Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Analysis of the GH3 Gene Family in Nicotiana benthamiana and Its Role in Plant Defense Against Tomato Yellow Leaf Curl Virus
Next Article in Special Issue
Xylem Hydraulic Conductance and Stomatal Aperture Ratio Are Key Factors in Enhancing Drought Tolerance in Cotton
Previous Article in Journal
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Mitigate Crop Multi-Stresses Under Mediterranean Climate: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Screening of Sunflower Hybrids Using Physiological and Agronomic Traits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Promotion of Sweet Potato Growth and Yield by Decreasing Soil CO2 Concentrations with Forced Aeration

Organization for Research Promotion, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1-1 Gakuen-cho, Naka-ku, Sakai, Osaka 599-8531, Japan
Agronomy 2026, 16(1), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010114
Submission received: 13 November 2025 / Revised: 30 December 2025 / Accepted: 31 December 2025 / Published: 1 January 2026

Abstract

Effects of forced aeration on sweet potato growth and yield by decreasing CO2 concentrations in the rooting zone were investigated. The following four experiments were conducted with forced aeration in the rooting zone of sweet potato: (1) with air containing different CO2 concentrations to clarify the effects of CO2 in the rooting zone on the net photosynthetic rate and leaf conductance, (2) with atmospheric air into cultivating soil ridges through porous pipes as a feasibility study, (3) with varying forced-aeration rates, and (4) with varying time intervals of forced aeration to find a more efficient aeration method. The results are summarized as follows: (1) During the six-week growing period, the mean values of net photosynthetic rates and leaf conductance for 1% CO2 and 2% CO2 were 0.8 and 0.7 times, respectively, those in the Control with 0.04% CO2. (2) When the aeration rate was 1.5 L min−1 per 1 m of ridge length, the CO2 concentration reduced to 0.1–0.2% in the rooting zone, whereas the control ridge with non-forced aeration was 0.5–1.4% CO2. The fresh and dry weight yields of sweet potato tubers were 1.18 and 1.19 times those of the control, respectively. (3) The CO2 concentrations decreased as the aeration rate increased. The dry weights of tuberous roots in forced-aeration ridges at aeration rates of 1.25 and 2.5 L min−1 were 1.19 and 1.26 times those in the control, respectively. Sweet potato growth was promoted when forced aeration reduced CO2 in the rooting zone. (4) The yield increased by 24% even when forced aeration was performed for just 15 min per day after irrigation. In conclusion, reducing rooting zone CO2 concentrations through forced aeration, even for 15 minutes daily, improves sweet potato yield by approximately 20%.

1. Introduction

The world’s population is experiencing massive growth, particularly in developing countries [1]. This rapid increase poses a serious issue, as it will be accompanied by a significant food shortage.
The sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) is cultivated in temperate and tropical regions worldwide and is considered an important food source. Sweet potato is recognized as the seventh most important agricultural crop worldwide and has potential as an energy source [2,3]. It can fix relatively large amounts of energy and produce food even under poor soil conditions, contributing to its role as a food security crop in many parts of the world [4]. Sweet potato is actively incorporated into the diet as a second staple food, especially in developing countries [5]. It is a highly resilient crop with great potential to improve diets and food security [6]. In tropical and subtropical regions, it is particularly known for its nutritional balance, pest and disease resistance, drought tolerance, and year-round availability as a short-season crop [7]. Sweet potato tubers contain more vitamins, minerals, and proteins than other vegetables [8]. Sweet potato leaves also contain antioxidants such as β-carotene, ascorbic acid, and tocopherol [9]. Sweet potato tubers are rich in bioactive compounds and health-promoting carbohydrates [10]. Sweet potato is also a useful leafy vegetable [11], and its leaves and stems contain relatively high levels of antioxidant and polyphenolic compounds [12,13]. Therefore, sweet potato is recognized as a useful functional food for human health.
Adequate soil aeration is generally essential for healthy plant growth. The effects of O2 concentration in the rooting zone on crop growth have long been studied, particularly in waterlogged soil, e.g., [14] and in soilless culture, e.g., [15]. A decrease in soil O2 concentration inhibits plant growth. The O2 concentration in cultivated soil is typically 18–21% and seldom approaches the critical value below which plant growth is suppressed under adequate soil moisture conditions. In many plant species, O2 deficiency in the root environment induces root injuries and growth inhibition. However, root elongation of many plant species is generally maintained at normal rates in solution culture experiments even at oxygen partial pressures as low as 100 hPa (approximately 10%), roughly half the atmospheric oxygen concentration [16]. Mechanisms by which many plant species adapt to low soil oxygen availability through changes in root morphology, anatomy, and architecture, such as aerenchyma formation, to maintain root system functioning have been elucidated [17].
The effects of CO2 concentration in the rooting zone on crop growth have also long been studied. For example, corn and soybeans were reported to grow well even at a CO2 concentration of 20% [18,19]. No difference was observed in growth between tobacco plants grown under 20% and 0% CO2 at 1% O2 [20]. However, barley and pea growth was suppressed even at 2% CO2 [21]. Whether these differences are due to the crop species or the experimental methods used remains unclear. Further investigation, including mechanistic studies, is required to address this issue. On the other hand, elevated rooting zone CO2 enhanced leaf area, shoot and root productivities in aeroponically grown lettuce plants [22].
Other studies have demonstrated the adverse effects of elevated soil CO2 on plant growth. Lake et al. (2017) reported that the biomass of beet storage root showed a greater loss and more severe water stress under CO2 elevation than O2 depletion in the rooting zone [23]. High CO2 on roots reduced the growth of chickpea and faba bean [24]. The root biomass of creeping bentgrass decreased when soil CO2 concentrations exceeded 2.5% [25]. Elevated soil CO2 concentrations between 0.5% and 2% suppress the growth of cucumber [26], bamboo [27], and carrot [28]. Sweet potato growth was also suppressed when soil CO2 concentrations rose from 0.5% to 2% [29,30]. Bouma et al. (1997) [31] reported that the growth of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) was unaffected by soil CO2 concentrations ranging from 0.06% to 2%. High CO2 on roots inhibited root respiration and root extension and suppressed growth [22]. In addition, a reduction in respiration of pear fruit cells was indicated through an inhibitory effect of CO2 on phosphofructokinase activity in the glycolytic pathway [23]. Information on the effects of elevated soil CO2 on plant growth, particularly tuberous root development, in cultivated fields remains insufficient. In contrast, their productivity was increased by placing rice or wheat straws, rice husk charcoal, and porous plastic pipes into soil ridges to promote soil aeration and thus decrease CO2 concentrations in the rooting zone in wet lowland conditions [32,33].
I have hypothesized that lowered CO2 concentrations in the rooting zone by forced soil ventilation lead to growth promotion, particularly tuberous root yields, in sweet potato. In this study, the effects of CO2 concentration in the rooting zone on the net photosynthetic rate and leaf conductance in sweet potato were investigated to clarify the dynamics of leaf gas exchange inhibition as a cause of growth suppression by elevated soil CO2. Furthermore, I verified that even a 1–2% reduction in CO2 concentration in the rooting zone by forced aeration with atmospheric air effectively promotes sweet potato growth and increases the yield.

2. Materials and Methods

Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L., cv. Kokei No. 14) plants were used in a series of experiments. Nursery plants were established from cuttings of scions with 5 leaves and fresh weight of 18 g per cutting, and the rooted plants with 7 leaves per plant and a uniform appearance were transplanted 10 days later. The experiment was conducted at the experimental farm of Osaka Metropolitan University (34°32′ N, 135°30′ E).

2.1. Experiment on the Effects of CO2 in the Rooting Zone on the Net Photosynthetic Rate and Leaf Conductance

The net photosynthetic rate and leaf conductance as an indicator of the transpiration rate in sweet potato leaves were investigated over 42 days.
Sweet potato was cultivated in containers (0.45 × 0.3 × 0.2 m3 each) filled with sand soil (Figure 1) and placed in a greenhouse in mid-April. Fresh atmospheric air containing 21% O2 and 0.04% CO2 was forced into each cultivation container through its bottom for one week after planting. Three containers were used for each treatment, and six plants were grown in each container. Two weeks after planting, air containing 1% and 2% CO2, and atmospheric air (0.04% CO2) as a control was forced from the bottom of each container into the soil to achieve varying CO2 concentrations in the rooting zone. To prevent drying due to forced aeration, the air was saturated with water vapor by passing it through a water tower, as shown in Figure 1. For irrigation and fertilization, a 1/2-concentration solution of standard Otsuka House No. 1 and No. 2 was used as a nutrient solution. The solution was supplied at 1 L d−1 for each cultivation container.
The net photosynthetic rate was measured using a photosynthesis system (Li-6400, Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Leaf conductance was measured using a porometer (Li-1600, Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Measurements were performed every 2–3 days after the plants were transferred from the cultivation greenhouse to an environmentally controlled chamber. The chamber was maintained at an air temperature of 23 °C, a relative humidity of 75%, a CO2 concentration of 0.04%, and a photosynthetic photon flux density of 300 μmol m−2 s−1. The measurement conditions were the average conditions for a typical sweet potato cultivation period in Japan.
To measure the gas exchange rates, the 3rd- and 4th-position leaves from 6 individual plants were used in each treatment. The cultivation container was the experimental unit in the statistical analysis. The average value from each of three containers for each treatment was used as one of the three samples for the significance test. Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test at p < 0.05.

2.2. Experiment on the Effect of Forced Aeration on Sweet Potato Growth in Cultivation Ridges

This study examined the growth of sweet potato grown in soil ridges with forced aeration and compared it with that grown in ridges with non-forced aeration. The relatively long-term effects of forced aeration on sweet potato growth were investigated by cultivating on ridges in loamy soil. The length, width, and height of each ridge were 10, 0.5, and 0.2 m, respectively. For fertilization, 200 g of compound fertilizer (8.0% ammonium nitrogen, 8.0% water-soluble phosphate, and 8.0% water-soluble potassium) was mixed into the soil per meter of ridge length. Each nursery plant was planted 0.5 m apart. The experimental cultivation period was 111 days from mid-May to late August.
Atmospheric air was forced into the soil using an air pump and porous pipes to reduce CO2 concentrations in the rooting zone (Figure 2a). The forced-aeration air was saturated with water vapor by passing it through the water. The four ridges were used in the cultivation experiment. Half of each ridge was forcedly aerated to ensure uniform light conditions for each treatment area, and the other half was not forcedly aerated as a control (Figure 2b). To prevent edge effects, other cultivation ridges were established around the experimental ridges. The conditions for each experimental ridge, including the management conditions, were uniform. The forced-aeration treatment was initiated 2 weeks after planting. At that time, the stem length was 30 cm, and the number of unfolded leaves was 10.
A plastic porous pipe (13 mm in diameter) was buried at a depth of 0.2 m in the center of each ridge, and fresh air was forced into the soil to decrease the soil CO2 concentration. The airflow rate per meter of ridge length was 1 L min−1. To prevent drying due to forced aeration, the air was humidified in a water tower until saturated with water vapor, then sent into the soil ridges, as shown in Figure 2a.
For the analysis of soil gas composition, soil gas samples were collected using soil air sampling tubes and syringes (Figure 2a) placed at depths of 1, 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm from the soil surface at the center of the ridge. These points were in a zone with relatively abundant roots. Each sample volume was 1 mL. The CO2 and O2 in the sample gases were analyzed using gas chromatography (Model 633, Hitachi Co., Tokyo, Japan). Measurements were performed 30, 41, 52, 61, 72, and 90 days after the start of the experiment.
To measure growth parameters, 10 individual plants from each of the four ridges were used in each treatment. The cultivation ridge was the experimental unit in the statistical analysis. The average value from each of four ridges for each treatment was used as one of the four samples for the significance test. The average of these values was used as the sample data for each treatment group for the significance test. The significant difference in each growth parameter between the two treatments with and without forced aeration were determined using Student’s t-test at p < 0.05.

2.3. Experiment on the Effect of Forced-Aeration Airflow Rates on Sweet Potato Growth in Cultivation Ridges

The same type of ridges as those shown in Figure 2 were used in this experiment. The experimental ridges were set up with airflow rates of 1.25 and 2.5 L min−1 per meter of ridge length, and a non-forced aeration ridge was used as a control. For the analysis of soil gas composition, soil gases were collected in the same manner as shown in Figure 2a. Each forced-aeration treatment was initiated 2 weeks after planting. At that time, the stem length was 30 cm, and the number of unfolded leaves was 10. The experimental cultivation period was 69 days from early August to mid-October.
To measure growth parameters, 10 individual plants from each of the four ridges were used in each treatment. The cultivation ridge was the experimental unit in the statistical analysis. The average value from each of four ridges for each treatment was used as one of the four samples for the significance test. Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test at p < 0.05.

2.4. Experiment on the Effect of Forced-Aeration Time Intervals in the Rooting Zone on Sweet Potato Growth

The sweet potato was cultivated in containers (1 × 1 × 0.3 m3) filled with a loamy soil-vermiculite mixture (volume ratio 1:1) and placed in a greenhouse. Each treatment had three containers. Each forced-aeration treatment was initiated 2 weeks after planting. The experimental cultivation period was 60 days from early July to early September.
The rooting zone was forcedly aerated from the bottom of each container using air pumps (Figure 3). The forced-aeration air was saturated with water vapor by passing it through water at an aeration rate of 10 L min−1 per cultivation container. This forced aeration rate was determined based on the results of the field experiment using the Ridges mentioned above. Time intervals of 4 and 24 h were applied, and continuously forced-aeration and non-forced-aeration ridges were established as controls. To prevent drying due to forced aeration, the air was humidified in a water tower until saturated with water vapor, then sent into the soil ridges, as shown in Figure 3. Three containers were used for each treatment, with 10 plants grown in each container.
For fertilization, 500 g of the compound fertilizer mentioned in Section 2.2 was mixed into the soil before transplanting. Irrigation was performed daily until the 16th day after planting and every two days thereafter. The amount of water supplied each time was 10 L per cultivation container to achieve the field water capacity when irrigating.
This experiment was a simulation test in which the leaves were harvested appropriately, assuming that they would be used as vegetables in greenhouse cultivation, so the experiment was limited to investigating the effect of rooting zone CO2 on tuberous root growth. The cultivation container was the experimental unit in the statistical analysis. To measure the tuberous root yield, 10 individual plants from each of the three containers were used in each treatment. The average value from each of three containers for each treatment was used as one of the three samples for the significance test. Statistical analysis was conducted using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of CO2 in the Rooting Zone on Net Photosynthetic Rate and Leaf Conductance

The net photosynthetic rate of sweet potato under forced aeration with fresh air (control) remained almost constant for 34 days from day 2 to day 35 after treatment initiation. The net photosynthetic rate decreased by 20% 4 days after treatment initiation when the rooting zone was forcedly aerated with 1% CO2. The net photosynthetic rate decreased by 20% 2 days after treatment initiation when forced with 2% CO2. The net photosynthetic rate for both treatments decreased to 70% of the initial rate after 35 days. The conductance showed the same trend of the net photosynthetic rate. The values for both high-CO2 treatments decreased to 60% of their initial values.
Figure 4 shows the mean values of net photosynthetic rate and leaf conductance for sweet potato leaves from day 4 to day 35 after the start of the treatments. The mean net photosynthetic rates were 17.1, 14.0, and 12.7 µmol m−2 s−1 for the control, 1% CO2, and 2% CO2, respectively. The mean net photosynthetic rates for both elevated CO2 treatments were 82% and 74% of that in the control. As an indicator of transpiration rate, leaf conductance showed the same trend as the net photosynthetic rate. The mean leaf conductance over 35 days was 0.20, 0.14, and 0.13 m s−1 for the control, 1% CO2, and 2% CO2, respectively, indicating that the mean leaf conductance for both elevated CO2 treatments was approximately 70% and 65% of that in the control, respectively.

3.2. Effect of Forced Aeration in the Rooting Zone on Sweet Potato Growth

Figure 5 shows the distributions of CO2 concentrations in dry and wet soil ridges before and after rainfall. Most of the sweet potato roots were distributed within this measurement range. The dry ridge surface was relatively dry, and the water potential measured with a tensiometer at a depth of 10 cm in the center of the ridge was −0.062 MPa. The water potential for the wet ridge was −0.006 MPa.
The CO2 concentrations in the non-forced aeration ridge increased with depth (Figure 5B,D). The CO2 concentrations were higher, and the change in CO2 concentration with distance from the aeration pipe was more drastic when the soil was wetted by rainfall than when it was dry (Figure 5). When the soil was relatively dry, the CO2 concentration was 0.2% and 0.7% at depths of 5 and 15 cm, respectively, at the center of the non-aeration ridge (Figure 5B). The CO2 concentration in the forced aeration ridge was almost uniformly 0.2–0.3%, even at a depth of 15 cm (Figure 5A). The CO2 concentrations in the wet ridges were higher than those in the dry ridges (Figure 5C,D). Forced aeration significantly reduced CO2 concentrations. For example, at a depth of 15 cm in the center of the ridge, the CO2 concentration decreased to 0.4% for the aeration ridge (Figure 5C) from 1.2% for the non-forced aeration ridge (Figure 5D). Thus, forced aeration appeared to have a greater influence on CO2 reduction, especially when the soil was wet.
Figure 6 shows the cultivation landscape at the end of the experimental period and the root system just before the harvest survey. The rooting system, including tuberous roots, exhibited visibly vigorous growth in the forced aeration ridge compared with that in the non-forced aeration ridge.
Figure 7 shows the effect of forced aeration on the growth characteristics of sweet potato grown for 111 days. The fresh weights of foliage and tuberous roots in the forced-aeration ridge were 21% and 18% higher than those in the non-forced-aeration ridge, respectively. The dry weights of foliage and tuberous roots in the forced aeration ridge were 28% and 19% higher than those in the non-forced aeration ridge. Thus, when the soil was forcedly aerated at the rate of 1 L min−1 per meter of ridge length, the yield of tuberous roots was approximately 1.2 times higher than that in the non-forced aeration.

3.3. Effect of Forced Aeration Airflow Rates on Sweet Potato Growth in Cultivation Ridges

The CO2 concentration tended to increase with increasing distance from the soil surface in the non-forced aeration ridge (Figure 8). In the ridge forcedly aerated with atmospheric air at the rate of 1.25 L min−1, the CO2 concentration was higher at depths of 5–10 cm than at depths of 15–20 cm. At a depth of 15 cm, the CO2 concentrations in the non-forced aeration (control), 1.25 L min−1, and 2.5 L min−1 treatments ranged from 0.5% to 1.4%, 0.2% to 0.3%, and 0.1% to 0.2%, respectively. The CO2 concentrations decreased as the aeration rate increased. At the ridge, forcedly aerated at 2.5 L min−1, the CO2 concentration was lowest at every depth.
Figure 9 shows the growth characteristics of sweet potatoes treated with different forced-aeration rates. The dry weight of tuberous roots at aeration rates of 1.25 and 2.5 L min−1 was 19% and 26% higher than that of the control. The fresh weight of foliage (leaves and stems) at the rate of 2.5 L min−1 was also 26% higher than that of the control. Sweet potato growth was promoted when forced aeration reduced the CO2 in the ridge.

3.4. Effects of Forced-Aeration Time Intervals in the Rooting Zone on Sweet Potato Growth

Figure 10 shows an example of the daily change in soil CO2 concentration in each treatment 12 days after the initiation of forced-aeration treatment. Each value represents the average CO2 concentration at depths of 5, 10, and 15 cm. After irrigation at 11:00, the CO2 concentration in the non-forced aeration soil increased by 0.5% from 1.1% to 1.6%, then gradually decreased. In contrast, forced aeration lasted for 15 min at 13:00 in the 24 hourly forced-aeration treatment; thus, the increase in CO2 concentration due to irrigation was limited to 0.15%. A significant decrease in CO2 concentration was observed in the 4-h forced aeration treatment. In continuous forced-aeration treatment, changes in daily CO2 concentration were almost negligible. The average daily CO2 concentrations were 1.2%, 0.8%, 0.5%, and 0.1% in the non-forced-aeration treatment, 24-hourly forced-aeration treatment, 4-hourly forced-aeration treatment, and continuous forced-aeration treatment, respectively. The shorter the forced-aeration interval, the higher the increase in soil CO2 concentration.
In this experiment, sweet potato plants were cultivated with a leaf number of 10 per plant; therefore, differences in aboveground dry weight between treatments are unclear. Figure 11 shows the growth characteristics of sweet potato treated with different forced-aeration intervals. Forced-aeration increased by 24%, 27%, and 40% compared with the non-forced-aeration treatment for the 24-hourly, 4-hourly, and continuous forced-aeration treatments, respectively. The shorter the forced-aeration interval and the lower the soil CO2 concentration, the higher the tuberous root yield of sweet potato. Forced aeration for 15 min once a day was found to maintain low soil CO2 concentrations and effectively promote sweet potato growth.

4. Discussion

The O2 concentration in the rooting zone was 19–20% throughout this study. Decreased soil O2 concentration inhibits the growth of many plant species. Rooting zone hypoxia and impaired gas exchange under elevated soil moisture strongly limit growth and productivity across horticultural crops [34]. Armstrong & Drew (2002) reviewed the effects of hypoxia on plants, noting that reduced oxygen availability inhibits root respiration, glycolysis, and energy production [35]. Decreasing O2 to 11% reduced in the rooting zone of beet reduced the photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance of leaves, and the total root biomass by 25%, 12%, 27%, and 55%, respectively, compared with controls [23]. O2 concentrations lower than 10% retard tuberous root formation in sweet potatoes, which can partly account for the poor performance of sweet potatoes in waterlogged soils [36].
Previous studies have qualitatively demonstrated the adverse effects of elevated soil CO2 on plant growth. Artificially increasing CO2 to 42% in the rooting zone of beet reduced the photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and total root biomass by 75%, 84%, 71%, and 73%, respectively, compared with controls [23]. The root biomass of creeping bentgrass decreased when soil CO2 concentrations exceeded 2.5% [18]. Elevated soil CO2 concentrations between 0.5% and 2% suppress the growth of bamboo [27] and carrot [28]. Sweet potato growth was also suppressed when soil CO2 concentrations increased from 0.5% to 2% [29,30].
High CO2 on roots inhibited root respiration and root extension of chickpea and faba bean [24]. Respiration in root tips declined substantially to 40–75% of the control at 8–20% CO2, with similar responses across the two species. The total sugar levels in the root tips of both species increased, indicating that the decline in respiration was not due to reduced substrate availability [24]. Consistently, in cell cultures of pear fruit, respiration was reduced by 25–40% on exposure to 15–20% CO2 on roots [34]. Fructose-6-phosphate accumulated, while fructose-1,6-bisphosphate levels and ATP and PPi phosphofructokinase activities declined in response to elevated CO2 on cells, indicating an inhibitory effect of CO2 on phosphofructokinase activity in the glycolytic pathway and, thus, a reduction in respiration. Regarding metabolism, a 10% increase in CO2 would increase cytoplasmic HCO3 by 75–90 mM and affect pH-maintenance systems, indicating adverse effects on respiration when cytoplasmic HCO3 rises [37]. Although CO2 concentrations in previous studies were higher than those in this study, their physiological effects may partially explain the adverse effects of elevated CO2 in the rooting zone observed in this study.
Soil moisture conditions affect sweet potato growth throughout the growing season [38]. The effects of flooding on the growth of several field crops, including sweet potato, and the harmful effects of waterlogging on sweet potato tubers were examined [39]. The literature on the effects of excess soil moisture on sweet potato performance is limited. Pardales and Escalante (1978) [40] reported that tuber formation is highly dependent on the soil water table, with shallow water tables resulting in fewer marketable tubers. The yield of sweet potato tuber decreased when the irrigation water was excessive [41]. Increased soil aeration through the insertion of plastic porous pipes into the soil ridges to reduce CO2 concentrations under an excess soil moisture condition in very moist soil improved the tuberous root biomass production to four times that observed in soil without porous pipes [27], indicating that soil aeration can considerably affect the tuberous root formation of sweet potato, especially under wet soil conditions.
Soil CO2 is generated mainly by root respiration and soil microbial respiration. The CO2 concentrations were higher, and the decrease in CO2 concentration with forced aeration was more significant when the soil was wet than when it was dry (Figure 5). The CO2 concentration in the soil decreased rapidly due to the irrigation-induced increase in the gaseous diffusion coefficient. Then it decreased very slowly because of the slow recovery of the coefficient [42]. Therefore, forced aeration is more effective in reducing the CO2 concentration in wetter soil.
The leaf conductance decreased by 30% as the soil CO2 concentration increased to 2% (Figure 4). It is estimated that transpiration is suppressed as the CO2 concentration in the rooting zone increases. There is also generally a positive relationship between the net photosynthetic rate and leaf conductance. The net photosynthetic rate decreased by 20% as the CO2 concentration increased to 1–2% in the soil (Figure 4). This means that increased CO2 in the rooting zone would also suppress photosynthesis in leaves and, thus, plant biomass production. Consequently, soil water content can be manipulated to control soil gas composition.
In the experiment described in Section 2.4, the number of leaves was limited to 10, assuming that the shoots would be harvested over time for food. This artificial treatment is thought to affect nutritional responses, especially the allocation of photosynthates, and rooting zone CO2 has a more pronounced effect on tuberous root growth. In this experiment, forced aeration for 15 min once a day increased the sweet potato yield by 24% (Figure 11). Therefore, if the production cost budget allows, tuberous root yields are expected to rise when intermittent forced aeration is combined with air pumps and solar power generation From the perspective of commercialization and scalability, further study is needed to determine feasibility and long-term sustainability, particularly regarding issues related to energy, initial costs, and maintenance costs, through economic and energy-use analyses.
In this study, the sweet potato cultivar ‘Kokei No. 14’ was used. The cultivar and its derivatives are popular in Japan, with a cultivated area of approximately 8200 hectares, accounting for approximately 20% of the total sweet potato cultivation in Japan. It grows quickly, can be harvested approximately 100 days after planting, and has good storage properties. The effect of CO2 in the rooting zone of sweet potato on its growth may differ among varieties; therefore, further tests on widely cultivated varieties are necessary under the local environmental conditions. In addition, each experimental result in this study are based on experiments conducted in a single field or on a single type of substrate for a single season. To be definitive, the results would require multiple years or multiple seasons of replication. Furthermore, it would be necessary to examine different soil physical properties and management conditions, such as fertilization and watering. To extend the results of this study, further verification under various conditions with various cultivars is desirable.

5. Conclusions

Forced aeration into the rooting zone could decrease CO2 concentrations and increase the sweet potato yield by 20%. Sweet potato yield can be increased by forced aeration for 15 min per day. This would prevent growth inhibition caused by elevated rooting zone CO2 concentrations, even at 0.5–2%.

Funding

Other than the regular operating expenses from my institution, I received no funding from any other source.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics 2025: Monitoring Health for the SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  2. Truong, V.D.; Avula, R.Y.; Pecota, K.V.; Yencho, G.C. Sweetpotato production, processing, and nutritional quality. In Handbook of Vegetables and Vegetable Processing; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 811–838. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alam, M.K. A comprehensive review of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam): Revisiting the associated health benefits. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 115, 512–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tedesco, D.; de Almeida Moreira, B.R.; Júnior, M.R.B.; Maeda, M.; da Silva, R.P. Sustainable management of sweet potatoes: A review on practices, strategies, and opportunities in nutrition-sensitive agriculture, energy security, and quality of life. Agric. Syst. 2023, 210, 103693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. van Jaarsveld, P.J.; Faber, M.; Tanumihardjo, S.A.; Nestel, P.; Lombard, C.J.; Benadé, A.J.S. β-Carotene–rich orange-fleshed sweet potato improves the vitamin A status of primary school children assessed with the modified-relative-dose-response test 1–3. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 81, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mounika, V.; Gowd, T.Y.M.; Lakshminarayana, D.; Krishna, G.V.; Reddy, I.V.; Soumya, B.K.; Reddy, P.M. Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam): A comprehensive review of its botany, nutritional composition, phytochemical profile, health benefits, and future prospects. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2025, 251, 3225–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Motsa, N.M.; Modi, A.T.; Mabhaudhi, T. Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) as a drought tolerant and food security crop. South Afr. J. Sci. 2015, 111, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Woolfe, J.A. Sweet Potato: An Untapped Food Resource; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nguyen, H.C.; Chen, C.C.; Lin, K.H.; Chao, P.Y.; Lin, H.H.; Huang, M.Y. Bioactive compounds, antioxidants, and health benefits of sweet potato leaves. Molecules 2021, 26, 1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Amagloh, F.C.; Yada, B.; Tumuhimbise, G.A.; Amagloh, F.K.; Kaaya, A.N. The potential of sweet potato as a functional food in sub-Saharan Africa and its implications for health: A review. Molecules 2021, 26, 2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Islam, S. Sweetpotatoes [Ipomoea batatas (L.) lam]: The super food of the Next Century? An intensive review on their potential as a sustainable and versatile food source for future generations. CyTA-J. Food 2024, 22, 2397553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ishiguro, K.; Yoshimoto, M. Content of the eye-protective nutrient lutein in sweet potato leaves. Acta Hortic. 2006, 703, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, C.; Liu, D.; Wu, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Wu, W. Chemical characterization and antioxidant properties of ethanolic extract and its fractions from sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) leaves. Foods 2019, 9, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Parent, C.; Capelli, N.; Berger, A.; Crèvecoeur, M.; Dat, J.F. An overview of plant responses to soil waterlogging. Plant Stress 2008, 2, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  15. Morard, P.; Silvestre, J. Plant injury due to oxygen deficiency in the root environment of soilless culture: A review. Plant Soil 1996, 184, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Drew, M.C. Oxygen Deficiency and Root Metabolism: Injury and Acclimation under Hypoxia and Anoxia. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1997, 48, 223–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pedersen, O.; Sauter, M.; Colmer, T.D.; Nakazono, M. Regulation of root adaptive anatomical and morphological traits during low soil oxygen. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Grable, A.R.; Danielson, R.E. Effect of carbon dioxide, oxygen, and soil moisture suction on germination of corn and soybeans. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1965, 29, 12–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grable, A.R.; Danielson, R.E. Influence of CO2 on growth of corn and soybean seedlings. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1965, 29, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Williamson, R.E. Effect of Soil Gas Composition and Flooding on Growth of Nicotiana tabacum L. Agron. J. 1970, 62, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Geisler, G. Interactive effects of CO2 and O2 in soil on root and top growth of barley and peas. Plant Physiol. 1967, 42, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, J.; Austin, P.T.; Nichols, M.A.; Lee, S.K. Elevated root-zone CO2 protects lettuce plants from midday depression of photosynthesis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lake, J.A.; Steven, M.D.; Smith, K.L.; Lomax, B.H. Plant responses to elevated CO2 levels in soils: Distinct CO2 and O2-depletion effects. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2017, 64, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Munir, R.; Konnerup, D.; Khan, H.A.; Siddique, K.H.; Colmer, T.D. Sensitivity of chickpea and faba bean to root-zone hypoxia, elevated ethylene, and carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bunnell, B.T.; McCarty, L.B.; Hill, H.S. Soil gas, temperature, matric potential, and creeping bentgrass growth response to subsurface air movement on a sand-based golf green. HortScience 2004, 39, 415–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kitaya, Y.; Yabuki, K.; Kiyota, M. Studies on the control of gaseous environment in the rhizosphere. (2) Effect of carbon dioxide in the rhizosphere on the growth of cucumber. J. Agric. Meteorol. 1984, 40, 119–124, (In Japanese with English abstract, tables, and figures). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  27. Wei, X.; Kitaya, Y.; Shibuya, T.; Kiyota, M. Effects of soil gas composition on transpiration and leaf conductance of bamboos. J. Agric. Meteorol. 2005, 60, 845–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  28. Islam, A.F.M.S.; Kitaya, Y.; Hirai, H.; Yanase, M.; Mori, G.; Kiyota, M. Growth characteristics and yield of carrots grown in a soil ridge with a porous tube for soil aeration in a wet lowland. Sci. Hortic. 1998, 77, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Islam, A.F.M.S.; Kitaya, Y.; Hirai, H.; Yanase, M.; Mori, G.; Kiyota, M. Growth characteristics and yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) grown by a modified hydroponic cultivation method under field conditions in a wet lowland. Environ. Control Biol. 1997, 35, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Siqynbatu, S.; Kitaya, Y.; Hirai, H.; Endo, R.; Shibuya, T. Effects of water contents and CO2 concentrations in soil on growth of sweet potato. Field Crops Res. 2013, 152, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bouma, T.J.; Nielsen, K.L.; Eissenstat, D.M.; Lynch, J.P. Soil CO2 concentration does not affect growth or root respiration in bean or citrus. Plant Cell Environ. 1997, 20, 1495–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Islam, A.F.M.S.; Kitaya, Y.; Hirai, H.; Yanase, M.; Mori, G.; Kiyota, M. Effects of placing rice straw, wheat straw, and rice husks in soil ridges on growth, morphological characteristics, and yield of sweet potato in wet lowlands. J. Agric. Meteorol. 1997, 53, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Islam, A.F.M.S.; Kitaya, Y.; Hirai, H.; Yanase, M.; Mori, G.; Kiyota, M. Sweet potato cultivation with rice husk charcoal as a soil aerating material under wet lowland field conditions. Environ. Control Biol. 1998, 36, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fanourakis, D.; Tsaniklidis, G.; Makraki, T.; Nikoloudakis, N.; Bartzanas, T.; Sabatino, L.; Fatnassi, H.; Ntatsi, G. Climate Change Impacts on Greenhouse Horticulture in the Mediterranean Basin: Challenges and Adaptation Strategies. Plants 2025, 14, 3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Armstrong, W.; Drew, M.C. Root growth and metabolism under oxygen deficiency. In Plant Roots; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2002; pp. 1139–1187. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kerbel, E.L.; Kader, A.A.; Romani, R.J. Respiratory and glycolytic response of suspension-cultured ‘Passe Crassane’ pear fruit cells to elevated CO2 concentrations. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1990, 115, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Watanabe, K.; Ozaki, K.; Yashiki, T. Studies on the Effects of Soil Physical Conditions on the Growth and Yield of Crop Plants: VII. Effects of soil air composition and soil bulk density and their interaction on the growth of sweet potato. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 1968, 37, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Greenway, H.; Armstrong, W.; Colmer, T.D. Conditions leading to high CO2 (>5 kPa) in waterlogged-flooded soils and possible effects on root growth and metabolism. Ann. Bot. 2006, 98, 9–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Wang, J.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, M. The research on the physiological responses of sweet potato to waterlogging stress at different growth stages and their mechanisms affecting yield formation. Adv. Resour. Res. 2025, 5, 2039–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pardales, J.R., Jr.; Escalante, M.C. The effect of various water table depths on the growth and yield of sweet potato. Philipp. J. Crop Sci. 1978, 3, 58–59. [Google Scholar]
  41. Thompson, P.G.; Smittle, D.A.; Hall, M.R. Relationship of sweetpotato yield and quality to amount of irrigation. HortScience 1992, 27, 23–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kitaya, Y.; Yabuki, K. Studies on the Control of Gaseous Environment in the rhizosphere. (1) Changes in CO2 concentration and gaseous diffusion coefficient in soils after illigation. J. Agric. Meteorol. 1984, 40, 1–7, (In Japanese with English abstract, tables, and figures). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Outline of the experimental cultivation system with forced aeration into the rooting zone with different CO2 concentrations of air.
Figure 1. Outline of the experimental cultivation system with forced aeration into the rooting zone with different CO2 concentrations of air.
Agronomy 16 00114 g001
Figure 2. Overview of the aeration and soil gas sampling methods for each cultivation ridge to examine the effect of forced aeration on sweet potato growth. (a) Forced aeration and soil gas sampling methods for each cultivation ridge. (b) Layout of cultivation ridges.
Figure 2. Overview of the aeration and soil gas sampling methods for each cultivation ridge to examine the effect of forced aeration on sweet potato growth. (a) Forced aeration and soil gas sampling methods for each cultivation ridge. (b) Layout of cultivation ridges.
Agronomy 16 00114 g002
Figure 3. Outline of the experimental cultivation system with forced aeration into the rooting zone at different time intervals.
Figure 3. Outline of the experimental cultivation system with forced aeration into the rooting zone at different time intervals.
Agronomy 16 00114 g003
Figure 4. Effects of CO2 in the rooting zone on mean values of net photosynthetic rate and leaf conductance for sweet potato leaves from 4 to 35 days after the start of the treatments. Mean values ± S.D. with the same letter are not significantly different based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05 (n = 3).
Figure 4. Effects of CO2 in the rooting zone on mean values of net photosynthetic rate and leaf conductance for sweet potato leaves from 4 to 35 days after the start of the treatments. Mean values ± S.D. with the same letter are not significantly different based on analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05 (n = 3).
Agronomy 16 00114 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of CO2 concentrations in dry (A,B) and wet (C,D) soil ridges with and without forced aeration. Black dots in the figure indicate the points where sample soil gases were collected.
Figure 5. Distribution of CO2 concentrations in dry (A,B) and wet (C,D) soil ridges with and without forced aeration. Black dots in the figure indicate the points where sample soil gases were collected.
Agronomy 16 00114 g005
Figure 6. Photographs of the experimental field and tuberous roots in ridges forcedly and non-forcedly aerated.
Figure 6. Photographs of the experimental field and tuberous roots in ridges forcedly and non-forcedly aerated.
Agronomy 16 00114 g006
Figure 7. Effects of forced aeration on sweet potato growth. Mean values ± S.D. with the same letter are not significantly different based on Student’s t-test at p < 0.05 (n = 4).
Figure 7. Effects of forced aeration on sweet potato growth. Mean values ± S.D. with the same letter are not significantly different based on Student’s t-test at p < 0.05 (n = 4).
Agronomy 16 00114 g007
Figure 8. Profiles of CO2 concentrations in soil with non-forced aeration and airflow rates of 1.25 and 2.5 L min−1 per 1 m ridge length. Each plot represents the mean of the measurements taken on the four cultivation days. Error bars indicate the standard deviations (S.D.).
Figure 8. Profiles of CO2 concentrations in soil with non-forced aeration and airflow rates of 1.25 and 2.5 L min−1 per 1 m ridge length. Each plot represents the mean of the measurements taken on the four cultivation days. Error bars indicate the standard deviations (S.D.).
Agronomy 16 00114 g008
Figure 9. Effects of forced-aeration airflow rates on sweet potato growth. Mean values ± S.D. with the same letter are not significantly different based on ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05 (n = 4).
Figure 9. Effects of forced-aeration airflow rates on sweet potato growth. Mean values ± S.D. with the same letter are not significantly different based on ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05 (n = 4).
Agronomy 16 00114 g009
Figure 10. CO2 concentrations in each rooting zone without forced aeration (non-forced aeration), with forced aeration every 24 and 4 h, and with continuous forced aeration. Irrigation was conducted daily at 11 a.m.
Figure 10. CO2 concentrations in each rooting zone without forced aeration (non-forced aeration), with forced aeration every 24 and 4 h, and with continuous forced aeration. Irrigation was conducted daily at 11 a.m.
Agronomy 16 00114 g010
Figure 11. Effects of the time intervals of forced aeration in the rooting zone on sweet potato growth. Mean values ± S.D. with the same letter are not significantly different based on ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05 (n = 3).
Figure 11. Effects of the time intervals of forced aeration in the rooting zone on sweet potato growth. Mean values ± S.D. with the same letter are not significantly different based on ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test at p < 0.05 (n = 3).
Agronomy 16 00114 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kitaya, Y. Promotion of Sweet Potato Growth and Yield by Decreasing Soil CO2 Concentrations with Forced Aeration. Agronomy 2026, 16, 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010114

AMA Style

Kitaya Y. Promotion of Sweet Potato Growth and Yield by Decreasing Soil CO2 Concentrations with Forced Aeration. Agronomy. 2026; 16(1):114. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010114

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kitaya, Yoshiaki. 2026. "Promotion of Sweet Potato Growth and Yield by Decreasing Soil CO2 Concentrations with Forced Aeration" Agronomy 16, no. 1: 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010114

APA Style

Kitaya, Y. (2026). Promotion of Sweet Potato Growth and Yield by Decreasing Soil CO2 Concentrations with Forced Aeration. Agronomy, 16(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16010114

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop