Next Article in Journal
Mechanistic Shifts in Organic Carbon Stabilization in a Black Soil Driven by Nitrogen Fertilization
Previous Article in Journal
The Regulatory Role of Biochar in the Fate of Potassium Fertilizer and Potassium Uptake in Soybean Grown in Diverse Soils
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Foliar Application of Copper, Manganese, Molybdenum, and Zinc on the Chemical Composition and Malting Quality of Barley Cultivars
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Comparative Evaluation of Foliar-Applied Selenium Biofortification in Different Rice Genotypes

by
Pitchaporn Inton
1,
Jeeraporn Veeradittakit
1 and
Chanakan Prom-u-thai
1,2,*
1
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
2
Lanna Rice Research Center, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2026, 16(2), 269; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16020269 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 26 December 2025 / Revised: 17 January 2026 / Accepted: 20 January 2026 / Published: 22 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrient Enrichment and Crop Quality in Sustainable Agriculture)

Abstract

Selenium (Se) biofortification in rice presents a promising strategy to address Se deficiency in populations relying on rice as a staple food. This study evaluated the impact of foliar Se application on Se accumulation, its distribution in unpolished and polished rice grains, grain yield, and antioxidant capacity across 21 rice genotypes. Foliar Se application significantly improved grain yield, with increases ranging from 5.7 to 67.5% compared to non-foliar Se application. Se concentrations in both unpolished and polished grains were notably enhanced by foliar application, reaching 41.1–543.9 µg kg−1, whereas non-foliar treatments resulted in much lower concentrations (0–30.5 µg kg−1). Foliar Se also altered Se partitioning, decreasing Se retention in unpolished grains (from 9.8–100% under non-foliar application to 19.7–66.1% with foliar Se application) and increasing its proportion in polished rice. Se loss during polishing was genotype-dependent and generally reduced by foliar Se application (9.4–72.3%). Antioxidant capacity was highest in unpolished rice and varied among genotypes, increasing further with foliar Se. A positive correlation between grain antioxidant capacity and Se concentration was observed in unpolished, but not polished rice. Overall, these findings demonstrate the effectiveness of foliar Se biofortification in enhancing Se content and antioxidant properties, emphasizing the importance of genotype selection such as RD16, RD79, KDML105, K2, KJ CMU 107, and HMD to maximize biofortification benefits.
Keywords: biofortification; selenium enriched rice; high nutrition rice; antioxidant capacity; special quality rice biofortification; selenium enriched rice; high nutrition rice; antioxidant capacity; special quality rice

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Inton, P.; Veeradittakit, J.; Prom-u-thai, C. Comparative Evaluation of Foliar-Applied Selenium Biofortification in Different Rice Genotypes. Agronomy 2026, 16, 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16020269

AMA Style

Inton P, Veeradittakit J, Prom-u-thai C. Comparative Evaluation of Foliar-Applied Selenium Biofortification in Different Rice Genotypes. Agronomy. 2026; 16(2):269. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16020269

Chicago/Turabian Style

Inton, Pitchaporn, Jeeraporn Veeradittakit, and Chanakan Prom-u-thai. 2026. "Comparative Evaluation of Foliar-Applied Selenium Biofortification in Different Rice Genotypes" Agronomy 16, no. 2: 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16020269

APA Style

Inton, P., Veeradittakit, J., & Prom-u-thai, C. (2026). Comparative Evaluation of Foliar-Applied Selenium Biofortification in Different Rice Genotypes. Agronomy, 16(2), 269. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16020269

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop