Next Article in Journal
Structure-Based Virtual Screening and Mechanistic Characterization of Methotrexate and Selinexor as Potent Anti-Melanogenic Agents via Multi-Pathway Suppression of MITF
Previous Article in Journal
A Minimally Invasive, Extracellular Vesicle-Based Approach for Monitoring Measurable Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Proof-of-Concept Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Cell Line-Dependent Effects of Spheroid Formation Method on Drug Response in Melanoma Models

by
Akvilė Žilytė
1 and
Vilma Petrikaitė
1,2,*
1
Laboratory of Drug Targets Histopathology, Institute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Sukilėlių Av. 13, LT-50162 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio 7, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2026, 15(12), 1069; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15121069
Submission received: 11 May 2026 / Revised: 4 June 2026 / Accepted: 10 June 2026 / Published: 11 June 2026

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the impact of different in vitro 3D culture modelling methods on the activity of doxorubicin (DOX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in human melanoma spheroids. Human melanoma A375 and IGR39 spheroids were generated using the hanging drop and non-adhesive surface methods. Spheroid growth dynamics were assessed by measuring changes in spheroid diameter. To compare the effects of anticancer drugs in spheroids of different sizes, spheroids of approximately 200 and 400 µm were formed. Drug activity was evaluated based on spheroid growth and cell viability using the MTT assay. A375 spheroids formed using the non-adhesive surface method were more sensitive to DOX than spheroids formed using the hanging drop method. In smaller A375 spheroids, 10 µM 5-FU reduced cell viability more effectively in spheroids formed using the hanging drop method. In contrast, IGR39 spheroids formed by the hanging drop method were more resistant than those formed on a non-adhesive surface. However, in IGR39 spheroids, the effects of DOX and 5-FU on growth and viability did not significantly differ between formation methods. In conclusion, A375 spheroid growth was not significantly influenced by the formation method, whereas IGR39 spheroid growth depended on the method used. A375 spheroids formed on non-adhesive surfaces were more sensitive to DOX, whereas 5-FU activity depended on drug concentration and spheroid size. In IGR39 spheroids, the effects of DOX and 5-FU on growth and viability were largely independent of the spheroid formation method.
Keywords: melanoma; cell spheroids; hanging drop; non-adhesive surface; doxorubicin; 5-fluorouracil; cell viability melanoma; cell spheroids; hanging drop; non-adhesive surface; doxorubicin; 5-fluorouracil; cell viability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Žilytė, A.; Petrikaitė, V. Cell Line-Dependent Effects of Spheroid Formation Method on Drug Response in Melanoma Models. Cells 2026, 15, 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15121069

AMA Style

Žilytė A, Petrikaitė V. Cell Line-Dependent Effects of Spheroid Formation Method on Drug Response in Melanoma Models. Cells. 2026; 15(12):1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15121069

Chicago/Turabian Style

Žilytė, Akvilė, and Vilma Petrikaitė. 2026. "Cell Line-Dependent Effects of Spheroid Formation Method on Drug Response in Melanoma Models" Cells 15, no. 12: 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15121069

APA Style

Žilytė, A., & Petrikaitė, V. (2026). Cell Line-Dependent Effects of Spheroid Formation Method on Drug Response in Melanoma Models. Cells, 15(12), 1069. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells15121069

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop