Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Influences of Grassland Degradation on Soil Quality Through Different Minimum Data Sets in Southwest China
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Film-Mulching on Soil Evaporation and Plant Transpiration in a Soybean Field in Arid Northwest China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Fertilization Timing on Nitrogen Uptake in Spring Tea of Different Sprouting Phenological Cultivars: A Field Trial with 15N Tracing

1
Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology, Genetics and Breeding of Special Economic Animals and Plants, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hangzhou 310008, China
2
Tea Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
3
Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
4
Xihu National Agricultural Experimental Station for Soil Quality, Hangzhou 310008, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(5), 1090; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051090
Submission received: 22 March 2025 / Revised: 24 April 2025 / Accepted: 28 April 2025 / Published: 29 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Soil and Plant Nutrition)

Abstract

:
Applying a top dressing of nitrogen fertilizer before harvesting spring tea is vital for producing high-quality spring tea. However, the interaction between the sprouting phenological characteristics of various cultivars and the timing of top dressing remains unclear. A field trial was conducted to investigate such interaction. Urea enriched with 15N was applied to soil of the early-sprouting cultivar Jia-ming-1 (JM1) and the late-sprouting cultivar Tie-guan-yin (TGY) on 29 January (early application, EApp) or 10 March (late application, LApp), respectively. The bud density and yield of young spring shoots were significantly decreased in LApp compared to EApp. Such differences were more remarkable in the early-sprouting cultivar (JM1) than in the late-sprouting cultivar (TGY). The Ndff (N derived from 15N-enriched urea) in mature leaves and young spring shoots as well as the amount of 15N in young spring shoots were all higher in EApp than in LApp. Ndff in both mature leaves (R2 = 0.99, p < 0.001) and young spring shoots (R2 = 0.61–0.89, p < 0.01) could be well predicted by the growing degree days of the duration between the N fertilization and sampling. Ndff and 15N concentrations in mature leaves were significantly correlated with the content of nitrate and the ratio of ammonium to total inorganic nitrogen. Partial least squares path modeling revealed that thermal condition directly affected soil N supply and soil pH and thereby affected Ndff in mature leaves and young spring shoots. Our findings highlight the importance of early pre-spring topdressing of N fertilizer to improve the yield and N use efficiency of spring tea in both early- and late-sprouting tea cultivars. The work identified a synergistic effect of N uptake by tea plants, N transformation, and soil pH related to the thermo-conditions of early and late N topdressing.

1. Introduction

The tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.) is an important cash crop widely cultivated in subtropical and tropical regions. As a foliar plant, tea tree has a considerably higher nitrogen (N) requirement compared to other crops, due to its frequent harvesting and pruning practices throughout the growing cycle [1,2]. The N uptake in tea trees exhibits seasonal variability [3], with spring growth requiring more nutrients than summer or autumn [1,4]. Tea harvested in spring has high economic value due to the richness in flavor compounds caused largely by ample N nutrition [5,6]. Therefore, topdressing of inorganic N fertilizer before the harvesting of spring tea is an important practice which has been adopted in approximately 80% of tea plantations in China [7]. However, the timing of topdressing in tea production is highly discretionary and varies substantially [8]. Nutrient uptake by plants is directly affected by air and soil temperature through effects on root physiology in combination with soil-mediated controls on nutrient availability [9]. Different timing effects are related to differences in root growth, development stage, and storage and remobilization of nutrients among cultivars [10,11]. Our previous works showed that the uptake of topdressing N in spring tea was the highest when it was applied 50–60 days before the harvesting of young spring shoots and the timing effect was related to the thermal condition between the dates of fertilization and harvest of young shoots [12]. In response to the increasing temperature from winter to early and late spring, the spring budding dates of different tea cultivars vary by up to 40 days [13]. The temporal change in nutrient uptake in spring might also vary according to cultivars of different phenological characteristics in tea [14,15] and also other evergreen or deciduous trees [16,17]. On the other hand, soil N transformation processes, including nitrification, denitrification, mineralization, and immobilization, exhibit strong temperature dependence, as evidenced by previous studies [18,19,20,21]. These thermal sensitivities fundamentally regulate the spatiotemporal distribution of soil N pools, thereby influencing N availability for plant uptake and the temporal effectiveness of fertilization practices. Emerging evidence from cereal crop systems has demonstrated that maize N assimilation patterns are shaped by genotype-specific interactions with N-cycling processes, which are regulated by soil thermal and hydrological conditions during key phenological stages [22,23]. Notably, the thermo-regulated soil–plant N coupling mechanism remains poorly characterized in perennial woody crop systems. For spring tea, a critical knowledge gap persists in optimizing the timing of N fertilization to synchronize with both the plant’s endogenous nutrient demand rhythms and the dynamic patterns of soil N flux. This knowledge deficit is particularly consequential because the early spring growth of tea shoots, which determines both yield and quality, coincides with rapidly changing soil thermal conditions. Elucidating the complex interactions among genotypes, environmental factors, and management practices is essential for developing precision N fertilization strategies in tea cultivation systems.
In the present work, a field trial was conducted with the common early-sprouting cultivar ‘Jia-ming 1’ (JM1) and the common late-sprouting cultivar ‘Tie-guan-yin’ (TGY) by applying 15N-enriched urea at two times, i.e., 29 January (early application) or 10 March (late application). We hypothesized that (1) the N uptake of spring tea would respond differently to the timing of N fertilizer between the early- and late-sprouting cultivars, i.e., the late-sprouting cultivars would be less sensitive than the early cultivars to the topdressing timing; (2) the timing effect might be associated with soil properties and soil N transformation which changed accordingly alongside that of temperature. The N derived from 15N labeled fertilizer in plants and soil was subsequently measured. The purpose of the study was to identify the main factors influencing the uptake of fertilizer N in spring shoots and to ascertain whether the sprouting phenological characteristic of the tea cultivar affect the optimal timing N topdressing.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Description of the Field Site

The field experiment was conducted in a long-term field experiment investigating the interaction of tea cultivar and nitrogen fertilization at Shengzhou Experimental Station, which is located in Shaoxing, China (29°44′43″ N, 120°49′3″ E, 23 m a.s.l) (Figure 1). The plantation was established in 2015 with tea trees of different cultivars planted in a single row (0.33 m between bushes and 1.5 m between rows) at the same year. All cultivars received uniform field management including fertilization, pruning, irrigation and harvesting. Before the study, tea plants were fertilized with annual totals of 150 kg N ha−1, 90 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 120 K2O kg ha−1 of chemical fertilizers. Chemical N fertilizer (urea, 46% N) was applied three times, each in late February (45 kg N ha−1), May (30 kg N ha−1) and October (75 kg N ha−1). Phosphorus as calcium superphosphate and potassium as potassium sulfate were applied together with rapeseed cake manure (1200 kg ha−1) in October. All fertilizers were manually applied to ploughed furrows with a depth of 10–15 cm, along the edge of the tea canopy. The site is characterized by a subtropical humid climate with a mean annual temperature and rainfall of 16.4 °C and 1447 mm, respectively. The soil was classified as a granite-weathered red soil according to Chinese classification (Ultisols in US soil taxonomy), with a silt loam texture in the 0–30 cm soil layer. The soil had an initial pH (H2O) of 4.40, soil organic carbon of 11.1 g kg−1, total N (TN) of 0.93 g kg−1, total phosphorus of 0.52 g kg−1, total potassium of 8.97 g kg−1, alkali-hydrolyzed N of 173 mg kg−1, available phosphorus of 8.37 mg kg−1, available potassium of 111 mg kg−1, and bulk density of 1.22 g cm−3.

2.2. Experimental Design

Two cultivars, ‘Jia-ming 1’ (JM1) and ‘Tie-guan-yin’ (TGY), representing the early- and late-sprouting cultivars, respectively, were selected from ten cultivars [24] for this experiment with 15N labeling in 2021. A total of 8 bushes with visually uniform sizes were selected in two neighboring rows of tea plants for each cultivar, with each bush containing two plants as a micro-area with a total of 4 replicates. Each treatment was set up with 4 blocks, and each block contained two microplots, which were distributed in the same or different tea rows. Four plastic plates (4 mm thick, 40 cm high) were buried vertically at a depth of 35 cm to isolate a microplot (0.66 m × 1.5 m) containing two bushes (Figure 1). To avoid disturbing the soil in the microplot, narrow deep pits were dug according to the preset boundaries to place the separation board and slowly tap it into the preset depth. Each microplot received 15N-enriched urea (5.15 atom% 15N, purchased from Shanghai Research Institute of Chemical Industry Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) at a dose of 45 kg N ha−1 on one of the two dates: 29 January (early application, hereafter referred to as EApp) or 10 March (late application, hereafter referred to as LApp). Urea was mixed with the surface soil (5 cm deep) removed from the microplot and then evenly spread by hand back to the soil surface in the microplot. The two 15N-urea application times were randomly arranged to each cultivar. The management measures of tea trees in the microplot, except for the fertilization method which was changed from the local traditional manual shallow trench fertilization to mixing the fertilizer with the surface soil, were consistent with the local traditional field management measures, including fertilizer, fertilization rate, pruning, and harvesting.

2.3. Weather Recording

Air temperature and precipitation were measured in an automatic weather station (SP200, LSI-LASTEM, Milano, Italy) located about 100 m away from the experimental field. Soil temperatures at the surface and 20 cm depth were recorded using a tube probe (JZSX Corp., Beijing, China) installed in the field [24]. Growing degree days (GDDs) equal the value of the average daily temperature minus the base temperature (T0 = 8 °C).

2.4. Plant and Soil Sampling

Ten mature leaves on the surface of canopy were collected from every microplot after 0, 6, 12, and 30 days after 15N application and then oven-dried at 60 °C until reaching a constant weight. Young shoots consisting of one bud with one expanding leaf were harvested by hand in the subsequent spring. The harvesting of young shoots was started on 12 March (42 days and 2 days after EApp and LApp, respectively) and finished on 15 April totally in seven batches for the early-sprouting cultivar JM1 and started on 2 April (63 days and 23 days after EApp and LApp, respectively) and finished on 23 April totally for six batches of the late-sprouting cultivar TGY. The number of young shoots in each batch was used to determine the bud density of the plant. The samples of young shoots were treated in a microwave oven (800 W) for 2 min to inactivate the oxidase enzymes and then dried in an electric oven at 60 °C. Tea plants were pruned on 27 April at the height of 60 cm and the pruning litters were collected, divided into branches and leaves, and then oven-dried at 60 °C to a constant weight. All the sampled mature leaves, harvested young shoots, and pruned material were ground using a ball mill (MM400, Retsch, Duesseldorf, Germany) for the determination of N concentration and 15N abundance. In addition, representative young shoots of one bud with one leaf were collected at the peak of harvest, frozen in liquid N, stored in a −80 °C refrigerator, and crushed using a ball mill after vacuum freeze-drying to determine the content of quality components.
Soil samples were collected at four sites in each labeled microplot using an auger (Φ = 5 cm) from the 0–10 cm layer on the same day of mature leaves’ sampling and pruning. Four soil cores from the same plot were combined into one composite sample, passed through a 2 mm sieve, and then separated into two portions for further analysis. One portion was stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C for the determination of the contents of NH4+-N and NO3-N. Another portion was air-dried, passed through a 0.15 mm sieve, and finally oven-dried at 105 °C for the determination of the TN content and 15N abundance.

2.5. Measurements of 15N, Soil Properties and Tea Quality

Total N concentrations and the 15N abundance were determined using an elemental analyzer (EA, Flash 2000 HT, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) coupled (ConFlo IV, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS, Mat 253 Plus, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Inorganic N was extracted from the refrigerator stored fresh soil using 2 mol/L KCl (1:5, w/v) for 30 min. The concentrations of NH4+-N and NO3-N in the extract were determined using an automatic discontinuous chemical analyzer according to the user’s guide (Smartchem140, AMS Alliance, Frépillon, France).
The properties of the initial soil were determined according to the following methods. Air-dried soil sieved through a 2 mm sieve, and soil pH was determined by a pH meter (Orion 3 star, Thermo Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA) in a 1:2.5 solution (soil: deionized water, w/v); alkali-hydrolyzed N content was determined by diffusion of sodium hydroxide and acid titration; available phosphorus content was extracted with ammonium fluoride-hydrochloric acid and measured using a UV–visible spectrophotometer (TU-1901, Puxi Ltd., Beijing, China); available potassium content was extracted with ammonium acetate and an inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometer (Optima 8000, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The air-dried soil samples were sieved through a 0.15 mm sieve, and an element analyzer (Vario Max, Elementar, Langenselbold, Germany) was used to determine the SOC and TN contents.
The total free amino acid (FAA) and total polyphenol (TP) of young shoots were determined through the ninhydrin colorimetric method and ferrous tartrate colorimetric method using a spectrophotometer (UV-2550, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) [25].

2.6. Calculations and Statistics

2.6.1. Calculations

The N derived from the 15N-enriched urea (Ndff, %) in the plant sample was calculated as follows:
N d f f % = N 15   a t o m %   i n   s a m p l e t h e   n a t u r a l   N 15   a t o m %   i n   s a m p l e N 15   a t o m %   i n   u r e a t h e   n a t u r a l   N 15   a t o m % × 100
where the natural 15N atom% is 0.3663.
The 15N content in young shoots or pruned material was calculated by multiplying the biomass, Ndff, and N concentration of the plant organ:
N 15   c o n t e n t m g   p l o t 1 = N d f f % × N   c o n c e n t r a t i o n m g   g 1 × b i o m a s s g   p l o t 1 100

2.6.2. Statistical Analysis

T-tests were used to compare cultivars with the same sampling dates and fertilization dates for soil properties, mature leaves, and shoots’ dynamics analyses of N uptake. For the assessment of yield and N uptake efficiency, a post hoc LSD test was performed using a one-way ANOVA with the “stats” package. The effect of fertilization date and cultivar was tested using a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) with the “bruceR” package.
A correlation analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between Ndff in mature leaves and soil properties using the “ggcor” package. Quadratic regression was performed to describe the relationship between Ndff in mature leaves and that in young shoots with GDD using the “stats” package.
A partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) analysis was conducted using the R package “plspm” to investigate the causal relationships between latent variables influencing nitrogen uptake in tea plant shoots. The model incorporated four latent variables: (1) thermal condition, indirectly represented by growing degree days above 8 °C (GDDAir8 °C) accumulated during 12-day and 30-day periods post-fertilization; (2) soil N, assessed through total nitrogen (TN, 12 days post-fertilization), nitrogen derived from fertilizer (Ndff, 30 days post-fertilization), ammonium-N (NH4+-N, 30 days post-fertilization), and nitrate-N (NO3-N, 12 days post-fertilization); (3) soil pH, quantified as the mean pH value measured over 30 days after nitrogen application; and (4) Ndff in mature leaves, evaluated using Ndff of mature leaves at 12 and 30 days post-fertilization. Path relationships among these variables were analyzed to elucidate their direct and indirect effects.
In addition, the relationship among thermal condition, soil N, Ndff in mature leaves, and Ndff in all of the young spring shoots also was investigated using PLS-PM. In the pathway model, the latent variable “thermal condition” was reflected only by the manifest variable of GDD between fertilization and last harvest, which also was calculated using daily average air temperature with a threshold of 8 °C. The latent variable “soil N” was measured by TN (at 12 days after N application), NH4+-N (at 30 days after N application), NO3-N (at 12 days after N application), and the mean value of total inorganic nitrogen (TIN) between fertilization and pruning. The latent variable “soil pH” was measured by the mean soil pH value between fertilization and pruning. The latent variables “Ndff in mature leaf” and “Ndff in shoot” were measured by Ndff in mature leaves (at 12 and 30 days after N application) and Ndff in young spring shoots. Path coefficients represented the strength and direction of relationships between the variables. The goodness-of-fit of the model was assessed, considering that a value greater than 0.7 indicates a “good” and acceptable fit.
All the analyses in this study were conducted by R software (version 4.0.3).

3. Results

3.1. Temperature and Rainfall During the Experiment

During the experiment, the monthly mean air temperature increased from 5.5 °C in January to 17.1 °C in April (Figure 2A). The change in soil temperature followed a similar trend, albeit with less fluctuation (Figure 2A). The mean daily air temperature within 30 days after EApp was 10.3 °C and increased to 14.3 °C after LApp. The GDDs (Air, T0 = 8 °C) between the first harvest of young shoots and the day of EApp or LApp were 105 and 12 °C·d for JM1 and were 227 and 134 °C·d for TGY, respectively (Figure 2C). The GDDs between the last harvest of young shoot and the day of EApp or LApp were 328 and 235 °C·d for JM1 and were 415 and 322 °C·d for TGY, respectively (Figure 2C). Precipitation during the experiment mainly occurred in March, with monthly precipitation reaching 206.2 mm (Figure 2B). The rainfall between the first harvest of young shoot and the day of EApp or LApp was 130.6 and 9.8 mm for JM1 and was 279.8 and 159.0 mm for TGY, respectively. The rainfall between the last harvest of young shoot and the day of EApp or LApp was 325–330 and 204–209 mm for the two cultivars, respectively (Figure 2D).

3.2. Soil Properties

The content of NH4+-N in the topsoil increased rapidly to peaks after N application and then decreased to pre-fertilization levels by the end of the spring (Figure 3A). The NH4+-N content in EApp and LApp reached peak levels at 30 and 6 days, respectively, after N application for JM1. NH4+-N content for TGY reached the highest level 12 days after N application in both EApp and LApp. The soil NH4+-N content of JM1 was significantly lower than that of TGY on several sampling dates. The content of NO3-N increased significantly within 12 days for EApp and 30 days for LApp (Figure 3B). In both application timings, the content of NO3-N reached the highest levels at the end of harvest. The percentage of NO3-N/TIN decreased to its lowest levels 6 or 12 days after N application then increased until the last sampling (Figure 3C). The soil NO3-N content and its share in TIN were not different between the two cultivars on the specified sampling dates. In EApp, soil pH increased after 6 days and started to decrease 30 days after N topdressing (Figure 3D). In LApp, the soil pH increased only slightly after 6 days and thereafter decreased significantly.

3.3. 15N in Mature Leaves

The N concentration in mature leaves slightly decreased between late January and early April and increased after the last harvest of young shoots (Figure 4A). JM1 contained much higher N than TGY in mature leaves, and such differences were more marked in EApp than in LApp (Figure 4A). Within 30 days of N fertilization, the Ndff in mature leaves only slightly increased in EApp but substantially increased in LApp for both cultivars (Figure 4B). By the end of harvest, mature leaves’ Ndff increased considerably to 2.43–2.70% and 1.48–2.86%, respectively. Mature leaves’ Ndff between the EApp and LApp did not differ in JM1 but was significantly different in TGY. Ndff in mature leaves of JM1 increased with increasing GDD between the day of 15N application and the sampling dates, reached a maximum at GDD 365.4 °C·d, and no longer changed afterwards (Figure 4C). Ndff in mature leaves of TGY kept increasing with GDD. Nevertheless, their relations could be best described by quadratic regression (JM1: R2 = 0.99, p < 0.001, n = 7; TGY: R2 = 0.99, p < 0.0001, n = 9) (for JM1 excluding GDD beyond the maximum). Correlation analysis showed that within 30 days of 15N application, Ndff in mature leaves correlated positively with the NO3−-N content in the topsoil (r = 0.511, p < 0.001) and negatively with soil pH (r = −0.588, p < 0.001).

3.4. Dynamic Change in 15N in Young Spring Shoots

For the young shoots of tea trees, free amino acids (FAAs) and total polyphenols (TPs) are the main quality-related components, and the ratio of polyphenols to amino acids (TP/FAA) is an important biochemical index of fresh leaf quality. The type of cultivar had significant effects on the FAA and TP and TP/FAA of young spring shoots, but timing of N application only had significant effects on TP content for JM1. TP content in EApp was lower than that in LApp for JM1. 15N application date did not affect the quality of the TGY cultivars.
Compared to EApp, the density, yield and total N content of young spring shoots of JM1 were significantly decreased in LApp by 32.1%, 33.5% and 33.7%, respectively (Table 1). Similar differences were observed in TGY, but they were not statistically significant.
The Ndff of each harvest’s young shoots exhibited different trends between the two cultivars. TE Ndff of JM1 increased rapidly in the first three in EApp or five in LApp harvests and then slightly increased. Ndff of TGY remained rather stable at high levels in EApp and increased only slightly in LApp (Figure 5A). Ndff values were significantly higher in EApp than in LApp in the first three harvests for JM1 and in the first five harvests for TGY (Figure 5A). The Ndff of shoots could be described by quadratic regression against air GDD (T0 = 8 °C) between the day of 15N fertilization and harvest dates (JM1: R2 = 0.89, p < 0.0001, n = 14; TGY: R2 = 0.61, p < 0.01, n = 12) (Figure 5B). This indicates that GDD effectively predicted Ndff dynamics in young shoots of the JM1 cultivar, and predictive accuracy for TGY remained suboptimal when using GDD alone. However, integrating GDD with rainfall significantly enhanced the model’s robustness (R2 = 0.92, p < 0.0001).
15N content in young shoots of JM1 increased during the first three harvests and showed significant differences between the two application times (Figure 5C). Young shoot 15N content in JM1 peaked at the fourth harvest (around 30 March) and then decreased. Young shoot 15N content in TGY peaked at the first or second harvest (around 30 March), decreased from then on, and then increased again until the last harvest (23 April). It was noted that the change in 15N content between 30 March and 23 April coincided with the change in air temperature (Figure 5A).
Both the timing of N application and cultivar had significant effects on the total 15N content and average Ndff of young spring shoots (Table 1). The 15N content and Ndff in EApp were 45.5–50.8% and 18.0–35.3% higher than those in LApp. Shoot Ndff was significantly affected by the interaction between the application time and cultivar. The difference between EApp and LApp was smaller for JM1 than for TGY. Ndff and 15N contents were higher in TGY than in JM1, particularly for EApp (Table 1).

3.5. Ndff and 15N Content in Pruned Material

The total biomass, 15N content, and Ndff of pruned material (including twigs and leaves) were significantly decreased in LApp compared to EApp for TGY, whereas they remained unchanged for JM1 (Table 2). The Ndff of pruned material was significantly higher in JM1 compared to TGY under LApp.

3.6. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling

PLS-PM was constructed to assess the direct and indirect effects of the thermal conditions, soil N condition, and soil pH on Ndff in mature leaves (Figure 6A). These relationships represent the short-term effects of N topdressing. The results showed that soil pH had a direct negative effect on Ndff (path coefficient (pc) = −0.96, p < 0.001) (Figure 6B), whereas thermal condition was found to have indirect positive effects (indirect pc = 0.84) by controlling the soil’s N condition (pc = −0.86, p < 0.001) and pH (pc = −0.83, p < 0.001). Excluding the indirect effects, the path model explained 81% of the total variance in Ndff in mature leaves (goodness-of-fit: 0.82).
We constructed another PLS-PM model to assess the direct, indirect, and interactive effects of thermal conditions, soil N conditions, soil pH, and Ndff in mature leaves on Ndff in young spring shoots (Figure 6C). These relationships represent the long-term effects of N topdressing. The results showed that thermal conditions had direct positive effects on soil N condition (pc = 0.81, p < 0.001) and soil pH (pc = 0.74, p < 0.001). Ndff in young spring shoots was greatly and directly influenced by soil pH (pc = 0.90, p < 0.01) and Ndff in mature leaves (pc = 0.85, p < 0.01) (Figure 6D). Furthermore, Ndff in young spring shoots was indirectly influenced by the thermal condition (indirect pc = 0.69) and soil N condition (indirect pc = 0.45) (Figure 6D). Excluding the indirect effects, the path model explained 77% of the total variance in shoots’ Ndff (goodness-of-fit: 0.76, Figure 6C).

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of N Topdressing Timing on N in Young Spring Shoots of Early- and Late-Sprouting Cultivars

The timing of fertilizer application is a crucial factor influencing the N uptake and overall yield of spring tea [12,26]. In this study, we employed a microplot 15N-tracing field trial to evaluate the interaction between topdressing timing before spring tea harvesting and the sprouting characteristics of two tea cultivars with notably different sprouting dates (about 20 days apart). Our results indicated that the timing of topdressing markedly impacted the bud density, yield, N content, Ndff and 15N content of young spring shoots, as well as total biomass, Ndff, and 15N content of pruned material (Table 1 and Table 2). Late application of fertilizer consistently resulted in lower 15N absorption and Ndff compared to earlier applications, regardless of the cultivar’s sprouting characteristics. The finding confirms the importance of early N application in promoting N uptake and accumulation in spring teas [12,26]. The present work further confirmed previous findings that the uptake and allocation of pre-harvesting N topdressing in young shoots (Figure 5B) and also in mature leaves (Figure 4C) can be well described by growth degree days (GDDs) between the 15N application and the dates of harvesting or sampling, except for young shoots of TGY (R2 = 0.61). The Ndff of young shoots for TGY was significantly correlated with rainfall, and it could be better predicted by rainfall combined with GDDs. This is because soil water plays a decisive role in the N cycle through microbial activities (e.g., soil nitrification and mineralization), while also influencing plant physiological and metabolic processes (e.g., respiration, photosynthesis, nutrient uptake), hence affecting the N uptake and assimilation of plants and even their preference for different forms of N. Generally, increased moisture levels can enhance nutrient availability, root growth, and nutrient uptake, thereby promoting plant N use efficiency. However, excessive soil moisture inhibits N use efficiency, and studies have shown that excessive rainfall during the monsoon season leads to decreased tea yield [27].
Consistent with previous studies demonstrating cultivar-dependent N uptake linked to phenological traits [14,15], our findings reveal a phenology-mediated interaction between topdressing timing and Ndff in young spring shoots. Notably, delayed fertilization (LApp) induced a more pronounced reduction in Ndff in the late-sprouting cultivar TGY (35% decrease, Figure 5A) compared to the early-sprouting JM1 (18% decrease). This highlights that late-sprouting cultivars may be more sensitive to temporal variations in N fertilization, underscoring the importance of aligning topdressing schedules with cultivar-specific phenology to optimize nutrient utilization.
The even larger effect of LApp on Ndff was also observed in mature leaves and pruned material (Figure 3B and Table 2). These findings were contrary to our hypothesis that late-sprouting cultivars would be less sensitive than early ones to topdressing timing. The significant decline in Ndff of TGY with late application underscores the critical role of early pre-spring topdressing for both early- and late-sprouting cultivars in order to improve N acquisition in spring shoots.

4.2. Role of Soil N Transformation in N Uptake of Tea Trees in Response to Topdressing Timing

In the present work, soil inorganic N contents and pH in the topsoil were analyzed to test the hypothesis that the effect of timing is associated with soil N transformation, which changes in accordance with rising temperature in spring. The content of NH4+-N increased sharply following urea topdressing, which was accompanied by increases in soil pH within 6 days as a result of urea hydrolysis (Figure 3) [28]. The NO3-N content increased, while its share of TIN decreased concomitantly with increasing NH4+-N, indicating the occurrence of nitrification [29]. Consequently, soil pH decreased 30 or 6 days in EApp and LApp, respectively, due largely to nitrification [28]. We did not measure the rate of nitrification in the present work, but the increases in NO3-N content and its share in TIN as well as the decrease in soil pH, which were more rapid and intensive in LApp than in EApp, likely indicate stronger nitrification following the former treatment. The lower nitrification in EApp might be explained by weaker microbial activity [30,31] as a result of lower soil temperature [32,33]. On the other hand, the decrease in NH4+-N and increase in NO3-N share in TIN might be also explained to a certain extent by the preferential absorption of NH4+-N over NO3-N [34,35], which was intensified under elevated temperatures in LApp. Our study identified strong correlations between Ndff in mature leaves, soil pH, and N availability, likely suggesting a direct linkage between soil N transformation processes and tea plant N uptake. The PLS-PM modelling showed that the soil pH value was one of the most important factors affecting the response of N uptake by tea plants to N topdressing timing. In the present work, we observed opposite effects of soil pH on the Ndff of mature leaves and Ndff of young shoots (Figure 6). The Ndff of mature leaves in the short term decreased with increasing soil pH, whereas the Ndff of young shoots increased with increasing soil pH in the long term after N topdressing. The PLS-PM modelling predicted synergy between N uptake by tea plants, N transformation, and soil pH in line with another recent work [36]. This synergy is closely related to the thermo-conditions of early and late N topdressing.

4.3. The Quality and Economic Value of Spring Tea in Response to Topdressing Timing

The quality of young spring shoots in tea plants is primarily determined by the concentrations of free amino acids, tea polyphenols, and caffeine, as well as TP/FAA ratio [37,38]. These key quality components critically influence the economic value of tea. This study showed that the type of cultivar significantly influenced FAA, TP, and the TP/FAA ratio in young spring shoots (Table 1), suggesting that genetic differences between tea cultivars play a major role in determining key quality components. In addition, N fertilization practices in tea plantations, including N application rate [39] and N fertilizer form (e.g., ammonium vs. nitrate) [35,40,41], also significantly modulate tea quality. In the present study, the effects of N application timing on the quality of young shoots were analyzed (Table 1), and we found that N application timing significantly affected TP content in shoots of JM1, with early application (EApp) resulting in lower TP compared to late application (LApp), suggesting that the bitterness of green tea can be reduced [42] and the quality of the tea thereby improved. Given that higher spring tea quality typically commands a higher market price and tea yield significantly increased in EApp compared with LApp, EApp could substantially enhance the economic value of spring tea production in cultivar JM1. However, 15N application date had no significant effect on tea quality parameters for the TGY cultivar, indicating that this cultivar’s biochemical composition is less responsive to N fertilization timing. Meanwhile, the yield only increased slightly; thus, considering the economic value of spring tea, the timing of N application has a relatively small impact on TGY. However, under EApp, the Ndff of young shoots significantly increased, indicating that the contribution of fertilizer N to the current season’s shoots was enhanced.

5. Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that the timing of N fertilizer before the spring tea harvest leads to differences in accumulated heat during fertilization and harvesting, affects soil N supply and N concentration in mature leaves, and indirectly impacts fertilizer N uptake by young shoots of the tea plant. Furthermore, topdressing N applied in late January (EApp) enhanced the utilization of fertilizer N in spring shoots across all tea cultivars compared to application in early March (LApp), irrespective of their sprouting times, under the conditions of this experiment. Specifically, the increases in biomass and total N accumulation in young spring shoots were greater in the early-sprouting cultivar than in the late-sprouting cultivar, while N derived from fertilizer and total uptake of fertilizer N in young spring shoots showed an opposite effect. Our findings highlight the significance of early N fertilizer application before spring tea harvesting for sustaining high yields, N accumulation, and N fertilizer efficiency in tea plants. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing the timing of N fertilizer application in order to enhance the uptake and utilization of fertilizer N, ultimately improving the yield of spring tea.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and J.R.; methodology, Y.Z., L.M. and J.R.; investigation, Y.Z.; data curation, Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Z.; writing—review and editing, K.N., X.Y., L.L. and J.R.; visualization, Y.Z. and J.R.; funding acquisition, J.R. and Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Project (2021YFD1601101), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-19), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS–ASTIP–TRICAAS), and the Tunxi National Agricultural Experimental Station for Agricultural Environment (initial trial, NAES–AE–040).

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NdffN derived from fertilizer
NO3-NNitrate
NH4+-NAmmonium
TINTotal inorganic nitrogen
TNTotal nitrogen
GDDGrowing degree days
JM1Jia-ming 1
TGYTie-guan-yin
EAppEarly application
LAppLate application

References

  1. Tang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, N.; Li, Y.; Ma, Q.; Xiao, H.; Zhou, X.; Xu, X.; Jiang, T.; He, P.; et al. Temporal variation in nutrient requirements of tea (Camellia sinensis) in China based on QUEFTS analysis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tang, S.; Fu, H.R.; Pan, W.K.; Zhou, J.J.; Xu, M.; Han, K.F.; Chen, K.J.; Ma, Q.X.; Wu, L.H. Improving tea (Camellia sinensis) quality, economic income, and environmental benefits by optimizing agronomic nitrogen efficiency: A synergistic strategy. Eur. J. Agron. 2023, 142, 126673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Okano, K.; Matsuo, K. Seasonal changes in uptake, distribution and redistribution of 15N-nitrogen in young tea (Camellia sinensis L.) plants. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 1996, 65, 707–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zaman, F.; Zhang, E.; Khattak, W.A.; Li, J.; Ilyas, M.; Deng, X.; Ihtisham, M.; Guo, F.; Wang, P.; Wang, M.; et al. Natural variations and dynamics of macronutrients for 87 tea plant (Camellia sinensis) varieties throughout the growing seasons in Wuhan. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 306, 111425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, M.; Ma, L.; Shi, Y.; Ruan, J. Metabolomic analyses reveal distinct change of metabolites and quality of green tea during the short duration of a single spring season. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 3302–3309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, F.; Dong, C.; Yang, T.; Ma, J.; Zhang, S.; Wei, C.; Wan, X.; Zhang, Z. Seasonal theanine accumulation and related gene expression in the roots and leaf buds of tea plants (Camellia sinensis L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ni, K.; Liao, W.; Yi, X.; Niu, S.; Ma, L.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, M.; Ruan, J. Fertilization status and reduction potential in tea gardens of China. J. Plant Nutr. Fer. 2019, 25, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ma, L.; Chen, H.; Shan, Y.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, G.; Wu, L.; Ruan, J.; Lv, J.; Shi, Y.; Pan, L.; et al. Status and suggestions of tea garden fertilization on main green tea-producing counties in Zhejiang province. J. Tea Sci. 2013, 33, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pregitzer, K.S.; King, J.S. Effects of soil temperature on nutrient uptake. In Nutrient Acquisition by Plants: An Ecological Perspective; BassiriRad, H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; pp. 277–310. ISBN 978-3-540-27675-3. [Google Scholar]
  10. Quartieri, M.; Millard, P.; Tagliavini, M. Storage and remobilisation of nitrogen by pear (Pyrus Communis L.) trees as affected by timing of N supply. Eur. J. Agron. 2002, 17, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roccuzzo, G.; Scandellari, F.; Allegra, M.; Torrisi, B.; Stagno, F.; Mimmo, T.; Zanotelli, D.; Gioacchini, P.; Millard, P.; Tagliavini, M. Seasonal dynamics of root uptake and spring remobilisation of nitrogen in field grown orange trees. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 226, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ma, L.; Jiang, S.; Deng, M.; Lv, L.; Xu, Z.; Ruan, J. Thermo condition determines the uptake of autumn and winter applied nitrogen and subsequent utilization in spring tea (Camellia sinensis L.). Horticulturae 2021, 7, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, X.; Hao, X.; Ma, C.; Cao, H.; Yue, C.; Wang, L.; Zeng, J.; Yang, Y. Identification of differential gene expression profiles between winter dormant and sprouting axillary buds in tea plant (Camellia sinensis) by suppression subtractive hybridization. Tree Genet. Genomes 2014, 10, 1149–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xiang, F.; Liu, H.; Fu, H.; Zhou, L.; Zhou, P.; Li, W. Effect of combined nitrogen application time on the growth and quality of tea. J. Tea Commun. 2014, 41, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Ye, X.; Zhang, X.; Huang, W.; Zhao, H. Natural variations and dynamic changes of nitrogen indices throughout growing seasons for twenty tea plant (Camellia sinensis) varieties. Plants 2020, 9, 1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Congreves, K.A.; Otchere, O.; Ferland, D.; Farzadfar, S.; Williams, S.; Arcand, M.M. Nitrogen use efficiency definitions of today and tomorrow. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 637108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tan, B.Z.; Close, D.C.; Quin, P.R.; Swarts, N.D. Nitrogen use efficiency, allocation, and remobilization in apple trees: Uptake is optimized with pre-harvest N supply. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 657070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, D.G.; Isaac, M.E. Nitrogen dynamics in agroforestry systems: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2022, 42, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, D.; Ma, J.; Xue, K.; An, Z.; Luo, W.; Sheng, Y. Effects of temperature and humidity on soil gross nitrogen transformation in a typical shrub ecosystem in Yanshan mountain and hilly region. Life 2023, 13, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Zhang, J.; Müller, C.; Cai, Z. Temperature sensitivity of gross N transformation rates in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. J. Soils Sediments 2017, 17, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dan, X.; Chen, Z.; Dai, S.; He, X.; Cai, Z.; Zhang, J.; Müller, C. Effects of changing temperature on gross N transformation rates in acidic subtropical forest soils. Forests 2019, 10, 894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, M.; Chen, S.; Meng, L.; Dan, X.; Wang, W.; Zhu, Q.; Cai, Z.; Zhang, J.; Nardi, P.; Müller, C. Maize genotypes regulate the feedbacks between maize nitrogen uptake and soil nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2024, 188, 109251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. He, C.; Harindintwali, J.D.; Cui, H.; Yao, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, Q.; Wang, F.; Yang, J. Warm growing season activates microbial nutrient cycling to promote fertilizer nitrogen uptake by maize. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 290, 127936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zheng, S.; Ni, K.; Ji, L.; Zhao, C.; Chai, H.; Yi, X.; He, W.; Ruan, J. Estimation of evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of rain-fed tea plants under a subtropical climate. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ma, L.; Zhu, Y.; Geng, S.; Ruan, J. Response of nutritional status and tea quality to the rate and substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic manure. Horticulturae 2022, 8, 1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, L.; Shi, Y.; Ruan, J. Nitrogen absorption by field-grown tea plants (Camellia sinensis) in winter dormancy and utilization in spring shoots. Plant Soil 2019, 442, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nowogrodzki, A. How climate change might affect tea. Nature 2019, 566, S10–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tong, D.; Xu, R. Effects of urea and (NH4)2SO4 on nitrification and acidification of ultisols from southern China. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24, 682–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, X.; Ni, K.; Shi, Y.; Yi, X.; Ji, L.; Ma, L.; Ruan, J. Heavy nitrogen application increases soil nitrification through ammonia-oxidizing bacteria rather than archaea in acidic tea (Camellia sinensis L.) plantation soil. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 717, 137248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kuypers, M.M.M.; Marchant, H.K.; Kartal, B. The Microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yao, H.; Gao, Y.; Nicol, G.W.; Campbell, C.D.; Prosser, J.I.; Zhang, L.; Han, W.; Singh, B.K. Links between ammonia oxidizer community structure, abundance, and nitrification potential in acidic soils. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2011, 77, 4618–4625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dai, Z.; Yu, M.; Chen, H.; Zhao, H.; Huang, Y.; Su, W.; Xia, F.; Chang, S.X.; Brookes, P.C.; Dahlgren, R.A.; et al. Elevated temperature shifts soil N cycling from microbial immobilization to enhanced mineralization, nitrification and denitrification across global terrestrial ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 2020, 26, 5267–5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Shu, W.; Wang, H.; Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Min, H.; Li, Z.; Dell, B.; Chen, L. Differential responses of soil nitrogen forms to climate warming in Castanopsis hystrix and Quercus aliena forests of China. Forests 2024, 15, 1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ruan, L.; Wei, K.; Wang, L.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, F.; Wu, L.; Bai, P.; Zhang, C. Characteristics of NH4+ and NO3 fluxes in tea (Camellia sinensis) roots measured by scanning ion-selective electrode technique. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Tang, D.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, L.; Shi, Y.; Ruan, J. Preferential assimilation of NH4+ over NO3 in tea plant associated with genes involved in nitrogen transportation, utilization and catechins biosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2020, 291, 110369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lin, S.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, G.; Zhang, W.; Wang, H.; He, H. Soil acidification associated with changes in inorganic forms of N reduces the yield of tea (Camellia sinensis). Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2023, 69, 1660–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, C.; Ma, J.; Apostolides, Z.; Chen, L. Metabolomics for a millenniums-old crop: Tea plant (Camellia sinensis). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 6445–6457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cai, H.; Zhong, Z.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Fu, H.; Yang, B.; Zhang, L. Metabolomics in quality formation and characterisation of tea products: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 57, 4001–4014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yin, R.; Li, L.; Li, X.; Liu, H.; Yao, J.; Ma, C.; Pu, L.; Peng, Y.; Lei, Z. Positive effects of nitrogen fertilization on the flavor ingredients of tea (Wuniuzao), soil physicochemical properties, and microbial communities. Environ. Technol. Innovation. 2025, 37, 103911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Y.; Qiu, Q.; Fan, D.; Wang, X.; Zheng, X. Influence of different nitrogen sources on carbon and nitrogen metabolism and gene expression in tea plants (Camellia sinensis L.). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, N.; Hu, Z.; Luo, W.; Chen, C.; Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Zhuang, J. Nitrogen forms and nitrogen deficiency regulate theanine accumulation patterns in tea plants (Camellia sinensis) during winter dormancy. Horticulturae 2025, 11, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, L.; Cao, Q.; Granato, D.; Xu, Y.; Ho, C. Association between chemistry and taste of tea: A review. Trends Food Sci. Tech. 2020, 101, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The location of the experiment site and the microplot experimental design of two tea cultivars, ‘Jia-ming 1’ (JM1) and ‘Tie-guan-yin’ (TGY).
Figure 1. The location of the experiment site and the microplot experimental design of two tea cultivars, ‘Jia-ming 1’ (JM1) and ‘Tie-guan-yin’ (TGY).
Agronomy 15 01090 g001
Figure 2. The daily temperatures (air, soil surface and soil at 0.2 m depth (A)), and rainfall (B) during January and April 2021, and the growing degree days (GDD, T0 = 8 °C, (C)) and cumulative rainfall (D) between the day of fertilization and the first or last harvest. EApp and LApp indicate early (on 29 January) and late (on 10 March) application of 15N-enriched urea, respectively.
Figure 2. The daily temperatures (air, soil surface and soil at 0.2 m depth (A)), and rainfall (B) during January and April 2021, and the growing degree days (GDD, T0 = 8 °C, (C)) and cumulative rainfall (D) between the day of fertilization and the first or last harvest. EApp and LApp indicate early (on 29 January) and late (on 10 March) application of 15N-enriched urea, respectively.
Agronomy 15 01090 g002
Figure 3. The contents of NH4+-N (A) and NO3-N (B) and the share of NO3-N in the total inorganic N (TIN) (C) and pH (D) in the topsoil (0–10 cm) after the application of 15N-enriched urea on 29 January (EApp) and 10 March (LApp) (mean and SE, n = 4). Bars without data points indicate significant differences among sampling dates for the same cultivars and application timings. * denotes significant differences between the two cultivars at the specified dates and N application timings.
Figure 3. The contents of NH4+-N (A) and NO3-N (B) and the share of NO3-N in the total inorganic N (TIN) (C) and pH (D) in the topsoil (0–10 cm) after the application of 15N-enriched urea on 29 January (EApp) and 10 March (LApp) (mean and SE, n = 4). Bars without data points indicate significant differences among sampling dates for the same cultivars and application timings. * denotes significant differences between the two cultivars at the specified dates and N application timings.
Agronomy 15 01090 g003
Figure 4. N concentration (A) and Ndff (B) in mature leaves and their relationship with growing degree days (GDDs) between the day of 15N application and sampling dates (C) in the Jia-ming 1 (JM1) and Tie-guan-yin (TGY) cultivars (mean and SE, n = 4). EApp and LApp denote topdressing with 15N-enriched urea on 29 January and 10 March, respectively. Bars without data points are LSD values indicative of significant difference among sampling dates for the same cultivars and 15N application timings. * denotes significant differences between the two cultivars of the same 15N application timing at the specified sampling dates.
Figure 4. N concentration (A) and Ndff (B) in mature leaves and their relationship with growing degree days (GDDs) between the day of 15N application and sampling dates (C) in the Jia-ming 1 (JM1) and Tie-guan-yin (TGY) cultivars (mean and SE, n = 4). EApp and LApp denote topdressing with 15N-enriched urea on 29 January and 10 March, respectively. Bars without data points are LSD values indicative of significant difference among sampling dates for the same cultivars and 15N application timings. * denotes significant differences between the two cultivars of the same 15N application timing at the specified sampling dates.
Agronomy 15 01090 g004
Figure 5. Ndff (A) (mean and SE, n = 4) and its relation with growing degree days (GDD) between the 15N application and harvesting dates (B), and 15N content (C) in harvested young spring shoots (mean and SE, n = 4). EApp and LApp denote topdressing with 15N-enriched urea on 29 January and 10 March, respectively. Bars without data points are LSD values indicative of significant difference among sampling dates for the same cultivars and 15N application timings. * denotes significant differences between the two application times on the specified harvest dates of the same cultivar.
Figure 5. Ndff (A) (mean and SE, n = 4) and its relation with growing degree days (GDD) between the 15N application and harvesting dates (B), and 15N content (C) in harvested young spring shoots (mean and SE, n = 4). EApp and LApp denote topdressing with 15N-enriched urea on 29 January and 10 March, respectively. Bars without data points are LSD values indicative of significant difference among sampling dates for the same cultivars and 15N application timings. * denotes significant differences between the two application times on the specified harvest dates of the same cultivar.
Agronomy 15 01090 g005
Figure 6. PLS-PM showing the relationships among thermal condition, soil N condition, soil pH, and Ndff in mature leaves (A,B) and young spring shoots (C,D). (A,C) through the path model outputs. Single-headed arrows indicate the hypothesized direction of causation. The width of arrows and numbers near the arrows indicate the strength of standardized path coefficients (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001); the blue and red lines indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. R2 indicates the variance of the dependent variable explained by the model. The goodness-of-fit index indicates the overall fit to the observations. (B,D) show the standardized path coefficients of the direct, indirect, and total effects.
Figure 6. PLS-PM showing the relationships among thermal condition, soil N condition, soil pH, and Ndff in mature leaves (A,B) and young spring shoots (C,D). (A,C) through the path model outputs. Single-headed arrows indicate the hypothesized direction of causation. The width of arrows and numbers near the arrows indicate the strength of standardized path coefficients (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001); the blue and red lines indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. R2 indicates the variance of the dependent variable explained by the model. The goodness-of-fit index indicates the overall fit to the observations. (B,D) show the standardized path coefficients of the direct, indirect, and total effects.
Agronomy 15 01090 g006
Table 1. Quality, density, yield, N content, Ndff, and 15N content of young spring shoots of two cultivars receiving early (EApp) and late (LApp) applications of 15N-enriched urea (mean ± se, n = 4). Data followed by different letters within the same column are significantly (p < 0.05) different. The p-values show the effects of topdressing timing, cultivar, and their interaction.
Table 1. Quality, density, yield, N content, Ndff, and 15N content of young spring shoots of two cultivars receiving early (EApp) and late (LApp) applications of 15N-enriched urea (mean ± se, n = 4). Data followed by different letters within the same column are significantly (p < 0.05) different. The p-values show the effects of topdressing timing, cultivar, and their interaction.
CultivarTreatmentFAA
(%)
TP
(%)
TP/FAADensity
(Shoots Plot−1)
Yield
(g Plot−1)
N Content
(mg Plot−1)
Ndff (%)15N Content
(mg Plot−1)
JM1EApp4.92 ± 0.09 a17.35 ± 0.36 c3.53 ± 0.13 b1461 ± 75 a25.17 ± 1.47 a1429 ± 114 a4.11 ± 0.46 bc57.55 ± 4.15 ab
LApp5.10 ± 0.09 a19.03 ± 0.57 b3.73 ± 0.10 b992 ± 189 ab16.73 ± 3.03 b948 ± 186 b3.37 ± 0.23 c31.38 ± 5.65 b
TGYEApp3.49 ± 0.19 b25.93 ± 0.60 a7.50 ± 0.47 a933 ± 89 b20.57 ± 2.26 ab1077 ± 110 ab8.50 ± 0.26 a91.97 ± 10.99 a
LApp3.45 ± 0.09 b25.88 ± 0.13 a7.52 ± 0.21 a674 ± 26 b16.08 ± 1.77 b856 ± 94 b5.50 ± 0.73 b45.24 ± 3.49 ab
p-ValueCultivar<0.001<0.001<0.0010.0030.2580.115<0.0010.004
Time0.5800.0970.7000.0070.0130.0200.002<0.001
Cultivar × Time0.3880.0810.7380.3660.3890.3400.0320.153
Table 2. Dry matter, N content, and 15N content in pruned material of two cultivars receiving early (EApp) and late (LApp) applications of 15N-enriched urea. Data are mean ± standard error (SE, n = 4). Data followed by different letters within a row are significantly (p < 0.05) different. The p-values show the effects of topdressing time, cultivar and their interaction.
Table 2. Dry matter, N content, and 15N content in pruned material of two cultivars receiving early (EApp) and late (LApp) applications of 15N-enriched urea. Data are mean ± standard error (SE, n = 4). Data followed by different letters within a row are significantly (p < 0.05) different. The p-values show the effects of topdressing time, cultivar and their interaction.
CultivarTreatmentMass (g Plot−1)N Content (g Plot−1)Ndff (%)15N Content (mg Plot−1)
JM1EApp93.9 ± 20.5 b2.23 ± 0.47 ab2.78 ± 0.07 a61.6 ± 12.3 ab
LApp65.9 ± 12.4 b1.63 ± 0.31 b2.77 ± 0.21 a43.6 ± 6.9 b
TGYEApp167.0 ± 22.6 a3.23 ± 0.54 a2.91 ± 0.21 a96.2 ± 21.3 a
LApp111.0 ± 12.5 b2.21 ± 2.69 ab1.93 ± 0.26 b40.7 ± 3.4 b
p-ValueCultivar0.0060.0790.2420.100
Time0.0350.0720.0150.029
Cultivar × Time0.4460.0620.1720.034
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, Y.; Ni, K.; Yang, X.; Long, L.; Ma, L.; Su, Y.; Ruan, J. Effect of Fertilization Timing on Nitrogen Uptake in Spring Tea of Different Sprouting Phenological Cultivars: A Field Trial with 15N Tracing. Agronomy 2025, 15, 1090. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051090

AMA Style

Zhang Y, Ni K, Yang X, Long L, Ma L, Su Y, Ruan J. Effect of Fertilization Timing on Nitrogen Uptake in Spring Tea of Different Sprouting Phenological Cultivars: A Field Trial with 15N Tracing. Agronomy. 2025; 15(5):1090. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051090

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Yongli, Kang Ni, Xiangde Yang, Lizhi Long, Lifeng Ma, Youjian Su, and Jianyun Ruan. 2025. "Effect of Fertilization Timing on Nitrogen Uptake in Spring Tea of Different Sprouting Phenological Cultivars: A Field Trial with 15N Tracing" Agronomy 15, no. 5: 1090. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051090

APA Style

Zhang, Y., Ni, K., Yang, X., Long, L., Ma, L., Su, Y., & Ruan, J. (2025). Effect of Fertilization Timing on Nitrogen Uptake in Spring Tea of Different Sprouting Phenological Cultivars: A Field Trial with 15N Tracing. Agronomy, 15(5), 1090. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051090

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop