Next Article in Journal
Characteristics of Extratropical Cyclones That Cause Tornadoes in Italy: A Preliminary Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Road Emissions in London: Insights from Geographically Detailed Classification and Regression Modelling
Previous Article in Journal
Air Pollution Modeling: Local, Regional, and Global-Scale Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mobile Monitoring for the Spatial and Temporal Assessment of Local Air Quality (NO2) in the City of London
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Understanding Spatial Variability of NO2 in Urban Areas Using Spatial Modelling and Data Fusion Approaches

1
Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
2
Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2021, 12(2), 179; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020179
Submission received: 3 January 2021 / Revised: 23 January 2021 / Accepted: 25 January 2021 / Published: 29 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Quality in the UK)

Abstract

Small-scale spatial variability in NO2 concentrations is analysed with the help of pollution maps. Maps of NO2 estimated by the Airviro dispersion model and land use regression (LUR) model are fused with measured NO2 concentrations from low-cost sensors (LCS), reference sensors and diffusion tubes. In this study, geostatistical universal kriging was employed for fusing (integrating) model estimations with measured NO2 concentrations. The results showed that the data fusion approach was capable of estimating realistic NO2 concentration maps that inherited spatial patterns of the pollutant from the model estimations and adjusted the modelled values using the measured concentrations. Maps produced by the fusion of NO2-LCS with NO2-LUR produced better results, with r-value 0.96 and RMSE 9.09. Data fusion adds value to both measured and estimated concentrations: the measured data are improved by predicting spatiotemporal gaps, whereas the modelled data are improved by constraining them with observed data. Hotspots of NO2 were shown in the city centre, eastern parts of the city towards the motorway (M1) and on some major roads. Air quality standards were exceeded at several locations in Sheffield, where annual mean NO2 levels were higher than 40 µg/m3. Road traffic was considered to be the dominant emission source of NO2 in Sheffield.
Keywords: nitrogen dioxide; spatial variability; urban air quality; data fusion; dispersion modelling; land use regression; Sheffield nitrogen dioxide; spatial variability; urban air quality; data fusion; dispersion modelling; land use regression; Sheffield

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Munir, S.; Mayfield, M.; Coca, D. Understanding Spatial Variability of NO2 in Urban Areas Using Spatial Modelling and Data Fusion Approaches. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020179

AMA Style

Munir S, Mayfield M, Coca D. Understanding Spatial Variability of NO2 in Urban Areas Using Spatial Modelling and Data Fusion Approaches. Atmosphere. 2021; 12(2):179. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020179

Chicago/Turabian Style

Munir, Said, Martin Mayfield, and Daniel Coca. 2021. "Understanding Spatial Variability of NO2 in Urban Areas Using Spatial Modelling and Data Fusion Approaches" Atmosphere 12, no. 2: 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020179

APA Style

Munir, S., Mayfield, M., & Coca, D. (2021). Understanding Spatial Variability of NO2 in Urban Areas Using Spatial Modelling and Data Fusion Approaches. Atmosphere, 12(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020179

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop