and in Figure 4 and Figure 5 (see also Figures S12–S33 in Supporting Information), the rapid SAID flow appeared within the main trough as a latitudinally narrow (≤2°) fast westward ion drift (2800 m/s ≤ VHOR ≤ 5200 m/s) streaming sunward and was driven by its underlying strong poleward E field (90 mV/m ≤ EMER ≤ 190 mV/m).
In some of the intense SAID events like in the first event on 24 October shown in Figure 5b (see also Figure S29 in Supporting Information), the trough-in-the-trough feature appeared evidencing positive feedback mechanisms in progress [4,7] and mostly in the regime of ↓R2 current, implying that the SAID flow observed was old and developed previously in a voltage generator setting. However, some examples of the newly developed SAID flow are shown in Figure 4a with the 5 October event (see also Figure S12 in Supporting Information) and in Figure 5a,b with the events of 21 October (see also Figure S22 in Supporting Information) and 29 October (see also Figures S32 and S33 in Supporting Information). Within these newly developed SAID flows, their respective re-scaled δBZ line plots (with limits of ±100 nT) show only a shallow positive gradient (δBZ amplitude ≤ 30 nT). This is the signature of a minimal ↓R2 current flowing into the newly developed SAID channel formed in a voltage generator setting, where the strong EMER drove the westward ion drift. The EMER’s magnetospheric conjugate component developed in a fast-time voltage generator specified by Mishin [22,24] as VGFT. Finally, the S plot shows that within both the enhanced SAID channel and the duskside auroral zone, the earthward-directed electromagnetic energy deposition (depicted by the Poynting flux) increased locally. We also highlight some specific features shown in Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 (see details below).
For Figure 3c, showing the six SAID flows observed during 4–12 February 2013 (see also Figures S6–S11 in Supporting Information), we draw attention to the underlying vertical drift that was directed downward and was further investigated (see more details in Section 3.4). We also note the third SAID event (marked as dot symbol in green; see also Figure S8 in Supporting Information) occurring on 5 February at 71.83 MLAT (i.e., > 70 MLAT), where the earthward Poynting flux locally increased to S ≈ 4.75 mW/m2 and at 16.43 MLT (i.e., <18 MLT).
For Figure 4, showing the 10 SAID flows observed during 5–20 October 2013 (see also Figures S12–S21 in Supporting Information), we notice the underlying vertical drift that was mostly upward directed. We also note the 6 October event in Figure 4a (see also Figure S13 in Supporting Information). Then, the SAID flow (marked as dot symbol in green) reached VHOR = 4800 m/s because of the strong poleward E field (EMER = 170 mV/m) at 70.01 MLAT, where the earthward Poynting flux locally increased to S ≈ 9 mW/m2.
For Figure 5, showing the 12 SAID flows observed during 21–29 October 2013, we highlight the events of 21 October (in Figure 5a; marked as dot symbol in light red; see also Figure S22 in Supporting Information) and 29 October (in Figure 5b; marked as dot symbol in light gray; see also Figure S33 in Supporting Information). These two SAID flows were observed at 70.53 MLAT and 72.12 MLAT (i.e., >70 MLAT) and at 17.22 MLT and 16.94 MLT (i.e., <18 MLT) and reached VHOR ≈ 5000 m/s and VHOR ≈ 4600 m/s, driven by their respective large poleward E fields of EMER ≈ 190 mV/m and EMER ≈ 170 mV/m. Meanwhile, their respective underlying earthward energy depositions measured by the Poynting flux commonly reached S ≈ 5.5 mW/m2. We also note the earlier 24 October SAID event in Figure 5b (marked as dot symbol in purple; see also Figure S29 in Supporting Information). Then, the intense SAID flow and its underlying strong poleward E field reached VHOR ≈ 5400 m/s and EMER ≈ 185 mV/m at 70.41 MLAT (i.e., >70 MLAT) and 19.94 MLT. Meanwhile, the earthward Poynting flux increased up to S ≈ 4.5 mW/m2 within the SAID channel and reached only S ≈ 2.5 mW/m2 in the duskside oval.

3.4. Enhanced Downward Drifts Underlying the Rapid High-Latitude SAID Flows

Figure 6 is constructed for the six SAID events of February 2013 (see also Figures S6–S11 in Supporting Information). Then, the underlying cross-track vertical drift was downward directed and sometimes as strong as the rapid cross-track horizontal drifts (as shown in Figure 3c). Here, the line plot sets are constructed with the F18 data of Ni, VVER, and EZON. As before, we marked the duskside auroral zone and the SAID flow.
Although the zonal E field (EZON) data coverage is not continuous at subauroral latitudes, as indicated by the data gaps at SAID latitudes (dot symbol in color, shaded interval in yellow), Figure 6 shows quite clearly the sudden increase of westward zonal E field (EZON < 0) within the SAID channel. By interacting with the background geomagnetic B field, this westward EZON drove the plasma (via E × B drift) poleward within the SAID channel and downward along the highly inclined magnetic field lines. Therefore, this poleward E × B drift had a large downward (VVER < 0) component that was observed by F18. These EZON < 0 and VVER < 0 observations are in good agreement with the early study of Isaev et al. [59] reporting the abrupt increase in the westward E field (i.e., EZON < 0) in the main trough causing the F region plasma E × B drifting downward (i.e., VVER < 0). Such localized downward E × B drift increase can enhance plasma depletion within the trough/SAID channel by increasing the recombination rates [60] and by further increasing the SAID flow via positive feedback mechanisms (see details in Section 1). This is demonstrated with two exceptional SAID events, when the cross-track drifts equaled in the SAID channel: on 4 February shown in Figure 3c and Figure 6a and in Figure S6 in Supporting Information (VHOR ≈ 5400 m/s, VVER ≈ −5200 m/s, and EZON ≈ −35 mV/m) and on 12 February shown in Figure 3c and Figure 6b and in Figure S11 in Supporting Information (VHOR ≈ 3200 m/s, VVER ≈ −2400 m/s, and EZON ≈ −25 mV/m).

3.5. Statistical Results

Figure 7 shows the statistical details of the 33 SAPS/SAID events observed by F18. We investigated these events statistically in terms of location, time, and magnetic activity level by constructing column charts and plotting these variables against the number of events observed. Since most of these events are SAID events (28 out of 33), the statistical results are most characteristic of the 28 rapid high-latitude SAID flows observed.
In Figure 7a, the geographic map shows the locations of the 33 SAPS/SAID events (marked as dot symbols in red in the American longitude sector and in cyan elsewhere). There is an apparent gap between the geographic longitudes of 80°E and 220°E. Although F18 sampled all longitudes equally, the quality of measurements was not the same, and sometimes poor-quality measurements resulted in large data gaps in this section. However, the good-quality measurements clearly indicated that the intense SAPS/SAID flows were absent in this section (see details in Section 3.1). Therefore, the statistics of the SAPS/SAID events investigated are quite realistic.
Statistically, Figure 7b shows that most of the SAPS/SAID evets occurred in the (220–360)°E longitude sector, which is the northern magnetic pole’s larger longitude region. The rest of the SAPS/SAID events occurred in the (0–80)°E longitude sector, with a maximum of 3 out of 33 events at 0°E. Consequently, there was no intense SAPS/SAID flow observed within (80–220)°E at high latitudes. In terms of the Kp index, Figure 7c shows statistically that most of these SAPS/SAID events (23 out of 33 events) were observed under magnetically quiet conditions, when the Kp index was less than 1. Meanwhile, significantly less (4 out of 33) events occurred at Kp = 1 and at higher Kp such as at Kp = 2 (2 out of 33 events) and at Kp = 3 (3 out of 33 events).
In Figure 7d, the MLT vs. MLAT polar map shows the 33 SAPS/SAID locations (dot symbols in cyan and red) appearing near 70 MLAT and in the duskside: mostly on the nightside (>18 MLT) and sometimes on the dayside (<18 MLT).
Statistically and in terms of MLT, Figure 7e shows that most of the SAPS/SAID events were observed (18 out of 33 events) at 19 MLT and significantly less (8 out of 33 events) at 18 MLT. Importantly, some of the SAPS/SAID events were observed on the dayside (<18 MLT): at 16 MLT (2 out of 33 events) and at 17 MLT (3 out of 33 events).
In terms of MLAT, Figure 7f shows that the SAPS/SAID events occurred mostly at 67 MLAT (7 out of 33 events) and at 70 MLAT (8 out of 33 events) and less frequently at 68 and 72 MLAT (4 out of 33 events). Here, we indicated the L shell values, computed as L = 1/cos2(MLAT), for these magnetic latitudes. This illustrates that the SAPS/SAID events’ majority were observed at MLAT > 67° (31 out of 33 events) and thus were located at L > 6.5 RE, up to 11.6 RE at 73 MLAT. Therefore, the geosynchronous GOES satellites (orbiting at 6.6 RE and earthward of the plasmapause) were not able to observe the reconnection/substorm-related particle injections. This is further demonstrated with two sets of magnetically conjugate observations covering the 29 October SAID event (shown in Figure 8; see also Figure S32 in Supporting Information) and the 14 October 2013 SAPS event (shown in Figure 9; see also Figure S5 in Supporting Information).

3.6. Conjugate Observations of the 29 October 2013 SAID Event

Figure 8 shows a set of correlated magnetically conjugate observations depicting the 29 October 2013 SAID event. These observations were made by F18 in the topside ionosphere at 1.26 UT and by TH-A in the inner magnetosphere at 0.18 UT. We augmented the TH-A observations with TH-E electron flux data covering a similar time-period.
We note here that both the SAID location and the SAID event observed by F18 are also shown in Figure 1e,f and in Figure 5b (with the second-last line plot set), respectively, and also in Figure S32 (in Supporting Information).
In Figure 8a, the geographical map covers a larger region of the North American longitude sector. We plotted the F18 pass (in cyan) tracking the intense SAID flow (dot symbol in cyan) and the TH-A footprints of interest (in orange), which crossed the F18 pass near the F18-observed SAID location, and the foot points of TH-A-observed outward SAID E field (ESAID; dot symbol in orange) and rotating convection E field (EC; symbol diamond in orange). At that time, the GOES-15 footprints of interest (in red) were located near and equatorward of both the intense SAID flow and the TH-A footprints. This provides observational evidence that GOES-15 traveled on the earthward side of the plasmapause, within the plasmasphere, and therefore was not able to detect the particle injections occurring on the tailward side of the plasmapause observed by TH-A and TH-E.
Figure 8b shows the DMSP F18 line plots of Ni, VHOR, EMER, VVER, EZON, δBZ, and S. As before, we marked the region of the dusk auroral zone. These plots illustrate the intense SAID flow observed by F18 at 1.26 UT and 71.46 MLAT and its underlying E field components and plasma environment. This includes the deep (Ni ≈ 3 × 103 cm−3) main trough and the plasmapause (PP) depicted by the steep Ni gradient located on the trough’s poleward wall. Because of the absence of Te data, we cannot show the plasmapause’s Te signature appearing as a locally increased Te that is generally due to the locally increased downward heat flow generated by ring current energy dissipation [61]. Within the main trough, the SAID flow was intense (VHOR ≈ 3800 m/s) and appeared at high magnetic latitude (71.46 MLAT). In the newly formed SAID channel (shaded interval in yellow), the underlying poleward-directed meridional E field was quite strong (EMER ≈ 135 mV/m), developed in a voltage generator setting as indicated by the small δBZ amplitude (~25 nT), and drove the rapid westward drift (VHOR ≈ 3800 m/s). Furthermore, the net upward drift (VVER ≈ 500 m/s) was moderate, as the locally increased eastward zonal E field (EZON ≈ 7 mV/m) drove (via E × B drift) the plasma equatorward and upward along the steep magnetic field line, yielding a moderate upward drift component. This added to the typical upward drift driven by collisional heat produced by the drifting ions and co-rotating neutrals [4]. Meanwhile, the earthward electromagnetic energy deposition (measured by the Poynting flux) locally peaked within the SAID channel at S ≈ 3 mW/m2.
Figure 8c illustrates the MLT vs. MLAT polar plots with the underlying two-cell polar convection. We sketched the dusk cell (in blue) and dawn cell (in red) based on the SuperDARN convection map [62] generated for the time-period of 01:14–01:16 UT (shown also in Figure S32 in Supporting Information), when F18 observed the intense SAID flow. The underlying polar convection was characterized by a dominating dusk cell that crossed the magnetic midnight meridian and extended dawnward and by a smaller dawn cell. We also indicated (in dark green) the Heppner–Maynard (H-M) boundary [63] marking the polar convection’s low-latitude limit at ~71 MLAT. However, this 71 MLAT is a modified location that was specified based on the F18 particle data. We made this modification by moving the SuperDARN-modeled H-M boundary location of 66 MLAT to 71 MLAT in order to obtain a scientifically correct presentation. It is well known that there are inaccuracies associated with the SuperDARN-estimated H-M boundary that are due to the changing ionospheric propagation conditions [64]. Furthermore, as shown in Figure S32, the SuperDARN drift data do not show the SAID signature. This reflects the limitation of the high-frequency radar created by obscuring SAID-related fast flows or by data gaps [65]. We note here that all the convection maps generated for the 33 rapid high-latitude subauroral flows investigated are shown in Figures S1–S33 (in Supporting Information). We also mapped the F18 01-02 passes (in cyan) that were oriented in the nighttime–morning (22–10 MLT) direction and crossed the dusk cell on the dayside (<18 MLT). F18 observed the SAID flow on the nightside (>18 MLT), near the dusk convection cell, at 18.5 MLT and at 71.46 MLAT (i.e., >70 MLAT). We also plotted the TH-A ground track of interest (in orange) along with the foot points of the inner-magnetosphere rotating convection E field (EC; diamond symbol in orange) and outward ESAID (dot symbol in orange) along with the F18-observed SAID flow (dot symbol in cyan). We also mapped the GOES-15 footprints of interest (in red) that were located at ~60 MLAT and covered the 14–19 MLT sector. All these provide further observational evidence that the inner-magnetosphere outward ESAID (observed by TH-A) mapped down to the conjugate topside ionosphere as a poleward E field (i.e., EMER), near the F18-observed westward SAID flow. Thus, the outward ESAID (observed by TH-A) was the inner-magnetosphere driver of the intense SAID flow in the topside ionosphere (observed by F18).
In Figure 8d, the X vs. Z and X vs. Y orbit plots (in GSM coordinates) show the orbit sections completed by TH-A (in orange), TH-E (in magenta), and GOES-15 (in red) during their respective time intervals on 28–29 October 2013. Then, TH-A and TH-E traveled on the nightside of the Earth in the tailward direction and on the duskside, below the magnetic equatorial plane. There, the positive directions are sunward, duskward, and inward (or earthward). Along its tailward journey, TH-A observed the antisunward/duskward/outward SAID E field components (EX, EY, EZ) earlier (at 0.18 UT) and the rotating convection E field (EC) later on (at 1.64 UT). As TH-E traveled closer to the magnetic equatorial plane and more tailward, it was able to observe the nightside dispersionless particle injections unfolding before and when the outward SAID E field was observed by TH-A. These particle injections were not observed by GOES-15, which traveled closer to Earth, in the plasmasphere, from the dayside to the nightside and on the duskside.
Figure 8e illustrates the TH-E-observed particle injections with the electron flux measurements made between 82 and 740 eV at nine different energy levels and the orbit parameters of MLT and L. For a better presentation, we used the log scale for plotting the electron flux measurements and marked the times (in UT) of precious substorm onset (star symbol in red; shaded interval in yellow) and SAID E field observation (dot symbol in orange; shaded interval in yellow) made by TH-A. By traveling at high L shells (10.5 RE < L ≤ 11.5 RE) in the nighttime sector (20–21 MLT), TH-E was able to observe a series of dispersionless particle injections at lower energy levels (82–740 eV). Importantly, particle injections occurred when the SAID E field was observed implying its fast-time development (see details below).
Figure 8f illustrates the TH-A observations made under weak substorm conditions and during particle injections. We show the line plots of hot (up to 700 keV) electron density (Ne), hot (up to 300 keV) ion momentum flux tensor (MiXZ), E field components in GSM coordinates (EX; EY; EZ), electron flux measured at nine different energy levels in the 2.97–26.83 keV range, TH-A orbit parameters (MLT and L), AL index, and electron flux measured by GOES-15 at 40 keV and 75 keV energy levels in eight directions at each energy level.
To describe the main observations, we start with the Ne plot. As TH-A traveled on the duskside tailward, it first observed multiple Ne drop-offs that could be the signatures of the multiple plasmapause crossings TH-A made in the plasmasphere. Appearing as a broad Ne enhancement, TH-A observed the near-Earth plasmasheet earthward edge (marked as shaded interval in cyan), which is a region of a locally increased hot electron population, where the hot electrons are trapped (i.e., drift many times around the Earth [66]), that is bounded by the main plasmapause (PP; shaded interval in yellow) at the earthward end and by the trapping boundary (TB; shaded interval in light green) at the tailward end, separating the plasmasheet earthward edge from the distant plasmasheet [66,67,68].
On the main plasmapause (PP), TH-A observed the outward SAID E field between the charge separation created by the earthward-traveling hot electrons and ions. Shown by the plot of hot Ne, the hot electrons stopped at the PP. Shown by the MiXZ plot, the hot ions passed through the PP and locally peaked more earthward. This created a charge separation, where the outward SAID E field developed in a fast-time voltage generator setting (marked as VGFT). There, TH-A observed the net outward SAID E field’s components. These are the X and Z components pointing antisunward (−) as EX ≈ −10 mV and outward (−) as EZ ≈ −5 mV/m. Since the detection of the Y component was made in the dusk sector, at ~19 MLT, TH-A observed its rotation from duskward (+) as EY ≈ 4 mV/m to dawnward (−) as EY ≈ −10 mV/m at L ≈ 10 RE. From such a large L shell, the strong net outward SAID E field mapped down along the main PP to the conjugate topside ionosphere (to ~68 MLAT, as shown in Figure 8b,c) as a poleward-directed meridional E field (EMER ≈ 135 mV/m; observed by F18) and drove the intense westward drift (VHOR ≈ 3800 m/s) streaming sunward along the dusk cell in the SAID flow channel (observed by F18).
On the trapping boundary (TB), TH-A observed the weak cross-tail convection E field’s rotating Y component (EY) from duskward (EY ≈ 3.5 mV/m) to dawnward (EY ≈ −3 mV/m) along with the sunward (EX ≈ 7 mV/m) and inward or earthward (EZ ≈ 5 mV/m) components. Since the plasmasheet earthward edge is located on auroral field lines, the trapping boundary/rotating EY coincides with the diffuse-discrete auroral boundary [68]. Between the main plasmapause (PP) and the trapping boundary (TB) and thus within the plasmasheet earthward edge (shaded interval in light blue), TH-A observed weak cross-tail convection E field variations depicted by their sunward (EX > 0), duskward (EY > 0), and inward or earthward (EZ > 0) components located on auroral field lines [66,67]. Their ionospheric conjugates drove the auroral sunward convection flows duskward and sunward.
Illustrated by the electron flux measurements of TH-A, the magnetotail reconnection-related earthward dispersionless particle injections occurred not only tailward of the main PP (some of them are marked as shaded intervals in light gray and light green) when the AL index dipped during a series of substorms but even earthward of the main PP because of the multiple plasmapause crossings made by TH-A. Evidencing fast-time SAID development, occurring on a short timescale soon after substorm onset [22,24], the outward SAID E field was observed by TH-A during the substorm recovery phase at 0.18 UT as the substorm onset started at the end of the previous day (at 23.72 UT; marked as symbol star in red; see also Figure 2). TH-A made the SAID E field detection soon (half an UT hour) after the substorm onset. Meanwhile, GOES-15 traveled (at 6.6 RE) on the duskside but earthward of the main PP (located at ~10 RE). Therefore, the electron flux measurements made by GOES-15 within the plasmasphere show no signatures of dispersionless particle injections, only weak undulations. Possibly, a similar scenario occurred during the 27 March 2023 SAID/STEVE event reported by Gallardo-Lacourt et al. [46], when the intense high-latitude SAID flow developed at 69 MLAT (L ≈ 7.7 RE).

3.7. Conjugate Observations of the 14 October 2013 SAPS Event

Figure 9 is constructed the same way as Figure 8 and shows the 14 October 2013 SAPS event with conjugate TH-A and F18 observations and TH-E dispersionless particle injections. This F18-observed SAPS event can also be viewed in Figure 1c,d and Figure 3b (see also Figure S5 in Supporting Information). Because of the similarities between Figure 8 and Figure 9, we describe in detail only the new observations shown in Figure 9.
In Figure 9a, the geographic map illustrates the close locations of the F18-observed SAPS channel (square symbol in light blue) and the TH-A-observed outward SAPS E field (square symbol in orange) along with the GOES-13 ground track (in red) located just equatorward.
Figure 9b shows a moderate high-latitude SAPS flow (VHOR ≈ 900 m/s) observed by F18 at 70.28 MLAT and 2.64 UT within the deep main trough (Ni ≈ 4.1 × 103 cm−3), with the plasmapause (PP) located on its poleward wall, and the underlying poleward E field (EMER ≈ 30 mV/m) and weak upward drift (VVER ≈ 200 m/s). As shown by the oppositely directed ↓R2–↑R1 FACs, connected by the poleward-directed Pedersen current, the SAPS flow developed previously. This is further illustrated with the weak earthward electromagnetic deposition (S ≈ 1.8 mW/m2). Meanwhile, the small upward drift (VVER ≈ 100 m/s) suggests declining collisional heat produced by the drifting ions and co-rotating neutrals [4].
In Figure 9c, the MLT vs. MLAT polar plot depicts the SAPS flow (square symbol in light blue) location on the dayside at 17.49 MLT and just equatorward of the dusk convection cell. Later on, TH-A observed the outward SAPS E field (ESAPS; square symbol in orange) that mapped down to the dusk cell’s equatorward edge on the nightside to 19.91 MLT. These F18 (<18 MLT) and TH-A (>18 MLT) observations imply a continuous SAPS flow channel of inner-magnetosphere origin that had been flowing along the dusk cell for a while. Meanwhile, the GOES-13 footprints (in red) were taken equatorward of the polar convection cells, at 64.4 MLAT, in a broader region of the magnetic midnight sector. Furthermore, the previous substorm onset (star symbol in red) occurred just before magnetic midnight (23:23 MLT), within the dusk cell, at 72 MLAT. This substorm onset is from the substorm list of Forsyth et al. [58].
In Figure 9d, the orbit plots show that the tailward-traveling TH-A satellite observed the net outward SAPS E field’s outward (EZ < 0) and duskward (EY > 0) components below the equatorial plane and on the duskside. There, the positive directions are duskward and inward, respectively. Meanwhile, TH-E also traveled tailward and observed nightside dispersionless particle injections closer to the magnetic equatorial plane and farther away from Earth than TH-A. However, as GOES-13 orbited closer to Earth, near the equatorial plane, and from the duskside to the dawnside, it could not observe the substorm-related particle injections.
Figure 9e shows the strong dispersionless particle injections observed by TH-E at nine energy levels (between 82 and 740 eV) during both the substorm onset and the following SAPS event observed by TH-A. Then, TH-E traveled at high L shells (11.0 RE < L ≤ 11.5 RE) in the nighttime sector (21.0–21.4 MLT).
In Figure 9f, the TH-A line plots cover the 5 h time-period of 2–7 UT. These line plots are constructed with the data of spacecraft potential (SC Pot), hot (up to 300 keV) ion (PiXX) and electron (PeXX) pressure tensors, SAPS E field components (EY and EZ; in GSM coordinates), electron flux in the 2.97–26.83 keV range, and orbit parameters (MLT and L) along with the AE index, where the previous substorm onset is marked at 2.81 UT (star symbol in red) and the electron flux measured by GOES-13 at 275 keV and 475 keV channels in nine directions.
Based on the SC Pot plot, we marked the plasmapause (PP; shaded interval in yellow) and the trapping boundary (TB; shaded interval in light green) and between them the near-Earth plasmasheet earthward edge (shaded interval in cyan) along with the regions of the plasmasphere and distant plasmasheet (see details in Section 3.6). By mapping down to the diffuse-discrete auroral boundary, the TB separates the large-scale R1–R2 FACs [68]. This is shown with the PiXX plot depicting the increasing ↓R2 current flowing earthward, passing through the PP and peaking earthward of the PP, and with the PeXX plot showing the ↑R1 currents peaking at the TB. These PeXX and PiXX observations depict the charge separation created by the hot ions (depicted by the earthward-located hot ion pressure peak or PiXX peak) and hot electrons located near the PP (depicted by the hot electron pressure peak or PeXX peak at the PP). Between them, the SAPS E field components (ESAPS; shaded interval in yellow) developed across the PP in a magnetospheric voltage generator (marked as VGM) setting. We show the TH-A-observed net outward SAPS E field’s duskward (+) EY ≈ 6 mV/m and outward (−) EZ ≈ −10 mV/m components across the PP (observed at 3.36 UT and 19.91 MLT and located at 9.85 RE;) along with the weak convection E field components developed within the near-Earth plasmasheet earthward edge (see details in Section 3.6). Meanwhile, the TH-A-measured electron flux illustrates the substorm-related dispersionless particle injections occurring on the tailward side of the PP that were not observed by GOES-13 since GOES-13 was traveling on the earthward side of the PP, within the plasmapause.

4. Summary of Results

In this study, we further explored the unusual high-latitude SAID-STEVE phenomena first reported by Gallardo-Lacourt et al. [46]. We focused on intense SAPS and SAID flows, which occurred under magnetically quiet conditions and weak substorms at unusually high magnetic latitudes (>68 MLAT), and conducted a large-scale investigation. It was based on 33 subauroral flow events observed by DMSP F18 in the topside ionosphere during the high-sunspot-number calendar year of 2013 and on two magnetically conjugate events observed by TH-A in the inner magnetosphere while the earthward particle injections were observed by TH-E.
This study’s topside-ionosphere results show that F18 observed the intense 33 SAPS/SAID events at high northern magnetic latitudes (near and ≥68 MLAT) in the dusk MLT sector (sometimes on the dayside at <18 MLT) under geomagnetically quiet conditions and weak substorms. These 33 events included 5 SAPS events and 28 SAID events that allowed us to conduct statistical investigations. These documented their preferred development mostly under magnetically quiet (Kp = 0) conditions and during 18–19 MLT at 67 MLAT (6.5 RE) and at 70–72 MLAT (8.5–10.4 RE). With the individual multi-instrument F18 observations, we demonstrated the SAPS/SAID flows’ overall common features including:
(i)
The underlying strong poleward E field: 90–190 mV/m;
(ii)
The underlying strong zonal E field (max|EZON| ≈ 50 mV/m);
(iii)
The associated deep subauroral main trough (min Ni ≈ 0.4 × 103 cm−3);
(iv)
The trough-in-the-trough plasma density feature implying positive feedback mechanisms in progress;
(v)
The magnitude of ↓R2 current implying previous or recent SAPS/SAID development in a voltage generator setting;
(vi)
The locally increased earthward electromagnetic energy deposition along the plasmapause into the SAPS/SAID flow channel, measured by the Poynting flux (S ≤ 12 mV/m), implying the generation of electromagnetic energy in the conjugate inner-magnetosphere voltage generator and its subsequent downward/earthward channeling.
This study’s inner-magnetosphere results present two sets of magnetically conjugate observations demonstrating the fast-time development of intense SAPS on 14 October 2013 (see Figure 9f) and intense SAID on 29 October 2013 (see Figure 8f) soon after their respective substorm onsets. By invoking the fast-time SAPS development theory put forward by Mishin [22,25] and Mishin et al. [26], the inner-magnetosphere outward SAPS E field (a) is an integral part of the substorm current wedge 2-loop (SCW2L) system created by the tailward R1 loop and earthward R2 loop and (b) develops in a magnetospheric voltage generator (VGM). Figure 9f shows that TH-A observed the duskward and outward ESAPS field components (of the net SAPS E field) between the pressure peaks of hot ions and hot electrons near the PP (at L ≈ 9.85 RE). The hot ion pressure peak (depicted by the PiXX plot) was associated with the ↓R2 current loop and maximized earthward of the PP. The hot electron pressure (depicted by the PeXX plot) extended earthward to the PP, was associated with the ↑R1 current that maximized at the TB. The underlying substorm/reconnection-related earthward particle injections were observed more tailward by TH-E and at the PP and within the plasmasheet by TH-A. Near the PP, these hot ions and electrons—shown with the plots of hot electron pressure (PeXX) and hot ion pressure (PiXX)—created a charge separation wherein the net outward ESAPS developed in a magnetospheric voltage generator (VGM). From such a high shell (L ≈ 9.85 RE), the strong net outward SAPS E field mapped down along the PP to the high-latitude subauroral ionosphere as a poleward E field that drove the intense westward SAPS flow observed by F18 (shown in Figure 9a–c).
By invoking the short-circuiting theory first put forward by Mishin & Puhl-Quinn [69] and further developed by Mishin [22,24], the inner-magnetosphere outward SAID E field (a) is an integral part of the short-circuiting loop set up during magnetotail reconnection/substorm-related earthward plasma injections and (b) develops in an inner-magnetosphere fast-time voltage generator (VGFT). When the mesoscale plasma flows (MPFs) [70] are strong enough to pass through the plasma sheet earthward edge and to reach the PP, then the outward (or tailward) SAID E field develops at the PP. This is shown in Figure 8e,f with the dispersionless particle injections observed by TH-E more tailward and by TH-A near the PP and in the plasmasheet. Outward SAID E field development is due to the charge separation created by the MPF-related hot electrons that become stopped at the PP (as shown with the line plot of hot Ne) and by the MPF-related hot ions that keep traveling earthward and peak earthward of the PP (as shown with the MiXZ plot). Between the charge separation, the inner-magnetosphere fast-time voltage generator (VGFT) develops, where the mixture of hot ions and cold electrons provide resistivity [22,24]. All these TH-A and TH-E observations provide evidence that the strong net outward SAID E field, which developed on a short timescale, mapped down from L ≈ 10 RE to high magnetic latitude as a strong poleward E field that drove the unusually intense westward plasma flow (streaming sunward), as was observed by F18 (shown in Figure 8a–c).

5. Discussion

Our study is particularly relevant to the recent study of Gallardo-Lacourt et al. [46] reporting an unusual SAID-STEVE event observed on 27 March 2023 at high magnetic latitude, 68 MLAT, which is ~10° higher than the locations of SAID-STEVE events investigated by previous studies including the statistical study of Svaldi et al. [47].
Based on our findings and recently published results by other authors (cited below) and due to our improved understanding, we can both explain some of the high-latitude SAID features reported by Gallardo-Lacourt et al. [46] and answer some of the questions they put forward.
We start with the intense high-latitude SAID observation made by the Swarm-A satellite, as shown in Figure 2 of Gallardo-Lacourt et al. [46]. As also shown in our Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5, the connection of ↓R2-↑R1 FACs on the SAID channel’s poleward side implies the deposition site of earthward flowing Poynting flux [17], generated in the VGFT [71], which possibly created a novel mode of energy transfer associated with the STEVE arc [18]. Consequently, this provides observational evidence of the intense high-latitude SAID flow’s fast-time development in a voltage generator setting by short-circuiting [22,24]. Furthermore, the trough-in-the-trough plasma density feature shown by the Ne plot (in Figure 2 of Gallardo-Lacourt et al. [46]) provides observational evidence of the operational positive feedback mechanisms [6,7] that are essential to the generation of SAID-linked subauroral arcs [39].
Regarding the absence of particle injections, recorded during the high-latitude SAID-STEVE event observed on 27 March 2023 at 69 MLAT (L ≈ 7.7 RE), this was possibly due to GOES traveling in the plasmasphere (i.e., on the earthward side of the plasmapause) at ~6.6 RE. There, as also shown in our Figure 8, GOES could not observe the earthward particle injections associated with the fast-time development of the inner-magnetosphere SAID E field. Based on the auroral SuperMAG AL (SML) index [57], Gallardo-Lacourt et al. [46] concluded the absence of underlying substorm activity. It was correctly indicated by the SML index derived from a large number of ground-based magnetometer stations [57]. But Gallardo-Lacourt et al. [46] could not explain the intense high-latitude SAID flow’s fast-time development in the absence of underlying substorm activity. However, according to the study of Mishin [24], SAID can develop after pseudobreakups, when the earthward plasma injections (i.e., MPFs) are strong enough to reach the plasmapause and trigger SAID development via short-circuiting but not strong enough to trigger substorm development [71]. Consequently, the 27 March 2023 high-latitude SAID-STEVE event possibly occurred during a pseudobreakup.

6. Conclusions

From the observational results (listed as i–vi in Section 4), we draw the following conclusions for the 33 topside-ionosphere and 2 inner-magnetosphere SAPS/SAID events investigated in this study. During these events, the MPFs were strong enough (a) to reach the steep and well-defined plasmapause at large L shells (8.5–10.4 RE) and (b) to trigger the emergence of the ↓R2 current loop. These (a,b) triggered the respective fast-time development of a large outward SAID E field in an inner-magnetosphere VGFT generator (i.e., a) and a large outward SAPS E field in a VGM (i.e., b). These large SAID and SAPS E fields mapped down to unusually high magnetic latitudes (68–72 MLAT) on the duskside (16–20 MLT) as large poleward meridional SAID and SAPS E fields and drove the unusually strong westward SAID and SAPS flows streaming sunward
Thus, the root cause of the unusually strong topside-ionosphere high-latitude SAID and SAPS flows observed by F18 during the quiet-time time-periods investigated was their respective large outward inner-magnetosphere SAID and SAPS E fields developed at high L shells. In the topside ionosphere, the deep main trough and the positive feedback mechanisms created favorable conditions for the maintenance of the rapid high-latitude subauroral flows observed by F18 during the events investigated. Under such favorable conditions, but at geomagnetically more active times, such rapid subauroral flows are expected to occur at lower latitudes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/atmos17040341/s1, Figure S1: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAPS flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis oriented in the magnetic midday-midnight direction. Figure S2: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAPS flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis oriented in the magnetic midday-midnight direction. Figure S3: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAPS flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis oriented in the magnetic midday-midnight direction. Figure S4: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAPS flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S5: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAPS flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S6: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S7: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S8: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S9: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying highly irregular polar convection pattern characterized by a dominating dawn cell. Figure S10: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S11: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis oriented in the magnetic midday-midnight direction. Figure S12: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis oriented in the magnetic midday-midnight direction. Figure S13: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 10-22 MLT direction. Figure S14: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S15: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying highly irregular two-cell polar convection characterized by a dominating dusk cell. Figure S16: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S17: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 13-1 MLT direction. Figure S18: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S19: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis oriented in the magnetic midday-midnight direction. Figure S20: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S21: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S22: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S23: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 11-23 MLT direction. Figure S24: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis oriented in the magnetic midday-midnight direction. Figure S25: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis oriented in the magnetic midday-midnight direction. Figure S26: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 13-1 MLT direction. Figure S27: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis oriented in the magnetic midday-midnight direction. Figure S28: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 13-1 MLT direction. Figure S29: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 13-1 MLT direction. Figure S30: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 13-1 MLT direction. Figure S31: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis tilted in the 13-1 MLT direction. Figure S32: (top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying two-cell polar convection pattern with its convection axis orinted in the magnetic midday-midnight direction. Figure S33: ((top panel) The DMSP F18 survey plot shows the sunward streaming westward SAID flow at high magnetic latitude: equatorward of the auroral electron precipitation boundary. (bottom left panel) The SuperDARN convection map shows the underlying highly irregulat polar convection pattern characterized by a dominating dusk cell.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.H.; methodology, I.H.; software, I.H. and B.C.L.; validation, I.H. and B.C.L.; formal analysis, I.H.; investigation, I.H.; resources, B.C.L.; data curation, I.H.; writing—original draft preparation, I.H.; writing—review and editing, B.C.L. and I.H.; visualization, I.H.; supervision, B.C.L.; project administration, B.C.L.; funding acquisition, B.C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the United States Office of Naval Research under award number N62909-23-1-2057.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The DMSP data set can be accessed online through https://cedar.openmadrigal.org/list (accessed on 4 August 2025). The SuperDARN convection maps can be accessed online: https://superdarn.ca/convection-maps (accessed on 27 September 2025). The THEMIS and GOES data sets can be accessed online through https://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/cdaweb/istp_public/ (accessed on 15 May 2025). The Kp, AE, and SYM-H indices and the IEF EY and IMF BY and BZ components can be accessed online from the OMNI database: through https://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/cdaweb/istp_public/ (accessed on 7 August 2025). The SuperMAG provided various types of substorm lists can be accessed online from the SuperMAG substorm lists through https://supermag.jhuapl.edu/indices (accessed on 20 September 2025).

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge that this material is based upon research supported by the United States Office of Naval Research. We acknowledge the CEDAR Archival Madrigal Database for the DMSP data. The DMSP particle detectors were designed by Dave Hardy of the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL). We also gratefully acknowledge the THEMIS and GOES data. We acknowledge the World Data Center for Geomagnetism at Kyoto (http://wdc.kugi.kyoto-u.ac.jp/wdc/Sec3.html) (accessed on 7 August 2025) for providing the Kp AE indices and the use of SuperDARN convection maps (accessed on 27 September 2025). SuperDARN is a collection of radars funded by national scientific funding agencies of Australia, Canada, China, France, Italy, Japan, Norway, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. We also acknowledge the SuperMAG provided various types of substorm lists (accessed on 20 September 2025) determined from the SML index.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this article:
B fieldMagnetic Field
DMSPDefense Meteorological Satellite Program
E fieldElectric Field
ECConvection Electric Field
EMERMeridional Electric Field
EZONZonal Electric Field
ESAIDSub-Auroral Ion Drift Electric Field
EFIElectric Field Instrument
ESAElectrostatic Analyzer
FACsField-Aligned Currents
GLATGeographic Latitude
GLONGeographic Longitude
GOESGeostationary Operational Environmental Satellite
GSMGeocentric Solar Magnetospheric
H-MHeppner–Maynard
LL Dhell
MITMain Ionospheric Trough
MLATMagnetic Latitude
MLTMagnetic Local Time
NeElectron Density
NiIon Density
PJPolarization Jet
PPPlasmapause
R1Region 1
R2Region 2
SAIDSub-Auroral Ion Drift
SAPSSub-Auroral Polarization Stream
SARStable Auroral Red
SMLSuperMAG AL
SuperDARNSuper Dual Auroral Radar Network
STEVEStrong Thermal Emission Velocity Enhancement
THEMISTime History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms
TBTrapping Boundary
VGVoltage Generator
VGFTFast-Time Voltage Generator
VGMMagnetospheric Voltage Generator
VHORCross-track Horizontal Drift Velocity
VVERCross-track Vertical Drift Velocity

References

  1. Muldrew, D.B. F layer ionization troughs deduced from Alouette data. J. Geophys. Res. 1965, 70, 2635–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rycroft, M.J.; Thomas, J.O. The magnetospheric plasmapause and the electron density trough at the Alouette I orbit. Planet. Space Sci. 1970, 18, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moffett, R.J.; Quegan, S. The mid-latitude trough in electron concentration of the ionospheric F layer: A review of observations and modeling. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 1983, 45, 315–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anderson, P.C.; Heelis, R.A.; Hanson, W.B. The ionospheric signatures of rapid subauroral ion drifts. J. Geophys. Res. 1991, 96, 5785–5792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Spiro, R.W.; Heelis, R.A.; Hanson, W.B. Rapid subauroral drifts observed by Atmosphere Explorer C. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1979, 6, 657–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Anderson, P.C.; Hanson, W.B.; Heelis, R.A.; Craven, J.D.; Baker, D.N.; Frank, L.A. A proposed production model of rapid subauroral ion drifts and their relationship to substorm evolution. J. Geophys. Res. 1993, 98, 6069–6078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Anderson, P.C.; Carpenter, D.L.; Tsuruda, K.; Mukai, T.; Rich, F.J. Multisatellite observations of rapid subauroral ion drifts (SAID). J. Geophys. Res. 2001, 106, 29585–29600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Galperin, Y.L.; Ponomarev, V.N.; Zosimova, A.G. Plasma convection in the polar ionosphere. Ann. Geophys. 1974, 30, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yeh, H.C.; Foster, J.C.; Rich, F.J.; Swider, W. Storm time electric field penetration observed at mid-latitude. J. Geophys. Res. 1991, 96, 5707–5721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Foster, J.; Burke, W. A new categorization for sub-auroral electric fields. Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 2002, 83, 393–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karlsson, T.; Marklund, G.T.; Blomberg, L.G.; Mälkki, A. Subauroral electric fields observed by the Freja satellite: A statistical study. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103, 4327–4341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Foster, J.; Vo, H. Average characteristics and activity dependence of the subauroral polarization stream. J. Geophys. Res. 2002, 107, SIA 16-1–SIA 16-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Figueiredo, S.; Karlsson, E.; Marklund, G. Investigation of subauroral ion drifts and related field-aligned currents and ionospheric Pedersen conductivity distribution. Ann. Geophys. 2004, 22, 923–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, F.; Zhang, X.-X.; Wang, W.; Liu, L.; Ren, Z.-P.; Yue, X.; Hu, L.; Wan, W.; Wang, H. Largescale structure of subauroral polarization streams during the main phase of a severe geomagnetic storm. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2018, 123, 2964–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Clausen, L.; Baker, J.; Ruohoniemi, J.; Greenwald, R.; Thomas, E.; Shepherd, S.; Talaat, E.R.; Bristow, W.A.; Zheng, Y.; Coster, A.J.; et al. Large-scale observations of a subauroral polarization stream by midlatitude superdarn radars: Instantaneous longitudinal velocity variations. J. Geophys. Res. 2012, 117, A05306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, B.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, W.; Xing, Z.; Lyons, L.R.; Nishimura, Y.; Oksavik, K.; Wang, X.; Li, H.; et al. Simultaneous observation of duskside and dawnside subauroral polarization streams during an intense magnetic storm. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2025, 52, e2024GL114160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, J.; Lyons, L.R.; Knipp, D.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, C.; Shen, Y.; Angelopoulos, V.; Ma, Y.; Tian, S.; Artemyev, A.; et al. Poynting flux input to the auroral ionosphere: The impact of subauroral polarization streams and dawnside auroral polarization streams. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2024, 129, e2024JA032605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kunduri, B.; Baker, J.; Ruohoniemi, J.M.; Bailey, S.M.; Gallardo-Lacourt, B. An examination of magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere coupling during STEVE. In Proceedings of the AGU Fall Meeting 2022, Chicago, IL, USA, 12–16 December 2022; id. SA35B-07. Available online: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AGUFMSA35B..07K/abstract (accessed on 19 September 2025).
  19. Filippov, V.M.; Shestakova, L.V.; Galperin, Y.I. The band of rapid ion drift at subauroral F-region and its manifestation in high-latitude ionosphere structure. Cosm. Res. 1984, 22, 557–564. [Google Scholar]
  20. Stepanov, A.E.; Gololobov, A.Y.; Khalipov, V.L.; Golikov, I.A. Ion upward flows in the subauroral polarisation jet. In Physics of Auroral Phenomena, Proceedings of the XLI Annual Seminar, Apatity, Russia, 14–16 March 2018; Polar Geophysical Institute: Apatity, Russia, 2018; pp. 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Southwood, D.; Wolf, R. An assessment of the role of precipitation in magnetospheric convection. J. Geophys. Res. 1978, 83, 5227–5232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mishin, E.V. The evolving paradigm of the subauroral geospace. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 2023, 10, 1118758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mishin, E.V.; Streltsov, A.V. Subauroral geospace. In Nonlinear Wave and Plasma Structures in the Auroral and Subauroral Geospacer; Elsevier (S&T): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 481–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mishin, E.V. Interaction of substorm injections with the subauroral geospace: 1. Multispacecraft observations of SAID. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2013, 118, 5782–5796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mishin, E.V. SAPS onset timing during substorms and the westward traveling surge. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2016, 43, 6687–6693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mishin, E.; Nishimura, Y.; Foster, J. SAPS/SAID revisited: A causal relation to the substorm current wedge. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2017, 122, 8516–8535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fukui, K.; Miyashita, Y.; Machida, S.; Miyoshi, Y.; Ieda, A.; Nishimura, Y.; Angelopoulos, V. A statistical study of near-Earth magnetotail evolution during pseudosubstorms and substorms with THEMIS data. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2020, 125, e2019JA026642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Streltsov, A.V.; Mishin, E.V. Ultralow frequency electrodynamics of magnetosphere-ionosphere interactions near the plasmapause during substorms. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2018, 123, 7441–7451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. MacDonald, E.A.; Donovan, E.; Nishimura, Y.; Case, N.A.; Gillies, D.M.; Gallardo-Lacourt, B.; Archer, W.E.; Spanswick, E.L.; Bourassa, N.; Connors, M.; et al. New science in plain sight: Citizen scientists lead to the discovery of optical structure in the upper atmosphere. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaaq0030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gillies, D.M.; Donovan, E.; Hampton, D.; Liang, J.; Connors, M.; Nishimura, Y.; Gallardo-Lacourt, B.; Spanswick, E. First observations from the TREx spectrograph: The optical spectrum of STEVE and the picket fence phenomena. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2019, 46, 7207–7213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bailey, M.; Byrne, C.; Nezic, R.; Asher, D.; Finnegan, J. Historical observations of STEVE. Observatory 2018, 138, 227–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gallardo-Lacourt, B.; Nishimura, Y.; Donovan, E.; Gillies, D.M.; Perry, G.W.; Archer, W.E.; Nava, O.A.; Spanswick, E.L. A statistical analysis of STEVE. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2018, 123, 9893–9905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gallardo-Lacourt, B.; Perry, G.W.; Archer, W.E.; Donovan, E. How did we miss this? An upper atmospheric discovery named STEVE. Eos 2019, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nishimura, Y.; Dyer, A.; Kangas, L.; Donovan, E.; Angelopoulos, V. Unsolved problems in strong thermal emission velocity enhancement (STEVE) and the picket fence. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 2023, 10, 1087974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barbier, D. Research on the 6300 Line of Atmospheric Luminescence Nocturne. Ann. Geophys. 1959, 15, 179–217. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kozyra, J.U.; Nagy, A.F.; Slater, D.W. High-altitude energy source(s) for stable auroral red arcs. Rev. Geophys. 1997, 35, 155–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Martinis, C.; Griffin, I.; Gallardo-Lacourt, B.; Wroten, J.; Nishimura, Y.; Baumgardner, J.; Knudsen, D.J. Rainbow of the night: First direct observation of a SAR arc evolving into STEVE. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2022, 49, e2022GL098511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Parnikov, S.G.; Ievenko, I.B.; Koltovskoi, I.I. Subauroral Luminosity STEVE over Yakutia during a Substorm: Analysis of the Event of March 1, 2017. Geomagn. Aeron. 2022, 62, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mishin, E.V.; Streltsov, A.V. Toward the unified theory of SAID-linked subauroral arcs. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2024, 129, e2023JA032196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, F.; Zhang, X.-X.; Chen, B. Solar cycle, seasonal, and diurnal variations of subauroral ion drifts: Statistical results. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2014, 119, 5076–5086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Laakso, H.; Pfaff, R. Fast plasma drifts in the high latitude ionosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2023, 50, e2023GL103566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Erickson, P.J.; Beroz, F.; Miskin, M.Z. Statistical characterization of the American sector subauroral polarization stream using incoherent scatter radar. J. Geophys. Res. 2011, 116, A00J21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kunduri, B.S.R.; Baker, J.B.H.; Ruohoniemi, J.M.; Thomas, E.G.; Shepherd, S.G.; Sterne, K.T. Statistical characterization of the large-scale structure of the subauroral polarization stream. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2017, 122, 6035–6048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, H.; Ridley, A.J.; Lühr, H.; Liemohn, M.W.; Ma, S.Y. Statistical study of the subauroral polarization stream: Its dependence on the cross–polar cap potential and subauroral conductance. J. Geophys. Res. 2008, 113, A12311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Landry, R.G.; Anderson, P.C. An auroral boundary-oriented model of subauroral polarization streams (SAPS). J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2018, 123, 3154–3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gallardo-Lacourt, B.; Nishimura, Y.; Kepko, L.; Spanswick, E.L.; Gillies, D.M.; Knudsen, D.J.; Burchill, J.K.; Skone, S.H.; Pinto, V.A.; Chaddock, D.; et al. Unexpected STEVE observations at high latitude during quiet geomagnetic conditions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2024, 51, e2024GL110568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Svaldi, V.; Matsuo, T.; Kilcommons, L.; Gallardo-Lacourt, B. High-latitude ionospheric electrodynamics during STEVE and non-STEVE substorm events. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2023, 128, e2022JA030277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rich, F.J.; Hairston, M. Large-scale convection patterns observed by DMSP. J. Geophys. Res. 1994, 99, 3827–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hairston, M. Madrigal SSIES-2 Manual 2018. Available online: https://cdaweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/data (accessed on 26 February 2026).
  50. Huang, C.Y.; Burke, W.J. Transient sheets of field-aligned current observed by DMSP during the main phase of a magnetic superstorm. J. Geophys. Res. 2004, 109, A06303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huang, C.Y.; Su, Y.; Sutton, E.K.; Weimer, D.R.; Davidson, R.L. Energy coupling during the August 2011 magnetic storm. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2014, 119, 1219–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kilcommons, L.M.; Knipp, D.J.; Hairston, M.; Coley, W.R. DMSP Poynting flux: Data processing and inter-spacecraft comparisons. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2022, 127, e2022JA030299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Burch, J.L.; Angelopoulos, V. (Eds.) The THEMIS Mission; Springer Science+Business Media, BV: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. McFadden, J.P.; Carlson, C.W.; Larson, D.; Bonnell, J.; Mozer, F.; Angelopoulos, V.; Glassmeier, K.-H.; Auster, U. THEMIS ESA First Science Results and Performance Issues. In The THEMIS Mission; Burch, J.L., Angelopoulos, V., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bonnell, J.W.; Mozer, F.S.; Delory, G.T.; Hull, A.J.; Ergun, R.E.; Cully, C.M.; Angelopoulos, V.; Harvey, P.R. The Electric Field Instrument (EFI) for THEMIS. Space Sci. Rev. 2008, 141, 303–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Grubb, R.N. The SMS/GOES space environment monitor subsystem. In NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL SEL; NOAA technical memorandum ERL SEL42; Space Environment Laboratory: Boulder, CO, USA, 1975. Available online: https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/18586/noaa_18586_DS1.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2025).
  57. Newell, P.T.; Gjerloev, J.W. Evaluation of SuperMAG auroral electrojet indices as indicators of substorms and auroral power. J. Geophys. Res. 2011, 116, A12211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Forsyth, C.; Rae, I.J.; Coxon, J.C.; Freeman, M.P.; Jackman, C.M.; Gjerloev, J.; Fazakerley, A.N. A new technique for determining substorm onsets and phases from indices of the Electrojet (SOPHIE). J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2015, 120, 10592–10606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Isaev, N.V.; Gdalevich, G.L.; Benkova, N.P.; Gubsky, V.; Trushkina, E.P.; Kozlov, E.F.; Samorokin, N.I.; Stanev, G.; Teodosiev, D.; Samardjiev, T. Auroral electric field penetration into the middle-latitude trough. Adv. Space Res. 1987, 7, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rishbeth, H. On explaining the behavior of the ionospheric F-region. Rev. Geophys. 1968, 6, 33–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Titheridge, J.E. Plasmapause effects in the top side ionosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 1976, 81, 3227–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Thomas, E.G.; Shepherd, S.G. Statistical patterns of ionospheric convection derived from mid-latitude, high-latitude, and polar SuperDARN HF radar observations. J. Geophys. Res. 2018, 123, 3196–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Heppner, J.P.; Maynard, N.C. Empirical high-latitude electric-field models. J. Geophys. Res. 1987, 92, 4467–4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fogg, A.R.; Lester, M.; Yeoman, T.K.; Burrell, A.G.; Imber, S.M.; Milan, S.E.; Thomas, E.G.; Sangha, H.; Anderson, B.J. An improved estimation of SuperDARN Heppner-Maynard boundaries using AMPERE data. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 2020, 125, e2019JA027218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ponomarenko, P.V.; Menk, F.W.; Waters, C.L. Visualization of ULF waves in SuperDARN data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2003, 30, 1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Burrows, J.R.; McDiarmid, I.B. Critical Problems of Magnetospheric Physics, Proceedings of the Symposium, Madrid, Spain, 11–13 May 1972; Dyer, E.R., Ed.; National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC, USA, 1972; pp. 83–106. Available online: https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1972cpmp.conf...83B (accessed on 17 February 2026).
  67. Frank, L.A. Relationship of the plasma sheet, ring current, trapping boundary, and plasmapause near the magnetic equator and local midnight. J. Geophys. Res. 1971, 76, 2265–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Galperin, Y.I.; Feldstein, Y.I. Mapping of the precipitation region to the plasma sheet. J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. 1996, 48, 857–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Mishin, E.; Puhl-Quinn, P. SAID: Plasmaspheric short circuit of substorm injections. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2007, 34, L24101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mishin, E.; Sotnikov, V. The turbulent plasmasphere boundary layer and the outer radiation belt boundary. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 2017, 59, 124003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mishin, E.V.; Streltsov, A.V. Auroral geospace. In Nonlinear Wave and Plasma Structures in the Auroral and Subauroral Geospacer; Elsevier (S&T): Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 199–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The positions of the rapid high-latitude SAPS (square symbols in colors) and SAID (dot symbols in colors) investigated are depicted by (a,c,e) the northern geographic maps showing the modeled magnetic meridians (in blue) and dip equator (in light magenta) and by (b,d,f) the northern polar plots.
Figure 1. The positions of the rapid high-latitude SAPS (square symbols in colors) and SAID (dot symbols in colors) investigated are depicted by (a,c,e) the northern geographic maps showing the modeled magnetic meridians (in blue) and dip equator (in light magenta) and by (b,d,f) the northern polar plots.
Atmosphere 17 00341 g001
Figure 2. Constructed for the days of (a) 3–13 February 2013 and (b) 1–31 October 2013, the line plots depict the ring current conditions with the SYM-H index, the geomagnetic conditions with the Kp index, and the auroral conditions with the AE and AL indices underlying the 2013 subauroral SAPS events (square symbols in colors) and SAID events (dot symbols in colors) investigated (shaded intervals in yellow). Quiet-time conditions are indicated by the horizontal lines of SYM-H = ±25 nT (in red) and Kp = 3 (in dark blue).
Figure 2. Constructed for the days of (a) 3–13 February 2013 and (b) 1–31 October 2013, the line plots depict the ring current conditions with the SYM-H index, the geomagnetic conditions with the Kp index, and the auroral conditions with the AE and AL indices underlying the 2013 subauroral SAPS events (square symbols in colors) and SAID events (dot symbols in colors) investigated (shaded intervals in yellow). Quiet-time conditions are indicated by the horizontal lines of SYM-H = ±25 nT (in red) and Kp = 3 (in dark blue).
Atmosphere 17 00341 g002
Figure 3. The line plot sets of Ne, EMER, VHOR, VVER, δBZ, and S| show the rapid high-latitude subauroral plasma flows in their plasma environment (a,b) during the SAPS events (symbol squares in colors) of 2013 and (c) during the February 2013 SAID events (symbol dots in colors). The feature of trough in the trough is marked as T-in-T. The duskside auroral oval is indicated. The oppositely directed R1 (in red) and R2 (in blue) currents are connected by the poleward JP current (in black).
Figure 3. The line plot sets of Ne, EMER, VHOR, VVER, δBZ, and S| show the rapid high-latitude subauroral plasma flows in their plasma environment (a,b) during the SAPS events (symbol squares in colors) of 2013 and (c) during the February 2013 SAID events (symbol dots in colors). The feature of trough in the trough is marked as T-in-T. The duskside auroral oval is indicated. The oppositely directed R1 (in red) and R2 (in blue) currents are connected by the poleward JP current (in black).
Atmosphere 17 00341 g003
Figure 4. The line plot sets of Ne, EMER, VHOR, VVER, δBZ, and S| show the rapid high-latitude subauroral plasma flows in their plasma environment (a,b) during the 5–20 October 2013 SAID events (symbol dots in colors). The feature of trough in the trough is marked as T-in-T. The duskside auroral oval is indicated. The oppositely directed R1 (in red) and R2 (in blue) currents are connected by the poleward JP current (in black).
Figure 4. The line plot sets of Ne, EMER, VHOR, VVER, δBZ, and S| show the rapid high-latitude subauroral plasma flows in their plasma environment (a,b) during the 5–20 October 2013 SAID events (symbol dots in colors). The feature of trough in the trough is marked as T-in-T. The duskside auroral oval is indicated. The oppositely directed R1 (in red) and R2 (in blue) currents are connected by the poleward JP current (in black).
Atmosphere 17 00341 g004
Figure 5. The line plot sets of Ne, EMER, VHOR, VVER, δBZ, and S| show the rapid high-latitude subauroral plasma flows in their plasma environment (a,b) during the 21–29 October 2013 SAID events (symbol dots in colors). The feature of trough in the trough is marked as T-in-T. The duskside auroral oval is indicated. The oppositely directed R1 (in red) and R2 (in blue) currents are connected by the poleward JP current (in black).
Figure 5. The line plot sets of Ne, EMER, VHOR, VVER, δBZ, and S| show the rapid high-latitude subauroral plasma flows in their plasma environment (a,b) during the 21–29 October 2013 SAID events (symbol dots in colors). The feature of trough in the trough is marked as T-in-T. The duskside auroral oval is indicated. The oppositely directed R1 (in red) and R2 (in blue) currents are connected by the poleward JP current (in black).
Atmosphere 17 00341 g005
Figure 6. The line plot sets of Ne, VVER, and EZON show the strong downward drifts and their westward E field drivers developed in the SAID events (symbol dots in colors; shaded intervals in yellow) of (a) 4–5 February 2013 and (b) 6–12 February 2013. The duskside auroral oval is indicated.
Figure 6. The line plot sets of Ne, VVER, and EZON show the strong downward drifts and their westward E field drivers developed in the SAID events (symbol dots in colors; shaded intervals in yellow) of (a) 4–5 February 2013 and (b) 6–12 February 2013. The duskside auroral oval is indicated.
Atmosphere 17 00341 g006
Figure 7. The (a) geographic map and (d) polar plot show the locations of all the rapid high-latitude subauroral flows (symbol dots in red and blue) observed in 2013. The column charts (b,c,e,f) depict their statistics.
Figure 7. The (a) geographic map and (d) polar plot show the locations of all the rapid high-latitude subauroral flows (symbol dots in red and blue) observed in 2013. The column charts (b,c,e,f) depict their statistics.
Atmosphere 17 00341 g007
Figure 8. The magnetically conjugate observations of the 29 October 2013 SAID event are illustrated. The (a) northern geographical map and (c) polar plot shows the F18 (cyan), TH-A (orange), and GOES-15 (red) ground tracks along with the SAID E field (ESAID; dot symbol in orange) and convection E field (EC; diamond symbol in orange). (b) The F18 line plots of Ne, VHOR, EMER, VVER, EZON, δBZ, and S| show the SAD flow in its topside ionosphere plasma environment along with the underlying oppositely directed R1 (in red) and R2 (in blue) currents connected by the poleward JP current (in black). (d) The orbit plots illustrate the orbit section completed by GOES-15 (red), TH-A (orange), and TH-E (magenta) along with the positions of the SAID E field (ESAID; dot symbol in orange) and convection E field (EC; diamond symbol in orange). (e) The TH-E measured electron flux line plots depict the dispersionless particle injections that occurred before and after the substorm onset (symbol star in red) and during the SAID event (dot symbol in orange) along with the orbit parameters of MLT and L. (f) The TH-A line plots of hot Ne, hot ion momentum MiXZ, E field components, electron flux, orbit parameters of MLT and L, and AL index along with the electron flux (in colors) measured by GOES-15. The shaded intervals mark the SAID channel (in yellow), the near-Earth plasma sheet (in cyan and light blue), and the trapping boundary (TB; in light green).
Figure 8. The magnetically conjugate observations of the 29 October 2013 SAID event are illustrated. The (a) northern geographical map and (c) polar plot shows the F18 (cyan), TH-A (orange), and GOES-15 (red) ground tracks along with the SAID E field (ESAID; dot symbol in orange) and convection E field (EC; diamond symbol in orange). (b) The F18 line plots of Ne, VHOR, EMER, VVER, EZON, δBZ, and S| show the SAD flow in its topside ionosphere plasma environment along with the underlying oppositely directed R1 (in red) and R2 (in blue) currents connected by the poleward JP current (in black). (d) The orbit plots illustrate the orbit section completed by GOES-15 (red), TH-A (orange), and TH-E (magenta) along with the positions of the SAID E field (ESAID; dot symbol in orange) and convection E field (EC; diamond symbol in orange). (e) The TH-E measured electron flux line plots depict the dispersionless particle injections that occurred before and after the substorm onset (symbol star in red) and during the SAID event (dot symbol in orange) along with the orbit parameters of MLT and L. (f) The TH-A line plots of hot Ne, hot ion momentum MiXZ, E field components, electron flux, orbit parameters of MLT and L, and AL index along with the electron flux (in colors) measured by GOES-15. The shaded intervals mark the SAID channel (in yellow), the near-Earth plasma sheet (in cyan and light blue), and the trapping boundary (TB; in light green).
Atmosphere 17 00341 g008
Figure 9. The magnetically conjugate observations of the 14 October 2013 SAPS event are illustrated. The (a) northern geographical map and (c) polar plot shows the F18 (in light blue), TH-A (in orange), and GOES-13 (in red) ground tracks along with the SAPS E field (ESAPS; square symbol in orange). (b) The F18 line plots of Ne, VHOR, EMER, VVER, δBZ, and S| show the SAPS flow in its topside ionosphere plasma environment along with the underlying oppositely directed R1 (in red) and R2 (in blue) currents connected by the poleward JP current (in black). (d) The orbit plots illustrate the orbit section completed by GOES-13 (in red), TH-A (in orange), and TH-E (in magenta) along with the positions of the SAPS E field (ESAPS; dot symbol in orange). (e) The TH-E measured electron flux line plots depict the dispersionless particle injections that occurred before, during, and after the substorm onset (symbol star in red) and during the SAPS event (square symbol in orange) along with the orbit parameters of MLT and L. (f) The TH-A line plots of spacecraft potential (SC Pot), hot ion (PiXX) and electron (PeXX) pressure, SAPS E field components, electron flux, orbit parameters of MLT and L, and AE index along with the electron flux measured by GOES-13. The shaded intervals mark the SAPS channel (in yellow), the near-Earth plasma sheet (in cyan and light blue), and the trapping boundary (TB; in light green).
Figure 9. The magnetically conjugate observations of the 14 October 2013 SAPS event are illustrated. The (a) northern geographical map and (c) polar plot shows the F18 (in light blue), TH-A (in orange), and GOES-13 (in red) ground tracks along with the SAPS E field (ESAPS; square symbol in orange). (b) The F18 line plots of Ne, VHOR, EMER, VVER, δBZ, and S| show the SAPS flow in its topside ionosphere plasma environment along with the underlying oppositely directed R1 (in red) and R2 (in blue) currents connected by the poleward JP current (in black). (d) The orbit plots illustrate the orbit section completed by GOES-13 (in red), TH-A (in orange), and TH-E (in magenta) along with the positions of the SAPS E field (ESAPS; dot symbol in orange). (e) The TH-E measured electron flux line plots depict the dispersionless particle injections that occurred before, during, and after the substorm onset (symbol star in red) and during the SAPS event (square symbol in orange) along with the orbit parameters of MLT and L. (f) The TH-A line plots of spacecraft potential (SC Pot), hot ion (PiXX) and electron (PeXX) pressure, SAPS E field components, electron flux, orbit parameters of MLT and L, and AE index along with the electron flux measured by GOES-13. The shaded intervals mark the SAPS channel (in yellow), the near-Earth plasma sheet (in cyan and light blue), and the trapping boundary (TB; in light green).
Atmosphere 17 00341 g009
Table 1. Rapid high-latitude westward SAPS flows and associated variables.
Table 1. Rapid high-latitude westward SAPS flows and associated variables.
Westward SAPS EventsPlasma Variables
Event No.Event DateUT (Hr:Mn)MLAT (°N)MLT (Hr:Mn)Ni 103 (cm−3)VHOR (m/s)EMER (mV/m)
110 February 201302:0670.4317:361.2200073
25 October 201319:4971.3019:412.1240089
35 October 201321:3072.1520:043.5140045
45 October 201323:1171.9219:453.5100030
514 October 201302:3870.2817:294.190030
Table 2. Rapid high-latitude westward SAID flows and associated variables.
Table 2. Rapid high-latitude westward SAID flows and associated variables.
Westward SAID EventsPlasma Variables
Event No.Event DateUT (Hr:Mn)MLAT (°N)MLT (Hr:Mn)Ni 103 (cm−3)VHOR (m/s)EMER (mV/m)
14 February 201323:4370.6919:190.45400150
25 February 201301:2570.6318:091.02800100
35 February 201303:1071.8316:251.23000115
46 February 201301:1371.3918:151.53000105
511 February 201320:1967.0419:450.64000140
612 February 201301:4067.5818:160.73200125
75 October 201318:0970.8819:381.14000140
86 October 201317:5570.0119:361.05000160
97 October 201319:2365.3719:561.04200140
108 October 201300:2768.9619:191.92950150
1112 October 201318:2266.9119:451.25200170
1213 October 201301:0767.6518:581.02600100
1313 October 201318:1168.9919:411.3250090
1419 October 201318:3268.3219:480.65300170
1520 October 201321:4868.5120:120.83800140
1620 October 201323:2969.0619:481.1280095
1721 October 201303:1370.5317:131.05000195
1821 October 201302:5371.4518:481.54000150
1922 October 201312:5467.9718:422.04200160
2022 October 201314:5167.4719:001.02800110
2122 October 201316:1867.6519:191.9380090
2222 October 201318:1267.8319:411.54800170
2323 October 201322:5372.3819:522.05200190
2424 October 201300:3573.1818:502.05400150
2524 October 201319:1970.4119:561.45400185
2624 October 201322:4172.0019:572.54600170
2729 October 201301:1571.4618:303.03800135
2829 October 201302:5872.1216:562.55600170
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Horvath, I.; Lovell, B.C. Quiet-Time Rapid Subauroral Plasma Flows at High Northern Magnetic Latitudes in the Dusk Sector. Atmosphere 2026, 17, 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040341

AMA Style

Horvath I, Lovell BC. Quiet-Time Rapid Subauroral Plasma Flows at High Northern Magnetic Latitudes in the Dusk Sector. Atmosphere. 2026; 17(4):341. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040341

Chicago/Turabian Style

Horvath, Ildiko, and Brian C. Lovell. 2026. "Quiet-Time Rapid Subauroral Plasma Flows at High Northern Magnetic Latitudes in the Dusk Sector" Atmosphere 17, no. 4: 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040341

APA Style

Horvath, I., & Lovell, B. C. (2026). Quiet-Time Rapid Subauroral Plasma Flows at High Northern Magnetic Latitudes in the Dusk Sector. Atmosphere, 17(4), 341. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17040341

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop