Impact of Organic Digestate on Soil and Crop Nitrogen During Critical Periods of Winter Oilseed Rape Growth
Abstract
1. Introduction
- (1)
- What happens to N introduced into the soil when the NFRV is less than 1.0?
- (2)
- Does digestate introduced into the soil induce N and accelerate its release from natural soil resources when the NFRV is above 1.0?
- (1)
- Loss of ammonia into the atmosphere;
- (2)
- Fixation by soil microorganisms (biological immobilization);
- (3)
- Nitrification to nitrate, which is either the final stage (uptake by plants) or only an intermediate step;
- (4)
- Loss of gaseous N compounds due to ammonium nitrate denitrification.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Site—Basic Soil Properties
2.2. Setup of the Field Experiment
2.3. Basic Set of Chemical Analysis
2.4. Calculated Nitrogen Indices
- Nin30 = NAR + Nmin30, kg N ha−1;
- Nb60 = Nin30 − NAF, kg N ha−1;
- Ngain60 = Nmin60 − Nb, kg N ha−1;
- N60T = NAF + Nmin60, kg N ha−1;
- NE60 = (NAF/Nin30) × 100%;
- NE60T = (N60T/Nin30) × 100%.
- Nb89 = N60T − NAH, kg N ha−1;
- Ngain/loss89 = Nmin89 − Nb89, kg N ha−1;
- N89T = NAH + Nmin89, kg N ha−1;
- NE89 = (NAH/N60T) × 100%;
- NE89T = (NAH/N89T) × 100%.
2.5. Statistical Analyses
3. Results
3.1. Seed Yield of Rapeseed
3.2. Preanthesis–Vegetative Phases of Winter Oilseed Rape Growth
- (1)
- NAFmaz: AN (306.4) ≥ DAN (301.6) > D (270 kg N ha−1);
- (2)
- Nop for NAF maximum: DAN (238.5) > D (199.2) > AN (189.0 kg N ha−1).
- (1)
- Nb60min: DAN (−115.1) ≥ AN (−113.9) > D (−102.3 kg N ha−1);
- (2)
- Nop for Nbmax: DAN (171.6) > D (170.5) > AN (149.1 kg N ha−1).
- (1)
- Ngain60max: AN (197.7) ≥ DAN (189.8) > D (174.1 kg N ha−1);
- (2)
- Nop for Ngain60: DAN (238.5) > D (185.5) > AN (158.9 kg N ha−1).
3.3. Reproductive Growth—Seed-Filling Period
- (1)
- AN: ;
- (2)
- D: ;
- (3)
- DAN: .
4. Discussion
4.1. Nitrogen Economy During the Critical Periods of Yield Formation
- (1)
- The decisive influence of weather conditions during the study growing seasons (the year factor);
- (2)
- The significant and strong impact of increasing nitrogen doses;
- (3)
- No difference in the value of nitrogen fertilizer replacement (NFRV) for the tested N carriers.
4.2. Nitrogen-Use Efficiency—A Realistic Evaluation
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AN | Ammonium nitrate |
| CV | Coefficient of variation |
| D | Digestate |
| FS | Fertilization system |
| AN | Ammonium nitrogen-based FS |
| D | Digestate-based FS |
| DAN | Mixed (1/3AN + 2/3D) FS |
| N | Nitrogen |
| Nf | Nitrogen fertilizer |
| NAH, Nh | Nitrogen amount in crop biomass at harvest |
| NAF, Nf | Nitrogen amount in crop biomass at anthesis |
| NAR | Nitrogen amount in crop biomass at rosette |
| Nb | Nitrogen balance |
| NE | Nitrogen efficiency |
| NFRV | Nitrogen fertilizer replacement value |
| Ngain | N released from soil resources |
| Nmin | Inorganic soil nitrogen |
| NUE | Nitrogen-use efficiency |
| SEY | Yield of seeds |
| SFP | Seed-filling period |
| T | Total |
| WOSR | Winter oilseed rape |
References
- Martínez-Suller, L.; Azzellini, A.; Provolo, G. Analysis of livestock slurries from farms across Northern Italy: Relationship between indicators and nutrient content. Biosyst. Eng. 2008, 99, 540–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przygocka-Cyana, K.; Zawieja-Roszak, A. Sulfur added to cattle slurry as a means to improve the nitrogen economy of maize during the grain filling period. J. Elem. 2024, 29, 433–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makadi, M.; Tomocsik, A.; Orosz, V. Digestate: A new nutrient source—A review. In Biogas; Kumar, S., Ed.; InTech: London, UK, 2012; pp. 295–312. [Google Scholar]
- Doyeni, M.O.; Stulpinaite, U.; Baksinskaite, A.; Supronienie, S.; Tilvikiene, V. The effectiveness of digestate use for fertilization in an agricultural cropping system. Plants 2021, 10, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smit, M.F.; Vonk, W.J.; Hijbeek, R. A variable residue: Meta-analysis on the nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of anaerobic digestate. Eur. J. Agron. 2026, 172, 127845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sieling, K.; Herrmann, A.; Wienforth, B.; Taube, F.; Ohl, S.; Hartung, E.; Kage, H. Biogas cropping systems: Short term response of yield performance and N use efficiency to biogas residue application. Eur. J. Agron. 2013, 47, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zillo, M.; Pigoli, A.; Rizzi, B.; Goglio, A.; Tambone, F.; Giordano, A.; Maretto, L.; Squartini, A.; Stevanato, P.; Meers, E.; et al. Nitrogen dynamics in soil fertilized with digestate and mineral fertilizers: A full field approach. Sci. Tot. Environ. 2023, 868, 161500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Westerik, D.; Hoffland, E.; Hijbeek, R. Nitrogen fertilizer replacement value of organic amendments: Determination and prediction. Nutr. Cyckl. Agroecosystems 2024, 129, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alburquerque, J.A.; De la Fuente, C.; Ferre-Costa, A.; Carrasco, L.; Cegarra, J.; Abad, M.; Bernal, M.P. Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agro-industrial residues. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 40, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Möller, K. Effects of anaerobic digestion on soil carbon and nitrogen turnover, N emissions, and soil biological activity, A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 35, 1021–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verdi, L.; Kuikman, P.J.; Orlandinimi, S.; Mancini, M.; Napoli, M.; Dalla Marta, A. Does the use of digestate to replace mineral fertilizers have less emissions of N2O and NH3? Agric. For. Meteo. 2019, 260–270, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nyang’au, J.O.; Sorensen, P.; Moller, H.B. Nitrogen availability in digestates from full-scale biogas plants following soil application as affected by operation parameters and input feedstocks. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2023, 24, 101675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedersen, J.; Hafner, S.D. Ammonia emissions after field application of anaerobically digested animal slurry: Literature review and perspectives. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 2023, 307, 108697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzebisz, W.; Niewiadomska, A.; Przygocka-Cyna, K. Nitrogen Hotspots on the farm—A practice oriented approach. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Midden, C.; Harris, J.; Shaw, L.; Sizmur, T.; Pawlett, M. The impact of anaerobic digestate on soil life: A review. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 191, 105066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siebielec, S.; Siebielec, G.; Woźniak, M. Potential of by means of digestate to regenerate and stimulate its biological life. Pol. J. Agron. 2023, 52, 157–170. [Google Scholar]
- Dmuchowski, W.; Baczewska-Dąbrowska, A.H.; Gworek, B. Impact of agriculture on N2O emissions: A review. J. Elem. 2023, 28, 917–935. [Google Scholar]
- Efosa, N.; Krause, H.-M.; Hüppi, R.; Krauss, M.; Vaucher, N.; Zourek, F.; Mayer, J.; Six, J.; Bünemann, E. Emissions of nitrous oxide and methane after field application of liquid fertilizers and biochar. Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 2023, 356, 108642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ries, J.; Chen, Z.; Park, Y. Potential applications of food-waste-based anaerobic digestate for sustainable crop production practice. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przygocka-Cyna, K.; Grzebisz, W. Biogas digestate—Benefits and risks for soil fertility and crop quality—An evaluation of grain maize response. Open Chem. 2018, 16, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Przygocka-Cyna, K.; Grzebisz, W. The multifactorial effect of digestate on the availability of soil elements and grain yield and its mineral profile—The case of maize. Agronomy 2020, 10, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piccoli, L.; Grillo, F.; Longo, M.; Furlanetto, I.; Ragazzi, F.; Obber, S.; Bonato, T.; Meneghetti, F.; Ferlito, J.; Saccardo, L.; et al. A farm-scale sustainability assessment of the anaerobic digestate application methods. Eur. J. Agron. 2023, 146, 126811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simon, T.; Kunzova, E.; Friedlova, M. The effect of digestate, cattle slurry and mineral fertilization on the winter wheat yield and quality parameters. Plant Soil Environ. 2016, 61, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łukowiak, R.; Szczepaniak, W.; Młodecki, D. Impact of digestate-derived nitrogen on nutrient content dynamics in winter oilseed rape before anthesis. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slafer, G.A.; Garcia, G.A.; Serrago, R.A.; Miralles, D.J. Physiological drivers of responses of grains per m2 to environmental and genetic factors in wheat. Field Crops Res. 2022, 285, 108593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulte auf’m Erley, G.; Behrens, T.; Ulas, A.; Wiesler, F.; Horst, W.J. Agronomic traits contributing to nitrogen efficiency of winter oilseed rape cultivars. Field Crops Res. 2011, 124, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szczepaniak, W.; Grzebisz, W.; Potarzycki, J.; Łukowiak, R.; Przygocka-Cyna, K. Nutritional status of winter oilseed rape in cardinal stages of growth as yield indicator. Plant Soil Environ. 2015, 61, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzebisz, W.; Szczepaniak, W.; Grześ, S. Sources of nutrients for high-yielding winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) during post-anthesis growth. Agronomy 2020, 10, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sassenrath, G.F.; Schneider, J.M.; Gaj, R.; Grzebisz, W.; Halloran, J.M. Nitrogen balance as an indicator of environmental impact: Toward sustainable agriculture production. Renew. Agric. Food Sys. 2013, 28, 276–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rutkowska, A. productivity of winter oilseed rape depending on its nitrogen and water use efficiency. Pol. J. Agron. 2019, 39, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
- Sikorska, A.; Gugała, M.; Zarzecka, K.; Mystkowska, I.; Findura, P.; Pristavka, M. Quality of winter rapeseeds (Brassica napus L.) depending on the genetic factor and on soil and foliar applications on mineral and organic substances. J. Elem. 2023, 28, 1175–1190. [Google Scholar]
- Łukowiak, R.; Grzebisz, W. Effect of site specific nitrogen management on seed nitrogen—A driving factor of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) yield. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Mathieu, A.; Cournede, P.H.; Allirand, J.M.; Jullien, A.; de Reffye, P.; Zhang, B.G. Variability and regulation of the number of ovules, seeds, and pods according to assimilate availability in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Field Crops Res. 2011, 122, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weymann, W.; Bottcher, U.; Sieling, K.; Kage, H. Effects of weather conditions during different growth phases on yield formation of winter oilseed rape. Field Crop. Res. 2015, 173, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barłóg, P.; Grzebisz, W. Effect of timing and nitrogen fertilizer application on winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). I. Growth dynamics and seed yield. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2004, 190, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barłóg, P.; Grzebisz, W. Effect of timing and nitrogen fertilizer application on winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). II. Nitrogen uptake dynamics and fertilizer efficiency. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2004, 190, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leśkiewicz, K. Food production in a circular economy—Selected legal aspects. Stud. Jurid. Lubliniensia 2017, 26, 503–518, (In Polish with English summary). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Stewart, B.A. Benefits and unintended consequences of synthetic nitrogen fertilizers. In Soil Nitrogen Uses and Environmental Impacts, 1st ed.; Lal, R., Stewart, B.A., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018; 20p. [Google Scholar]
- Timonen, K.; Sinkko, T.; Luostarinen, S.; Tampio, E.; Joensuu, K. LCA of Anaerobic Digestion: Emission Allocation for Energy and Digestate. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 1567–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISO 11277; Soil Quality–Determination of Particle Size Distribution in Mineral Soil Material. Method by Sieving and Sedimentation. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
- PTGleb. Particle size distribution and textural classes of soils and mineral materials–classification of Polish Society of Soil Sciences. Soil Sci. Ann. 2008, 60, 5–16. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Sumner, M.E.; Miller, W.P. Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3—CHEMICAL Methods; Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Helmke, P.A., Loeppert, R.H., Soltanpour, P.N., Tabatabai, M.A., Johnston, C.T., Sumner, M.E., Bartels, J.M., Bigham, J.M., Eds.; Soil Science Society of America: Madison, WI, USA, 1996; pp. 1201–1229. [Google Scholar]
- Shuman, L.M.; Duncan, R.R. Soil exchangeable cations and aluminum measured by ammonium chloride, potassium chloride, and ammonium acetate. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1990, 21, 1217–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehlich, A. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: A modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1984, 15, 1409–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kęsik, K. Application of the Mehlich 3 method in the fertilizer advisory system. Stud. I Rap. IUNG-PIB 2016, 48, 95–104. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Trávník, K.; Zbíral, J.; Němec, P. Agrochemical Soil Testing—Mehlich III; Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture: Brno, Czech, 1999. (In Czech) [Google Scholar]
- Zbíral, J. Determination of plant-available micronutrients by the Mehlich 3 soil extractant—A proposal of critical values. Plant Soil Environ. 2016, 62, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- PN-EN 27888:1999; Water Quality–Determination of Electrical Conductivity. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 1999.
- PN-EN ISO 10523:2012; Water Quality–Soil pH Determination. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 2012.
- Houba, V.J.G.; Temminghoff, E.J.M.; Gaikhorst, G.A.; van Vark, W. Soil analysis procedures using 0.01 M calcium chloride as extraction reagents. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant 2000, 31, 1299–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- PN-EN ISO 13395:2001; Water Quality—Determination of Nitrate and Nitrate Nitrogen and Their Sum by Flow Analysis (CFA and FIA) with spectrophotometric detection. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 2001.
- Fotyma, E.; Fotyma, M.; Pietruch, C. The content of mineral N in arable soils in Poland. Fertil. Fertil. 2004, 3, 11–54. [Google Scholar]
- PN-EN ISO 20483:2014-02; Cereal Grains and Pulses—Determination of Nitrogen Content and Conversion to Crude Protein—Kjeldahl Method. PKN: Warsaw, Poland, 2014; 24p.
- Wilding, L.P.; Dress, L.R. Spatial variability and pedology. In Pedogenesis and Soil Taxonomy; Wilding, L.P., Smeck, N., Hall, G.F., Eds.; Elsevier: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1983; pp. 83–116. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, G. Step away from stepwise. J. Big Data 2018, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barraclough, P.B. Root growth, macro-nutrient uptake dynamics and soil fertility requirements of a high-yielding winter oilseed rape crop. Plant Soil 1989, 119, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malagoli, M.; Laine, P.; Rossato, L.; Ourry, A. Dynamics of nitrogen uptake and mobilization in field-grown winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) from stem extension to harvest. I. Global N flows between vegetative and reproductive tissues in relations to leaf fall and their residual N. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Grzebisz, W.; Potarzycki, J. A realistic approach to calculating the nitrogen use efficiency index in cereals with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as an example. Agronomy 2025, 15, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abid, M.; Shao, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, F.; Gao, J.; Jiang, D.; Tian, Z.; Dai, T. Pre-drought priming sustains grain development under post-anthesis drought stress by regulating the growth hormones in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Planta 2017, 246, 509–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Smith, M.R.; Rao, I.M.; Merchant, A. Source-sink relationships in crop plants and their influence on yield development and nutritional quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Ma, C.Z.; Yue, Y.; Hu, K.N.; Li, Y.Y.; Duan, Z.Q. Unravelling the complex trait of harvest index in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) with association mapping. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pullens, J.W.M.; Sharif, B.; Trnka, M.; Balek, J.; Semenov, M.A.; Olesen, J.E. Risk factor for European winter oilseed rape production under climate change. Agric. For. Meteor. 2019, 272–273, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, J.M.; Galantani, J.A.; Duval, M.W. Contribution of nitrogen mineralization indices, labile organic matter and soil properties in predicting nitrogen mineralization. J. Soil Plant Nutr. 2018, 18, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hemat, M.; Ding, X.; Sui, Q.; Dong, B.; Bai, Z.; Fan, J. Effects of Irrigation Lower Limit and Nitrogen Rate on Productivity, Resource Use Efficiency, and Economic Benefits of Winter Rapeseed in Semi-Arid Conditions. Agronomy 2026, 16, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Recous, S.; Machet, J.-M. Short-term immobilisation and the crop uptake of fertilizer nitrogen applied to winter wheat: Effect of date application in spring. Plant Soil 1999, 206, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharifi, M.; Baker, S.; Hojabri, L.; Hajiaghaeri-Kamrani, M. Short-term nitrogen dynamics in a soil amended with anaerobic digestate. Can. J. Soil Sci. 2019, 99, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stepaniuk, M.; Głowacka, A. Yield of Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L. var. napus) in a Short-Term Monoculture and the Macronutrient Accumulation in Relation to the Dose and Method of Sulphur Application. Agronomy 2022, 12, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouchet, A.S.; Laperche, A.; Bissuel, C.; Snowdon, R.; Nesi, N.; Stahl, A. Nitrogen use efficiency in rapeseed. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yahbi, M.; Nabloussi, A.; Maataoui, A.; El Alami, N.; Boutagayout, A.; Daoui, K. Effects of nitrogen rates on yield, yield components, and other related attributes of different rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) varieties. OCL 2022, 29, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Körner, C. Paradigm shift in plant growth control. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 25, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Sun, H.; Liu, L.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Li, A.; Bai, Z.; Wang, G.; Liu, X.; Dong, H. Optimizing crop yields while minimizing environmental impact through deep placement of nitrogen fertilizer. J. Integr. Agric. 2024, 24, 36–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, D.; Cao, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, Y.; Han, J. Optimising the effect of nitrogen on winter oilseed rape grain yield in China: A metaanalysis. Eur. J. Agron. 2023, 144, 126755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moll, R.H.; Kamprath, E.J.; Jackson, W.A. Analysis and interpretation of factors which contribute to efficiency of nitrogen utilization. Agron. J. 1982, 74, 562–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzebisz, W.; Przygocka-Cyna, K.; Szczepaniak, W.; Zawieja, A. Impact of winter oilseed rape nutritional status during vegetative growth and yield. Plant Soil Environ. 2019, 65, 490–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, B.; Ata-Ul-Karim, S.T.; Li, Y.; Ye, T.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, W.; Cao, Q.; Tang, L. Plant nitrogen status at phenological stages can well estimate wheat yield and its components. Field Crops Res. 2023, 297, 108950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sieling, K.; Günther-Borstel, O.; Teebeken, T.; Hanus, H. Soil mineral N and N net mineralization during autumn and winter under oilseed rape—Winter wheat—Winter barley rotation in different cropping systems. J. Agric. Sci. 1999, 132, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grzebisz, W.; Łukowiak, R.; Sassenrath, G. Virtual nitrogen as a tool for assessment of nitrogen at the field scale. Field Crops Res. 2018, 218, 182–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szczepaniak, W. A mineral profile of oilseed rape in critical stages of growth—Nitrogen. J. Elem. 2014, 19, 759–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pacifico, F.; Ronchetti, G.; Dentener, F.; van der Velde, M.; van den Berg, M.; Lugato, E. Quantifying the impact of an abrupt reduction in mineral nitrogen fertilization on crop yield in the European Union. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 954, 176692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]








| Factor | Level of Factor | SEY | SEYn | NAR | Nmin30 | Nin30 | NAF | Nb | Nmin60 | Ngain60 | Ngain60n | N60T | NE60 | NE60T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| t ha−1 | kg N ha−1 | % | ||||||||||||
| Year/season | 2015/2016 | 3.2 a | 1.6 b | 38.9 b | 100.0 b | 138.9 c | 233.2 b | −94.3 b | 60.9 b | 155.2 b | 101.9 b | 294.2 b | 165.2 b | 211.1 a |
| (Y) | 2016/2017 | 3.3 a | 2.0 a | 53.7 a | 115.1 a | 168.8 a | 287.5 a | −118.7 c | 49.2 c | 167.9 a | 114.3 a | 336.7 a | 171.5 a | 200.8 b |
| 2017/2018 | 2.0 b | 0.9 c | 33.2 c | 111.8 a | 145.0 b | 177.4 c | −32.4 a | 98.0 a | 130.4 c | 50.6 c | 275.4 c | 123.8 c | 194.2 b | |
| F-value, p | 315 *** | 286 *** | 83.8 *** | 21.9 *** | 80.2 *** | 609 *** | 116 *** | 788 *** | 83.3 *** | 136 *** | 176 *** | 264 *** | 18.0 *** | |
| Fertilization | AN | 2.7 b | 1.4 a | 45.1 a | 117.1 a | 162.2 a | 245.0 a | −82.8 ab | 74.0 a | 156.8 a | 93.9 a | 319.0 a | 151.7 | 199.0 |
| system | D | 2.8 b | 1.5 b | 40.3 b | 102.0 c | 142.3 b | 220.2 c | −77.9 c | 64.9 c | 142.7 b | 80.2 b | 285.0 c | 153.0 | 202.0 |
| (FS) | DAN | 3.0 a | 1.6 a | 40.4 b | 107.8 b | 148.2 b | 233.0 b | −84.7 a | 69.3 b | 154.0 a | 92.8 a | 302.3 b | 155.9 | 205.1 |
| F-value, p | 13.3 *** | 12.7 *** | 5.6 ** | 20.1 *** | 33.4 *** | 30.8 *** | 3.2 * | 25.3 *** | 12.7 *** | 6.8 ** | 51.1 *** | 1.8ns | 2.3 ns | |
| Nitrogen | 0 | 1.6 d | ─ | 37.3 b | 60.5 e | 97.8 e | 127.0 c | −29.2 a | 51.1 d | 80.3 d | ─ | 178.1 d | 130.1 c | 183.0 b |
| doses | 60 | 2.8 c | 1.1 b | 44.2 a | 76.8 d | 121.0 d | 194.2 b | −73.2 b | 59.0 c | 132.2 c | 55.1 b | 253.2 c | 159.9 a | 212.5 a |
| (ND) | 120 | 3.1 b | 1.5 ab | 46.6 a | 119.2 c | 165.7 c | 274.7 a | −109.0 d | 77.1 b | 186.1 a | 104.9 a | 351.8 b | 166.2 a | 214.0 a |
| 180 | 3.3 a | 1.7 a | 41.5 ab | 134.4 b | 175.9 b | 282.8 a | −106.9 d | 74.3 b | 184.1 a | 102.8 a | 360.0 ab | 162.7 a | 208.4 a | |
| 240 | 3.2 ab | 1.6 a | 40.0 ab | 154.0 a | 194.1 a | 284.8 a | −90.7 c | 82.5 a | 173.2 b | 93.0 a | 367.3 a | 148.7 b | 192.2 b | |
| F-value, p | 169 *** | 14.4 *** | 50.8 *** | 321 *** | 309 *** | 590 *** | 68.2 *** | 133 *** | 281 *** | 47.9 *** | 743 *** | 50.7 *** | 27.6 *** | |
| p for the relations between the studied factors | ||||||||||||||
| Y × FS | ns | ns | ns | ns | *** | *** | ns | ns | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Y × N | *** | * | ** | ** | *** | *** | ** | *** | ** | ** | *** | ** | ** | |
| FS × N | ns | ns | *** | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | ** | ** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Y × FS × N | *** | ** | ns | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Indicators of descriptive statistics | ||||||||||||||
| Mean | 2.8 | 1.5 | 41.9 | 109.0 | 150.9 | 232.7 | −81.8 | 69.4 | 151.2 | 89.0 | 302.1 | 153.5 | 202.0 | |
| Standard deviation | 0.9 | 0.5 | 11.7 | 410.7 | 44.3 | 83.5 | 53.6 | 27.9 | 51.1 | 43.6 | 86.8 | 31.3 | 25.6 | |
| Coefficient of variation,% | 33.3 | 38.3 | 27.9 | 38.2 | 29.4 | 35.9 | 65.5 | 40.2 | 33.8 | 49.1 | 28.7 | 20.4 | 12.7 | |
| Factor | Level of Factor | NAH | Nb89 | Nmin89 | Ngain89 | N89T | NE89 | NE89T |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kg N ha−1 | % | |||||||
| Year/season | 2015/2016 | 193.4 b | 100.4 c | 48.6 b | −51.8 a | 242.0 a | 66.7 a | 83.3 a |
| (Y) | 2016/2017 | 190.1 c | 146.5 b | 47.0 c | −99.5 c | 237.2 b | 56.6 b | 71.2 c |
| 2017/2018 | 114.9 a | 160.5 a | 102.1 a | −58.4 b | 217.0 c | 41.5 c | 79.0 b | |
| F-value. p | 444 *** | 255 *** | 1035 *** | 169 *** | 33.9 *** | 545 *** | 108 *** | |
| Fertilization | AN | 170.1 a | 147.8 a | 72.6 a | −75.3 b | 242.7 a | 53.4 b | 76.8 b |
| system | D | 161.6 b | 123.4 c | 64.3 b | −59.1 a | 226.0 b | 56.2 a | 80.1 a |
| (FS) | DAN | 166.7 ab | 136.2 b | 60.8 c | −75.4 b | 227.5 b | 55.2 a | 76.6 b |
| F-value. p | 4.1 * | 34.5 *** | 38.2 *** | 22.3 *** | 16.4 *** | 6.8 ** | 11.4 *** | |
| Nitrogen | 0 | 90.3 c | 88.9 c | 48.9 c | −40.0 a | 139.2 d | 51.3 c | 78.0 b |
| doses | 60 | 158.4 b | 94.8 c | 49.9 c | −44.9 a | 208.3 c | 61.8 a | 82.5 a |
| (ND) | 120 | 188.6 a | 161.5 b | 70.5 b | −91.0 b | 259.2 b | 53.5 bc | 74.6 c |
| 180 | 198.2 a | 161.8 b | 73.9 b | −87.9 b | 272.1 a | 54.8 b | 76.5 bc | |
| 240 | 195.2 a | 172.1 a | 86.3 a | −85.8 b | 281.5 a | 53.1 bc | 77.7 b | |
| F-value. p | 276 *** | 252 *** | 165 *** | 96.5 *** | 404 *** | 33.6 *** | 14.9 *** | |
| p for the relations between the studied factors | ||||||||
| Y × FS | * | *** | ns | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Y × N | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| FS × N | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Y × FS × N | ** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |
| Indicators of descriptive statistics | ||||||||
| Mean | 166.2 | 135.8 | 65.9 | −69.9 | 232.1 | 54.9 | 77.8 | |
| Standard deviation | 59.9 | 51.9 | 32.6 | 40.7 | 61.2 | 12.4 | 8.9 | |
| Coefficient of variation.% | 36.1 | 38.2 | 49.4 | 58.2 | 26.4 | 22.7 | 11.4 | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Szczepaniak, W.; Łukowiak, R.; Klikocka, H. Impact of Organic Digestate on Soil and Crop Nitrogen During Critical Periods of Winter Oilseed Rape Growth. Agronomy 2026, 16, 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16100959
Szczepaniak W, Łukowiak R, Klikocka H. Impact of Organic Digestate on Soil and Crop Nitrogen During Critical Periods of Winter Oilseed Rape Growth. Agronomy. 2026; 16(10):959. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16100959
Chicago/Turabian StyleSzczepaniak, Witold, Remigiusz Łukowiak, and Hanna Klikocka. 2026. "Impact of Organic Digestate on Soil and Crop Nitrogen During Critical Periods of Winter Oilseed Rape Growth" Agronomy 16, no. 10: 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16100959
APA StyleSzczepaniak, W., Łukowiak, R., & Klikocka, H. (2026). Impact of Organic Digestate on Soil and Crop Nitrogen During Critical Periods of Winter Oilseed Rape Growth. Agronomy, 16(10), 959. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16100959

