Next Article in Journal
Community-Engaged Use of Low-Cost Sensors to Assess the Spatial Distribution of PM2.5 Concentrations across Disadvantaged Communities: Results from a Pilot Study in Santa Ana, CA
Next Article in Special Issue
Variation and Driving Factor of Aerosol Optical Depth over the South China Sea from 1980 to 2020
Previous Article in Journal
Bandung Rainfall Forecast and Its Relationship with Niño 3.4 Using Nonlinear Autoregressive Exogenous Neural Network
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Carbon Emission Trading on Companies’ Market Value: Evidence from Listed Companies in China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Atmosphere
Volume 13
Issue 2
10.3390/atmos13020303
atmosphere-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Combustion Boundary Conditions and n-Butanol on Surrogate Diesel Fuel HCCI Combustion and Emission Based on Two-Stroke Diesel Engine

by
Shiye Wang
1,
Jundong Zhang
1,* and
Li Yao
2,*
1
Marine Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
2
Merchant Marine College, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2022, 13(2), 303; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020303
Submission received: 11 January 2022 / Revised: 5 February 2022 / Accepted: 8 February 2022 / Published: 10 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Pollution in China)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The combustion and emission characteristics of surrogate diesel fuel homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) with different combustion boundary conditions and n-butanol (NB) mixing ratios are studied in this work. Engine data of a two-stroke low-speed direct-injection marine diesel engine were selected for the reactor. HCCI combustion was achieved by compressing a completely homogeneous mixture of fuel and air. The results show that NO emissions decrease slightly with the increase of initial boundary pressure at a constant equivalence ratio and initial temperature. In addition, the different initial boundary temperature has little effect on NO emission. The results also indicate that the ignition delay time of the mixed fuel rises with the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio. The emissions and reaction rate of NOx reduce significantly with the increase of n-butanol percentage in surrogate diesel fuel and n-butanol mixing combustion at a constant equivalence ratio and total mole fraction. Meanwhile, CO2 emissions also decrease significantly with the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio.

1. Introduction

The development of society and the economy is inseparable from energy. The demand for energy is increasing constantly in the current society, and the rapid consumption of fossil fuels has caused people to face a serious energy crisis. Therefore, people develop and explore new renewable and efficient fossil fuel alternative energy sources to deal with the increasingly severe energy problem [1,2,3]. At the same time, the massive burning of fossil fuels has also brought serious pollution problems. Large amounts of CO2 and thermal NOx are produced when the engine burns fossil fuels. NO and NO2 are the two most important harmful pollutants in thermal NOx produced by combustion [4,5,6]. In order to alleviate the serious environmental damage caused by fossil fuels combustion, various countries have formulated different measures to control the exhaust emissions of diesel engines strictly. The European Parliament plans to limit greenhouse gas emissions to deal with the serious problem of global warming and strive to achieve the goal of reducing more than 80% in 2050 [7]. The British Parliament passed an amendment in 2019 to achieve a net zero emission target by 2050. The French National Assembly had already incorporated a net zero target into law in June 2019. Therefore, the development and utilization of new renewable clean energy is receiving more and more attention.
N-heptane is often selected as a surrogate diesel fuel in previous simulations of diesel engines [8,9,10]. However, the carbon chain of actual diesel fuel is longer than that of n-heptane fuel, and the number of carbon atoms is about 10 to 25 [11]. The composition of diesel is complicated, and it is difficult to reproduce the combustion chemistry characteristics of diesel under low-temperature combustion through a single component represented by n-heptane. N-dodecane is considered to be a closer alternative fuel to diesel than n-heptane. Earlier, Luo et al. developed a simplified one-component diesel substitute (pure n-dodecane) to simulate diesel engines [12]. However, the mechanism of n-dodecane lacks alkylbenzene, which is an important component in diesel. It cannot reflect the real combustion of diesel well. Then, Pei et al. developed a diesel substitution mechanism (consisting of 77% n-dodecane and 23% m-xylene) on this basis and compared it with the experimental data of shock tube. Research has found that the mixture of m-xylene and n-dodecane can represent the combustion and emission characteristics of diesel fuel better than pure n-dodecane [13].
Oxygenated fuel can reduce PM and soot emissions significantly in diesel engine combustion [14,15,16,17,18,19]. At the same time, some oxygenated fuels are renewable. Oxygenated fuel can be used as a single fuel or mixed with diesel in a certain proportion. Therefore, oxyfuel is an ideal substitute for fossil energy. As a representative of the new generation of oxygenated fuel, the development and application of n-butanol (C4H10O) have attracted the extensive attention of scholars [20,21]. N-butanol has less corrosiveness and high safety. As an oxygenated fuel, burning n-butanol can reduce soot emissions effectively. The viscosity of n-butanol is lower than that of diesel, and it has better mutual solubility with diesel. The mixed combustion of n-butanol and diesel can be realized on the diesel engine with small changes to the engine [22,23,24,25]. In terms of environmental protection, n-butanol can be produced by biological methods, which can solve the problem of large fossil fuel consumption effectively. The renewability of n-butanol has high research value and wide application prospects.
As a new type of combustion concept, HCCI combustion has low NOx emissions and high combustion heat efficiency compared to traditional gasoline and diesel engines [26,27,28]. Analyzing the fuel combustion reaction rate through chemical reaction kinetics and controlling the ignition strategy of the engine are the most important contents in HCCI combustion [29]. A single fuel or fuel mixture can be used to control the ignition of different types of engines and the chemical reaction rates of the fuel in HCCI combustion process [30,31,32]. At present, a variety of fuels including biodiesel, n-butanol and n-heptane have been used in HCCI engines for research [33,34,35,36,37].
Therefore, the purpose of the study is to apply the HCCI combustion method to a marine diesel engine and reduce engine emissions of diesel. The method of reducing engine emissions in diesel surrogate fuel (77% n-dodecane and 23% m-xylene mixture) HCCI combustion by mixing with n-butanol in a two-stroke diesel engine is first proposed in the research.

2. Kinetic Models and Methods

The IC engine module in the CHEMKIN-PRO software is used to simulate a low-speed two-stroke diesel engine HCCI combustion. The selected model is the B&W 6S70MC engine produced by MAN. This research combines the parameters of this engine model with closed internal combustion on engine simulator and applies the HCCI combustion method to a marine diesel engine to study the effects of n-butanol on diesel surrogate fuel HCCI combustion and emission characteristics. The fuel is completely homogeneously mixed with the air during the intake and compression strokes to form a lean, homogeneous mixture. When the piston is compressed to the vicinity of the TDC, the combustion of the mixed gas in the cylinder is realized by the self-ignition of the air-fuel mixture. Table 1 shows the main technical parameters of the diesel engine [38].
The diesel surrogate fuel (77% n-dodecane and 23% m-xylene) reaction mechanism model came from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [13], which is defined as DX in this study. The n-butanol combustion reaction mechanism came from the National University of Ireland [39]. The NOx combustion reaction mechanism came from the C0-C1 NOx mechanism of the National University of Ireland [40]. These mechanisms were combined through ANSYS Workbench to eliminate duplicate reactions and redundant species. Then, a detailed mixed fuel combustion reaction kinetics mechanism was constructed to study the HCCI combustion and emission characteristics of two-stroke diesel engines. Table 2 shows the comparison of the properties of n-butanol, DX [41] and actual diesel [41]. The cetane number of DX is much higher than that of actual diesel, while the cetane number of n-butanol is lower. Therefore, the cetane number of mixed fuel can be reduced to close to the cetane number of actual diesel by mixing with n-butanol.
The actual equivalence ratio of the low-speed two-stroke diesel engine is generally 0.45 to 0.5. In this study, the equivalence ratio is 0.5. Four different initial intake pressures of 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4 atm are selected as the pressure boundary conditions of the two-stroke diesel engine HCCI combustion. Four different initial intake temperatures of 380, 400, 420, and 440 K are selected as the temperature boundary conditions for DX HCCI combustion. At a certain total mole fraction, DX and n-butanol are mixed in different proportions, and the mixing ratio of n-butanol increases gradually. Table 3 shows the mole fraction and cetane number of mixed fuel and air. Argon is used as the filling gas and does not participate in the actual reaction.

3. Results and Discussion

This article first verifies the reliability of the skeleton mechanism by comparing the ignition delay with the experiment. Then, the effects of different initial conditions and n-butanol blending ratio on two-stroke diesel engine DX HCCI combustion are researched in the study.

3.1. Ignition Delay Verification of DX-NB-NOx Skeleton Mechanism

The ignition delay data come from the simulation results of fuel in CHEMKIN closed internal combustion on engine simulator under different equivalence ratios. Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the comparison of n-dodecane ignition delay time between the mixed fuel skeleton mechanism and the experimental value [42]. It can be seen that the study selects three different equivalence ratios (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5) for comparison at 8 atm and 15 atm respectively. The simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental values in the high-temperature stage, and there are some differences in the low-temperature stage. This is because the experimental data of fuel ignition delay are obtained from the shock tube experiment, while the simulated ignition delay results come from diesel engine combustion. There are some differences in the working mode between two styles. Therefore, there is a certain difference between the diesel engine combustion simulation results and the shock tube experimental data. The overall trend of two modes is consistent, and the error is within a reasonable range. So, the reliability of the combustion simulation of n-dodecane in the newly constructed combustion reaction mechanism can be guaranteed.
Figure 4 shows the comparison of n-butanol ignition delay time between the newly constructed fuel mechanism and the experimental value [43]. It can be seen that the ignition delay times of n-butanol at three different pressures of 1.5, 3, and 42 atm are compared with the experimental values at the equivalent ratio of 1.0. The results show that the ignition delay time of n-butanol in the newly constructed mechanism was consistent with the experimental value, which ensured the reliability of the combustion simulation of n-butanol in the newly constructed combustion reaction mechanism.

3.2. Effect of Initial Pressure on DX HCCI Combustion and NO Emissions

In order to keep the combustion pressure consistent with the actual two-stroke diesel engine in the cylinder, at an equivalence ratio of 0.5 and an initial temperature of 400 K, four different pressures of 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4 atm are selected as the initial pressure of the two-stroke diesel engine HCCI combustion. Figure 5 shows the effect of different initial pressures on the in-cylinder pressure in the DX HCCI combustion. It can be seen that the peak combustion pressure increases with an increase of initial pressure. When the initial pressure is 1.4 atm, the DX HCCI combustion pressure is consistent with the experimental pressure [38]. The actual combustion pressure in the cylinder rises to the highest point after the top dead center (TDC) compared with HCCI combustion. The reason is that HCCI is an ideal combustion mode, multiple ignition points are distributed in the cylinder. When the fuel reaches ignition conditions, all the fuel is combusted at the same time in the cylinder, and the pressure rises to the highest point instantly in the cylinder. The fuel combustion reaction needs some time to progress gradually in the actual diesel engine, the fuel is completely burned after the TDC, and the cylinder pressure reaches the maximum. Therefore, the study selects 1.4 atm as the initial combustion pressure of the two-stroke engine without affecting the engine efficiency.
Figure 6 shows the effect of different initial combustion pressures on NO emissions. NO increases very slightly with the increase of initial intake pressure at a 0 crank angle degree. This is because the increase of pressure leads to an increase in the reaction rate of NO formation at the TDC, which increases the production of NO. It can be seen that the NO emission decreases slightly with the increase of initial pressure at a 50–119 crank angle degree. The reason is that the increase in combustion pressure accelerates the disturbance of the gas in the cylinder, speeds up the destruction of NO, and reduces the final production of NO. Therefore, the increase of initial combustion pressure can help to reduce NO emissions.

3.3. Effect of Initial Combustion Temperature on DX HCCI Combustion and NO Emissions

At a constant initial combustion pressure of 1.4 atm, equivalence ratio of 0.5. The study selects 380, 400, 420, and 440 K as the initial combustion temperatures for DX HCCI combustion. Figure 7 shows that when the initial temperatures are 400 K and 420 K, the combustion peak pressures in the cylinder are close to the actual combustion pressure [38]. At the same time, the fuel ignition delay time at 420 K is shorter than that at 400 K, so DX HCCI combustion can be synchronized with the actual combustion pressure curve earlier at the initial temperature of 420 K.
Figure 8 shows the effect of different initial combustion temperatures on NO emissions. It can be seen that the NO emissions at the TDC increase significantly with an increase of initial temperature, which is because the maximum in-cylinder combustion temperatures rise with the increase of the initial temperature. The final emissions of NO at the exhaust port increase slightly at different initial temperatures.
Therefore, the DX HCCI combustion will not increase significantly at the initial combustion temperature of 420 K. The simulated combustion pressure can maintain a good consistency with the actual diesel engine combustion pressure in the cylinder.

3.4. Effect of n-Butanol on DX HCCI Combustion and Emission Characteristics

3.4.1. Effect of n-Butanol Blending Ratio on the Ignition Delay Time

At a constant engine speed of 85 rpm, equivalence ratio of 0.5, the total mole fraction of the mixed fuel is fixed. Figure 9a shows the effect of n-butanol blending ratio on the ignition delay time of the high-temperature part. It can be seen that when the temperature is higher than 1100 K, the ignition delay time of the mixed fuel rises with the increase of n-butanol blending ratio. The same trend also appears in the low-temperature stage (Figure 9b). The ignition delay time increases significantly with the increase of n-butanol blending ratio when the temperature is lower than 830 K. This is because the cetane number of n-butanol is lower than that of DX (Table 2). With the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio, the cetane number of the mixed fuel decreases. As a result, the ignition delay time of the mixed fuel becomes longer. The fuel and air have more time to mix fully and uniformly before the combustion starts, which can improve the fuel combustion efficiency effectively. The cetane number of DX is higher than that of diesel, and the cetane number of n-butanol is lower than that of diesel (Table 2). Therefore, adding a certain proportion of n-butanol to DX can make the cetane number of the mixed fuel closer to real diesel. It can be seen that when the blending ratio of n-butanol is 40%, the cetane number of the mixed fuel is closest to real diesel (Table 3).

3.4.2. Effect of n-Butanol Blending Ratio on Combustion Temperature and Pressure

Figure 10 shows that the combustion temperature decreases with an increase of n-butanol percentage at a constant equivalence ratio of 0.5. This is because the lower heating value of n-butanol is lower than that of DX, the total heating value of fuel reduces with the increase of n-butanol percentage at the constant total mole fraction. The difference between the heating value of DX and n-butanol is not very large, it will not cause a significant decrease in the temperature of the main combustion process. However, the lower heating value will shorten the combustion process time. When the fuel is completely burned, the lower the heating value, the faster the combustion temperature decreases. The reduction of combustion temperature helps to reduce the production of thermal NOx. Therefore, the combustion temperature can be adjusted in an appropriate range by regulating the mixing ratios of DX and n-butanol to decrease NOx emissions
Figure 11 shows the effect of n-butanol mixing ratio on in-cylinder combustion pressure. It can be seen that the combustion pressure has not obvious change with the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio in a two-stroke diesel engine. Therefore, adding n-butanol to DX HCCI combustion will not cause a major change to the engine combustion pressure, which ensures the working efficiency of the engine.

3.4.3. Effect of n-Butanol Blending Ratio on NOx Emissions

Figure 12a shows the effect of DX and n-butanol blending ratio on NO emissions. It can be seen that NO emissions decrease significantly with the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio. When the blending ratio of n-butanol increases from 0% to 40%, the final NO emissions decreased by 21.9% (Figure 12b). Therefore, NO emissions can be reduced effectively by adding the n-butanol mixing ratio.
The same trend also appears in NO2 emissions (Figure 13a). It can be seen that the final emission of NO2 shows a downward trend with the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio. It can be clearly seen that with the blending ratio of n-butanol increases from 0% to 40%, the final NO2 emissions decrease by 7.8% from Figure 13b. Therefore, NO2 emissions can be reduced effectively by adding n-butanol in DX HCCI combustion.
NOx emissions show an obvious downward trend with the increase of n-butanol blending ratio. The main reason is that the lower heating value of DX is higher than that of n-butanol. The total heating value of fuel decreases with the increase of n-butanol blending ratio, causing the combustion temperature in the cylinder to decrease, which leads to a decrease in NOx emissions. At the same time, the increase of n-butanol blending ratio leads to a lower cetane number of the mixed fuel and increases the ignition delay time. The fuel has sufficient time for uniform mixing and shortens the combustion process. Since long-time combustion is also an important factor that causes the increase of NOx emissions. Therefore, the NOx emissions can be reduced by shortening the combustion process.

3.4.4. Effect of n-Butanol Blending Ratio on NOx Reaction Rate

Figure 14 shows the effect of n-butanol blending ratio on the chemical reaction rate of NO produced at the maximum combustion temperature in the cylinder. The main reaction paths of NO generation at the in-cylinder combustion peak temperature are indicated by the following chemical equations:
HNO + N2 ⟷ NO + NNH
NO2 ⟷ NO + O
NO2 + OH ⟷ NO + HO2
N2 + O ⟷ NO + N
It can be seen that the reaction rate of NO decreases significantly with the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio. The maximum reduction of NO production rate can reach about 48.8%. The main reason is that the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio leads to a decrease in the total heating value of the mixed fuel, which reduces the in-cylinder combustion temperature. The lower combustion temperature suppresses the perturbation of the gas in the cylinder. Therefore, the production rate and emissions of NO are reduced effectively.
Figure 15 shows the effect of n-butanol blending ratio on the chemical reaction rate of NO2 produced at the maximum combustion temperature in the cylinder. The main reaction paths of NO2 generation at the in-cylinder combustion peak temperature are indicated by the following chemical equations:
HONO + OH ⟷ NO2 + H2O
NO + OH ⟷ NO2 + H
It’s the same as the decrease of NO reaction rate, the total heating value of the mixed fuel decreases with the increase of n-butanol blending ratio, which reduces the combustion temperature in the cylinder. The lower combustion temperature suppresses the perturbation of the gas in the cylinder, the combustion reaction rate of NO2 decreases, which leads to a reduction in NO2 emissions. The NO2 generation rate can be reduced by about 46.4% at most.
It can be seen that the combustion reaction rate and emissions of NOx reduces significantly with the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio. When the blending ratio of n-butanol reaches 40%, the production rate of NO and NO2 can be reduced by more than 40%. Therefore, NOx emissions can be reduced effectively by increasing n-butanol mixing ratio in a suitable range.

3.4.5. Effect of n-Butanol Blending Ratio on CO2 Emissions

Figure 16 shows the effect of DX and n-butanol mixing ratio on CO2 emissions at an equivalence ratio of 0.5. It can be seen that the CO2 emissions decrease significantly with the increase of n-butanol blending ratio. The reason for the decrease in CO2 production is that the C/H ratio of n-butanol is lower than that of DX. The C/H ratio of the mixed fuel decreases with the increase of n-butanol. Therefore, it can be known that CO2 emissions in two-stroke diesel engine HCCI combustion reduce significantly with an increase of n-butanol mixing ratio.
Figure 17 shows the effect of n-butanol blending ratio on the C/H mass ratio and the final CO2 emissions of the mixed fuel. It can be clearly seen that the C/H mass ratio of the mixed fuel decreases significantly with the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio. The decrease of the C/H mass ratio leads to the reduction of the final CO2 emissions. The final CO2 emission decreases by about 23.9% when the blending ratio of n-butanol reaches 40%. Therefore, C/H mass ratio and CO2 emissions of the two-stroke diesel engine HCCI combustion can be reduced effectively by increasing the n-butanol mixing ratio in a suitable range.

4. Conclusions

A mixture of n-dodecane and m-xylene was used as an alternative fuel for diesel. The complete combustion reaction mechanism of diesel (DX), n-butanol and NOx was established for two-stroke diesel engine HCCI combustion. Through the sensitivity analysis, ignition delay time, combustion temperature, in-cylinder pressure, NOx and CO2 emissions were obtained for different n-butanol mixture ratios during the diesel alternative fuel DX HCCI combustion. Through the analysis of reaction paths, the main formation path and chemical reaction rate of NOx were observed accurately. The main findings from this research are as follows:
The peak combustion pressure increased with an increase of initial intake pressure from 0.8 to 1.4 atm on low-speed two-stroke diesel engines HCCI combustion. The combustion pressure of the model used at 1.4 atm in the cylinder was consistent with the actual combustion pressure. The final NO emissions decreased slightly with the increase of initial intake pressure.
The ignition time advances with the increase of initial intake temperature from 380 to 440 K. The combustion pressure of the model used at initial temperature of 420 K was consistent with the actual combustion pressure. The final NO emissions increased slightly with the increase of initial intake temperature.
Different DX and n-butanol mixing ratios were used at a constant total mole fraction. The ignition delay time increased with an increase of n-butanol ratio. The combustion temperature decreased rapidly with the increase of the n-butanol blending ratio after the TDC. The reaction rate and emissions of NOx reduced significantly with the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio. When the blending ratio of n-butanol reaches 40%, the production rate of NO and NO2 could be reduced by more than 40%. The NOx reaction rates decreased rapidly with the increase of n-butanol mixing ratio at the TDC. At the same time, C/H mass ratio and the CO2 emissions decreased significantly with the increase of n-butanol percentage. Therefore, the combustion and emission of DX HCCI combustion can be improved by increasing the n-butanol mixing ratio at the same engine load.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, S.W.; project administration, J.Z.; writing—review and editing, L.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Research on Intelligent Ship Testing and Verification ([2018]473). The Major Research plan of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91441132).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the first author.

Acknowledgments

All authors are very grateful to the editors and anonymous reviewers for their great contributions on the manuscript reviewing and constructive comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

HCCIhomogeneous charge compression ignition
DXn-dodecane and m-xylene
NBn-butanol
rpmrevolutions per minute
Arargon
TDCtop dead center

References

  1. Demirbas, A. Importance of biodiesel as transportation fuel. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 4661–4670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pienkos, P.T.; Darzins, A. The promise and challenges of microalgal-derived biofuels. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2009, 3, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blasio, G.D.; Ianniello, R.; Beatrice, C. Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil as Enabler for High-Efficient and Ultra-Low Emission Vehicles in the View of 2030 Targets. Fuel 2022, 310, 122206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cho, C.P.; Pyo, Y.D.; Jang, J.Y.; Kim, G.C.; Shin, Y.J. NOx Reduction and N2O Emissions in A Diesel Engine Exhaust Using Fe–Zeolite and Vanadium based SCR Catalysts. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 110, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Geng, P.; Tan, Q.; Zhang, C.; Wei, L.; He, X.; Cao, E.; Jiang, K. Experimental investigation on NOx and green house gas emissions from a marine auxiliary diesel engine using ultralow sulfur light fuel. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 572, 467–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jeon, J.; Lee, J.T.; Park, S. Nitrogen Compounds (NO, NO2, N2O, and NH3) in NOx Emissions from Commercial EURO VI Type Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines with a Urea-Selective Catalytic Reduction System. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 6828–6834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. European Parliament of 4 February 2009 on 2050: The Future Begins Today-Recommendations for the EU’s Future Integrated Policy on Climate Change. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0042_EN.html (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  8. Kong, S.-C.; Sun, Y.; Rietz, R.D. Modeling Diesel Spray Flame Liftoff, Sooting Tendency, and NOx Emissions Using Detailed Chemistry with Phenomenological Soot Model. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2005, 129, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Senecal, P.K.; Richards, K.J.; Pomraning, E.; Yang, T.; Dai, M.Z.; McDavid, R.M.; Patterson, M.A.; Hou, S.; Shethaji, T. A New Parallel Cut-Cell Cartesian CFD Code for Rapid Grid Generation Applied to In-Cylinder Diesel Engine Simulations. In Proceedings of the SAE World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, USA, 16–19 April 2007. [Google Scholar]
  10. Som, S.; Aggarwal, S.K. Effects of Primary Breakup Modeling on Spray and Combustion Characteristics of Compression Ignition Engines. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 1179–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pitz, W.J.; Cernansky, N.P.; Dryer, F.L.; Egolfopoulos, F.N.; Farrell, J.T.; Friend, D.G.; Pitsch, H. Development of an Experimental Database and Kinetic Models for Surrogate Diesel Fuels. In Proceedings of the SAE World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, MI, USA, 16–19 April 2007. [Google Scholar]
  12. Luo, Z.; Som, S.K.; Sarathy, S.M.; Plomer, M.; Pitz, W.J.; Longman, D.E.; Lu, T. Development and validation of an n-dodecane skeletal mechanism for spray combustion applications. Combust. Theory Model. 2014, 18, 187–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pei, Y.; Mehl, M.; Liu, W.; Lu, T.; Pitz, W.J.; Som, S. A Multi-Component Blend as A Diesel Fuel Surrogate for Compression Ignition Engine Applications. In Proceedings of the ASME 2014 Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference, ICEF2014-5625, Columbus, IN, USA, 19 October 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. Bowman, C.T.; Golden, D.M.; Hanson, R.K.; Pitsch, H.; Wang, L. Optimization of Synthetic Oxygenated Fuels for Diesel Engines; GCEP Technical Report; Global Climate and Energy Project (GCEP) at Stanford University: Stanford, CA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ren, Y.; Huang, Z.; Miao, H.; Di, Y.; Jiang, D.; Zeng, K.; Liu, B.; Wang, X. Combustion and emissions of a DI diesel engine fuelled with diesel-oxygenate blends. Fuel 2008, 87, 2691–2697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cheng, A.S.; Dibble, R.W.; Buchholz, B.A. The Effect of Oxygenates on Diesel Engine Particulate Matter. SAE Pap. 2002, 1, 1705. [Google Scholar]
  17. Flower, W.L. An investigation of Soot Formation in Axisymmetric Turbulent Diffusion Flames at Elevated Pressure. Symp. Combust. 1989, 22, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zannis, T.; Hountalas, D.T.; Kouremenos, D.A. Experimental Investigation to Specify the Effect of Oxygenated Addition Content and Type on DI Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions. SAE Trans. 2004, 113, 166–179. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yeh, L.I.; Rickeard, D.J.; Duff, J.L.C.; Bateman, J.R.; Schlosberg, R.H.; Caers, R.F. Oxygenates: An Evaluation of their Effects on Diesel Emissions. SAE Trans. 2001, 110, 1482–1498. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yao, M.; Wang, H.; Zheng, Z.; Yue, Y. Experimental study of n-butanol additive and multi-injection on HD diesel engine performance and emissions. Fuel 2010, 89, 2191–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rakopoulos, C.D.; Dimaratos, A.M.; Giakoumis, E.G. Study of Turbocharged Diesel Engine Operation, Pollutant Emissions and Combustion Noise Radiation During Starting with Bio-diesel or N-butanol Diesel Fuel Blends. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 3905–3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Siwale, L.; Kristóf, L.; Adam, T.; Bereczky, A.; Mbarawa, M.; Penninger, A.; Kolesnikov, A. Combustion and Emission Characteristics of n-Butanol/Diesel Fuel Blend in A Turbo-Charged Compression Ignition Engine. Fuel 2013, 107, 409–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, G.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yao, M.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, H. Experimental study on combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine fueled with 2,5-dimethylfuran–diesel, n-butanol–diesel and gasoline–diesel blends. Energy 2013, 54, 333–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jin, C.; Yao, M.; Liu, H.; Lee, C.-F.F.; Ji, J. Progress in the production and application of n-butanol as a biofuel. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 4080–4106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Doğan, O. The Influence of n-Butanol/Diesel Fuel Blends Utilization on A Small Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions. Fuel 2011, 90, 2467–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kumar, P.; Rehman, A. Bio-diesel in homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) combustion. Renew Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 536–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, J.; Lü, X.; Ji, L.; Huang, Z. An experimental study of HCCI-DI combustion and emissions in a diesel engine with dual fuel. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2008, 47, 1235–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dempsey, A.B.; Curran, S.J.; Wagner, R.M. A Perspective on the Range of Gasoline Compression Ignition Combustion Strategies for High Engine Efficiency and Low NOx and Soot Emissions: Effects of In-Cylinder Fuel Stratification. Int. J. Engine. Res. 2016, 17, 897–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yao, M.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, H. Progress and recent trends in homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engines. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2009, 35, 398–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lu, X.C.; Han, D.; Huang, Z. Fuel Design and Management for the Control of Advanced Compression-ignition Combustion Modes. Prog. Energ. Combust. 2011, 37, 741–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Olsson, J.-O.; Tunestål, P.; Johansson, B. Closed-Loop Control of an HCCI Engine. SAE Trans. 2001, 110, 1076–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, S.Y.; Yao, L. Effect of Engine Speeds and Dimethyl Ether on Methyl Decanoate HCCI Combustion and Emission Characteristics Based on Low-Speed Two-Stroke Diesel Engine. Pol. Marit. Res. 2020, 27, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jothi, N.M.; Nagarajan, G.; Renganarayanan, S. Experimental studies on homogeneous charge CI engine fueled with LPG using DEE as an ignition enhancer. Renew. Energy 2007, 32, 1581–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Szybist, J.P.; McFarlane, J.; Bunting, B.G. Comparison of Simulated and Experimental Combustion of Biodiesel Blends in a Single Cylinder Diesel HCCI Engine. SAE Trans. 2007, 116, 1250–1260. [Google Scholar]
  35. He, B.-Q.; Yuan, J.; Liu, M.-B.; Zhao, H. Combustion and emission characteristics of a n-butanol HCCI engine. Fuel 2014, 115, 758–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Maurya, R.K.; Agarwal, A.K. Combustion and Emission Characterization of n-Butanol Fueled HCCI Engine. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2014, 137, 011101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zheng, M.; Han, X.; Asad, U.; Wang, J. Investigation of butanol-fuelled HCCI combustion on a high efficiency diesel engine. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 98, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Radica, G.; Antonić, R.; Račić, N. Engine Working Cycle Analysis for Diagnostic and Optimisation Purposes. Brodogradnja 2009, 60, 378–387. [Google Scholar]
  39. Black, G.; Curran, H.; Pichon, S.; Simmie, J.; Zhukov, V. Bio-butanol: Combustion properties and detailed chemical kinetic model. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Y.; Mathieu, O.; Petersen, E.L.; Bourque, G.; Curran, H.J. Assessing the Predictions of A NOx Kinetic Mechanism on Recent Hydrogen and Syngas Experimental Data. Combust. Flame 2017, 182, 122–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kook, S.; Pickett, L.M. Liquid length and vapor penetration of conventional, Fischer–Tropsch, coal-derived, and surrogate fuel sprays at high-temperature and high-pressure ambient conditions. Fuel 2012, 93, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mao, Y.; Raza, M.; Wu, Z.; Zhu, J.; Yu, L.; Wang, S.; Zhu, L.; Lu, X. An experimental study of n-dodecane and the development of an improved kinetic model. Combust. Flame 2020, 212, 388–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Stranic, I.; Chase, D.P.; Harmon, J.T.; Yang, S.; Davidson, D.F.; Hanson, R.K. Shock Tube Measurements of Ignition Delay Times for the Butanol Isomers. Combust. Flame 2012, 159, 516–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Atmosphere 13 00303 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 0.5, 8 atm; (b) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 0.5, 15 atm.
Figure 1. (a) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 0.5, 8 atm; (b) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 0.5, 15 atm.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g001
Atmosphere 13 00303 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 1.0, 8 atm; (b) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 1.0, 15 atm.
Figure 2. (a) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 1.0, 8 atm; (b) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 1.0, 15 atm.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g002
Atmosphere 13 00303 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 1.5, 8 atm; (b) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 1.5, 15 atm.
Figure 3. (a) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 1.5, 8 atm; (b) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-dodecane at Ф = 1.5, 15 atm.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g003
Atmosphere 13 00303 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-butanol at Ф = 1.0, 1.5 atm; (b) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-butanol at Ф = 1.0, 3 atm; (c) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-butanol at Ф = 1.0, 42 atm.
Figure 4. (a) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-butanol at Ф = 1.0, 1.5 atm; (b) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-butanol at Ф = 1.0, 3 atm; (c) Comparison of simulated and experimental ignition delay time of n-butanol at Ф = 1.0, 42 atm.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g004
Atmosphere 13 00303 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparison of different initial pressures and experimental pressure.
Figure 5. Comparison of different initial pressures and experimental pressure.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g005
Atmosphere 13 00303 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of initial combustion pressures on NO emissions.
Figure 6. Effect of initial combustion pressures on NO emissions.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g006
Atmosphere 13 00303 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of initial combustion temperatures on in-cylinder pressure.
Figure 7. Effect of initial combustion temperatures on in-cylinder pressure.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g007
Atmosphere 13 00303 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of initial combustion temperatures on NO emissions.
Figure 8. Effect of initial combustion temperatures on NO emissions.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g008
Atmosphere 13 00303 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Effect of DX and n-butanol blending ratio on high-temperature ignition delay; (b) Effect of DX and n-butanol blending ratio on low-temperature ignition delay.
Figure 9. (a) Effect of DX and n-butanol blending ratio on high-temperature ignition delay; (b) Effect of DX and n-butanol blending ratio on low-temperature ignition delay.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g009
Atmosphere 13 00303 g010 550
Figure 10. Effect of DX and n-butanol mixing ratio on combustion temperature in cylinder.
Figure 10. Effect of DX and n-butanol mixing ratio on combustion temperature in cylinder.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g010
Atmosphere 13 00303 g011 550
Figure 11. Effect of DX and n-butanol mixing ratio on combustion pressure in cylinder.
Figure 11. Effect of DX and n-butanol mixing ratio on combustion pressure in cylinder.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g011
Atmosphere 13 00303 g012 550
Figure 12. (a) Effect of DX and n-butanol blending ratio on NO emissions; (b) Effect of n-butanol percentage on final NO emissions.
Figure 12. (a) Effect of DX and n-butanol blending ratio on NO emissions; (b) Effect of n-butanol percentage on final NO emissions.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g012
Atmosphere 13 00303 g013 550
Figure 13. (a) Effect of DX and n-butanol mixing ratio blending ratio on NO2 emissions; (b) Effect of n-butanol percentage on final NO2 emissions.
Figure 13. (a) Effect of DX and n-butanol mixing ratio blending ratio on NO2 emissions; (b) Effect of n-butanol percentage on final NO2 emissions.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g013
Atmosphere 13 00303 g014 550
Figure 14. Effect of n-butanol mixing ratio on NO formation rate.
Figure 14. Effect of n-butanol mixing ratio on NO formation rate.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g014
Atmosphere 13 00303 g015 550
Figure 15. Effect of n-butanol mixing ratio on NO2 formation rate.
Figure 15. Effect of n-butanol mixing ratio on NO2 formation rate.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g015
Atmosphere 13 00303 g016 550
Figure 16. Effect of DX and n-butanol blending ratio on CO2 emissions.
Figure 16. Effect of DX and n-butanol blending ratio on CO2 emissions.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g016
Atmosphere 13 00303 g017 550
Figure 17. Effect of n-butanol percentage on C-H mass ratio and final CO2 emissions.
Figure 17. Effect of n-butanol percentage on C-H mass ratio and final CO2 emissions.
Atmosphere 13 00303 g017
Table
Table 1. Test engine parameters and specifications.
Table 1. Test engine parameters and specifications.
ItemData
Engine speed85 rpm
Effective power13,364 kW
Mean effective pressure15.27 bar
Stroke3674 mm
Number of cylinders6
Connecting rod length3066 mm
Cylinder diameter700 mm
Table
Table 2. Properties of fuels.
Table 2. Properties of fuels.
PropertyDieselDXn-Butanol
C/H mass ratio6.535.964.80
Lower heating value (MJ/kg)42.9843.3335.10
Oxygen content (weight %)0021.6
Cetane number467012
Table
Table 3. Species composition ratio and cetane number of DX-NB mixtures.
Table 3. Species composition ratio and cetane number of DX-NB mixtures.
Mole Fraction of DXMole Fraction of NBMole Fraction of O2Mole Fraction of N2Mole Fraction of
Ar		Cetane Number
1.0033.32125.35070.0
0.90.131.19117.3310.1564.2
0.80.229.06109.3220.2958.4
0.70.326.92101.2730.4852.6
0.60.424.7993.2640.6246.8
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Yao, L. Effect of Combustion Boundary Conditions and n-Butanol on Surrogate Diesel Fuel HCCI Combustion and Emission Based on Two-Stroke Diesel Engine. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020303

AMA Style

Wang S, Zhang J, Yao L. Effect of Combustion Boundary Conditions and n-Butanol on Surrogate Diesel Fuel HCCI Combustion and Emission Based on Two-Stroke Diesel Engine. Atmosphere. 2022; 13(2):303. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Shiye, Jundong Zhang, and Li Yao. 2022. "Effect of Combustion Boundary Conditions and n-Butanol on Surrogate Diesel Fuel HCCI Combustion and Emission Based on Two-Stroke Diesel Engine" Atmosphere 13, no. 2: 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020303

APA Style

Wang, S., Zhang, J., & Yao, L. (2022). Effect of Combustion Boundary Conditions and n-Butanol on Surrogate Diesel Fuel HCCI Combustion and Emission Based on Two-Stroke Diesel Engine. Atmosphere, 13(2), 303. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13020303

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop