Next Article in Journal
Application of BLUP-GGE Biplot in Mega-Environment Analysis and Test Location Evaluation of Wheat Regional Trials in the Huanghuai Winter Wheat Region in China
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Wide–Narrow Row Spacing and Planting Density on Canopy Structure, Photosynthetic Performance, and Yield of Brewing Sorghum in Slightly Saline–Alkali Soils
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Quantifying Socioeconomic Potential Losses Under Water Scarcity Using the WIOLP Model

1
Department of Fire Safety, Dongshin University, Naju 58245, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Aeronautics and Civil Engineering, Hanseo University, Seosan 31962, Republic of Korea
3
Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Hydro Science and Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Goyang 10223, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2026, 16(8), 799; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16080799
Submission received: 10 February 2026 / Revised: 1 April 2026 / Accepted: 8 April 2026 / Published: 13 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Water Use and Irrigation)

Abstract

The increasing frequency and severity of extreme droughts caused by climate change has emerged as a key risk factor exerting complex effects on the overall national economy through a structure of interconnected industries. The Water Input–Output Linear Programming (WIOLP) model was applied to data from 2015 to 2018 to quantitatively assess the effects of drought-induced water use constraints on production and socioeconomic potential losses. By modeling scenarios in which water use decreased by 10% from 100%, changes in the gross output, the value added, the socioeconomic potential loss, and the shadow price by industry were evaluated. Results showed that socioeconomic potential losses increased nonlinearly, with maximum potential losses of 311,118 billion Korean Won (KRW) in 2015 and 355,260 billion KRW in 2018. The shadow price rose from 7311 to 73,186 KRW/m3 in 2015 and from 3291 to 89,586 KRW/m3 in 2018, confirming that the marginal productivity of water increased exponentially under stricter constraints. Industry-level analysis revealed the largest losses in high water use industries (e.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries, chemicals, and non-metals), whereas electricity, electronics, and machinery sectors maintained relatively stable production. This study demonstrates that the WIOLP model can empirically analyze nonlinear economic ripple effects under resource constraints, overcoming limitations of conventional input–output and computable general equilibrium models.
Keywords: water input–output linear programming; drought socioeconomic potential losses; water scarcity; water shadow pricing; drought impact assessment; drought resilience strategy water input–output linear programming; drought socioeconomic potential losses; water scarcity; water shadow pricing; drought impact assessment; drought resilience strategy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, Y.; Park, M.; Kim, S.; Jang, C. Quantifying Socioeconomic Potential Losses Under Water Scarcity Using the WIOLP Model. Agronomy 2026, 16, 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16080799

AMA Style

Song Y, Park M, Kim S, Jang C. Quantifying Socioeconomic Potential Losses Under Water Scarcity Using the WIOLP Model. Agronomy. 2026; 16(8):799. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16080799

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Youngseok, Moojong Park, Sangdan Kim, and Cheolhee Jang. 2026. "Quantifying Socioeconomic Potential Losses Under Water Scarcity Using the WIOLP Model" Agronomy 16, no. 8: 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16080799

APA Style

Song, Y., Park, M., Kim, S., & Jang, C. (2026). Quantifying Socioeconomic Potential Losses Under Water Scarcity Using the WIOLP Model. Agronomy, 16(8), 799. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16080799

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop