Next Article in Journal
The Nuclear Transporter Transportin-3 Functions Under Oxidative Stress
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring Autologous Dendritic Cells for T Cell Modulation: A Step Towards Personalized Medicine in Leishmaniasis
Previous Article in Journal
Serum Extracellular Vesicle Protein Signatures Associated with Early-Stage High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Glucose Metabolism and Innate Immune Responses in Influenza Virus Infection: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Perspectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expression of Human CEACAM Receptors Promotes Inflammation and Organ Damage During Systemic Candida albicans Infection in Mice

1
Center for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
2
Host Septomics Group, Centre for Innovation Competence (ZIK) Septomics, Jena University Hospital, 07745 Jena, Germany
3
Functional Proteomics, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
4
Microbial Pathogenicity Mechanisms, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology-Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), 07745 Jena, Germany
5
Dynamic42 GmbH, 07745 Jena, Germany
6
Respiratory Infection Dynamics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research-HZI Braunschweig, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
7
German Center for Lung Research (DZL), BREATH, 30625 Hannover, Germany
8
Veterinary Centre for Resistance Research (TZR), Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
9
Institut Für Tierpathologie, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany
10
Department of Applied Systems Biology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology-Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), 07745 Jena, Germany
11
Faculty of Biological Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
12
Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany
13
Department of Pneumology, Lungenklinik Heckeshorn, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, 14165 Berlin, Germany
14
Department of Pneumology and Infectiology, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, 10249 Berlin, Germany
15
Institut Für Rechtsmedizin, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
16
Department of Microbial Immunology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology-Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), 07745 Jena, Germany
17
Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2026, 15(8), 707; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15080707
Submission received: 23 February 2026 / Revised: 4 April 2026 / Accepted: 10 April 2026 / Published: 16 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Host–Pathogen Interactions and Immune Responses)

Highlights

What are the main findings?
  • In a murine C. albicans infection model, transgenic CEABAC10 mice expressing human CEACAM family receptors exhibited heightened systemic inflammation and reduced survival.
  • In vivo and in vitro analyses indicated that expression of human CEACAM6 on monocytes in CEABAC10 mice led to elevated cytokine production and enhanced neutrophil recruitment, resulting in exacerbated inflammation and decreased survival.
What are the implications of the main findings?
  • This study provides the first evidence that expression of human CEACAM6 on monocytes and macrophages in transgenic CEABAC10 mice plays a critical role in regulating host immune responses to (fungal) pathogens.
  • During C. albicans infection, the expression of human CEACAM3 and CEACAM6 on murine neutrophils did not directly influence neutrophil responses.

Abstract

Invasive candidiasis is a fungal infection characterized by a high mortality rate. Carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM) family receptors play a crucial role in regulating innate responses of both leukocytes and epithelia. Human CEACAM3, CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 receptors recognize Candida albicans and are expressed in transgenic CEABAC10 mice. In a murine C. albicans infection model, CEABAC10 mice exhibited a shortened survival period attributed to an early cytokine storm, an exacerbated acute phase response, and heightened systemic inflammation compared to their wild-type littermates. The livers and kidneys of CEABAC10 mice displayed intensified purulent necrotizing inflammation, accompanied by increased infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages. Our in vivo and in vitro data indicated that the expression of CEACAM6 on monocytes of CEABAC10 mice caused the elevated cytokine levels and the subsequent exacerbation of the acute phase response upon C. albicans infection, resulting in decreased survival.

1. Introduction

The fungal pathogen Candida albicans (C. albicans) is a predominant cause of human Candida bloodstream infections, associated with elevated mortality rates [1,2]. The incidence of systemic candidiasis is on the rise, particularly among patients with high-risk factors such as prior antibiotic exposure, chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, prolonged intensive care requirements due to other medical conditions, and the use of central venous catheters [3].
Host defense against systemic candidiasis relies on the crucial role of myeloid phagocytes, including neutrophils, inflammatory monocytes, and tissue-resident macrophages [2]. The initial phase of their interaction with the fungus involves the fundamental step of fungal recognition, which mounts the inflammatory response against the invading fungus, orchestrates pathogen uptake and systemic inflammatory responses during blood stream infections.
In addition to pattern recognition receptors [4,5], C. albicans is recognized by members of the human CEACAM receptor family, namely, CEACAM1, CEACAM3, CEACAM5, and CEACAM6 [6]. CEACAM1 and CEACAM3 are modulatory receptors that signal via their intracellular immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM), respectively. CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 are GPI-anchored and organized in membrane microdomains [7,8]. The well-described immunoregulatory function of CEACAM1 is complemented by the impact of CEACAM3, CEACAM5, and CEACAM6 on immune reactions across a diverse array of cell types [9,10,11,12,13]. In vitro data indicate immunoregulatory roles for human CEACAM1 and CEACAM6 in the innate immune response of human intestinal epithelial cells and human neutrophils triggered by C. albicans stimulation [6,14]. However, the expression of human CEACAM1 in transgenic mice had no discernible effect on their susceptibility to systemic candidiasis or on C. albicans colonization/dissemination [15].
Similar to its human homolog, mouse CEACAM1 serves as a receptor for host-specific pathogens, such as the murine hepatitis virus (MHV) [16], and possesses regulatory functions in immune responses across diverse cell types, both in vivo and in vitro [17,18]. However, mouse CEACAM1 does not bind to C. albicans cell surface structures [6]. Notably, mice lack the homologous genes for CEACAM3, CEACAM5, and CEACAM6 receptors [19].
Chan and Stanners developed CEABAC10 mice transgenic for human CEACAM3, CEACAM5, CEACAM6, and CEACAM7, including the human promotor region [20]. The extensive epithelial expression of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 on the surface of various mucosal tissues in CEABAC10 mice, including the intestinal tract, closely mirrors their expression in humans [20]. While CEACAM5 is specifically expressed on apical membranes of epithelial cells, CEACAM6 is also present on immune cells, including neutrophils, alongside the neutrophil-specific CEACAM3 [20]. Notably, CEACAM7 does not bind to C. albicans and is selectively expressed in a limited number of highly differentiated epithelial cells in the colon [6,20]. The CEABAC10 mouse model is widely employed for analyzing CEACAM receptor functions in the host’s response to infections with human pathogens. It provided crucial insight into the role of CEACAM6 in conjunction with adhering-invasive E. coli (AIEC) in Crohn’s disease pathology in vivo [21,22], and it has contributed valuable information regarding the involvement of CEACAM receptors in the neutrophil response to Neisseria gonorrhea in vitro [23]. To date, to our knowledge, only local bacterial infections, no systemic infections, have been studied in CEABAC10 mice.
While many studies underline the importance of CEACAM5 and CEACAM6 in malignancies [24] and increasing evidence is available for bacterial infections [25], their interaction with C. albicans has been studied so far only in vitro [6,14]. Also, CEACAM6 on mononuclear phagocytes has been poorly analyzed until now. Early publications indicated the expression of CEACAM6 on human monocytic cells and tissue macrophages [26,27,28], but these studies were conducted with antibodies recognizing several human CEACAM receptors, including CEACAM1. No studies on mononuclear phagocytes derived from CEABAC10 mice have been conducted until now. In the present study, we used the CEABAC10 mouse model to investigate the impact of CEACAM3, CEACAM5, and CEACAM6 on disseminated candidiasis in vivo [15,24,29]. The presence of CEACAMs led to severe infection pathology, a heightened IL-6-mediated acute phase response, and early death in candidemic CEABAC10 mice. Through in vitro experiments employing primary bone marrow-derived myeloid cells, we found that CEACAM3 expression did not affect inflammatory responses, and we identified CEACAM6+ classical monocytes and resident macrophages as the cell populations responsible for the hyperinflammatory response to systemic C. albicans infection in CEABAC10 mice. These findings suggest that CEACAM6 may play a previously unknown role in the inflammatory response of mononuclear phagocytes during systemic candidiasis.

2. Materials and Methods

C. albicans strain and culture: C. albicans Berkhout strain SC5314 was used for all experiments and was grown as described [15]. In some cases, germ tubes were induced as described [15]. For FITC labelling, 10 × 107 yeast cells were suspended in 10 mL carbonate buffer (pH 9.5; 70% sodium bicarbonate, 30% sodium carbonate) and 100 µL of a FITC stock solution (10 mg/mL in PBS) and incubated for one hour at 23 °C, 150 rpm, in the dark. Labeled yeast cells were washed twice with PBS.
Mouse strains: FVB mice transgenic for the human CEACAM3, -5, -6, and -7 genes, CEABAC10 [20], were crossed into the C57BL/6NRj background using Speed Congenics. The status of the background was supervised by GVG Genetic Monitoring (Leipzig, Germany). Mice were bred heterozygous, and a minimum of 12 backcrosses were performed prior to the first experiment. The genotypes (CEABAC10+/− or wild type) were determined by PCR analysis of tail biopsies using the following primer pairs for the transgenic human CEACAMs (5′–3′): CEACAM3 (AACCCCAGGACAGCAGCTTC and GAGAGGCCTTTGTCCTGACC), CEACAM5 (CATTTGCAACAGCTACAGTC and AGTGCAGTGGTATCAGAAAC), CEACAM6 (TACTCAGCGTCAAAAGGAAC and AGAGACGTGGATCATCATCGTGA), and CEACAM7 (TGATCCTCCTGATTGTCACA CTACTGGGCAATACAACAGT). Mouse interferon beta primers ATAAGCAGCTCCAGCTCCAA and GCAACCACCACTCATTCTGA were used as a positive control. Wild-type littermates were co-housed and used as controls. Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions at the animal facility Forschungszentrum Beutenberg, Zentrale Experimentelle Tierhaltung, University Hospital Jena, Germany, according to European and German animal welfare regulations.
Systemic C. albicans infection was performed as described previously [15]. Briefly, co-housed male and female CEABAC10-transgenic mice (CEA) and their wild-type littermates (WT) (at least 10 weeks old and weighing at least 16 g) were injected with 2.5 × 104 CFU C. albicans/g body weight or 1 × 104 CFU C. albicans/g body weight via the lateral tail vein. After the infection, mice were scored at least twice a day and sacrificed when they reached a humane endpoint, as described in [15]. Log rank comparison of the survival curves was performed with the GraphPad PRISM software version 5. For analyses at pre-defined time points after infection, mice were infected as described above with 1 × 104 CFU C. albicans/g body weight (“Ca”). Control mice received endotoxin-free buffered saline solution (“PBS”; InVivoPure pH 6.5 Dilution Buffer, Hoelzel Diagnostika GmbH, Köln, Germany; vehicle control). After infection, the health status of the mice was examined as described in [15], and the mice were sacrificed after 24 h (PBS and Ca) or 72 h (Ca). Since the vehicle control, PBS, does not result in any immune reaction [15] and any reaction due to the stress of the application would be only short-lived, no additional PBS group was analyzed at 72 h. Note that one PBS-injected CEABAC10 mouse was removed from all analyses after histological analysis identified a high-grade hydronephrosis with associated, presumably ascending pyelonephritis that was not associated with the experiment.
Post-mortem analyses: When the mice reached deep anesthesia, blood was taken retro-orbitally and analyzed in an automated hemocytometer (Mindray 5300Vet Hematology Analyzer, Mindray, Darmstadt, Germany). Peripheral blood for the determination of cytokine levels and glycoproteome analysis (see below) was obtained via cardiac puncture, kept at room temperature for 1 h and centrifuged at 1500× g for 15 min without break in order to obtain serum. Aliquots were kept at −80 °C until further analysis. During necropsy, the kidneys, spleen, liver, and brain were removed, weighed and either fixed immediately in Roti Histofix 4% (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) and transferred into ethanol the next day or kept on ice in 1–3 mL PBS until homogenization. For pathohistological analysis, a representative section from all organs was stained with hematoxylin and eosin and evaluated histopathologically. For visualization of fungal structures, a PAS reaction and Grocott methenamine silver staining were performed. Histological preparations were digitalized with an Aperio CS2 (Whole Slide Scanner, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany), and the size, area, and numbers of inflammatory foci in the kidneys were quantified using the Image-Scope software (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). For development, validation, evaluation, and statistical analysis, all embedded in the visual programming language JIPipe [30] “https://jipipe.hki-jena.de/” (accessed on 18 November 2021), where the automated image processing of C. albicans in mouse kidneys was realized using deep learning, please refer to the Supplementary Methods. DAB (3, 3′-diaminobenzidine) immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections was performed after dewaxing (3 × xylol, 100% ethanol, 96% ethanol, 70% ethanol, distilled water, 10 min), followed by citrate buffer, pH 6.0, at 96 °C for 30 min. After cooling, sections were washed with PBS and blocked with 1% BSA/PBS. Consecutive sections were incubated with 10 µg/mL 1H7-4B, anti-NE (neutrophil elastase) antibody (Abcam, ab68672, Abcam/Danaher, Cambridge, UK), and IgG control antibody (BioGenex, Rabbit NEGATIVE CONTROL, Biogenex, Fremont, CA, USA), followed by goat-anti-rabbit-Conjugate (Vector, VEC-BA-1000, Biozol, Hamburg, Germany), and developed using DAB (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). CFUs were determined by plating dilutions of organ homogenates on yeast extract–peptone–dextrose (YPD) agar plates with 80 µg/mL chloramphenicol. The detection limits were as follows: 50 CFU/g kidneys and liver; 100 CFU/g spleen; 85 CFU/g brain. For Multiplex analysis (Cytokine Mouse Magnetic 20-Plex Panel for the Luminex platform, Thermo Fischer GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) or ELISA (mouse IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-A Ready Set Go, both eBioscience/Thermo Fischer GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany; mouse IFNγ, BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany), homogenates were centrifuged immediately at 3000× g, 4 °C, for 10 min and aliquots of supernatants were kept at −80 °C until analysis. For analysis of bone marrow cells, femurs were removed and kept in PBS on ice until the cell isolation procedures. The expression of human CEACAMs in bone marrow-derived leukocytes fixed in 4% PFA/PBS was determined by flow cytometry. Cells were blocked in 500 µL of 10% BSA/PBS overnight at 4 °C, treated with 1:30 mouse Fc block (eBioscience/Thermo Fischer GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) for 30 min at 4 °C, and stained and analyzed as described in the Respective (Supplemental) Figure Legends with the following antibodies and the corresponding isotype controls: Ly6C PE-Cy 7, Ly6G-APC, huCD66acde-PE (all REA, Miltenyi Biotec Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), B220 PerCP-Cy 5.5, CD3-APC (both eBioscience). Samples were analyzed on an Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) using the FlowJo software version 10.0.6. The expression of human CEACAMs in viable immune cell populations isolated from the kidneys, liver, and spleen was determined by flow cytometry. Cells were stained and analyzed on an Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) using the Attune software v2.1, as described in the respective figure legends with the following antibodies or the corresponding isotype controls: CD45-PE, Ly-6G-PerCP-Vio700, CD3ε-PE-Vio770, CD19-APC, F4/80-FITC, CD45-PE, CD11c-PE-Vio770, CD335-APC (all REA, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), and viability dye eFluor780 (eBioscience/Thermo Fischer GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany).
Glycoproteome analysis. Glycoprotein enrichment from serum: After thawing, 20 µL serum was added to 20 µL 4% SDS in PBS and heated for 5 min at 95 °C. After cooling to room temperature, 60 µL of PBS was added and the mixture was centrifuged at 20,000× g for 10 min at RT. The supernatant was used to enrich for glycoproteins as described in [31]. Trypsin-released peptides and PNGase F-released N-glycopeptides were collected and dried in a SpeedVac (Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). Shotgun MS proteomics: Samples were reconstituted in 0.3% formic acid and peptide concentrations were measured using a NanoDrop spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). Then, 2.5 µg each of tryptic and deglycosylated peptides (former N-glycopeptides) was analyzed in each LC-MS/MS run in duplicates on an Orbitrap Fusion (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 (Thermo Scientific) by a nanoelectrospray ion source. Samples were loaded on a 2 cm C18 trap column (Acclaim PepMap100, Thermo Scientific) and separated using a 2.5 h non-linear gradient (2–80% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid, flow rate: 300 nL/min) on a 50 cm C18 analytical column (75 µm i.d., PepMap RSLC, Thermo Scientific). Full MS scans were acquired with a resolution of 120,000 at m/z 400 in the Orbitrap analyzer (m/z range: 370–1570, quadrupole isolation, isolation window: 1.6). MS1 parent ions were fragmented by higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD, 30% collision energy) and 20 fragment ion spectra were acquired in the ion trap in rapid mode. The following conditions were used: a spray voltage of 2.0 kV, a heated capillary temperature of 275 °C, an S-lens RF level of 60%, and maximum ion accumulation times of 50 ms (AGC 1 × 106) for full scans and 35 ms (AGC 1 × 104) for HCD. Protein identification and quantification: All RAW files were searched against the human UniProt database (version 05.2016, reviewed sequences) with MaxQuant version 1.5.5.1 (Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry) [32]. The parameters were set as follows: main search peptide tolerance: 4.5 ppm; enzyme: trypsin, max. 2 missed cleavages; static modification: cysteine carbamidomethylation; variable modification in the tryptic peptide fraction: methionine oxidation; variable modification in PNGase F fractions: methionine oxidation and asparagine deamidation. PSMs (peptide-specific matches) and protein FDR were set to 0.01. For advanced identification, the Second Peptide Search in MS2 spectra and the Match Between Runs features were enabled. Label-free quantification of proteins with normalization was done in MaxQuant [32]. The LFQ min. ratio count was set to one. Peptides from both fractions were integrated in the LFQ protein intensity calculations. Only unique and razor peptides, unmodified or modified, were used for quantification. LFQ protein intensities (see Supplementary Table S7) were then loaded into the Perseus framework (Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry) [33]. Known contaminants and reverse identified peptides/proteins were discarded. Intensities were log(2)-transformed and missing values were imputed from the normal distribution of the dataset (width: 0.3, downshift 1.8). A two-sample t-test was used to calculate statistical differences in protein abundances in the compared groups. p-values were adjusted according to Benjamini and Hochberg [34], and proteins demonstrating at least a two-fold expression difference and an adjusted p-value < 0.05 were considered to be significantly changed in abundance. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited with the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository [35] with the dataset identifier PXD061893.
Isolation and analysis of bone marrow-derived neutrophils (BMNs): Young adult mice were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation. BMNs were isolated and assessed for purity and viability as described in [15]. All assays were performed with freshly prepared BMNs in Eppendorf tubes blocked with 10% BSA/PBS for at least 1 h at 37 °C. The concentration of released MPO was determined in cell culture supernatants from BMNs that were either left untreated or stimulated with live C. albicans yeast cells (MOI 10) for 60 min using the mouse MPO ELISA kit (Hycultec GmbH, Beutelsbach, Germany).
C. albicans killing assays were performed using the Colorimetric Cell Viability Kits III (XTT) obtained from Promokine(Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany. For these, 2 × 105 neutrophils in 100 µL RPMI/10% FBS were left unstimulated or were stimulated with 2 × 105 C. albicans cells per well (MOI 1) in a 96-well plate for 30 min at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The C. albicans solution for standards (input) was kept on ice for the incubation times. Just before the following procedures, C. albicans standards (sensitivity: 6500 CFU) were transferred to the 96 well-plate. Triton X-100 was added to all wells to reach a final concentration of 0.3% and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C, 5% CO2, in order inactivate neutrophils. Viable C. albicans cells were quantified by the addition of 50 µL XTT reaction mixture per well and incubation for 3–4 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Absorbance was measured using a TECAN M200 at 450 nm and 630 nm (background). For calculations of C. albicans CFUs, background and blanks were subtracted.
Phagocytosis assays were performed as described in [15]. Briefly, BMNs were stimulated with FITC-labeled C. albicans yeast cells (MOI 20) for 20 min, fixed and counterstained for Hoechst33342 (Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany), mouse anti-mouse CEACAM1 expressed on WT and CEABAC10 BMNs (MSCC1, monoclonal mouse IgG1, Bernhard B. Singer, Essen/highly cross-adsorbed goat anti-mouse-Alexa546, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany), and extracellular C. albicans cells (rabbit-anti Candida, BP1006, Acris antibodies/highly cross-adsorbed goat anti-rabbit-Alexa633, Invitrogen, Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). Micrographs were analyzed for phagocytosis by counting BMNs without contact with C. albicans cells; BMNs with attached, extracellular C. albicans cells (FITC staining and anti-Candida antibody staining); and BMNs with intracellular (phagocytosed) C. albicans cells (FITC staining only) with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 710) using the ZEN 2010 software (both Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany).
All flow cytometric analyses of BMNs were performed on an Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) using the Attune software v2.1. The expression of CD11b and human CEACAM3 and CEACAM6 and their relative fluorescence intensities on BMNs was determined in cells either left untreated or stimulated with UV-killed C. albicans germ tubes (MOI 10) for 60 min. Cells were stained using viability dye eFluor780 (eBiosciences/Thermo Fischer GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), anti-CD11b-APC (clone REA592, Miltenyi Biotec), and either 308/3-3 (anti-human CEACAM3/5, LeukoCom, Essen, Germany)/highly cross-adsorbed goat anti-mouse IgG1-PE (eBiosciences) or 1H7-4B (anti-human CEACAM6, LeukoCom, Essen, Germany)/highly cross-adsorbed goat anti-mouse IgG1-PE (eBiosciences/Thermo Fischer GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Note that 308/3-3 cross-reacts with CEACAM5 [14] that is not expressed on neutrophils (therefore, we refer to 308/3-3 as “CEACAM3-specific” in the context of this publication). For the analysis of flow cytometry data, dead cells were excluded due to possible false-positive staining. For analysis of apoptosis, BMNs were either left untreated for 2 h or were treated for 2 h with UV-killed C. albicans germ tubes (MOI 10) and stained using the Annexin V Detection Kit APC (eBiosciences/Thermo Fischer GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany). Cells negative for Annexin V and propidium iodide were considered viable. Analysis of intracellular reactive oxygen species was performed as described in [15]. Briefly, BMNs were pre-incubated for 15 min with 1.5 μg/mL dihydro-rhodamine 123 (DHR, Biomol GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) in calcium- and magnesium-free PBS/2.5% BSA and either left untreated or stimulated with UV-killed C. albicans germ tubes (MOI 10) for another 15 min. Cells were washed in calcium- and magnesium-free PBS, fixed in 1% PFA/PBS for 10 min, blocked with PBS/50% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, and washed with PBS/2% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum.
Differentiation and analysis of bone marrow-derived monocytes (BMMs) and macrophages (BMDMs): Young adult mice were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation. Isolated bone marrow cells were differentiated into BMMs (non-adherent cells, 5–7 days) and BMDMs (adherent cells, 7 days) in RPMI/25 ng/mL recombinant mouse M-CSF (ImmunoTools GmbH, Friesoythe, Germany). The medium was exchanged every other day (non-adherent cells were collected by centrifugation). CEACAM6 expression was determined by flow cytometry using eFluor 780 (eBioscience/Thermo Fischer GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) and the following antibodies (all Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany): CD66c-PE/REA414 (CEACAM6), F4/80-FITC/REA126, CD11b-APC/REA892, CD11c-PE-Vio770/REA754, and CD62L-APC/REA828, as described in the Respective Figure Legends and Supplementary Figure Legends. All flow cytometric analyses of BMNs and BMDMs were performed on an Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) using the Attune software v2.1.
For stimulation, C. albicans was opsonized (2 × 108/1 mL of serum, incubation on ice for at least one hour, removal of serum by RPMI wash). In all stimulations longer than 6 h, treatment of the cells with Amphotericin B was included to prevent excessive growth of hyphae (1 µg/mL, added after 1 h of stimulation). For the phagocytosis assay, C. albicans cells were labelled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) prior to the experiment (see above). For ELISAs, 5 × 105 BMNs and BMDMs in 500 µL medium were seeded in 24-well-plates and were either left untreated or were stimulated for 24 h at MOI 1. Concentrations of mouse cytokines IL-1β (eBioscience/Thermo Fischer GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), IL-6 (Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany), CCL2 (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany), and TNFα (Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) were determined according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To quantify the overall C. albicans-induced cell death, BMDMs were seeded in 48-well-plates at a density of 2.5 × 105 cells in 250 µL of medium. Following 24 h of C. albicans stimulation at MOI 1, SYTOXTM Green (Invitrogen, Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) was added to the cells to a final concentration of 200 nM and incubated for 10 min in the dark at 37 °C 5% CO2. Two images per well were taken at 20× magnification using the Vert.A1 + AxioCam MRc (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and exported as .tiff files from ZEN software (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). Cells were counted using the multi-point tool in Image J version 1.53 (open source). Phase-contrast images were used to count all cells, and dead cells were counted in the SYTOXTM Green channel. For analysis of phagocytosis, 2.5 × 105 BMDMs/well were seeded in collagen-coated 8-well chambers (Permanox, Nunc Lab-TEK, Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) in 500 µL of medium and stimulated at an MOI 5 with FITC-labeled C. albicans for 20 min. Cells were washed twice with pre-warmed PBS, fixed with 250 µL 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at RT, and blocked with 200 µL 10% BSA/PBS at 4 °C overnight. Mouse Fc-block (eBioscience/Thermo Fischer GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) was added for 30 min, and rabbit-anti-Candida antibody (BP1006, Acris antibodies) was added at 5 µg/mL for 1 h. Cells were washed three times with PBS, and goat anti-rabbit-Alexa Fluor 633 antibody (1:200, Invitrogen, Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) and Hoechst33342 (1:1000, Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) in 5% BSA/PBS were added. Cells were washed three times with PBS, chambers were removed, and the slides were dipped consecutively in PBS, water and 70% ethanol. After drying, slides were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium and allowed to harden in the dark overnight at RT and sealed using nail polish. Samples were analyzed with a Cell Observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) using the ZEN2010 software. Intracellular Ca and BMDM-associated extracellular Ca were quantified, and the amount of extracellular Ca was divided by the amount of intracellular plus associated Ca, giving the phagocytosis index.
Human liver section analysis: Human PFA-fixed, paraffin-embedded liver sections were incubated at room temperature consecutively with xylol (2 × 15 min), 100% ethanol, 96% ethanol, 70% ethanol, and distilled water (each for 10 min), followed by Tris-EDTA buffer, pH 9.0, at boiling temperature for 15 min. After cooling, sections were washed with PBS and blocked with 1% BSA/PBS; incubated with monoclonal rabbit-anti-CD68 antibody (EPR20545, Abcam) and mouse anti-CEACAM6 1H7-4B (LeukoCom, Essen, Germany) at 10 µg/mL in 0.5% BSA overnight at 4 °C in a humid chamber; washed and incubated with “Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody -Alexa Fluor 660” (Thermo Scientific Darmstadt, Germany) and “Alexa Flour 546 Goat anti Mouse IgG (H+L)” (Invitrogen GmbH, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany), each at 1:200 in 0.5% BSA, and 1:5000 Hoechst 33342” (Thermo Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) for 1 h at RT. Slides were washed twice with PBS. After drying, slides were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium (Biozol, Hamburg, Germany), allowed to harden in the dark overnight at RT, and sealed using nail polish. Samples were analyzed with an Axio Observer.Z1/7 microscope using the ZEN 2010 software (both produced by Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany).
Human alveolar macrophage analysis: Cells from human bronchoalveolar lavage were stained for CD169-PE (marker for alveolar macrophages), CD66b-FITC (marker for human neutrophils), and CEACAM6 (CD66c-PE-Vio770) (all REA, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and analyzed on an Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) using the Attune software v2.1.
Human peripheral monocyte analysis: Human PBMCs were isolated and stained directly using anti-CD14-FITC (REA, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), anti-CD66c.PE-Vio770 (CEACAM6, REA, Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), and eFluor780. Cells were analyzed on an on an Attune Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) using the Attune software v2.1.
Statistical analysis: Except for proteomics data (see glycoproteome analysis), statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.04 Software. For parametric data with 2 groups, an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-tests was performed; for matched pairs, a paired, two-tailed Student’s t-test was performed. For non-matched parametric data with more than 2 groups, One-Way ANOVA with Bonferroni post-tests was performed. In case of exponential data (CFUs, relative fluorescence intensity), log(10)-transformed data were used for statistical analysis. In case of samples with no detectable CFU counts, statistical analysis was performed twice, inserting either 0.1 or the respective detection limit; the outcome was “not significant” in both cases. In the present manuscript, p-values for the former analysis are given. The significance level was 0.05 for all analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Human CEACAM-Transgenic CEABAC10 Mice Are More Susceptible to Systemic Candidiasis

In an intravenous infection model using two different infectious doses, our results showed a marked increase in susceptibility to systemic candidiasis and earlier death of CEABAC10 mice (CEA) compared to their wild-type (WT) littermates (Figure 1A and Figure S1A). Proinflammatory cytokine responses were indistinguishable at 24 h post-infection (p.i.) in WT and CEABAC10 mice, but at 72 h p.i., CEABAC10 mice exhibited significantly elevated serum levels of IL-6, TNFα, GM-CSF, IL-2, IL-4, CXCL10, and VEGF, indicative of an exacerbated inflammatory response (Figure 1B–D and Figure S2). Moreover, CEABAC10 mice displayed a diminished count of neutrophils and monocytes in their blood 24 h p.i., suggesting an enhanced recruitment of peripheral leukocytes into infected tissue (Figure 1E,F). Analysis of bone marrow cell populations revealed no disparities in hematopoiesis between CEABAC10 and WT mice during infection (Figure S3). Additionally, CEABAC10 mice exhibited a significant reduction in platelet numbers 24 h p.i., along with enlarged platelet volumes 72 h p.i., suggesting increased consumption and subsequent replenishment (Figure S4), indicative of increased bleeding and thrombosis typical of septic progression [36].
To explore the inflammatory response and heightened susceptibility of CEABAC10 mice to systemic candidiasis in more detail, we conducted an analysis of serum glycoproteome changes (Figure 2). Principal component analysis revealed that samples from mice injected with PBS separated from those infected with C. albicans at 24 h and 72 h. In addition, CEABAC10 sera notably diverged from WT samples at 72 h p.i. (Figure 2A).
Consistent with the principal component analysis, the comparison between PBS control-treated and C. albicans-infected WT mice revealed 29 and 103 differentially expressed serum glycoproteins at 24 h p.i. and 72 h p.i., respectively (Figure 2B,C and Tables S1 and S2). No significant differences in serum glycoprotein abundance were detected between PBS-treated WT and CEABAC10 control mice or between WT and CEABAC10 animals 24 h p.i. (Figure 2D,E). In contrast, at 72 h p.i., the serum glycoprotein composition between WT and CEABAC10 mice revealed significant changes. Overall, 51 glycoproteins were differentially abundant in serum, with 14 showing higher abundance in CEABAC10 mice and 37 elevated in WT animals (Figure 2F and Table S3). Pathway analysis with Qiagens IPA software revealed a robust activation of the acute phase response in C. albicans-infected WT animals at 24 h p.i. that further progressed at 72 h p.i., accompanied by changes in proteins associated with the activity of the coagulation and complement system and LXR/RXR and FXR/RXR responses (Figure 2G,H and Tables S4 and S5). In comparison to WT animals, CEABAC10 mice revealed a stronger acute phase response at 72 h p.i. and alterations in coagulation, complement und prothrombin pathways (Figure 2I, Table S6). Consequently, the serum glycoproteome data suggest an exacerbation of the systemic septic response in CEABAC10 mice initiated by C. albicans infection.

3.2. Infected Kidneys of CEABAC10 Mice Display Pronounced Purulent Necrotizing Nephritis 72 h p.i.

To further explore disease progression, we next investigated inflammatory responses in various organs after C. albicans infection in more detail. The kidney is the main target organ in the murine intravenous model of systemic candidiasis [37]. Examination of hematoxylin–eosin (HE)-stained kidney sections revealed renal inflammation 24 h p.i. in both WT and CEABAC10 mice (Figure 3A–D and Figure S1B,D). Subsequently, from 24 h to 72 h p.i., the extent of kidney inflammation escalated in CEABAC10 but remained relatively stable in WT mice (Figure 3A–D and Figure S1C,E). This was evidenced by the higher inflammation score (Figure 3A), the increased number of inflammatory foci (Figure 3B), and the larger total area of inflamed tissue (Figure 3D). Interestingly, the mean area of inflammatory foci remained similar between WT and CEABAC10 kidneys (Figure 3C). The heightened degree of kidney inflammation in infected CEABAC10 mice was further underscored by significantly higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and IL-1β, Figure 3E,F; IL-1α, Figure S5), chemo-attractants (CCL2/MCP-1, Figure 3G; CCL3/MIP1 α and CXCL1/KC, Figure S5), and growth factors (bFGF and GM-CSF, Figure S5) in CEABAC10 kidney homogenates at 72 h p.i.
In the kidneys of infected CEABAC10 mice, immune cell populations exhibit a notable relative decrease in NK cells (Figure S6C) but a significant relative increase in neutrophils (Figure 3H) at 72 h p.i. There was an observed increase in fungal burden, measured in CFU (Figure 3I), visualized by histology (Figure 3J,K), and quantified by automated image analysis of the area covered by fungi (Figure S6F). Also, hyphal growth was increased in CEABAC10 kidneys (Figure 3J–L and Figure S6G). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed that CEACAM6 was exclusively present in neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages in CEABAC10 kidney sections (Figure 3M,N). Due to its high glycosylation [25], CEACAM6 is proteolytically stable, and its presence was detectable in areas with high counts of damaged/deceased immune cells at 72 h p.i., particularly on neutrophils (Figure 3M,N). IHC analysis of consecutive sections for neutrophil elastase (Figure 3O), detectable only in viable neutrophils, indicated that dead cells outnumbered viable neutrophils. Consequently, the quantification of viable neutrophils by flow cytometry likely underestimated the extent of increased neutrophil recruitment into inflamed CEABAC10 kidney tissue.

3.3. The Expression of Human CEACAM3 and CEACAM6 Does Not Alter the Response of Bone Marrow-Derived Neutrophils to C. albicans In Vitro

Neutrophils play a pivotal role in the host response against C. albicans [3], yet they also contribute to pathogenesis by inflammation-driven tissue damage [38,39]. The enhanced recruitment of neutrophils, coupled with a higher fungal burden and increased numbers of inflammatory foci in the kidneys of CEABAC10 mice, implied a potential reduction in the antifungal activity of these cells. Thus, we sought to investigate the response of bone marrow-derived neutrophils (BMNs) to C. albicans infection in vitro. CEABAC10 BMNs express CEACAM3 and CEACAM6 on their cell surfaces (Figure 4A,B), both of which regulate various human neutrophil functions such as pathogen recognition and uptake, modulation of apoptosis, and adhesion to endothelial cells [14,40,41,42]. Given that CEACAM6 is also present in primary/azurophilic granules of human neutrophils and can be de-granulated to increase the cell surface expression level upon neutrophil activation [40], we assessed the expression of human CEACAM receptors on transgenic BMNs by flow cytometry. Upon stimulation of CEABAC10-derived BMNs with C. albicans, a significant increase in both human CEACAM3 and CEACAM6 on BMN cell surfaces was observed (Figure 4C,D), indicating similar behavior of the receptors in transgenic murine neutrophils.
The integrin CD11b/CD18 (CR3, αMβ2, MO-1, and Mac-1) plays a crucial role in mediating neutrophil extravasation. CR3 can be activated and upregulated upon human neutrophil activation and ligation of CEACAM3 and CEACAM6 [42]. Stimulation of BMNs with C. albicans led to a similar increase in cell surface-associated CD11b in both WT and CEABAC10 cells (Figure 4E), indicating similar activation states of BMNs after C. albicans recognition. Furthermore, no discernible differences related to spontaneous or C. albicans-induced neutrophil death, binding and phagocytosis of C. albicans, or fungal killing were observed in isolated BMNs from WT and CEABAC10 mice in vitro (Figure 4F–H). While a slightly higher basal level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was detected in CEABAC10 BMNs, the quantities of ROS induced by C. albicans were comparable between WT and CEABAC10 BMNs (Figure 4I). Also, there was no significant difference in the release of proinflammatory CXCL1 (KC), but CEABAC10 BMNs exhibited a less variable and lower release of the degranulation marker myeloperoxidase (Figure 4J,K).
In summary, the expression of human CEACAM3 and CEACAM6 did not fundamentally alter the interaction of BMNs with C. albicans in vitro. However, the microenvironment of inflamed tissues may well influence neutrophil behavior in vivo, and the elevated numbers of neutrophils likely contribute to heightened inflammation and tissue damage.

3.4. CEABAC10 Mice Develop Acute Hepatic Coagulation Necroses, Purulent Necrotizing Hepatitis, Purulent Splenitis, and Brain Hemorrhage During Systemic Candidiasis

Following intravenous infection of WT mice, C. albicans is typically cleared from the liver over time without causing visible tissue alterations [37], a trend also observed in our experiments (Figure 5A,C). In contrast, at necropsy 72 h p.i., prominent white areas were evident on the livers of 15 out of 18 CEABAC10 samples (Figure 5B,C). Histologically, these alterations correlated with multifocal acute coagulation necroses with immune cell infiltrations (Figure 5D–F). Notably, these lesions were strictly vascular-associated, predominantly periportally localized, and nearly exclusive to CEABAC10 livers (Figure 5G). The onset of coagulation necroses and immune cell infiltrations was detected microscopically as early as 24 h p.i., intensifying in numbers and size by 72 h p.i. (Figure 5G), when they became macroscopically visible. Additionally, acute purulent necrotizing hepatitis was observed in 6 out of 11 CEABAC10 mice 72 h p.i., contrasting with the absence of such findings in WT animals (Figure 5H).
The inflammatory nature of these lesions was evident through the higher relative numbers of neutrophils and macrophages detected by flow cytometry in livers of CEABAC10 mice (Figure 5I,J), accompanied by elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in liver homogenates (IL-6, CCL2/MCP-1, CCL3/MIP-1α, and CXCL10/IP-10; Figure 5K–M and Figure S9). While the proportion of monocytes among hepatic immune cells was comparable between WT and CEABAC10 mice, there was a tendency towards a relative reduction in NK cell, T cell, and B cell numbers in CEABAC10 livers 72 h p.i. (Figure S10). Despite the heightened inflammation in the livers of CEABAC10 mice, the total fungal burden in the liver tissue was comparable to that of WT animals (Figure 5N). Similar to the kidneys, only neutrophils, along with macrophages and monocytes stained positive for CEACAM6 (Figure S10) and live, neutrophil elastase (NE)-positive granulocytes, were outnumbered by dead CEACAM6-posive neutrophils and macrophages 72 h p.i. (Figure S10).
In addition to the liver pathology, severe purulent splenitis was also observed in 8 out of 11 CEABAC10 mice at 72 h p.i., a condition only detected in 1 out of 7 WT mice (Figure 5R). Despite this discrepancy in pathology, the composition of immune cell populations and fungal load were not significantly different in spleens of infected WT and CEABAC10 mice (Figure S12 and Figure 5S).
Interestingly, 4 out of 18 CEABAC10 mice exhibited brain hemorrhage at 72 h p.i. at necropsy, which was not seen in any of the 14 WT mice at 72 h (Figure S14). No difference in the severity of encephalitis was observed between the two genotypes, although CEABAC10 brains displayed higher fungal burdens and higher hyphae scores (Figure S14). Similar to other organs, CEACAM6 expression in the brain was restricted to neutrophils and some macrophages (Figure S14), and dead CEACAM6-positive neutrophils and macrophages outnumbered viable, neutrophil elastase (NE)-positive granulocytes (Figure S14).

3.5. CEACAM6 Expression on Monocytes, but Not Macrophages, Leads to Increased Cytokine Production in Response to C. albicans

The activation of leukocytes induces increased expression of CEACAMs on their surfaces [40]. In evaluating the activation of myeloid cells following systemic candidiasis, we focused on assessing the expression of CEACAM6 that is expressed by neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages in CEABAC10 mice. The proportion of CEACAM6+ neutrophils increased from approximately 80% to nearly 100% at 72 h p.i. in the kidneys, liver, and spleen (Figure 6A,D,G). While CEACAM6+ monocytes were scarce in PBS control mice, their numbers increased to approximately 50% of the total monocyte population in the kidneys, liver, and spleen at 72 h p.i. (Figure 6B,E,H).
In macrophages, the CEACAM6+ subpopulation remained remarkably stable during infection of kidneys and spleen. Approximately 6% of all macrophages in the kidneys (Figure 6C) and around 10% in the spleen (Figure 6I) were CEACAM6-positive cells. Interestingly, a contrasting scenario unfolded in the liver: Here, a substantial proportion of CEACAM6+ macrophages (approximately 40%) was observed in PBS-treated control animals (Figure 6F). However, this population dropped below 10% within 24 h p.i. and remained low at 72 h p.i. (Figure 6F). One plausible explanation for the reduced proportion of CEACAM6+ macrophages is macrophage cell death, as only viable cells were quantified by flow cytometry, and a substantial number of CEACAM6+ dead cells, including macrophages, were visible in immunohistochemistry (Figure 5P).
Since the expression of CEACAM3 and CEACAM6 did not influence BMN interaction with or response to C. albicans, we postulated that CEACAM6+ transgenic macrophages and monocytes are crucial for the heightened inflammatory response observed in CEABAC10 mice during systemic candidiasis. We therefore studied responses to C. albicans infection in transgenic and WT bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) in vitro. The majority of BMDMs stained positive for CEACAM6 (Figure 7A,B). While phagocytosis of C. albicans was slightly but significantly higher in CEABAC10 BMDMs (Figure 7C), C. albicans-induced macrophage cell death was comparable between both WT and CEABAC10 BMDMs (Figure 7D). These findings suggest that macrophage expression of CEACAM6 per se is not the primary factor responsible for the substantial number of dead hepatic macrophages observed after infection in vivo (Figure 6F). Moreover, the release of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα was not significantly affected by CEACAM6 expression in BMDMs (Figure 7D–F).
In CEABAC10 bone marrow-derived monocytes (BMMs), only the classical subset (CD62L+/CD11c) and not the non-classical subset (CD62L/CD11c+) expressed CEACAM6 on the surface (Figure 8A–D). Nevertheless, this mixed population of CEABAC10-derived BMMs with >50% CEACAM6+ cells demonstrated significantly increased production of IL-6 and CCL2/MIP-1α after C. albicans infection compared to WT BMMs, aligning with the higher cytokine production observed in mouse tissues in vivo. In contrast, the amount of secreted TNFα and IL-1β after infection was comparable in both WT- and CEABAC10-derived BMMs irrespective of CEACAM6 expression.
The identification of a specific subset of macrophages expressing CEACAM6 in the livers of transgenic mice aligns with the results from the analysis of human liver sections, where a substantial portion of resident CD68+ macrophages [43] were also positive for CEACAM6 (Figure S17). Additionally, closely mirroring this pattern, about one-third of CD169+ alveolar macrophages [44], as detected via flow cytometry in cell pellets from human bronchoalveolar lavage samples, were CEACAM6-positive (Figure S18). In contrast to CEABAC10 monocytes (Figure 6B,E,H), peripheral monocytes isolated from fresh blood of healthy human volunteers showed no detectable surface expression of CEACAM6 (Figure S19).

4. Discussion

CEACAM family receptors play a crucial role in regulating immune functions during infections and cancer [8,25,45]. CEACAM1 is recruited and activated by bacterial and viral pathogens to suppress immune responses [8,25,45]. Conversely, CEACAM6 primarily functions as an adhesin for human pathogens like AIEC, Neisseria spec., and Acinetobacter baumannii, permitting colonization and invasion of cells and tissues without directly affecting host responses [10,13,21]. CEABAC10 mice [20] serve as a valuable model for studying interactions of human pathogens with CEACAM3, CEACAM5, and CEACAM6, both in vivo and in vitro [13,21,22,23,46,47]. In this study, we explored the impact of their expression on the host response to systemic candidiasis.
CEABAC10 mice exhibited a heightened susceptibility and accelerated mortality in response to systemic C. albicans infection. This increased vulnerability can be at least partially attributed to an exacerbated systemic immune response, characterized by elevated cytokine levels and an intensified acute phase response, in line with the contribution of progressive sepsis to death of mice systemically infected with C. albicans [48]. In addition, increasing fungal burden in the kidneys as the primary target organ [37] leads to renal failure [48]. Here, we found that CEABAC10 kidneys were severely affected at 72 h p.i. with increased inflammation and fungal burden, indicating that both augmented immunopathology and reduced ability to control fungal growth contributed to the increased susceptibility of transgenic mice.
Neutrophils are crucial for host defense against systemic candidiasis [3], and they express functional CEACAM3 [23] and CEACAM6 [8,25]. Thus, functional impairment of transgenic neutrophils would explain the higher fungal burden, and increased recruitment of neutrophils in CEABAC10 mice in response to the high fungal load likely resulted in increased renal injury [49,50]. However, we found no evidence of reduced anti-fungal activity of CEABAC10 BMNs in vitro. Possibly, neutrophil behavior in vivo is influenced by infection-specific alterations in the tissue environment that were absent in the BMN experiments in vitro. In inflamed organs, the local microenvironment markedly alters neutrophil behavior, often amplifying their inflammatory and tissue-damaging functions. Elevated cytokines and chemokines, such as those observed in candidemic CEABAC10 mice, prime neutrophils, prolong their survival, and lower activation thresholds [51]. Hypoxia and metabolic stress further sustain neutrophil activity and promote effector functions, including reactive oxygen species production and neutrophil extracellular trap formation [52]. In addition, damage-associated molecular patterns and interactions with endothelial, epithelial, and immune cells reprogram neutrophils toward persistent activation and tissue retention [53]. Together, these cues shift neutrophils from short-lived, self-limiting antimicrobial responders to prolonged drivers of inflammation, contributing to tissue injury. Our serum glycoproteome analysis showed markedly dysregulated levels of several matrix proteins and secreted/shed immunoregulatory receptors and enzymes in CEABAC10 serum, including the key enzyme for heparan sulfate chain initiation, EXTL2. In mouse models of vulvovaginal candidiasis, heparan sulfate in the vaginal environment of susceptible mice serves as a competitive ligand for Mac-1 on neutrophils, effectively rendering the neutrophils unable to bind to C. albicans to initiate killing [54]. Pathway analysis of the serum glycoproteomes of WT and CEABAC10 mice 72 h p.i. further identified a dysregulation of the LXR/RXR activation, which regulates neutrophil functions [55] as well as monocyte/macrophage cytokine release [56,57].
Interestingly, CEABAC10 livers also showed clear inflammatory changes and tissue damage. This was unexpected because in WT mice, liver infection is normally controlled by the murine immune system, and tissue architecture is preserved without evident inflammatory changes, except for the transient accumulation of both neutrophils and mononuclear phagocytes [37]. The acute coagulation necroses in livers concurred with thrombocytopenia in candidemic CEABAC10 animals. Alterations in the changes in proteins associated with the activity of coagulation pathways and the complement system identified in serum glycoproteomics are likely inducers of this pathology. While C. albicans infection alone affected both pathways, the dysregulation was further enhanced in CEABAC10 mice. Thus, expression of human CEACAM receptors in the transgenic mice worsened endothelial dysfunction and micro-thrombosis, which are known to be induced by sepsis. In LPS-treated rats, higher pro-inflammatory cytokine levels also coincide with elevated coagulation [58]. C. albicans-stimulated CEABAC10 bone marrow-derived monocytes released substantially increased amounts of IL-6 and CCL2/MIP-1α, consistent with their marked increase in vivo in infected CEABAC10 mice. Monocytes closely control the early host reaction to C. albicans infection, primarily by secretion of various cytokines and chemokines, including IL6 and CCL2/MIP-1α [59,60,61]. Enhanced numbers of monocytic phagocytes can also lead to tissue damage, as shown by mouse liver injury exacerbated by CCL2-mediated monocyte/macrophage recruitment [62]. In fact, our data suggested that CEABAC10 monocytes and macrophages were among the driving forces behind the observed systemic inflammation and organ damage, acutely affecting the liver. Recently, an increasing number of publications have focused on the role of monocytic phagocytes in systemic candidiasis [3,63].
As the primary immune cells in naive tissues, tissue-resident macrophages are essential for innate host defense against C. albicans infection [63]. CCL2 further enhances monocyte recruitment to inflammatory sites, where they differentiate into macrophages [63,64], as we found in CEABAC10 livers 72 h p.i. CEABAC10 liver macrophages showed a contrasting behavior with the loss of all CEACAM6+ macrophages within 24 h p.i. and a strongly increased total number of CEACAM6- macrophages. Regrettably, bone marrow-derived CEABAC10 macrophages were not a useful tool to study the role of macrophages during C. albicans infection, probably due to the marked heterogeneity of macrophage populations as a function of their microenvironment, as reviewed in detail previously [3,63,65]. However, in a CX3CR1 knock-out mouse model, the dysfunction of tissue macrophages was associated with a higher fungal and higher neutrophil counts in the kidneys, renal failure, and shortened survival [66]. As in most murine studies of systemic C. albicans infection, the liver was not further analyzed in this study [66] as it is usually not severely affected [37].
In CEABAC10 mice, the liver as the key integrator of microbial responses [67] was likely central to the exacerbation of sepsis progression via enhanced activation of the acute phase response elicited by the increased levels of monocyte-derived IL-6. During microbial infection, IL-6 induces the liver to switch from tolerogenic towards immunogenic responses and initiate the production of acute phase proteins [67,68]. In mice as well as in human patients, serum levels of IL-6 are closely related to the severity and outcome of sepsis [69,70]. In fact, IL-6 is the major factor that induces a systemic inflammatory response syndrome in mouse models of sepsis [71], furthered by inflammation and coagulation that promote organ dysfunction [36].
The rapid septic progression in CEABAC10 mice driven by the liver may have obscured further roles of CEACAM6 receptors on monocytes and tissue macrophages in other organs [72]. For example, CEABAC10 brains showed increased fungal burden and hemorrhage. C. albicans enters the brain by damaging the blood–brain barrier [73], and microglia promote the recruitment of neutrophils to the brain, which mediate fungal clearance [73,74]. Further studies will be needed to address the possible role of CEACAM6 expression on microglia and other immune cells that may further impair blood vessel permeability.
This study confirms the results of our previous research on human neutrophils [14], which showed that CEACAM6 expression plays a role in enhancing the responses triggered by other receptors upon C. albicans infection rather than directly initiating a response. While CEACAM1 shows very similar behavior to CEACAM6 in response to C. albicans infection on human neutrophils [14], mice transgenic for human CEACAM1 show no difference in their response to systemic candidiasis compared to their WT littermates [15]. In human neutrophils, CEACAM6 can influence different pattern recognition receptor pathways, including Toll-like receptor (TLR), NOD-like receptor, and c-type lectin receptor signaling. However, results from TLR2- and TLR-4-deficient mice infected with C. albicans remain controversial, and the consequences of TLR knock-out for survival and fungal burden depend on the genetic background, fungal strain, and infection dose [75]. Therefore, it remains unclear if TLR interference by CEACAM6 might contribute to the increased susceptibility of CEABAC10 mice. Dectin-1 deficiency renders mice susceptible to C. albicans infection due to impaired neutrophil, monocyte, and macrophage recruitment and responses, including impaired cytokine release, after infection, even in the presence of opsonins [76]. This is in stark contrast to increased recruitment of leucocytes and immunopathology observed with CEABAC10 mice, making it unlikely that the interference of CEACAM6 with Dectin-1 signaling contributed to the observed phenotype.
Because of the intravenous route of infection used in this study, we believe that CEACAM6 expression on myeloid cells, particularly monocytes and monocyte-derived cells, rather than mucosal CEACAM expression, led to the exacerbated systemic inflammatory response syndrome found in the CEABAC10 mice. While there are some early publications indicating the expression of CEACAM6 (also named CD66c, NCA-50/90, non-specific cross-reacting antigen) on human monocytic cells and tissue macrophages [26,27,28], we were only able to verify the expression of CEACAM6 in human tissue macrophages. Tissue-resident macrophages are key immune sentinels that maintain tissue homeostasis and play a central role in the clearance of inhaled and blood-borne pathogens [77,78]. They display pronounced plasticity, dynamically adopting pro- or anti-inflammatory states in response to local microenvironmental cues [77,78]. Analogous to its functions in neutrophils and epithelial cells [6,14,40,41,42], CEACAM6 may support immune surveillance and cell–cell communication within tissues, enabling macrophages to integrate signals from epithelial cells, endothelia, and other leukocytes. Through these interactions, CEACAM6 could modulate activation thresholds, phagocytic capacity, and cytokine production. Under pathological conditions, CEACAM6 may amplify inflammatory circuits by promoting sustained macrophage activation, survival, and pro-inflammatory cytokine release, thereby contributing to tissue injury. Given its established role in neutrophil activation and retention [14,40,41,42], macrophage-expressed CEACAM6 may further engage in self-reinforcing loops that stabilize inflammatory niches, prolong neutrophil persistence, and amplify local cytokine gradients. The microenvironment can, however, also have a contrary effect, removing CEACAM6+ phagocytes, as shown in the present study in the liver of CEABAC10 mice. To date, no data on the role of CEACAM6 on human tissue macrophages are available.
Study limitations are the lack of confirmatory results using depletion experiments or cell-specific knock-out approaches in monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils. Also, the molecular background of CEACAM6-dependent alterations in immune cells derived from CEABAC10 mice need to be explored.
Further studies on the role of CEACAM6+ cells in the liver, especially during infection and/or inflammation, may be of importance for a better understanding of the pathology observed in this study. The role of CEACAM6+ mononuclear phagocytes remains to be further elucidated in primary human cells. Also, the possibility of CEACAM6+ monocyte subpopulations in systemically infected or septic patients should be further explored.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells15080707/s1. Supplementary Figures and Method (PDF file): Figure S1: CEABAC10 mice are more susceptible to systemic C. albicans infection. Survival analysis with an infection dose of 2.5 × 104 CFU/g body weight. Related to Figure 1. Figure S2: CEABAC10 mice display enhanced cytokine levels in peripheral blood during systemic C. albicans infection. Multiplex/ELISA. Related to Figure 1. Figure S3: No differences in bone marrow compositions between WT and CEABAC10 mice during systemic C. albicans infection. Flow cytometry. Figure S4: CEABAC10 mice have reduced white blood cell and platelets in counts in their peripheral blood during systemic C. albicans infection. Automated cytometric analysis of peripheral blood. Related to Figure 1. Figure S5: CEABAC10 mice have enhanced cytokine concentrations in their kidneys during systemic C. albicans infection. Multiplex/ELISA. Related to Figure 3. Figure S6: Immune cell populations in kidneys of WT and CEABAC10 mice during systemic C. albicans infection and automated image analysis of Candida cells kidney sections. Related to Figure 3. Figure S7: Gating of immune cell populations in kidneys. Related to Figure 3 and Figure S6. Figure S8: BMN gating. Related to Figure 4. Figure S9: CEABAC10 mice have enhanced CCL3 and CXCL10 concentrations in their livers during systemic C. albicans infection. Multiplex/ELISA. Related to Figure 5. Figure S10: Immune cell populations in livers of WT and CEABAC10 mice during systemic C. albicans infection. Flow cytometry and IHC. Related to Figure 5. Figure S11: Gating of immune cell populations in livers. Related to Figure 5 and Figure S10. Figure S12: Immune cell populations in spleen during systemic C. albicans infection. Flow cytometry and IHC. Related to Figure 5. Figure S13: Gating of immune cell populations in spleens. Related to Figure S12. Figure S14: CEABAC10 mice display brain hemorrhage but no increase in encephalitis 72 h post-C. albicans infection. Fungal load, histopathologic analysis, IHC. Figure S15: Gating of CEACAM6+ myeloid cells in organs of CEABAC10 mice during systemic C. albicans infection. Related to Figure 6. Figure S16: Gating of bone marrow-derived macrophages and monocytes. Related to Figure 7 and Figure 8. Figure S17: CEACAM6 expression on human liver macrophages. Figure S18: CEACAM6 expression on human alveolar macrophages. Figure S19: No CEACAM6 expression on human peripheral monocytes. Supplementary Methods: Automated image analysis of C. albicans cells in kidney sections. Development, evaluation and detailed results. Supplementary Tables (XLSX-files) S1–S6: Serum glycoproteome analyses. Comparisons of glycoproteomes and pathway analysis of these comparisons. Tables relate to Figure 2B, Figure 2C, Figure 2F, Figure 2G, Figure 2H, and Figure 2I, respectively. Supplementary Table S7: Protein groups (results of glycoproteome analysis). Supplementary Table S8: Source data (dataset). Refs. [79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: E.K. and H.S.; Data curation: E.K., M.M.M., J.S., A.-K.B., S.B., J.E., T.E.K., S.K., K.D., O.K., J.-P.P., M.T.F., T.B., A.G., G.M., I.D.J., and H.S.; Formal analysis: E.K., M.M.M., J.S., A.-K.B., S.B., J.E., T.E.K., S.K., K.D., O.K., and J.-P.P.; Funding acquisition: S.B., J.E., M.T.F., T.B., I.D.J., and H.S.; Investigation: E.K., M.M.M., J.S., A.-K.B., S.B., J.E., T.E.K., S.K., J.-P.P., and I.D.J.; Methodology: E.K., M.M.M., J.S., A.-K.B., S.B., J.E., K.D., O.K., J.-P.P., M.T.F., and I.D.J.; Project administration: E.K. and H.S.; Recourses: K.D., M.T.F., T.B., A.G., G.M., I.D.J., and H.S.; Software: J.-P.P. and M.T.F.; Supervision: M.T.F., I.D.J., and H.S.; Validation: E.K., M.M.M., J.-P.P., and M.T.F.; Visualization: E.K., M.M.M., J.E., K.D., and O.K.; Writing—original draft: E.K.; Writing—review and editing: E.K., M.M.M., J.S., A.-K.B., S.B., J.E., T.E.K., S.K., K.D., O.K., J.-P.P., M.T.F., T.B., A.G., G.M., I.D.J., and H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the German Research Foundation via the Collaborative Research Center/Transregio 124—Pathogenic fungi and their human host: Networks of Interaction (project number 210879364, Project A5 to HS, Project C5 to IDJ and Project B4 to MTF). This work was supported by “Stiftung Oskar Helene Heim” funding number 46-2021. SB and JE were IZKF-Fellows (doctoral scholarships of the Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Klinische Forschung, Jena, Germany). The funders had no role in the study design or the data collection and analysis, nor in the preparation of or decision to publish the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Animal studies were performed in strict accordance with European (the Council of Europe’s European Convention, 18 March 1986, with the revised Annex A 2010/63/EU; The European Parliament and Council Directive 2010/63/EU d 22.09.2010) and German animal welfare regulations and the recommendations of the Society for Laboratory Animal Science (GV-Solas). All experiments were approved by the ethics committee “Beratende Kommission nach §15 Abs. 1 Tierschutzgesetz” and the responsible Federal State authority Thüringer Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz, Bad Langensalza, Germany (Permit No. 02-019/14, 14 November 2014). Studies with human materials were conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent to participate in this study or to allow the use of residual material for research purposes was obtained. Protocols and use of cells for this study were reviewed and approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Ethics Committee of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Medical Faculty (permission numbers 5070-02/17 and 2020–1773, 3 March 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository [32] with the dataset identifier PXD061893. The code used for image analysis (see Supplementary Materials/Supplementary Methods) is available at: https://asbdata.hki-jena.de/Klaile_PraetoriusEtAl (accessed on 15 April 2025).

Acknowledgments

We thank Simone Tänzer, Moira Stark, Birgit Weber and Katja Schubert for their excellent technical assistance. We sincerely thank Bernhard B. Singer (†2024), a close colleague, friend, and leading expert in the field. His constant support, expertise, and groundbreaking design of CEACAM-specific antibodies were instrumental in raising the quality of CEACAM research to a level that would not have been possible without him. His visionary contributions significantly advanced CEACAM research worldwide.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Anne-Katrin Bothe holds the position of scientist at Dynamic42 GmbH but has no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CEACAMCarcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule
C. albicansCandida albicans
CEABACCEACAM bacterial artificial chromosome (in CEABAC10 mice integrated ca. 10 times)
p.i.Post-infection
WTWild type (littermate)

References

  1. Eggimann, P.; Pittet, D. Candida colonization index and subsequent infection in critically ill surgical patients: 20 years later. Intensive Care Med. 2014, 40, 1429–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lopes, J.P.; Lionakis, M.S. Pathogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans. Virulence 2022, 13, 89–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lionakis, M.S. New insights into innate immune control of systemic candidiasis. Med. Mycol. 2014, 52, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Goyal, S.; Castrillon-Betancur, J.C.; Klaile, E.; Slevogt, H. The Interaction of Human Pathogenic Fungi with C-Type Lectin Receptors. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Bourgeois, C.; Kuchler, K. Fungal pathogens—A sweet and sour treat for toll-like receptors. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Klaile, E.; Muller, M.M.; Schafer, M.R.; Clauder, A.K.; Feer, S.; Heyl, K.A.; Stock, M.; Klassert, T.E.; Zipfel, P.F.; Singer, B.B.; et al. Binding of Candida albicans to Human CEACAM1 and CEACAM6 Modulates the Inflammatory Response of Intestinal Epithelial Cells. mBio 2017, 8, e02142-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bonsignore, P.; Kuiper, J.W.P.; Adrian, J.; Goob, G.; Hauck, C.R. CEACAM3—A Prim(at)e Invention for Opsonin-Independent Phagocytosis of Bacteria. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tchoupa, A.K.; Schuhmacher, T.; Hauck, C.R. Signaling by epithelial members of the CEACAM family—Mucosal docking sites for pathogenic bacteria. Cell Commun. Signal. 2014, 12, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Heinrich, A.; Heyl, K.A.; Klaile, E.; Muller, M.M.; Klassert, T.E.; Wiessner, A.; Fischer, K.; Schumann, R.R.; Seifert, U.; Riesbeck, K.; et al. Moraxella catarrhalis induces CEACAM3-Syk-CARD9-dependent activation of human granulocytes. Cell. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 1570–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ambrosi, C.; Scribano, D.; Sarshar, M.; Zagaglia, C.; Singer, B.B.; Palamara, A.T. Acinetobacter baumannii Targets Human Carcinoembryonic Antigen-Related Cell Adhesion Molecules (CEACAMs) for Invasion of Pneumocytes. mSystems 2020, 5, e00604-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Javaheri, A.; Kruse, T.; Moonens, K.; Mejias-Luque, R.; Debraekeleer, A.; Asche, C.I.; Tegtmeyer, N.; Kalali, B.; Bach, N.C.; Sieber, S.A.; et al. Erratum: Helicobacter pylori adhesin HopQ engages in a virulence-enhancing interaction with human CEACAMs. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 2, 16243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tegtmeyer, N.; Ghete, T.D.; Schmitt, V.; Remmerbach, T.; Cortes, M.C.C.; Bondoc, E.M.; Graf, H.L.; Singer, B.B.; Hirsch, C.; Backert, S. Type IV secretion of Helicobacter pylori CagA into oral epithelial cells is prevented by the absence of CEACAM receptor expression. Gut Pathog. 2020, 12, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sarantis, H.; Gray-Owen, S.D. Defining the roles of human carcinoembryonic antigen-related cellular adhesion molecules during neutrophil responses to Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Klaile, E.; Prada Salcedo, J.P.; Klassert, T.E.; Besemer, M.; Bothe, A.K.; Durotin, A.; Muller, M.M.; Schmitt, V.; Luther, C.H.; Dittrich, M.; et al. Antibody ligation of CEACAM1, CEACAM3, and CEACAM6, differentially enhance the cytokine release of human neutrophils in responses to Candida albicans. Cell. Immunol. 2022, 371, 104459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Klaile, E.; Muller, M.M.; Zubiria-Barrera, C.; Brehme, S.; Klassert, T.E.; Stock, M.; Durotin, A.; Nguyen, T.D.; Feer, S.; Singer, B.B.; et al. Unaltered Fungal Burden and Lethality in Human CEACAM1-Transgenic Mice During Candida albicans Dissemination and Systemic Infection. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hirai, A.; Ohtsuka, N.; Ikeda, T.; Taniguchi, R.; Blau, D.; Nakagaki, K.; Miura, H.S.; Ami, Y.; Yamada, Y.K.; Itohara, S.; et al. Role of mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) receptor murine CEACAM1 in the resistance of mice to MHV infection: Studies of mice with chimeric mCEACAM1a and mCEACAM1b. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 6654–6666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  17. Zhang, Z.; La Placa, D.; Nguyen, T.; Kujawski, M.; Le, K.; Li, L.; Shively, J.E. CEACAM1 regulates the IL-6 mediated fever response to LPS through the RP105 receptor in murine monocytes. BMC Immunol. 2019, 20, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zoller, J.; Ebel, J.F.; Khairnar, V.; Schmitt, V.; Klopfleisch, R.; Meiners, J.; Seiffart, V.; Hansen, W.; Buer, J.; Singer, B.B.; et al. CEACAM1 regulates CD8(+) T cell immunity and protects from severe pathology during Citrobacter rodentium induced colitis. Gut Microbes 2020, 11, 1790–1805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zebhauser, R.; Kammerer, R.; Eisenried, A.; McLellan, A.; Moore, T.; Zimmermann, W. Identification of a novel group of evolutionarily conserved members within the rapidly diverging murine Cea family. Genomics 2005, 86, 566–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chan, C.H.; Stanners, C.P. Novel mouse model for carcinoembryonic antigen-based therapy. Mol. Ther. 2004, 9, 775–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Carvalho, F.A.; Barnich, N.; Sivignon, A.; Darcha, C.; Chan, C.H.; Stanners, C.P.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A. Crohn’s disease adherent-invasive Escherichia coli colonize and induce strong gut inflammation in transgenic mice expressing human CEACAM. J. Exp. Med. 2009, 206, 2179–2189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Denizot, J.; Sivignon, A.; Barreau, F.; Darcha, C.; Chan, H.F.; Stanners, C.P.; Hofman, P.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A.; Barnich, N. Adherent-invasive Escherichia coli induce claudin-2 expression and barrier defect in CEABAC10 mice and Crohn’s disease patients. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2012, 18, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sintsova, A.; Guo, C.X.; Sarantis, H.; Mak, T.W.; Glogauer, M.; Gray-Owen, S.D. Bcl10 synergistically links CEACAM3 and TLR-dependent inflammatory signalling. Cell. Microbiol. 2018, 20, e12788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hebecker, B.; Vlaic, S.; Conrad, T.; Bauer, M.; Brunke, S.; Kapitan, M.; Linde, J.; Hube, B.; Jacobsen, I.D. Dual-species transcriptional profiling during systemic candidiasis reveals organ-specific host-pathogen interactions. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 36055, Erratum in Sci Rep. 2016, 6, 39423. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39423.. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Thomas, J.; Klebanov, A.; John, S.; Miller, L.S.; Vegesna, A.; Amdur, R.L.; Bhowmick, K.; Mishra, L. CEACAMS 1, 5, and 6 in disease and cancer: Interactions with pathogens. Genes Cancer 2023, 14, 12–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Burtin, P.; Quan, P.C.; Sabine, M.C. Nonspecific cross reacting antigen as a marker for human polymorphs, macrophages and monocytes. Nature 1975, 255, 714–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bordes, M.; Knobel, S.; Martin, F. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and related antigens in blood cells and hematopoietic tissues. Eur. J. Cancer (1965) 1975, 11, 783–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nap, M.; Hammarstrom, M.L.; Bormer, O.; Hammarstrom, S.; Wagener, C.; Handt, S.; Schreyer, M.; Mach, J.P.; Buchegger, F.; von Kleist, S.; et al. Specificity and affinity of monoclonal antibodies against carcinoembryonic antigen. Cancer Res. 1992, 52, 2329–2339. [Google Scholar]
  29. Jacobsen, I.D.; Luttich, A.; Kurzai, O.; Hube, B.; Brock, M. In vivo imaging of disseminated murine Candida albicans infection reveals unexpected host sites of fungal persistence during antifungal therapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 2785–2796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gerst, R.; Cseresnyes, Z.; Figge, M.T. JIPipe: Visual batch processing for ImageJ. Nat. Methods 2023, 20, 168–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Muller, M.M.; Lehmann, R.; Klassert, T.E.; Reifenstein, S.; Conrad, T.; Moore, C.; Kuhn, A.; Behnert, A.; Guthke, R.; Driesch, D.; et al. Global analysis of glycoproteins identifies markers of endotoxin tolerant monocytes and GPR84 as a modulator of TNFalpha expression. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cox, J.; Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 1367–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tyanova, S.; Temu, T.; Sinitcyn, P.; Carlson, A.; Hein, M.Y.; Geiger, T.; Mann, M.; Cox, J. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote)omics data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Benjamini, Y.; Drai, D.; Elmer, G.; Kafkafi, N.; Golani, I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav. Brain Res. 2001, 125, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Perez-Riverol, Y.; Bandla, C.; Kundu, D.J.; Kamatchinathan, S.; Bai, J.; Hewapathirana, S.; John, N.S.; Prakash, A.; Walzer, M.; Wang, S.; et al. The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D543–D553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Iba, T.; Umemura, Y.; Wada, H.; Levy, J.H. Roles of Coagulation Abnormalities and Microthrombosis in Sepsis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Arch. Med. Res. 2021, 52, 788–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lionakis, M.S.; Lim, J.K.; Lee, C.C.; Murphy, P.M. Organ-specific innate immune responses in a mouse model of invasive candidiasis. J. Innate Immun. 2011, 3, 180–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sonego, F.; Castanheira, F.V.; Ferreira, R.G.; Kanashiro, A.; Leite, C.A.; Nascimento, D.C.; Colon, D.F.; Borges Vde, F.; Alves-Filho, J.C.; Cunha, F.Q. Paradoxical Roles of the Neutrophil in Sepsis: Protective and Deleterious. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Metzemaekers, M.; Gouwy, M.; Proost, P. Neutrophil chemoattractant receptors in health and disease: Double-edged swords. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2020, 17, 433–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kuroki, M.; Yamanaka, T.; Matsuo, Y.; Oikawa, S.; Nakazato, H.; Matsuoka, Y. Immunochemical analysis of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-related antigens differentially localized in intracellular granules of human neutrophils. Immunol. Investig. 1995, 24, 829–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Skubitz, K.M.; Skubitz, A.P. Two new synthetic peptides from the N-domain of CEACAM1 (CD66a) stimulate neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells. Biopolymers 2011, 96, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Skubitz, K.M.; Skubitz, A.P. Interdependency of CEACAM-1, -3, -6, and -8 induced human neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells. J. Transl. Med. 2008, 6, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wu, X.; Hollingshead, N.; Roberto, J.; Knupp, A.; Kenerson, H.; Chen, A.; Strickland, I.; Horton, H.; Yeung, R.; Soysa, R.; et al. Human Liver Macrophage Subsets Defined by CD32. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 2108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Baharom, F.; Rankin, G.; Blomberg, A.; Smed-Sorensen, A. Human Lung Mononuclear Phagocytes in Health and Disease. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gray-Owen, S.D.; Blumberg, R.S. CEACAM1: Contact-dependent control of immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 433–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Behrens, I.K.; Busch, B.; Ishikawa-Ankerhold, H.; Palamides, P.; Shively, J.E.; Stanners, C.; Chan, C.; Leung, N.; Gray-Owen, S.; Haas, R. The HopQ-CEACAM Interaction Controls CagA Translocation, Phosphorylation, and Phagocytosis of Helicobacter pylori in Neutrophils. mBio 2020, 11, e03256-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Martinez-Medina, M.; Denizot, J.; Dreux, N.; Robin, F.; Billard, E.; Bonnet, R.; Darfeuille-Michaud, A.; Barnich, N. Western diet induces dysbiosis with increased E coli in CEABAC10 mice, alters host barrier function favouring AIEC colonisation. Gut 2014, 63, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Spellberg, B.; Ibrahim, A.S.; Edwards, J.E., Jr.; Filler, S.G. Mice with disseminated candidiasis die of progressive sepsis. J. Infect. Dis. 2005, 192, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lionakis, M.S.; Fischer, B.G.; Lim, J.K.; Swamydas, M.; Wan, W.; Richard Lee, C.C.; Cohen, J.I.; Scheinberg, P.; Gao, J.L.; Murphy, P.M. Chemokine receptor Ccr1 drives neutrophil-mediated kidney immunopathology and mortality in invasive candidiasis. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Lionakis, M.S.; Albert, N.D.; Swamydas, M.; Lee, C.R.; Loetscher, P.; Kontoyiannis, D.P. Pharmacological Blockade of the Chemokine Receptor CCR1 Protects Mice from Systemic Candidiasis of Hematogenous Origin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02365-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mantovani, A.; Cassatella, M.A.; Costantini, C.; Jaillon, S. Neutrophils in the activation and regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 519–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Papayannopoulos, V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, H.; Wang, Y.; Zippi, M.; Fiorino, S.; Hong, W. Oxidative stress, DAMPs, and immune cells in acute pancreatitis: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic prospects. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1608618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yano, J.; Peters, B.M.; Noverr, M.C.; Fidel, P.L., Jr. Novel Mechanism behind the Immunopathogenesis of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: “Neutrophil Anergy”. Infect. Immun. 2018, 86, e00684-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Souto, F.O.; Castanheira, F.V.S.; Trevelin, S.C.; Lima, B.H.F.; Cebinelli, G.C.M.; Turato, W.M.; Auxiliadora-Martins, M.; Basile-Filho, A.; Alves-Filho, J.C.; Cunha, F.Q. Liver X Receptor Activation Impairs Neutrophil Functions and Aggravates Sepsis. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 221, 1542–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wang, Y.Y.; Dahle, M.K.; Steffensen, K.R.; Reinholt, F.P.; Collins, J.L.; Thiemermann, C.; Aasen, A.O.; Gustafsson, J.A.; Wang, J.E. Liver X receptor agonist GW3965 dose-dependently regulates lps-mediated liver injury and modulates posttranscriptional TNF-alpha production and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in liver macrophages. Shock 2009, 32, 548–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Myhre, A.E.; Agren, J.; Dahle, M.K.; Tamburstuen, M.V.; Lyngstadaas, S.P.; Collins, A.J.; Foster, S.J.; Thiemermann, C.; Aasen, A.O.; Wang, J.E. Liver X receptor is a key regulator of cytokine release in human monocytes. Shock 2008, 29, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, B.; Wu, S.; Wang, T.; Ma, Z.; Liu, K. Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells-Mediated Protection Against Organ Dysfunction in Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Is Associated with Peripheral Immune Responses. J. Cell. Biochem. 2017, 118, 3184–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Smeekens, S.P.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Joosten, L.A.; Jacobs, L.; Jansen, T.; Williams, D.L.; van der Meer, J.W.; Kullberg, B.J.; Netea, M.G. The classical CD14(+)(+) CD16(−) monocytes, but not the patrolling CD14(+) CD16(+) monocytes, promote Th17 responses to Candida albicans. Eur. J. Immunol. 2011, 41, 2915–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ngo, L.Y.; Kasahara, S.; Kumasaka, D.K.; Knoblaugh, S.E.; Jhingran, A.; Hohl, T.M. Inflammatory monocytes mediate early and organ-specific innate defense during systemic candidiasis. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 209, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Langenhorst, D.; Furst, A.L.; Alberter, K.; Vilhena, C.; Dasari, P.; Daud, M.; Heilig, L.; Luther, C.H.; Dittrich, M.; Reiher, N.; et al. Soluble Enolase 1 of Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus Stimulates Human and Mouse B Cells and Monocytes. J. Immunol. 2023, 211, 804–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Ruiqi, W.; Xiaoli, F.; Leyu, Z.; Mengyi, S.; Qiaoyu, D.; Yanyi, Z.; Li, Y. Monocyte-derived macrophages contribute to the deterioration of immunological liver injury in mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2023, 124, 111036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Austermeier, S.; Kasper, L.; Westman, J.; Gresnigt, M.S. I want to break free—Macrophage strategies to recognize and kill Candida albicans, and fungal counter-strategies to escape. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Hashimoto, K.; Yuan, S.; Zhang, J. The gut-liver axis in sepsis: Interaction mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Crit. Care 2022, 26, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xu, S.; Shinohara, M.L. Tissue-Resident Macrophages in Fungal Infections. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lionakis, M.S.; Swamydas, M.; Fischer, B.G.; Plantinga, T.S.; Johnson, M.D.; Jaeger, M.; Green, N.M.; Masedunskas, A.; Weigert, R.; Mikelis, C.; et al. CX3CR1-dependent renal macrophage survival promotes Candida control and host survival. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 5035–5051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Strnad, P.; Tacke, F.; Koch, A.; Trautwein, C. Liver—Guardian, modifier and target of sepsis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 14, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Bauer, M.; Press, A.T.; Trauner, M. The liver in sepsis: Patterns of response and injury. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2013, 19, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. MacCallum, D.M.; Castillo, L.; Brown, A.J.; Gow, N.A.; Odds, F.C. Early-expressed chemokines predict kidney immunopathology in experimental disseminated Candida albicans infections. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bloos, F.; Reinhart, K. Rapid diagnosis of sepsis. Virulence 2014, 5, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Honda, S.; Sato, K.; Totsuka, N.; Fujiyama, S.; Fujimoto, M.; Miyake, K.; Nakahashi-Oda, C.; Tahara-Hanaoka, S.; Shibuya, K.; Shibuya, A. Marginal zone B cells exacerbate endotoxic shock via interleukin-6 secretion induced by Fcalpha/muR-coupled TLR4 signalling. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Drummond, R.A.; Lionakis, M.S. Organ-specific mechanisms linking innate and adaptive antifungal immunity. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 89, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Drummond, R.A. What fungal CNS infections can teach us about neuroimmunology and CNS-specific immunity. Semin. Immunol. 2023, 67, 101751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Drummond, R.A.; Swamydas, M.; Oikonomou, V.; Zhai, B.; Dambuza, I.M.; Schaefer, B.C.; Bohrer, A.C.; Mayer-Barber, K.D.; Lira, S.A.; Iwakura, Y.; et al. CARD9(+) microglia promote antifungal immunity via IL-1beta- and CXCL1-mediated neutrophil recruitment. Nat. Immunol. 2019, 20, 559–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gil, M.L.; Gozalbo, D. Role of Toll-like receptors in systemic Candida albicans infections. Front. Biosci. 2009, 14, 570–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Taylor, P.R.; Tsoni, S.V.; Willment, J.A.; Dennehy, K.M.; Rosas, M.; Findon, H.; Haynes, K.; Steele, C.; Botto, M.; Gordon, S.; et al. Dectin-1 is required for beta-glucan recognition and control of fungal infection. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Dubey, S.; Khan, J.; Alishlash, A.S.; Matalon, S. The Cell with Many Faces: Lung Macrophage Plasticity and Function in Response to Environmental and Pathogenic Insults. Physiol. Rev. 2026; in press. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Yao, T.; Maccioni, L.; Guan, Y.; Rodrigues, R.M.; Gao, B. Liver as a key organ for systemic antimicrobial defense. Hepatol. Commun. 2025, 9, e0814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Wasserman, S.; Hedges, L.V.; Olkin, I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. J. Educ. Stat. 1988, 13, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rueden, C.T.; Schindelin, J.; Hiner, M.C.; DeZonia, B.E.; Walter, A.E.; Arena, E.T.; Eliceiri, K.W. ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform. 2017, 18, 529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wilkinson, M.D.; Dumontier, M.; Aalbersberg, I.J.; Appleton, G.; Axton, M.; Baak, A.; Blomberg, N.; Boiten, J.W.; da Silva Santos, L.B.; Bourne, P.E.; et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 2016, 3, 160018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Otsu, N. A Threshold Selection Method from Gray-Level Histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1979, 9, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Badrinarayanan, V.; Kendall, A.; Cipolla, R. SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017, 39, 2481–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ronneberger, O.; Fischer, P.; Brox, T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI 2015; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  85. Legal-Ayala, H.A.; Facon, J. Image segmentation by learning approach. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, Edinburgh, UK, 3–6 August 2003. [Google Scholar]
  86. Ridler, T.W.; Calvard, S. Picture Thresholding Using an Iterative Selection Method. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1978, 8, 630–632. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. CEABAC10 mice are more susceptible to systemic C. albicans infection. (A) CEABAC10 mice (N = 8) and wild-type littermates (N = 8) were injected with 1 × 104 CFU C. albicans/g body weight and were analyzed for survival (one experiment). Note that significant results were also obtained after injection of 2.5 × 104 CFU/g body weight (Figure S1). (BF) CEABAC10 mice and wild-type littermates were either injected with PBS or infected with 1 × 104 CFU/g body weight and were sacrificed after 24 h or 72 h. Cytokine levels in peripheral blood were determined for IL-6 (B), TNFα (C) and GM-CSF (D) by multiplex assay (Luminex) or ELISA. Additional cytokines are shown in Figure S2. Numbers of neutrophils (E) and monocytes (F) in peripheral blood were analyzed in an automated hemocytometer (additional blood parameters shown in Figure S4). Statistics: (A) log rank test (Mantel–Cox); (BF) One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.001. Data are from one experiment (A) or combined from two independent experiments (BF). (BF) Data points with means and standard deviations.
Figure 1. CEABAC10 mice are more susceptible to systemic C. albicans infection. (A) CEABAC10 mice (N = 8) and wild-type littermates (N = 8) were injected with 1 × 104 CFU C. albicans/g body weight and were analyzed for survival (one experiment). Note that significant results were also obtained after injection of 2.5 × 104 CFU/g body weight (Figure S1). (BF) CEABAC10 mice and wild-type littermates were either injected with PBS or infected with 1 × 104 CFU/g body weight and were sacrificed after 24 h or 72 h. Cytokine levels in peripheral blood were determined for IL-6 (B), TNFα (C) and GM-CSF (D) by multiplex assay (Luminex) or ELISA. Additional cytokines are shown in Figure S2. Numbers of neutrophils (E) and monocytes (F) in peripheral blood were analyzed in an automated hemocytometer (additional blood parameters shown in Figure S4). Statistics: (A) log rank test (Mantel–Cox); (BF) One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.001. Data are from one experiment (A) or combined from two independent experiments (BF). (BF) Data points with means and standard deviations.
Cells 15 00707 g001
Figure 2. Enhanced acute phase response in CEABAC10 mice after 72 h systemic C. albicans infection. CEABAC10 mice and wild-type littermates were either injected with PBS or infected with 1 × 104 CFU/g body weight and were sacrificed after 24 h or 72 h (N = 6 per group, combined from two independent experiments). Glycoproteins were isolated from serum and analyzed via mass spectrometry. (A) Principal component analysis of identified proteins. Note that PBS-injected mice and mice at 24 h p.i. and 72 h p.i. separate (dashed red lines), but that CEABAC10 samples only separate from WT samples 72 h p.i. (dashed green oval). (B,C) Volcano plots of contrasts between WT samples 24 h p.i. (B) and 72 h p.i. (C) vs. WT PBS. Plots display the –log(p-value) versus the mean difference (log(2) fold-change). Red dots indicate statistically significant changes. All proteins detected and their corresponding values are listed in Table S1 (B) and Table S2 (C). (DF) Volcano plots of contrasts (1) between WT (PBS) and CEABAC10 (PBS) in D, (2) between WT (24 h CA) and CEABAC10 (24 h Ca) in E, and (3) between WT (72 h Ca) and CEABAC10 (72 h Ca) in F. Plots display the −log(p-value) versus the mean difference (log(2) fold-change). Red dots indicate statistically significant changes. All proteins detected and their corresponding values (F) are given in Table S3. Note that in (D,E) no significant alterations were observed. (GI) Pathway analysis of fold-changes in glycoprotein levels found in (B), (C), and (F), respectively. Asterisks (*) mark extracellular pathways. Bars are color coded for z-scores: red = positive z-score (activated); blue = negative z-score (inhibited); white = z-score equals 0; grey: no activity pattern available. Statistical analysis: MaxQuant, Perseus, and IPA software (settings: Section 2). All pathways and their values are listed in Tables S4–S6.
Figure 2. Enhanced acute phase response in CEABAC10 mice after 72 h systemic C. albicans infection. CEABAC10 mice and wild-type littermates were either injected with PBS or infected with 1 × 104 CFU/g body weight and were sacrificed after 24 h or 72 h (N = 6 per group, combined from two independent experiments). Glycoproteins were isolated from serum and analyzed via mass spectrometry. (A) Principal component analysis of identified proteins. Note that PBS-injected mice and mice at 24 h p.i. and 72 h p.i. separate (dashed red lines), but that CEABAC10 samples only separate from WT samples 72 h p.i. (dashed green oval). (B,C) Volcano plots of contrasts between WT samples 24 h p.i. (B) and 72 h p.i. (C) vs. WT PBS. Plots display the –log(p-value) versus the mean difference (log(2) fold-change). Red dots indicate statistically significant changes. All proteins detected and their corresponding values are listed in Table S1 (B) and Table S2 (C). (DF) Volcano plots of contrasts (1) between WT (PBS) and CEABAC10 (PBS) in D, (2) between WT (24 h CA) and CEABAC10 (24 h Ca) in E, and (3) between WT (72 h Ca) and CEABAC10 (72 h Ca) in F. Plots display the −log(p-value) versus the mean difference (log(2) fold-change). Red dots indicate statistically significant changes. All proteins detected and their corresponding values (F) are given in Table S3. Note that in (D,E) no significant alterations were observed. (GI) Pathway analysis of fold-changes in glycoprotein levels found in (B), (C), and (F), respectively. Asterisks (*) mark extracellular pathways. Bars are color coded for z-scores: red = positive z-score (activated); blue = negative z-score (inhibited); white = z-score equals 0; grey: no activity pattern available. Statistical analysis: MaxQuant, Perseus, and IPA software (settings: Section 2). All pathways and their values are listed in Tables S4–S6.
Cells 15 00707 g002
Figure 3. CEABAC10 mice show enhanced kidney inflammation during systemic C. albicans infection. CEABAC10 mice and wild-type littermates were either injected with PBS or infected with 1 × 104 CFU/g body weight and were sacrificed after 24 h or 72 h. (AD) Kidney sections were hematoxylin–eosin-stained (representative sections shown in Figure S1B–E) and analyzed. (AD). Sections were scored for the degree of renal inflammation (A) and analyzed for inflammatory foci (B,C) and total area of inflammation (D). (EG,I) Concentrations of IL-6 (E), IL-1β (F) and CCL2/MCP-1 (G) and CFUs (I) were determined in kidney homogenates by multiplex assay (Luminex)/ELISA and serial plating (additional cytokines shown in Figure S5). Note that non-infected kidneys did not show fungal growth (I). (H) % Ly6G+ neutrophils of CD45+ leukocytes isolated from kidneys analyzed by flow cytometry (additional immune cell populations shown in Figure S6, gating in Figure S7). (J,K) Representative Grocott silver-stained sections 72 h p.i and blow-ups of the indicated regions. (L) Grocott silver-stained sections were scored for the occurrence of hyphal growth. Note that non-infected kidneys did not show fungal growth. (MO) Immunohistochemical staining of consecutive sections of CEABAC10 kidneys 72 h p.i for CEACAM6 (M,N) and neutrophil elastase (O). Panels display representative images (N = 3). Note that only viable neutrophils are NE+, but that CEACAM6+ cells include viable and dead neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages and that CEACAM6+ cells (N) outnumber viable neutrophils (O) by ca. one or two orders of magnitude. Statistics: (A,K) Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01; (BH,L) One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001. (AG) Data points with means and standard deviations. (I,L) Data points with medians and means. Data are combined from two independent experiments.
Figure 3. CEABAC10 mice show enhanced kidney inflammation during systemic C. albicans infection. CEABAC10 mice and wild-type littermates were either injected with PBS or infected with 1 × 104 CFU/g body weight and were sacrificed after 24 h or 72 h. (AD) Kidney sections were hematoxylin–eosin-stained (representative sections shown in Figure S1B–E) and analyzed. (AD). Sections were scored for the degree of renal inflammation (A) and analyzed for inflammatory foci (B,C) and total area of inflammation (D). (EG,I) Concentrations of IL-6 (E), IL-1β (F) and CCL2/MCP-1 (G) and CFUs (I) were determined in kidney homogenates by multiplex assay (Luminex)/ELISA and serial plating (additional cytokines shown in Figure S5). Note that non-infected kidneys did not show fungal growth (I). (H) % Ly6G+ neutrophils of CD45+ leukocytes isolated from kidneys analyzed by flow cytometry (additional immune cell populations shown in Figure S6, gating in Figure S7). (J,K) Representative Grocott silver-stained sections 72 h p.i and blow-ups of the indicated regions. (L) Grocott silver-stained sections were scored for the occurrence of hyphal growth. Note that non-infected kidneys did not show fungal growth. (MO) Immunohistochemical staining of consecutive sections of CEABAC10 kidneys 72 h p.i for CEACAM6 (M,N) and neutrophil elastase (O). Panels display representative images (N = 3). Note that only viable neutrophils are NE+, but that CEACAM6+ cells include viable and dead neutrophils, monocytes, and macrophages and that CEACAM6+ cells (N) outnumber viable neutrophils (O) by ca. one or two orders of magnitude. Statistics: (A,K) Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01; (BH,L) One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001. (AG) Data points with means and standard deviations. (I,L) Data points with medians and means. Data are combined from two independent experiments.
Cells 15 00707 g003
Figure 4. WT and CEABAC10 bone marrow-derived neutrophils display similar reactions to C. albicans. (AE) Degranulation and CEACAM surface expression. WT and CEABAC10 BMNs were either left untreated or stimulated with C. albicans for 1 h, stained for CD11b and either CEACAM3 (A,C) or CEACAM6 (B,D), and analyzed by flow cytometry (gating shown in Figure S8). (A,B) Representative results, grey line: isotype control, black lines: CEACAM3 and CEACAM6. (CE) Log data of the relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) with means and SDs. (F) Spontaneous and C. albicans-induced cell death after 2 h. Viability was assessed by exclusion of PI and annexin V staining via flow cytometry (% viable BMNs with means and SDs). (G) C. albicans killing efficiency after 30 min analyzed by XTT assay (% surviving CFUs from the input with means and SDs). (H) C. albicans binding/phagocytosis (20 min, FITC-labeled yeast cells at MOI 10, stained for extracellular C. albicans via specific antibody) was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy for cells with no contact with C. albicans (no); C. albicans bound exclusively extracellularly (ext.); and phagocytosed, intracellular C. albicans (int.) (% BMNs with means and SDs). For each experiment, at least 100 BMNs were counted per group. (I) Spontaneous and C. albicans-induced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) after 20 min measured via DHR assay by flow cytometry (log data of RFI with means and SDs). (J,K) Spontaneous and C. albicans-induced CXCL1/KC (J) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) (K) release in cell culture supernatants after 24 h with means and SDs. Statistics: (C,D,G) unpaired, two-sided Student’s t-test; (E,F,HK) One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; log data were used for statistical analysis of (CE,I). (CK) Data points with means and standard deviations.
Figure 4. WT and CEABAC10 bone marrow-derived neutrophils display similar reactions to C. albicans. (AE) Degranulation and CEACAM surface expression. WT and CEABAC10 BMNs were either left untreated or stimulated with C. albicans for 1 h, stained for CD11b and either CEACAM3 (A,C) or CEACAM6 (B,D), and analyzed by flow cytometry (gating shown in Figure S8). (A,B) Representative results, grey line: isotype control, black lines: CEACAM3 and CEACAM6. (CE) Log data of the relative fluorescence intensity (RFI) with means and SDs. (F) Spontaneous and C. albicans-induced cell death after 2 h. Viability was assessed by exclusion of PI and annexin V staining via flow cytometry (% viable BMNs with means and SDs). (G) C. albicans killing efficiency after 30 min analyzed by XTT assay (% surviving CFUs from the input with means and SDs). (H) C. albicans binding/phagocytosis (20 min, FITC-labeled yeast cells at MOI 10, stained for extracellular C. albicans via specific antibody) was analyzed by fluorescence microscopy for cells with no contact with C. albicans (no); C. albicans bound exclusively extracellularly (ext.); and phagocytosed, intracellular C. albicans (int.) (% BMNs with means and SDs). For each experiment, at least 100 BMNs were counted per group. (I) Spontaneous and C. albicans-induced production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) after 20 min measured via DHR assay by flow cytometry (log data of RFI with means and SDs). (J,K) Spontaneous and C. albicans-induced CXCL1/KC (J) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) (K) release in cell culture supernatants after 24 h with means and SDs. Statistics: (C,D,G) unpaired, two-sided Student’s t-test; (E,F,HK) One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; log data were used for statistical analysis of (CE,I). (CK) Data points with means and standard deviations.
Cells 15 00707 g004
Figure 5. CEABAC10 livers display enhanced inflammation, acute coagulation necroses with immune cell infiltration, and multifocal hemorrhage during systemic C. albicans infection. CEABAC10 mice and wild-type littermates were either injected with PBS or infected with 1 × 104 CFU/g body weight and were sacrificed after 24 h or 72 h. (AC) Occurrence of macroscopic pathologic liver abnormalities (white areas) observed during necropsy 72 h p.i. (18 CEA, 14 WT). (A,B) Representative images. (C) Livers without macroscopic abnormalities (open bars) and livers displaying white areas 72 h p.i. (filled bars). (DH) Liver sections were hematoxylin–eosin-stained and analyzed. (DF) Representative CEABAC10 liver section 72 h p.i. showing acute coagulation necroses with immune cell infiltration and multifocal hemorrhage. (G,H) Sections were scored for the degree of acute coagulation necroses (G) and for the grade of acute purulent necrotizing hepatitis (H). (I,J) % Ly6G+ neutrophils (I) and F4/80+ macrophages (J) of CD45+ leukocytes isolated from livers (additional immune cell populations shown in Figure S10, gating in Figure S11). (KM) Concentrations of IL-6 (K), CCL2/MCP-1 (L) and CCL3/MIP-1alpha (M) were determined in liver homogenates (additional cytokines shown in Figure S9). (N) CFUs in liver homogenates. (OQ) Immunohistochemical staining of consecutive CEABAC10 liver sections 72 h p.i. for CEACAM6 (O,P) or neutrophil elastase (NE) (Q) (representative sections, N = 3). Note that only viable neutrophils are NE+, but that CEACAM6+ cells include viable and dead neutrophils and macrophages/monocytes and that CEACAM6+ cells (P) outnumber viable neutrophils (Q) by one or two orders of magnitude. (R) Spleen sections were hematoxylin–eosin-stained and scored for splenitis. (S) CFUs were determined in spleen homogenates. Note that livers and spleens from uninfected animals (8 WT and 8 CEABAC10 for PBS) did not display any fungal growth and that none of the infected liver and spleen samples displayed any hyphal growth. Data are combined from two (GN,R,S) or four (C) independent experiments. Statistics: (C) Fisher’s Exact Test, two-sided $$$$ p < 0.001; (G,H,R) Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test: # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01; (IN,S) One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005. For (L,S), log data were used for statistical analysis. (GN,R,S) Data points with means and standard deviations.
Figure 5. CEABAC10 livers display enhanced inflammation, acute coagulation necroses with immune cell infiltration, and multifocal hemorrhage during systemic C. albicans infection. CEABAC10 mice and wild-type littermates were either injected with PBS or infected with 1 × 104 CFU/g body weight and were sacrificed after 24 h or 72 h. (AC) Occurrence of macroscopic pathologic liver abnormalities (white areas) observed during necropsy 72 h p.i. (18 CEA, 14 WT). (A,B) Representative images. (C) Livers without macroscopic abnormalities (open bars) and livers displaying white areas 72 h p.i. (filled bars). (DH) Liver sections were hematoxylin–eosin-stained and analyzed. (DF) Representative CEABAC10 liver section 72 h p.i. showing acute coagulation necroses with immune cell infiltration and multifocal hemorrhage. (G,H) Sections were scored for the degree of acute coagulation necroses (G) and for the grade of acute purulent necrotizing hepatitis (H). (I,J) % Ly6G+ neutrophils (I) and F4/80+ macrophages (J) of CD45+ leukocytes isolated from livers (additional immune cell populations shown in Figure S10, gating in Figure S11). (KM) Concentrations of IL-6 (K), CCL2/MCP-1 (L) and CCL3/MIP-1alpha (M) were determined in liver homogenates (additional cytokines shown in Figure S9). (N) CFUs in liver homogenates. (OQ) Immunohistochemical staining of consecutive CEABAC10 liver sections 72 h p.i. for CEACAM6 (O,P) or neutrophil elastase (NE) (Q) (representative sections, N = 3). Note that only viable neutrophils are NE+, but that CEACAM6+ cells include viable and dead neutrophils and macrophages/monocytes and that CEACAM6+ cells (P) outnumber viable neutrophils (Q) by one or two orders of magnitude. (R) Spleen sections were hematoxylin–eosin-stained and scored for splenitis. (S) CFUs were determined in spleen homogenates. Note that livers and spleens from uninfected animals (8 WT and 8 CEABAC10 for PBS) did not display any fungal growth and that none of the infected liver and spleen samples displayed any hyphal growth. Data are combined from two (GN,R,S) or four (C) independent experiments. Statistics: (C) Fisher’s Exact Test, two-sided $$$$ p < 0.001; (G,H,R) Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s Multiple Comparison Test: # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01; (IN,S) One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005. For (L,S), log data were used for statistical analysis. (GN,R,S) Data points with means and standard deviations.
Cells 15 00707 g005
Figure 6. Increased numbers of CEACAM6+ myeloid cells in organs of CEABAC10 mice during systemic C. albicans infection and loss of CEACAM6+ liver macrophages. CEABAC10 mice were either injected with PBS or infected with 1 × 104 CFU/g body weight and were sacrificed after 24 h or 72 h. Immune cells were isolated from kidneys (AC), liver (DF), and spleen (GI) and stained with viability dye/CD45/CD11b/Ly6G and viability dye/CD45/F4/80/Ly6C/CD11c. Neutrophils (A,D,G), monocytes (B,E,H), and macrophages (C,F,I) were analyzed for their percentage of human CEACAM6-positive cells (gating: see Figure S15). Graphs show the percentages of CEACAM6-positive cells for the respective cell types with means and standard deviations. Data are from one experiment. Statistics: One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.
Figure 6. Increased numbers of CEACAM6+ myeloid cells in organs of CEABAC10 mice during systemic C. albicans infection and loss of CEACAM6+ liver macrophages. CEABAC10 mice were either injected with PBS or infected with 1 × 104 CFU/g body weight and were sacrificed after 24 h or 72 h. Immune cells were isolated from kidneys (AC), liver (DF), and spleen (GI) and stained with viability dye/CD45/CD11b/Ly6G and viability dye/CD45/F4/80/Ly6C/CD11c. Neutrophils (A,D,G), monocytes (B,E,H), and macrophages (C,F,I) were analyzed for their percentage of human CEACAM6-positive cells (gating: see Figure S15). Graphs show the percentages of CEACAM6-positive cells for the respective cell types with means and standard deviations. Data are from one experiment. Statistics: One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.
Cells 15 00707 g006
Figure 7. Enhanced phagocytosis but unaltered C. albicans-induced cell death of CEACAM6+ bone marrow-derived macrophages. (A,B) Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from CEABAC10 mice were analyzed via flow cytometry. Single viable cells were gated for F4/80+/CD11b+ macrophages (gray oval, A) and analyzed for their CEACAM6 expression (gray rectangle, B); density plot, for complete gating, see Figure S16. Graphs are representative of three independent experiments (mean and standard deviation: 88.9% ± 5.1% CEACAM6+ BMDMs). (C) WT and CEABAC10 BMDMs were incubated with FITC-labeled C. albicans at MOI 5 for 20 min, fixed, and stained for extracellular C. albicans. Images were analyzed for C. albicans bound externally to BMDMs and phagocytosed/intracellular C. albicans. The graph shows the phagocytosis efficiency in %: intracellular C. albicans/(externally bound + intracellular C. albicans) × 100. N = 3; at least 100 cells were analyzed per sample. (D) WT and CEABAC10 BMDMs were either left unstimulated or incubated with C. albicans at MOI 1 for 24 h and analyzed for the percentage of dead cells by Sytox green staining; at least 100 cells were analyzed per sample. (E,F) WT and CEABAC10 BMDMs were either left unstimulated or incubated with C. albicans at MOI 1 for 24 h. Concentrations of IL-1β (E), IL-6 (F), and TNFα (G) were determined in cell culture supernatants via ELISA. Graphs show data points with means and SDs. Statistics: (C) unpaired, two-sided Student’s t-test; (DG) One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test. (CG) Data points with means and standard deviations.
Figure 7. Enhanced phagocytosis but unaltered C. albicans-induced cell death of CEACAM6+ bone marrow-derived macrophages. (A,B) Bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from CEABAC10 mice were analyzed via flow cytometry. Single viable cells were gated for F4/80+/CD11b+ macrophages (gray oval, A) and analyzed for their CEACAM6 expression (gray rectangle, B); density plot, for complete gating, see Figure S16. Graphs are representative of three independent experiments (mean and standard deviation: 88.9% ± 5.1% CEACAM6+ BMDMs). (C) WT and CEABAC10 BMDMs were incubated with FITC-labeled C. albicans at MOI 5 for 20 min, fixed, and stained for extracellular C. albicans. Images were analyzed for C. albicans bound externally to BMDMs and phagocytosed/intracellular C. albicans. The graph shows the phagocytosis efficiency in %: intracellular C. albicans/(externally bound + intracellular C. albicans) × 100. N = 3; at least 100 cells were analyzed per sample. (D) WT and CEABAC10 BMDMs were either left unstimulated or incubated with C. albicans at MOI 1 for 24 h and analyzed for the percentage of dead cells by Sytox green staining; at least 100 cells were analyzed per sample. (E,F) WT and CEABAC10 BMDMs were either left unstimulated or incubated with C. albicans at MOI 1 for 24 h. Concentrations of IL-1β (E), IL-6 (F), and TNFα (G) were determined in cell culture supernatants via ELISA. Graphs show data points with means and SDs. Statistics: (C) unpaired, two-sided Student’s t-test; (DG) One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test. (CG) Data points with means and standard deviations.
Cells 15 00707 g007
Figure 8. Bone marrow-derived CEACAM6+ classical monocytes release enhanced amounts of IL-6 and CCL2 in response to C. albicans infection. (AD) Bone marrow-derived monocytes (BMMs) from CEABAC10 mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. Single viable BMMs were gated into CD11c+/CD62L non-classical monocytes, CD11c+/CD62L+ intermediate monocytes, and CD11c/CD62L+ classical monocytes (A) and analyzed for their CEACAM6 and CD11b expression (BD). For complete gating, see Figure S16. Graphs are representative of three independent experiments (means and standard deviations: CEACAM6+ non-classical monocytes = 1.6% ± 0.4%; CEACAM6+ intermediate monocytes = 36.9% ± 3.8%; CEACAM6+ classical monocytes = 83.4% ± 6.4%). (EH) WT and CEABAC10 BMM were either left unstimulated or incubated with C. albicans at MOI 1 for 24 h. Concentrations of CCL2/MCP-1 (E), IL-6 (F), TNFα (G), and IL-1β (H) were determined in cell culture supernatants. Graphs show data points with means and standard deviations. Statistics: One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test, ** p < 0.01.
Figure 8. Bone marrow-derived CEACAM6+ classical monocytes release enhanced amounts of IL-6 and CCL2 in response to C. albicans infection. (AD) Bone marrow-derived monocytes (BMMs) from CEABAC10 mice were analyzed by flow cytometry. Single viable BMMs were gated into CD11c+/CD62L non-classical monocytes, CD11c+/CD62L+ intermediate monocytes, and CD11c/CD62L+ classical monocytes (A) and analyzed for their CEACAM6 and CD11b expression (BD). For complete gating, see Figure S16. Graphs are representative of three independent experiments (means and standard deviations: CEACAM6+ non-classical monocytes = 1.6% ± 0.4%; CEACAM6+ intermediate monocytes = 36.9% ± 3.8%; CEACAM6+ classical monocytes = 83.4% ± 6.4%). (EH) WT and CEABAC10 BMM were either left unstimulated or incubated with C. albicans at MOI 1 for 24 h. Concentrations of CCL2/MCP-1 (E), IL-6 (F), TNFα (G), and IL-1β (H) were determined in cell culture supernatants. Graphs show data points with means and standard deviations. Statistics: One-Way ANOVA and Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Test, ** p < 0.01.
Cells 15 00707 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klaile, E.; Müller, M.M.; Sonnberger, J.; Bothe, A.-K.; Brehme, S.; Ehrenpfordt, J.; Klassert, T.E.; Kuhn, S.; Dietert, K.; Kershaw, O.; et al. Expression of Human CEACAM Receptors Promotes Inflammation and Organ Damage During Systemic Candida albicans Infection in Mice. Cells 2026, 15, 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15080707

AMA Style

Klaile E, Müller MM, Sonnberger J, Bothe A-K, Brehme S, Ehrenpfordt J, Klassert TE, Kuhn S, Dietert K, Kershaw O, et al. Expression of Human CEACAM Receptors Promotes Inflammation and Organ Damage During Systemic Candida albicans Infection in Mice. Cells. 2026; 15(8):707. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15080707

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klaile, Esther, Mario Marco Müller, Johannes Sonnberger, Anne-Katrin Bothe, Saskia Brehme, Juliet Ehrenpfordt, Tilman Eike Klassert, Sabina Kuhn, Kristina Dietert, Olivia Kershaw, and et al. 2026. "Expression of Human CEACAM Receptors Promotes Inflammation and Organ Damage During Systemic Candida albicans Infection in Mice" Cells 15, no. 8: 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15080707

APA Style

Klaile, E., Müller, M. M., Sonnberger, J., Bothe, A.-K., Brehme, S., Ehrenpfordt, J., Klassert, T. E., Kuhn, S., Dietert, K., Kershaw, O., Praetorius, J.-P., Figge, M. T., Bauer, T., Gebhardt, A., Mall, G., Jacobsen, I. D., & Slevogt, H. (2026). Expression of Human CEACAM Receptors Promotes Inflammation and Organ Damage During Systemic Candida albicans Infection in Mice. Cells, 15(8), 707. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15080707

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop