Next Article in Journal
Allelopathic Activity of a Novel Compound and Two Known Sesquiterpene from Croton oblongifolius Roxb.
Previous Article in Journal
Implementation of Proximal and Remote Soil Sensing, Data Fusion and Machine Learning to Improve Phosphorus Spatial Prediction for Farms in Ontario, Canada
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unraveling the Tolerance of Moringa oleifera to Excess K through Increased N Absorption and Mg Use Efficiency

by
Bianca Cavalcante da Silva
1,*,
Jairo Osvaldo Cazetta
1 and
Renato de Mello Prado
2
1
Department of Agricultural, Livestock and Environmental Biotechnology, São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” UNESP/FCAV, Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil
2
Department of Soils and Fertilizers, São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” UNESP/FCAV, Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(4), 694; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040694
Submission received: 2 February 2024 / Revised: 7 March 2024 / Accepted: 14 March 2024 / Published: 28 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Plant-Crop Biology and Biochemistry)

Abstract

:
The tolerance of Moringa oleifera plants to excess K may be linked to nutritional mechanisms, but studies are lacking. The present study was conducted to analyze the tolerance of Moringa oleifera to nutritional imbalance and its importance in the growth of plants submitted to high doses of K in the absence and presence of N. The experiment was conducted in pots with 9 dm3 of Oxisol in a 4 × 2 factorial scheme, with potassium doses of 0, 110, 190, and 265 mg dm−3 combined with nitrogen doses of 0 and 100 mg dm−3. The increase in K uptake by moringa is enhanced by N supply but decreases the uptake of Ca and Mg. Notwithstanding, this was of little importance as the soil cultivated had adequate Ca and Mg contents and was sufficient for adequate plant nutrition without impairing plant growth. The moringa plant is tolerant to nutritional imbalances when grown in environments with high K content probably because N favors an increase in Mg use efficiency, avoiding biological disturbances. The results of this study contributed to our understanding of how moringa induces nutritional mechanisms of action to deal with excess K in crops.

1. Introduction

Moringa oleifera belongs to the family Moringaceae and is the most cultivated tree species of the genus Moringa [1]. It is native to Africa and occurs in South America and Southeast Asia [1], being used in human and animal nutrition [2]. Recent research on this species has focused mainly on bioactive compounds and antinutritional factors [3,4].
The optimal growth of plants depends on nutrients that perform well-known functions in physiological and biochemical processes. It is noteworthy that K and N are required in larger amounts by plants [5]. Thus, the doses of these elements are the highest in the cultivations, which increases the risk of nutritional imbalance.
Nutrient balance is important as it enhances plant metabolism, which explains the importance of studies on the interaction between nutrients [6]. Research often indicates that increased K in crops may interact with other nutrients such as Mg and Ca [7,8,9], decreasing the uptake of these elements depending on the species. This situation impairs the growth of crops such as maize, potato, sugarcane, and cherry tomato [10,11,12,13]. Excess K is more likely to have an antagonistic effect with cations, but a synergistic effect can also take place. However, reports on these effects are mainly restricted to rice and maize [14,15]. The interaction between K and Mg in plants can be antagonistic depending on plant species, cell type, leaf age, nutrient source, and draining organs [9].
Some studies indicate that N can increase or decrease plant K uptake depending on the chemical form absorbed. For instance, NNH4+ uptake can decrease K uptake in the plant [16] because the two cations have similar charges and hydrated diameters [17]. However, nitrogen application to tropical soils without excess soil moisture and compaction should favor nitrification. This would lead to a predominance of nitrate in the soil solution, making it the form most absorbed by plants [5]. In turn, N-NO3 uptake should favor K uptake. The literature reports this situation in different species, in which the NO3 ion serves as a mobile anion during K+ uptake and/or transport [18].
The importance of water absorption by the cells creates turgidity pressure in the cell walls, causing them to elongate and increasing cell volume [19]. The balance between water absorption by the roots and water loss due to transpiration results in the water status of the plant [20]. However, soils with high concentrations of neutral soluble salts impose salt stress on plants, which is detrimental to plant growth [21]. The plant also experiences stress in sodic soils, which have high concentrations of sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl) salts (soluble ionic salts) that impair plant development [21].
The reduction in CO2 assimilation by the chloroplasts is due to the factor mentioned above (salt stress) because of the stomata closing, the guard cells that are responsible for controlling stomatal opening to regulate water and gas exchange [21]. The structure of the guard cells is important for responding to changes in turgidity pressure, so the stomata close due to the decrease in osmotic pressure and the reduction in K+ content in the leaves [22]. Elevated Na+ and Cl concentrations in the sprouts cause an increase in osmotic pressure, resulting in the outflow of cellular water or a lower turgidity pressure, resulting in a decrease in the osmotic potential inside the cell [23].
The metabolic processes of plants are impaired by ionic disturbance, and the tissue becomes chlorotic. The simplistic fluctuations in osmotic pressure generate water loss from the cells and reduce water absorption [21]. When there is a lower supply of water to the plants, or due to some natural phenomenon such as a summer drought, there is a lower water content in the soil, which leads to an increase in salinity in the root zone due to the water potential gradient created by the plant roots that draw water into the root zone [21]. That is why it is important to provide the plant cells with an adequate supply of water and potassium for their ionic balance and optimal development.
Potassium deficit is a recurrent problem in cultivated areas worldwide as a significant part of K is removed at each harvest, which exceeds the K applied to crops [24]. The authors complement by indicating that potassium applications are typically low in soils with high K content (e.g., Latin American Southern Cone countries, North Africa, Western USA) due to a historical lack of crop yield responses. Thus, many cropping regions present high soil K content, especially those under intensive agriculture. Moreover, it is still poorly known whether K application in these areas with high soil K content may induce deficiency of other nutrients, especially if they are at low soil contents.
Thus, there are many unanswered questions on this subject. In the case of moringa, for instance, K can interact negatively with other elements, altering nutrient levels. Notwithstanding, it is necessary to know if this interaction is sufficient to cause deficiency at a level that could harm the biological functions of the nutrient in the plant and reduce its growth. It is also necessary to know whether N can affect the response of moringa plants grown in soils with high K content. In this regard, it is not yet known whether this species has the tolerance to maintain K and N homeostasis with other nutrients in plant shoots in a way that does not harm plant growth.
Therefore, to clarify the response of moringa to the interaction between K and N, we hypothesized that the increase in potassium fertilization in N-sufficient plants would enhance K absorption, but with little importance to cause a nutritional imbalance (especially in cations) that could reduce plant growth in soil with adequate fertility of other nutrients. If this hypothesis is confirmed, it will be possible to unravel why the imbalance of excess K in the other nutrients is not agronomically important. This may be linked to the fact that the soil cultivated is not deficient in cations, whereas the increase in plant N may enhance the efficiency of the use of these cations in the plant, avoiding possible disturbances in plant growth.
The present study was conducted to analyze the tolerance of Moringa oleifera to nutritional imbalance and its importance in the growth of plants submitted to high doses of K. The study further analyzes whether the supply or no supply of nitrogen affects the growth of plants grown in fertile soil.
If the hypothesis of this research is confirmed, it will show the important role of N in nutrient absorption and in the nutritional efficiency of the species. It would also confirm that the species can be cultivated in soils with high K content without risk of damage to crop growth. This is very important because these soils occur in different regions of the world [24].

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Development Conditions, Location, and Soil Characterization

The experiment was developed between July and November 2019. Moringa oleifera was grown under greenhouse conditions at the Paulista State University (UNESP), in Jaboticabal City, São Paulo State, Brazil. The site is located at the geographical coordinates 21°15′22″ south, 48°18′58″ west, at an altitude of 575 m. According to the Köppen classification, the climate is type Aw, in transition to Cwa. The experimental unit was a plastic pot filled with 9 dm3 of samples of a eutrophic Red Latosol [25], which corresponds to an Oxisol.
Meteorological data were monitored throughout the experiment using a digital thermohygrometer, recording the minimum temperature (14.7 ± 5 °C), maximum temperature (36.5 ± 7 °C), and relative humidity (31.6 ± 8%). Soil chemical analysis was performed already for fertility purposes according to the method described by Raij et al. [26]. The data presented the following results: pH (CaCl2): 5.8; organic matter (colorimetric): 10 g dm−3; P (anion exchange resin): 23 mg dm−3; S (turbidimetry): 5 mg dm−3; Ca: 31 mmolc dm−3; Mg: 14 mmolc dm−3; K: 1.8 mmolc dm−3; H+Al: 15 mmolc dm−3. Particle size analysis revealed the following results: coarse sand: 32%, fine sand: 20%, silt: 11%, and clay: 37%.

2.2. Treatments and Experimental Design

The treatments were arranged in a 4 × 2 factorial scheme consisting of four doses of K: 0, 110, 190, and 265 mg dm−3 of soil corresponding to 0, 220, 380, and 530 kg ha−1, respectively, and two conditions of N: 0 mg dm−3 (deficiency) and 100 mg dm−3 of soil (sufficiency). The experimental design used was entirely randomized with four replicates. The doses of K used followed Malavolta’s general recommendations (200 mg dm−3) [27], with lower and higher values.
Nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) sources were urea (NH2)2CO) and potassium chloride (KCl), respectively. The planting fertilization of moringa was performed with simple superphosphate to supply 60 mg dm−3 of P to the soil. The other macronutrients (Ca, Mg, and S) were present at adequate levels in the soil and were not applied. The following micronutrient fertilizers were applied: 0.5 mg dm−3 of B (H3BO3); 2.0 mg dm−3 of Mn (MnCl2·4H2O); 1.5 mg dm−3 of Zn (ZnSO4.7H2O); 1.0 mg dm−3 of Cu (CuSO4.5H2O); and 0.05 mg dm−3 of Mo (Na2MoO4·2H2O).
All fertilizers used in the experiment were properly incorporated into the soil volume of the pots before transplanting the seedlings.
Moringa seeds were sown in tubettes. After 10 days, the seedlings began to emerge and 15 days later they were transplanted into 9 kg pots filled with soil samples, keeping one plant per pot. Irrigations were performed with a sufficient volume of water to maintain moisture close to field capacity.

2.3. Evaluations

Nondestructive analyses started at 70 days after emergence (DAE) of the moringa plants, including the following evaluations:

2.3.1. Height, Number of Leaves, Chlorophyll, Fv/Fm, and Plant Dry Matter

For plant height determination, a cm tape measure was used covering from the neck of the seedling to the apex of the last fully expanded leaf. The number of leaves was determined by counting the compound leaves.
Chlorophyll content was measured by means of the SPAD index at 68 days after germination: the relative chlorophyll index in the seventh fully expanded leaf was estimated from the average of seven readings using the SPAD portable chlorophyll meter (Falker model, CFL 1030), from which the indirect chlorophyll A and B values were obtained, and by summing the values of the relative total chlorophyll index.
The efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) was analyzed by measuring the chlorophyll fluorescence at 69 days after germination. The readings were taken between 7 and 8 o’clock in the morning with a 30 min period of adaptation in the dark of the leaves using tweezers, before the excitation of the one-second red light pulse (saturation light source: set of red LEDs). To do this, certain parameters were taken into account: initial fluorescence, which is the minimum for chlorophyll excitation (F0), and the maximum fluorescence for chlorophyll excitation (Fm) was also analyzed. The difference between Fm and F0 results in variable fluorescence (Fv). Fv represents the flow of electrons from the PSII reaction center (P680) to plastoquinone. The maximum quantum yield is calculated as: Fv/Fm = (Fm − F0)/Fm. When a plant has its photosynthetic apparatus intact, the Fv/Fm ratio should vary between 0.75 and 0.85 [28], while a drop in this ratio reflects the presence of photoinhibitory damage to the PSII reaction centers [29]. The tweezers were attached to the median region of the seventh fully expanded leaf, using a portable fluorometer model (Opti-Sciences-Os30p+).
Leaf area (LA) was obtained considering the leaves, with the aid of an electronic area meter (LICOR model, LI 3100 A). The plants were separated into leaves, stem, and root and then the whole plant’s dry matter was obtained.

2.3.2. Macronutrient and Micronutrient Content in Leaf, Stem, and Root

Samples of the different plant organs leaf, stem, and root were taken to an oven with forced air circulation at a temperature of 65 ± 5 °C until reaching constant weight. Afterwards, the samples were ground in a Wiley mill and nutrient contents were determined. These samples were submitted to wet chemical analysis by nitric-perchloric digestion of macronutrients (P, K, Ca, Mg, and S) and micronutrients (Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn), with N being determined by sulfuric digestion according to the methodology proposed by Bataglia et al. [30].

2.3.3. Accumulation and Efficiency of Nutrient Use in the Shoots

From the contents of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Cu, Fe, and Mn and the value of dry matter, the accumulation of macronutrients and micronutrients in plant shoots was calculated. Shoot nutrient content was multiplied by shoot dry matter. Nutrient use efficiency was calculated as follows:
Shoot   nutrient   use   efficiency   ( g 2 g 1 ) = ( d r y   m a s s   ( g   p e r   s h o o t ) ) 2 n u t r i e n t   a c c u m u l a t i o n   ( g   p e r   s h o o t )
The numerator is expressed as the dry mass of the aerial part of the plant squared and in the denominator the accumulation of nutrients in the aerial part of the plant, according to Siddiqi and Glass [31].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The data were submitted for analysis of residual normality by the Shapiro–Wilk test. The homoscedasticity test was performed, with no evidence to reject the homogeneity of variances by the Levene test at 5% probability. Analysis of variance then verified the main effects (F test (p < 0.05)) and the means were tested by the Scott–Knott test at 5% probability. Subsequently, polynomial regression analysis was performed. Statistical analysis was performed in AgroEstat, and the graphs were created in SigmaPlot®.

3. Results

3.1. Biometric Variables

Nitrogen application favored the growth variables of moringa, but potassium application did not have this benefit (Table 1).

3.2. Macronutrient and Micronutrient Content in Leaf, Stem, and Root

The leaf contents of K, K/Mg, K/Ca, and Mn depend on the amount of K and N. The other nutrients are affected by the isolated effects of N and K or of only one nutrient (Table 2).
Leaf K contents depend on the doses of K and N. Potassium doses linearly increased K content in the presence of N. In the absence of N, however, the dose of 110 mg dm−3 of K expressed the lowest K content (Figure 1a).
Leaf K/Mg and K/Ca ratios depend on the doses of K and N. The increase in K doses under N sufficiency linearly increased K/Mg and K/Ca ratios; however, K/Mg and K/Ca ratios decreased under N deficiency (Figure 1b,c).
Leaf Mn content also depends on the doses of N and K. Increasing K doses linearly increased Mn content in the presence of N; however, leaf Mn content decreased in the absence of N (Figure 1d).
Nitrogen and potassium interacted for the stem contents of N, P, and K, and the K/Mg and K/Ca ratios (Table 2 and Figure 1e–i). The other nutrients are affected by the isolated effects of N and K or by only one nutrient (Table 2).
Increasing K doses reached the minimum stem N content at the calculated dose of 173.3 mg kg−1 K (Figure 1e). However, K doses did not differ in the absence of N.
Stem P content depended on the doses of K and N. The increase in K doses affected stem P only in the absence of N, reaching a minimum value at the calculated dose of 153.9 mg kg−1 K (Figure 1f).
Stem K content depends on the doses of N and K. This is because the increase in K doses under N sufficiency linearly increased K content. Under N deficiency, however, stem K content decreases (Figure 1g).
Stem K/Mg and K/Ca ratios depended on the doses of N and K. Increasing doses of K linearly increased these ratios only in the presence of N (Figure 1h,i).
In moringa roots, the contents of N, Mg, K/Mg, S, and Fe depended on the doses of K and N (Table 2). Root contents of P, Ca, K/Ca, and Mn were affected only by N application.
In the presence of nitrogen, potassium doses decreased root N content, reaching the minimum value at the calculated dose of 155 mg kg−1 K. In the absence of N, however, N content was not affected (Figure 1j). Root Mg contents also decreased linearly with the doses of K in the presence of N, there being no effect in the absence of N (Figure 1k). In the presence of nitrogen, potassium doses increased the root K/Mg ratio (Figure 1l). Root S content decreased linearly with K doses in the presence of N, but in the absence of N, there was no significant effect (Figure 1m). Moreover, root Fe content decreased linearly with K doses in the absence of N, but in the presence of N, there was no such effect (Figure 1n).

3.3. Shoot Nutrient Accumulation

Shoot accumulation of K, Ca, Mg, and Cu as well as the efficiency of use of K, Mg, and Cu depend on the doses of K and N. The other nutrients are affected by the isolated effects of N and K or of only one nutrient (Table 3).
The application of K linearly increased shoot K accumulation only in the presence of N. In the absence of N, this effect was not significant (Table 3, Figure 2a).
The application of K linearly decreased Ca and Mg accumulation in the presence of N. However, this did not occur in the absence of N (Figure 2b,c). The application of K linearly increased shoot Cu accumulation in the presence of N. Notwithstanding, this effect did not occur in the absence of N (Figure 2d).
The nutrient use efficiencies (NUE) of K, Mg, and Cu (Table 3 and Figure 2e–g) depend on the doses of N and K. The application of K in the presence of N quadratically increased the use efficiency of K and Cu in the plants (Figure 2e,g). Furthermore, the supply of K in the presence of N increased Mg use efficiency in the plant with a linear adjustment, with no effect in the absence of N (Figure 2f).

4. Discussion

The effects of the interaction between nutrients, especially N and K, begin with the acquisition of nutrients by the plants and reflect the levels of these nutrients in the different organs of the plant. Such effects may generate a nutritional deficiency whose intensity is species-dependent [5]. In moringa, it still remains unknown whether the increase in plant K content can alter the contents of the other nutrients and whether this effect can be enhanced or minimized in plants with different nutritional status of N.
In moringa plants, the present research evidenced that increasing the amount of K had a significant effect on the increase both in K and K/Ca contents in the leaf and stem organs of moringa and in the K/Mg ratio in all plant organs, but only in N-sufficient plants. Some authors showed similar results, with an increase in the K/Mg ratio with an increase in the amount of K [32,33].
The increase in plant K had little importance in decreasing plant Mg content because it did not affect the leaves or stems, only restricting the roots in plants that received N. The effects of a K increase on the contents of micronutrients in the plant occurred only in the plants that did not receive N and were restricted to Mn in the leaves and Fe in the roots, with a decrease in the contents of these elements.
It was clear that N favors the absorption of K in moringa plants because there was an increase in shoot K accumulation due to the increase in K doses (Figure 2a), a fact also observed in guava trees [34]. Potassium transporters have nitrogen in their composition, which is important for the absorption of this macronutrient [5]. In this regard, NNH4+ constitutes a sensitive component of K uptake probably because it is mediated by KT/HAK/KUP transporters (HAK1-like transporters), while the inward rectifier K channels (AKT1-like channels) constitute the NNH4+ insensitive pathway [35,36].
Furthermore, increased K accumulation in the shoots decreased Ca accumulation (Figure 2b) and Mg accumulation (Figure 2c) and increased Cu accumulation in the shoots (Figure 2d), but this occurred only in N-sufficient plants. The effects of excess K on the plant are restricted to risks of imbalance of only three nutrients (Ca, Mg, and Cu) in moringa shoots, and limited in N-sufficient plants. It is possible that the increase in K decreased the uptake of Ca and Mg due to the greater degree of hydration of these nutrients, with greater competition for active uptake sites [5,37].
Our research showed a decrease in K use efficiency with increasing doses of K in the presence of N. This fact normally occurs with all nutrients: When the content in the plant increases, the nutrient metabolism efficiency decreases. It was even clear that moringa did not respond to the application of K regardless of N, indicating that the K content of this soil (1.8 mmolc dm−3) is already adequate for the crop. Therefore, this species is not very responsive to K application in soils with K content equal to or greater than 1.8 mmolc dm−3, possibly due to the good K use efficiency by the plant. Other authors have also mentioned the low response of moringa to K supply [38,39,40].
Regarding the decrease in the accumulation of nutrients such as Ca and Mg in moringa plants with increasing doses of K in the presence of N discussed earlier, it can be stated that it probably did not have agronomic importance because it was not sufficient to decrease plant dry matter. This occurred because the increase in K doses in the presence of N did not cause physiological damage in the plants as it did not diminish the chlorophyll content nor the Fv/Fm (photosynthetic efficiency), thus not affecting plant height, number of leaves, or foliar area. Potassium disturbance may decrease Fv/Fm given the increase in reactive oxygen species [41], a fact that did not happen in this study.
The results of the present research are sufficient to confirm the hypothesis indicating that increased potassium fertilization in N-sufficient compared to N-deficient plants would enhance K uptake. However, this effect is not enough to cause a nutritional imbalance (especially in cations) that could decrease moringa growth in soil with adequate fertility of other nutrients.
Therefore, the research revealed that excess K imbalance, especially in reducing the absorption of Ca and Mg, did not cause physiological or agronomic damage to the plant. This may be linked to the fact that the soil cultivated did not present a deficiency of these cations because Ca and Mg contents were equal to 31 and 14 mmolc dm−3, respectively, which are considered high or adequate for moringa cultivation [26]. These Ca and Mg contents obtained are due to limestone application, which contributed to an increase in the availability of these nutrients in the soil [26,42]. This reinforces the indication that the negative interaction of a given nutrient such as K on the second nutrient is only of agronomic importance if the second nutrient, for example, Ca and Mg, has a deficient content in the soil [5], which did not occur in our study.
Another aspect that reinforces the little importance of the decrease in the absorption of Ca and especially Mg in the function of the increase in K doses in the presence of N is the increase in Mg use efficiency, which contributed to avoiding disturbances in plant growth. Thus, N played an important role in increasing Mg use efficiency in moringa plants. This has to do with the associated functions of these nutrients in plant metabolism, e.g., both are involved in protein synthesis. For example, one of the functions of N is to form the amino acids used for protein synthesis that occurs in ribosomes, but this will occur only in the presence of Mg since the active form of ribosomes requires aggregation of two subunits, requiring Mg to form a bridge between the subunits [37]. In addition, N and Mg have structural functions, coparticipating with different organic compounds vital to plants, with a highlight on chlorophyll [5]. Chlorophyll biosynthesis begins with the insertion of Mg into protoporphyrin IX, which is catalyzed by Mg-chelatase, an enzyme consisting of 40, 70, and 140 kDa subunits, respectively, called ChlI, Child, and ChlH subunits [8].
Our findings propose that the nutritional imbalance induced by the increase in K can be mitigated by combining crops grown on soils with optimal Ca and Mg contents and with optimal nitrogen fertilization. The choice of species should consider those that present high nutritional efficiency, such as moringa. Therefore, the results of this research provide further evidence for studies on other species, with global implications. This occurs because several growing regions have high K content, especially under intensive agriculture in systems without K losses through leaching, which is common in regions with low rainfall and soils with clayey texture.

5. Conclusions

The effects of the interaction between nutrients, mainly N and K, begin with the acquisition of nutrients by plants and reflect the levels of these nutrients in different plant organs.
The increase in K uptake by moringa is enhanced by N supply but decreases the uptake of Ca and Mg. Notwithstanding, this was of little importance as the soil cultivated had adequate Ca and Mg contents and was sufficient for adequate plant nutrition without impairing plant growth.
The moringa plant is tolerant to nutritional imbalances when grown in environments with high K content probably because N favors an increase in Mg use efficiency, avoiding biological disturbances.
The results of this study contributed to our understanding of how moringa induces nutritional mechanisms of action to deal with excess K in crops.

Author Contributions

B.C.d.S., J.O.C. and R.d.M.P. performed field trials, collected data, and performed laboratory analyses. B.C.d.S. performed statistical analyses. B.C.d.S., J.O.C. and R.d.M.P. produced the manuscript. B.C.d.S., J.O.C. and R.d.M.P. contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) under number 140525/2021-1.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The experimental area of this research was in a public place located at the Paulista State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” UNESP-FCAV, Jaboticabal Campus—São Paulo, Brazil.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from UNESP (Universidade Estadual Paulista) on behalf of the Postgraduate Agronomy Program (Soil Science), CNPq (National Council for the Development of Science and Technology) e a CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders did not participate in experimental setup, data collection, analysis or interpretation, writing of the manuscript, and publication of results.

References

  1. Adefa, T.; Tefera, M. Heavy Metal Accumulation and Health Risk Assessment in Moringa Oleifera from Awi Zone, Ethiopia. Chem. Afr. 2020, 3, 1073–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tiloke, C.; Anand, K.; Gengan, R.M.; Chuturgoon, A.A. Moringa Oleifera and Their Phytonanoparticles: Potential Antiproliferative Agents against Cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Devisetti, R.; Sreerama, Y.N.; Bhattacharya, S. Processing Effects on Bioactive Components and Functional Properties of Moringa Leaves: Development of a Snack and Quality Evaluation. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Benhammouche, T.; Melo, A.; Martins, Z.; Faria, M.A.; Pinho, S.C.M.; Ferreira, I.M.L.P.V.O.; Zaidi, F. Nutritional Quality of Protein Concentrates from Moringa Oleifera Leaves and in Vitro Digestibility. Food Chem. 2021, 348, 128858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. de Mello Prado, R. Mineral Nutrition of Tropical Plants; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; ISBN 978-3-030-71261-7. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kumar, S.; Kumar, S.; Mohapatra, T. Interaction between Macro- and Micro-Nutrients in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 665583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rodrigues, A.A.; Mendonça, R.M.N.; Silva, A.P.d.; Silva, S.d.M. Nutrição Mineral e Produção de Abacaxizeiro “Pérola”, Em Função Das Relações K/N Na Adubação. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2013, 35, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tränkner, M.; Tavakol, E.; Jákli, B. Functioning of Potassium and Magnesium in Photosynthesis, Photosynthate Translocation and Photoprotection. Physiol. Plant 2018, 163, 414–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xie, K.; Cakmak, I.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F.; Guo, S. Synergistic and Antagonistic Interactions between Potassium and Magnesium in Higher Plants. Crop J. 2021, 9, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ertiftik, H.; Zengin, M. Response of Maize for Grain to Potassium and Magnesium Fertilizers in Soils with High Lime Contents. J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 40, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Koch, M.; Busse, M.; Naumann, M.; Jákli, B.; Smit, I.; Cakmak, I.; Hermans, C.; Pawelzik, E. Differential Effects of Varied Potassium and Magnesium Nutrition on Production and Partitioning of Photoassimilates in Potato Plants. Physiol. Plant 2019, 166, 921–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rhodes, R.; Miles, N.; Hughes, J.C. Interactions between Potassium, Calcium and Magnesium in Sugarcane Grown on Two Contrasting Soils in South Africa. Field Crops Res. 2018, 223, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guan, X.; Liu, D.; Liu, B.; Wu, C.; Liu, C.; Wang, X.; Zou, C.; Chen, X. Critical Leaf Magnesium Concentrations for Adequate Photosynthate Production of Soilless Cultured Cherry Tomato—Interaction with Potassium. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ding, Y.; Luo, W.; Xu, G. Characterisation of Magnesium Nutrition and Interaction of Magnesium and Potassium in Rice. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2006, 149, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bedi, A.S.; Sekhon, G.S. Effect of Potassium and Magnesium Application to Soils on the Dry-Matter Yield and Cation Composition of Maize. J. Agric. Sci. 1977, 88, 753–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, S.; Shen, Q.; Brueck, H. Effects of Local Nitrogen Supply on Water Uptake of Bean Plants in a Split Root System. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2007, 49, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, M.Y.; Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M. Interactions between K+ and NH4+: Effects on Ion Uptake by Rice Roots. Plant Cell Environ. 1996, 19, 1037–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pettersson, S. Effects of Nitrate on Influx, Efflux and Translocation of Potassium in Young Sunflower Plants. Physiol. Plant 1984, 61, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cosgrove, D.J. Plant Cell Wall Extensibility: Connecting Plant Cell Growth with Cell Wall Structure, Mechanics, and the Action of Wall-Modifying Enzymes. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 463–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kudoyarova, G.; Arkhipova, T.; Veselov, D. Correction to: Water Relations in Plants Treated with Growth Promoting Rhizosphere Bacteria. Plant Soil 2024, 494, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, H.; Todd, J.L.; Luo, H. Turfgrass Salinity Stress and Tolerance—A Review. Plants 2023, 12, 925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Qi, J.; Song, C.; Wang, B.; Zhou, J.; Kangasjärvi, J.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z. Reactive Oxygen Species Signaling and Stomatal Movement in Plant Responses to Drought Stress and Pathogen Attack. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 805–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mostofa, M.G.; Rahman, M.M.; Ghosh, T.K.; Kabir, A.H.; Abdelrahman, M.; Rahman Khan, M.A.; Mochida, K.; Tran, L.-S.P. Potassium in Plant Physiological Adaptation to Abiotic Stresses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 186, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Majumdar, K.; Norton, R.M.; Murrell, T.S.; García, F.; Zingore, S.; Prochnow, L.I.; Pampolino, M.; Boulal, H.; Dutta, S.; Francisco, E.; et al. Assessing Potassium Mass Balances in Different Countries and Scales. In Improving Potassium Recommendations for Agricultural Crops; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 283–340. [Google Scholar]
  25. Santos, d.H.G.; Jacomine, P.K.T.; Anjos, d.L.H.C.; Oliveira, d.V.A.; Lumbreras, J.F.; Coelho, M.R.; Almeida, d.J.A.; Araujo Filho, d.J.C.; Oliveira, d.J.B.; Cunha, T.J.F. Sistema Brasileiro de Classificação de Solos, 5th ed.; Embrapa: Brasília, Brazil, 2018; ISBN 9788570358004. [Google Scholar]
  26. Raij, B.V.; Cantarella, H.; Quaggio, J.A.; Furlani, A.M.C. Lime and Fertilizer Recommendations for the State of São Paulo, 2nd ed.; (Technical Bulletin, 100); Instituto Agronômico: Campinas, Brazil, 1997; pp. 1–285. [Google Scholar]
  27. Malavolta, E. Handbook of Agricultural Chemistry Fertilisers and Fertilisation. Agron. Ceres 1981, 1–596. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bolhar-Nordenkampf, H.R.; Long, S.P.; Baker, N.R.; Oquist, G.; Schreiber, U.; Lechner, E.G. Chlorophyll Fluorescence as a Probe of the Photosynthetic Competence of Leaves in the Field: A Review of Current Instrumentation. Funct. Ecol. 1989, 3, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Demmig, B.; Björrkman, O. Comparison of the Effect of Excessive Light on Chlorophyll Fluorescence (77K) and Photon Yield of O2 Evolution in Leaves of Higher Plants. Planta 1987, 171, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bataglia, O.C.; Furlani, A.M.C.; Teixeira, J.A.F.; Furlani, P.R.; Gallo, J.R. Methods for Analysing Plant Chemistry; Agronomic Institute of Campinas: Campinas, Brazil, 1983; pp. 1–596. [Google Scholar]
  31. Siddiqi, M.Y.; Glass, A.D.M. Utilization Index: A Modified Approach to the Estimation and Comparison of Nutrient Utilization Efficiency in Plants. J. Plant Nutr. 1981, 4, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Veloso, C.A.C.; Oeiras, A.H.L.; Carvalho, E.J.M.; Souza, F.R.S. Response of Pineapple to the Addition of Nitrogen, Potassium and Limestone in a Yellow Oxisol in Northeast Paraense. Braz. J. Frutic. 2001, 23, 396–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Spironello, A.; Quaggio, J.A.; Teixeira, L.A.J.; Furlani, P.R.; Sigrist, J.M.M. Pineapple Yield and Fruit Quality Effected by NPK Fertilization in a Tropical Soil. Rev. Bras. Frutic. 2004, 26, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dias, M.J.T.; Souza, H.A.; Natale, W.; Modesto, V.C.; Rozane, D. Fertilization with Nitrogen and Potassium in Guava Seedlings in a Commercial Nursery. Semant. Sch. Semin. 2012, 33, 2837–2848. [Google Scholar]
  35. Santa-María, G.E.; Danna, C.H.; Czibener, C. High-Affinity Potassium Transport in Barley Roots. Ammonium-Sensitive and -Insensitive Pathways. Plant Physiol. 2000, 123, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nieves-Cordones, M.; Alemán, F.; Martínez, V.; Rubio, F. K+ Uptake in Plant Roots. The Systems Involved, Their Regulation and Parallels in Other Organisms. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 688–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Marschner, P. Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; ISBN 9780123849052. [Google Scholar]
  38. Vieira, H.; Helena, L.; Chaves, G.; Viégas, R.A. Diagnosis of Macronutrient Deficiency Symptoms in Seedlings of Moringa (Moringa Oleifera). Cerne 2007, 13, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
  39. Vieira, H.; Helena, L.; Chaves, G.; Viégas, R.A. Nutrient Accumulation In Moringa Seedlings (Moringa Oleifera Lam) Under Macronutrient Omission. J. Agron. Sci. 2008, 39, 130–136. [Google Scholar]
  40. Soares, P.P.d.S.; Mesquita, N.L.S.; Almeida, J.R.; Coutrim, R.L.; Cairo, P.A.R.; Silva, L.D. Growth, Root Quality and Nitrate Reductase Activity in Radish Plants Subjected to Doses of Potassium and Nitrogen Sources. Sci. Plena 2020, 16, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, N.; Hua, H.; Egrinya Eneji, A.; Li, Z.; Duan, L.; Tian, X. Genotypic Variations in Photosynthetic and Physiological Adjustment to Potassium Deficiency in Cotton (Gossypium Hirsutum). J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2012, 110, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Meurer, E.J.; Potássio, I.F.M.S. (Eds.) Plant Mineral Nutrition; Brazilian Society of Soil Science: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2006; pp. 281–298. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. K (a), K:Mg (b), K:Ca (c), and Mn (d) contents in the leaf; N (e), P (f), K (g), K:Mg (h), and K:Ca (i) in the stem; N (j), Mg (k), K:Mg (l), S (m), and Fe (n) in the root of Moringa oleifera seedlings at 70 days after emergence as a function of N and K interaction.
Figure 1. K (a), K:Mg (b), K:Ca (c), and Mn (d) contents in the leaf; N (e), P (f), K (g), K:Mg (h), and K:Ca (i) in the stem; N (j), Mg (k), K:Mg (l), S (m), and Fe (n) in the root of Moringa oleifera seedlings at 70 days after emergence as a function of N and K interaction.
Agronomy 14 00694 g001aAgronomy 14 00694 g001b
Figure 2. Shoot accumulation of K (g plant−1) (a), Ca (g plant−1) (b), Mg (g plant−1) (c), and Cu (g plant−1) (d); use efficiency of shoot K (e), shoot Mg (f), and shoot Cu (g) in Moringa oleifera seedlings at 70 days after emergence as a function of N and K interaction.
Figure 2. Shoot accumulation of K (g plant−1) (a), Ca (g plant−1) (b), Mg (g plant−1) (c), and Cu (g plant−1) (d); use efficiency of shoot K (e), shoot Mg (f), and shoot Cu (g) in Moringa oleifera seedlings at 70 days after emergence as a function of N and K interaction.
Agronomy 14 00694 g002
Table 1. Summary of analysis of variance for total chlorophyll, quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), height (H), number of leaves (NL), leaf area (LA), and dry matter (DM) of Moringa oleifera seedlings as a function of N and K doses. *: significant at 5% probability, **: significant at 1% probability, ns: not significant.
Table 1. Summary of analysis of variance for total chlorophyll, quantum efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), height (H), number of leaves (NL), leaf area (LA), and dry matter (DM) of Moringa oleifera seedlings as a function of N and K doses. *: significant at 5% probability, **: significant at 1% probability, ns: not significant.
NutrientTotal ChlorophyllFv/FmH (cm)NLLADM
N229.51 **83.05 **276.76 **37.71 **268.20 **313.02 **
K0.39 ns0.41 ns2.32 ns1.55 ns1.75 ns2.13 ns
N × K1.07 ns2.13 ns0.17 ns0.43 ns1.64 ns0.73 ns
MSE2.480.015.190.77104.792.13
CV%11.382.929.099.9514.1910.31
MSE: mean standard error; CV%: variation coefficient.
Table 2. F test indicating significance (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; and ns: p > 0.05) for nutrient contents in leaf, stem, and root in moringa as a function of treatments.
Table 2. F test indicating significance (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; and ns: p > 0.05) for nutrient contents in leaf, stem, and root in moringa as a function of treatments.
NPKCaMgK/MgK/CaSCuFeMnZn
Leaf
N97.4 **10.5 **56.4 **32.5 *7.7 **3.6 ns2.4 ns175 **11.0 *9.5 **1.3 ns32.5 **
K2.1 ns1.31 ns3.39 **3.6 *3.6 *5.7 **5.8 **3.6 *0.5 ns0.4 ns0.7 ns0.5 ns
N × K1.2 ns2.5 ns3.45 **1.6 ns2.3 ns3.7 *3.4 *0.8 ns0.6 ns1.4 ns4.3 *1.5 ns
Stem
N25.1 **214.2 **1.7 ns64.7 **36.5 **2.9 ns24.8 **36.3 **9.5 **0.5 ns9.4 **6.00 *
K1.2 ns2.1 ns0.5 ns1.5 ns0.8 ns8.3 **24.4 **0.8 ns0.8 ns0.2 ns0.5 ns0.32 ns
N × K3.7 *3.2 *5.8 **1.2 ns0.3 ns5.6 **11.3 **0.03 ns0.2 ns0.3 ns0.4 ns0.80 ns
Root
N84.2 **191.8 **0.6 ns4.5 **8.8 **18.2 **9.8 **34.6 **2.7 ns5.2 *5.6 **2.8 ns
K2.8 ns2.2 ns0.5 ns1.3 ns3.0 ns5.3 **2.4 ns2.0 ns0.4 ns2.1 ns0.2 ns0.8 ns
N × K5.2 **1.2 ns0.5 ns0.8 ns3.6 *3.6 *0.8 ns5.3 **0.5 ns4.8 **0.4 ns1.0 ns
Table 3. F test indicating significance (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; and ns: p > 0.05) for nutrient accumulation in moringa shoots as a function of treatments.
Table 3. F test indicating significance (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; and ns: p > 0.05) for nutrient accumulation in moringa shoots as a function of treatments.
Shoot Nutrient Accumulation (g per Plant)
Source of VariationNPKCaMgSCuFeMnZn
N733.6 **405.8 **420.4 **354.7 **207.6 **334.6 **149.6 **12.6 **118.9 **282.0 **
K1.26 ns2.87 **21.0 **1.75 ns4.78 **2.2 ns7.9 **0.31 ns2.32 ns0.41 ns
N × K1.26 ns0.85 ns11.18 **4.49 *9.84 **0.75 ns5.94 **1.59 ns2.15 ns0.67 ns
MSE0.060.0090.090.040.010.040.023.680.50.08
CV%14.411.313.312.317.311.127.281.128.019.5
Nutrient Use Efficiency (g2 per g)
Source of VariationNUE
N
NUE
P
NUE
K
NUE
Ca
NUE
Mg
NUE
S
NUE
Cu
NUE
Fe
NUE
Mn
NUE
Zn
N242.2 **457.2 **119.1 **598.6 **352.1 **348.5 **262.7 **108.8 **171.4 **202.8 **
K2.9 ns0.4 ns3.1 *6.2 **9.4 **0.6 ns11.4 **1.9 ns0.09 ns0.6 ns
N × K0.4 ns0.04 ns4.75 **1.8 ns5.5 *0.06 ns17.1 **2.2 ns1.31 ns0.4 ns
MSE45.6264.662.255.5299.570.8445.110.418.160.1
CV%16.519.1435.516.521.922.521.035.027.423.3
MSE: mean standard error; CV%: variation coefficient.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

da Silva, B.C.; Cazetta, J.O.; de Mello Prado, R. Unraveling the Tolerance of Moringa oleifera to Excess K through Increased N Absorption and Mg Use Efficiency. Agronomy 2024, 14, 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040694

AMA Style

da Silva BC, Cazetta JO, de Mello Prado R. Unraveling the Tolerance of Moringa oleifera to Excess K through Increased N Absorption and Mg Use Efficiency. Agronomy. 2024; 14(4):694. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040694

Chicago/Turabian Style

da Silva, Bianca Cavalcante, Jairo Osvaldo Cazetta, and Renato de Mello Prado. 2024. "Unraveling the Tolerance of Moringa oleifera to Excess K through Increased N Absorption and Mg Use Efficiency" Agronomy 14, no. 4: 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14040694

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop