Next Article in Journal
Comparing BeadChip and WGS Genotyping: Non-Technical Failed Calling Is Attributable to Additional Variation within the Probe Target Sequence
Next Article in Special Issue
iPBS-Retrotransposon Markers in the Analysis of Genetic Diversity among Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Germplasm from Türkiye
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Haplotype of MYF5 Gene Are Associated with Body Measurements and Ultrasound Traits in Grassland Short-Tailed Sheep
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Population Structure of a Worldwide Collection of Tropical Japonica Rice Indicates Limited Geographic Differentiation and Shows Promising Genetic Variability Associated with New Plant Type

by Vikram Jeet Singh 1, Prolay Kumar Bhowmick 1,*, Kunnummal Kurungara Vinod 1, Subbaiyan Gopala Krishnan 1, Shekharappa Nandakumar 1, Amit Kumar 2, Manoj Kumar 1, Sonu Shekhawat 1, Brijesh Kumar Dixit 1, Ankit Malik 1, Ranjith Kumar Ellur 1, Haritha Bollinedi 1, Mariappan Nagarajan 3 and Ashok Kumar Singh 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 23 February 2022 / Revised: 7 March 2022 / Accepted: 8 March 2022 / Published: 9 March 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript entitled " Population Structure of a Worldwide Collection of Tropical Japonica Rice Indicates Limited Geographic Differentiation and
Shows Promising Genetic Variability Associated with New Plant Type" characterized a set of tropical japonica rice lines to identify phenotypic and genotypic diversity and population structure by using SSR markers and agro-morphological traits. The study is very meaningful for identifying potential parental sources for future hybrid rice breeding. The data were well analyzed and displayed.  I suggest to accept the manuscript just after minor revising on English language.

Author Response

Response 1.

We thank the reviewer for his/her encouraging comment. We have rechecked the entire manuscript for readability, language and accuracy of data presents. We have made appropriate corrections as required. We are confident that the manuscript has improved significantly based on the reviewers suggestions.

Reviewer 2 Report

Generally, the research was well performed and written in a clear presentation. However, there are some minor things the authors need to perfect before accepted:

  1. Figure 2 and 3 there are too many dots, the authors need to pick some dots and make it clearer.
  2. Table 5 the authors mentioned simulation, however, there is no simulation procedure described.

Author Response

Comment 1. Figure 2 and 3 there are too many dots, the authors need to pick some dots and make it clearer.

Response: The figures 2 and 3 are modified by reducing the dot size.

Comment 2. Table 5 the authors mentioned simulation, however, there is no simulation procedure described.

Response: The Bayesian process in the population structure analysis simulates the population statistics based on the k range selected while running the MCMC simulations. The table 5 provided the abstract of the simulation summary.

Back to TopTop