Next Article in Journal
New Insights into Long Terminal Repeat Retrotransposons in Mulberry Species
Next Article in Special Issue
The Response to DNA Damage at Telomeric Repeats and Its Consequences for Telomere Function
Previous Article in Journal
How Often Do Protein Genes Navigate Valleys of Low Fitness?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structure-Specific Endonucleases and the Resolution of Chromosome Underreplication
Article

Microhomology Selection for Microhomology Mediated End Joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1
Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Biotechnology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA
2
Genomic Instability Research Center, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164, World Cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Korea
3
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2019, 10(4), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10040284
Received: 4 March 2019 / Revised: 26 March 2019 / Accepted: 28 March 2019 / Published: 8 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chromosome Replication and Genome Integrity)
Microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) anneals short, imperfect microhomologies flanking DNA breaks, producing repair products with deletions in a Ku- and RAD52-independent fashion. Puzzlingly, MMEJ preferentially selects certain microhomologies over others, even when multiple microhomologies are available. To define rules and parameters for microhomology selection, we altered the length, the position, and the level of mismatches to the microhomologies flanking homothallic switching (HO) endonuclease-induced breaks and assessed their effect on MMEJ frequency and the types of repair product formation. We found that microhomology of eight to 20 base pairs carrying no more than 20% mismatches efficiently induced MMEJ. Deletion of MSH6 did not impact MMEJ frequency. MMEJ preferentially chose a microhomology pair that was more proximal from the break. Interestingly, MMEJ events preferentially retained the centromere proximal side of the HO break, while the sequences proximal to the telomere were frequently deleted. The asymmetry in the deletional profile among MMEJ products was reduced when HO was induced on the circular chromosome. The results provide insight into how cells search and select microhomologies for MMEJ in budding yeast. View Full-Text
Keywords: microhomology; microhomology-mediated end joining; DNA double strand break; mismatch; deletion microhomology; microhomology-mediated end joining; DNA double strand break; mismatch; deletion
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, K.; Ji, J.-H.; Yoon, K.; Che, J.; Seol, J.-H.; Lee, S.E.; Shim, E.Y. Microhomology Selection for Microhomology Mediated End Joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes 2019, 10, 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10040284

AMA Style

Lee K, Ji J-H, Yoon K, Che J, Seol J-H, Lee SE, Shim EY. Microhomology Selection for Microhomology Mediated End Joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes. 2019; 10(4):284. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10040284

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Kihoon; Ji, Jae-Hoon; Yoon, Kihoon; Che, Jun; Seol, Ja-Hwan; Lee, Sang E.; Shim, Eun Y. 2019. "Microhomology Selection for Microhomology Mediated End Joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae" Genes 10, no. 4: 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10040284

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop