Next Article in Journal
How to Minimize the Impact of Biochar on Soil Salinity in Drylands? Lessons from a Data Synthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Pollination Efficiency in Greenhouse Strawberries Through Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Feeding Management
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Film Mulching Enhances Wheat Productivity in Tilled Systems but Not in No-Till Systems by Differentially Regulating Root-Zone Temperature During the Spring Season in the North China Plain

1
Hebei Key Laboratory of Soil Ecology, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 286 Huaizhong Road, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, China
3
Department of Farm Power and Machinery, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam 70060, Pakistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2025, 15(11), 2607; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112607
Submission received: 9 September 2025 / Revised: 4 November 2025 / Accepted: 8 November 2025 / Published: 13 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Innovative Cropping Systems)

Abstract

Enhancing winter wheat yield in early spring relies on optimal soil temperature (ST) conditions and robust root systems, particularly in cold and dry areas. However, the long-term combined effects of conservation tillage and plastic film mulching (PFM) on the crop root system during early spring (the period of rejuvenation and jointing) remain unstudied. This study is based on a 22-year field experiment involving two long-term conservation tillage methods: mouldboard plowing with crop residue incorporation (MC) and no-tillage with crop residue cover (NC). The main treatments were further divided by applying black (B) and white (W) plastic films to each, resulting in MC with black (MCB) and white (MCW), and NC with black (NCB) and white (NCW) films. ST was recorded at depths of 0–40 cm during the afternoon, evening, and morning, while root characteristics (RCs) were measured at the peak flowering stage at depths of 0–60 cm, and crop yield and attributes were recorded at harvest during the 2023–2024 cropping season. Compared with MC and NC, MCB and MCW increased afternoon ST by 2.5 °C and 0.94 °C, and evening ST by 1.94 °C and 1.87 °C, while NCB and NCW decreased ST. MCB and MCW also increased accumulated ST during overwintering (131–161 °C) under the tilled system. PFM on MC increased the root length and weight densities by 10–17% and 25–32%, respectively; NCB and NCW decreased RCs by 8–15.2% across the soil depth. Additionally, afternoon and evening STs at 5–20 cm positively correlated with RCs and yield attributes (r > 0.84), whereas morning ST and a 40 cm depth were negatively correlated (r < −0.77). Under tilled conditions, both MCB and MCW substantially increased grain yield (10–12%) and biomass (31–38%) compared with MC. In contrast, NCB and NCW showed no yield and biomass advantage and even reductions (16–12% and 14–3%, respectively) compared with NC. FPM improved STs, RCs, and yield under tilled conditions but not in no-till systems, highlighting the need for supplementary practices to optimize ST in no-till systems.

1. Introduction

Long-term conservation tillage (LTCT) is a practice that enhances soil productivity by increasing soil organic matter and mitigating soil loss due to erosion [1]. Nevertheless, LTCT practices have been reported to impede soil-warming in cold regions and temperate zones during the early growing season [2]. The application of plastic film mulching (PFM) has been widely adopted as an agricultural practice to increase crop productivity by modifying soil microclimatic conditions, particularly in regions with challenging environmental conditions. In the North China Plain (NCP), where winter temperatures can be severe, PFM has been increasingly utilized during the overwintering period to protect crops and improve soil thermal properties [3]. The NCP, a major agricultural region, experiences cold and dry winters, hindering crop development and reducing yields. With increasing soil temperature, PFM helps extend the growing season, promote root activity, and increase nutrient uptake during the overwintering period [4].
LTCT practices, especially NT (no-tillage), are known to increase the structure and content of organic matter in the soil and play a crucial role in reducing erosion; however, these practices often face challenges related to soil temperature regulation and weed control [5]. Regarding tilled systems, PFM has been shown to significantly raise soil temperature, and moisture retention within the soil profile is a vital factor for both agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability, as it promotes early crop emergence and root development [4]. In contrast, NT systems minimize soil disturbance, preserve soil organic carbon, and enhance water infiltration, but often result in cooler soils during the primary growth stages (tillering to stem elongation), which can delay crop establishment [6]. PFM can address this issue by warming the soil, creating a more favorable environment for seed germination and improved root growth, thus boosting the overall performance of NT systems. Researchers have shown that PFM can significantly increase soil temperature by 2–5 °C compared to un-mulched fields, depending on the soil type, film color, and thickness [7]. This thermal regulation is especially beneficial for early seedling development and root formation, which are critical for crop resilience in low-temperature conditions.
Soil temperature (ST) is a critical factor influencing crop root system architecture (CRSA), which plays a critical role in determining plant growth, nutrient uptake, and overall production. In the NCP, where winter temperatures often drop below optimal levels for crop development, maintaining adequate soil warmth during the overwintering period is essential for sustaining root activity and ensuring crop survival. The relationship between soil temperature and CRSA is well established, with warmer soils promoting root elongation, branching, and biomass accumulation [8]. For example, studies on winter wheat have confirmed that mulched soils, which are 2–5 °C warmer than un-mulched soils, exhibit significantly greater root length density and deeper root penetration, particularly during the overwintering period. These adaptations are crucial for crop resilience in cold environments, as they improve water and nutrient acquisition and support post-dormancy recovery [9]. Moreover, the thermal regulation provided by PFM not only enhances root growth but also influences the spatial spread of roots within the soil profile. This deeper rooting pattern helps crops access subsoil water reserves, thereby improving drought tolerance and yield stability. However, the long-term impacts of PFM on soil health and root development, such as potential root restriction due to plastic residues, warrant further investigation [10].
Eliminating transparent films after the stem elongation stage can increase corn yields [11]. Compared with colorless films (transparent), plastic films (FPs), which are black, might have less potential to increase soil temperatures owing to their low brightness absorbency and modest allowance via luminous heat [12]. However, some studies have shown that black plastic film can decrease soil mineralization, and the influence of temperature on the consistency of soil nutrients has been documented in various studies [13], as has the manipulation of weeds [14,15] compared with transparent or white plastic films. On the other hand, in contrast to white films, the black color of plastic films results in greater corn production [16,17], but the opposite results have also been detected, with no variations in either black or white films.
Long-term (17 years) research revealed an explicit association between increasing temperature before anthesis and spring wheat yield. Additionally, higher temperatures throughout seedling-to-stem elongation (jointing) greatly promoted the ending of yield, owing to increased spike development [18]. Long-term conservation tillage practices influence soil structure, nutrient distribution, and crop productivity in the North China Plain, with no-till (NC) systems often showing lower winter wheat yields than moldboard-based conservation tillage (MC) [19,20,21]. These yield penalties are linked to cooler early-season seedbeds, stronger surface stratification of SOC and nutrients, and higher near-surface bulk density under NT, which limit early vigor and root penetration [22,23].
In the NCP, scientific evidence is scarce regarding soil temperature under long-term conservation tillage after planting, which hinders efforts to persuade farmers to adopt this agricultural practice without conclusive data. The effects of increasing soil temperature are reported to be limited to crop agronomic traits during the overwintering period; however, increasing soil temperature during the overwintering period and its response to the root system under long-term conservation tillage systems are unexplored and crucial. Therefore, the impacts of plastic films (black and white) under 22 years of LTCT practices on winter wheat root systems and soil thermal conditions during the overwintering period were evaluated. We hypothesized that low early spring (the period of rejuvenation and jointing) temperatures limit wheat yield by restricting root development, and that film mulching mitigates this constraint in no-tilled conditions—but not necessarily in tilled systems by improving soil thermal conditions. However, we acknowledge that the actual mulching response may vary depending on the long-term soil physical properties developed under different tillage systems, which this study aimed to evaluate. We intended to estimate (1) the impacts of plastic film on soil thermal conditions during the early spring period (rejuvenation and jointing in March and April months) under tilled (MC) and no-till NC systems, and (2) to evaluate the effects of tillage and plastic film mulching on root system characteristics and their relationship with yield.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Experimental Area Description

The experimental study was conducted at the Luancheng Agroecosystem Experimental Station (37°53′ N, 114°41′ E), affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), on a long-term conservation tillage experimental field in Hebei Province, China’s North China Plain. The area features a temperate semiarid monsoon climate characterized by cold winters and hot summers. The mean annual air temperature is 12.5 °C, with an average yearly rainfall of 482 mm, approximately 70% of which falls between July and September. As reported by Wu et al. [24], the soil is termed a fluvo-aquic subtype formed by an alluvial fan of limestone, and the soil classification is categorized as silt loam Haplic Cambisol (138 g kg−1 sand, 663 g kg−1 silt, and 199 g kg−1 clay). The availability of nutrients in the topsoil layer (0–20 cm) is as follows: total nitrogen (110 mg kg−1), phosphorus (15 mg kg−1), exchangeable potassium (95 mg kg−1), and soil organic matter (15 g kg−1). The major crops cultivated in the NCP are winter wheat and summer maize; therefore, wheat and maize production contribute 76% and 29% of the country’s total production, respectively. The dominant cropping system in this region is a winter wheat summer maize (or soybean) double-cropping system. Winter wheat is planted in mid-October and harvested in early June through sprinkler irrigation.

2.2. Main Experimental Plot Design

The experiment was designed on two well-established long-term conservation tillage practices that were initiated in October 2001, with complete randomized block design treatments: moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil (MC) and no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface (NC), which were used to investigate the objectives of our study. The plowing depth for the MC treatment was approximately 20 cm. Both main experiments (MC and NC) had three replications and covered 560 m2 (8 m × 70 m, respectively). After the winter wheat harvest, the wheat straw was mechanically chopped (5–10 cm) and evenly distributed on the soil surface as mulch in all the treatments. No further tillage operation was performed during maize planting in MC. In the intermediate period after the winter wheat harvest in June, maize, which is 15–20 cm high, is planted in the wheat straw.

2.3. Split-Plot Experimental Design

The main experimental plots (MC and NC) were split into four subplots to investigate the differences in the soil thermal conditions and their direct effects on the crop root system in MC and NC. To verify the different degrees of soil temperature in the soil profiles over 22 years of different long-term conservation tillage practices, both MC and NC were split and designed into additional subplots by applying plastic film (black and white/transparent) with a total area of 20 m2 (4 m × 5 m) for each in 2024. Subplots were established in a randomized block design and replicated three times. The subplots were classified as MCB and MCW (MC with black plastic and white plastic films, respectively) and NCB and NCW (NC with black plastic and white plastic films, respectively). Specifically, both the black and white films were polyethylene (PE) with a thickness of 8 μm. The films had visible light transmittance of approximately 85% (white film) and 10% (black film), and solar reflectivity of about 70% (white film) and 15% (black film), respectively. A detailed layout of the experimental design for all the treatments is presented in Figure 1. The plastic films were used to cover the soil strips adjacent to the crop rows only during March and April 2024 (overwintering period or after the tillering to jointing stages), and then the plastic films were removed on 30 April 2024.
The cultivar Kenong1413, the most popular for winter wheat in the region, was sown. The sowing of seeds was accomplished on 20 October 2023, and harvesting was performed on 10 June 2024. The fertilizer application during the sowing stage was carried out as per local recommendations. Before the jointing stage, urea fertilizer was applied at a rate of 135 kg N ha−1. Agronomic control practices, including pest control and weed control, were performed equally by following local techniques for wheat. An identical amount of water was sprayed on each plot via a sprinkler irrigation system, and an extra two irrigations were applied accordingly, with an average of 40 to 50 mm per application, depending on precipitation. Before the soil moisture in the root zone reached 65% of the field’s capacity, irrigation was performed.

2.4. Monitoring the Soil Temperature (ST) and Soil Moisture Level

A soil thermometer, made with mercury in the glass, was installed at 0 cm, 5 cm, 10 cm, 20 cm, and 40 cm depths between the winter wheat rows in each treatment. The ST was recorded at three different times: morning (7:30–8:00 h), afternoon (13:30–14:00 h), and evening (17:30–18:00 h). The ST was recorded on alternate days from 7 March to 30 April 2024. The ST was replicated three times for each reading for the daily average ST. The soil moisture level in the soil was determined at five depths (0–60 cm) at 10 and 20 cm intervals via the gravimetric method at four main crop growth stages (tillering, jointing, flowering, and maturity stages) via an 8 cm diameter soil core.

2.5. Measurements of Crop Roots and Aboveground Dry Matter (AGDM)

Crop roots were sampled from individual LTCT treatments (replicated three times, with one sample taken along the crop row and the other in the middle of the rows) when the root system reached its peak at the maturity stage (19 May 2024), as described by Zhang et al. [4]. We carefully removed the aboveground parts of the wheat plants before collecting root samples; the roots were sampled at soil depths of 0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm, up to a depth of 60 cm. Washed roots were retrieved from water using a 2000 µm mesh sieve. Afterward, the roots were manually cleaned to prevent contamination and remove foreign particles, then dipped in a 10% (v/v) ethanol solution. Once gently extracted from the soil, the roots were stored at temperatures below 4 °C for further analysis. Root scanning was performed using an Epson Expression 1000 XL scanner (Seiko Epson Corporation, Nagano, Japan) at 600 dpi, equipped with a dual lighting ribbon source to reduce sample overlap following the method described by Chimento et al. [25]. The scanned images were analyzed using WinRHIZO 2013 software (Regent Instruments Inc., Québec City, QC, Canada, Figure S1, Supplementary Materials). Key root characteristics (RCs), such as root length (RL), root diameter (RD), root surface area (RSA), and root volume (RV), were measured. The data from the software were organized and further analyzed using a detailed Excel spreadsheet.
The root length density (RLD) and root weight density (RWD) were calculated based on the known volumes of soil and roots, respectively, following the methods of [26]. The root dry biomass (RDBM) was determined by oven drying the root samples at 65 °C until a constant weight was achieved. At crop maturity, aboveground dry matter (AGDM) was assessed by randomly selecting ten uniform plants from each treatment. These samples were oven-dried at 60 °C until all moisture was removed, and then the dry weights were recorded.

2.6. Estimation of Crop Yield Attributes

Harvesting of the winter wheat crop was conducted at the maturity stage manually from each plot to measure the crop grain yield and yield attributes (straw yield and 1000-grain weight) at a moisture content of 13%. The number of spikes was sampled by randomly calculating the area of 1.5 m2 in each plot, which was equivalent to 20 plants being picked to record the grain number and spike number.

2.7. Analysis of Data

Data were analyzed using a two-way split-plot ANOVA with tillage (MC and NC) as the main plot factor and mulching (no mulch, black film, and white film) as the subplot factor. When the interaction between tillage and mulching was significant, simple-effect comparisons were performed using Tukey’s HSD (α = 0.05). Multivariate principal component analysis (PCA) and Pearson correlation analysis tests were conducted for STs and RCs and agronomic traits, respectively, via a correlation plot in OriginPro 2025 (Learning Edition). The data on root characteristics were normalized (0–100, mean) at four different soil depths (0–60 cm) to generate radar graphs.

3. Results

3.1. Climate Data

The average monthly precipitation and air temperature (minimum, maximum, and mean) from October 2023 to June 2024 are shown in Figure 2. The highest precipitation occurred in May 2024 (150 mm), while the lowest was in October 2023 (2.7 mm). The highest average air temperature was recorded in June 2024 (27.8 °C), and the lowest in December 2023 (−3.4 °C). These data indicate typical seasonal patterns for the North China Plain, with a cold, dry winter and a warm, humid summer.

3.2. ST

3.2.1. Dynamics of ST in the 0–40 cm Soil Layer

Compared with the non-plastic film treatments, soil temperature within the 0–40 cm profile was consistently higher under plastic film mulching (PFM) in both long-term conservation tillage systems. In the afternoon, the highest average soil temperature occurred in MCB (22.4 °C), followed by MCW (21.1 °C), while NCB and NCW reached 20.6 °C and 20.5 °C, respectively (Figure 3a). The lowest afternoon temperature was recorded in NC (19.6 °C). In the evening, a similar pattern was observed, with MCB and MCW maintaining the highest temperatures compared with all other treatments. Although morning soil temperatures were generally lower and more uniform among treatments, MCB and MCW still exhibited slightly higher values than NC and NCW.
Figure 3b1–b3 indicates that at 5, 10, and 20 cm depths, MCB and MCW consistently maintained higher afternoon and evening STs than MC, NC, NCB, and NCW. This consistent pattern highlights the positive thermal influence of combining mulching with tillage. At 10 cm, daily fluctuations lessened, emphasizing the enhanced thermal retention of MCB and MCW (1–2 °C above NC and NCB). Even at 20 cm, both treatments sustained slightly higher and more stable STs. Moreover, correlations between root characteristics (RCs) and STs showed significant (p < 0.05) positive relationships between afternoon and evening average STs (AAST and EAST) and RLD (r = 0.83, 0.94), RWD (r = 0.69, 0.84), and AGBM (r = 0.69, 0.58), while RD was negatively correlated (r = −0.38, −0.34). In contrast, morning average STs (MASTs) were negatively related to RCs and AGBM, indicating that lower morning STs were less favorable for winter wheat root growth and biomass accumulation compared with AAST and EAST during the overwintering period.

3.2.2. Averaged STs at 0–40 cm

Figure 4 illustrates the average soil temperature at 0–40 cm during the morning, afternoon, and evening. Both tillage and PFM significantly affected afternoon and evening soil temperatures (p < 0.05), with a notable tillage × mulching interaction. In contrast, morning temperatures showed no significant differences among treatments. MCB and MCW had the highest soil-warming effect, particularly in the afternoon, increasing soil temperature by 2.5 °C and 1.9 °C compared with the un-mulched controls. The warming effect was stronger under MC than under C, indicating that tillage enhanced the soil’s thermal response to film mulching. In the morning, soil temperature remained uniformly low (8.5–9.0 °C) across all treatments due to overnight cooling. By the afternoon, clear differences emerged, with MCB (17.8 °C) and MCW (17.2 °C) being significantly warmer than the other treatments. Although cooling occurred in the evening, MCB and MCW still retained higher residual heat (15.5 °C), confirming that tillage combined with film mulching improved soil heat storage and retention.

3.2.3. Averaged STs at Different Soil Depths

Figure 5 shows that both tillage and mulching significantly affected soil temperature across all depths (p < 0.05), and the interaction between them was also significant, especially in the afternoon and evening. At 0 cm depth, MCB recorded the highest average temperature (30.0 °C), followed by NCB (29.8 °C), MCW (28.6 °C), and NCW (29.4 °C). At 5–20 cm, MCB and MCW consistently maintained higher afternoon and evening soil temperatures, while NCW and NCB exhibited only minor warming. Temperature differences decreased with depth but remained evident up to 20 cm. MCB and MCW showed more stable thermal conditions, emphasizing their stronger capacity for heat retention in the upper soil layer. Positive correlations were observed between soil temperature at 5–20 cm and root traits (RLD, r = 0.44–0.85; RWD, r = 0.45–0.76; p < 0.05), confirming that warmer topsoil promoted better root development.

3.2.4. Soil-Accumulated Temperature (SAT)

Because of tillage and PFM, the SAT across all soil depths (p < 0.05) were significantly affected, and their interaction was also significant (p < 0.01, Table 1). During the afternoon, soil heat accumulation increased markedly under PFM in both tillage systems, especially within the upper 0–20 cm soil layer in the afternoon and evening compared with the un-mulched control (p < 0.05). The highest SAT values were recorded in MCB (677 °C), NCB (670 °C), and NCW (662 °C) at 0 cm, followed by MCW (640 °C), while the lowest occurred in MC (588 °C) and NC (595 °C). Comparisons between tillage systems under the same mulching treatment further showed that MC > NC for all depths up to 20 cm (p < 0.05). These results demonstrate that the interaction effect was mainly driven by the enhanced soil-warming capacity of film mulching under tilled conditions.
In the evening, both tillage and PFM remained highly significant (p < 0.001), with strong interaction effects across all depths. Surface layers (0–10 cm) under MCB and MCW maintained the highest ASTs, while NCW and NCB showed moderate warming relative to NC. These results suggest that the combination of tillage and PFM improved heat retention capacity, moderating nocturnal soil cooling. In the morning, ST differences among treatments were smaller, yet both tillage and PFM still significantly affected AST (p < 0.001), with a strong interaction effect at all depths. No-tillage treatments (NC, NCW, NCB) tended to retain more residual heat near the surface than MC treatments, likely due to reduced soil heat loss overnight under residue cover. Moreover, the SAT in the afternoon and evening showed strong positive correlations with root traits and yield components: RLD (r = 0.82–0.93, p < 0.05), RWD (r = 0.67–0.86, p < 0.05), RSA (r = 0.11–0.48, p < 0.05), and AGDM (r = 0.30–0.60, p < 0.05). Conversely, morning AST was negatively correlated with RLD (r = −0.92, p < 0.05), RWD (r = −0.86, p < 0.05), and AGDM (r = −0.77, p < 0.05), indicating that excessive nocturnal cooling may have limited early root and shoot activity.

3.3. Effects of STs on Root Characteristics (RCs)

Since a significant tillage × mulching interaction was observed for root traits at 0–20 cm (p < 0.05; Table 2), under MC, both MCB and MCW markedly increased root length density (RLD) and root weight density (RWD) relative to un-mulched MC (p < 0.05). Under NC, differences among NC, NCB, and NCW were not significant, and values remained lower than those under MC treatments. When compared within each mulching type, the tilled plots consistently showed greater RLD, RWD, and root surface area than no-till plots (p < 0.05). Therefore, the interaction mainly reflects the stronger stimulatory effect of plastic film on root proliferation under tilled conditions.

3.3.1. Improvement in Root Length Density (RLD) and Root Weight Density (RWD)

The optimized ST attributes at 0–40 cm under plastic film mulching (black and white) with MC significantly influenced root length density RLD and RWD at shallow depths (0–20 cm) (p < 0.001), while no significant effects occurred at 40–60 cm. Normalized data (0–100) showed the highest total RLD and RWD (0–60 cm) in MCW (9.51 cm cm−3 and 1.35 g cm−3, Table 2) and MCB (8.95 cm cm−3 and 1.30 g cm−3), followed by MC (7.88 cm cm−3 and 1.26 g cm−3) and NC (5.58 cm cm−3 and 1.03 g cm−3). The most significant increases (p < 0.05) occurred in RLD at 0–10 and 10–20 cm in MCW and MCB due to enhanced ST and tillage effects, while NCW consistently had the lowest values, likely due to cooler, compacted soil and reduced heat reflection. In the 20–40 cm layer, MCW surpassed MCB in RLD, indicating deeper root penetration, whereas MC showed the highest values at 40–60 cm, suggesting effective deep rooting under tillage. Figure 6 shows strong positive correlations (r = 0.85–0.90, p < 0.005) were observed between RLD, RWD, and yield attributes (GY, 100 GW, SN, SY, GN, and HI).

3.3.2. Influence on Root Surface Area (RSA)

Considering all the observations across the soil layers (0–60 cm) for the distribution of RSA, tillage and PFM significantly increased RSA (180 cm2) in NCW at a topsoil depth of 10–20 cm, whereas in the intermediate soil layer (20–40), RSA was highest in MCW (103.72 cm2) compared with NC (52 cm2) (Figure 7 and Table 2). The deeper soil layer (40–60) was not significantly different among the tillage and PFM treatments, whereas MC presented the highest RSA (88.70 cm2), followed by NC (67.65 cm2), and MCW presented the lowest RSA (42.39 cm2 and 13.67 cm2, respectively). In addition, positive correlations were detected between RSA and GY (r = 0.5, p < 0.05), 100 GW (r = 0.54, p < 0.005), SN (r = 0.45, p < 0.05), GN (r = 0.53, p < 0.005), SY (r = 0.49, p < 0.05), and HI (r = 0.52, p < 0.05).

3.3.3. Root Volume (RV) and Root Diameter (RD) Response to STs

The increase in soil temperature from shallow to deeper layers showed no significant effect of plastic film mulching (PFM) on root volume (RV), at 20–40 cm, where MCW had the highest RV (0.66 cm3) compared with NC (0.34 cm3). The greatest RV occurred at 0–10 cm in MC (2.71 cm3), followed by NCB (2.70 cm3) and MCB (2.58 cm3), with the lowest in MCW (1.92 cm3). Root depth (RD) differed significantly only at 10–20 cm, being higher in NCB (2.62 mm) and NCW (2.60 mm) than in MC (2.09 mm), MCB (2.06 mm), and MCW (2.05 mm). RV correlated positively (r = 0.26–0.38) and RD negatively (r = −0.32 to −0.48) with agronomic traits (p < 0.05).

3.4. Effects of Soil Moisture Content (SMC) at Different Growth Stages

Soil moisture content varied significantly among treatments and depths throughout the growth stages (Figure 8). Both tillage and the tillage × mulching interaction significantly affected SMC (p < 0.05), while the main effect of mulching alone was not significant. During the tillering stage, NCB and NCW showed the highest SMC (18%), whereas NC had the lowest. At the jointing stage, differences among treatments narrowed as SMC stabilized (13–18%). During flowering, heavy rainfall in May 2024 increased SMC across all treatments, with NCB and NCW maintaining the highest moisture levels. By maturity, SMC declined, remaining lowest in NC and highest in NCB and NCW. Furthermore, Pearson correlation analysis showed that an average SMC (ASMC) correlated positively with AGDM, AAST, and EAST (r = 0.58–0.9, p < 0.05).

3.5. Response of Crop Yield Attributes and Aboveground Dry Matter (AGDM)

Grain yield and its components responded significantly to tillage and the tillage × mulching interaction (p < 0.05), while the main effect of mulching was not significant (Table 3). Under tilled conditions, both MCB and MCW substantially increased grain yield (10–12%) compared with MC. In contrast, NCB and NCW showed no yield advantage and even slight reductions (16–12%) compared with NC. Under MC, film mulching (MCB and MCW) significantly improved grain yield, 1000-grain weight, spike number, and straw yield compared with un-mulched MC (p < 0.05). Under NC, no significant differences were found among mulching treatments. Within each mulching type, tilled plots consistently produced higher yields and biomass than no-till plots. This indicates that yield improvement through film mulching occurred only when combined with tillage, explaining the significant interaction between factors.
AGDM was highest under MCW (4.23 g plant−1) and MCB (4.07 g plant−1), exceeding MC (3.17 g plant−1) and NC (2.79 g plant−1). Grain yield and yield attributes were strongly positively correlated with afternoon and evening soil temperatures (r = 0.84–0.97, p < 0.05) and negatively with morning soil temperatures (r = −0.73 to −0.85, p < 0.05).

3.6. Multivariate Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to Tillge Systems and PFM

The PCA summarized the multivariate relationships among root characteristics, soil temperature parameters, and yield components (Figure 9). The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained 63.7% and 18.1% of the total variance, respectively. PC1 was positively associated with root and yield traits (RLD, RWD, RSA, RV, GY, SN, GN, 1000 GW, and HI), with MCB and MCW strongly associated with this component. These treatments corresponded to higher soil temperatures and better crop performance. In contrast, NCW and NCB were negatively associated with PC1 and PC2, reflecting lower soil temperature and weaker root and yield performance. PC2 distinguished MC by its slightly greater temperature fluctuation at depth. Overall, PCA confirmed that film mulching combined with tillage (MCB and MCW) improved the soil thermal regime, root system development, and yield, while no-till treatments with film mulching (NCB and NCW) showed limited benefit.

4. Discussion

4.1. Impact of Tillage and PFM on Soil Temperature During the Overwintering Period

The significant interaction between tillage and mulching indicates that the response of ST to plastic film depended on the tillage systems. Under the tilled system (MC), film mulching improved soil aeration and heat transfer, resulting in higher soil temperatures. In contrast, under no-tillage, the compacted surface and residue cover likely reduced heat conduction, minimizing the mulching effect. These findings emphasize that soil disturbance through tillage enhances the thermal benefits of plastic mulching. MCB and MCW significantly increased AAST, AEST, ASAT, and ESAT during the low spring months of March and April. This increase is primarily attributed to the greenhouse effect created by transparent or black plastic film, which effectively raises soil temperatures [6,27,28]. During the early growth stages of winter wheat, this effect is particularly beneficial, as the small canopy exposes most of the plastic-covered surface to solar radiation, allowing enhanced soil heating beneath the film. In contrast, NC treatments (NCB and NCW) significantly reduced soil temperatures during the rejuvenation and jointing periods. This reduction is largely due to the higher albedo of straw mulch in NC, which reflects solar radiation and limits heat penetration into the soil [6]. Moreover, the lower thermal conductivity of no-tillage soils slows heat transfer, causing ST to increase more gradually under solar radiation [29]. ST is a critical factor in regulating plant growth and development [30], and multiple studies have demonstrated that different mulching materials distinctly influence soil thermal regimes to maximize crop productivity [6]. Our findings indicated that variations in ST under MC and NC, with the same covering materials but different colors, produced greater ST dynamics (MCB and MCW). This is likely due to differing degrees of long-term soil disturbance between tilled (MC) and no-tillage (NC) systems. Previous studies report that plastic film mulching can effectively increase topsoil temperature (0–20 cm) through the choice of plastic film color [17]. Black PE [31] and white transparent films [32] are commonly used to cover dryland crop soils, and their transmissivity and opacity determine the degree of solar radiation penetration. Transparent films can increase ST by 2.3–2.9 °C [17], while black films may reduce it by 1–2 °C [14], thereby modulating crop growth by altering soil temperature, particularly in the topsoil [4,33].
During our 22-year-long-term conservation tillage study (MC and NC), plastic films (MCB and MCW) optimized ST (AST) by 2–3 °C at 5–10 cm depths, more effectively diffusing heat than at deeper layers (20 cm). These findings align with prior studies indicating that no-tillage soils generally exhibit lower temperatures than tilled soils [34,35]. MCB and MCW maintained superior thermal conditions compared with NC, NCB, and NCW throughout the overwintering period. Their lower albedo and higher thermal conductivity, relative to NC, allow soil temperature to adjust progressively with solar radiation intensity, particularly in the afternoon and evening [36]. Additionally, MC soils had less surface cover than NC, and plastic film does not prevent water–atmosphere exchange, which enhances latent heat flux and further contributes to higher soil temperatures under MCB and MCW. These enhanced thermal conditions under MCB and MCW optimize root growth compared with NC. Previous studies have shown that mulching exerts a dual effect on soil hydrothermal conditions, warming during jointing stages and cooling during post stages [32,37]. Consistently, our study utilized the warming effect of plastic films from tillering to jointing stages, positively influencing the winter wheat root system, with the effect more pronounced under the tilled system. A three-year comparison of no-tillage with plastic re-mulching and reduced tillage with plastic mulching revealed clear differences in thermal regulation, vertical temperature gradients, accumulated soil temperature, and moisture distribution, particularly within the 5–25 cm layer, while neither year nor year × treatment interaction significantly influenced these outcomes [38]. Lower soil temperatures in no-tillage systems primarily result from crop residue insulation, reduced soil disturbance, and higher soil moisture, which collectively moderate soil temperature, making no-tillage soils cooler than tilled soils [39]. No-tillage increases surface (0–5 cm) temperature but fails to conduct heat efficiently to lower layers or maintain daytime warming due to higher soil bulk density and surface compaction, highlighting the importance of combining tillage with plastic mulching to optimize soil thermal conditions for crop growth.
Though our initial hypothesis proposed that film mulching would alleviate temperature constraints more effectively in no-till systems, the results did not support this expectation. Instead, stronger positive effects were observed under tilled conditions. This difference can be attributed to the contrasting soil physical properties (soil bulk density and soil moisture content) resulting from long-term management. In no-till plots, thick surface residues and higher bulk density reduced thermal conductivity and weakened the soil-warming effect of the mulch. In contrast, tilled soils had closer film–soil contact and higher heat transfer efficiency, which stabilized temperature in the 5–20 cm layer and promoted root growth and yield. These findings indicate that the benefits of PFM depend strongly on soil structure and residue conditions, and that complementary practices—such as shallow loosening or improved mulch design—may be needed to enhance thermal response in long-term no-till systems

4.2. Root Characteristics Response to PFM and Tillage System

The interaction between tillage and PFM played a decisive role in modifying soil thermal and physical environments, which in turn influenced root system development. Reduced soil bulk density under MC significantly amplified the effects of plastic mulching on ST and root weight density (RWD). Consequently, in tilled plots with lower bulk density, the application of plastic mulch increased both soil temperature and RWD compared with un-mulched conditions, resulting in greater biomass production and yield accumulation [40]. Optimized ST profiles under PFM within the tilled system also enhanced key root characteristics (RCs)—particularly RLD, RWD, and RSA—during the overwintering and early spring growth stages. These results support the hypothesis that combining tillage with PFM improves soil thermal conditions and accelerates root system establishment from March to April, when root growth is most sensitive to temperature [41].
Significant increases in RLD and RWD were observed in the top 0–20 cm soil layer, with the strongest effects in MCW and MCB treatments. These treatments provided warmer, well-aerated soil that promoted both horizontal and vertical root expansion, leading to improved resource capture. In contrast, no-tillage (NC) plots exhibited compacted soil structure, lower ST, and reduced root proliferation, consistent with findings from other conservation tillage studies [26,41]. Although most root biomass was concentrated in the upper 20 cm, the combined tillage and PFM treatments (MCW, MCB) facilitated greater root penetration into deeper layers, enhancing RSA and overall root efficiency. Root volume (RV) distribution remained relatively stable across treatments, suggesting that tillage and mulching primarily affected root density and surface area rather than total root volume [42].
Overall, the increase in ST and reduction in bulk density under MCW and MCB treatments were positively correlated with RLD, RWD, and RSA, and indirectly with yield attributes, highlighting the critical role of optimized soil thermal and structural conditions in improving root development and crop productivity. These findings confirm that tillage enhances the structural environment for root growth, while PFM improves the thermal regime, and that their combination provides synergistic benefits for winter wheat growth and yield formation [43,44].

4.3. RC Enhanced Yield and Yield Parameters

Plastic film mulching under long-term tilled conditions (MCW and MCB) significantly improved root characteristics by optimizing ST during the overwintering period, enhancing agronomic traits, and increasing aboveground dry matter (AGDM). Compared with no-tillage, PFM, MCW, and MCB promoted topsoil root extension, which has a greater impact on yield than deeper root growth under mulching [43]. Mulch coverage improved grain yield and substantially increased straw yield [45]. In this study, adding PFM to MC enhanced both grain and straw yield, whereas long-term no-tillage treatments (NCW and NCB) experienced reduced yields. Extreme soil moisture under full-film mulching can cause yield decline due to water stress; however, film mulching helps regulate soil moisture at different growth stages to optimize yields [46]. Tillage combined with plastic film is an effective strategy for improving crop productivity, and plow tillage with PFM achieves higher yields while reducing carbon footprint [47]. Early-stage PFM maintained the highest soil moisture content, supporting winter wheat yield and AGDM. Biomass allocation reflects root-to-shoot ratio, and since winter wheat growth is mostly aboveground, PFM on MC enhanced AGDM. These results align with previous studies, which have shown that PFM improves root–shoot coordination, reduces redundant root growth, and lowers the root-to-shoot ratio, thereby promoting yield [48,49,50].

4.4. Relationships Among the ST, RC, and Yield Agronomical Parameters

Strong positive correlations between ST and RLD and RWD indicate that warmer soils, particularly during early and middle growth stages, enhance root proliferation and biomass accumulation [51]. This aligns with established agronomic theory, as elevated ST generally increases root metabolic activity and nutrient absorption, facilitating robust early crop establishment and improved resource-use efficiency [6]. Conversely, the negative correlation between morning average ST (MAST) and aboveground dry matter (AGDM) suggests that excessive thermal stress during critical developmental stages may reduce shoot biomass despite enhanced root growth [52]. Depth-specific ST effects were observed, with shallow layers (AST10) significantly promoting root growth, emphasizing the importance of managing soil temperature via practices such as mulching and conservation tillage to improve resource-use efficiency and crop resilience under changing climate conditions [53].
Positive correlations between grain parameters and AAST, EAST, ASAT, and ESAT highlight the role of sufficient thermal accumulation for optimal grain filling, consistent with previous studies on temperature’s influence in crop physiology [54]. Moderate-depth ST (AST10 and AST20) further supports root growth, enhancing nutrient uptake and water-use efficiency critical for resilience under variable climates [55]. Strong correlations between RLD, RWD, and grain yield underline the role of extensive, dense root systems in nutrient and water acquisition, directly contributing to yield [56,57]. Moderate positive correlations with root surface area (RSA) suggest that greater root–soil contact enhances resource absorption and crop performance under stress [58]. Negative correlations with root diameter (RD) indicate that finer roots are more efficient in resource uptake due to higher surface-area-to-volume ratios [59]. These findings emphasize optimizing RCs through agronomic strategies, including irrigation, conservation tillage, and breeding programs, to enhance root architecture, improve yield stability, crop resilience, and resource-use efficiency [60].

5. Conclusions

This long-term study examined how soil temperature, root development, and wheat yield respond to different tillage systems combined with plastic film mulching in the North China Plain. After 22 years of conservation tillage, distinct differences emerged between tilled (MC) and no-till (NC) systems in their response to film mulching. Plastic film mulching significantly increased soil temperature, root growth, and yield only under tilled conditions. In the mouldboard plow system (MC), black and white films (MCB and MCW) enhanced soil temperature by 2–3 °C in the 5–20 cm layer, promoted greater root length and weight densities, and increased grain yield by 10–12% compared with un-mulched controls. In contrast, under no-tillage (NC), plastic films produced minimal or even negative effects on soil temperature, root traits, and yield performance. These findings indicate that long-term tillage history determines the effectiveness of plastic film mulching. The warmer and more aerated soil structure under MC improved heat transfer and root proliferation, while compacted, residue-covered soils under NC limited thermal conduction and restricted plant response to mulching. Overall, this study demonstrates that the benefits of plastic film mulching depend strongly on soil structure and management history. To optimize soil temperature and crop productivity in no-till systems, complementary practices—such as shallow loosening, partial residue removal, or improved mulch design—should be considered.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy15112607/s1, Figure S1: Representative WinRHIZO root scans for different treatments across soil depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm).

Author Contributions

W.D., C.H. and A.K. contributed to the conceptualization of the study. Methodology was developed by A.K., W.D., C.H. and X.L. A.K., W.D. and X.L. performed software development and data visualization. Formal analysis and investigation were carried out by A.K., W.D. and X.L. Data curation was managed by A.K. and X.L. W.D. and C.H. provided supervision and project administration support. Resources were provided by W.D. and C.H. A.K. wrote the original draft of the manuscript, and W.D. and C.H. contributed to reviewing and editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD1901002-2 and 2023YFD1902605-01). The first author was financially supported by the Chinese Government Scholarship (CGS).

Data Availability Statement

The availability of data will be presented upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Plaza, C.; Courtier-Murias, D.; Fernández, J.M.; Polo, A.; Simpson, A.J. Physical, chemical, and biochemical mechanisms of soil organic matter stabilization under conservation tillage systems: A central role for microbes and microbial by-products in C sequestration. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2012, 57, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Licht, M.A.; Al-Kaisi, M. Strip-tillage effect on seedbed soil temperature and other soil physical properties. Soil. Tillage Res. 2004, 80, 233–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gan, Y.; Siddique, K.H.M.; Turner, N.C.; Li, X.-G.; Niu, J.-Y.; Yang, C.; Liu, L.; Chai, Q. Ridge-Furrow Mulching Systems—An innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid Rain-Fed environments. In Advances in agronomy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 429–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Du, X.; Zhang, W.-H.; Zhang, Y.-S.; Cao, C.-Y.; Li, K.-J. Artificial Warming from Late Winter to Early Spring by Phased Plastic Mulching Increases Grain Yield of Winter Wheat. ACTA Agron. Sin. 2016, 42, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kassam, A.; Friedrich, T.; Derpsch, R.; Kienzle, J. Overview of the Worldwide Spread of Conservation Agriculture. Available online: https://doaj.org/article/5ebd222c01734909b194ec21684a1c96 (accessed on 5 April 2025).
  6. Li, R.; Hou, X.; Jia, Z.; Han, Q.; Ren, X.; Yang, B. Effects on soil temperature, moisture, and maize yield of cultivation with ridge and furrow mulching in the rainfed area of the Loess Plateau, China. Agric. Water Manag. 2012, 116, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, E.; Martre, P.; Zhao, Z.; Ewert, F.; Maiorano, A.; Rötter, R.P.; Kimball, B.A.; Ottman, M.J.; Wall, G.W.; White, J.W.; et al. The uncertainty of crop yield projections is reduced by improved temperature response functions. Nat. Plants 2017, 3, 17102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, Y.; Xie, Z.; Malhi, S.S.; Vera, C.L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Effects of rainfall harvesting and mulching technologies on water use efficiency and crop yield in the semi-arid Loess Plateau, China. Agric. Water Manag. 2008, 96, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wu, L.; Quan, H.; Wu, L.; Zhang, X.; Feng, H.; Ding, D.; Siddique, K.H.M. Responses of winter wheat yield and water productivity to sowing time and plastic mulching in the Loess Plateau. Agric. Water Manag. 2023, 289, 108572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Steinmetz, Z.; Wollmann, C.; Schaefer, M.; Buchmann, C.; David, J.; Tröger, J.; Muñoz, K.; Frör, O.; Schaumann, G.E. Plastic mulching in agriculture. Plastic mulching in agriculture. Trading short-term agronomic benefits for long-term soil degradation? Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 550, 690–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bu, L.; Zhu, L.; Liu, J.; Luo, S.; Chen, X.; Li, S. Source–Sink Capacity Responsible for Higher Maize Yield with Removal of Plastic Film. Agron. J. 2013, 105, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Loughrin, J.H.; Kasperbauer, M.J. Aroma of Fresh Strawberries Is Enhanced by Ripening over Red versus Black Mulch. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 50, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Moreno, M.M.; Moreno, A. Effect of different biodegradable and polyethylene mulches on soil properties and production in a tomato crop. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Anikwe, M.A.N.; Mbah, C.N.; Ezeaku, P.I.; Onyia, V.N. Tillage and plastic mulch effects on soil properties and growth and yield of cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) on an ultisol in southeastern Nigeria. Soil. Tillage Res. 2006, 93, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ricotta, J.A.; Masiunas, J.B. The effects of black plastic mulch and weed control strategies on herb yield. HortScience 1991, 26, 539–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Eldoma, I.M.; Li, M.; Zhang, F.; Li, F.-M. Alternate or equal ridge–furrow pattern: Which is better for maize production in the rain-fed semi-arid Loess Plateau of China? Field Crops Res. 2016, 191, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mo, F.; Wang, J.-Y.; Xiong, Y.-C.; Nguluu, S.N.; Li, F.-M. Ridge-furrow mulching system in semiarid Kenya: A promising solution to improve soil water availability and maize productivity. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 80, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ye, J.; Gao, Z.; Wu, X.; Lu, Z.; Li, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Cui, G.; Yu, M.; Yan, G.; et al. Impact of increased temperature on spring wheat yield in northern China. Food Energy Secur. 2021, 10, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, S.; Yang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, W.; Hu, C.; Oenema, O. Responses of cereal yields and soil carbon sequestration to four Long-Term Tillage practices in the North China Plain. Agronomy 2022, 12, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Du, Z.; Ren, T.; Hu, C. Tillage and residue removal effects on soil carbon and nitrogen storage in the North China Plain. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2010, 74, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, W.; Hu, C.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Y. Tillage and residue management effects on soil carbon and CO2 emission in a wheat–corn double-cropping system. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosystems 2008, 83, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yu, C.; Mawodza, T.; Atkinson, B.S.; Atkinson, J.A.; Sturrock, C.J.; Whalley, R.; Hawkesford, M.J.; Cooper, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, H.; et al. The effects of soil compaction on wheat seedling root growth are specific to soil texture and soil moisture status. Rhizosphere 2023, 29, 100838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pittelkow, C.M.; Liang, X.; Linquist, B.A.; Van Groenigen, K.J.; Lee, J.; Lundy, M.E.; Van Gestel, N.; Six, J.; Venterea, R.T.; Van Kessel, C. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 2014, 517, 365–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, H.; Timilsina, A.; Chen, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, C.; Dong, W. Long-term conservation tillage practices affect total carbon and contribute to the formation of soil aggregates in the semi-arid North China Plain. Soil Use Manag. 2024, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chimento, C.; Amaducci, S. Characterization of fine root system and potential contribution to soil organic carbon of six perennial bioenergy crops. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 83, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mosaddeghi; Mahboubi, A.A.; Safadoust, A. Short-term effects of tillage and manure on some soil physical properties and maize root growth in a sandy loam soil in western Iran. Soil. Tillage Res. 2008, 104, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, J.; Qin, R.; Shi, X.; Wei, H.; Sun, G.; Li, F.-M.; Zhang, F. The effects of plastic film mulching and straw mulching on licorice root yield and soil organic carbon content in a dryland farming. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 826, 154113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, F.; Zhang, W.; Qi, J.; Li, F.-M. A regional evaluation of plastic film mulching for improving crop yields on the Loess Plateau of China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2017, 248, 458–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. O’Brien, P.L.; Daigh, A.L.M. Tillage practices alter the surface energy balance—A review. Soil. Tillage Res. 2019, 195, 104354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Porter, J.R.; Gawith, M. Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat: A review. Eur. J. Agron. 1999, 10, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qin, X.; Li, Y.; Han, Y.; Hu, Y.; Li, Y.; Wen, X.; Liao, Y.; Siddique, K.H.M. Ridge-furrow mulching with black plastic film improves maize yield more than white plastic film in dry areas with adequate accumulated temperature. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 262, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, J.; Zhan, A.; Bu, L.; Zhu, L.; Luo, S.; Chen, X.; Cui, Z.; Li, S.; Hill, R.L.; Zhao, Y. Understanding dry matter and nitrogen accumulation for High-Yielding Film-Mulched Maize. Agron. J. 2014, 106, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, H.; Hou, R.; Gong, Y.; Li, H.; Fan, M.; Kuzyakov, Y. Effects of 11 years of conservation tillage on soil organic matter fractions in wheat monoculture in Loess Plateau of China. Soil. Tillage Res. 2009, 106, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Drury, C.F.; Tan, C.; Welacky, T.W.; Oloya, T.O.; Hamill, A.S.; Weaver, S.E. Red clover and tillage influence on soil temperature, water content, and corn emergence. Agron. J. 1999, 91, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Subrahmaniyan, K.; Zhou, W. Soil Temperature Associated with Degradable, Non-Degradable Plastic and Organic Mulches and Their Effect on Biomass Production, Enzyme Activities and Seed Yield of Winter Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). J. Sustain. Agric. 2008, 32, 611–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wu, Y.; Perry, K.B.; Ristaino, J.B. Estimating temperature of mulched and bare soil from meteorological data. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1996, 81, 299–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Pei, D.; Sun, H.Y.; Chen, S.L. Effects of straw mulching on soil temperature, evaporation and yield of winter wheat: Field experiments on the North China Plain. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2007, 150, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yin, W.; Chai, Q.; Guo, Y.; Fan, H.; Fan, Z.; Hu, F.; Zhao, C.; Yu, A.; Coulter, J.A. No tillage with plastic re-mulching maintains high maize productivity via regulating hydrothermal effects in an arid region. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 649684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zapata, D.; Rajan, N.; Mowrer, J.; Casey, K.; Schnell, R.; Hons, F. Long-term tillage effect on with-in season variations in soil conditions and respiration from dryland winter wheat and soybean cropping systems. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sun, S.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, H.; Zhang, L. Black film mulching and plant density influencing soil water temperature conditions and maize root growth. Vadose Zone J. 2018, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qi, Z.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, L.; Feng, H.; Zhao, Y.; Si, B. Combined Effects of Mulch and Tillage on Soil Hydrothermal Conditions under Drip Irrigation in Hetao Irrigation District, China. Water 2016, 8, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gao, Y.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wu, B.; Niu, J. Soil water status and root distribution across the rooting zone in maize with plastic film mulching. Field Crops Res. 2013, 156, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Shi, Z.; Pan, W.; Liao, Y.; Li, T.; Qin, X. Response of root traits to plastic film mulch and its effects on yield. Soil. Tillage Res. 2021, 209, 104930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Q.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.; Chen, Y. Mulching improves yield and water-use efficiency of potato cropping in China: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 2018, 221, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Yin, W.; Chai, Q.; Guo, Y.; Feng, F.; Zhao, C.; Yu, A.; Hu, F. Analysis of Leaf Area Index Dynamic and Grain Yield Components of Intercropped Wheat and Maize under Straw Mulch Combined with Reduced Tillage in Arid Environments. J. Agric. Sci. 2016, 8, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dai, X.; Huo, Z.; Wang, H. Simulation for response of crop yield to soil moisture and salinity with artificial neural network. Field Crops Res. 2011, 121, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhao, J.; Liu, Z.; Lai, H.; Zhao, M.; Zhu, Q.; Zhao, C.; Yang, D.; Li, X. The impacts of soil tillage combined with plastic film management practices on soil quality, carbon footprint, and peanut yield. Eur. J. Agr. 2023, 148, 126881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, W.; Jin, C.; Guan, D.; Wang, Q.; Wang, A.; Yuan, F.; Wu, J. The effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on plant root traits: A meta-analysis. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2015, 82, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, G.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, H.; Fan, H.; Wen, X.; Han, J.; Liao, Y. Optimizing planting pattern and nitrogen application rate improves grain yield and water use efficiency for rain-fed spring maize by promoting root growth and reducing redundant root growth. Soil. Tillage Res. 2022, 220, 105385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Song, Q.; Zhang, F.; Li, X.; Yue, S.; Luo, Z.; Li, S. Understanding of maize root responses to changes in water status induced by plastic film mulching cultivation on the Loess Plateau, China. Agric. Water Manag. 2024, 301, 108932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pregitzer, K.S.; King, J.S.; Burton, A.J.; Brown, S.E. Responses of tree fine roots to temperature. N. Phytol. 2000, 147, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hatfield, J.L.; Prueger, J.H. Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather. Clim. Extrem. 2015, 10, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 2004, 304, 1623–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lobell, D.B.; Schlenker, W.; Costa-Roberts, J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 2011, 333, 616–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fageria, N.K.; Moreira, A. The role of mineral nutrition on root growth of crop plants. In Advances in Agronomy; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; pp. 251–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lynch, J.P. Steep, cheap and deep: An ideotype to optimize water and N acquisition by maize root systems. Ann. Bot. 2013, 112, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wasson, A.P.; Richards, R.A.; Chatrath, R.; Misra, S.C.; Prasad, S.V.S.; Rebetzke, G.J.; Kirkegaard, J.A.; Christopher, J.; Watt, M. Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat crops. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3485–3498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Hammer, G.L.; Dong, Z.; McLean, G.; Doherty, A.; Messina, C.; Schussler, J.; Zinselmeier, C.; Paszkiewicz, S.; Cooper, M. Can changes in canopy and/or root system architecture explain historical maize yield trends in the U.S. Corn Belt? Crop Sci. 2009, 49, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. White, R.G.; Kirkegaard, J.A. The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil—Implications for water uptake. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 33, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lynch, J.P. Root phenotypes for improved nutrient capture: An underexploited opportunity for global agriculture. N. Phytol. 2019, 223, 548–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Represents the schematic representation of the established experimental field plot design with 22 years of long-term conservation tillage practices on MC and NC, where a = MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC); b = MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC), and c = non-plastic film mulching (MC and NC). (B) Represents the method for root and soil sampling.
Figure 1. (A) Represents the schematic representation of the established experimental field plot design with 22 years of long-term conservation tillage practices on MC and NC, where a = MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC); b = MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC), and c = non-plastic film mulching (MC and NC). (B) Represents the method for root and soil sampling.
Agronomy 15 02607 g001
Figure 2. Shows monthly average air temperature (maximum, minimum, and average) and precipitation during the winter wheat crop growing season (2023–2024) in the experimental field area.
Figure 2. Shows monthly average air temperature (maximum, minimum, and average) and precipitation during the winter wheat crop growing season (2023–2024) in the experimental field area.
Agronomy 15 02607 g002
Figure 3. (a) Shows the dynamics of soil temperatures (°C) at depths of 0–40 cm in the afternoon, evening, and morning during the overwintering period of the winter wheat growing season. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). The vertical bars represent the LSD = 0.05 (n = 3); (b1) (Afternoon). Shows the dynamics of soil temperatures (°C) at depths of 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm in the afternoon, during the overwintering period of the winter wheat growing season. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). The vertical bars represent the LSD = 0.05 (n = 3). (b2) (Evening). Shows the dynamics of soil temperatures (°C) at depths of 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm in the evening, during the overwintering period of the winter wheat growing season. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). The vertical bars represent the LSD = 0.05 (n = 3). (b3) (Morning). Shows the dynamics of soil temperatures (°C) at depths of 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm in the evening, during the overwintering period of the winter wheat growing season. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). The vertical bars represent the LSD = 0.05 (n = 3).
Figure 3. (a) Shows the dynamics of soil temperatures (°C) at depths of 0–40 cm in the afternoon, evening, and morning during the overwintering period of the winter wheat growing season. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). The vertical bars represent the LSD = 0.05 (n = 3); (b1) (Afternoon). Shows the dynamics of soil temperatures (°C) at depths of 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm in the afternoon, during the overwintering period of the winter wheat growing season. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). The vertical bars represent the LSD = 0.05 (n = 3). (b2) (Evening). Shows the dynamics of soil temperatures (°C) at depths of 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm in the evening, during the overwintering period of the winter wheat growing season. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). The vertical bars represent the LSD = 0.05 (n = 3). (b3) (Morning). Shows the dynamics of soil temperatures (°C) at depths of 0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm in the evening, during the overwintering period of the winter wheat growing season. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). The vertical bars represent the LSD = 0.05 (n = 3).
Agronomy 15 02607 g003aAgronomy 15 02607 g003bAgronomy 15 02607 g003cAgronomy 15 02607 g003d
Figure 4. Shows average soil temperature (°C) at a soil depth of 0–40 cm during the morning, afternoon, and evening. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3).
Figure 4. Shows average soil temperature (°C) at a soil depth of 0–40 cm during the morning, afternoon, and evening. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3).
Agronomy 15 02607 g004
Figure 5. Shows soil temperature (°C) at different soil depths (0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm) during the afternoon, evening, and morning. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3).
Figure 5. Shows soil temperature (°C) at different soil depths (0, 5, 10, 20, and 40 cm) during the afternoon, evening, and morning. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3).
Agronomy 15 02607 g005
Figure 6. Shows Pearson correlation analysis of soil temperature (ST) and root characteristics (RCs) (a), ST and agronomic traits (b), and RC and agronomic traits (c). RLD = root length density, RWD = root weight density, RSA = root surface area. RV = root volume, RD = root diameter, AAST = afternoon average soil temperature, EAST = evening average soil temperature, MAST = morning average soil temperature, ASAT = afternoon accumulated soil temperature, EAST = evening accumulated soil temperature, MSAT = morning accumulated soil temperature, AST0 = average soil temperature at 0 cm, AST5 = average soil temperature at 5 cm, AST10 = average soil temperature at 10 cm, AST20 = average soil temperature at 20 cm, AST40 = average soil temperature at 40 cm, AGDM = aboveground dry matter, and ASMC = average soil moisture content (tillering to maturing). GY = grain yield, 1000 GW = grain weight, GN = grain number, SN = spike number, SY = straw yield, HI = harvest index.
Figure 6. Shows Pearson correlation analysis of soil temperature (ST) and root characteristics (RCs) (a), ST and agronomic traits (b), and RC and agronomic traits (c). RLD = root length density, RWD = root weight density, RSA = root surface area. RV = root volume, RD = root diameter, AAST = afternoon average soil temperature, EAST = evening average soil temperature, MAST = morning average soil temperature, ASAT = afternoon accumulated soil temperature, EAST = evening accumulated soil temperature, MSAT = morning accumulated soil temperature, AST0 = average soil temperature at 0 cm, AST5 = average soil temperature at 5 cm, AST10 = average soil temperature at 10 cm, AST20 = average soil temperature at 20 cm, AST40 = average soil temperature at 40 cm, AGDM = aboveground dry matter, and ASMC = average soil moisture content (tillering to maturing). GY = grain yield, 1000 GW = grain weight, GN = grain number, SN = spike number, SY = straw yield, HI = harvest index.
Agronomy 15 02607 g006
Figure 7. Shows normalized mean values (0–100) of root characteristics at different soil depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm). RLD = root length density, RSA = root surface area, RV = root volume, RD = root diameter, and RWD = root weight density. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC).
Figure 7. Shows normalized mean values (0–100) of root characteristics at different soil depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–40, and 40–60 cm). RLD = root length density, RSA = root surface area, RV = root volume, RD = root diameter, and RWD = root weight density. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC).
Agronomy 15 02607 g007
Figure 8. Shows soil moisture content (0–60 cm) under different treatments during the winter wheat growing season (Tillering, Jointing, Flowering, and Maturity stages, respectively). MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3).
Figure 8. Shows soil moisture content (0–60 cm) under different treatments during the winter wheat growing season (Tillering, Jointing, Flowering, and Maturity stages, respectively). MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC), and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC), and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3).
Agronomy 15 02607 g008
Figure 9. Shows PCA multivariate relationships among RCs, STs, and yield components. RLD = root length density, RWD = root weight density, RSA = root surface area. RV = root volume, RD = root diameter, AAST = afternoon average soil temperature, EAST = evening average soil temperature, MAST = morning average soil temperature, ASAT = afternoon accumulated soil temperature, EAST = evening accumulated soil temperature, MSAT = morning accumulated soil temperature, AST0 = average soil temperature at 0 cm, AST5 = average soil temperature at 5 cm, AST10 = average soil temperature at 10 cm, AST20 = average soil temperature at 20 cm, AST40 = average soil temperature at 40 cm, AGDM = aboveground dry matter, and ASMC = average soil moisture content. GY = grain yield, 1000 GW = grain weight, GN = grain number, SN = spike number, SY = straw yield, HI = harvest index.
Figure 9. Shows PCA multivariate relationships among RCs, STs, and yield components. RLD = root length density, RWD = root weight density, RSA = root surface area. RV = root volume, RD = root diameter, AAST = afternoon average soil temperature, EAST = evening average soil temperature, MAST = morning average soil temperature, ASAT = afternoon accumulated soil temperature, EAST = evening accumulated soil temperature, MSAT = morning accumulated soil temperature, AST0 = average soil temperature at 0 cm, AST5 = average soil temperature at 5 cm, AST10 = average soil temperature at 10 cm, AST20 = average soil temperature at 20 cm, AST40 = average soil temperature at 40 cm, AGDM = aboveground dry matter, and ASMC = average soil moisture content. GY = grain yield, 1000 GW = grain weight, GN = grain number, SN = spike number, SY = straw yield, HI = harvest index.
Agronomy 15 02607 g009
Table 1. Accumulated soil temperature from March to April (during the overwintering period). MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC, and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC, and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3). Significance levels at *** p ≤ 0.001, * p ≤ 0.05, and ns show not significant. Note: A = Tillage (Main plot), and B = PFM (split-plot).
Table 1. Accumulated soil temperature from March to April (during the overwintering period). MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC, and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC, and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3). Significance levels at *** p ≤ 0.001, * p ≤ 0.05, and ns show not significant. Note: A = Tillage (Main plot), and B = PFM (split-plot).
TimeTreatmentsAccumulated Soil Temperature (°C)
Soil Depth (cm)05102040
AfternoonMC588.00 Aa348.83 Ab268.83 Aa182.83 Ab170.13 Aa
MCB677.17 Ba391.23 Ba299.03 Bb205.17 Bb144.73 Bb
MCW639.67 Bb375.67 Bb308.87 Ba215.15 Ba150.47 Bb
NC595.17 Aa378.17 Aa243.17 Ab 185.30 Aa 153.73 Ab
NCB670.00 Ba279.67 Bd224.33 Bd163.67 Bd145.80 Bb
NCW661.50 Bab307.33 Bc242.17 Bc181.67 Bc170.18 Ba
PFM ***************
Tillage ns*********ns
Interaction *************
EveningMC287.67 Aa273.50 Ab255.67 Aa184.17 a165.90 Aa
MCB308.00 Ba311.50 Ba250.00 Bb173.67 d140.83 Bc
MCW292.33 Bb306.33 Bb275.17 Ba182.67 b 144.97 Bb
NC274.83 Ab281.67 Aa220.80 Ab175.17 c155.89 Ab
NCB280.00 Bc228.33 Bd208.33 Bd162.13 e 142.17 Bc
NCW263.00 Bd251.50 Bc222.67 Bc173.67 d161.27 Ba
PPM ***************
Tillage ***************
Interaction ***************
MorningMC107.83 Ab79.17 Ab102.50 Ab124.77 Aa174.53 Aa
MCB102.00 Bc80.10 Bd99.33 Bc116.10 Bb149.70 Bc
MCW103.50 Bc79.50 Bd97.83 Bc117.50 Bb152.87 Bb
NC148.50 Aa109.83 Aa116.17 Aa124.17 Aa157.01 Ab
NCB165.00 Ba89.17 Bc 106.00 Bb106.00 Bc146.33 Bd
NCW144.83 Bb100.50 Bb110.17 Ba120.50 Ba174.23 Ba
PFM ***************
Tillage ************ns
Interaction ***************
Table 2. Shows root characteristics (RCs) of different plastic and non-plastic under long-term conservation tillage practices. Root length, RLD = Root length density, RWD = Root weight density, RSA = root surface area. RV = root volume, RD = root diameter. Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3). Significance levels at *** p ≤ 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05, and ns show not significant. Note: A = Tillage (Main plot), and B = PFM (split-plot).
Table 2. Shows root characteristics (RCs) of different plastic and non-plastic under long-term conservation tillage practices. Root length, RLD = Root length density, RWD = Root weight density, RSA = root surface area. RV = root volume, RD = root diameter. Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3). Significance levels at *** p ≤ 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05, and ns show not significant. Note: A = Tillage (Main plot), and B = PFM (split-plot).
TreatmentsSoil Depth
(cm)
RLD
(cm cm−3)
SE
(±)
RWD
(g cm−3)
SE (±)RSA
(cm2)
SE
(±)
RV
(cm3)
SE
(±)
RD
(mm)
SE
(±)
MC0–103.85 Aa0.331.09 Aa0.04286.85 Aa27.192.71 Aa0.423.75 Aa0.29
MCB4.15 Ba0.01.15 Bab0.06277.03 Ba20.782.58 Ba0.153.73 Ba0.07
MCW4.59 Ba0.01.19 Ba0.07200.24 Bb37.741.92 Ba0.613.65 Ba0.51
NC3.45 Ab0.00.91 Ab0.15271.89 Aa28.412.51 Aa0.463.77 Aa0.35
NCB3.70 Bb0.40.88 Bb0.04281.93 Ba33.362.70 Ba0.343.82 Bb0.06
NCW3.62 Bb0.50.65 Bc0.1286.67 Bb40.021.78 Ba0.503.07 Ba0.21
Tillage (T)** *** ns ns *
FPM* * ** ns ns
Interaction
(T × FPM)
* ns ns ns ns
MC10–202.99 Ab0.360.13 Aa0.01125.18 Aa16.780.66 Aa0.102.10 Ab0.03
MCB3.74 Ba0.100.13 Ba0.01123.03 Bab23.510.63 Ba0.122.06 Bb0.02
MCW3.63 Ba0.310.10 Ba0.001100.47 Bab9.780.51 Ba0.042.05 Bb0.03
NC1.63 Ab0.420.09 Aa0.03103.32 Ab34.490.62 Aa0.162.50 Aa0.18
NCB0.88 Bb0.010.06 Ba0.00145.73 Bb2.420.30 Ba0.022.62 Ba0.04
NCW0.82 Bc0.070.09 Ba0.06180.23 Ba83.130.27 Ba0.032.60 Ba0.13
T*** ns * ns *
FPM* ns ns ns ns
Interaction
(T × FPM)
* ns ns ns ns
MC20–401.04 Aa0.120.04 Aa0.0194.83 Aa11.380.55 Aa0.052.37 Aa0.22
MCB1.06 Ba0.000.02 Ba0.0155.54 Bc17.420.38 Ba0.082.86 Ba0.37
MCW1.29 Ba0.040.05 Ba0.01103.73 Ba23.090.66 Ba0.122.60 Ba0.13
NC0.51 Ab0.420.03 Aa0.0152.32 Ab5.450.34 Aa0.042.58 Aa0.08
NCB0.64 Bb0.020.03 Ba0.0067.81 Bb8.420.45 Ba0.062.67 Ba0.10
NCW0.28 Bc0.050.02 Ba0.0126.29 Bd12.840.16 Ba0.082.32 Ba0.04
T*** ns * ns ns
FPMns ns ns ns ns
Interaction
(T × FPM)
ns ns ns ns ns
MC40–600.83 Aa0.220.04 Aa0.0188.70 Aa26.360.61 a0.172.76 a0.28
MCB0.63 Ba0.000.02 Ba0.0065.51 Ba2.990.43 Aa0.032.65 Aa0.18
MCW0.44 Ba0.020.02 Ba0.0142.39 Ba9.490.26 Ba0.072.40 Ba0.08
NC0.65 Aa0.130.03 Aa0.0167.65 Aa17.920.45 Aa0.102.68 Aa0.26
NCB0.54 Ba0.010.02 Ba0.0058.72 Ba8.320.41 Ba0.092.72 Ba0.27
NCW0.58 Ba0.090.02 Ba0.0061.56 Ba18.960.41 Ba0.132.68 Ba0.01
Tns ns ns ns ns
FPMns ns ns ns ns
Interaction
(T × FPM)
ns ns ns ns ns
Table 3. Grain yield and yield attributes under different tillage and mulching treatments. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC, and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC, and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). GY = grain yield, BM = biomass, AGDM = aboveground dry matter, 1000 GW = grain weight, SN = spike number, SY = straw yield, GN = grain number, and HI = harvest index. Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3). Significance levels at *** p ≤ 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05, and ns show not significant. Note: A = Tillage (Main plot), and B = PFM (split-plot).
Table 3. Grain yield and yield attributes under different tillage and mulching treatments. MC (moldboard plowing with crushed maize stalks mixed into the soil) and NC (no-tillage with crushed maize stalks left on the soil surface), MCB (black plastic film mulching on MC, and NCB (black plastic film mulching on NC), MCW (white plastic film mulching on MC, and NCW (white plastic film mulching on NC). GY = grain yield, BM = biomass, AGDM = aboveground dry matter, 1000 GW = grain weight, SN = spike number, SY = straw yield, GN = grain number, and HI = harvest index. Lowercase letters denote differences (p < 0.05) among the treatments (n = 3). Significance levels at *** p ≤ 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05, and ns show not significant. Note: A = Tillage (Main plot), and B = PFM (split-plot).
TreatmentsGY
(kg ha−1)
1000-GW
(g)
BM
(kg ha−1)
SN
(m−2)
SY
(kg ha−1)
GNHI
(%)
AGDM
(g plant−1)
MC7445 Aa39.65 Aab11,791 Aa552 Aa7893 Ab34.02 Aa48.5 Aa3.17 Aab
MCB8169 Ba41.00 Bab15,458 Ba566 Bab8190 Bab35.19 Ba49.9 Ba4.07 Bab
MCW8300 Ba41.07 Ba16,272 Ba572 Ba8499 Ba35.28 Ba49.4 Ba4.23 Ba
NC6590 Ab38.50 Ab13,244 Aa527 Ab7306 Ab32.43 Ab47.4 Aab2.79 Ab
NCB5486 Bb35.93 Bb11,315 Ba498 Bb6799 Bb30.57 Bb44.6 Bb3.78 Bb
NCW5794 Bb36.33 Bb12,942 Ba515 Bb6827 Bb30.97 Bb45.9 Bb3.49 Bbc
PFMnsnsnsnsnsNsns*
Tillage******ns************ns
Interaction*****ns**********ns
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, A.; Dong, W.; Liu, X.; Hu, C. Film Mulching Enhances Wheat Productivity in Tilled Systems but Not in No-Till Systems by Differentially Regulating Root-Zone Temperature During the Spring Season in the North China Plain. Agronomy 2025, 15, 2607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112607

AMA Style

Kumar A, Dong W, Liu X, Hu C. Film Mulching Enhances Wheat Productivity in Tilled Systems but Not in No-Till Systems by Differentially Regulating Root-Zone Temperature During the Spring Season in the North China Plain. Agronomy. 2025; 15(11):2607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112607

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Ameet, Wenxu Dong, Xiuwei Liu, and Chunsheng Hu. 2025. "Film Mulching Enhances Wheat Productivity in Tilled Systems but Not in No-Till Systems by Differentially Regulating Root-Zone Temperature During the Spring Season in the North China Plain" Agronomy 15, no. 11: 2607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112607

APA Style

Kumar, A., Dong, W., Liu, X., & Hu, C. (2025). Film Mulching Enhances Wheat Productivity in Tilled Systems but Not in No-Till Systems by Differentially Regulating Root-Zone Temperature During the Spring Season in the North China Plain. Agronomy, 15(11), 2607. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15112607

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop