Next Article in Journal
Effects of Different Proportions of Organic Fertilizer in Place of Chemical Fertilizer on Microbial Diversity and Community Structure of Pineapple Rhizosphere Soil
Previous Article in Journal
Metabolomic and Transcriptomic Insights into Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in ‘Ziyan’ Tea Plants under Varied Photoperiod and Temperature Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Research Status and Prospects on the Construction Methods of Temperature and Humidity Environmental Models in Arbor Tree Cuttage

by
Xu Wang
1,†,
Lixing Liu
1,†,
Jinyan Xie
1,
Xiaosa Wang
1,
Haoyuan Gu
1,
Jianping Li
1,2,
Hongjie Liu
1,2,
Pengfei Wang
1,2 and
Xin Yang
1,2,*
1
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China
2
Hebei Province Smart Agriculture Equipment Technology Innovation Center, Baoding 071001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors have contributed equally to this work.
Agronomy 2024, 14(1), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010058
Submission received: 11 December 2023 / Revised: 18 December 2023 / Accepted: 23 December 2023 / Published: 25 December 2023

Abstract

:
The environmental temperature and humidity are crucial factors for the normal growth and development of arbor tree cuttings by altering their hormone levels and influencing their physiological activities. Developing a temperature and humidity environmental model for arbor tree cuttings serves as a key technique to improve the adjustment performance of environmental parameters in facility agriculture systems and enhance the rooting rate of cuttings. This paper provides a comprehensive summary of current research on the inherent characteristics of cuttings and the factors influencing environmental temperature and humidity. It explores the mechanisms of interaction between the inherent characteristics of cuttings and the factors influencing environmental temperature and humidity. This paper investigates the interactive relationships among the factors affecting environmental temperature and humidity. It analyzes methods to improve the efficiency of constructing temperature and humidity environmental models for arbor tree cuttings. To enhance the transferability of the environmental model, the necessary physiological activities under the influence of plant hormones are generalized as common physiological traits in the growth and development of cuttings. In addition, this paper explores the factors influencing the air and substrate temperature and the humidity in facility agriculture systems as well as two types of facilities for controlling environmental temperature and humidity. Furthermore, it reviews the research progress in environmental models from both mechanistic and data-driven perspectives. This paper provides a comparative analysis of the characteristics associated with these two model categories. Building upon this, the paper summarizes and discusses methods employed in constructing temperature and humidity environmental models for arbor tree cuttings. In addition, it also anticipates the application of deep learning techniques in the construction of temperature and humidity environmental models for arbor cuttings, including utilizing machine vision technology to monitor their growth status. Finally, it proposes suggestions for building physiological models of fruit tree-like arbor cuttings at different growth stages. To enhance the transferability of environmental models, the integration of physiological models of cuttings, environmental models, and control system performance are suggested to create an environmental identification model. This paper aims to achieve control of the common physiological activities of cuttings.

1. Introduction

Cuttage is a technique in plant in vitro organ regeneration. After cuttings adapt to the temperature and humidity environment, their tissue cells undergo dedifferentiation into totipotent cells. These totipotent cells then re-differentiate to form the root primordium, which develops into adventitious roots, ultimately growing into new plants [1,2]. Cutting seedling cultivation boasts the advantages of a short cycle and the preservation of excellent maternal traits. It can provide outstanding germplasm for molecular-assisted breeding. This technology plays a crucial role in the exploration of genes determining essential genetic traits and the enhancement of breeding efficiency [3,4]. Before the cuttage seedlings of arbor trees are industrialized or cuttage seedling trials for new arbor varieties are conducted, the environmental temperature and humidity conditions suitable for the cuttings can only be obtained after prolonged monitoring and recording. Researchers subsequently based the research on the growth status of the cuttings and combined the production experience to summarize the environmental parameters needed for this cutting type. This process serves as the basis for setting parameters in the environmental control system. It is time-consuming and involves numerous influencing factors, and it is leading to a certain degree of randomness and subjectivity in the construction of the environmental model. To improve the efficiency of constructing environmental models for arbor tree cuttings, it is necessary to summarize the physiological commonalities exhibited by the inherent characteristics during the rooting process of cuttings as well as the mechanisms of interaction among the factors influencing environmental temperature and humidity. This helps to enhance the transferability of the environmental model, enabling it to adapt to the process of new varieties and consequently achieve efficient production and research.
The inherent characteristics of cuttings are composed of both their external traits and internal physiological activities since cuttings come from the mother tree. The quality and type of the mother tree directly impact the physicochemical properties of the cuttings [5]. The location of the cutting slips significantly influences the survival rate and the nursey emergence rate of the cuttings [6]. The length of cuttings determines the growth effectiveness of their adventitious roots [7]. Additionally, the number of leaves on the cutting branches is one of the factors influencing root growth [8]. The tissue cells of cuttings undergo necessary physiological activities under the influence of hormones to complete their own growth and development, including photosynthesis, transpiration, and respiration. These cellular activities can be considered as physiological commonalities during the rooting process of cuttings. Therefore, the proportion of plant hormones in cuttings is a key factor influencing the rooting rate, and the content of plant hormones is closely related to the environment in which cuttings are planted.
There are numerous factors influencing the rooting rate in cuttage circumstances, but temperature and humidity directly impact the synthesis, distribution, and transportation of hormones in cutting cells, thereby indirectly altering the growth status of cuttings [9,10]. Therefore, facility agriculture systems with precise environmental temperature and humidity control capabilities are more conducive to experimental research on environmental parameters for arbor tree cuttings. Facility agriculture systems, including plant factories, greenhouses, artificial climate chambers, etc., are comprehensive projects that integrate control theory, meteorology, botany, and other disciplines [11]. Within these agriculture systems, artificial climates can be created to address the intricate environmental requirements for plant growth. Both domestically and internationally, scholars have conducted extensive research on facility agriculture systems, yielding enriched achievements [12]. As early as the 1960s, European scholars initiated research on the production and environmental monitoring techniques of facility agriculture systems [13]. The control methods gradually evolved into multi-factor collaborative control [14], with hardware transitioning from single-chip microcontroller control [15] to IoT-based control [16]. The current advancements in artificial intelligence technology [17] have propelled the environmental monitoring technology of facility agriculture systems into a new phase of rapid advancement [18].
By employing artificial intelligence technology to construct temperature and humidity environmental models for the rooting process of arbor tree cuttings, researchers can monitor factors influencing environmental temperature and humidity, which allows them to gather representative data for training the model. The facility agriculture system is categorized into two areas based on covering materials involved in the internal environment and the external environment. Furthermore, based on the presence or absence of a substrate, the internal environment is subdivided into the substrate environment and the air environment. Therefore, this paper begins with providing an overview of the inherent characteristics of arbor tree cuttings. It then reviews the factors influencing the internal environment’s temperature and humidity in facility agriculture systems, respectively. Subsequently, it outlines temperature and humidity control facilities in facility agriculture systems and methods for building environmental models. Finally, the paper concludes with a summary and outlook on the methods of building temperature and humidity models for cuttings, providing additional recommendations for building models of fruit trees. The method for constructing the cuttings’ temperature and humidity environmental model is illustrated in Figure 1.

2. The Characteristics of Arbor Plant Cuttings

2.1. External Characteristics of Cuttings

The external characteristics of cuttings are mainly manifested in the external form and structure. Based on the degree of lignification, cuttings can be divided into shoots [19] and hard wood [20,21]. The number of buds on the cuttings of the two types is different, and the buds of shoots are generally more than that of hard wood. Before cuttings, it is required to ensure that the top opening is flush and the bottom opening is cut at 45°. During cuttings, appropriate depth is needed for operation, and the cutting substrate should be gently compressed after cuttings so as to ensure that as many tissue cells contact the substrate as possible and increase the number of callus cells that can be generated [22]. The rooting process of apple rootstock shoots is an example for illustration, as shown in Figure 2. Eight typical tree cuttings are selected to describe the cutting parameters, as shown in Table 1.
As indicated in Figure 2, it can be seen that the tissue cells of the apple rootstock cutting slips underwent dedifferentiation to produce a callus, at which time the cells in the callus were totipotent, and after redifferentiation into root primordia, adventitious roots were eventually produced, after which the number and length of the adventitious roots increased continuously [23].
Table 1. Parameters of 8 kinds of arbor plants cuttings.
Table 1. Parameters of 8 kinds of arbor plants cuttings.
Cuttings TypeNotch Angle (°)Length (cm)The Number of Buds (Piece)The Number of Leaves (Piece)Depth of Insertion into Substrate (cm)Rooting Rate (%)Related Research
Salix Mongolica451003~5266.797.92Zha et al. [6]
Fir45151Retain the Needle Leaves Above 2 cm at the Lower End285.83Chen et al. [7]
Toona Ciliata4510 22~394.44Chen et al. [5]
Birchleaved Pear4510~1513~53.33~570Wang et al. [24]
Cherry Rootstock (Gisela)4510~12 1~33.33~485Ren et al. [25]
Peach Rootstock (GF677)4510~152~33~43~483Tewfik [26]
Apple Rootstock (Laoshannaise)4515~203~43~41.5~290Xiao [27]
Mountain Apricot458~10 2~3 66.7Dai et al. [28]
The survival of cuttings is reflected by the characteristics of the roots. The more developed the roots are, the better the cutting effect is. Yoon et al. studied the growth and development of salix mongolica cuttings and took the maximum root length of cuttings as the standard for evaluating the rooting effect [29]. Dawa et al. studied the root generation process of plant cuttings and reflected the cutting effect with the average root length of the cuttings [30]. Kalanzi et al. studied the effect of the segment cutting position on the rooting of cuttings and showed the significance of the treatment by analyzing the amount of rooting [31]. The root weight and the number of root segments are positively correlated with the growth rate of cuttings [32]. When studying the cutting effect of each index, the mean values of the affiliation function values of the different determinants under each treatment were taken as the evaluation standard. The larger the value of the affiliation function is, the more effective the cuttings are. The index measurement formula is as follows:
R ( X j ) = ( X j X min ) / ( X max X min )
Xj—A processed indicator value;
Xmax—Index maximum;
Xmin—Index minimum.
It can be calculated from Table 1 that the average rooting rates of non-fruit trees and fruit trees are 92.73% and 78.94%, respectively, which shows that the rooting of fruit trees is difficult. The rooting rate of cuttings is closely related to the intensity of their own physiological activities [33].

2.2. Physiological Activities of Cuttings

Respiration, photosynthesis, and transpiration are the main physiological activities during tree cuttings, and the proper performance of the three kinds of physiological activities can effectively ensure the final cutting effect [34]. Cutting respiration is a process in which organic matter releases energy by oxidative decomposition under the action of a series of enzymes and hormones [35]. When the cells of the cuttings breathe aerobically, the accumulated organic matter is completely oxidized into CO2 and H2O [36]. Photosynthesis of cuttings is a biochemical process in which chlorophyll is irradiated by visible light [37]. CO2 and H2O are converted into organic matter through a light reaction, then O2 is released [38]. These organic substances provide carbon sources for tree cuttings and roots, which are used for the growth, cell division, and tissue expansion of cuttings [39]. Transpiration is the main driving force of water circulation in cuttings [40], which enables cuttings to absorb water from the substrate and transport it to the tissues [41]. At the same time, three kinds of physiological activities will indirectly affect the temperature and humidity of the internal environment through the media of water and energy [42], as shown in Figure 3.
The characteristics of arbor plant cuttings include external characteristics and internal physiological activities. The external characteristics of cuttings will determine the strength of their physiological activity. In the cutting process of plants, since the cuttings have not yet formed roots and cannot effectively absorb water in the substrate, only one or two young leaves or one or two buds are retained to weaken the transpiration and respiration of the cuttings and maintain photosynthesis so as to ensure the balance of the physiological activities of the cuttings [43]. Physiological activities of cuttings are a series of chemical and physical changes carried out by tissue cells with the participation of plant hormones [44,45], which belongs to the common growth characteristics of cuttings. Therefore, it is necessary to summarize the functions of plant hormones in cuttings and the mechanism of environmental factors’ influence on plant hormones.

3. Characteristics of Plant Hormones in Cuttings

3.1. Types of Plant Hormones in Cuttings

Plant hormones play a crucial regulatory role in the growth and development of cuttings. They possess the ability to regulate cell division, elongation, and differentiation in cuttings, influencing the overall growth and development process [46,47]. During the rooting process of cuttings, prominent endogenous hormones that exert significant influence on them include auxins, abscisic acids, and cytokinins [48,49]. These plant hormones are primarily produced in the cambium layer, located between the phloem and xylem of the cutting [50]. In the cambium layer of the cutting, plant hormones generated during the active cell division process facilitate the cuttings’ rooting and growth [51].
The growth and development stage of cuttings is an intrinsic factor influencing the production of endogenous plant hormones [52,53]. Softwood cuttings and hardwood cuttings are different morphologies of cuttings at varying growth stages [54,55]. Compared with hardwood cuttings, softwood cuttings exhibit higher levels of auxins and cytokinins and lower levels of abscisic acid [56,57]. To enhance the rooting rate of cuttings, researchers apply exogenous hormones to cuttings before the cuttage [58,59,60]. Exogenous plant hormones can regulate the levels of endogenous plant hormones. The exogenous hormones commonly used for cuttings include indoleacetic acid (IAA), naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and indolebutyric acid (IBA). They belong to the auxin class of hormones, enabling the plant to promote the elongation and division of cutting cells [61,62]. The exogenous plant hormone 6-Benzylaminopurine (6-BA) is a synthetically produced cytokinin that can promote the differentiation and growth of cuttings. As a result, it facilitates the generation of adventitious roots [63,64]. Shi et al. treated linden cuttings with the exogenous hormone IBA, promoting the content of the endogenous hormone IAA to increase during the rooting induction period. Therefore, it facilitates a shift in the cuttings toward the physiological state favorable for rooting [65]. Wang et al. treated the cuttings of Fraxinus chinensis with 200 mg/L IBA. They found that, during the rooting process, the treated group exhibited a higher rate of increase in IAA content compared to the control group, thus demonstrating the regulatory effect of IBA on endogenous hormones [66]. Exogenous growth hormones significantly influence the nutrients, intracellular enzymes, chlorophyll, free amino acids, and other substances in the cuttings [67,68]. Zhu et al. [69] researched the cuttage of linden, treating the cuttings with IBA and water, respectively. The results indicated that the rooting rate of cuttings treated with IBA (75%) was significantly higher than those treated with water. Xu et al. [70] investigated the cuttage of Parthenocissus quinquefolia and found that the highest rooting rate was observed in those treated with 300 mol/L indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Additionally, Li et al. [71] conducted a cuttage study on European spruce, discovering that different hormone types had varying effects on the rooting rate of cuttings, and higher concentrations of hormones were found to hinder rooting. Meanwhile, they found that the combined use of growth hormones resulted in better rooting effects.

3.2. Influence of Temperature and Humidity on Plant Hormone Functions

The temperature and humidity of the environment are external factors influencing the production and transport of plant hormones [72,73]. Within a certain range, an increase in temperature promotes the synthesis and transport of auxins in the cutting [74]. Auxins, in turn, stimulate the respiration of cutting cells, enhance cellular metabolic capacity, and provide energy and nutrients for the rooting of cuttings [75]. Furthermore, by adjusting the opening of stomata, auxins can influence gas exchange and water transpiration in the cuttings, thereby modulating the respiration and transpiration processes of cuttings [76]. Excessively high or low temperatures can lead to increased abscisic acid content within the cuttings, which sometimes may accelerate leaf abscission [77]. The number of leaves directly affects the intensity of photosynthesis and respiration of the cuttings [78,79]. Cytokinins promote cell division and tissue differentiation [80]. Within a certain temperature range, an increase in temperatures contributes to the synthesis of cytokinins [81]. Cytokinins affect the opening of stomata, thereby influencing transpiration efficiency. The dedifferentiation of the cutting cells is primarily controlled by auxins and cytokinins. When the auxin content exceeds that of cytokinins, it induces the dedifferentiation of tissue cells and the formation of root primordia [82].
Humidity also affects the synthesis and distribution of hormones within cuttings. A suitable humidity level helps maintain the water balance inside and outside the cuttings, thus preserving normal cell function and metabolic activity [83]. Conversely, high humidity may inhibit the formation of abscisic acids and cytokinins. In addition, both excessively high and low humidity can interfere with the distribution and transport of auxins [84]. The main mechanism through which humidity influences the levels of plant hormones is through the regulation of hormone synthesis and transport via the control of the plant stomatal opening and closing [85]. Excessive or insufficient air humidity can lead to stomatal closure, hindering the entry of carbon dioxide and the release of water vapor, thereby reducing photosynthetic efficiency [86]. Additionally, within a certain humidity range, an increase in humidity enhances the respiratory activity of plants [87]. However, if humidity is excessively high, it may lead to stomatal closure, hindering the entry of oxygen into the plant and thereby suppressing the respiratory activity [88]. Meanwhile, excessive humidity can also result in an excess of water within the plant, disturbing cellular metabolic processes and further affecting respiration [89]. The main way humidity influences transpiration is by affecting the opening and closing of stomata as well as vapor pressure differentials [90]. Excessive high atmospheric humidity reduces the vapor pressure differential between the inside and outside of the leaves, making it difficult for water vapor in the substomatal cavity to diffuse, consequently weakening transpiration [91].
The rooting process of cuttings involves the coordinated action of various plant hormones. Temperature and humidity affect the synthesis, transportation, and stability of plant hormones. Therefore, employing facility agriculture systems to maintain an appropriate temperature and humidity range is of great importance for promoting the rootage of cuttings and increasing survival rates.

4. Environmental Requirements for Cuttings

In a facility agriculture system, the temperature and humidity of the substrate and air can both influence hormones in cutting cells, which in turn affects the physiological activities of cuttings [92]. The environment required by cuttings is shown in Figure 4.
According to the presence or absence of substrates in the environment where the cuttings are planted, facility agriculture systems are divided into substrate environment-based and air environment-based systems. Due to the active physiological activities of plant cells at high ambient temperatures, nutrients will be transported to the high ambient temperature part in a concentrated manner, so the ambient temperature of the substrate should be higher than that of the air environment when cutting [93]. In this way, the cells at the cutting incision will obtain more nutrients, which is conducive to the formation of a callus. If the ambient air temperature is higher than the substrate ambient temperature, the buds and leaves of the cuttings will preferentially consume nutrients for respiration, resulting in a decrease in the rooting rate of the cuttings [94]. Table 2 shows the environmental parameters of apple rootstock shoot cuttings, and the temperature of the substrate is higher than that of the air. The substrate is composed of vermiculite.
At the time of cutting, the relative humidity of the air and the moisture of the substrate are required to be 80–90% and 50–60%, respectively [95], which can form a film of water on the cutting surface [96]. Higher air humidity can reduce the evaporation of substrate water so that the substrate can maintain the appropriate humidity to reduce the water loss from the cutting cells to avoid the cuttings’ dehydration and an injury to seedlings [97]. In addition, substrate characteristics are also important factors affecting the rooting rate of arbor cuttings [98]. A substrate is used to provide growth support and nutrient supply for plant cuttings and seedlings. Therefore, when selecting and managing substrates, factors such as the demand of cuttings and environmental conditions should be considered [99]. Wang et al. took maple birch as the research object and verified the effect of the substrate type on cuttings through experiments [100]. Zhang viewed the substrate composition as the main factor affecting cutting propagation and proved that the substrate composition was also an important factor significantly affecting cuttings [101].
It can be seen from Figure 3 that there is a coupling relationship between temperature and humidity in the air environment and the substrate environment [102]. To study the relationship between the two, it is necessary to not only study the separate action mechanism of the influencing factors of air temperature and humidity and substrate temperature but also identify the interaction mode between the two. Therefore, it is of great significance to summarize the factors affecting the air environment, substrate environment temperature, and humidity to improve the environmental control effect of cuttings.

4.1. Factors Affecting the Ambient Temperature of Facility Agricultural Systems

The temperature in facility agriculture systems was mainly determined by heat conduction, heat convection, and heat radiation [103,104]. Conduction can transfer heat through direct collisions between molecules as well as the transfer of energy. Meanwhile, the rate of conduction is affected by the thermal conductivity, heat capacity, temperature difference, and distance between objects [105]. Convection is the process by which heat is transferred through the flow of a gas or liquid, where a fluid that expands by heat or shrinks by cold transfers heat from one area to another [106]. The rate of convective heat transfer depends on the nature of the fluid, the velocity of the flow, the temperature difference, and the shape and structure of the object surface [107]. Radiation is the process of transferring heat through electromagnetic waves. The rate of thermal radiation depends on the temperature of the object, the emissivity of the surface, and the distance between the objects [108]. Heat transfer in the internal environment of facility agriculture systems is usually a combination of the above three methods [109].

4.1.1. Factors Affecting Air Ambient Temperature

In the air environment of a facility agriculture system, the heat transfer medium is mainly gas molecules and water vapor, whose content and density determine the heat transfer effect. The ambient temperature of the air mainly heats the air near the heat source by means of heat radiation and heat conduction. The heated air then transfers heat to the cooler part in the form of heat convection. Therefore, flow conditions will affect the change in heat transfer path and the uniformity of heat distribution [110].
For the case where the heat transfer medium is gas, the flow can be divided into natural convection and forced convection. Natural convection is caused by the difference in gas density under the action of gravity in the absence of external driving forces [111,112]. Natural convection in the process of heat transfer in air environment can form convective circulation [113]. When the gas is heated and the temperature difference is generated, the surrounding air density changes. The gas in the area with lower density will rise, while the gas in the area with higher density will sink, thus forming convective circulation [114]. Forced convection is generated by an external driving force [115], including a mechanical device (such as a fan) or other form of external force, which often produces a stronger convection effect and a higher heat transfer rate than natural convection [116]. In the air environment, convection heat transfer is usually faster than the conduction heat transfer rate, and the flowing medium can form a new contact surface of cold and hot media through movement, thus improving the heat transfer effect [117].
The air environment of the facility agricultural system can be heated by means of sunlight, hot blast stove heating, a fin radiator, etc., and it can be cooled by means of a water curtain, a negative pressure fan, and the location of tuyere and ventilation forms together with air conditioning [118,119] (Figure 5).

4.1.2. Factors Affecting Substrate Ambient Temperature

The heat transfer of the substrate is mainly through heat conduction and heat radiation. Light intensity has a certain influence on the temperature of the substrate [120] because the absorption and reflection of light by the substrate will cause itself to be heated [121]. The color of the substrate affects the effect of heat radiation energy transfer because the color of different types of substrates has a different ability to absorb and release heat. For example, the dark substrate absorbs more heat more easily, while the light substrate has a strong reflection ability and does not easily rise in temperature through thermal radiation [122], as shown in Figure 6. The physical properties of heat transfer in the substrate have different influences on the heat transfer, including thermal conductivity, density, heat capacity, and thermal diffusivity [123,124]. The parameters of heat transfer characteristics of the substrate commonly used in plant cuttings are shown in Table 3. There is water between the pores of the substrate, and the temperature of water will affect the heat transfer of the substrate; the water retention of the substrate is also a factor affecting the heat transfer characteristics of the substrate [125,126]. Therefore, the temperature of the substrate was affected by irrigation frequency, water quantity, and water temperature. Since irrigation also directly changes substrate humidity, irrigation methods are described in the section on substrate humidity control methods.
As shown in Figure 7, the temperature in the substrate environment can be controlled by means of buried pipes, geothermal wires, and thermostatic master disc water baths. The buried pipe sends water into the pipe to change the temperature of the substrate via heat conduction [130], and the geothermal wire uses the resistance wire to heat the substrate [131]. The water bath temperature control master designed by Mi is used for cutting and breeding apple rootstock, which can control the temperature of the substrate by controlling the circulation of water and the heat exchange with the substrate [132].

4.2. Factors Affecting Environmental Humidity in Facility Agricultural Systems

4.2.1. Factors Affecting the Humidity of the Air Environment

There is a close relationship between humidity and temperature in the air environment. As shown in Figure 8, they jointly determine the moisture content in the air [133]. The increase in temperature causes the saturated water vapor pressure in the air to increase so that the air can hold more water [134]. The moisture contained in the air is generally called relative humidity, which is expressed as a percentage of the ratio between the actual water vapor pressure and the saturated water vapor pressure. The increase in temperature will make the saturated water vapor pressure in the air rise faster than the actual water vapor pressure, resulting in the decrease in relative humidity [135]. Under specific humidity conditions, the corresponding temperature when the water vapor in the air reaches saturation is called the dew point temperature [136]. When air is cooled to the dew point temperature, condensation occurs, resulting in a decrease in relative humidity [137,138]. The dew point temperature is related to relative humidity and temperature, and with the increase in relative humidity or the decrease in temperature, the dew point temperature will decrease [139]. Therefore, changes in temperature affect the relative humidity and dew point temperature, thereby changing the moisture content in the air [140].
The water vapor condensation usually starts with a condensation nucleus. A condensation nucleus in facility agriculture systems includes tiny solid or liquid particles, and when saturated vapor pressure and temperature in the air remain constant, the evaporation of a condensation nucleus reaches dynamic equilibrium [141]. In addition, condensation is also affected by air flow, which affects water vapor condensation mainly through auxiliary mass transfer to increase the contact opportunity and remove the saturated layer [142]. The diffusion between water vapor and air is accelerated during air flow, which helps to bring water vapor molecules around the condensation nucleus. Water vapor condenses into small droplets on the condensation nucleus to form a saturated layer, which prevents new water vapor from condensing. The moving air removes the saturated layer around the condensed water, enabling the condensation to occur. However, too strong or too fast of an air flow may cause water vapor to disperse and dilute, thus slowing the condensation [143].
The water vapor in the air environment can be supplemented by the atomizing device, and the spray can be divided into different forms according to the size of the droplets. It mainly includes aerosol spray, mist spray, spray drift, and drift spray [144,145]. The droplets formed by an atomizing spray are subtler and can stay suspended in the air for a long time. The droplets formed by a mist spray are very small, like tiny water droplets suspended in the air. The droplets form large droplets that fall quickly to the ground. The droplets formed by a drift spray are larger and need to be influenced by wind to travel long distances [146]. The parameters of different spray forms are shown in Table 4.
To maintain the humidity of cuttings in the air environment, it is necessary to not only choose the appropriate atomization equipment but also know about the structure of the cuttings’ surface because the surface structure of cuttings has a significant influence on the dynamic behavior of droplet wall impact [147]. The topological morphology of the cuttings’ surface determines its wetting characteristics [148], which are usually divided into hydrophobic, superhydrophobic, hydrophilic, and superhydrophilic characteristics, and the degree of infiltration directly determines the amount of droplets on the cuttings’ surface. The topological morphology of cuttings includes surface pores [149] and irregular attachments (hairs, spines, etc.) [150] (Figure 9 and Figure 10).
γ SV γ SL = γ LV cos θ cos θ w = r cos θ cos θ c = f s cos θ s + f V + cos θ V
In the Equation (2), r represents the ratio between the apparent solid contact area and the intrinsic solid contact area, r ≥ 1, f s + f v = 1.
The dynamic morphological changes of a single droplet impacting a solid wall can be divided into six categories [153], as shown in Figure 11.
In the critical stage of the impact process, forced energy and mass are conserved [154]. Roisman et al. found that when a single droplet has a retreat after impact and diffusion, the process is determined by the interaction between the free edge and the internal liquid layer and the force exerted by the wall on the edge [155]. Kim and Chun supplemented the energy balance formula [156] and approximated the shape of the water drop as a cylinder, which showed that it could describe the spreading and droplet retreat behavior well. Xu et al. used the spring-mass-damping equation to describe the recoil stage process and determined its coefficient semi-empirically with actual physical parameters [157]. Okumura demonstrated by scale that a droplet can behave as a spring mass system under the limit of small deformation [158]. The modeling of the rebound and crushing stage mostly adopts the traditional energy balance principle [159]. The researchers used experimental fitting to produce a probabilistic method for predicting the adhesion, rebound, and splash [160]. The criterion for a rebound was first proposed by Mao et al. to determine whether the residual energy after impact could cause a droplet to rebound, and they predicted the rebound behavior of a droplet impacting a horizontal surface from directly above through a series of energy balances [161]. Dorr et al. extended this model by adding multi-angle impact scenarios [162] and predicted the occurrence of a rebound by calculating the “Excess Rebound Energy” (EERE), which occurs when EERE > 0. In fragmentation stage modeling, Mundo et al. proposed the basis for determining whether the droplet’s kinetic energy can overcome the capillary effect and lead to droplet fragmentation [163], as shown in Equation (3).
K = Oh ( Re ) 1.25 = We 0.5 Re 0.25 > K crit
The K describes the factors related to droplet properties, and Kcrit characterizes the surface characteristics of the impact wall, including roughness and wettability. When K > Kcrit, crushing occurs; when K < Kcrit is applied, the droplet will adhere or rebound, and the specific behavior of the droplet can be further identified by combining the residual energy formula in the Dorr model.
Therefore, in order to meet the requirements of water film formation on the cuttings’ surface, it is necessary to clarify the characteristics of the cuttings as the impacting surface of droplets. The wetness of the cuttings’ surface is not only related to the moisture content in the air environment but also the amount of water absorbed via transpiration from the substrate.

4.2.2. Factors Affecting the Ambient Humidity of the Substrate

The substrate consists of one or more granular materials, belonging to a porous medium. Relative humidity is an important factor affecting the moisture of the substrate [164]. When the relative humidity of the air environment is high, the substrate more easily absorbs the moisture in the air, resulting in an increase in its own humidity [165]. When the relative humidity is low, the water in the substrate more easily evaporates [166,167]. The water retention capacity of the substrate was determined by the type of substrate and the drainage capacity, while different types of substrates had different water retention capacities. The composition of the substrate determines the overall pore structure and affects its ability to adsorb and release water, which is reflected in the strength of the substrate’s drainage capacity [168]. Higher temperatures increase the rate of evaporation of water in the substrate, resulting in lower substrate humidity [169,170]. The facility agriculture system can increase the air flow rate at the surface of the substrate and accelerate water evaporation through the capillary transport up the pores, thus changing the substrate humidity [171]. The irrigation frequency and single irrigation amount directly affect the humidity of the substrate [172,173] (Table 5).
The methods of substrate humidification in the facility agriculture system include surface drip irrigation, insert drip irrigation, and spraying [189,190,191], as shown in Figure 12. Irrigation methods will lead to different volumes of substrate-wetted bodies [192], as shown in Figure 13.

5. Construction Methods of Environmental Model in Facility Agriculture Systems

The environmental model of a facility agriculture system mainly includes the mechanism model and data-driven model [193]. The mechanism model is a dynamic model based on the principles of energy conservation and mass conservation [194]. The data model, also known as the black box model, is based on modern computational theory and builds a process model according to the characteristic information provided by the data.

5.1. Environmental Mechanism Model of Facility Agriculture Systems

Businger [195] divided the interior of the greenhouse into four layers based on the balance between energy and mass, and his research method became the basis for the mechanism modeling of plant factories. Pasgianos [196] used the computational fluid dynamic (CFD) theory and method to analyze and study the air exchange rate of natural light-type plant factories by taking the temperature difference, outdoor wind speed, and skylight opening angle as parameters. Boulard and Wang used CFD to study climate distribution and crop transpiration heterogeneity inside the greenhouse and studied the mechanism changes of temperature and humidity from the perspectives of plant physiology and thermodynamics [197]. Liu used computational fluid dynamics to calculate the flow field as well as temperature field and studied an adjoint method to achieve optimal ventilation design in a closed environment [198]. Xu [199] proposed a CFD-based cooling environment optimization design method for a greenhouse wet curtain–fan system, which improved the environmental performance of greenhouse cooling in summer. Saberian developed a computational fluid dynamic model of a full-scale gabled greenhouse covered with translucent materials to simulate the effect of the solar dynamic heat load on the greenhouse microclimate so as to predict microclimate dynamics in 2017 and 2018 [200]. The microclimate model constructed by Singh et al. describes the transfer process of energy and matter, and this model can predict the temperature of air, crops, and cultivation substrates under natural ventilation conditions [201]. Li built a computational fluid dynamic model for greenhouse buildings to achieve the multi-objective and high-efficiency optimization of greenhouse environmental factors, in which the thermal environment component of the greenhouse was the main research object [202]. Boulard et al. established a fluid dynamic model to predict the distribution of temperature and water vapor in the glass greenhouse, optimize the micrometeorological conditions in the greenhouse, and provide a theoretical basis for energy saving [203]. Zhang et al. used a CFD numerical simulation to analyze the 20 °C isosurface of the rear wall of the greenhouse for heat storage and determined that the reasonable length of the hot air storage duct is 20 m [204]. Above such models can calculate the distribution of temperature and humidity (spatial characteristics) in greenhouses (Table 6 and Figure 14).

5.2. Environmental Data-Driven Model of Facility Agriculture Systems

Data-driven modeling can be divided into the statistical regression method and shallow neural network method [205,206]. Yu et al. proposed a temperature prediction model based on the least squares support vector machine (LSSVM). Improved particle swarm optimization (IPSO) was adopted to optimize the parameters of the LSSVM model, and the short-term prediction effect of the future was better [207]. Since the greenhouse system has the characteristics of slow time-varying and the time-series data of the greenhouse environment are characterized by specific trends and cycles, the greenhouse time-series modeling can be used to study the specific law of data change. Ren et al. designed and developed a greenhouse environment monitoring and temperature prediction system based on the differential time-series model by combining the Internet of Things, cloud services, and wechat platform [208]. Du et al. proposed a nonlinear autoregressive dynamic neural network model for solar greenhouse temperature predictions [209]. Jung et al. built an artificial neural network, nonlinear autoregressive model, and long short-term memory model (LSTM) to predict air temperature and humidity [210]. Guillen-Navarro MA et al. used LSTM and 4-month temperature data to predict in advance whether there would be an extremely low temperature in the greenhouse, and the prediction error was less than 0.8 °C [211]. Hu et al. proposed a two-dimensional substrate input network based on 1D CNN-GRU structural characteristics and time-step length for temperature prediction, providing an important basis for accurate and efficient temperature control of facility agriculture systems [212]. In the study of short-term time series under nonlinear and non-stationary scenarios, some scholars proposed to combine the autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA) [213,214], genetic algorithm (GA), and support vector regression (SVR) [215], emphasizing the capture of different model features within the data to improve the prediction performance of a single model so as to obtain temperature prediction values more in line with the actual situation and improve the accuracy and effectiveness of temperature prediction. Zou constructed a convex bidirectional extreme value learning machine (CB-ELM) to establish a solar greenhouse temperature and humidity prediction model, reducing potential economic losses [216]. In order to solve the hysteresis problem in solar greenhouse temperature regulation, Li proposed a solar greenhouse temperature prediction model based on a BP neural network [217].
The data-driven model trains a large number of high-quality data based on statistical laws, improves adaptively according to the data, and continuously optimizes its own parameters and structure so as to improves the prediction accuracy to cope with various complex and changeable environmental conditions. The data-driven model has advantages in dealing with nonlinear relationships and can accurately capture complex nonlinear dynamics in the environment of a facility agriculture system and mine hidden information and patterns in the data. However, current studies on temperature and humidity prediction of facility agricultural systems based on deep learning mostly focus on a single temporal network [218], unable to mine deep and effective information among the environmental data, and the maximum prediction time of the model is only 1 h. Further studies are needed to meet the needs for the accuracy, efficiency, and duration of the model [219] (Table 7 and Figure 15).
Two types of model pairs are shown in Table 8.

6. Discussion, Conclusions, and Prospects

6.1. Discussion

(1) The survival rate of cuttings is mainly determined by both inherent characteristics of the cuttings themselves and external temperature and humidity. The inherent characteristics of cuttings include their external appearance and the physiological activities within cuttings under the influence of hormones. As physiological commonalities in the growth and development of cuttings, environmental temperature and humidity influence cuttings’ physiological activities by affecting the production and distribution of hormones. At the same time, the physiological activities of cuttings also impact environmental temperature and humidity in the form of water and energy. The characteristics of cuttings’ roots serve as the evaluation criteria for the effectiveness of cuttage. However, depending solely on root characteristics as the standard for evaluating cuttage effectiveness is insufficient to demonstrate cuttings’ health conditions during their growth process. Therefore, it is necessary to supplement the evaluation criteria further. For example, before the rootage of cuttings, the dynamic changes in the physiological state of tissue cells can be incorporated as the process evaluation criteria.
(2) In facility agriculture systems, the physiological activities of cuttings are maintained in balance by controlling the internal temperature and humidity of the agriculture system. The internal environment in facility agriculture systems is categorized into air and substrate environments. The heat transfer in the internal environment is the combined effects of heat conduction, heat convection, and thermal radiation. The humidity in both the air and substrate environments is determined by the moisture content, including the transformation and movement between gaseous and liquid water. The factors influencing the temperature and humidity in the internal environment are intricate, with coupling relationships among them. Consequently, when researching the construction of temperature and humidity models for arbor tree cuttings in facility agriculture systems, it is essential to explore the influence weights of various factors on temperature and humidity. Decoupling methods can be adopted to clarify the influence weights of each factor, and those with significant influence weights should be selected as parameters for building the environmental model.
(3) The environmental model in facility agriculture systems comprises mechanistic models and data-driven models, and the main research objects are temperature and humidity. Both types of models have their strengths in predicting temperature and humidity. Mechanistic models, predominantly employing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) as a key research tool, can vividly depict the spatiotemporal distribution of temperature and humidity, along with the energy changes induced by the physiological activities of cuttings. Data-driven models can simultaneously handle high-dimensional data, leveraging its powerful computational capabilities to predict the trends in temperature and humidity rapidly. Considering the large volume of physiological model data of cuttings themselves, coupled with numerous factors in facility agriculture systems affecting temperature and humidity as well as the coupling effects among these factors, it is advantageous to integrate mechanistic models with data-driven models when constructing environmental models. Mechanistic models can be employed to screen impact factors, consequently reducing the data dimensions for data-driven models and enhancing their convergence speed.
(4) Both the environmental mechanistic models and data-driven models can be constructed in Matlab, which is expected to remain an essential tool for building these two types of models in the future. However, with the ongoing progress in deep learning, there will be a gradual improvement in the quality of collected feature data, and the quantity will also become substantial. Therefore, deep learning neural networks built in the Python language might offer more advantages in constructing environmental models. The purpose of constructing environmental models is to better observe the distribution of temperature and humidity within facility agriculture systems. This provides a basis for the dynamic adjustment of environmental parameters in the control system of the internal environment, enhancing the comfort of cuttings in facility agriculture systems, ultimately improving the rooting and survival rates of the cuttings.

6.2. Conclusions

Rationally controlling the temperature and humidity is the key to improving the rooting rate of arbor cuttings. The temperature and humidity environmental model can provide a basis for regulating temperature and humidity in the control system. Therefore, we summarized the relationship between the characteristics of arbor cuttings, plant hormones’ characteristics, and environmental temperature and humidity. We combined the ways of constructing environmental models for facility agriculture systems to conduct research on the construction methods of temperature and humidity environmental models in arbor tree cuttage. The main research contents are as follows.
(1) The external traits of arbor cuttings include the type, the location part, the length of cuttings, the number of leaves and buds on the cutting branches, and the characteristics of the roots. The internal physiological activities of cuttings include photosynthesis, transpiration, and respiration. The external traits of cuttings influence the intensity of their physiological activities, while the physiological activities mutually influence each other in the forms of water and energy with environmental temperature and humidity. The external traits and internal physiological activities collectively constitute the characteristics of cuttings. Therefore, when constructing a temperature and humidity environmental model for arbor tree cuttings, monitoring the inherent characteristics of cuttings can estimate their physiological activity intensity.
(2) Plant hormones regulate the growth and development of cuttings by influencing their inherent physiological activities. Plant hormones are categorized into endogenous hormones and exogenous hormones. The endogenous hormones significantly impacting cuttings primarily comprise auxins, abscisic acids, and cytokinins. On the other hand, exogenous hormones applied before cuttage mainly include indoleacetic acid (IAA), naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), indolebutyric acid (IBA), and 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA). All endogenous hormones and exogenous hormones can regulate the division, elongation, and differentiation of cutting cells. In addition, exogenous plant hormones can modulate the levels of endogenous plant hormones. In summary, the content of and changes in plant hormones in cuttings influence the effectiveness of their growth and development. Therefore, by controlling the levels of plant hormones in cuttings, it is possible to regulate the intensity of the cuttings’ inherent physiological activities during the rooting process.
(3) Environmental temperature and humidity are the primary external factors influencing the generation and transport of plant hormones. In facility agriculture systems, the environment is classified into substrate and air environments based on the presence or absence of a substrate. Both environments encompass temperature and humidity parameters. Specifically, factors influencing the temperature of the air environment include the density and flow state of gas molecules as well as water vapor. The temperature of the air environment can be adjusted by leveraging corresponding facilities based on the principles of natural convection and forced convection. Similarly, factors influencing the temperature of the substrate environment include the color, heat transfer characteristics, and water retention capacity of the substrate. The temperature of the substrate environment can be regulated by utilizing facilities such as buried pipes, geothermal wires, and thermostatic master discs based on the principles of heat conduction and thermal radiation. Furthermore, factors influencing the humidity of the air environment mainly include the temperature of the air environment, the air velocity, and the role of condensation nuclei. The moist state of the cutting’s epidermis is primarily associated with the humidity of the air environment and the characteristics of the epidermis. Moisture in the air environment is supplemented by atomizing devices. In addition, the humidity of the substrate environment is influenced by the characteristics of the substrate and the relative humidity of the air environment. Methods such as surface drip irrigation, inserted drip irrigation, and sprinkling can alter the volume of substrate-wetted bodies. Understanding the factors influencing environmental temperature and humidity as well as the mechanisms by which temperature and humidity affect the levels of plant hormones in cuttings is a method for regulating the intensity of physiological activities in cuttings.
(4) Environmental models are constructed from the factors affecting environmental temperature and humidity in facility agricultural systems. They can describe changes in temperature and humidity. According to different modeling methods, it can be divided into a mechanism model and data-driven model. The building principles of the mechanism models include the law of energy conservation, the law of momentum conservation, and the law of mass conservation. The data-driven models are mainly constructed based on statistical regression and neural network. When constructing the temperature and humidity environment model of cuttings in the facility agriculture system, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the characteristics of cuttings themselves and the factors affecting the environmental temperature and humidity of the facility agriculture system. By changing the environmental temperature and humidity, the production, transport, and distribution of plant hormones in the cuttings are affected so as to control the physiological activity intensity of cuttings and improve the adaptability of the environmental model. Combining the visual description characteristics of the mechanism model and the ability of data-driven model to process high-dimensional data, the temperature and humidity environment model of arbor cuttings can be effectively constructed. The choice of the model depends on the temperature and humidity requirements of cuttings, the available data, the environmental conditions, and the cost of obtaining effective data.

6.3. Prospect

(1) The key to constructing environmental models for cuttings lies in the effective collection of data. The growth and development process of cuttings exhibit characteristics such as diverse feature types, large data volumes, and slow, continuous changes. Therefore, machine vision technology can be employed to monitor the growth conditions of cuttings; image segmentation techniques can be adopted to extract the morphology and changes in roots, stems, leaves, and buds of cuttings; imaging devices can be utilized to monitor the temperature distribution and moisture level on the surface of cuttings, capturing the opening and closing of stomata; and multispectral technology can be leveraged to identify and analyze the internal features of cuttings, including changes in moisture content and hormone quantities. Through continuous image data, the physiological activities of cuttings can be indirectly observed and analyzed.
(2) As fruit trees often exhibit a lower rooting rate in cuttings, further research on their cutting techniques is needed within facility agriculture systems, including studying the inherent physiological characteristics of fruit tree cuttings and their specific requirements for environmental temperature and humidity. Given that cuttings have no roots when initially inserted into the substrate and the intensity of their physiological activities differs from that of rooted plants, it is essential to categorize the rooting process of cuttings into distinct growth stages when constructing physiological models. These stages include the rootless period, callus tissue formation period, and adventitious root formation period.
(3) When designing the temperature and humidity environmental model for arbor tree cuttings, it should adhere to the principle of maintaining the balance of the physiological activities of cuttings. Environmental parameters of temperature and humidity should experience dynamic changes to facilitate the synthesis, transport, and distribution of hormones, thus maintaining a reasonable ratio of plant hormones within the cuttings and meeting the physiological commonality requirements for the growth and development of cuttings. Additionally, other factors affecting cuttings’ physiological activities, including enzymes and other environmental elements, should also be considered. Since the growth process of cuttings and the environmental temperature and humidity are sequential data characterized by continuous changes at time nodes, it is feasible to combine the growth-state model of cuttings with the environmental model. In the future, the physiological model of cuttings, the environmental model, and the performance of the control system can be integrated into a unified environmental identification model. This would facilitate the growth control of cuttings, thereby improving the universality and transferability of the temperature and humidity environment model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y.; methodology, X.Y.; software, X.W. (Xu Wang) and L.L.; formal analysis, X.W. (Xu Wang) and L.L.; investigation, X.W. (Xu Wang) and L.L.; resources, X.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, X.W. (Xu Wang), L.L. and X.Y.; writing—review and editing, X.W. (Xu Wang), L.L., J.X., X.W. (Xiaosa Wang), H.G. and X.Y.; visualization, X.W. (Xiaosa Wang), L.L., P.W. and J.L.; supervision, P.W. and H.L.; project administration X.Y. and J.L.; funding acquisition, X.Y. and J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the earmarked fund for CARS (CARS-27) and supported by the Earmarked Fund for Hebei Apple Innovation Team of Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (HBCT2023120202).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thank you for the support provided by the First Station of Taihang Mountain.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Nomenclature

The symbols used in the formulas in the paper are shown in the following table:
Symbols
θThe intrinsic contact angle in the equation Young, °
θwThe intrinsic contact angle in the equation Wenzle, °
θcThe apparent contact angle in the equation Cassie-Baxter, °
θsThe contact angle of a surfactant drop on a solid surface, °
θvThe contact angle of a surfactant drop on a gas surface, °
rRoughness
f s The ratio of solid contact area to total area
f v The ratio of gas contact area to total area
γ SV Solid-gas interfacial tension, N·m−1
γ SL Solid-liquid interfacial tension, N·m−1
γ LV Gas-liquid interfacial tension, N·m−1
KFactors related to droplet properties
Oh Ohnesorge bumber
Re Reynolds number
We Weber number
K crit Surface characteristics of the wall hit, including roughness and wettability

References

  1. Porfírio, S.; da Silva, M.D.G.; Cabrita, M.J.; Azadi, P.; Peixe, A. Reviewing current knowledge on olive (Olea europaea L.) adventitious root formation. Sci. Hortic. 2016, 198, 207–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sang, Y.L.; Cheng, Z.J.; Zhang, X.S. Plant stem cells and de novo organogenesis. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 1334–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xu, L.; Huang, H. Genetic and epigenetic controls of plant regeneration. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2014, 108, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, K.; Yang, A.; Yan, J.D.; Liang, Z.L.; Yuan, G.P.; Cong, P.H.; Zhang, L.Y.; Han, X.L.; Zhang, C.X. MdAIL5 overexpression promotes apple adventitious shoot regeneration by regulating hormone signaling and activating the expression of shoot development-related genes. Hortic. Res. 2023, 10, uhad198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, Q.; Chen, S.C.; Huang, K.Y. Propagation Techniques for Shoot Cuttings of Toona Ciliata. For. Sci. Technol. 2023, 604, 72–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zha, S.; Shi, L.; Yu, F.Q.; Gao, R.; Wang, L.N.; He, P.; Hao, Y.Q.; Yang, H.F. Fast Propagation Technology of All-optical Spray softwood cuttings of Salix psammophila. J. Inn. Mong. Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2023, 44, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, X.M.; Huang, K.Y.; Li, K.P.; Chen, Q.; Lan, X.; Dai, J.; Cheng, L.; Chen, S.C.; Dong, L.J.; Mo, S.F. The Cutting Propagation Technology of Cunninghamia lanceolata Clones. Agric. Res. Appl. 2021, 34, 40–45. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, Y.; Huang, X.Y.; Zhuang, Q.Q. Experimental Study on Cutting Propagation of Honeysuckle. Agric. Jilin 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mehri, H.; Mhanna, K.; Soltane, A.; El-Hassen, A.; Faiez, R.; M’hamed, A. Performance of olive cuttings (Olea europaea L.) of different cultivars growing in the agro-climatic conditions of Al-Jouf (Saudi Arabia). Am. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 8, 41–49. [Google Scholar]
  10. Tsipouridis, C.; Thomidis, T.; Michailides, Z. Influence of some external factors on the rooting of GF677, peach and nectarine shoot hardwood cuttings. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 2005, 45, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Choab, N.; Allouhi, A.; El Maakoul, A.; Kousksou, T.; Saadeddine, S.; Jamil, A. Review on greenhouse microclimate and application: Design parameters, thermal modeling and simulation, climate controlling technologies. Sol. Energy 2019, 191, 109–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saridakis, G.; Kolokotsa, D.; Dolianitis, S. Development of an intelligent indoor environment and energy management system for greenhouses using a fuzzy logic controller and LonWorks® pro-tocol. In Proceedings of the EPEQUB Conference, Milos, Greece, 6–7 July 2006; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Businger, J.A. The Glasshouse Climate, Physics of Plant Environment; Van Wijk. North-Holland Publishing Co.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1963; pp. 270–318. [Google Scholar]
  14. Aaslyng, J.M.; Ehler, N.; Jakobsen, L. Climate control software integration with a greenhouse environmental control computer. Environ. Model. Softw. 2005, 20, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Du, S.F.; Li, Y.X.; Ma, C.W.; Chen, Q.Y.; Yang, W.Z. Current situation on greenhouse environment control system modes in China. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2004, 20, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  16. Miao, J.C.; Wang, R.H.; You, D. Intelligent agricultural greenhouse monitoring system based on the Internet of Things. Internet Things Technol. 2023, 13, 16–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Seo, K.K. A simulation study on an artificial neural network based automatic control system of a plant factory. Int. J. Control. Autom. 2013, 6, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, Y.; Gao, J.; Tunio, M.H.; Wang, L. Study on the Identification of Mildew Disease of Cuttings at the Base of Mulberry Cuttings by Aeroponics Rapid Propagation Based on a BP Neural Network. Agronomy 2022, 13, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lan, L.; Zhan, E.J. Effect of leaf number on development of new treetops and roots of rootstock cuttage of Malus asiatica Nakai. Shandong Agric. Sci. 2018, 50, 77–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, W.H.; Li, W.; Yin, J.J.; Feng, Y.J.; Ren, J.T.; He, C.Y. Experiment on hardwood cutting propagation of broussonetia papyrifera. For. Sci. Technol. 2023, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.M.; Li, B.J.; Yang, F.; Yi, K. Study on Green Branch Cutting Propagation of Apple Rootstock. China Fruits 2009, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, C.Y.; Yang, T.Z.; Gao, J.D.; Gao, J.D.; Wang, J.; Cai, H.C.; Du, X.M.; Wang, S.T.; Gong, G.H.; Wang, X.P.; et al. Research Progress on Anatomy Mechanism of Cutting Rooting of Apple Dwarf Rootstock. J. Shanxi Agric. Sci. 2017, 45, 1719–1720+1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, G.P.; Chen, Q.F.; Fan, X.P.; Liu, W.; Guo, H. Key techniques for the cuttage propagation of ’Y-1’ apple dwarfing stock. Mod. Hortic. 2024, 47, 94–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.H.; Li, J.D.; Li, T.; Zhuang, M.D.; Wang, P.F.; Zhang, H.X.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Y.X.; Xu, J.F. Exploring the influencing factors of young branch cutting of Du Li. China Fruits 2023, 29–34+141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, H.M.; Jia, S.J.; Li, W.; Jiang, C.Y.; Ren, Y.M.; Liu, R. Cutting Techniques of Cherry Dwarf Rootstock Gisela Twig. Mod. Rural. Sci. Technol. 2023, 621, 58–59. [Google Scholar]
  26. Tewfik, A.A. Effect of IBA, planting media and type of cutting on rooting of Nemaguard peach rootstock under Egyptian Conditions. Int. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2001, 592, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiao, Z.F. Impact of Juvenility on the Adventitious Rooting of Leafy Cuttings in Apple Rootstocks. Master’s Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dai, J.L.; Zhang, S.L.; Wu, R.H.; Bai, Y.E. Research progress on seedling-cultivation techniques of wild apricot. China Fruits 2019, 200, 17–21. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yoon, A.; Oh, H.E.; Kim, S.Y.; Park, Y.G. Plant growth regulators and rooting substrates affect growth and development of Salix koriyanagi cuttings. Rhizosphere 2021, 20, 100437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dawa, S.; Rather, Z.A.; Stobgais, T.; Angdus, T.; Lakdan, S.; Tundup, P. Effect of growth regulators and growth media on the rhizogenesis of some genotypes of rose through stem cuttings. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2018, 7, 1138–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kalanzi, F.; Mwanja, C.K. Effect of nodal cutting position and plant growth regulator on bud sprouting of Dendrocalamus giganteus Wall. Ex Munro in Uganda. Adv. Bamboo Sci. 2023, 2, 100016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Xie, Y.; Chen, T.; Ren, H. Rhizome Weight and Number of Sectioning per Rhizome Determine Plantlet Growth and Propagation Rate of Hemerocallis citrina Baroni in Cutting Propagation. Agronomy 2022, 12, 2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Markovski, A.; Popovska, M.; Gjamovski, V. Investigation of the possibility for production of some stone fruit rootstocks by rooting cuttings. Acta Agric. Serbica 2015, 20, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Natale, S.; Tomasella, M.; Gargiulo, S.; Petruzzellis, F.; Tromba, G.; Boccato, E.; Nardini, A. Stem photosynthesis contributes to non-structural carbohydrate pool and modulates xylem vulnerability to embolism in Fraxinus ornus L. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 210, 105315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Qiu, J. Study on Cutting Propagation and Tissue Culture Techniques of Michelia ‘Zhongshanhanxiao’. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  36. Van Dongen, J.T.; Gupta, K.J.; Ramírez-Aguilar, S.J.; Araújo, W.L.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Fernie, A.R. Regulation of respiration in plants: A role for alternative metabolic pathways. J. Plant Physiol. 2011, 168, 1434–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ariura, R.; Matsumoto, M.; Li, J.; Fuse, T.; Aoki, T.; Zhang, Y.; Watanabe, M. Effects of elevated ozone and carbon dioxide on the dynamic photosynthesis of Fagus crenata seedlings under variable light conditions. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 891, 164398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chen, X.; Jiang, Z.; Tai, Q.; Shen, C.; Rao, Y.; Zhang, W. Construction of a photosynthetic rate prediction model for greenhouse strawberries with distributed regulation of light environment. Math. Biosci. Eng. 2022, 19, 12774–12791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. He, Y.; Matthews, M.L. Seasonal climate conditions impact the effectiveness of improving photosynthesis to increase soybean yield. Field Crops Res. 2023, 296, 108907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Kichah, A.; Bournet, P.E.; Migeon, C.; Boulard, T. Measurement and CFD simulation of microclimate characteristics and transpiration of an Impatiens pot plant crop in a greenhouse. Biosyst. Eng. 2012, 112, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Morille, B.; Migeon, C.; Bournet, P.E. Is the Penman–Monteith model adapted to predict crop transpiration under greenhouse conditions Application to a New Guinea Impatiens crop. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 152, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baglivo, C.; Mazzeo, D.; Panico, S.; Bonuso, S.; Matera, N.; Congedo, P.; Oliveti, G. Complete greenhouse dynamic simulation tool to assess the crop thermal well-being and energy needs. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 179, 115698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rapaka, V.K.; Bessler, B.; Schreiner, M.; Druege, U. Interplay between initial carbohydrate availability, current photosynthesis, and adventitious root formation in Pelargonium cuttings. Plant Sci. 2005, 168, 1547–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, N. Preliminary Study on Cutting and Tissue Culture Propagation Technology of Pterocarya stenoptera. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Qu, T.H. Experimental Study on Improving Lipid Productivity of Chlorella vulgaris by Supplementation Phytohormones and Light Quality Shift. Master’s Thesis, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, L. Study on Cutting Propagation Technique and Rooting Mechanism of SH40 Apple Dwarf Rootstock. Master’s Thesis, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu, G.J.; Li, X.Y.; You, X.L.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.H.; Liu, G.F. The Relationship between Endogenous Hormone Changes and Adventitious Root Production in the Cutting of Larix gmelinii. J. Northeast. For. Univ. 2000, 19–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, A.P.; Gan, P.H.; Zong, D.; Fei, X.; Zhong, Y.Y.; Li, S.Q.; Yu, J.; He, C.Z. Bark tissue transcriptome analyses of inverted Populus yunnanensis cuttings reveal the crucial role of plant hormones in response to inversion. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bao, X.Y. Study on the Shoot Cutting Propagation Technology and Rooting Mechanism of Viburnum trilobum. Master’s Thesis, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, H.D. Study of CuttingPropagation Technology and Biochemical Factors of Photiniax fraseri. Master’s Thesis, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  51. Niu, T.; Wang, H.X.; Zhang, L.; Li, C.X.; Wei, X.Y.; Sun, F.; Yu, Y.C.; Wang, C.X. Study on Cutting Rooting Characteristics and Anatomical Observation of Lagerstroemia indica. Shandong Agric. Sci. 2013, 45, 66–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Castañeda-Saucedo, M.C.; Tapia-Campos, E.; Ramírez-Anaya, J.P.; Beltrán, J. Growth and development of stevia cuttings during propagation with hormones in different months of the year. Plants 2020, 9, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chen, Y.B.; Sun, Z.W.; Jiang, N.; Zheng, X.J. Effects of of Shoot Age and Hormone on Cutting Propagation of Ampelopsis Grossedentata. Hubei Agric. Sci. 2017, 56, 4085–4087+4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, N. Studies on the Softwood Cutting Propagating Technology and Rooting Mechanism of Ulmus pumila L. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  55. Niu, L.S. The Effect of Different Environments, Substrates and Hormones on the Hard Branch Cutting of Seabuckthorn. Agric. Eng. Technol. 2020, 40, 27+30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Du, X.M.; Gao, J.D.; Wang, J.; Cai, H.C.; Li, C.Y.; Wang, S.T.; Yang, T.Z. A Study on the Factors Influencing the Rooting of Green Branch cuttings in ‘Red Full Hall’. J. Shanxi Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2023, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, M.G.; Zhang, J.C.; Liu, K.L.; Wang, D.Z.; Ma, J.M.; Zhao, P.; Sun, X.B.; Yu, Z.Y. Study on Hardwood Cutting of Acer buergerianum in Minqin Desert Area. Agric. Sci. -Technol. Inf. 2023, 137–140+148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Jiang, C.; Lu, M.Z.; Zhang, J. Exogenous hormones supplementation improve adventitious root formation in woody plants. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 1009531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Druege, U.; Hilo, A.; Pérez-Pérez, J.M.; Klopotek, Y.; Acosta, M.; Shahinnia, F.; Zerche, S.; Franken, P.; Hajirezaei, M.R. Molecular and physiological control of adventitious rooting in cuttings: Phytohormone action meets resource allocation. Ann. Bot. 2019, 123, 929–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fan, L.W. Exgenous Hormones in Acer Truncatum Twig Cutting Propagation Technology Application and Rooting Mechanism. Master’s Thesis, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang, B.L.; Yu, S.Q.; Jiang, X.R.; Tu, S.P. NAA+IBA on rooting process in cuttings of Euscaphis konishii. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 2023, 43, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Bartel, B.; LeClere, S.; Magidin, M.; Zolman, B.K. Inputs to the active indole-3-acetic acid pool: De novo synthesis, conjugate hydrolysis, and indole-3-butyric acid b-oxidation. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2001, 20, 198–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Peng, F.F.; Li, X.L.; Wei, Z.X.; Yang, H.J.; Han, G.H. Establishment of Rapid Propagation System of Mulberry by Tissue Culture and Branch Cutting in Vitro. Mol. Plant Breed. 2021, 19, 7547–7555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Huang, J.W.; Li, M.; Tang, K.; Zhao, P.; Dong, S.; Li, L.M.; Li, Y.Q. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Rooting of Aquilaria sinensis Cuttings. Hubei Agric. Sci. 2015, 54, 2428–2431+2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Shi, F.H.; Zhao, R.; Luo, S.; Zheng, C.; Shen, Y.B. Study on plant hormone changes in soft cuttings of Tilia miqueliana during rooting. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 2019, 39, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, Y.H.; Yan, L.P.; Kong, Y.G.; Wu, D.J.; Ren, F.; Liang, J. Anatomy and endogenous hormone changes of softwood cutting rooting of Fraxinus velutina. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 2023, 43, 28–35+52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Jia, B. Study on the Key Factors Affecting of Cerasus humilis Cuttings in Closed Box Environment. Master’s Thesis, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Dong, X.H.; Shan, D.P.; Liu, L.C.; Shi, Y.Q.; Wang, C.L.; Sun, Y.; Sun, H.; Sun, D.L. The Effect of Different Rooting Agent Concentrations and Substrates on Industrial Cannabis Cutting. Spec. Econ. Anim. Plants 2023, 26, 15–16+27. [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhu, S.Y. Study on the Propagation Technologies and Rooting Mechanism of Green Branches Cutting in Tilia miqueliana. Master’s Thesis, Soochow University, Soochow, China, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xu, C.G.; Zhang, C.Y.; Jin, Z.Y.; Che, D.D. Effect of IAA on the Rooting of Parthenocissus Thomsoni Cuttings. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2017, 19, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, J.T.; Zhao, L.; Liang, H.R.; Yu, W.L.; Lu, M.; Wu, R.H.; Liu, P.S. Effects of Different Hormones and Concentration Treatments on Softwood Cutting Rooting of Picea abies. Inn. Mong. For. Investig. Des. 2021, 44, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, Z.C.; Yan, L.W.; Chen, Y.Y. The Effect of Low Temperature Treatment on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Passion Flower Cutting Seedlings. South China Fruits 2021, 50, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, Y.; Chen, X. Study on Several Factors influencing Flowering of Test-tube Plantlets Cultured in vitro of Rhododendron hybridum. J. Anhui Agri. Sci. 2008, 36, 9405–9407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tang, H. Study on the Optimization of the Reproduction System of Osmanthus fragrans and the Influence of Environmental Factors on Its Growth and Development in Cultivated Areas. Master’s Thesis, Chongqing Three Gorges University, Chongqing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Henrique, A.; Campinhos, E.N.; Ono, E.O.; Pinho, S.Z.D. Effect of plant growth regulators in the rooting of Pinus cuttings. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2006, 49, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mesén, F.; Newton, A.C.; Leakey, R.R.B. The effects of propagation environment and foliar area on the rooting physiology of Cordia alliodora (Ruiz & Pavon) Oken cuttings. Trees 1997, 11, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. OuYang, F.; Wang, J.; Li, Y. Effects of cutting size and exogenous hormone treatment on rooting of shoot cuttings in Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.]. New For. 2015, 46, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Qiu, F.Y.; Zhong, Y.T.; Zhang, T.; Liu, X.L.; Li, J. Effect of scion types and leaves number on cutting propagati of Cinnamomum porrectum. South China For. Sci. 2018, 46, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Gao, M.Q. Effects of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 and Temperature, Nitrogen Addition on the Photosynthetic Characteristics and Biomass Distribution of Hybrid Poplar Saplings. Master’s Thesis, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Cao, X.; Du, W.; Shang, C.; Liu, L.; Cheng, J.L. Comparative transcriptome reveals circadian and hormonal control of adventitious rooting in mulberry hardwood cuttings. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, Y.T.; Ye, W.M.; Xiong, D.C.; Wu, C.; Huang, J.X.; Chen, S.D.; Yang, Z.J. Seasonal dynamics in photosynthetic characteristics and growth of Cunninghamia lanceolata saplings and their response to soil warming. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2023, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Shang, C.; Yang, H.; Ma, S.; Shen, Q.D.; Liu, L.; Hou, C.X.; Cao, X.; Cheng, J.L. Physiological and transcriptomic changes during the early phases of adventitious root formation in mulberry stem hardwood cuttings. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Chen, F.F.; Zeng, X.Q.; Yang, Z.Y.; Yang, Z.L.; Duan, Z.J. Technology of Cephalotaxus mannii Cutting Seedlings and Research of Seedbed Environmental Regulation. Guangxi For. Sci. 2016, 45, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, X.M. Cutting Propagation Techniques and Rooting Mechanism of Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  85. Kong, Z.Q. Effects of Environmental Factors and Cutting Treatment Methods on Rooting of Acca sellowiana Berg Cuttings. Master’s Thesis, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, X.X.; Zang, J.H.; An, J.R. Response of Grape Twig Cutting to Different Substrates, Temperature and Humidity. GanSu Agric. 2016, 32–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Puri, S.; Thompson, F.B. Relationship of water to adventitious rooting in stem cuttings of Populus species. Agrofor. Syst. 2003, 58, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. East, A.R.; Araya, X.I.T.; Hertog, M.; Nicholson, S.E.; Mawson, A.J. The effect of controlled atmospheres on respiration and rate of quality change in ‘Unique’feijoa fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009, 53, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lebude, A.V.; Goldfarb, B.; Blazich, F.A.; Wise, F.C.; Framption, J. Mist, substrate water potential and cutting water potential influence rooting of stem cuttings of loblolly pine. Tree Physiol. 2004, 24, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. LeBude, A.V.; Goldfarb, B.; Blazich, F.A.; Frampton, J.; Wise, F. Mist level influences vapor pressure deficit and gas exchange during rooting of juvenile stem cuttings of loblolly pine. HortScience 2005, 40, 1448–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Murthy, R.; Goldfarb, B. Effect of handling and water stress on water status and rooting of loblolly pine stem cuttings. New For. 2001, 21, 217–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Wei, D.D. Numerical Simulation of Thermal Environment and Ventilation Characteristics of solar Greenhouse. Master’s Thesis, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dessy, S.; Radice, S.; Andorno, A.; Ontivero, M. Ferdor-Julior, Myran-Yumir and St. julien GF 655-2 rootstocks: Propagation by cuttings with growth regulators and bottom heat. Acta Hortic. 2002, 658, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Druege, U.; Zerche, S.; Kadner, R. Nitrogen-and storage-affected carbohydrate partitioning in high-light-adapted Pelargonium cuttings in relation to survival and adventitious root formation under low light. Ann. Bot. 2004, 94, 831–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Zhu, T.F.; Li, X.; Su, X.L.; Zhou, Y.J.; Tang, K.F.; Yin, J.F.; Ren, H.P.; Wang, L.C. Analysis of the changes in the contents of cuttings during the cutting process of four species of fruit trees in the Rosaceae family. South China Fruits 2023, 52, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jia, T.; Li, Z.X. Preliminary report on the study of green branch cuttings Malus baccata Borkh. J. Shanxi Agric. Univ. 1984, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Mayer, N.A.; Reighard, G.L.; Bridges, W. Peach rootstock propagation under intermittent mist system. Acta Hortic. 2013, 1084, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ye, Y.; Ou, C.Q.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y.J.; Ma, L.; Li, S.R.; Liu, Y.L.; Jiang, S.L.; Lin, Y.G. Study on green branches cutting propagation of pear dwarfing rootstock ‘Zhong ai 1’. China Fruits 2023, 24–29+2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, H.M.; Zhang, H.F.; Dong, Z.X.; Dong, Z.; Wang, L.C.; Zhou, Z.J. Effect of Vermicompost, Cutting parts and Cutting Timeon Rooting of Fraxinus americana Shoot Cuttings. For. Sci. Technol. 2023, 48, 31–34+59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, J.L.; Shen, F.Y.; Chang, X.W.; Li, C.M.; Yang, L.X. Rooting characteristics of Betula costata softwood cuttings. J. Cent. South Univ. For. Technol. 2023, 43, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, J. Study on Propagation Technology of Davidia involucrata Seedlings. Hortic. Seed 2023, 43, 36–37+69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhang, C.H. Estimation model of Leaf Wetness Duration on Cucumber Leaves and Automatic Control in Solar Greenhouse Based on Temperatu. Master’s Thesis, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Li, W.J. Frost Prevention Measures for Red Plum and Apricot Sheds and Numerical Simulation Based on CFD. Master’s Thesis, Ningxia University, Yinchuan, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lamrani, M.A.; Boulard, T.; Roy, J.C.; Jaffrin, A. SE—Structures and Environment: AirFlows and Temperature Patterns induced in a Confined Greenhouse. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 2001, 78, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Ali, H.; Bournet, P.; Cannavo, P.; Chantoiseau, E. Development of a CFD crop submodel for simulating microclimate and transpiration of ornamental plants grown in a greenhouse under water restriction. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 149, 26–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Kacira, M.; Short, T.H.; Stowell, R.R. A CFD evaluation of naturally ventilated, multi-span, sawtooth greenhouses. Trans. ASAE 1998, 41, 833–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Cheng, X.; Li, D.; Shao, L.; Ren, Z. A virtual sensor simulation system of a flower greenhouse coupled with a new temperature microclimate model using three-dimensional CFD. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2021, 181, 105934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sethi, V.P.; Sumathy, K.; Lee, C.; Pal, D.S. Thermal modeling aspects of solar greenhouse microclimate control: A review on heating technologies. Sol. Energy 2013, 96, 56–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bao, E.; Cao, Y.; Zou, Z.; Shen, T.; Zhang, Y. Research progress of thermal storage technology in energy-saving solar greenhouse. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2018, 34, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Li, Y.; Sun, G.; Wang, X. Temperature field-wind velocity field optimum control of greenhouse environment based on CFD model. Math. Probl. Eng. 2014, 2014, 949128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Litago, J.; Baptista, F.J.; Meneses, J.F.; Navas, L.M.; Bailey, B.J.; Sánchez-Girón, V. Statistical modelling of the microclimate in a naturally ventilated greenhouse. Biosyst. Eng. 2005, 92, 365–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Baeza, E.J.; Pérez-Parra, J.J.; Lopez, J.C.; Montero, J.I. CFD study of the natural ventilation performance of a parral type greenhouse with different numbers of spans and roof vent configurations. Acta Hortic. 2006, 719, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Wang, C.Q.; Ni, X.N.; Wei, M.; Li, Q.M.; Wang, S.J.; Cao, X. Cooling Effect of Plastic Greenhouse with Different Ventilation Modes Based on CFD. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2023, 54, 351–356+439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Nebbali, R.; Roy, J.C.; Boulard, T. Dynamic simulation of the distributed radiative and convective climate within a cropped greenhouse. Renew. Energy 2012, 43, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Teitel, M.; Atias, M.; Barak, M. Gradients of temperature, humidity and CO2 along a fan-ventilated greenhouse. Biosyst. Eng. 2010, 106, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wu, F.Q.; Zhang, L.B.; Xu, F.; Chen, J.L.; Chen, X. Numerical simulation of thermal environment in a mechanically ventilated Greenhouse. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2010, 41, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zheng, R.L.; Yang, W.; Liu, Z.Q. Numerical simulation of humid heat characteristics in solar greenhouse under different ventilation modes. J. China Agric. Univ. 2023, 28, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wang, J.; Yang, Q.C.; Wei, L.L.; Tong, Y.X. The energy-saving effect of collaborative cooling of fans and air conditioning in artificial light plant factories. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2013, 29, 177–183. [Google Scholar]
  119. Ohyama, K.; Kozai, T.; Kubota, C.; Chun, C.; Hasegawa, T.; Yokoi, S.; Nishimura, M. Coefficient of performance for cooling of a home-use air conditioner installed in a closed-type transplant production system. J. Soc. High Technol. Agric. (Jpn.) 2022, 14, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Han, Y.; Xue, X.; Luo, X.; Guo, L.; Li, T. Establishment of estimation model of solar radiation within solar greenhouse. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2014, 30, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zhao, M.Z.; Hu, X.M.; Chang, C.; Meng, Z.J.; Su, H.L.; Duan, P.Y. Study on the influence of a vertical heat exchange tube on the thermal environment of an arch greenhouse. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica 2023, 44, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Vafai, K.; Tien, C.L. Boundary and inertia effects on flow and heat transfer in porous media. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1981, 24, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Santamouris, M.; Mihalakakou, G.; Balaras, C.A.; Lewis, J.O.; Vallindras, M.; Argiriou, A. Energy conservation in greenhouses with buried pipes. Energy 1996, 21, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Horton, R.; Wierenga, P.J.; Nielsen, D.R. Evaluation of methods for determining the apparent thermal diffusivity of soil near the surface. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1983, 47, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. YAN, T.; DU, Z.Y. Study on the heat and moisture transfer principles of soil field surrounding the soil-air heat exchanger in solar greenhouse. J. Eng. Thermophys. 2018, 39, 434–441. [Google Scholar]
  126. Yuan, Q.; Lu, W.; Wang, J.; Chen, R.; Li, Y.S.; Yu, X.C.; He, C.X.; Sun, M.T.; Yan, Y. Effects of the irrigation strategies of accumulated solar radiation on cucumber yield and quality under different soil textures in the greenhouse. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2023, 39, 98–105. [Google Scholar]
  127. Zhu, J.L. Construction and Verification of Prediction Model of Effective Thermal Conductivity of Cultivation Substrate in Solar Greenhouse. Master’s Thesis, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhu, J.L.; Zhang, X.D.; Jie, J.M.; Han, K.N.; Ma, N.; Mao, E.H.; Li, L.J. Prediction models for the effective thermal conductivity of cultivation substrates in solar greenhouses. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2021, 37, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Pan, S.P. Design and Experimental Study of Soil Steam Disinfection Machine Based on Pulsating Combustion Technology. Ph.D. Thesis, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Amanowicz, Ł.; Wojtkowiak, J. Validation of CFD model for simulation of multi-pipe earth-to-air heat exchangers (EAHEs) flow performance. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2018, 5, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Florides, G.; Kalogirou, S. Ground heat exchangers—A review of systems, models and applications. Renew. Energy 2007, 32, 2461–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Mi, Z.T. Design Experiment of Apple Rootstock Cutting Breeding Incubator. Master’s Thesis, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhang, Y.B.; Hu, W.L.; Wang, J.; Guan, Y.; Lin, Y.S.; Zhao, S.Y. Airside performance of fin-tube heat exchangers for cooling dehumidification in greenhouses. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2022, 38, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Liu, C.L. Research on Intelligent Control System of Temperature and Humidity in Tomato Greenhouse. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, G.; Fu, Z.; Yang, M.; Liu, X.; Dong, Y.; Li, X. Nonlinear Simulation for Coupling Modeling of air Humidity and Vent Opening in Chinese Solar Greenhouse Based on CFD. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2019, 162, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Bouhoun Ali, H.; Bournet, P.E.; Danjou, V.; Migeon, C. CFD analysis of the climate inside a closed greenhouse at night including condensation and crop transpiration. Acta Hortic. 2015, 1170, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Piscia, D.; Montero, J.I.; Baeza, E.; Bailey, B.J. A CFD greenhouse night-time condensation model. Biosyst. Eng. 2012, 111, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Jiao, W.; Liu, Q.; Gao, L.; Liu, K.; Shi, R.; Ta, N. Computational fluid dynamics-based simulation of crop canopy temperature and humidity in double-film solar greenhouse. J. Sens. 2020, 2020, 8874468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Roy, J.C.; Fatnassi, H.; Boulard, T.; Pouillard, J.B.; Grisey, A. CFD determination of the climate distribution in a semi closed greenhouse with air cooling. Acta Hortic. 2015, 1170, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ding, J.P. The Effect of Vapor Pressure Deficit on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Nutrient Absorption of Tomato at Different Temperatures. Master’s Thesis, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Salazar, R.; López-Cruz, I.L.; Mauricio, A.M.; Schmidt, U.; Miranda, L. A physical model for water balance in a semi-closed greenhouse. Acta Hortic. 2015, 1170, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Zhang, P. Measurement and Simulation of the Effects of Varied Vapour Pressure Deficits and Soil Water Deficits on Crop Water Use Efficiency. Ph.D. Thesis, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, China, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kittas, C.; Bartzanas, T. Greenhouse microclimate and dehumidification effectiveness under different ventilator configurations. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 3774–3784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kang, F.; Wu, X.Y.; Wang, Y.X.; Zheng, Y.J.; Li, S.G.; Chen, C.C. Research progress and prospect of pesticide droplet deposition characteristics. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2021, 37, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. He, Y.; Xiao, S.P.; Fang, H.; Dong, T.; Tang, Y.; Nei, P.C.; Wu, J.J.; Luo, S.M. Development situation and spraying decision of spray nozzle for plant protection UAV. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2018, 34, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zheng, Y.J.; Chen, B.T.; Wu, H.T.; Kang, F.; Jiang, S.J. Research progress of orchard plant protection mechanization technology and equipment in China. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Zwertvaegher, I.K.; Verhaeghe, M.; Brusselman, E.; Verboven, P.; Lebeau, F.; Massinon, M.; Nicolai, B.; Nuyttens, D. The impact and retention of spray droplets on a horizontal hydrophobic surface. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 126, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Massinon, M.; Boukhalfa, H.; Lebeau, F. The effect of surface orientation on spray retention. Precis. Agric. 2014, 15, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Devi, M.J.; Reddy, V.R. Transpiration response of cotton to vapor pressure deficit and its relationship with stomatal traits. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Shao, F.; Wang, L.; Sun, F.; Li, G.; Yu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, X.; Yan, H.; Dong, L.; Bao, Z. Study on different particulate matter retention capacities of the leaf surfaces of eight common garden plants in Hangzhou, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 652, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. MA XH, L.A.N.Z.; WANG, K. Dancing droplet: Interface phenomena and process regulation. CIESC J. 2018, 69, 9–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Boukhalfa, H.H.; Massinon, M.; Belhamra, M.; Lebeau, F. Contribution of spray droplet pinning fragmentation to canopy retention. Crop Prot. 2014, 56, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Rioboo, R.; Tropea, C.; Marengo, M. Outcomes from a drop impact on solid surfaces. At. Sprays 2001, 11, 12–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Yoon, S.S.; DesJardin, P.E. Modelling spray impingement using linear stability theories for droplet shattering. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 2006, 50, 469–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Roisman, I.V.; Rioboo, R.; Tropea, C. Normal impact of a liquid drop on a dry surface: Model for spreading and receding. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2002, 458, 1411–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kim, H.Y.; Chun, J.H. The recoiling of liquid droplets upon collision with solid surfaces. Phys. Fluids 2001, 13, 643–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Xu, H.; Liu, Y.; He, P.; Wang, H. The TAR model for calculation of droplet/wall impingement. J. Fluids Eng. 1998, 120, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Okumura, K.; Chevy, F.; Richard, D.; Quéré, D.; Clanet, C. Water spring: A model for bouncing drops. Europhys. Lett. 2003, 62, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Attané, P.; Girard, F.; Morin, V. An energy balance approach of the dynamics of drop impact on a solid surface. Phys. Fluids 2007, 19, 012101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Massinon, M.; Lebeau, F. Experimental method for the assessment of agricultural spray retention based on high-speed imaging of drop impact on a synthetic superhydrophobic surface. Biosyst. Eng. 2012, 112, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Mao, T.; Kuhn, D.C.; Tran, H. Spread and rebound of liquid droplets upon impact on flat surfaces. AIChE J. 1997, 43, 2169–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Dorr, G.J.; Wang, S.; Mayo, L.C.; McCue, S.W.; Forster, W.A.; Hanan, J.; He, X. Impaction of spray droplets on leaves: Influence of formulation and leaf character on shatter, bounce and adhesion. Exp. Fluids 2015, 56, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Mundo, C.H.R.; Sommerfeld, M.; Tropea, C. Droplet-wall collisions: Experimental studies of the deformation and breakup process. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 1995, 21, 151–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Seneviratne, S.I.; Corti, T.; Davin, E.L.; Hirschi, M.; Jaeger, E.B.; Lehner, I.; Orlowsky, B.; Teuling, A.J. Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: A review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2010, 99, 125–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Yanful, E.K.; Mousavi, S.M.; Yang, M. Modeling and measurement of evaporation in moisture-retaining soil covers. Adv. Environ. Res. 2003, 7, 783–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ward, P.R.; Whisson, K.; Micin, S.F.; Zeelenberg, D.; Milroy, S.P. The impact of wheat stubble on evaporation from a sandy soil. Crop Pasture Sci. 2009, 60, 730–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Suo, G.D.; Xie, Y.S.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, H. Long-term effects of different surface mulching techniques on soil water and fruit yield in an apple orchard on the Loess Plateau of China. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 246, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Seguin, D.; Montillet, A.; Comiti, J. Experimental characterisation of flow regimes in various porous media—I: Limit of laminar flow regime. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1998, 53, 3751–3761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Chen, J.; Xie, X.; Zheng, X.; Xue, J.; Miao, C.; Du, Q.; Xu, Y. Effects of sand-mulch thickness on soil evaporation during the freeze–thaw period. Hydrol. Process. 2020, 34, 2830–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Miralles, D.G.; Van Den Berg, M.J.; Teuling, A.J.; De Jeu, R.A.M. Soil moisture-temperature coupling: A multiscale observational analysis. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2012, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Berg, A.; Sheffield, J. Soil moisture–evapotranspiration coupling in CMIP5 models: Relationship with simulated climate and projections. J. Clim. 2018, 31, 4865–4878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Yang, L.; Sun, G.; Zhi, L.; Zhao, J. Negative soil moisture-precipitation feedback in dry and wet regions. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Chang, X.M.; Ji, G.P.; Zhang, D.H.; Qian, D.D.; Niu, L.L. Effects of Drip-head Flowon Water Distribution and Fruit Tree Growth in Sandy Loam Soil. J. Fruit Resour. 2023, 4, 30–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Xue, A.X. Effects of Different Substrates on the Growth and Root System of Fokienia hodginsii Cuttage Container Seedlings. J. Green Sci. Technol. 2023, 25, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Long, Z.L.; Huang, G.; Fu, Y.; Ou Yang, K.X.; Zhao, Y. Effects of Different Substrates on Cutting and Sowing Seedling Raising of Tetrapanax papyrifer. Hortic. Seed 2023, 43, 1–2+75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Guo, H.X. Factors Affecting the Propagation of Willow Cuttings. Agric. Eng. Technol. 2022, 42, 31–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Wang, H.G.; Liu, Y.W.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.Y.; Gao, Z.T. Softwood Cutting Seedling Raising Technology of Acanthopanax Senticosus in Xiaoxing′anling Area. For. Sci. Technol. 2022, 47, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Zheng, C.Y.; Liu, Y.B.; Lv, W.W.; Lu, P.; Wang, Z.G.; Hu, X.Y. Propagation Experiment of Chosenia arbutifolia with Softwood Cutting. J. Jilin For. Sci. Technol. 2022, 51, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Wang, T. Studies on Influencing Factors of Cutting Roots and Tissue Culture Techniques of Hippophae rhamnoides L. Master’s Thesis, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  180. Duan, Y.Y. Study on the Softword Cutting Technology of Acer Saccharum. Shanxi For. Sci. Technol. 2023, 52, 22–23+54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Shao, L.; Liu, Y.H.; Huang, W.C.; Liang, L. Effects of Substrate Ratio an Rooting Duration Acclimation and Transplanting of Morinda offcinalis Issue Culture Seedlings. J. Chin. Med. Mater. 2022, 45, 2285–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Liu, Y.C.; Jin, H.Q.; Li, X.Q.; Wang, Y.M.; Du, H.B. Effects of mixed substrates with different particle sizes on chili seedling cultivation. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2022, 50, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Li, N. Study on Plus Tree Selection and Cutting Propagation Technology of Acer Triflorum. Master’s Thesis, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Yao, S.F. Propagating Techology and Rooting Mechanism of Rosa hybrida ‘Mountain sunrise’ Softwood Cuttings. Master’s Thesis, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Zhou, L.Y.; Zhao, S.W.; Du, Q.J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, J.Q.; Xiao, H.J.; Li, J.Q.; Li, M. Peanut shell substrate ratio affects growth, yield and quality of watermelon. Zhongguo Gua-Cai 2022, 35, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Zhu, Q.L.; Chi, B.J.; Tong, C.X.; Zhang, H.X.; Hu, K.; Guo, L.M.; Zhou, B.Q.; Mao, Y.L. Effect of peanut shell replacing peat soil on cultivation substrate properties and Anoectochilus roxburghii growthand quality. Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 36, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Qi, C.H.; Zeng, Y.T.; Xu, J.N.; Ni Ma, Z.G. Effects of Different Substrates and Densities on Breeding of Virus-Free Original Cultivar Seeds of Potato. Shandong Agric. Sci. 2023, 55, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Yao, H.M.; Zhou, H.D. The influence of ten organic substrate combinations on the cultivation of tea pot seedlings. South China Agric. 2022, 16, 12–14+18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Xu, Y.F.; Liu, H.G.; Mei, H.; Li, D.; Liu, X.S.; Chang, Y.R.; Li, Y.F. An Optimization Model for Rotation Irrigation Groups and Irrigation Duration for Pressurized Drip Irrigation System. J. Irrig. Drain. 2023, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Kong, W.L. Analysis of effective water-saving measures in agricultural water conservancy irrigation. Agric. Henan 2023, 59–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Liang, Y.; Yang, J.G. Circuit Design of Greenhouse Sprinkler Irrigation System Based on Internet of Things Technology. J. Smart Agric. 2022, 2, 20–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Huang, P.F.; Kang, Y.H.; Wan, S.Q.; Li, X.B.; Huang, Y.L.; Liu, C.C. Water and salt transport patterns in cracked alkaline soil under drip irrigation with loose water medium. Chin. J. Soil Sci. 2023, 54, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Zhou, W.; Li, Y.B.; Wang, X.C. Model Predictive Control of Air Temperature in Greenhouse Based on CFD Unsteady Model. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2014, 45, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Xiao, Y.; Wu, M.L. Application Status and Development Trend of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Agricultural Engineering. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2023, 25, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Putter, E.; Gouws, J. An automatic controller for a greenhouse using a supervisory expert system. In Proceedings of the 8th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference on Industrial Applications in Power Systems, Computer Science and Telecommunications (MELECON 96), Bari, Italy, 16 May 1996; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 1996; Volume 2, pp. 1160–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Pasgianos, G.D.; Arvanitis, K.G.; Polycarpou, P.; Sigrimis, N. A nonlinear feedback technique for greenhouse environmental control. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2003, 40, 153–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Boulard, T.; Wang, S. Experimental and numerical studies on the heterogeneity of crop transpiration in a plastic tunnel. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2002, 34, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Liu, W.; Chen, Q. Optimal air distribution design in enclosed spaces using an adjoint method. Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. 2015, 23, 760–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Xu, F.; Cai, Y.W.; Chen, J.L.; Zhang, L.B. Temperature/flow field simulation and parameter optimal design for greenhouses with fan-pad evaporative cooling system. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2015, 31, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Saberian, A.; Sajadiye, S.M. The effect of dynamic solar heat load on the greenhouse microclimate using CFD simulation. Renew. Energy 2019, 138, 722–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Singh, M.C.; Singh, J.P.; Singh, K.G. Development of a microclimate model for prediction of temperatures inside a naturally ventilated greenhouse under cucumber crop in soilless media. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 154, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Li, K.J.; Zhang, S.T.; Meng, Y.F.; Mao, H.P. Optimization Strategy of Greenhouse Multiple Environmental Factors Considering Temporal and Spatiotemporal Variability. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2021, 52, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Boulard, T.; Roy, J.C.; Pouillard, J.B.; Fatnassi, H.; Grisey, A. Modelling of micrometeorology, canopy transpiration and photosynthesis in a closed greenhouse using computational fluid dynamics. Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 158, 110–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Zhang, Y.; Gao, W.B.; Zou, Z.R. Performance experiment and CFD simulation of heat exchange in solar greenhouse with active thermal storage back-wall. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2015, 31, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Liu, Y.H.; Shen, M.X.; Xiong, Y.J.; Liu, Y.; Gao, J.L.; Jin, W.X. Data Transmission of WSN System in Greenhouse Based on Two-level Prediction. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2014, 45, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Chen, Y. Temperature prediction model for solar greenhouse based on improved BP neural network. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. IOP Publ. 2020, 1639, 012036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Yu, H.; Chen, Y.; Hassan, S.G.; Li, D.L. Prediction of the temperature in a Chinese solar greenhouse based on LSSVM optimized by improved PSO. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2016, 122, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ren, Y.Z.; Chen, X.R.; Jia, J.D.; Gao, W.L.; Zhu, J.J. Environment Monitoring and Temperature Prediction in Greenhouse Based on Wechat Platform. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 48, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Du, T.H.; Liu, D.; Shu, S.G.; Qian, C.Y.; Liang, Q.W. Optimal temperature control of solar greenhouse based on MPC method. China Meas. Test 2022, 48, 85–91+167. [Google Scholar]
  210. Jung, D.H.; Kim, H.S.; Jhin, C.; Kim, H.; Park, S.H. Time-serial analysis of deep neural network models for prediction of climatic conditions inside a greenhouse. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 173, 105402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Guillén-Navarro, M.; Martínez-España, R.; Bueno-Crespo, A.; CECILIA, J. An LSTM Deep Learning Scheme for Prediction of Low Temperatures in Agriculture. Intell. Environ. (Workshops) 2019, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Hu, J.; Lei, W.Y.; Lu, Y.Q.; Wei, Z.C.; Liu, H.X.; Gao, M.S. Solar Greenhouse Temperature Prediction Model Based on 1D CNN-GRU. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2023, 54, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Faruk, D.Ö. A hybrid neural network and ARIMA model for water quality time series prediction. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2010, 23, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Júnior, D.; de Oliveira, J.; de Mattos, N. An intelligent hybridization of ARIMA with machine learning models for time series forecasting. Knowl.-Based Syst. 2019, 175, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Tian, D.; Wei, X.H.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, A.P.; Mu, W.S.; Feng, J.Y. Prediction of temperature in edible fungi greenhouse based on MA-ARIMA-GASVR. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Zou, W.; Yao, F.; Zhang, B.; He, C.; Guan, Z. Verification and predicting temperature and humidity in a solar greenhouse based on convex bidirectional extreme learning machine algorithm. Neurocomputing 2017, 249, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Zhao, H.; Shi, L.R.; Wang, H.J. Sunlight greenhouse temperature prediction model based on Bayesian regularization BP neural network. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015, 740, 871–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Gharghory, S.M. Deep network based on long short-term memory for time series prediction of microclimate data inside the greenhouse. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Appl. 2020, 19, 2050013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Liu, Y.; Li, D.; Wan, S.; Wang, F.; Dou, W.; Xu, X.; Li, S.; Ma, R.; Qi, L. A long short-term memory-based model for greenhouse climate prediction. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 2022, 37, 135–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Methodology for constructing the temperature and humidity environmental model for cuttings.
Figure 1. Methodology for constructing the temperature and humidity environmental model for cuttings.
Agronomy 14 00058 g001
Figure 2. Rooting process of apple rootstock cuttings.
Figure 2. Rooting process of apple rootstock cuttings.
Agronomy 14 00058 g002
Figure 3. Physiological activities of cuttings.
Figure 3. Physiological activities of cuttings.
Agronomy 14 00058 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the environment required for cuttings.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the environment required for cuttings.
Agronomy 14 00058 g004
Figure 5. Temperature control device of air environment in facility agricultural system. ((a) water curtain; (b) negative pressure fan; (c) finned radiators; (d) hot blast stove).
Figure 5. Temperature control device of air environment in facility agricultural system. ((a) water curtain; (b) negative pressure fan; (c) finned radiators; (d) hot blast stove).
Agronomy 14 00058 g005
Figure 6. Types of common cutting substrates [127]. ((a) river sand; (b) perlite; (c) Peat; (d) Vermiculite; (e) peanut shells; (f) Coconut chaff).
Figure 6. Types of common cutting substrates [127]. ((a) river sand; (b) perlite; (c) Peat; (d) Vermiculite; (e) peanut shells; (f) Coconut chaff).
Agronomy 14 00058 g006
Figure 7. Temperature control equipment for substrate environment in facility agriculture system. ((a) buried pipe [130]; (b) geothermal filaments [131]; (c) Thermostatic master plate structure diagram [132]).
Figure 7. Temperature control equipment for substrate environment in facility agriculture system. ((a) buried pipe [130]; (b) geothermal filaments [131]; (c) Thermostatic master plate structure diagram [132]).
Agronomy 14 00058 g007
Figure 8. Relationship of factors affecting air ambient humidity.
Figure 8. Relationship of factors affecting air ambient humidity.
Agronomy 14 00058 g008
Figure 9. Different wetting modes [151].
Figure 9. Different wetting modes [151].
Agronomy 14 00058 g009
Figure 10. Phase diagram of plant epidermal hydrophobicity and droplet impact velocity [152].
Figure 10. Phase diagram of plant epidermal hydrophobicity and droplet impact velocity [152].
Agronomy 14 00058 g010
Figure 11. Morphological changes of dry surface impacted by droplets [153] ((a) deposition; (b) rapid splashing; (c) crown spatter; (d) shrinkage spatter; (e) partial rebound; (f) full rebound).
Figure 11. Morphological changes of dry surface impacted by droplets [153] ((a) deposition; (b) rapid splashing; (c) crown spatter; (d) shrinkage spatter; (e) partial rebound; (f) full rebound).
Agronomy 14 00058 g011
Figure 12. Substrate watering equipment in facility agriculture system ((a) drip irrigation pipe; (b) drip irrigation tape; (c) insertion drip irrigation; (d) spray equipment).
Figure 12. Substrate watering equipment in facility agriculture system ((a) drip irrigation pipe; (b) drip irrigation tape; (c) insertion drip irrigation; (d) spray equipment).
Agronomy 14 00058 g012aAgronomy 14 00058 g012b
Figure 13. Substrate with different wet volume ((a) dry substrate; (b) semi-humid substrate; (c) wet substrate).
Figure 13. Substrate with different wet volume ((a) dry substrate; (b) semi-humid substrate; (c) wet substrate).
Agronomy 14 00058 g013
Figure 14. Comparison of mechanism model construction methods. ((a) Instruments used in mechanism model construction; (b) Construction basis of mechanism model; (c) Research objects of mechanism models; (d) Evaluation index of mechanism model).
Figure 14. Comparison of mechanism model construction methods. ((a) Instruments used in mechanism model construction; (b) Construction basis of mechanism model; (c) Research objects of mechanism models; (d) Evaluation index of mechanism model).
Agronomy 14 00058 g014
Figure 15. Comparison of data-driven model construction methods ((a) instruments used in data-driven model construction; (b) data-driven model construction method; (c) data-driven model research objects; (d) data-driven model evaluation indicators).
Figure 15. Comparison of data-driven model construction methods ((a) instruments used in data-driven model construction; (b) data-driven model construction method; (c) data-driven model research objects; (d) data-driven model evaluation indicators).
Agronomy 14 00058 g015
Table 2. Environmental parameters of cutting of apple rootstock shoots.
Table 2. Environmental parameters of cutting of apple rootstock shoots.
Growth StageCuttage 0–12 DaysCuttage 13–16 DaysCuttage 17–30 Days
Time5:00–19:0019:00–5:005:00–19:0019:00–5:005:00–19:0019:00–5:00
EnvironmentAirSubstrateAirSubstrateAirSubstrateAirSubstrateAirSubstrateAirSubstrate
Temperature (°C)222418202426161824261618
Table 3. Comparison of substrate heat transfer characteristics [127,128,129].
Table 3. Comparison of substrate heat transfer characteristics [127,128,129].
Substrate MaterialHeat Conductivity (W/(m·K))Density (g/cm3)Calorific Capacity
(J/(g·K))
Thermal Diffusivity
(mm²/s)
River Sand0.2–1.51.4–2.70.8–1.20.1–1.0
Perlite0.06–0.20.8–2.90.8–1.20.1–1.0
Turfy Soil0.03–0.40.1–0.31.0–1.50.1–1.0
Vermiculite0.04–0.072.2–2.80.8–1.20.1–1.0
Rice Hull0.03–0.10.1–0.21.4–1.80.1–1.0
Redheart Soil0.2–1.51.2–1.80.8–1.50.1–1.0
Coconut Bran0.03–0.10.1–0.21.5–2.50.1–1.0
Table 4. Parameters of different spray forms [144,145,146].
Table 4. Parameters of different spray forms [144,145,146].
Spray FormDroplet Size (μm)Suspension Time
Aerosol Spray1–10Long
Mist Spray10–100Comparatively Long
Spray Drift100–1000Comparatively Short
Drift Spray1000–100,000Short
Table 5. Parameter comparison of substrate particle size characteristic.
Table 5. Parameter comparison of substrate particle size characteristic.
Substrate MaterialSizeParticle Size (mm)Water-Holding CapacityWater Discharge CapacityReference
River SandGravel>2 mmRelatively WeakRelatively Strong[174,175,176,177]
Coarse Sand0.25–2
Medium Sand0.12–0.25
Fine Sand0.06–0.125
Very Sine Sand0.03–0.06
PerliteCoarse Particle2.12–5.38Relatively GoodRelatively Weak [178,179]
Medium Particle0.51–2.01
Fine Particle0.13–0.52
PeatCoarse Particle2.21–5.32GoodWeak[180,181]
Medium Particle0.53–2.23
Fine Particle0.14–0.48
VermiculiteCoarse Particle2.09–5.22Relatively Good Relatively Weak [182,183,184]
Medium Particle0.52–2.01
Fine Particle0.13–0.53
Peanut ShellCoarse Particle2.17–5.32GoodWeak[185,186]
Medium Particle0.48–2.01
Fine Particle0.11–0.51
Coconut ChaffCoarse Particle2.24–5.13GoodWeak[187,188]
Medium Particle0.53–2.02
Fine Particle0.12–0.52
Table 6. Studies on environmental mechanism models.
Table 6. Studies on environmental mechanism models.
ModelConstruction PrincipleInstrumentStudy SubjectsKey Influence FactorModel TypeEvaluation IndexReferences
Air Exchange Rate ModelConservation of Energy, Conservation of MassMatlabTemperature, HumidityVentilation Flow Rate, Evaporation Rate, Atomized Water Volume, Air Heat CapacityNonlinearityAverage Error (MAE)Pasgianos [196]
Plastic Tunnel Greenhouse Climate and Crop Heat ExchangeConservation of Energy, Conservation of MassCFDTemperature, HumiditySolar Radiation Intensity, Transpiration, Ventilation SpeedNonlinearityAverage Error (MAE)Boulard [197]
Climate Distribution Model in GreenhouseConservation of Energy, Conservation of MassCFDTemperatureVentilation Flow, Intake Temperature, Intake SpeedNonlinearityAverage Error (MAE)Liu [198]
Summer Greenhouse Cooling Simulation ModelConservation of Energy, Conservation of Momentum, Conservation of MassCFDTemperatureSolar Radiation Intensity, Crop Physiological Activity, Wind Speed, Wet Curtain Area, Greenhouse LengthNonlinearityAverage Error (MAE), Relative error (MRE), Maximum Absolute Error (MaxE)Xu [199]
Microclimate Model of Gable GreenhouseConservation of Energy, Conservation of Mass CFDTemperature, HumiditySolar Radiation Intensity, Ventilation Wind Speed, Ventilation DirectionNonlinearityRoot-Mean-Square Error (RMSE)Saberian [200]
Greenhouse Temperature Prediction Model Under Natural VentilationConservation of Energy, Conservation of Momentum, Conservation of MassMatlabTemperatureCrop Leaf Surface Temperature, Indoor Air Temperature, Soil TemperatureNonlinearityDetermination Coefficient (R2), Standard Deviation ( σ ) Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE) Model Efficiency ( η e f f )Singh [201]
Spatial and Temporal Variation Characteristic Factor Optimization Model of Greenhouse EnvironmentConservation of Energy, Conservation of MassCFDTemperature, Humidity, Energy ConsumptionSoil Temperature, Soil Density, Air Density, Indoor Air Temperature, Greenhouse Roof Temperature, Wind SpeedNonlinearityMaximum Relative Error (MaxRE), Average Relative Error (ARE), Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE)Li [202]
Temperature and Water Vapor Distribution Model in Glass GreenhouseConservation of Energy, Conservation of MassCFDTemperature, HumidityCrop Leaf Area, Solar Radiation Intensity, Plant Cover Temperature, Photosynthesis, Respiration, Transpiration Heat, Water Vapor VolumeNonlinearityRoot-Mean-Square Error (RMSE)Boulard [203]
Greenhouse Thermal Storage Rear Wall ModelConservation of Energy, Conservation of MassCFDTemperatureWall Temperature, Hot Air Duct Temperature, Length of Hot Air DuctNonlinearityAbsolute Error(AE), Average Error (MAE), Average Relative Error (ARE), Maximum Relative Error (MaxRE)Zhang [204]
Table 7. Research on environmental data-driven model.
Table 7. Research on environmental data-driven model.
ModelTypeInstrumentStudy SubjectsKey Influence FactorModel TypeEvaluation IndexReferences
Temperature Prediction ModelStatistical Regression MethodMatlab, Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LSSVM), Intelligent Particle Swarm Optimization (IPSO)TemperatureAir Temperature, Air humidity, Soil Temperature, Soil moisture, Solar Radiation Intensity, Outdoor TemperatureNonlinearityMean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Percentage Error (MAPE), Mean Square Error (MSE)Yu [207]
Temperature Prediction SystemNeural NetworkTime Sequence Forecast Model (ARMA)TemperatureAir Temperature, Air humidity, Light IntensityNonlinearityMaximum Absolute Error (MaxAE), Maximum Relative Error (MaxRE), Mean Relative Error (MRE)Ren [208]
Solar Greenhouse Temperature Prediction ModelNeural NetworkModel Predictive Control (MPC), Nonlinear Autoregressive Exogenous Model (NRAX)TemperatureWind Speed of Fan, Wet Curtain State, Solar Radiation Intensity, Air HumidityNonlinearityMean error (ME)Du [209]
Velon Greenhouse Climate Prediction ModelNeural NetworkArtificial Neural Network (ANN), Nonlinear Autoregressive Exogenous Model (NRAX), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory Network (LSTM)Temperature, HumidityAir humidity, air Temperature, CO2 ConcentrationNonlinearityMean error (ME), Root-Mean-Square Error Prediction (RMSEP), Standard Error Prediction (SEP), Determination Coefficient (R2)Jung [210]
Agricultural Low Temperature Prediction ModelNeural NetworkLong short-term memory network (LSTM)TemperatureAir Temperature, Air humidity, Wind SpeedNonlinearityRoot-Mean-Square Error (RMSE), Determination Coefficient (R2), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient (PCC),
Error Percentage
Guillén-Navarro M Á [211]
Solar Greenhouse Temperature Prediction ModelNeural NetworkOne-Dimensional Neural Network, Gated Cycle Unit (GRU), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)TemperatureLight Intensity, Indoor Soil Temperature, Outdoor Soil Temperature, Outdoor Air Temperature, Outdoor soil Moisture Content, Outdoor CO2 ConcentrationNonlinearityDetermination Coefficient (R2), Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Maximum Absolute Error (MaxAE), Average Relative Error (ARE)Hu [212]
Prediction of Greenhouse Temperature of Edible FungiStatistical Regression MethodMoving Average (MA), Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Model (ARIMA), Genetic Algorithm
(GA), Support Vector Regression (SVR)
TemperatureMoving Average Window Length, Indoor Temperature at 3 o’ clockNonlinearityMean Relative Error (MAE), Mean Square Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE)Tian [215]
Solar Greenhouse Temperature and Humidity Prediction ModelStatistical Regression MethodConvex Bidirectional Extremum Learning Machine (CB-ELM)Temperature, HumiditySolar Radiation Intensity, Wind speed, Outdoor Temperature, Outdoor HumidityNonlinearityRoot-Mean-Square Error (RMSE), Model ValidityZou [216]
Solar Greenhouse Temperature Prediction ModelNeural NetworkBackpropagation Neural Network (BP)TemperatureIndoor Temperature, Indoor Humidity, Indoor Light IntensityNonlinearityMean Absolute Error (MAE), Mean Relative Error (MRE), Maximum Absolute Error (MaxAE)Zhao [217]
Table 8. Comparison between mechanism model and data-driven model.
Table 8. Comparison between mechanism model and data-driven model.
ModelMechanism ModelData-Driven Model
Common pointThe main research objects are ambient temperature and humidity, among which temperature accounts for more. All models are nonlinear models. They are predictive.
AdvantagesA process-oriented visual description of the space–time change of matterFast induction of input/output relationships for high dimensional data
DisadvantagesThe boundary conditions need to be tested in practiceThe quality of training data is high and the amount of feature data is large
Individualized improvement planThe boundary conditions that are difficult to measure are derived by using deep learning methodsThe mechanism model is used to screen the influential factors and reduce the dimension of the input data
Common improvement planThe content and distribution of plant hormones were used as important parameters to analyze the intensity of plant physiological activities. They should be important parameters for constructing environmental models.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Xie, J.; Wang, X.; Gu, H.; Li, J.; Liu, H.; Wang, P.; Yang, X. Research Status and Prospects on the Construction Methods of Temperature and Humidity Environmental Models in Arbor Tree Cuttage. Agronomy 2024, 14, 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010058

AMA Style

Wang X, Liu L, Xie J, Wang X, Gu H, Li J, Liu H, Wang P, Yang X. Research Status and Prospects on the Construction Methods of Temperature and Humidity Environmental Models in Arbor Tree Cuttage. Agronomy. 2024; 14(1):58. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xu, Lixing Liu, Jinyan Xie, Xiaosa Wang, Haoyuan Gu, Jianping Li, Hongjie Liu, Pengfei Wang, and Xin Yang. 2024. "Research Status and Prospects on the Construction Methods of Temperature and Humidity Environmental Models in Arbor Tree Cuttage" Agronomy 14, no. 1: 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14010058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop