Next Article in Journal
Appropriate Water and Nitrogen Regulation Improves the Production of Wolfberry (Lycium barbarum L.)
Next Article in Special Issue
Differences in Soil Microflora between the Two Chinese Geographical Indication Products of “Tricholoma matsutake Shangri-la” and “T. matsutake Nanhua”
Previous Article in Journal
Oliviculture and Viticulture Crop Byproducts Use for Peat Partial Substitution for Carnation Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nutritional Composition, Antioxidant Activity, Cytotoxicity, and Enzymatic Potential of Ficus nitida-Associated Tomophagus colossus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nano-Food Farming: Toward Sustainable Applications of Proteins, Mushrooms, Nano-Nutrients, and Nanofibers

by
József Prokisch
1,*,
Greta Törős
1,
Duyen H. H. Nguyen
1,2,3,
Chaima Neji
4,
Aya Ferroudj
1,
Daniella Sári
1,
Arjun Muthu
1,
Eric C. Brevik
5 and
Hassan El-Ramady
1,6,*
1
Institute of Animal Science, Biotechnology and Nature Conservation, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, 138 Böszörményi Street, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
2
Doctoral School of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
3
Tay Nguyen Institute for Scientific Research, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 118 Xo Viet Nghe Tinh Street, Da Lat 70072, Vietnam
4
Institute of Nutrition, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management, University of Debrecen, Böszörményi út 138, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary
5
College of Agricultural, Life, and Physical Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901, USA
6
Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, 33516 Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(3), 606; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030606
Submission received: 25 January 2024 / Revised: 7 March 2024 / Accepted: 14 March 2024 / Published: 18 March 2024

Abstract

:
The relationship between agriculture and food is very close. It is impossible to produce adequate crops for global food security without proper farm management. Farming practices represent direct and indirect controlling factors in terms of global food security. Farming management practices influence agro-food production from seed germination through to the post-harvest treatments. Nano-farming utilizes nanotechnologies for agricultural food production. This review covers four key components of nano-farming: nano-mushroom production, protein-based nanoparticles, nano-nutrients, and nanofibers. This provides a comprehensive overview of the potential applications of nanotechnology in agriculture. The role of these components will be discussed in relation to the challenges faced and solutions required to achieve sustainable agricultural production. Edible mushrooms are important to food security because they are a nutritious food source and can produce nanoparticles that can be used in the production of other food sources. Protein-based nanoparticles have considerable potential in the delivery of bioactives as carriers and other applications. Nano-nutrients (mainly nano-selenium, nano-tellurium and carbon nanodots) have crucial impacts on the nutrient status of plant-based foods. Carbon nanodots and other carbon-based nanomaterials have the potential to influence agricultural crops positively. There are promising applications of nanofibers in food packaging, safety and processing. However, further research is needed to understand the impacts and potential risks of nanomaterials in the food production system.

1. Introduction

Due to the world’s growing population (more than 8.09 billion people), long-term global food security is a serious concern [1]. Such security requires a 70% increase in global food production by 2050 to meet projected population growth [2]. Global agri-food production faces many problems associated with intensive farming under climate change, including soil degradation [3,4], decreased water quality [5], and biodiversity loss [6,7]. Agriculture is humanity’s main source of food [8]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the conservation of the natural resources agriculture relies on, including soil and water [9]. Therefore, sustainable agriculture is a crucial approach to achieve global food security. Several strategies have been proposed to achieve sustainable agriculture, including genetic engineering of agricultural crops [10,11], use of nanotechnology [12,13,14], meeting the sustainable development goals [15], application of bacteriophages [16], nano-enabled precision farming [12,17], and nano-enabled seed treatments [18,19].
Several reports have been published on the benefits of nanotechnology for sustainable agriculture, such as controlling agro-processes [20], enhancing food quality and safety [21], reducing agro-inputs [22], effective agrochemical delivery [23,24], detecting abiotic/biotic stresses in plants [25,26], mitigating abiotic/biotic stresses in plants [17,27], and enhancing the uptake of nutrients from soil [28,29]. Therefore, nano-enabled technology has great potential for promoting sustainable agriculture by revolutionizing agro-practices, leading to reduced losses and increasing the efficiency of inputs [22]. Many agricultural nano-formulations are considered “new-age materials”, with a wide variety of nano-insecticides, nano-herbicides, nano-fungicides, and nano-fertilizers available [22].
Nano-farming can be defined as the application of nanomaterials during and post-farming to produce food products, or as the application of nanotechnology for agri-food production [21,30,31,32]. Research on nano-farming systems has focused on food production through cropping systems [33,34] and animal production systems [35,36]. This includes mushrooms [37,38], vegetables [39], row crops [40], cattle production [41], fisheries [42], and aquaculture like seaweed farming [43], among others. Traditional farming depends on the use of conventional agrochemicals, including fertilizers and pesticides, which have a lot of negative consequences for human and ecosystem health [44,45]. These traditional agro-practices contribute to problems including climate change, declining soil fertility, excessive reliance on chemical fertilizers and pesticides, and soil pollution [30]. Thus, there is a need to modify agriculture in a way that will avoid these problems. Nano-agriculture has shown promise for protecting soil and environmental health [46].
Reviews are crucial for keeping researchers and scientists up to date on pressing issues by providing information on and critiques of cutting-edge scientific breakthroughs. Therefore, this review discusses nano-food farming, focusing on selected sectors of nano-farming, including edible mushrooms, proteins, nano-agrochemicals (mainly nano-nutrients), and nanofibers. Nano-applications relevant to these sectors will be highlighted, along with their challenges and unknowns.

2. Toward Nano-Food Production

The Nano-Food Lab was established at Debrecen University in Hungary in 2008. The primary mission of this Lab is to investigate the use of nanotechnology in agricultural production and to commercialize the research results as new products. This strategy has produced many patents and publications in areas including nano-selenium, nano-tellurium, mushroom applications, nanofiber for biotechnology, and carbon-based nanomaterials (more details have been published by Sári et al. [34]). The nano-selenium production was biologically developed from dairy products. This technology was patented [47,48] and demonstrated as a commercial product that has been applied to applications such as nano-biofortification for human health [49], crop production under stress [50,51,52], and as a nano-bio fungicide agent [53]. The edible mushroom research has included mushroom farming systems and benefits [37], the role of mushroom as antimicrobial agents [54], the production of mushrooms for food and energy [55], nutritional and medicinal attributes of mushrooms [55], producing nanoparticles using mushrooms [56], and green biotechnology related to mushrooms [55]. Black foods, mainly banana and garlic, have received considerable attention at the Nano-Food Lab. Black foods can be found in both natural and processed forms, being present in our daily life for several years without being noticed. In addition, the chemistry underlying the black color of black foods has not yet been fully understood. More than 130 black foods are reported in the current review, which belong to 3 main groups and 12 sub-groups. In the studied black foods, melanins and anthocyanins are the primary pigments, along with other pigments such as chlorophylls, carotenoids, and tannins. The health potential of black foods is also discussed. Due to their high concentration of phytochemical and phenolic compounds, black-colored foods are beneficial in terms of preventing diseases and boosting the immune system. As a promising natural pigment and antioxidant compound source, black foods could be used as functional foods. Several questions on black foods are still open and need more investigation, especially the mechanisms by which the black color is formed in fruits and vegetables [57]. The biotechnological applications of nanofibers have been studied in our Lab and published about in relation to the agricultural sector [58] as well as the water and energy sectors [59]. The successful applications of nanofibers could be noticed in sectors such as producing clean water, sustainable energy, and safe food. The biotechnological applications of nanofibers may also include the production of fresh water and wastewater treatment, producing, converting, and storing energy, and different activities in the food sector. Furthermore, microbial applications of nanofibers in the biomedicine sector, and the most important biotechnological approaches, mainly plant tissue culture, are under processing for publication. Applying nanofibers in the field of plant tissue culture is a promising approach because these nanofibers can prevent any microbial contamination under in vitro conditions, but the loss of media by evaporation is the main challenge in this application. Last but not least, the microbial production of a selenium–tellurium nanoalloy for medicinal application was achieved by Muthu et al. [60]. The main guideline in all these previous works was to use sustainable, green, nano-biotechnology to produce safe and healthy foods. Different applications of nanotechnology in agri-food production are presented in Figure 1, as well as some suggested farming systems, challenges, and solutions focused on types of mushroom farming. To overcome the main problems facing these farming systems, integrated farming practices and sustainable management are needed.

3. Global Food Crisis and Sustainable Agriculture

Agriculture is a major source of raw materials, foods, fuels, fibers, and other ecosystem services that are important for human survival [62]. However, the growing global population represents a stress on the agriculture sector, along with increasingly difficult challenges, including protecting the environment and mitigating climate change [61]. The FAO reported that about 828 million people suffered from hunger globally in 2021 due to an inadequate and non-healthy diet [63]. Several practices have attempted to address food production needs through the use of chemically based pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, but these have documented negative effects on agricultural biodiversity and natural ecosystems [61]. Key facts regarding global farming are shown in Figure 2 and important food products and their mode of production according to [64,65] are shown in Figure 3. Global farming has been a driving force behind climate change due to greenhouse gas emissions from agri-food systems during the last twenty years, as shown in Figure 2. Over the same period, the agricultural land area decreased by 86 million ha globally.
Many crops were important global commodities in 2021, including sugar cane, maize, paddy rice, wheat, oil palm fruits, potato and other crops, with production (in million tons) of 1859; 1210; 787; 770; 416; 376; and 4069; respectively [65]. Global mineral fertilizer use reached 108, 46, and 40 million tons for N, P2O5, K2O fertilizers, respectively, in 2021 [56], with a trend of increasing fertilizer use over time [66]. The same trend of increasing use was also observed for the global application use of pesticides, which went from 2.178 to 3.535 million tons from 2000 to 2021 [56]. The harmful use of pesticides in agriculture over time has also led to the deterioration of both human health [44] and the broader environment, mainly non-target species in soil, air, and water [64]. Several efforts have been made to avoid these problems by moving toward the sustainable application of agrochemicals (pesticides), such as nano-formulation-based pesticides [67], green and microbial pesticides [68], and bio-pesticides [69]. The same trend exists for mineral fertilizers, where significant progress has been made toward sustainable fertilizer management through smart fertilizers [40], biogenic nano-fertilizers [29], nanocomposite-based smart fertilizers [70], and nano-biofertilizers [71].
Integrated farming practices are a critical tool for achieving sustainable farming and should be adopted. These practices may include no-tillage farming [72], crop rotations [73,74], and crop–livestock mixed systems [75], among others [76]. Sustainable farming cannot exist using only a single approach, as integrated and systematic technologies are needed to overcome the negative effects of single practices and avoid unhealthy and imbalanced effects on agro-ecosystems [61]. The new approaches are crucial for addressing the global food crisis through the application of proper nano- and/or bio-technologies along with integrated farming practices such as irrigation, fertilization, soil tillage, pre- and post-harvest, and pest management. The global food crisis has several dimensions, including economic [77], water security [78], global pandemics [79,80,81], and food loss and waste issues [82].

4. Nano-Food Farming: An Overview

The production of food utilizing nanotechnologies can be called nano-farming, and the applications are very diverse. The significant applications of nanotechnology in the food industry may involve three main groups: food security, food packaging, and food processing (Figure 4). Four crucial groups related to agri-food have been selected for detailed discussed in this review. The first group is edible mushrooms, the second group is protein-based nanoparticles, the third group is nano-nutrients, and the last group is nanofibers. The use of nanotechnology in agri-food production can be noticed in several sectors, such as nano-/biosensors for detecting pathogens [83], nano-management of agro-wastes [84,85], nano-enhancement of the shelf-life of agri-products [86], nano-identification and tracking of agri-foods [87], nano-agrochemicals for crop improvement [88], nanofibers for wastewater treatment [58,89], nano- or bio-remediation of soil and water [90], and nano-carriers to provide targeted delivery of treatments [91]. For example, the most common nanomaterial-based sensors include magnetic NPs, gold NPs, silica NPs, carbon nanotubes, peptide nanotubes, and quantum dots, which are used to detect different pathogens and their toxins [92].

5. Protein-Based Nanoparticles

5.1. Protein-Based Nitrogen Nanoparticles

In an era where the quest for sustainable agriculture has never been more urgent, nanotechnology is emerging as a promising tool for more efficient and sustainable practices [93,94]. Nanomaterials (NMs) have distinctive properties, including a high surface area, reactivity, agglomeration, and penetration capability, along with a small size and structures that are useful [95]. Nanomaterials are able to provide controlled release of agrochemicals and site-targeted delivery of various macromolecules. This improves plant growth through efficient nutrient utilization, development, and protection via plant disease resistance [95] and reduced environmental losses [96]. Nitrogen (N) is the most common limiting element in agricultural production [97]. However, the nitrogen use efficiency of crops is very low (30–40%) because of losses via surface runoff, leaching, ammonia (NH3) volatilization, N oxide (N2O, NO, NOx) emissions and long-term incorporation of mineral nitrogen into soil organic matter by soil microorganisms [74,98,99]. Therefore, NMs, with their unique properties, can regulate nitrogen transformations and reduce losses by adsorbing available nitrogen or changing the physical and chemical properties of the soil [74].
Among the N fertilizers, urea is a rich source of nitrogen and the most widely used globally [93]. Nano-N forms such as nano-hydroxyapatite, cellulose polymer nanocomposite [100], urea incorporated with cellulose-based hydrogel [101], and urea-doped nanofertilizer [93] have been used to reduce urea’s high solubility and slow the release of the mineral nitrogen. More details on these NMs and other combinations, along with their ability to slow N release and enhance plant N uptake, were discussed by Abhiram et al. [96]. In the case of organic farming, the chemical and physical methods of NP synthesis cannot be used. However, the valorization of waste products and their transformation into NPs could be a practical solution, along with the biological synthesis of NPs [102]. Chitosan NPs extracted from shrimp wastes are considered an eco-friendly nano-N source that increases the wheat grain yield and most of its components as well as nitrogen and potassium concentrations [103]. Similarly, the foliar application of nano-NPK produced from agro-wastes at a 25% concentration significantly promoted the growth, yield, and harvest of pepper compared to the control and chemical fertilizer-treated plants in a study by Abdel-Aziz et al. [104].
Organic farming is generally regarded as one prototype to enhance the sustainability of modern agriculture and decrease its environmental impacts. Cereal/legume intercropping is one strategy for eco-functional intensification in organic farming because the legumes in this system reduce the application of chemical N fertilizer and improve the uptake and fixation of nitrogen [105]. Abou El-Enin et al. [97] studied the ability of nano-chitosan-loaded nitrogen to enhance the utilization of mineral N applied to a maize–soybean intercropped system. Based on the gross productivity of maize (grains) and soybean (seeds), total revenue, and net profit, fertilizing maize plants with 216 kg nitrogen ha−1 (the intermediate N fertilizer treatment in the experiment) plus nano-chitosan-loaded N in an intercropped rotation was more beneficial than utilizing the intercropped or mono-cropped systems with mineral N fertilization only [97]. Additionally, the nano-chitosan-loaded nitrogen composite reduced the need for nitrogen fertilizer application by approximately 25% of the recommended rate, which lowered the possibility of environmental N pollution [97]. In another study, the intercropping of cowpea with maize and fertilizing with 75% of the recommended dose of mineral N along with 25% nano-urea increased the productivity of maize by 17.03 and 14.11%, and the total fresh forage of cowpea by 32.11 and 38.94%, compared with mineral fertilization in the first and second seasons, respectively [106]. Promising results were found regarding the effectiveness of nano-fertilizers, particularly nano-nitrogen, over conventional fertilizers in organic farming. In particular, the application of a combination of organic manure and nanofertilizers resulted in higher yields of wheat, sesame, pearl millet, and mustard by 5.35, 24.24, 4.2, and 8.4%, respectively, and better plant growth performances when compared to fields under conventional chemical fertilizer practice [107].
Despite nano-encapsulation being more efficient and being considered more environmentally friendly and safer compared with pesticides, there are concerns about the survival of microorganisms and the possible disruption of the legume–rhizobium symbiotic system under nano-applications [108]. There are examples of instances when the toxicity and bioaccumulation of nanoparticles led to setbacks [95], which makes toxicological studies necessary [104]. In addition, to expand the availability of nanoparticles, particularly N-NPs, in the agricultural market, future research should be designed to find more accessible and applicable manufacturing methods [97].
A promising role for protein-based nanoparticles (PBNs) in modern farming is the application of soybean PBNs as nano-carriers for the encapsulation of bioactive substances [109]. These bioactives can be transformed by many nano-forms, including nanoparticles, nano-gels, nano-fibers, and other nano-structured substances, where the encapsulated bioactives in PBNs can be stabilized in different environmental conditions, such as heat, light, and others [110]. Furthermore, the use of proteins as substrates for the preparation of nanoparticles as carriers of bioactive ingredients has received increased attention in the drug and food industries due to their stability, good water solubility, and bioaccessibility [111,112]. Along with applications of PBNs, which are needed to enhance the oral bioavailability from food protein NPs [113], the delivery of bioactive compounds using PBNs is a crucial issue [114,115]. Thus, the safety of PBNs and their biocompatibility as well as needed regulations were discussed in many studies focused on the rules of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for approved nano-formulations. These studies addressed topics such as designing biocompatible protein NPs [116], functional protein nanoparticles [117], application of protein NPs to encapsulate functional food [118], and protein-based NPs for therapeutic nucleic acid delivery [119]. More studies are needed on foods, focusing on alternative proteins, sustainable packaging, food architecture, and precision nutrition [120].

5.2. Alternative Protein Nanoparticles

The rapidly increasing global population, demand for food production, generation of food waste, and need to establish a sustainable environment have renewed interest in animal-protein substitutes such as plant, algal, fungal, and insect sources [121,122] and in the development of effective waste management strategies [123]. In addition to these practices, nanotechnology has emerged as a promising tool due to the unique properties of nanomaterials [124] and by offering opportunities to make food production more sustainable [125]. Nanotechnology provides better sensors, membranes, and sorbents, novel materials for timed and targeted delivery of agrochemicals, and new materials for monitoring and improving animal health [125].
Among the alternative proteins, plant-based protein is the most well-established category [122]. The NPs generated from plant-based proteins are preferred over carbohydrates and synthetic polymeric-based materials for food or medical applications [126]. In general, zein and gliadin are the predominant plant proteins used to develop nanoparticles due to their easy solubility in aqueous conditions [126]. Sustainable nanotechnology can be established by using biodegradable waste [127]. For example, in the rice milling industry, rice bran waste is an under-utilized sustainable resource that has been used to prepare nanoparticles with chitosan. These nanoparticles showed interesting properties by delaying degradability in gastric conditions in the small intestine with good biodegradability. When loaded with curcumin, an improvement in solubility and an increase in the entrapment efficiency were noted. Additionally, they exhibited higher cytotoxicity compared to free curcumin for Caco-2 cells, which has great potential for application in hydrophobic active agent delivery [128]. Like plant protein, edible insects are also sustainable sources of proteins [129]. Study of the potential of insect proteins to form nanoparticles (uncoated or coated with chitosan) and protect hydrophobic nutraceuticals (curcumin) revealed a moderate interaction resulting in a moderate encapsulation efficiency but an efficient release profile [129]. Coating the protein nanoparticles with chitosan protected the curcumin in the gastric phase, proving their promise as a delivery vehicle [129].
Animal proteins can also have interesting characteristics. For example, gelatine biopolymer nanoparticles have significant potential use in the food industry due to the numerous available active group sites for attaching target molecules [130]. However, these animal proteins can be associated with immunogenic responses [126] and may be rejected due to sociocultural (including religious) and health concerns [130]. Salah and his collaborators [131] characterized the protein nanoparticles extracted from chicken feathers, which were prepared by the reduction technique with plant extracts followed by ultrasonic treatment. The nanocomposite of these proteins showed great potential application in the future development of textile finishing due to its high loading efficiency and targeting effect. In another study, improvement of the mechanical properties of biobased mullet scale gelatin–carbon nanoparticles occurred upon the addition of the carbon nanoparticles, showing an increase in the elongation at break (clear plasticizing effect) and a decrease in the stiffness [132].

6. Nano-Farming of Mushrooms

6.1. Mushroom-Based Nanoparticles

The exploration of mushroom-derived nanoparticles has gained considerable attention in the field of nanotechnology in recent years, as seen in Table 1. This can be observed particularly through the utilization of some significant bioactive compounds, such as β-glucan polysaccharides [133], chitosan [134], and carbon nanodots produced through advanced technologies [135]. Moreover, there is a burgeoning interest in the capacity to synthesize gold and silver nanoparticles [136]. Edible mushrooms are an important source of human food. β-glucan, one of the most significant bioactive compounds present in mushrooms, is a relatively large molecule produced through intricate biochemical processes that entail specific enzymes, specifically β-glucan synthases, and involve structural components such as glucose molecules. These processes result in the formation of the distinctive beta-1,3 and beta-1,6 linkages that characterize β-glucans within the fungal cells [54,137]. Beta-glucans exhibit differences in their macromolecular structure, glycosidic linkage, and functional characteristics, depending on their respective sources [138]. These can be formed into nanoparticles with advantages like an increased surface area, improved bioavailability, biodegradability, enhanced mechanical properties, and reduced environmental impact [133]. Β-glucan nanoparticles from Lentinula edodes and Pleurotus ostreatus have demonstrated significant antitumor activity against colon and breast cancer cells. L. edodes has exhibited particularly high potential compared to P. ostreatus [139]. Chitosan has a high molecular weight and low immunogenicity. It is the product of the deacetylation of chitin that is present in the exoskeletons of crustaceans, insects, and fungal cell walls [140]. It is comprised of a blend of β-(1,4)-linked-D-glucosamine and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. Its primary repetitive unit is characterized by β-(1,4)-linked-D-glucosamine [141].
Numerous researchers were involved in transforming these macromolecules into nanoparticles to improve bioavailability, control substance release, augment surface area, optimize the utilization of functional properties (excellent physicochemical, antimicrobial attributes) and quantum size effect [150], and contribute to sustainable development [134,141,151]. Carbon nanodots (CNDs) are nanoscale carbon-based particles smaller than 10 nm. They have attracted considerable attention due to their fluorescence, antimicrobial properties [152], and easy preparation [153]. They can be synthesized from mushroom extracts through hydrothermal synthesis [152,154,155] by reacting with precursor substances in a high-temperature and high-pressure aqueous environment [135,156]. The production of synthesized silver (Ag-NPs) and gold (Au-NPs) nanoparticles by microorganisms is an emerging field of nanobiotechnology, which offers a cost-effective, rapid, and environmentally friendly green chemistry method [136]. Several edible mushrooms have been explored for their ability to reduce metal ions and facilitate the formation of stable metal nanoparticles [157,158]. Fungi like Agaricus [153,154], Ganoderma [155,156], Inonotus [157,158], Pleurotus [142,143], and Schizophyllum [144,145] species have been used in the biosynthesis of silver and gold nanoparticles. The process involves the use of fungal extracts or biomass to achieve the reduction of metal ions to their respective nanoparticles.

6.2. Nano-Applications in Food Packaging

Nanotechnology, with its ability to manipulate materials at the molecular and atomic levels, is poised to revolutionize various industries, including food packaging [159]. Packaging plays a pivotal role in ensuring food safety. It represents a crucial step in the food supply chain [160] and plays a role in establishing sustainable value within food chains while mitigating food waste [161]. Its primary objectives include preventing spoilage and contamination, enhancing sensitivity through the facilitation of enzyme activity, and minimizing weight loss [160]. Biodegradable functional films are materials crafted from ingredients that possess the unique characteristic of breaking down naturally over time, contributing to a reduction in the environmental impact. These materials are specifically designed for applications that prioritize sustainability, aiming to minimize the ecological footprint associated with conventional packaging [162,163,164]. Mushrooms, renowned for their diverse and valuable components, play a crucial role in shaping the landscape of biodegradable functional films. Various studies have explored the potential of several mushroom compounds for application in biodegradable functional films. These approaches show promise in contributing to the development of environmentally conscious packaging solutions [137,152,165].

7. Nano-Food Farming: Role of Nano-Nutrients

The production of food from cropping and livestock systems needs an adequate supply of nutrients in the proper ratios for healthy growth. These nutrients vary widely from essential to beneficial nutrients for plants and animals. The movement and uptake of applied nutrients by plants represents an important issue for crop production (Figure 5). The pathway of applied nutrients into the soil rhizosphere depends on many factors that involve the plant, soil, growth media, environmental, and agronomic factors. The method of nutrient application to crops can also influence the bioavailability of nutrients. The nutritional value of plant-based foods mainly reflects the mineral composition of these plants, which depends on the plant genetics, growing environment, and management practices [166]. The mineral composition of crops results from the uptake of nutrients from soil and/or foliar applications. The proper method of nutrient application depends in part on the type of fertilizer being applied, whether it is mineral [167], organic [168], a biofertilizer [169], nanofertilizer [170] or nano-biofertilizer [71]. Plant nutrition is also influenced by the environmental conditions around the plants, including abiotic and biotic stresses [171]. Nutritious plant-based foods are essential for human health [172]. Several publications have reported on human diseases related to plant-based diets, such as cardiovascular disease [173,174], chronic diseases [175], dementia and depression [176], systemic inflammation [177,178], chronic kidney disease [179], and general health outcomes [180].
In general, the chemical and biological pathways for Se-NPs synthesis are well-known, with priority over the biological methods via microbes or plant parts. The biological methods are more sustainable and have lower toxicity. For nano-farming, it is preferable to apply biological Se-NPs to support crop and animal production for food safety and to improve animal and human health, especially under stressful conditions [181,182]. Se-NPs have direct and indirect impacts on multiple aspects of the agroecosystem, including the soil, cultivated plants, and the food chain [183].
Figure 5. Mineral plant nutrients and their applications (part I), interactions in soil (part II), uptake (part III), movement in soil toward roots (part IV), and factors controlling uptake [166,184]. Plant image from https://www.cleanpng.com/png-biostimulant-fertilisers-agriculture-soil-foliar-f-5425521/, accessed on 6 January 2024.
Figure 5. Mineral plant nutrients and their applications (part I), interactions in soil (part II), uptake (part III), movement in soil toward roots (part IV), and factors controlling uptake [166,184]. Plant image from https://www.cleanpng.com/png-biostimulant-fertilisers-agriculture-soil-foliar-f-5425521/, accessed on 6 January 2024.
Agronomy 14 00606 g005
The application of nano-nutrients in nano-enabled agriculture has received intense research attention. However, the mechanism of uptake, movement of these nano-nutrients in the rhizosphere, and entry into plants, plant cells, and organelles are still insufficient. Many recent reports have discussed the delivery of nanoparticles (NPs) at different levels, including at the whole-plant and single-cell levels [185,186,187]. More details on this topic are presented in Figure 6. The differences between the uptake of traditional or mineral nutrients (Figure 5) and nano-nutrients (Figure 6) can be explained by the factors controlling their uptake and movement. In general, the 4Rs of nutrient management present the right strategy for the optimum use of applied nutrients, which includes applying the right nutrient at the right rate, right source, right time, and right place.

7.1. Nano-Selenium and Nano-Tellurium

Among the chalcogenide group, also known as the oxygen group, selenium (Se) and tellurium (Te) are similar elements that have many common proprieties (Figure 7). These include antimicrobial, antioxidative, antifungal, and anticancer properties, along with their ability to serve as drug delivery agents and to assist in bioremediation and bio-recovery. Alloys of Se and Te include similar crystal structures (hexagonal), electronegativity (5.88 and 5.50 eV), valences (+6), and atomic radii (117 and 137), respectively [188]. Both Se and Te are rare in the Earth’s crust, with abundances of about 0.05 and 0.001 mg kg−1, respectively. The high similarity in characteristics between these elements led to many similar applications for the bulk and nano-forms as well as their alloys, as reported by many studies [60,189,190,191].
Research has focused on the biological production of Se and Te nanoparticles [192,193,194] and the application of nano-Se for a variety of farming practices (Table 2). Applications of Te nanomaterials include electronics, opto-electronics, magnetoelectricity such as transistors, photodetectors, and sensors, and biomedicine [195]. Knowledge of the potential applications of nano-Te in farming is still in the very early stage. Research has been conducted on the myco-synthesis of tellurium nanoparticles [196] and production through Alteromonas sp. (a marine organism) under saline conditions [197]. The most promising application of biologically produced Te-NPs investigated to date has been based on the antimicrobial activity against pathogenic microorganisms [196], which may lead to meaningful applications in the farming and food systems. The highly efficient removal of pollutants like gallium from aqueous environments using biological nano-Te has been reported [198]. Biologically fabricated Te-NPs have been shown to have antioxidant, antibacterial, and cytotoxic applications [199]. Other studies have reported using yeast strains (Yarrowia lipolytica and Trichosporon cutaneum) to produce nano-Te [200].
Figure 7. A comparison of selenium and tellurium, including their nano-forms and biological production [188,189,195,201].
Figure 7. A comparison of selenium and tellurium, including their nano-forms and biological production [188,189,195,201].
Agronomy 14 00606 g007
Nano-Se has many crucial roles in farming practices, especially under biotic and abiotic stresses (Table 2). Under biotic stress that resulted from Xanthomonas albilineans infection, nano-Se supported the growth of sugarcane as an eco-fungicide and improved the juice quality [202]. The suggested mechanism of nano-Se for plant disease resistance involves enhancing the capacity of antioxidants, inducing the pathway of jasmonic acid, reducing the accumulation of ROS and H2O2, and promoting the pathways for phytohormones signaling [171,202,210]. Many studies have confirmed the role of nano-Se in inducing the resistance of crops to phytopathogens such as Botrytis cinerea in cucumber [211], spot blotch disease in wheat [212], Podosphaera xanthii in melon [210], Fusarium-induced wilt disease in lettuce [209], and Alternaria leaf spot disease in the common bean [53]. Along with the mitigation of stress, other benefits that have been reported due to nano-Se in farming include nano-biofortification [204,205], improving the quality and shelf life of harvested crops [213], and mitigation of abiotic stresses, including salinity [214], heavy metals [215], and drought [216]. The beneficial role of nano-Se in animal production has been confirmed by many studies under traditional and stressful conditions [217,218].

7.2. Carbon Nanodots

Carbon, along with hydrogen and oxygen, represents the origin of life as a main component of any organic matter. Carbon is an essential nutrient for all living organisms. Therefore, producing food and feed with farming practices depends on carbon. Nano-farming has received a great deal of attention due to its promising ability to support sustainable agriculture [52]. Carbon can be formed into a variety of nanomaterials, including graphene, fullerenes, carbon black, carbon nanofibers, carbon nano-horns, carbon nanotubes (e.g., multi-walled carbon nano-tubes, and single-walled carbon nano-tubes), quantum dots as carbon dots, and carbon nano-diamonds [219,220,221]. Carbon nanomaterials have exceptional optical, electrical, mechanical, and thermal properties. They are also inert, non-toxic, have a high level of biocompatibility, long-term chemical stability, and are eco-friendly [219,222,223,224]. Along with the biomedical applications of carbon nanodots, there is great interest in using carbon nanomaterials in the agriculture sector [225,226]. This ranges from enhancement of crop productivity [227,228,229] to genetic alteration and acute cytotoxicity [230], nano-seed priming [231], and nano-remediation of polluted soil [232].
Carbon nanodots (CNDs) are a versatile and promising class of nanomaterials with a wide range of potential applications. Recent studies have identified the presence of CNDs in various food products, including caramels, bread, jaggery, sugar caramel, cornflakes, and biscuits [233]. CNDs were also found in Coke (Figure 8A) and in soil used to grow mushrooms (Figure 8B). A model of CND formation is given in Figure 8C. CNDs have been found to interact with agricultural crops, influencing their growth, physiological functions, and production [234]. These interactions can lead to changes in the crop yield, metabolite production, and gene and protein expression [234]. The size and concentration of CNDs can significantly impact their effects on crops [234]. However, the potential risks of these interactions, such as the accumulation of CNDs in edible parts of crops and their potential impact on animal and human health, must be carefully evaluated [222]. The effects of CNDs vary depending on the nanomaterial type, concentration, and exposure time [235]. The unique properties of CNDs, such as low toxicity and high biocompatibility, make them promising for use in agriculture [236]. Some farming applications of CNDs are presented in Table 3. Further research is needed to understand these interaction mechanisms better and evaluate the potential benefits and risks of using CNDs in farming [237]. Therefore, while CNDs and other carbon-based nanomaterials have the potential to influence agricultural crops positively, further research is needed to fully understand their effects and potential risks.

8. Nano-Farming: Applied Nanofibers

Nanofibers are natural or synthetic polymeric fibers on a small (nano) scale that have certain properties (mainly a high surface-area-to-volume ratio, interconnected nano-porosity, and high mass transport properties). Natural nanofibers have animal, mineral, and plant sources. The properties of plant-based nanofibers depend on the plant fraction used to create them, such as leaves, stalks, seeds, and stems [59]. Nanofibers have been applied to several farming practices, including different growing stages [58] starting from seed germination [247], have been used to apply bioactives through nano-agrochemicals, including nanofertilizers [248] and nano-pesticides [249], and have been used post-harvest for the preservation of fruits and vegetables [250,251,252,253,254]. Nanofibers can also be used in the nano-remediation of polluted soil [255] and wastewater treatment [246,256] as well as in food safety, packaging and processing [257].
Several studies have investigated the use of nanofibers for farming and in the food sector (Table 4). The food sector investigations have included topics such as creating porous cellulose-acetate nanofiber hydrogels [258], starch-based nanofibers to monitor food freshness [259], poly-lactic acid nanofibers in food packaging [260], green nanofibers for the delivery of active foods [261], and natural cellulose nanofibers for fresh food packaging [257]. These nanofibers are good candidates for food packaging due to their biodegradability, ability to serve as exceptional barriers, and mechanical attributes [257]. These nanofibers can also reduce the food respiration rate and improve the rheological and antimicrobial properties, which extends the shelf life of food products [257].

9. Nano-Food Farming Challenges

Due to their effective and sustainable applications, nanomaterials (NMs) have emerged as a key empowering technology for agro-production. The advantages may include their higher target rate and delivery efficiency, less coagulation/aggregation, and higher stability at reaction sites [268]. Several studies have reported on nano-enabled agriculture and have focused on issues such as nano-enabled precision farming [17], nano-enabled farming [12,268], the nano-food industry [269], nano-enabled seed treatments [19,270], nano-structured manganese oxides [271], nano-enabled agrochemicals [88,170,272], and nano-Zn-enabled cropping systems [16]. Along with nano-enabled farming, nano-processed food products have shown great promise for a variety of applications in the food industry [269,273,274] using organic compounds such as chitosan [275], cellulose [276], and proteins [277]. Inorganic nanoparticles have also been used in the food industry, including nano-selenium [278], nano-silver [279], nano-iron [280], nano-zinc oxide [281], and nano-titanium oxide [282]. The main challenges facing farming include climate change and global warming, soil fertility loss, water scarcity, energy security, biodiversity loss, and environmental deterioration (Figure 1). The suggested solutions include the integration of farming practices, more applied farming system design and innovation, farming system development and assessment, and sustainable farming management (Figure 9). For example, an integrated nanocomposite that used protein-based nitrogen-doped CDs/TiO2-NPs was successfully utilized for the photocatalytic degradation of pollutants like Cr VI [283]. More studies on the integration between mushrooms, CDs, nanofibers, and nano-nutrients are needed. The most important issue displayed in Figure 9 is the suggested integration among the four studied sectors (proteins, mushrooms, nano-nutrients, and nanofibers). Creating an integrated farming system is an important target that can be achieved utilizing these types of suggestions. This should be the subject of additional investigations in the future. For example, how can we maximize the benefits among these previously mentioned four sectors? Could we produce CNDs from mushroom mycelium, nanofibers enriched with nano-Se for therapeutic purposes, etc.?
The nano-farming journey is not yet finished but will continue into the future with enormous challenges left to overcome. These challenges are not only at the local, national, and global levels but also represent challenges translating discoveries from the lab to the field. Many of these challenges are summarized with the following questions:
-
What are the main risks and benefits of nano-enabled agriculture?
-
What are the full life-cycle studies of the nanomaterials utilized in agriculture?
-
How do we effectively move our research from the laboratory to the field level?
-
To what extent does the field scale remain a critical knowledge gap?
-
To what extent is nano-enabled agriculture an emerging global issue for crop production?
-
What are the knowledge gaps that should be addressed concerning nano-safety?
-
To what extent can nanotechnology create safe and efficient delivery systems for food?
-
What are the required regulations, biosecurity measures, and public concern issues related to manufacturing, packing, and consuming nano-based food?

10. Conclusions and Further Perspectives

In concert with the increasing global population, we need to produce more food to feed all people worldwide. At the same time, agriculture faces several obstacles that may cause a significant decline in global food production and delivery. Nano-farming offers promising solutions that could make significant progress toward increasing global food production while also increasing food quality and reducing food waste. This review of nano-farming focused on four sectors: proteins, mushrooms, nano-nutrients, and nanofibers. These sectors offer much opportunity to the agricultural industry. Each sector has the ability to supply the agricultural and food industries with essential requirements for human health. Protein-based NPs have promising applications in the food, therapeutic, and pharmaceutical industries. Due to their good water solubility, bioaccessibility, and stability, the nano-application of proteins has received increased attention in relation to their use as carriers of bioactive ingredients for food and drugs. Many nano-applications have been documented for edible mushrooms, including producing nanoparticles and bioactives within mushroom-based nano-applications. Selenium and tellurium nano-nutrients and CNDs offer several opportunities in the field of agri-food production beyond the obvious application of nano-nutrients in crop production. Nanofibers have incredible possible applications in irrigation and the food industry. It is important to note that there are still many unknowns regarding nano-farming and there are many challenges that need to be investigated so we can strike a balance between sustainable production and protecting the agro-environment from potential nanotoxicity. Studies on nano-farming need to move from the lab into the field and factory to address many of these challenges.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.E.-R. and J.P.; methodology, D.S.; software, A.M.; validation, G.T., D.H.H.N. and E.C.B.; formal analysis, A.M. and E.C.B.; investigation, C.N.; resources, D.S., A.F. and J.P.; data curation, H.E.-R. and J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, G.T., C.N., D.H.H.N. and H.E.-R.; writing—review and editing G.T., C.N., D.H.H.N., H.E.-R. and E.C.B.; visualization, H.E.-R.; supervision, J.P.; project administration, J.P.; funding acquisition, J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors are thankful for the financial support of the 2020-1.1.2-PIACI-KFI-2020-00100 Project “Development of innovative food raw materials based on Maillard reaction by functional transformation of traditional and exotic mushrooms for food and medicinal purposes”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

J.D.: Project no. TKP2021-EGA-20 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-EGA funding scheme.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ebenso, B.; Otu, A.; Giusti, A.; Cousin, P.; Adetimirin, V.; Razafindralambo, H.; Effa, E.; Gkisakis, V.; Thiare, O.; Levavasseur, V.; et al. Nature-Based One Health Approaches to Urban Agriculture Can Deliver Food and Nutrition Security. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 773746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. van Dijk, M.; Morley, T.; Rau, M.L.; Saghai, Y. A Meta-Analysis of Projected Global Food Demand and Population at Risk of Hunger for the Period 2010–2050. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 494–501. Available online: https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-021-00322-9 (accessed on 20 January 2024). [CrossRef]
  3. Spormann, S.; Nadais, P.; Sousa, F.; Pinto, M.; Martins, M.; Sousa, B.; Fidalgo, F.; Soares, C. Accumulation of Proline in Plants under Contaminated Soils—Are We on the Same Page? Antioxidants 2023, 12, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brevik, E.C. Agricultural Land Degradation in the United States of America. In Impact of Agriculture on Soil Degradation I; Pereira, P., Muñoz-Rojas, M., Bogunovic, I., Zhao, W., Eds.; The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 120, pp. 363–391. ISBN 978-3-031-32167-2. [Google Scholar]
  5. Avcı, B.C.; Kesgin, E.; Atam, M.; Tan, R.I.; Abdelkader, M. Short-Term Climate Change Influence on Surface Water Quality Impacts from Agricultural Activities. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 89581–89596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Daszkiewicz, T. Food Production in the Context of Global Developmental Challenges. Agriculture 2022, 12, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haase, P.; Bowler, D.E.; Baker, N.J.; Bonada, N.; Domisch, S.; Garcia Marquez, J.R.; Heino, J.; Hering, D.; Jähnig, S.C.; Schmidt-Kloiber, A. The Recovery of European Freshwater Biodiversity Has Come to a Halt. Nature 2023, 620, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Brevik, E.C. Soil, Food Security, and Human Health. In Soils, Plant Growth and Crop Production; Verheye, W.H., Ed.; EOLSS Publishers: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2010; Volume III, pp. 161–195. ISBN 978-1-84826-879-7. [Google Scholar]
  9. Prasad, R.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Nguyen, Q.D. Nanotechnology in Sustainable Agriculture: Recent Developments, Challenges, and Perspectives. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hafeez, A.; Ali, B.; Javed, M.A.; Saleem, A.; Fatima, M.; Fathi, A.; Afridi, M.S.; Aydin, V.; Oral, M.A.; Soudy, F.A. Plant Breeding for Harmony between Sustainable Agriculture, the Environment, and Global Food Security: An Era of Genomics-assisted Breeding. Planta 2023, 258, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Aman Mohammadi, M.; Maximiano, M.R.; Hosseini, S.M.; Franco, O.L. CRISPR-Cas Engineering in Food Science and Sustainable Agriculture: Recent Advancements and Applications. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2023, 46, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Goyal, V.; Rani, D.; Ritika; Mehrotra, S.; Deng, C.; Wang, Y. Unlocking the Potential of Nano-Enabled Precision Agriculture for Efficient and Sustainable Farming. Plants 2023, 12, 3744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Karnwal, A.; Dohroo, A.; Malik, T. Unveiling the Potential of Bioinoculants and Nanoparticles in Sustainable Agriculture for Enhanced Plant Growth and Food Security. BioMed Res. Int. 2023, 2023, 6911851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Haris, M.; Hussain, T.; Mohamed, H.I.; Khan, A.; Ansari, M.S.; Tauseef, A.; Khan, A.A.; Akhtar, N. Nanotechnology—A New Frontier of Nano-Farming in Agricultural and Food Production and Its Development. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 857, 159639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sarker, P.K.; Paul, A.S.; Karmoker, D. Mitigating Climate Change and Pandemic Impacts on Global Food Security: Dual Sustainable Agriculture Approach (2S Approach). Planta 2023, 258, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. García, P.; Tabla, R.; Anany, H.; Bastias, R.; Brøndsted, L.; Casado, S.; Cifuentes, P.; Deaton, J.; Denes, T.G.; Islam, M.A. ECOPHAGE: Combating Antimicrobial Resistance Using Bacteriophages for Eco-Sustainable Agriculture and Food Systems; MDPI: Basel, Switzerland, 2023; ISBN 1999-4915. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zain, M.; Ma, H.; Chaudhary, S.; Nuruzaman, M.; Azeem, I.; Mehmood, F.; Rahman, S.U.; Aiwang, D.; Sun, C. Nanotechnology in Precision Agriculture: Advancing towards Sustainable Crop Production. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 206, 108244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, A.; Rajput, V.D.; Pandey, D.; Sharma, R.; Ghazaryan, K.; Minkina, T. Nano Zinc-Enabled Strategies in Crops for Combatting Zinc Malnutrition in Human Health. Front. Biosci.-Landmark 2023, 28, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhao, L.; Zhou, X.; Kang, Z.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Zhu, Y.-G. Nano-Enabled Seed Treatment: A New and Sustainable Approach to Engineering Climate-Resilient Crops. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 910, 168640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Daniel, A.I.; Keyster, M.; Klein, A. Biogenic Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles: A Viable Agricultural Tool to Control Plant Pathogenic Fungi and Its Potential Effects on Soil and Plants. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 897, 165483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kumari, R.; Suman, K.; Karmakar, S.; Lakra, S.G.; Saurav, G.K.; Mahto, B.K. Regulation and Safety Measures for Nanotechnology-Based Agri-Products. Front. Genome Ed. 2023, 5, 1200987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Miguel-Rojas, C.; Pérez-de-Luque, A. Nanobiosensors and Nanoformulations in Agriculture: New Advances and Challenges for Sustainable Agriculture. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 2023, 7, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. An, C.; Sun, C.; Li, N.; Huang, B.; Jiang, J.; Shen, Y.; Wang, C.; Zhao, X.; Cui, B.; Wang, C. Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology for the Delivery of Agrochemicals: Strategies towards Sustainable Agriculture. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gangwar, J.; Kadanthottu Sebastian, J.; Puthukulangara Jaison, J.; Kurian, J.T. Nano-Technological Interventions in Crop Production—A Review. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2023, 29, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kumar, V.; Arora, K. Trends in Nano-Inspired Biosensors for Plants. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 2020, 3, 255–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rahmani, M.K.I.; Ghanimi, H.M.A.; Jilani, S.F.; Aslam, M.; Alharbi, M.; Alroobaea, R.; Sengan, S. Early Pathogen Prediction in Crops Using Nano Biosensors and Neural Network-Based Feature Extraction and Classification. Big Data Res. 2023, 34, 100412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ijaz, M.; Khan, F.; Ahmed, T.; Noman, M.; Zulfiqar, F.; Rizwan, M.; Chen, J.; Siddique, K.H.; Li, B. Nanobiotechnology to Advance Stress Resilience in Plants: Current Opportunities and Challenges. Mater. Today Bio 2023, 22, 100759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. El-Bialy, S.M.; El-Mahrouk, M.E.; Elesawy, T.; Omara, A.E.-D.; Elbehiry, F.; El-Ramady, H.; Áron, B.; Prokisch, J.; Brevik, E.C.; Solberg, S.Ø. Biological Nanofertilizers to Enhance Growth Potential of Strawberry Seedlings by Boosting Photosynthetic Pigments, Plant Enzymatic Antioxidants, and Nutritional Status. Plants 2023, 12, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jha, A.; Pathania, D.; Damathia, B.; Raizada, P.; Rustagi, S.; Singh, P.; Rani, G.M.; Chaudhary, V. Panorama of Biogenic Nano-Fertilizers: A Road to Sustainable Agriculture. Environ. Res. 2023, 235, 116456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sekhon, B.S. Nanotechnology in Agri-Food Production: An Overview. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2014, 7, 31–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mohammad, Z.H.; Ahmad, F.; Ibrahim, S.A.; Zaidi, S. Application of Nanotechnology in Different Aspects of the Food Industry. Discov. Food 2022, 2, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mohammadi, S.; Jabbari, F.; Cidonio, G.; Babaeipour, V. Revolutionizing Agriculture: Harnessing Nano-Innovations for Sustainable Farming and Environmental Preservation. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2024, 198, 105722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Singh, A.; Rajput, V.D.; Varshney, A.; Sharma, R.; Ghazaryan, K.; Minkina, T.; Alexiou, A.; El-Ramady, H. Revolutionizing Crop Production: Nanoscale Wonders—Current Applications, Advances, and Future Frontiers. Egypt. J. Soil Sci. 2024, 64, 221–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sári, D.; Ferroudj, A.; Muthu, A.; Prokisch, J.; El-Ramady, H.; Elsakhawy, T.A.; Omara, A.E.-D.; Brevik, E. Nano-Enabled Agriculture Using Nano-Selenium for Crop Productivity: What Should Be Addressed More? Environ. Biodivers. Soil Secur. 2023, 7, 85–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pretto, A.; Savio, G.; Gottardo, F.; Uccheddu, F.; Concheri, G. A Novel Low-Cost Visual Ear Tag Based Identification System for Precision Beef Cattle Livestock Farming. Inf. Process. Agric. 2022, 11, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhao, K.; Shen, X.; Zhou, P.; Wu, J. Effects of Nano-Cu2O on the Productivity in the Cu-Stripped Chinese Merino Sheep. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 1181–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Llanaj, X.; Törős, G.; Hajdu, P.; El-Ramady, H.; Peles, F.; Prokisch, J. Mushroom Cultivation Systems: Exploring Antimicrobial and Prebiotic Benefits. Environ. Biodivers. Soil Secur. 2023, 7, 101–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zou, G.; Nielsen, J.B.; Wei, Y. Harnessing Synthetic Biology for Mushroom Farming. Trends Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 480–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Abdalla, Z.; El-Ramady, H.; Omara, A.E.-D.; Elsakhawy, T.; Bayoumi, Y.; Shalaby, T.; Prokisch, J. From Farm-to-Fork: A Pictorial Mini Review on Nano-Farming of Vegetables. Environ. Biodivers. Soil Secur. 2022, 6, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Divya, S.; Rusyn, I.; Solorza-Feria, O.; Sathish-Kumar, K. Sustainable SMART Fertilizers in Agriculture Systems: A Review on Fundamentals to in-Field Applications. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 904, 166729. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hamid, L.; Alsayari, A.; Tak, H.; Mir, S.A.; Almoyad, M.A.A.; Wahab, S.; Bader, G.N. An Insight into the Global Problem of Gastrointestinal Helminth Infections amongst Livestock: Does Nanotechnology Provide an Alternative? Agriculture 2023, 13, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ahmed, J.; Vasagam, K.K.; Ramalingam, K. Nanoencapsulated Aquafeeds and Current Uses in Fisheries/Shrimps: A Review. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2023, 195, 7110–7131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Khan, M.I.R.; Nazir, F.; Maheshwari, C.; Chopra, P.; Chhillar, H.; Sreenivasulu, N. Mineral Nutrients in Plants under Changing Environments: A Road to Future Food and Nutrition Security. Plant Genome 2023, 16, e20362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Brevik, E.C.; Slaughter, L.; Singh, B.R.; Steffan, J.J.; Collier, D.; Barnhart, P.; Pereira, P. Soil and Human Health: Current Status and Future Needs. Air Soil Water Res. 2020, 13, 117862212093444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bhaskar, M.; Kumar, A.; Rani, R. Application of Nano Formulations in Agriculture. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2023, 54, 102934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sharma, R.; Kumar, V. Nano Enabled Agriculture for Sustainable Soil. Waste Manag. Bull. 2024, 2, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Prokisch, J.; Széles, É.; Kovács, B.; Daróczy, L.; Zommara, M. Formation of Metal Selenium Nanospheres in Bacteria: Is It a Possible Detoxification Mechanism? Cereal Res. Commun. 2008, 36, 947–950. [Google Scholar]
  48. Prokisch, J.; Zommara, M.A. Process for Producing Elemental Selenium Nanospheres. U.S. Patent No. 8,003,071, 23 August 2011. [Google Scholar]
  49. El-Ramady, H.; Faizy, S.E.-D.; Abdalla, N.; Taha, H.; Domokos-Szabolcsy, É.; Fari, M.; Elsakhawy, T.; Omara, A.E.-D.; Shalaby, T.; Bayoumi, Y. Selenium and Nano-Selenium Biofortification for Human Health: Opportunities and Challenges. Soil Syst. 2020, 4, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. El-Ramady, H.; Taha, N.; Shalaby, T.; Elsakhawy, T.A.; Omara, A.E.-D.; Prokisch, J.; Bayoumi, Y. Nano-Selenium and Its Interaction with Other Nano-Nutrients in Soil under Stressful Plants: A Mini-Review. Environ. Biodivers. Soil Secur. 2021, 5, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Saffan, M.M.; Koriem, M.A.; El-Henawy, A.; El-Mahdy, S.; El-Ramady, H.; Elbehiry, F.; Omara, A.E.-D.; Bayoumi, Y.; Badgar, K.; Prokisch, J. Sustainable Production of Tomato Plants (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) under Low-Quality Irrigation Water as Affected by Bio-Nanofertilizers of Selenium and Copper. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. El-Ramady, H.; Shedeed, S.; Abdalla, Z.F.; El-Bassiony, A.E.-M.; El-Sawy, S.; Mahmoud, S.; Prokisch, J. Biofortification of Vegetables under Stress Conditions Using Biological Nano-Selenium: A Mini-Review. Environ. Biodivers. Soil Secur. 2023, 7, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Taha, N.A.; Hamden, S.; Bayoumi, Y.A.; Elsakhawy, T.; El-Ramady, H.; Solberg, S.Ø. Nanofungicides with Selenium and Silicon Can Boost the Growth and Yield of Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) and Control Alternaria Leaf Spot Disease. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Törős, G.; El-Ramady, H.; Prokisch, J.; Velasco, F.; Llanaj, X.; Nguyen, D.H.; Peles, F. Modulation of the Gut Microbiota with Prebiotics and Antimicrobial Agents from Pleurotus Ostreatus Mushroom. Foods 2023, 12, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. El-Ramady, H.; Abdalla, N.; Badgar, K.; Llanaj, X.; Törős, G.; Hajdú, P.; Eid, Y.; Prokisch, J. Edible Mushrooms for Sustainable and Healthy Human Food: Nutritional and Medicinal Attributes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Elsakhawy, T.; Omara, A.E.-D.; Abowaly, M.; El-Ramady, H.; Badgar, K.; Llanaj, X.; Törős, G.; Hajdú, P.; Prokisch, J. Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles by Mushrooms: A Crucial Dimension for Sustainable Soil Management. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nguyen, D.H.; El-Ramady, H.; Llanaj, X.; Törős, G.; Hajdú, P.; Prokisch, J. Chemical Composition and Health Attributes of Agri-Foods: A Scientific Overview on Black Foods. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Badgar, K.; Abdalla, N.; El-Ramady, H.; Prokisch, J. Sustainable Applications of Nanofibers in Agriculture and Water Treatment: A Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Prokisch, J.; Sári, D.; Muthu, A.; Nagy, A.; El-Ramady, H.; Abdalla, N.; Dobránszki, J. Biotechnology of Nanofiber in Water, Energy, and Food Sectors. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Muthu, A.; Sári, D.; Ferroudj, A.; El-Ramady, H.; Béni, Á.; Badgar, K.; Prokisch, J. Microbial-Based Biotechnology: Production and Evaluation of Selenium-Tellurium Nanoalloys. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhang, H.-L.; Dang, Y.P.; Li, L. Farming System: A Systemic Solution to Sustainable Agricultural Development. Farming Syst. 2023, 1, 100007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Brevik, E.C.; Pereg, L.; Pereira, P.; Steffan, J.J.; Burgess, L.C.; Gedeon, C.I. Shelter, Clothing, and Fuel: Often Overlooked Links between Soils, Ecosystem Services, and Human Health. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. FAO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022: Repurposing Food and Agricultural Policies to Make Healthy Diets More Affordable; Food & Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2022; Volume 2022, ISBN 92-5-136499-0. [Google Scholar]
  64. Dehghani, M.H.; Ahmadi, S.; Ghosh, S.; Khan, M.S.; Othmani, A.; Khanday, W.A.; Gökkuş, Ö.; Osagie, C.; Ahmaruzzaman, M.; Mishra, S.R. Sustainable Remediation Technologies for Removal of Pesticides as Organic Micro-Pollutants from Water Environments: A Review. Appl. Surf. Sci. Adv. 2024, 19, 100558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. FAO Statistical Yearbook—World Food and Agriculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2023. [CrossRef]
  66. Adalibieke, W.; Cui, X.; Cai, H.; You, L.; Zhou, F. Global Crop-Specific Nitrogen Fertilization Dataset in 1961–2020. Sci. Data 2023, 10, 617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ale, A.; Andrade, V.S.; Gutierrez, M.F.; Bacchetta, C.; Rossi, A.S.; Orihuela, P.S.; Desimone, M.F.; Cazenave, J. Nanotechnology-Based Pesticides: Environmental Fate and Ecotoxicity. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2023, 471, 116560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lin, F.; Mao, Y.; Zhao, F.; Idris, A.L.; Liu, Q.; Zou, S.; Guan, X.; Huang, T. Towards Sustainable Green Adjuvants for Microbial Pesticides: Recent Progress, Upcoming Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Daraban, G.M.; Hlihor, R.-M.; Suteu, D. Pesticides vs. Biopesticides: From Pest Management to Toxicity and Impacts on the Environment and Human Health. Toxics 2023, 11, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Chakraborty, R.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Paul, S.; Sarkar, S.; Mukhopadhyay, R. Nanocomposite-Based Smart Fertilizers: A Boon to Agricultural and Environmental Sustainability. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 863, 160859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Sharma, B.; Tiwari, S.; Kumawat, K.C.; Cardinale, M. Nano-Biofertilizers as Bio-Emerging Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture Development: Potentiality and Their Limitations. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 860, 160476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, P.; Ying, D.; Li, J.; Deng, J.; Li, C.; Tian, S.; Zhao, G.; Wu, C.; Jiao, J.; Jiang, M.; et al. Global-Scale No-Tillage Impacts on Soil Aggregates and Associated Carbon and Nitrogen Concentrations in Croplands: A Meta-Analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 881, 163570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ghani, M.I.; Ali, A.; Atif, M.J.; Ali, M.; Ahanger, M.A.; Chen, X.; Cheng, Z. Different Leafy Vegetable Cropping Systems Regulate Growth, Photosynthesis, and PSII Functioning in Mono-Cropped Eggplant by Altering Chemical Properties and Upregulating the Antioxidant System. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1132861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, B.; Liu, J.; Liu, Q.; Sun, J.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, J.; Gao, W.; Chen, Y.; Sui, P. Knowledge Domain and Research Progress in the Field of Crop Rotation from 2000 to 2020: A Scientometric Review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 30, 86598–86617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ghahramani, A.; Kingwell, R.S.; Maraseni, T.N. Land Use Change in Australian Mixed Crop-Livestock Systems as a Transformative Climate Change Adaptation. Agric. Syst. 2020, 180, 102791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Bhati, P.; Saikia, A.R.; Chaudhary, S.; Bahadur, R.; Nengparmoi, T.; Talukdar, N. Sanjay Hazarika Integrated Farming Systems for Environment Sustainability: A Comprehensive Review. J. Sci. Res. Rep. 2024, 30, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sooriyaarachchi, P.; Jayawardena, R. Impact of the Economic Crisis on Food Consumption of Sri Lankans: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2023, 17, 102786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Schwartz, S.A. The Growing Crisis of Food and Water Insecurity, and Homelessness, Afflicting the United States; Elsevier Science Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Volume 19, pp. 167–169. ISBN 1550-8307. [Google Scholar]
  79. Nakat, Z.; Tayoun, V.; Merhi, S.; Bou-Mitri, C.; Karam, L. Food Safety Culture in Food Companies amid the Lebanese Economic Crisis and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Heliyon 2023, 9, e19885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Roubík, H.; Lošťák, M.; Ketuama, C.T.; Soukupová, J.; Procházka, P.; Hruška, A.; Hakl, J.; Pacek, L.; Karlík, P.; Menšíková, L.K. COVID-19 Crisis Interlinkage with Past Pandemics and Their Effects on Food Security. Glob. Health 2023, 19, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Gorzycka-Sikora, A.; Mock, N.; Lacey, M. Multivariate Analysis of Food Consumption Profiles in Crisis Settings. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0283627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kim, H.; Park, J. Quantification of Food Loss and Waste and Its Percentage Estimation along the Food Supply Chain in Korea. Waste Manag. Res. 2023, 41, 1529–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Valenzuela-Amaro, H.M.; Aguayo-Acosta, A.; Meléndez-Sánchez, E.R.; de la Rosa, O.; Vázquez-Ortega, P.G.; Oyervides-Muñoz, M.A.; Sosa-Hernández, J.E.; Parra-Saldívar, R. Emerging Applications of Nanobiosensors in Pathogen Detection in Water and Food. Biosensors 2023, 13, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. El-Ramady, H.; El-Henawy, A.; Amer, M.; Omara, A.E.-D.; Elsakhawy, T.; Elbasiouny, H.; Elbehiry, F.; Abou Elyazid, D.; El-Mahrouk, M. Agricultural Waste and Its Nano-Management: Mini Review. Egypt. J. Soil Sci. 2020, 60, 349–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kumar, R.S.; Sasikumar, R.; Dhilipkumar, T. Exploiting Agro-Waste for Cleaner Production: A Review Focusing on Biofuel Generation, Bio-Composite Production, and Environmental Considerations. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 435, 140536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sharma, A.; Hazarika, M.; Heisnam, P.; Pandey, H.; Devadas, V.S.; Singh, D.; Wangsu, M.; Kartha, B.D. Influence of Storage Conditions, Packaging, Post-Harvest Technology, Nanotechnology and Molecular Approaches on Shelf Life of Microgreens. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yadav, A.; Yadav, K.; Ahmad, R.; Abd-Elsalam, K.A. Emerging Frontiers in Nanotechnology for Precision Agriculture: Advancements, Hurdles and Prospects. Agrochemicals 2023, 2, 220–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ahmed, T.; Noman, M.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; White, J.C.; Li, B. Dynamic Interplay between Nano-Enabled Agrochemicals and the Plant-Associated Microbiome. Trends Plant Sci. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Zamel, D.; Khan, A.U.; Waris, A.; Ebrahim, A.; Abd El-Sattar, N.E. Nanomaterials Advancements for Enhanced Contaminant Removal in Wastewater Treatment: Nanoparticles, Nanofibers, and Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs). Results Chem. 2023, 6, 101092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Chauhan, P.; Imam, A.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Suman, S.K. Nano-Bioremediation: An Eco-Friendly and Effective Step towards Petroleum Hydrocarbon Removal from Environment. Environ. Res. 2023, 231, 116224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Li, M.; Guo, Q.; Zhong, C.; Zhang, Z. Multifunctional Cell Membranes-Based Nano-Carriers for Targeted Therapies: A Review of Recent Trends and Future Perspective. Drug Deliv. 2023, 30, 2288797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Abedi-Firoozjah, R.; Ebdali, H.; Soltani, M.; Abdolahi-Fard, P.; Heydari, M.; Assadpour, E.; Azizi-Lalabadi, M.; Zhang, F.; Jafari, S.M. Nanomaterial-Based Sensors for the Detection of Pathogens and Microbial Toxins in the Food Industry; a Review on Recent Progress. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2024, 500, 215545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Ramírez-Rodríguez, G.B.; Miguel-Rojas, C.; Montanha, G.S.; Carmona, F.J.; Dal Sasso, G.; Sillero, J.C.; Skov Pedersen, J.; Masciocchi, N.; Guagliardi, A.; Pérez-de-Luque, A. Reducing Nitrogen Dosage in Triticum Durum Plants with Urea-Doped Nanofertilizers. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Mannino, G. A New Era of Sustainability: Plant Biostimulants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Agrahari, S.; Dubey, A. Nanoparticles in Plant Growth and Development. In Biogenic Nano-Particles and Their Use in Agro-Ecosystems; Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore, 2020; pp. 9–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Abhiram, G. Contributions of Nano-Nitrogen Fertilizers to Sustainable Development Goals: A Comprehensive Review. Nitrogen 2023, 4, 397–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Abou El-Enin, M.M.; Sheha, A.M.; El-Serafy, R.S.; Ali, O.A.; Saudy, H.S.; Shaaban, A. Foliage-Sprayed Nano-Chitosan-Loaded Nitrogen Boosts Yield Potentials, Competitive Ability, and Profitability of Intercropped Maize-Soybean. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2023, 17, 517–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Mejias, J.H.; Salazar, F.; Pérez Amaro, L.; Hube, S.; Rodriguez, M.; Alfaro, M. Nanofertilizers: A Cutting-Edge Approach to Increase Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Grasslands. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yan, X.; Xia, L.; Ti, C. Temporal and Spatial Variations in Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Crop Production in China. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 293, 118496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rop, K.; Mbui, D.; Karuku, G.N.; Michira, I.; Njomo, N. Characterization of Water Hyacinth Cellulose-g-Poly (Ammonium Acrylate-Co-Acrylic Acid)/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Polymer Hydrogel Composite for Potential Agricultural Application. Results Chem. 2020, 2, 100020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, Y.; Shaghaleh, H.; Hamoud, Y.A.; Zhang, S.; Li, P.; Xu, X.; Liu, H. Synthesis of a pH-Responsive Nano-Cellulose/Sodium Alginate/MOFs Hydrogel and Its Application in the Regulation of Water and N-Fertilizer. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 187, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Meena, K.; Meena, N.D.; Meena, R.N.; Choudhary, M.; Meena, S.; Kumar, S. Role of Nanotechnology in Organic Agriculture. In Advances in Resting-State Functional MRI; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2023; pp. 343–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Saad, A.M.; Alabdali, A.Y.M.; Ebaid, M.; Salama, E.; El-Saadony, M.T.; Selim, S.; Safhi, F.A.; ALshamrani, S.M.; Abdalla, H.; Mahdi, A.H. Impact of Green Chitosan Nanoparticles Fabricated from Shrimp Processing Waste as a Source of Nano Nitrogen Fertilizers on the Yield Quantity and Quality of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Cultivars. Molecules 2022, 27, 5640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Abdel-Aziz, H.M.; Soliman, M.I.; Abo Al-Saoud, A.M.; El-Sherbeny, G.A. Waste-Derived NPK Nanofertilizer Enhances Growth and Productivity of Capsicum Annuum L. Plants 2021, 10, 1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Lai, H.; Gao, F.; Su, H.; Zheng, P.; Li, Y.; Yao, H. Nitrogen Distribution and Soil Microbial Community Characteristics in a Legume–Cereal Intercropping System: A Review. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. El-Ghobashy, Y.E.; Elmehy, A.A.; El-Douby, K.A. Influence of Intercropping Cowpea with Some Maize Hybrids and N Nano-Mineral Fertilization on Productivity in Salinity Soil. Egypt. J. Agron. 2020, 42, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kumar, A.; Singh, K.; Verma, P.; Singh, O.; Panwar, A.; Singh, T.; Kumar, Y.; Raliya, R. Effect of Nitrogen and Zinc Nanofertilizer with the Organic Farming Practices on Cereal and Oil Seed Crops. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Wang, Q.; Gao, L.; Li, Y.; Shakoor, N.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, G.; Wang, F.; Shen, Y.; Rui, Y. Nano-Agriculture and Nitrogen Cycling: Opportunities and Challenges for Sustainable Farming. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 421, 138489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Gong, H.; Fu, H.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Cai, L.; Chen, J.; Yu, H.; Lyu, B. Preparation of Soybean Protein-Based Nanoparticles and Its Application as Encapsulation Carriers of Bioactive Substances. LWT 2023, 191, 115680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Mohammadian, M.; Waly, M.I.; Moghadam, M.; Emam-Djomeh, Z.; Salami, M.; Moosavi-Movahedi, A.A. Nanostructured Food Proteins as Efficient Systems for the Encapsulation of Bioactive Compounds. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2020, 9, 199–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bayraktar, O.; Oder, G.; Erdem, C.; Kose, M.D.; Cheaburu-Yilmaz, C.N. Selective Encapsulation of the Polyphenols on Silk Fibroin Nanoparticles: Optimization Approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Petrovic, S.M.; Barbinta-Patrascu, M.-E. Organic and Biogenic Nanocarriers as Bio-Friendly Systems for Bioactive Compounds’ Delivery: State-of-the Art and Challenges. Materials 2023, 16, 7550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, T.; Li, L.; Chunta, S.; Wu, W.; Chen, Z.; Lu, Y. Enhanced Oral Bioavailability from Food Protein Nanoparticles: A Mini Review. J. Control. Release 2023, 354, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Han, M.; Liu, K.; Liu, X.; Rashid, M.T.; Zhang, H.; Wang, M. Research Progress of Protein-Based Bioactive Substance Nanoparticles. Foods 2023, 12, 2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Saif, A.; Anjum, L.; Faisal, Z.; Akram, N.; Shah, Y.A.; Irfan, R.; Saeed, F.; Afzaal, M.; Asif Shah, M. Recent Advances in Protein-Based Nanoparticles and Their Applications in the Delivery of Bioactive Compounds. Int. J. Food Prop. 2023, 26, 2866–2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Chen, S.; Wu, Q.; Ma, M.; Huang, Z.; Vriesekoop, F.; Liang, H. Designing Biocompatible Protein Nanoparticles for Improving the Cellular Uptake and Antioxidation Activity of Tetrahydrocurcumin. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021, 63, 102404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kaltbeitzel, J.; Wich, P.R. Protein-based Nanoparticles: From Drug Delivery to Imaging, Nanocatalysis and Protein Therapy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202216097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Li, C.; Chen, L.; McClements, D.J.; Peng, X.; Xu, Z.; Meng, M.; Ji, H.; Qiu, C.; Long, J.; Jin, Z. Encapsulation of Polyphenols in Protein-Based Nanoparticles: Preparation, Properties, and Applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Eweje, F.; Walsh, M.L.; Ahmad, K.; Ibrahim, V.; Alrefai, A.; Chen, J.; Chaikof, E.L. Protein-Based Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Nucleic Acid Delivery. Biomaterials 2024, 305, 122464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Liu, F.; Li, M.; Wang, Q.; Yan, J.; Han, S.; Ma, C.; Ma, P.; Liu, X.; McClements, D.J. Future Foods: Alternative Proteins, Food Architecture, Sustainable Packaging, and Precision Nutrition. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 6423–6444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Hefferon, K.L.; De Steur, H.; Perez-Cueto, F.J.; Herring, R. Alternative Protein Innovations and Challenges for Industry and Consumer: An Initial Overview. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2023, 7, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Moura, M.A.F.E.; Martins, B.d.A.; Oliveira, G.P.d.; Takahashi, J.A. Alternative Protein Sources of Plant, Algal, Fungal and Insect Origins for Dietary Diversification in Search of Nutrition and Health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 10691–10708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Ravindran, R.; Jaiswal, A.K. Exploitation of Food Industry Waste for High-Value Products. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Chausali, N.; Saxena, J.; Prasad, R. Nanotechnology as a Sustainable Approach for Combating the Environmental Effects of Climate Change. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 12, 100541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rodrigues, S.M.; Demokritou, P.; Dokoozlian, N.; Hendren, C.O.; Karn, B.; Mauter, M.S.; Sadik, O.A.; Safarpour, M.; Unrine, J.M.; Viers, J.; et al. Nanotechnology for Sustainable Food Production: Promising Opportunities and Scientific Challenges. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 4, 767–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Reddy, N.; Rapisarda, M. Properties and Applications of Nanoparticles from Plant Proteins. Materials 2021, 14, 3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Aswathi, V.P.; Meera, S.; Maria, C.A.; Nidhin, M. Green Synthesis of Nanoparticles from Biodegradable Waste Extracts and Their Applications: A Critical Review. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 377–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Peng, H.; Gan, Z.; Xiong, H.; Luo, M.; Yu, N.; Wen, T.; Wang, R.; Li, Y. Self-Assembly of Protein Nanoparticles from Rice Bran Waste and Their Use as Delivery System for Curcumin. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 6605–6614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Okagu, O.D.; Verma, O.; McClements, D.J.; Udenigwe, C.C. Utilization of Insect Proteins to Formulate Nutraceutical Delivery Systems: Encapsulation and Release of Curcumin Using Mealworm Protein-Chitosan Nano-Complexes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 151, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Akbar, I.; Jaswir, I.; Jamal, P.; Octavianti, F. Fish Gelatin Nanoparticles and Their Food Applications: A Review. Int. Food Res. J. 2017, 24, S255–S264. [Google Scholar]
  131. Salaeh, S.; Ahmed, F.; Ahmed, O.; Sayed, M. Preparation, Characterization and Properties of Protein Nanoparticles from Feather Waste. Egypt. J. Chem. 2020, 63, 993–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Campalani, C.; Causin, V.; Selva, M.; Perosa, A. Fish-Waste-Derived Gelatin and Carbon Dots for Biobased UV-Blocking Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 35148–35156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Lin, M.; Li, Y.; Long, H.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhan, F.; Li, M.; Wu, C.; Liu, Z. Cell Membrane-Camouflaged DOX-Loaded β-Glucan Nanoparticles for Highly Efficient Cancer Immunochemotherapy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 225, 873–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Basumallick, S. Green Synthesis of Chitosan Nano Particles at Different Temperature for Bio-Medical Applications. Asian J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 2023, 07, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Sowmyya, T. Potential Forensic Applications of Carbon Nanodots. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2023, 2603, 012057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Balakumaran, M.D.; Ramachandran, R.; Balashanmugam, P.; Mukeshkumar, D.J.; Kalaichelvan, P.T. Mycosynthesis of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles: Optimization, Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity against Human Pathogens. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 182, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Atta-Allah, A.A.; Ahmed, R.F.; Shahin, A.A.; Hassan, E.A.; El-Bialy, H.A.-A.; El-Fouly, M.Z. Optimizing the Synthesis of Yeast Beta-Glucan via Response Surface Methodology for Nanotechnology Application. BMC Microbiol. 2023, 23, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Tripathi, V.; Yadav, P.; Singh, M.P. Beta Glucan as an Immune Stimulant in Tumor Microenvironment—Insight into Lessons and Promises from Past Decade. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 234, 123617. [Google Scholar]
  139. Shaheen, T.I.; Hussien, G.M.; Mekawey, A.A.; Ghalia, H.H.; El Mokadem, M.T. Facile Extraction of Nanosized β-Glucans from Edible Mushrooms and Their Antitumor Activities. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2022, 111, 104607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Terkula Iber, B.; Azman Kasan, N.; Torsabo, D.; Wese Omuwa, J. A Review of Various Sources of Chitin and Chitosan in Nature. J. Renew. Mater. 2022, 10, 1097–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Khalaf, E.M.; Abood, N.A.; Atta, R.Z.; Ramírez-Coronel, A.A.; Alazragi, R.; Parra, R.M.R.; Abed, O.H.; Abosaooda, M.; Jalil, A.T.; Mustafa, Y.F. Recent Progressions in Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Applications of Chitosan Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 231, 123354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Park, H.-G.; Shim, Y.Y.; Choi, S.-O.; Park, W.-M. New Method Development for Nanoparticle Extraction of Water-Soluble β-(1→3)- d -Glucan from Edible Mushrooms, Sparassis Crispa and Phellinus Linteus. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 2147–2154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Acay, H.; Yildirim, A.; Erdem Güzel, E.; Kaya, N.; Baran, M.F. Evaluation and Characterization of Pleurotus Eryngii Extract-Loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles as Antimicrobial Agents against Some Human Pathogens. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2020, 50, 897–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Yang, Y.; Shi, X.; Sun, M.; Hao, Y.; Li, Y. Comparison of Physicochemical and Rheology Properties of Shiitake Stipes-Derived Chitin Nanocrystals and Nanofibers. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 244, 116468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Boobalan, T.; Sethupathi, M.; Sengottuvelan, N.; Kumar, P.; Balaji, P.; Gulyás, B.; Padmanabhan, P.; Selvan, S.T.; Arun, A. Mushroom-Derived Carbon Dots for Toxic Metal Ion Detection and as Antibacterial and Anticancer Agents. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 5910–5919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Venkateswarlu, S.; Viswanath, B.; Reddy, A.S.; Yoon, M. Fungus-Derived Photoluminescent Carbon Nanodots for Ultrasensitive Detection of Hg2+ Ions and Photoinduced Bactericidal Activity. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 258, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Manimaran, K.; Yanto, D.H.Y.; Kamaraj, C.; Selvaraj, K.; Pandiaraj, S.; Elgorban, A.M.; Vignesh, S.; Kim, H. Eco-Friendly Approaches of Mycosynthesized Copper Oxide Nanoparticles (CuONPs) Using Pleurotus Citrinopileatus Mushroom Extracts and Their Biological Applications. Environ. Res. 2023, 232, 116319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Syed, I.A.; Ahmad, J.; Butt, S.; Ullah, A.; Ahmed, I.; Niaz, Z.; Hayat, S.; Ashique, S.; Zengin, G.; Farid, A. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from Ganoderma Species and Their Activity against Multi Drug Resistant Pathogens. Chem. Biodivers. 2023, e202301304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Dias, C.; Ayyanar, M.; Amalraj, S.; Khanal, P.; Subramaniyan, V.; Das, S.; Gandhale, P.; Biswa, V.; Ali, R.; Gurav, N. Biogenic Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Mushroom Fungus Cordyceps Militaris: Characterization and Mechanistic Insights of Therapeutic Investigation. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2022, 73, 103444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Divya, K.; Jisha, M.S. Chitosan Nanoparticles Preparation and Applications. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Perera, U.M.S.P.; Rajapakse, N. Chitosan Nanoparticles: Preparation, Characterization, and Applications. In Seafood Processing By-Products: Trends and Applications; Kim, S.-K., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 371–387. ISBN 978-1-4614-9590-1. [Google Scholar]
  152. Han, J.-F.; Lou, Q.; Ding, Z.-Z.; Zheng, G.-S.; Ni, Q.-C.; Song, R.-W.; Liu, K.-K.; Zang, J.-H.; Dong, L.; Shen, C.-L. Chemiluminescent Carbon Nanodots for Dynamic and Guided Antibacteria. Light Sci. Appl. 2023, 12, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Bartolomei, B.; Prato, M. The Importance of the Purification Step and the Characterization of the Products in the Synthesis of Carbon Nanodots. Small 2023, 19, 2206714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Yang, P.-C.; Panda, P.K.; Li, C.-H.; Ting, Y.-X.; Ashraf Gandomi, Y.; Hsieh, C.-T. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Functionalized Carbon Nanodots and Their Clusters as Ionic Probe for High Sensitivity and Selectivity for Sulfate Anions with Excellent Detection Level. Polymers 2023, 15, 2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Ahmed, A.; Shahadat, M.; ul Islam, S.; Adnan, R.; Mohamad Ibrahim, M.N.; Ullah, Q. Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties of Green Carbon Nanodots. In Green Carbon Materials for Environmental Analysis: Emerging Research and Future Opportunities; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2023; pp. 25–39. ISBN 1947-5918. [Google Scholar]
  156. Nazibudin, N.A.; Zainuddin, M.F.; Abdullah, C.A.C. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Carbon Quantum Dots: An Updated Review. J. Adv. Res. Fluid Mech. Therm. Sci. 2023, 101, 192–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Amr, M.; Abu-Hussien, S.H.; Ismail, R.; Aboubakr, A.; Wael, R.; Yasser, M.; Hemdan, B.; El-Sayed, S.M.; Bakry, A.; Ebeed, N.M. Utilization of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles from Agaricus Bisporus Extract for Food Safety Application: Synthesis, Characterization, Antimicrobial Efficacy, and Toxicological Assessment. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 15048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Santhosh Kumar, D.S.R.; Senthilkumar, P.; Surendran, L.; Sudhagar, B. Ganoderma lucidum-oriental mushroom mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles conjugated with doxorubicin and evaluation of its anticancer potential on human breast cancer MCF-7/DOX cells. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 9, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Salem, S.S.; Fouda, A. Green Synthesis of Metallic Nanoparticles and Their Prospective Biotechnological Applications: An Overview. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 344–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Primožic, M.; Knez, Ž.; Leitgeb, M. Nanotechnology in Food Science—Food Packaging. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Wani, N.R.; Dar, A.H.; Dash, K.K.; Pandey, V.K.; Srivastava, S.; Jan, S.Y.; Deka, P.; Sabahi, N. Recent Advances in the Production of Bionanomaterials for Development of Sustainable Food Packaging: A Comprehensive Review. Environ. Res. 2023, 237, 116948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Yu, Z.; Boyarkina, V.; Liao, Z.; Lin, M.; Zeng, W.; Lu, X. Boosting Food System Sustainability through Intelligent Packaging: Application of Biodegradable Freshness Indicators. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 3, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Ezati, P.; Khan, A.; Priyadarshi, R.; Bhattacharya, T.; Tammina, S.K.; Rhim, J.-W. Biopolymer-Based UV Protection Functional Films for Food Packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 142, 108771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Huang, F.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Y. Are Biodegradable Mulch Films a Sustainable Solution to Microplastic Mulch Film Pollution? A Biogeochemical Perspective. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 459, 132024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Bhatt, G.S.; Aarthi, S. Biopolymer Sustainable Films for Food Industries: Properties and Application Based on Chitosan. In Tailored Functional Materials for Clean and Sustainable Development; Apple Academic Press: Palm Bay, FL, USA, 2024; ISBN 978-1-00-339476-1. [Google Scholar]
  166. Sultanbawa, F.; Sultanbawa, Y. Mineral Nutrient-Rich Plants—Do They Occur? Appl. Food Res. 2023, 3, 100347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Santa-María, G.E.; Lavres, J.; Rubio, G. The Concept of Mineral Plant Nutrient in the Light of Evolution. Plant Sci. 2023, 334, 111747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Supriatna, J.; Setiawati, M.R.; Sudirja, R.; Suherman, C.; Bonneau, X. Migration from Inorganic to Organic Fertilization for a More Sustainable Oil Palm Agro-Industry. Heliyon 2023, 9, e22868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Sardans, J.; Lambers, H.; Preece, C.; Alrefaei, A.F.; Penuelas, J. Role of Mycorrhizas and Root Exudates in Plant Uptake of Soil Nutrients (Calcium, Iron, Magnesium, and Potassium): Has the Puzzle Been Completely Solved? Plant J. 2023, 114, 1227–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Shen, M.; Liu, S.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, T.; Chen, W. Recent Advances in Stimuli-Response Mechanisms of Nano-Enabled Controlled-Release Fertilizers and Pesticides. Eco-Environ. Health 2023, 2, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Khan, Z.; Thounaojam, T.C.; Chowdhury, D.; Upadhyaya, H. The Role of Selenium and Nano Selenium on Physiological Responses in Plant: A Review. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 100, 409–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Flores-Balderas, X.; Peña-Peña, M.; Rada, K.M.; Alvarez-Alvarez, Y.Q.; Guzmán-Martín, C.A.; Sánchez-Gloria, J.L.; Huang, F.; Ruiz-Ojeda, D.; Morán-Ramos, S.; Springall, R. Beneficial Effects of Plant-Based Diets on Skin Health and Inflammatory Skin Diseases. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Mehta, P.; Tawfeeq, S.; Padte, S.; Sunasra, R.; Desai, H.; Surani, S.; Kashyap, R. Plant-Based Diet and Its Effect on Coronary Artery Disease: A Narrative Review. World J. Clin. Cases 2023, 11, 4752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Salehin, S.; Rasmussen, P.; Mai, S.; Mushtaq, M.; Agarwal, M.; Hasan, S.M.; Salehin, S.; Raja, M.; Gilani, S.; Khalife, W.I. Plant Based Diet and Its Effect on Cardiovascular Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 2023, 20, 3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Thompson, A.S.; Tresserra-Rimbau, A.; Karavasiloglou, N.; Jennings, A.; Cantwell, M.; Hill, C.; Perez-Cornago, A.; Bondonno, N.P.; Murphy, N.; Rohrmann, S. Association of Healthful Plant-Based Diet Adherence with Risk of Mortality and Major Chronic Diseases among Adults in the UK. JAMA Netw. Open 2023, 6, e234714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Wu, H.; Gu, Y.; Meng, G.; Wu, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Huang, T.; Niu, K. Quality of Plant-Based Diet and the Risk of Dementia and Depression among Middle-Aged and Older Population. Age Ageing 2023, 52, afad070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Chiba, M.; Morita, N. Incorporation of Plant-Based Diet Surpasses Current Standards in Therapeutic Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Metabolites 2023, 13, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Wang, Y.B.; Page, A.J.; Gill, T.K.; Melaku, Y.A. The Association between Diet Quality, Plant-Based Diets, Systemic Inflammation, and Mortality Risk: Findings from NHANES. Eur. J. Nutr. 2023, 62, 2723–2737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Sakaguchi, Y.; Kaimori, J.-Y.; Isaka, Y. Plant-Dominant Low Protein Diet: A Potential Alternative Dietary Practice for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Rosenfeld, R.M.; Juszczak, H.M.; Wong, M.A. Scoping Review of the Association of Plant-Based Diet Quality with Health Outcomes. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1211535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Chen, N.; Yao, P.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Xin, N.; Wei, H.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, C. Selenium Nanoparticles: Enhanced Nutrition and Beyond. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 63, 12360–12371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Liu, Y.; Liu, R.; Li, F.; Yu, S.; Nie, Y.; Li, J.-Q.; Pan, C.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, Z.; Diao, J. Nano-Selenium Repaired the Damage Caused by Fungicides on Strawberry Flavor Quality and Antioxidant Capacity by Regulating ABA Biosynthesis and Ripening-Related Transcription Factors. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2024, 198, 105753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Moulick, D.; Mukherjee, A.; Das, A.; Roy, A.; Majumdar, A.; Dhar, A.; Pattanaik, B.K.; Chowardhara, B.; Ghosh, D.; Upadhyay, M.K.; et al. Selenium—An Environmentally Friendly Micronutrient in Agroecosystem in the Modern Era: An Overview of 50-Year Findings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 270, 115832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Kulhánek, M.; Asrade, D.A.; Suran, P.; Sedlář, O.; Černý, J.; Balík, J. Plant Nutrition—New Methods Based on the Lessons of History: A Review. Plants 2023, 12, 4150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Wu, H.; Li, Z. Nano-Enabled Agriculture: How Do Nanoparticles Cross Barriers in Plants? Plant Commun. 2022, 3, 100346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Wang, X.; Xie, H.; Wang, P.; Yin, H. Nanoparticles in Plants: Uptake, Transport and Physiological Activity in Leaf and Root. Materials 2023, 16, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Sembada, A.A.; Lenggoro, I.W. Transport of Nanoparticles into Plants and Their Detection Methods. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Geoffrion, L.D.; Guisbiers, G. Physico-Chemical Properties of Selenium–Tellurium Alloys across the Scales. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 4254–4270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zambonino, M.C.; Quizhpe, E.M.; Jaramillo, F.E.; Rahman, A.; Santiago Vispo, N.; Jeffryes, C.; Dahoumane, S.A. Green Synthesis of Selenium and Tellurium Nanoparticles: Current Trends, Biological Properties and Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Chang, Y.; Huang, J.; Shi, S.; Xu, L.; Lin, H.; Chen, T. Precise-engineering of Se/Te Nanochaperone for Reinvigorating Cancer Radio-immunotherapy. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2212178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Liu, K.; Niu, J.; Liu, L.; Tian, F.; Nie, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, K.; Zhao, R.; Sun, S.; Jiao, M.; et al. LUMO-Mediated Se and HOMO-Mediated Te Nanozymes for Selective Redox Biocatalysis. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 5131–5140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Beleneva, I.A.; Kharchenko, U.V.; Kukhlevsky, A.D.; Boroda, A.V.; Izotov, N.V.; Gnedenkov, A.S.; Egorkin, V.S. Biogenic Synthesis of Selenium and Tellurium Nanoparticles by Marine Bacteria and Their Biological Activity. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 38, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Nwoko, K.C.; Liang, X.; Perez, M.A.; Krupp, E.; Gadd, G.M.; Feldmann, J. Characterisation of Selenium and Tellurium Nanoparticles Produced by Aureobasidium Pullulans Using a Multi-Method Approach. J. Chromatogr. A 2021, 1642, 462022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Shah, V.; Medina-Cruz, D.; Vernet-Crua, A.; Truong, L.B.; Sotelo, E.; Mostafavi, E.; González, M.U.; García-Martín, J.M.; Cholula-Díaz, J.L.; Webster, T.J. Pepper-Mediated Green Synthesis of Selenium and Tellurium Nanoparticles with Antibacterial and Anticancer Potential. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022, 14, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Zhu, H.; Fan, L.; Wang, K.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Yan, S. Progress in the Synthesis and Application of Tellurium Nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Abo Elsoud, M.M.; Al-Hagar, O.E.A.; Abdelkhalek, E.S.; Sidkey, N.M. Synthesis and Investigations on Tellurium Myconanoparticles. Biotechnol. Rep. 2018, 18, e00247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Reddy, G.K.K.; Pathak, S.; Nancharaiah, Y.V. Aerobic Reduction of Selenite and Tellurite to Elemental Selenium and Tellurium Nanostructures by Alteromonas Sp. under Saline Conditions. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2023, 179, 105571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Saikia, S.; Sinharoy, A.; Lens, P.N.L. Adsorptive Removal of Gallium from Aqueous Solution onto Biogenic Elemental Tellurium Nanoparticles. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 286, 120462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Sathiyaseelan, A.; Zhang, X.; Wang, M.-H. Biosynthesis of Gallic Acid Fabricated Tellurium Nanoparticles (GA-Te NPs) for Enhanced Antibacterial, Antioxidant, and Cytotoxicity Applications. Environ. Res. 2024, 240, 117461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Hosseini, F.; Hadian, M.; Lashani, E.; Moghimi, H. Simultaneous Bioreduction of Tellurite and Selenite by Yarrowia Lipolytica, Trichosporon Cutaneum, and Their Co-Culture along with Characterization of Biosynthesized Te–Se Nanoparticles. Microb. Cell Factories 2023, 22, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Nikam, P.B.; Salunkhe, J.D.; Minkina, T.; Rajput, V.D.; Kim, B.S.; Patil, S.V. A Review on Green Synthesis and Recent Applications of Red Nano Selenium. Results Chem. 2022, 4, 100581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Shi, M.-T.; Zhang, T.-J.; Fang, Y.; Pan, C.-P.; Fu, H.-Y.; Gao, S.-J. Nano-Selenium Enhances Sugarcane Resistance to Xanthomonas Albilineans Infection and Improvement of Juice Quality. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 254, 114759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Ghanbari, F.; Bag-Nazari, M.; Azizi, A. Exogenous Application of Selenium and Nano-Selenium Alleviates Salt Stress and Improves Secondary Metabolites in Lemon Verbena under Salinity Stress. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Yu, H.; Miao, P.; Li, D.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, C.; Pan, C. Improving Red Pitaya Fruit Quality by Nano-Selenium Biofortification to Enhance Phenylpropanoid and Betalain Biosynthesis. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 267, 115653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Sindireva, A.; Golubkina, N.; Bezuglova, H.; Fedotov, M.; Alpatov, A.; Erdenotsogt, E.; Sękara, A.; Murariu, O.C.; Caruso, G. Effects of High Doses of Selenate, Selenite and Nano-Selenium on Biometrical Characteristics, Yield and Biofortification Levels of Vicia Faba L. Cultivars. Plants 2023, 12, 2847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Ali, A.; Mashwani, Z.-R.; Raja, N.I.; Mohammad, S.; Luna-Arias, J.P.; Ahmad, A.; Kaushik, P. Phytomediated Selenium Nanoparticles and Light Regimes Elicited in Vitro Callus Cultures for Biomass Accumulation and Secondary Metabolite Production in Caralluma Tuberculata. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1253193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Jiao, L.; Cao, X.; Wang, C.; Chen, F.; Zou, H.; Yue, L.; Wang, Z. Crosstalk between in Situ Root Exudates and Rhizobacteria to Promote Rice Growth by Selenium Nanomaterials. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 878, 163175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Ran, M.; Wu, T.; Jiao, Y.; Wu, J.; Li, J. Selenium Bio-Nanocomposite Based on Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS): Synthesis, Characterization and Application in Alleviating Cadmium Toxicity in Rice (Oryza Sativa L.). Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 258, 129089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Shang, H.; Ma, C.; Li, C.; Cai, Z.; Shen, Y.; Han, L.; Wang, C.; Tran, J.; Elmer, W.H.; White, J.C. Aloe Vera Extract Gel-Biosynthesized Selenium Nanoparticles Enhance Disease Resistance in Lettuce by Modulating the Metabolite Profile and Bacterial Endophytes Composition. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 13672–13684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Kang, L.; Wu, Y.; Jia, Y.; Chen, Z.; Kang, D.; Zhang, L.; Pan, C. Nano-Selenium Enhances Melon Resistance to Podosphaera Xanthii by Enhancing the Antioxidant Capacity and Promoting Alterations in the Polyamine, Phenylpropanoid and Hormone Signaling Pathways. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Jia, Y.; Kang, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, C.; Cai, R.; Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Chen, Z.; Kang, D.; Zhang, L. Nano-selenium Foliar Intervention-induced Resistance of Cucumber to Botrytis Cinerea by Activating Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis and Regulating Phenolic Acid and Cucurbitacin. Pest Manag. Sci. 2023, 80, 554–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Shahbaz, M.; Akram, A.; Mehak, A.; ul Haq, E.; Fatima, N.; Wareen, G.; Fitriatin, B.N.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Ilyas, N.; Sabullah, M.K. Evaluation of Selenium Nanoparticles in Inducing Disease Resistance against Spot Blotch Disease and Promoting Growth in Wheat under Biotic Stress. Plants 2023, 12, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Tran, T.H.; Le, X.C.; Tran, T.N.M.; Nguyen, N.T.T.; Pham, B.N.; Vu, D. Nano Selenium–Alginate Edible Coating Extends Hydroponic Strawberry Shelf Life and Provides Selenium Fortification as a Micro-Nutrient. Food Biosci. 2023, 53, 102597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Samynathan, R.; Venkidasamy, B.; Ramya, K.; Muthuramalingam, P.; Shin, H.; Kumari, P.S.; Thangavel, S.; Sivanesan, I. A Recent Update on the Impact of Nano-Selenium on Plant Growth, Metabolism, and Stress Tolerance. Plants 2023, 12, 853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. El-Batal, A.I.; Ismail, M.A.; Amin, M.A.; El-Sayyad, G.S.; Osman, M.S. Selenium Nanoparticles Induce Growth and Physiological Tolerance of Wastewater-stressed Carrot Plants. Biologia 2023, 78, 2339–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Wang, Y.; Rao, C.; Huang, L.; Wu, J.; Sun, P.; Zhan, J.; Wu, J.; Liu, S.; Zhou, C.; Hu, L. Effects of Organic Selenium and Nanoselenium on Drought Stress of Pak Choi (Brassica Chinensis Var. Pekinensis. Cv.‘Suzhouqing’) and Its Transcriptomic Analysis. Agronomy 2023, 14, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Li, L.; Liu, Z.; Quan, J.; Sun, J.; Lu, J.; Zhao, G. Dietary Nano-Selenium Alleviates Heat Stress-Induced Intestinal Damage through Affecting Intestinal Antioxidant Capacity and Microbiota in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2023, 133, 108537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Rathore, S.S.; Hanumappa, S.M.; Yusufzai, S.I.; Suyani, N.K.; Abdullah-Al-Mamun, M.; Nasren, S.; Sidiq, M.J.; Hanumanthappa, S.K.; Kalyani, R. Dietary Administration of Engineered Nano-Selenium and Vitamin C Ameliorates Immune Response, Nutritional Physiology, Oxidative Stress, and Resistance Against Aeromonas Hydrophila in Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus). Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 4079–4092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Mansuriya, B.D.; Altintas, Z. Carbon Dots: Classification, Properties, Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications in Health Care—An Updated Review (2018–2021). Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Chandel, M.; Kaur, K.; Sahu, B.K.; Sharma, S.; Panneerselvam, R.; Shanmugam, V. Promise of Nano-Carbon to the next Generation Sustainable Agriculture. Carbon 2022, 188, 461–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Bhattacharya, N.; Cahill, D.M.; Yang, W.; Kochar, M. Graphene as a Nano-Delivery Vehicle in Agriculture–Current Knowledge and Future Prospects. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2023, 43, 851–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Mukherjee, A.; Majumdar, S.; Servin, A.D.; Pagano, L.; Dhankher, O.P.; White, J.C. Carbon Nanomaterials in Agriculture: A Critical Review. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Mocci, F.; de Villiers Engelbrecht, L.; Olla, C.; Cappai, A.; Casula, M.F.; Melis, C.; Stagi, L.; Laaksonen, A.; Carbonaro, C.M. Carbon Nanodots from an in Silico Perspective. Chem. Rev. 2022, 122, 13709–13799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Zhu, L.; Chen, L.; Gu, J.; Ma, H.; Wu, H. Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for Sustainable Agriculture: Their Application as Light Converters, Nanosensors, and Delivery Tools. Plants 2022, 11, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Rezaei Cherati, S.; Anas, M.; Liu, S.; Shanmugam, S.; Pandey, K.; Angtuaco, S.; Shelton, R.; Khalfaoui, A.N.; Alena, S.V.; Porter, E. Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Carbon Nanotubes Used for Agricultural Applications. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 12061–12072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Safdar, M.; Kim, W.; Park, S.; Gwon, Y.; Kim, Y.-O.; Kim, J. Engineering Plants with Carbon Nanotubes: A Sustainable Agriculture Approach. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2022, 20, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Tiwari, D.K.; Dasgupta-Schubert, N.; Villaseñor Cendejas, L.M.; Villegas, J.; Carreto Montoya, L.; Borjas García, S.E. Interfacing Carbon Nanotubes (CNT) with Plants: Enhancement of Growth, Water and Ionic Nutrient Uptake in Maize (Zea Mays) and Implications for Nanoagriculture. Appl. Nanosci. 2014, 4, 577–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Lahiani, M.H.; Nima, Z.A.; Villagarcia, H.; Biris, A.S.; Khodakovskaya, M.V. Assessment of Effects of the Long-Term Exposure of Agricultural Crops to Carbon Nanotubes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 66, 6654–6662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Nepal, J.; Xin, X.; Maltais-Landry, G.; Ahmad, W.; Pereira, J.; Santra, S.; Wright, A.L.; Ogram, A.; Stofella, P.J.; He, Z. Carbon Nanomaterials Are a Superior Soil Amendment for Sandy Soils than Biochar Based on Impacts on Lettuce Growth, Physiology and Soil Biochemical Quality. NanoImpact 2023, 31, 100480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Kharlamova, M.V.; Kramberger, C. Cytotoxicity of Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, Fullerenes, and Dots. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Krumova, S.; Petrova, A.; Petrova, N.; Stoichev, S.; Ilkov, D.; Tsonev, T.; Petrov, P.; Koleva, D.; Velikova, V. Seed Priming with Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Grafted with Pluronic P85 Preserves the Functional and Structural Characteristics of Pea Plants. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Fu, T.; Zhang, B.; Gao, X.; Cui, S.; Guan, C.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Peng, Y. Recent Progresses, Challenges, and Opportunities of Carbon-Based Materials Applied in Heavy Metal Polluted Soil Remediation. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 856, 158810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Sk, M.P.; Jaiswal, A.; Paul, A.; Ghosh, S.S.; Chattopadhyay, A. Presence of Amorphous Carbon Nanoparticles in Food Caramels. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Husen, A. Carbon-Based Nanomaterials and Their Interactions with Agricultural Crops. In Nanomaterials for Agriculture and Forestry Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 199–218. [Google Scholar]
  235. Samadi, S.; Asgari Lajayer, B.; Moghiseh, E.; Rodríguez-Couto, S. Effect of Carbon Nanomaterials on Cell Toxicity, Biomass Production, Nutritional and Active Compound Accumulation in Plants. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Shojaei, T.R.; Salleh, M.A.M.; Tabatabaei, M.; Mobli, H.; Aghbashlo, M.; Rashid, S.A.; Tan, T. Applications of Nanotechnology and Carbon Nanoparticles in Agriculture. In Synthesis, Technology and Applications of Carbon Nanomaterials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 247–277. [Google Scholar]
  237. Mittal, D.; Kaur, G.; Singh, P.; Yadav, K.; Ali, S.A. Nanoparticle-Based Sustainable Agriculture and Food Science: Recent Advances and Future Outlook. Front. Nanotechnol. 2020, 2, 579954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Hao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Sun, G.; Gong, X.; Jiang, Y.; Lv, G.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, D. Effects of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Nano-Silica on Root Development, Leaf Photosynthesis, Active Oxygen and Nitrogen Metabolism in Maize. Plants 2023, 12, 1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  239. Nurdin, M.; Sari, I.D.W.; Mardhatillah, M.; Herdianto, N.; Wibowo, D.; Maulidiyah, M.; Mappasomba, M.; Ansharullah, A.; Bijang, C. Highly Ecofriendly Inorganic Pesticide Based on TiO2 Incorporated with Nano-Carbon Composites for Phytophthora Palmivora Fungus Disinfection. Indian J. Microbiol. 2023, 63, 216–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Zhao, F.; Xin, X.; Cao, Y.; Su, D.; Ji, P.; Zhu, Z.; He, Z. Use of Carbon Nanoparticles to Improve Soil Fertility, Crop Growth and Nutrient Uptake by Corn (Zea Mays L.). Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Behpour, M.; Shadi, M.; Nojavan, S. Preparation of an Efficient Magnetic Nano-Sorbent Based on Modified Cellulose and Carboxylated Carbon Nano-Tubes for Extraction of Pesticides from Food and Agricultural Water Samples before GC-FID Analysis. Food Chem. 2023, 407, 135067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Liang, L.; Wong, S.C.; Lisak, G. Effects of Plastic-Derived Carbon Dots on Germination and Growth of Pea (Pisum Sativum) via Seed Nano-Priming. Chemosphere 2023, 316, 137868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Jing, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.-F.; You, C.; Chang, D.; Zhang, S. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots Enhanced Seedling Growth and Salt Tolerance with Distinct Requirements of Excitation Light. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 12114–12122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Panahirad, S.; Dadpour, M.; Gohari, G.; Akbari, A.; Mahdavinia, G.; Jafari, H.; Kulak, M.; Alcázar, R.; Fotopoulos, V. Putrescine-Functionalized Carbon Quantum Dot (Put-CQD) Nanoparticle: A Promising Stress-Protecting Agent against Cadmium Stress in Grapevine (Vitis Vinifera Cv. Sultana). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 197, 107653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Zhao, W.-B.; Wang, Y.; Li, F.-K.; Guo, R.; Jiao, F.-H.; Song, S.-Y.; Chang, S.-L.; Dong, L.; Liu, K.-K.; Shan, C.-X. Highly Antibacterial and Antioxidative Carbon Nanodots/Silk Fibroin Films for Fruit Preservation. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 11755–11762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Gao, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, L.; Jia, M.; Li, X.; Li, J. Nano-Biosensor Based on Manganese Dioxide Nanosheets and Carbon Dots for Dual-Mode Determination of Staphylococcus Aureus. Food Chem. 2024, 432, 137144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Zaim, N.S.H.B.H.; Tan, H.L.; Rahman, S.M.A.; Abu Bakar, N.F.; Osman, M.S.; Thakur, V.K.; Radacsi, N. Recent Advances in Seed Coating Treatment Using Nanoparticles and Nanofibers for Enhanced Seed Germination and Protection. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 7374–7402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Fincheira, P.; Hoffmann, N.; Tortella, G.; Ruiz, A.; Cornejo, P.; Diez, M.C.; Seabra, A.B.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Rubilar, O. Eco-Efficient Systems Based on Nanocarriers for the Controlled Release of Fertilizers and Pesticides: Toward Smart Agriculture. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Kumar, R.; Kumar, N.; Rajput, V.D.; Mandzhieva, S.; Minkina, T.; Saharan, B.S.; Kumar, D.; Sadh, P.K.; Duhan, J.S. Advances in Biopolymeric Nanopesticides: A New Eco-Friendly/Eco-Protective Perspective in Precision Agriculture. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Gao, W.; You, C.; Wang, X. Cellulose Nanofibers Extracted from Natural Wood Improve the Postharvest Appearance Quality of Apples. Front. Nutr. 2022, 9, 881783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Bao, J.; Hu, Y.; Farag, M.A.; Huan, W.; Wu, J.; Yang, D.; Song, L. Carbon Dots, Cellulose Nanofiber, and Essential Oil from Torreya Grandis Aril Added to Fish Scale Gelatin Film for Tomato Preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 245, 125482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Shi, C.; Fang, D.; Huang, C.; Lyu, L.; Wu, W.; Li, W. Electrospun Biopolymer Material for Antimicrobial Function of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables: Application Perspective and Challenges. LWT 2023, 174, 114374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Sharma, N.; Allardyce, B.J.; Rajkhowa, R.; Agrawal, R. Biodegradable Cellulose and Cellulose Nanofibres-Based Coating Materials as a Postharvest Preservative for Horticultural Products. J. Polym. Environ. 2024, 32, 1500–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Jamróz, E.; Kopel, P.; Tkaczewska, J.; Dordevic, D.; Jancikova, S.; Kulawik, P.; Milosavljevic, V.; Dolezelikova, K.; Smerkova, K.; Svec, P.; et al. Nanocomposite Furcellaran Films—The Influence of Nanofillers on Functional Properties of Furcellaran Films and Effect on Linseed Oil Preservation. Polymers 2019, 11, 2046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Shaghaleh, H.; Hamoud, Y.A.; Sun, Q. Functionalized Nanocellulose Nanocomposite Hydrogels for Soil and Water Pollution Prevention, Remediation, and Monitoring: A Critical Review on Fabrication, Application Properties, and Potential Mechanisms. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 111892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Cota-Leal, M.; García-Valenzuela, J.A.; Borbón-Nuñez, H.A.; Cota, L.; Olivas, A. CuS/Cellulose Acetate Nanofiber Composite: A Study on Adsorption and Photocatalytic Activity for Water Remediation. Polymer 2023, 293, 126627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Pratim Das, P.; Kalyani, P.; Kumar, R.; Khandelwal, M. Cellulose-Based Natural Nanofibers for Fresh Produce Packaging: Current Status, Sustainability and Future Outlook. Sustain. Food Technol. 2023, 1, 528–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Jiang, L.; Huang, X.; Tian, C.; Zhong, Y.; Yan, M.; Miao, C.; Wu, T.; Zhou, X. Preparation and Characterization of Porous Cellulose Acetate Nanofiber Hydrogels. Gels 2023, 9, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Lv, H.; Wang, C.; He, D.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, M.; Xu, E.; Jin, Z.; Yuan, C.; Guo, L.; Wu, Z.; et al. Intelligent Food Tag: A Starch-Anthocyanin-Based pH-Sensitive Electrospun Nanofiber Mat for Real-Time Food Freshness Monitoring. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 256, 128384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Brandão, R.M.; Batista, L.R.; de Oliveira, J.E.; Barbosa, R.B.; Nelson, D.L.; Cardoso, M.G. In Vitro and in Vivo Efficacy of Poly (Lactic Acid) Nanofiber Packaging Containing Essential Oils from Ocimum Basilicum L. and Ocimum Gratissimum L. against Aspergillus Carbonarius and Aspergillus Niger in Table Grapes. Food Chem. 2023, 400, 134087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Du, Z.; Lv, H.; Wang, C.; He, D.; Xu, E.; Jin, Z.; Yuan, C.; Guo, L.; Wu, Z.; Liu, P. Organic Solvent-Free Starch-Based Green Electrospun Nanofiber Mats for Curcumin Encapsulation and Delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 232, 123497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  262. Ji, S.H.; Yun, J.S. Natural Cellulose-Based Multifunctional Nanofibers for the Effective Removal of Particulate Matter and Volatile Organic Compounds. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Soares, A.C.; Soares, J.C.; Dos Santos, D.M.; Migliorini, F.L.; Popolin-Neto, M.; dos Santos Cinelli Pinto, D.; Carvalho, W.A.; Brandão, H.M.; Paulovich, F.V.; Correa, D.S. Nanoarchitectonic E-Tongue of Electrospun Zein/Curcumin Carbon Dots for Detecting Staphylococcus Aureus in Milk. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 13721–13732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Chen, Y.; Yang, C.; Hu, J.; Huang, M.; Zhao, L.; He, J.; Zhang, S.; Shen, F.; Tian, D. Cascade utilization of crop straw through a FeCl3-mediated deep eutectic solvent biorefinery: Lignin-containing cellulose nanofibers flocculant fabrication followed by fertilizer production. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 472, 144823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Priya, E.; Jha, A.; Sarkar, S.; Maji, P.K. A Urea-Loaded Hydrogel Comprising of Cellulose Nanofibers and Carboxymethyl Cellulose: An Effective Slow-Release Fertilizer. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 434, 140215. [Google Scholar]
  266. Wagh, R.V.; Khan, A.; Priyadarshi, R.; Ezati, P.; Rhim, J.-W. Cellulose Nanofiber-Based Multifunctional Films Integrated with Carbon Dots and Anthocyanins from Brassica Oleracea for Active and Intelligent Food Packaging Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 233, 123567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  267. Stie, M.B.; Öblom, H.; Hansen, A.C.N.; Jacobsen, J.; Chronakis, I.S.; Rantanen, J.; Nielsen, H.M.; Genina, N. Mucoadhesive Chitosan- and Cellulose Derivative-Based Nanofiber-on-Foam-on-Film System for Non-Invasive Peptide Delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 303, 120429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Ahmad, M.A.; Adeel, M.; Shakoor, N.; Ali, I.; Ishfaq, M.; Haider, F.U.; Deng, X. Unraveling the Roles of Modified Nanomaterials in Nano Enabled Agriculture. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 202, 107944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Singh, R.; Dutt, S.; Sharma, P.; Sundramoorthy, A.K.; Dubey, A.; Singh, A.; Arya, S. Future of Nanotechnology in Food Industry: Challenges in Processing, Packaging, and Food Safety. Glob. Chall. 2023, 7, 2200209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Shelar, A.; Nile, S.H.; Singh, A.V.; Rothenstein, D.; Bill, J.; Xiao, J.; Chaskar, M.; Kai, G.; Patil, R. Recent Advances in Nano-Enabled Seed Treatment Strategies for Sustainable Agriculture: Challenges, Risk Assessment, and Future Perspectives. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023, 15, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  271. Fu, D.; Duan, L.; Li, X.; Jiang, C.; Zhang, T.; Chen, W. Citrate-Promoted Dissolution of Nanostructured Manganese Oxides: Implications for Nano-Enabled Sustainable Agriculture. J. Environ. Sci. 2023, 125, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  272. Pagano, L.; Rossi, R.; White, J.C.; Marmiroli, N.; Marmiroli, M. Nanomaterials Biotransformation: In Planta Mechanisms of Action. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 318, 120834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Chen, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Gong, P.; Su, Z.; Fan, L.; Li, G. Emerging Nanoparticles in Food: Sources, Application, and Safety. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 3564–3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Wasilewska, A.; Bielicka, M.; Klekotka, U.; Kalska-Szostko, B. Nanoparticle Applications in Food—A Review. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 2544–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Jahani, R.; Behnamian, M.; Dezhsetan, S.; Karimirad, R.; Chamani, E. Chitosan Nano-Biopolymer/Citrus Paradisi Peel Oil Delivery System Enhanced Shelf-Life and Postharvest Quality of Cherry Tomato. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 225, 1212–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Cheng, J.; Wang, H. Construction and Application of Nano ZnO/Eugenol@yam Starch/Microcrystalline Cellulose Active Antibacterial Film. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 239, 124215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Liao, J.; Zhou, Y.; Hou, B.; Zhang, J.; Huang, H. Nano-Chitin: Preparation Strategies and Food Biopolymer Film Reinforcement and Applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2023, 305, 120553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Verstegen, J.; Günther, K. Ubiquitous Occurrence of Nano Selenium in Food Plants. Foods 2023, 12, 3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  279. Manikandan, N.A.; McCann, R.; Kakavas, D.; Rochfort, K.D.; Sreenilayam, S.P.; Alkan, G.; Stornetta, T.; McGivern, A.R.; Grintzalis, K.; Friedrich, B. Production of Silver Nano-Inks and Surface Coatings for Anti-Microbial Food Packaging and Its Ecological Impact. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Rathee, S.; Ojha, A.; Upadhyay, A.; Xiao, J.; Bajpai, V.K.; Ali, S.; Shukla, S. Biogenic Engineered Nanomaterials for Enhancing Bioavailability via Developing Nano-Iron-Fortified Smart Foods: Advances, Insight, and Prospects of Nanobionics in Fortification of Food. Food Funct. 2023, 14, 9083–9099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  281. Wang, Y.; Tang, J.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, X.; Chen, M.; Dai, J.; Li, S.; Qin, W.; Liu, Y. Nanofibrous Composite Membranes Based on Chitosan-Nano Zinc Oxide and Curcumin for Kyoho Grapes Preservation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 242, 124661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  282. Zheng, Y.; Jia, X.; Zhao, Z.; Ran, Y.; Du, M.; Ji, H.; Pan, Y.; Li, Z.; Ma, X.; Liu, Y. Innovative Natural Antimicrobial Natamycin Incorporated Titanium Dioxide (Nano-TiO2)/Poly (Butylene Adipate-Co-Terephthalate)(PBAT)/Poly (Lactic Acid)(PLA) Biodegradable Active Film (NTP@PLA) and Application in Grape Preservation. Food Chem. 2023, 400, 134100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  283. Wei, N.; Yang, J.; Miao, J.; Jia, R.; Qin, Z. Production of the Protein-Based Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Quantum Dots/TiO2 Nanoparticles with Rapid and Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Hexavalent Chromium. J. Photochem. Photobiol. Chem. 2023, 444, 114947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Some suggested farming systems, challenges and solutions focused on types of mushroom farming, as well as some applications of nanotechnology in agri-food production [30,61].
Figure 1. Some suggested farming systems, challenges and solutions focused on types of mushroom farming, as well as some applications of nanotechnology in agri-food production [30,61].
Agronomy 14 00606 g001
Figure 2. Some key facts about agriculture on the global level according to the FAO [65].
Figure 2. Some key facts about agriculture on the global level according to the FAO [65].
Agronomy 14 00606 g002
Figure 3. Major global food commodities according to the FAO [65].
Figure 3. Major global food commodities according to the FAO [65].
Agronomy 14 00606 g003
Figure 4. Applications of nanotechnology in agri-food production (part I) and in the food industry (part II) [21,31].
Figure 4. Applications of nanotechnology in agri-food production (part I) and in the food industry (part II) [21,31].
Agronomy 14 00606 g004
Figure 6. Plant nano-nutrients, methods of application (part I), their uptake by leaves (part II) and roots (part III), potential mechanisms of uptake into plant cells (part IV), and factors controlling this uptake [185,186,187]. Plant image from https://www.cleanpng.com/png-biostimulant-fertilisers-agriculture-soil-foliar-f-5425521/, accessed on 6 January 2024.
Figure 6. Plant nano-nutrients, methods of application (part I), their uptake by leaves (part II) and roots (part III), potential mechanisms of uptake into plant cells (part IV), and factors controlling this uptake [185,186,187]. Plant image from https://www.cleanpng.com/png-biostimulant-fertilisers-agriculture-soil-foliar-f-5425521/, accessed on 6 January 2024.
Agronomy 14 00606 g006
Figure 8. Carbon nanodots (CNDs) have been purified from Coke (photo A) and from soil used to grow Oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus L.) (photo B). A suggested model of CND formation (Part C) as presented by the Nano-Food Lab, University of Debrecen, Hungary (Photos by Duyen H.H. Nguyen).
Figure 8. Carbon nanodots (CNDs) have been purified from Coke (photo A) and from soil used to grow Oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus L.) (photo B). A suggested model of CND formation (Part C) as presented by the Nano-Food Lab, University of Debrecen, Hungary (Photos by Duyen H.H. Nguyen).
Agronomy 14 00606 g008
Figure 9. A diagram showing current and future suggested applications of the main sectors covered in this review (mushrooms, proteins, nano-nutrients, and nanofibers) that can be applied to nano-farming. Some selected applications are listed, focusing on the possible interactions among the four studied sectors (source: collected and summarized from references in the review).
Figure 9. A diagram showing current and future suggested applications of the main sectors covered in this review (mushrooms, proteins, nano-nutrients, and nanofibers) that can be applied to nano-farming. Some selected applications are listed, focusing on the possible interactions among the four studied sectors (source: collected and summarized from references in the review).
Agronomy 14 00606 g009
Table 1. The characterization of mushroom-based nanoparticles and the potential applications.
Table 1. The characterization of mushroom-based nanoparticles and the potential applications.
Source/Produced NanoparticlesMushroom SpeciesNano Size (nm)ApplicationRef.
Water-soluble
β-(1→3)-d-glucan
Sparassis crispa; Phellinus linteus150–390Food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical industries[142]
β-glucans Lentinula edodes10–25Cancer treatment and therapeutic interventions[139]
β-glucansPleurotus ostreatus40–50Cancer treatment and therapeutic interventions[139]
Chitosan nanoparticles Pleurotus eryngii2.25Antimicrobial coatings, drug delivery systems, wound dressings, food additives[143]
Chitin nanocrystalsLentinula edodes142–182Biomedical applications, drug encapsulation, polymer composite, cosmetics, textile industry[144]
Carbon nanodotsPleurotus spp.4.7–8.8Cancer treatment and therapeutic interventions, antimicrobial coatings, drug delivery systems, wound dressings, food additives[145]
Carbon nanodotsPleurotus spp.2–10Ultrasensitive detection of Hg2+ ions and photoinduced bactericidal activity[146]
Copper oxide nanoparticlesPleurotus citrinopileatus20Biomedical applications (mainly antimicrobial and anticancer) [147]
Silver nanoparticlesGanoderma spp.------Antibacterial and therapeutic agents[148]
Zinc oxide nanoparticlesCordyceps militaris1.83 Therapeutic investigations as antioxidant, antidiabetic, and antibacterial potential[149]
Table 2. Applications of nano-selenium in different farming practices.
Table 2. Applications of nano-selenium in different farming practices.
CropApplied Dose of Nano-SeFarming PracticesMain Impacts of Nano-Se Refs.
Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids)Foliar application of 5 and 10 mg L−1Growing seedlings under biotic stressNano-Se enhanced antioxidants and jasmonic acid content; reduced accumulation of ROS and H2O2 under biotic stress as an eco-fungicide.[202]
Lemon verbena (Lippia citriodora Kunth)Foliar application of 10 uM nano-SeBefore full flowering stageNano-Se alleviated salt stress by improving secondary metabolites (protein, proline, and soluble sugars) and antioxidants.[203]
Red Pitaya (Hylocereus undatus)Foliar at 5 mg L−1 and soil at 3 mg L−1Biofortification of fruits and post-harvest Nano-Se enhanced antioxidant capacity and nutritional value by boosting biosynthesis of amino acids, phenylpropanoid, and betalain.[204]
Faba bean (Vicia faba L.)Foliar application at 100 mg L−1Biofortification of bean seedsNano-Se improved the seed weight, yield and quality, and biofortification level. [205]
Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Applied 50 and 100 ppm nano-Se and nano-SiControl Alternaria leaf spot diseaseApplied nano-Se and nano-Si was an effective alternative to fungicide against the studied phytopathogen.[53]
Caralluma tuberculataIn vitro containing 100 µg L−1 nano-SeProducing secondary metabolitesSe-NPs elicited the production of antidiabetic metabolites (gallic acid, cumarin, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, catechin, quercetin and rutin).[206]
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Applied nano-Se to soil at 0.1 mg·kg−1Rice seedling growthNano-Se enhanced root exudates and rhizobacteria, which promoted rice growth by increasing malic and citric acid content. [207]
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)Se bio-nanocompositeAlleviating cadmium toxicityApplied nanocomposite alleviated the inhibition of plant growth and Cd-oxidative stress by reducing Cd accumulation in rice plants.[208]
Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.)Applied Se-NPs to the soil at 50 mg kg−1Enhancing plant disease resistanceSe-NPs suppressed Fusarium-induced wilt disease in lettuce by modulating the shoot metabolite levels of citrate, succinate, malate and upregulated jasmonic acid.[209]
Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa)Nano-Se at 25, 50, 75, and 100 mg L−1Seedling productionSe-NPs enhanced growth of seedlings by promoting nutritional status, photosynthetic pigments, and enzymatic antioxidants. [28]
Table 3. Different applications of carbon nanodots for farming practices and food production.
Table 3. Different applications of carbon nanodots for farming practices and food production.
Type of C NanodotFarming PracticesMain Impacts Refs.
Multi-walled carbon nano-tubes (MCNs)Seedling development An application of 800 mg·L−1 MCN promoted maize root length, height, seedling dry weight, and photosynthesis enzymes related to nitrogen metabolism in maize seedlings.[238]
Nano-carbon compositesNano-pesticide against fungusApplied nanocomposite of C-TiO2 inhibited the fungus Phytophthora palmivora, serving as a disinfectant for agricultural plant pathogens.[239]
Carbon nanomaterials (CNMs)Amendment of sandy soilsCNMs applied at 200–400 mg kg−1 increased shoot biomass of lettuce, total chlorophyll content, photosynthesis activity, and bioavailability of soil nutrients. [229]
Carbon nanoparticles (CNPs)Soil fertility improvementCNPs applied at 200 mg kg−1 enhanced maize growth by improving nutrient use efficiency, plant height, the uptake of nutrients, and biomass yield.[240]
Carbon nano-tubesMagnetic nano-sorption pesticidesUsing magnetic nanocomposite cellulose for sorption agro-pesticide samples due to high porosity, high surface area and good reusability up to 15 times for the extraction of pesticides.[241]
Carbon dots (CDs)Seed nano-primingCDs applied at 0.25–2 mg mL−1 accelerated germination of pea seeds, increased biomass accumulation and elongation of shoots and roots compared to the control.[242]
Nitrogen -doped carbon dots (N-CDs)Seedlings growth under salt stress (150 mM NaCl)N-CDs enhanced Arabidopsis salt stress tolerance and induced plant growth, chlorophyll content, and reduced malondialdehyde content compared to the control.[243]
Carbon quantum dots (CQDs)Protecting agent against Cd-stressPutrescine-functionalized-CQD-NPs increased the fresh and dry leaf weight of grapes and mediated Cd-stress by promoting enzymatic activity, anthocyanin. and phenolics.[244]
Carbon nanodotsFood preservation Carbon nano-dot/silk fibroin films were antibacterial and antioxidative films that increased fruit preservation as a multifunctional and eco-friendly packaging system.[245]
MnO2 nano-sheets and carbon dot (MnO2-CD)Nano-biosensor for food safetyThe MnO2-CD was an efficient nano-biosensor for Staphylococcus aureus having higher stability, good biocompatibility, and catalytic activity compared to natural enzymes.[246]
Table 4. The applications of nanofibers in farming practices and the food sector.
Table 4. The applications of nanofibers in farming practices and the food sector.
Nanofibers (NFs)Farming PracticesMain Impacts of NFs Refs.
Natural multifunctional nanofibers from cellulose Multi-functional air filtrationThe NFs created an eco-friendly filter to remove indoor pollutants like volatile organic compounds and particulate matter. [262]
Zein nanofibers coated by carbon dotsDairy farmingNFs were able to detect the pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, which causes mammary infections in dairy cows.[263]
Cellulose nanofibers based on ligninFarmland drainageThis nanofiber can utilize crop straw through an FeCl3-mediated deep eutectic solvent biorefinery and lignin-containing cellulose nanofibers flocculant fabrication followed by P-fertilizer production.[264]
Cellulose and carboxy-methyl cellulose nanofibersSlow-release fertilization Urea-loaded hydrogel applied via nanofibers enhanced seed germination and plant growth through effective and sustainable transport of fertilizer and water. [265]
Cellulose nanofiber with anthocyanins and carbon nanodotsApplications in food packaging NFs extended the shelf life of packaged perishable food. [266]
Poly-lactic acid nanofibersActive food packagingThis NF has strong antifungal activity that suppressed the proliferation of microbes in the preserved grapes and improved their quality. [260]
Citrus insoluble nanofiberProducing fat replacersA composite NF gel showed potential as a fat replacer and for inhibiting lipid digestion.[264]
Green nanofiberDelivery of active foodsCurcumin-loaded starch-based fast-dissolving NF showed promise in the pharmaceutical and food fields.[261]
Chitosan-based nanofibersDelivery of drugsCellulose and chitosan derivative-based NFs showed promise as biocompatible drug delivery systems.[267]
Starch-based nanofibersMonitoring of food freshnessNFs can reflect food freshness as a degradable, non-toxic, and smart food label with pH-sensitive nanofiber mats. [259]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Prokisch, J.; Törős, G.; Nguyen, D.H.H.; Neji, C.; Ferroudj, A.; Sári, D.; Muthu, A.; Brevik, E.C.; El-Ramady, H. Nano-Food Farming: Toward Sustainable Applications of Proteins, Mushrooms, Nano-Nutrients, and Nanofibers. Agronomy 2024, 14, 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030606

AMA Style

Prokisch J, Törős G, Nguyen DHH, Neji C, Ferroudj A, Sári D, Muthu A, Brevik EC, El-Ramady H. Nano-Food Farming: Toward Sustainable Applications of Proteins, Mushrooms, Nano-Nutrients, and Nanofibers. Agronomy. 2024; 14(3):606. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030606

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prokisch, József, Greta Törős, Duyen H. H. Nguyen, Chaima Neji, Aya Ferroudj, Daniella Sári, Arjun Muthu, Eric C. Brevik, and Hassan El-Ramady. 2024. "Nano-Food Farming: Toward Sustainable Applications of Proteins, Mushrooms, Nano-Nutrients, and Nanofibers" Agronomy 14, no. 3: 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030606

APA Style

Prokisch, J., Törős, G., Nguyen, D. H. H., Neji, C., Ferroudj, A., Sári, D., Muthu, A., Brevik, E. C., & El-Ramady, H. (2024). Nano-Food Farming: Toward Sustainable Applications of Proteins, Mushrooms, Nano-Nutrients, and Nanofibers. Agronomy, 14(3), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14030606

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop