Next Article in Journal
Toll-Like Receptor Signaling in the Establishment and Function of the Immune System
Next Article in Special Issue
MicroRNAs in Prion Diseases—From Molecular Mechanisms to Insights in Translational Medicine
Previous Article in Journal
Multifactorial Pathogenic Processes of Retinal Ganglion Cell Degeneration in Glaucoma towards Multi-Target Strategies for Broader Treatment Effects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Small Activating RNAs: Towards the Development of New Therapeutic Agents and Clinical Treatments
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

An Insight into the microRNAs Associated with Arteriovenous and Cavernous Malformations of the Brain

Cells 2021, 10(6), 1373; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10061373
by Ioan Alexandru Florian 1,2,*,†, Andrei Buruiana 3,†, Teodora Larisa Timis 4,†, Sergiu Susman 5,†, Ioan Stefan Florian 1,2, Adrian Balasa 6,7 and Ioana Berindan-Neagoe 8
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cells 2021, 10(6), 1373; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10061373
Submission received: 7 May 2021 / Revised: 29 May 2021 / Accepted: 31 May 2021 / Published: 2 June 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors searched some databases about the link of some microRNAs and Arterio-venous or Cavernous Malformations and summarized their findings in this manuscript. I am sure the authors put a lot of time and efforts in literature search and manuscript preparation. Even if most of the evidence are vague and the association between the microRNA expression and the malformation development is quite weak. The information is still useful for researchers in this field. One suggestion is that the authors should concentrate on the Arterio-venous and Cavernous Malformations. The discussion about the link of the microRNAs with other conditions should be limited to the extent that is relevant to the main diseases.

Author Response

Cover letter for: cells-1233098

An Insight into the microRNAs Associated with Arterio-venous and Cavernous Malformations of the Brain

Esteemed editor and reviewers,

We, the authors, would like to express our gratitude for your kind remarks and suggestions for our manuscript. We hope that the changes made are to your expectations. If, however, you would like further changes, we are more than happy to comply. As instructed by the editor, we have also provided a Graphical abstract, included in the manuscript, which we hope adequately conveys the message of our manuscript. Below, you will find a point-by-point response to each suggestion, according to the reviewer.

Reviewer 1

The authors searched some databases about the link of some microRNAs and Arterio-venous or Cavernous Malformations and summarized their findings in this manuscript. I am sure the authors put a lot of time and efforts in literature search and manuscript preparation. Even if most of the evidence are vague and the association between the microRNA expression and the malformation development is quite weak. The information is still useful for researchers in this field. One suggestion is that the authors should concentrate on the Arterio-venous and Cavernous Malformations. The discussion about the link of the microRNAs with other conditions should be limited to the extent that is relevant to the main diseases.

Response: We are grateful for your remarks and suggestion. The reason we have also detailed the findings of miRNAs in other cerebral pathologies is to provide a basis for potential future research linking these other diseases to BAVMs and CCMs, for a better understanding of these malformations. Therefore, we feel that by reducing some of the discussion regarding the roles these miRNAs play in pathologies distinct to vascular malformations may affect the significance of our review. We have, however, included a paragraph on the limitations you kindly pointed out, explaining that the evidence is currently vague and the associations are weak. We also explained a possible reason why these miRNAs have not been as extensively researched in BAVMs and CCMs, it being that these are already curable lesions that may not be as enticing to research as other incurable and malignant diseases. We hope that you understand our perspective and agree with our modifications. If, however, you prefer the discussion to be slightly abbreviated and more focused on these two lesions, we would be happy to oblige and would do our best in that regard.

Reviewer 2:

The authors proposed an outstanding review dealing with miRNA and brain vasculature malformations. The text is easily readable and the quality of the figures perfectly illustrates the review. No modifications needed, this review is acceptable in the present form.

Response: We sincerely thank you for your kind remarks. We hope that you will agree with the modifications made for the revision of our manuscript.

Again, we would like to thank the editor and the reviewers for their patience and suggestions.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors proposed an outstanding review dealing with miRNA and brain vasculature malformations. The text is easily readable and the quality of the figures perfectly illustrates the review. No modifications needed, this review is acceptable in the present form.

Author Response

Cover letter for: cells-1233098

An Insight into the microRNAs Associated with Arterio-venous and Cavernous Malformations of the Brain

Esteemed editor and reviewers,

We, the authors, would like to express our gratitude for your kind remarks and suggestions for our manuscript. We hope that the changes made are to your expectations. If, however, you would like further changes, we are more than happy to comply. As instructed by the editor, we have also provided a Graphical abstract, included in the manuscript, which we hope adequately conveys the message of our manuscript. Below, you will find a point-by-point response to each suggestion, according to the reviewer.

Reviewer 1

The authors searched some databases about the link of some microRNAs and Arterio-venous or Cavernous Malformations and summarized their findings in this manuscript. I am sure the authors put a lot of time and efforts in literature search and manuscript preparation. Even if most of the evidence are vague and the association between the microRNA expression and the malformation development is quite weak. The information is still useful for researchers in this field. One suggestion is that the authors should concentrate on the Arterio-venous and Cavernous Malformations. The discussion about the link of the microRNAs with other conditions should be limited to the extent that is relevant to the main diseases.

Response: We are grateful for your remarks and suggestion. The reason we have also detailed the findings of miRNAs in other cerebral pathologies is to provide a basis for potential future research linking these other diseases to BAVMs and CCMs, for a better understanding of these malformations. Therefore, we feel that by reducing some of the discussion regarding the roles these miRNAs play in pathologies distinct to vascular malformations may affect the significance of our review. We have, however, included a paragraph on the limitations you kindly pointed out, explaining that the evidence is currently vague and the associations are weak. We also explained a possible reason why these miRNAs have not been as extensively researched in BAVMs and CCMs, it being that these are already curable lesions that may not be as enticing to research as other incurable and malignant diseases. We hope that you understand our perspective and agree with our modifications. If, however, you prefer the discussion to be slightly abbreviated and more focused on these two lesions, we would be happy to oblige and would do our best in that regard.

Reviewer 2:

The authors proposed an outstanding review dealing with miRNA and brain vasculature malformations. The text is easily readable and the quality of the figures perfectly illustrates the review. No modifications needed, this review is acceptable in the present form.

Response: We sincerely thank you for your kind remarks. We hope that you will agree with the modifications made for the revision of our manuscript.

Again, we would like to thank the editor and the reviewers for their patience and suggestions.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop