Preliminary Study on Control Efficacy and Mechanism of Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Test Materials
2.2. Toxicity of Cyproconazole Against Puccinia polysora
2.3. Evaluation of the Control Efficacy of Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust
2.3.1. Evaluation of Seedling Stage Control Efficacy
2.3.2. Evaluation of Field Control Efficacy
2.3.3. Evaluation Criteria for Southern Corn Rust
2.4. Cyproconazole Effects on Infection Structures of Puccinia polysora
2.5. Determination of Phytotoxicity and Environmental Safety
2.6. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Phytotoxicity and Environmental Safety of Tested Fungicides
3.2. Effects of Cyproconazole on Urediniospore Germination and Germ Tube Elongation of Puccinia polysora
3.3. Seedling Efficacy of Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust
3.3.1. Duration of Efficacy and Protective Effect of Cyproconazole
3.3.2. Curative Activity of Cyproconazole
3.4. Field Efficacy and Yield Preservation of Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust
3.4.1. Field Efficacy and Yield Preservation of Protective Treatment with Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust
3.4.2. Field Efficacy and Yield Preservation of Curative Treatment with Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust
3.4.3. Field Efficacy and Yield Preservation of Integrated Treatment with Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust
3.5. Observation of Puccinia polysora Infection Structures Under Cyproconazole Treatment
4. Discussion
4.1. Antifungal Activity and Field Efficacy Differences of Cyproconazole Against Puccinia polysora
4.2. Control Efficacy and Yield Preservation Effect of Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust
4.3. Action Mechanism of Cyproconazole Against Infection Structures of Puccinia polysora
4.4. Limitations of the Present Study
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, S.; Zhang, R.Y.; Shi, Z.; Zhao, Y.X.; Su, A.G.; Wang, Y.D.; Xing, J.F.; Ge, J.R.; Li, C.H.; Wang, X.; et al. Identification and Fine Mapping of RppM, a Southern Corn Rust Resistance Gene in Maize. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Cao, Y.Y.; Cheng, Z.Q.; Ma, J.; Yang, W.B.; Liu, X.M.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.H.; Wu, X.L.; Duan, C.X. Advances in research on southern corn rust, a devasting fungal disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 13644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Sun, G.C.; Mural, R.V.; Turkus, J.D.; Schnable, J.C. Quantitative resistance loci to southern rust mapped in a temperate maize diversity panel. Phytopathology 2021, 112, 579–587. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Q.Y.; Li, L.F.; Guo, F.; Zhang, K.Y.; Dong, J.Y.; Luo, Y.; Ma, Z.H. Southern corn rust caused by Puccinia polysora Underw: A review. Phytopathol. Res. 2021, 3, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, X.F.; Xu, J.Y.; Gu, Y.L.; Sun, Q.Y.; Yuan, W.Y.; Ma, Z.H. Occurrence of Puccinia polysora Causing Southern Corn Rust in the Northeast Huanghuaihai Region of China. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, X.T.; Xie, S.N.; Du, Y.T.; Ren, L.L.; Zhang, X.F.; Chen, W.; Gao, H.W.; Duan, C.X.; Hao, J.J. Resistance analysis and resistance gene detection of regional trial varieties to southern rust in summer maize area of Huang-Huai-Hai. J. Maize Sci. 2025, 33, 114–119. [Google Scholar]
- Gustavo, M.; Kaian, A.C.K.; Fernando, E.; Regis, T.V.; Silvio, D.F.; Vanessa, A.E.; Eloisa, M.; Willian, B.R.; Jonas, F.E. Effect of fungicide application times in the control management of leaf foliar diseases in maize. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2015, 10, 3686–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wang, X.T.; Li, B.Y.; Xie, S.N.; Sun, J.; Ru, Y.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.Y.; Wu, Z.Q.; Xu, H.L.; Hao, J.J. Resistance evaluation and resistance gene detection of main maize varieties against southern corn rust. Plant Prot. 2025, 51, 297–306+316. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, J.; Ru, Y.Y.; Xie, S.N.; Liu, J.N.; Xiao, H.; Li, B.Y.; Zhu, W.L.; Wang, X.T.; Shang, D.Y.; Guo, X.Q.; et al. Efficacy and economic benefit of different fungicides against southern corn rust. Plant Prot. 2025, 51, 342–350+377. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, J.Y.; Wei, S.Z.; Liu, Y.Y.; Zhao, Z.Q.; Shi, J. Harnessing genetic resistance in maize and integrated rust management strategies to combat southern corn rust. J. Fungi 2025, 11, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- China Pesticide Information Network. Available online: http://www.chinapesticide.org.cn/ (accessed on 22 June 2026).
- Wang, Y.F.; Gong, M.H.; Li, H.H.; Xu, Y.W.; Xiao, J.B.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Chang, J.X.; Yuan, H.X.; Li, H.L.; Shi, Y. Research progress on southern corn rust. J. Henan Agric. Univ. 2024, 58, 357–364. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, J.; Wang, X.T.; Xie, S.N.; Ren, L.L.; Liu, J.Z.; Zhu, W.L.; Huo, M.X.; Li, B.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.W.; et al. Analysis of control efficacy and economic benefits of fungicide application timing and frequency on southern corn rust. J. Maize Sci. 2025, 33, 144–151. [Google Scholar]
- Tian, Y.J.; Zhao, S.G.; Zhang, J.; Huang, L.H.; Wang, Q.Y.; Chen, H.D. Occurence dynamics and chemical control of southern rust on fresh corn. Plant Prot. 2016, 42, 177–180+196. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.W.; Bao, L.; Wan, Q.; Chen, L.; Qi, Y.X. Control efficacy of different fungicides and application technologies on southern corn rust. Plant Prot. 2024, 50, 368–375. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.G.; Shao, Y.F.; Zhao, X.Y.; Pei, Q.H.; Nan, N.; Zhang, F.W.; Jiang, X.Y.; Li, X.D. High-efficiency fungicide screening and field control efficacy of maize southern corn rust. Crop Prot. 2025, 187, 106997. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, N.; Ma, J.Y.; Zhang, H.J.; Shi, J.; Li, P.; Sun, H. Control efficacy of difenoconazole and propiconazole on leaf spots in summer corn growing region in Huanghuaihai. Plant Prot. 2017, 43, 213–217+232. [Google Scholar]
- Faske, T.R.; Emerson, M. Multiyear evaluation of fungicide efficacy and application timing for control of southern rust in hybrid corn in Arkansas. Plant Dis. 2021, 105, 1108–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.L.; Miao, J.Q.; Zhang, C. Fungicide resistance and the management strategies. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2022, 24, 921–936. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, K.; Duan, C.X.; Wu, X.F.; Yang, Z.H.; Wang, X.M. Histology and ultrastructure of maize lines infected by Puccinia polysora. J. Plant Prot. 2015, 42, 877–883. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, K.; Ma, Q.; Huang, F.Y.; Wang, X.M. Comparison of the histopathological characters of Puccinia polysora between resistant and susceptible maize inbreds. Plant Prot. 2011, 37, 76–79. [Google Scholar]
- Matsuoka, K.J.; Suzuki, Y.Y.; Koyama, T.; Matsushita, T.; Hatano, K. Fluorogenic glycopolymers available for determining the affinity of lectins by intermolecular FRET. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 127024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
- Montenegro, H.O.; Di Chenna, P.H.; Spagnuolo, C.C.; Laura, U.M. Multivalent assembly of a pyrene functionalized thio-N-acetylglucosamine: Synthesis, spectroscopic and WGA binding studies. Carbohydr. Res. 2019, 479, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Feng, L.J.; Zhang, L.Y.; Wang, X.D.; Zhai, T.; Gan, P.F.; Tang, C.L.; Kang, Z.S.; Wang, X.J. Functional analysis of protein kinase TaPiPK1 in wheat resistance response to stripe rust. Plant Prot. 2023, 49, 32–38+84. [Google Scholar]
- Qu, Y.H.; Yang, H.L.; Hao, Q.N.; Chen, S.L.; Deng, K.L.; Zhan, G.M.; Cao, D.; Chen, L.M.; Yuan, S.L.; Zhang, C.J.; et al. Effectiveness of different staining methods for microscopic observation during different infestations of soybean rust fungus. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2025, 47, 186–191. [Google Scholar]
- Ling, Y.; Zhou, Z.H.; Liu, R.J.; Qin, H.L.; Li, C.P.; Hu, W.J.; Deng, W.C.; Wu, Y.J.; Yi, T.Y. Biological activity and indoor control efficacy of three triazole fungicides against Diaporthe eres. Chin. J. Pestic. Sci. 2025, 27, 543–550. [Google Scholar]
- Gu, L.L.; Xu, D.X.; Wang, Y.Q. Brief review on the types of fungicides registered in China for wheat rust control. China Plant Prot. 2022, 42, 65–68+72. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, A.L.; Hou, S.Y.; Zhang, G.; Yao, Q. Control efficacy of 40% cyproconazole suspension concentrate against wheat stripe rust. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2010, 5, 176–177. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J.K. Study on field efficacy trials of 40% cyproconazole suspension concentrate against wheat rust. Mod. Rural Sci. Technol. 2014, 12, 61–62. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.F.; Huang, L.; Luo, W.; Jin, Y.R.; Gong, F.Y.; He, J.S.; Liu, D.C.; Zheng, Y.L.; Wu, B.H. Transcriptome analysis provides insights into the mechanisms underlying wheat cultivar Shumai126 responding to stripe rust. Gene 2020, 768, 145290. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Zhao, H.T.; Chen, D.K.; Chen, X.L.; Ou, Z.T.; Huang, Q.C.; Zhang, L.; Li, G.G.; Liu, Y.X.; Ye, Y.F.; Fu, G. Pathogen identification and bactericide screening of Orah citrus canker. J. South. Agric. 2019, 50, 2703–2712. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, B.S.; Chen, T.; Wang, H.X. Isolation and identification of areca nut anthrax pathogens and screening of control agents. Mol. Plant Breed. 2023, 21, 7444–7449. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, R.; Li, J.; Xie, Y.; Liao, C.X. Analysis of cyproconazole 40% SC by HPLC. Agrochemicals 2022, 61, 189–191. [Google Scholar]
- Lhomme, L.; Brosillon, S.; Wolbert, D. Photocatalytic degradation of a triazole pesticide, cyproconazole, in water. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2006, 188, 34–42. [Google Scholar]
- Bi, Q.Y.; Zhao, J.J.; Zhang, S.Q.; Han, X.Y.; Wu, J.; Lu, F.; Wang, W.Q. Sensitivity of Septoria piricola Desm from pear in Hebei Province to different classes of fungicides and correlation coefficient with tebuconazole. Acta Phytopathol. Sin. 2021, 51, 248–257. [Google Scholar]
- Kiersten, A.W.; Damon, S.; Anna, F.; Daren, S.M.; Yuba, K.; Tom, A.; Carl, A.B.; Emmanuel, B.; Martin, C.; Travis, F.; et al. Meta-analysis of yield response of foliar fungicide-treated hybrid corn in the United States and Ontario, Canada. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217510. [Google Scholar]
- Sanjog, C.; Srabani, D.; Rakesh, Y.; Bikash, S. Assessment of yield losses and management of Southern corn rust (Puccinia polysora) through the foliar application of chemical fungicides, botanicals extract and bio-agents. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2025, 58, 898–913. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.G. Screening of High-Efficiency Fungicides Against Southern Corn Rust and Preliminary Study on Its Mechanism. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China, 2025. [Google Scholar]
- Dominguez, A.N.; Jimenez, L.E.; Álvarez, R.M.S. Rapid detection of pyraclostrobin fungicide residues in lemon with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2023, 17, 6350–6362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]




| Growth Stage | Virulence Regression Equation | Correlation Coefficient | EC50 (mg·L−1) | 95% Confidence Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spore Germination | y = −17.75 + 9.61x | 0.996 | 70.455 | 68.347–72.585 |
| Germ Tube Elongation | y = −2.69 + 2.02x | 0.996 | 21.686 | 0.2–37.312 |
| Fungicides | Time Interval of Application and Inoculation/Days | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 10 | |
| 40% Cyproconazole SC | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| 35% Pyraclostrobin–Epoxiconazole SC | − | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| Control | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Fungicides | Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 40% Cyproconazole SC | 4.94 ± 1.24 c | 91.11 ± 2.22 a |
| 35% Pyraclostrobin–Epoxiconazole SC | 12.34 ± 1.23 b | 77.78 ± 2.22 b |
| Control | 55.56 ± 2.14 a | - |
| Fungicides | Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 40% Cyproconazole SC | 16.05 ± 1.24 c | 82.19 ± 1.37 a |
| 35% Pyraclostrobin–Epoxiconazole SC | 24.69 ± 3.27 b | 72.60 ± 3.62 b |
| Control | 90.12 ± 2.47 a | - |
| Location | Fungicides | 14 Days After Inoculation | 21 Days After Inoculation | 45 Days After Inoculation | Yield Loss Recovery Rate (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) | Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) | Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) | |||
| Jingxiu | 40% Cyproconazole SC | 8.89 ± 0.55 c | 73.34 ± 1.67 a | 10.37 ± 0.37 c | 87.03 ± 0.47 a | 20.00 ± 1.92 c | 78.38 ± 2.15 a | 43.08 ± 9.38 a |
| 35% Pyraclostrobin–Epoxiconazole SC | 10.37 ± 0.19 b | 68.89 ± 0.56 b | 33.33 ± 0.00 b | 58.33 ± 0.33 b | 42.59 ± 1.62 b | 54.00 ± 1.78 b | 26.35 ± 3.83 a | |
| Control | 33.33 ± 0.00 a | - | 80.00 ± 0.64 a | - | 92.59 ± 0.37 a | - | - | |
| Dingxing | 40% Cyproconazole SC | 8.33 ± 0.32 b | 75.77 ± 1.25 a | 10.00 ± 0.32 b | 86.23 ± 0.35 a | 34.07 ± 0.74 c | 65.93 ± 0.74 a | 48.63 ± 6.04 a |
| 35% Pyraclostrobin–Epoxiconazole SC | 9.08 ± 0.81 b | 73.60 ± 2.54 a | 10.19 ± 0.37 b | 85.97 ± 0.51 a | 55.56 ± 0.00 b | 44.44 ± 0.00 b | 41.05 ± 1.21 a | |
| Control | 34.44 ± 0.64 a | - | 72.59 ± 0.98 a | - | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | - | - | |
| Location | Fungicides | 14 Days After Inoculation | 21 Days After Inoculation | 45 Days After Inoculation | Yield Loss Recovery Rate (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) | Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) | Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) | |||
| Jingxiu | 40% Cyproconazole SC | 11.11 ± 0.00 b | 66.67 ± 0.00 b | 11.11 ± 0.00 c | 86.11 ± 0.11 a | 17.78 ± 1.28 c | 80.79 ± 1.45 a | 33.81 ± 5.42 a |
| 35% Pyraclostrobin–Epoxiconazole SC | 10.74 ± 0.18 c | 67.78 ± 0.55 a | 25.56 ± 0.64 b | 68.06 ± 0.71 b | 54.44 ± 0.64 b | 41.20 ± 0.73 b | 25.24 ± 2.21 a | |
| Control | 33.33 ± 0.00 a | - | 80.00 ± 0.64 a | - | 92.59 ± 0.37 a | - | - | |
| Dingxing | 40% Cyproconazole SC | 20.37 ± 0.37 b | 40.86 ± 0.57 b | 26.30 ± 0.98 b | 63.73 ± 1.82 b | 30.74 ± 0.98 c | 69.26 ± 0.98 a | 47.99 ± 3.15 a |
| 35% Pyraclostrobin–Epoxiconazole SC | 9.07 ± 0.37 c | 73.60 ± 1.50 a | 11.11 ± 0.00 c | 84.69 ± 0.20 a | 78.15 ± 0.37 b | 21.85 ± 0.37 b | 18.89 ± 4.95 b | |
| Control | 34.44 ± 0.64 a | - | 72.59 ± 0.98 a | - | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | - | - | |
| Location | Fungicides | 14 Days After Inoculation | 21 Days After Inoculation | 45 Days After Inoculation | Yield Loss Recovery Rate (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) | Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) | Disease Index | Control Efficacy (%) | |||
| Jingxiu | 40% Cyproconazole SC | 8.70 ± 0.37 c | 73.89 ± 1.11 a | 10.93 ± 0.18 c | 86.34 ± 0.26 a | 12.22 ± 0.64 c | 86.80 ± 0.65 a | 54.09 ± 3.71 a |
| 35% Pyraclostrobin–Epoxiconazole SC | 9.63 ± 0.19 b | 71.11 ± 0.56 b | 23.33 ± 1.28 b | 70.82 ± 1.74 b | 24.07 ± 1.38 b | 74.01 ± 1.34 b | 28.76 ± 0.60 b | |
| Control | 33.33 ± 0.00 a | - | 80.00 ± 0.64 a | - | 92.59 ± 0.37 a | - | - | |
| Dingxing | 40% Cyproconazole SC | 8.33 ± 0.32 c | 75.83 ± 0.48 a | 9.63 ± 0.19 c | 86.74 ± 0.10 a | 26.67 ± 0.64 c | 73.33 ± 0.64 a | 54.51 ± 3.47 a |
| 35% Pyraclostrobin–Epoxiconazole SC | 13.52 ± 1.13 b | 60.60 ± 4.02 b | 18.89 ± 1.28 b | 74.00 ± 1.55 b | 35.56 ± 1.93 b | 64.44 ± 1.93 b | 39.31 ± 2.06 b | |
| Control | 34.44 ± 0.64 a | - | 72.59 ± 0.98 a | - | 100.00 ± 0.00 a | - | - | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Wang, S.; Zhu, X.; Ma, H.; Sun, H.; Zhang, S.; Guo, N.; Shi, J. Preliminary Study on Control Efficacy and Mechanism of Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust. Agronomy 2026, 16, 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16131238
Wang S, Zhu X, Ma H, Sun H, Zhang S, Guo N, Shi J. Preliminary Study on Control Efficacy and Mechanism of Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust. Agronomy. 2026; 16(13):1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16131238
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Siqi, Xiaoming Zhu, Hongxia Ma, Hua Sun, Shuo Zhang, Ning Guo, and Jie Shi. 2026. "Preliminary Study on Control Efficacy and Mechanism of Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust" Agronomy 16, no. 13: 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16131238
APA StyleWang, S., Zhu, X., Ma, H., Sun, H., Zhang, S., Guo, N., & Shi, J. (2026). Preliminary Study on Control Efficacy and Mechanism of Cyproconazole Against Southern Corn Rust. Agronomy, 16(13), 1238. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16131238

