Next Article in Journal
Chemical Profile, Elemental Composition, and Antimicrobial Activity of Plants of the Teucrium (Lamiaceae) Genus Growing in Moldova
Previous Article in Journal
Miscanthus × giganteus Phytoremediation of Soil Contaminated with Trace Elements as Influenced by the Presence of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Yield and Nutrient Concentrations of Kohlrabi Bulbs and Leaves as Affected by Spring Transplanting Dates

by
Alexandra Smychkovich
* and
Masoud Hashemi
Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 161 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(4), 770; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040770
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 16 March 2022 / Accepted: 20 March 2022 / Published: 23 March 2022

Abstract

:
Transplanting kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes), a cool-season vegetable crop, in early spring may provide the opportunity for double cropping in short-season regions such as the Northeastern United States. A two-year field study evaluated the impacts of transplanting dates on yield and nutrient concentration of kohlrabi. Additionally, this study aimed to quantify the nutritional value of kohlrabi leaves. The yield of kohlrabi increased by as much as 307 kg ha−1 for each day transplanting was delayed. Soil temperature increased by 2.8 °C between April 23 and May 14, resulting in the increased accumulation of Ca, Cu, Mn, and Fe in kohlrabi bulbs and Ca and Cu in leaves. The nutrient concentration in leaf and bulb were positively correlated, indicating that the two commodities can be simultaneously harvested for optimum quality. Leaf yield was not significantly different among transplanting dates. However, the number of leaves and total leaf area increased with delayed transplanting. Leaf yield and leaf area were not correlated with bulb yield, suggesting that the reductions in yield and nutrient concentrations were unrelated to photosynthetic efficiency. Although the earlier transplanting of kohlrabi may have provided opportunities for double cropping, the yield and nutrient accumulation of kohlrabi transplanted early in the spring were considerably compromised.

1. Introduction

Kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes) is a cool-season, biennial vegetable revered for its mildly sweet flavor and many health benefits. Kohlrabi is known by many names around the world and is cultivated as an annual crop in many parts of Europe, Asia, and North America. Like other cruciferous vegetables, kohlrabi is a potent source of essential nutrients and bioactive compounds produced by plant secondary metabolites [1,2]. The regular consumption of kohlrabi can aid in reducing the risk of chronic disease, depressive disorders, and many types of cancer [2,3,4,5].
Kohlrabi is primarily cultivated for its round, thickened stem, often referred to as the ‘bulb’, which resembles a turnip at maturity. Cultivars can be white, pale green, or purple and differ significantly in size and storage ability. Fresh market spring varieties are typically harvested when bulb diameter reaches 6–7 cm, while fall storage varieties can reach up to 20 cm in diameter by the time they are harvested and be stored for up to four months in proper conditions. The bulbs, similar to radish in consistency but slightly sweeter in taste, can be cooked, pickled, or consumed raw in salads [1]. The flavorful leaves of kohlrabi, comparable to kale in appearance and texture, are also highly nutritious and can provide an additional commodity to growers and consumers.
Secondary metabolites found in kohlrabi, including anthocyanins, phenolic compounds, and glucosinolates contribute to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties [4,6]. Unlike pale green varieties, purple kohlrabi cultivars contain anthocyanins, bioactive flavonoids important for human health, as well as higher concentrations of phenolic compounds resulting in greater anti-inflammatory and antidiabetic effects [7,8,9]. While the majority of research has focused on the health benefits of kohlrabi bulbs, the antibacterial and antioxidant potential of kohlrabi leaves have also been documented [10,11]. More recently, kohlrabi sprouts have been found to contain high concentrations of bioactive compounds, including glucosinolates and fatty acids [12].
In northern climates, kohlrabi can be planted in the spring as a fresh market crop or in late summer for fall harvest and winter storage. Seedlings are typically started in the greenhouse and transplanted into the field after 4–5 weeks [13]. The impacts of plant spacing, variety selection, and fertilizer application rates on growth, yield, and quality parameters of kohlrabi have been extensively studied [14,15,16,17,18]. However, the optimum time for transplanting kohlrabi, specifically in the Northern United States, has not been reported. It is well-established that the date of planting can significantly impact crop yield [19,20,21,22,23,24]. The growing season in the Northeastern United States is relatively short; therefore, identifying cold-tolerant crops for early spring planting can extend the growing season and provide an opportunity for double cropping. Although kohlrabi growing guidelines were recently added to the New England Vegetable Management Guide (the primary vegetable crop reference in the Northeast), the optimum time for spring transplanting has not been specified. Thus, it is necessary to evaluate the impacts of the spring transplanting date on the yield and quality of kohlrabi in order to optimize land use efficiency and crop productivity. Kohlrabi is a cool-season vegetable, and we hypothesized that the early spring planting of kohlrabi may result in earlier harvest, thus extending the growing season by several weeks.
The goals of this study were to (1) evaluate the impacts of spring transplanting dates on kohlrabi yield and nutrient accumulation in its bulbs, and (2) assess the nutritional value of kohlrabi leaves as an additional commodity by comparing their nutrient content to kale (Brassica oleracea var. sabellica), a popular fresh leafy vegetable.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Site and Weather Conditions

A two-year field experiment (2020–2021) was conducted at the University of Massachusetts Crop, Animal, Research, and Education Center, located in South Deerfield, MA, USA (42° N, 73° W). The soil at this location is characterized as a coarse–silty, mixed, non-acid, mesic Typic Udifluvent (Hadley series). In both years, a composite soil sample was taken at a depth of 15 cm from the field site to ensure that P, K, Ca, and Mg levels were in the optimum range for kohlrabi production. Relevant weather conditions, including annual precipitation and growing degree days during the experiment period and the norm for the experimental site, are presented in the results section.

2.2. Field Experiment Design and Implementation

Four spring dates of transplanting (DOT) were evaluated in this experiment: 23/4, 30/4, 07/5, and 14/5. Experimental plots were laid out in a randomized complete block design with four replications. An early white variety of kohlrabi, Beas, was seeded into plastic trays and transplanted after four weeks in the greenhouse into heavyweight, organic, certified paper mulch (Figure 1). Plants were spaced 15 cm apart, with 30 cm spacing between the rows. All plots were irrigated throughout the season using drip irrigation. Rows of kohlrabi were covered with heavyweight, transparent row cover at the time of planting to prevent insect damage. 180 kg ha−1 of N fertilizer was applied in the form of urea ammonium nitrate (UAN, 32%) as a split application, with all plots receiving 112 kg ha−1 at the time of planting and the remainder receiving 112 kg ha−1 two weeks later.

2.3. Data Collection

Kohlrabi plants were harvested when 50% of the bulbs in each DOT treatment reached 6.4 cm in diameter. Yield was determined by measuring the fresh leaf and bulb weight (kg) of ten randomly chosen plants per plot immediately after harvest. Two plants from each plot were randomly selected for further analysis. Leaves were removed from bulbs, and fresh weight of bulbs and leaves were separately determined. The leaf area (cm2) of each plant was measured using a LI-3100C Area Meter (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Total leaf area was calculated by adding the areas of all leaves per plant. Leaf and bulb samples were dried in a forced air oven at 109 °C until they maintained a constant weight. Moisture content of leaves and bulbs was calculated by subtracting the dry weight value from the fresh weight.

2.4. Nutrient Analysis

The nutrient content of kohlrabi bulbs was determined using a dry ashing procedure. Dried bulb and leaf tissue samples were ground in a stainless steel container using a Vitamix 5200 high-power blender to pass through a 20-mesh sieve (Dual Manufacturing Company, Inc., Franklin Park, IL, USA) and homogenized. An amount of 0.2 g of the powdered samples were weighed into porcelain crucibles and placed into a combustion oven at a temperature of 500 °C for 6 hours. Afterwards, the crucibles were allowed to cool to room temperature and 15 ml of 10% HCl was added to each sample. The resulting mixture was filtered through Whatman #2 filter paper. Finally, the Cu, Mn, Fe, Ca, K, and Mg concentrations of each sample were quantified using microwave plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (4210 MP-AES, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the GLM and CORR procedures in SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The two experimental years were combined for analysis, resulting in eight total replications. Effects that were significant at the p < 0.05 level were fitted to regression curves.

3. Results

3.1. Statistical Analysis

The analysis of variance results for bulb yield and nutrient content as affected by the date of transplanting are shown in Table 1. The analysis of variance results for leaf yield, total leaf area, leaf number, and leaf nutrient content as affected by the date of transplanting are shown in Table 2.

3.2. Weather Conditions

Growing degree days (GDD) and total precipitation during the growing periods in 2020 and 2021 are presented in Table 3, alongside twenty-year averages (2000–2020) to represent the regional norm. The presented norm values were obtained from the Orange Municipal Airport weather station in Orange, MA, USA, approximately 32 km from the experimental site.
Overall, the 2021 growing season was hotter and wetter than 2020 and the 20-year norm for the experimental site. As a result, plants were harvested approximately two weeks earlier than in 2020. The seeding, transplanting, and harvesting dates for both growing seasons are presented in Table 4.
Soil temperature at the time of transplanting is presented in Table 5. In 2021, the soil temperature at DOT 4 was 1.1 °C warmer than DOT 2 and DOT 3, and 2.8 °C warmer than the first date of transplanting.

3.3. Bulb and Leaf Yield

The date of transplanting had significant effects on both the total yield and bulb yield of kohlrabi. However, leaf yield was not statistically significantly different among DOT. Bulb yield, and consequently total yield, increased with later transplanting. Kohlrabi transplanted on 14 May produced the highest bulb yields, equal to 20,297 kg ha−1 (Table 4 and Figure 2).

3.4. Leaf Number and Total Leaf Area

The date of transplanting had a significant effect on the average number of leaves per plant, as well as the total leaf area and the cumulative area of all leaves per plant (Figure 3). While the number of leaves increased as DOT was delayed, the total leaf area demonstrated a parabolic response and reached its highest value in DOT 3 (7 May). Correlations between bulb yield, leaf yield, leaf area, and leaf number are presented in Table 6.

3.5. Nutrient Concentration

The date of transplanting significantly impacted kohlrabi nutrient concentrations, including the Mn, Fe, Cu, and Ca in bulbs, as well as Ca and Mn concentrations in leaves. The mean concentrations of nutrients in kohlrabi bulbs and leaves for each DOT are shown in Table 7. Among the measured nutrients, Mg and K concentrations in both bulbs and leaves were not affected by DOT. For all other nutrients in which DOT had a significant effect, higher concentrations were detected in the later DOTs. Correlations among the nutrients in bulbs and leaves are presented in Table 8.

4. Discussion

The growing season in the Northeastern United States is relatively short, resulting in limited opportunities for double cropping. As a cool-season vegetable crop, kohlrabi can potentially be planted as early as the beginning of April, making it a promising candidate for double cropping. This study evaluated the impacts of spring transplanting dates on the yield and nutrient concentration of kohlrabi bulbs and leaves. Higher yields and nutrient concentrations were observed in kohlrabi transplanted in May rather than in April. Earlier spring transplanting allowed for an earlier kohlrabi harvest but resulted in a considerable yield penalty. Averaging two growing seasons, we found bulb yield increased by 307 kg ha−1 for each day that transplanting was delayed, beginning 23 April. This delay in transplanting also resulted in a greater accumulation of nutrients in both the bulbs and leaves of kohlrabi. Among the measured nutrients, the accumulation of Ca, Cu, Fe, and Mn in bulbs, as well as Ca and Mn in leaves, increased with the delay in transplanting time.
Although the number of leaves per plant increased with the time of transplanting, the total leaf area was highest in the two intermediate transplanting dates: 30 April and 7 May. Leaf yield was not significantly different among transplanting dates and showed no significant correlation with leaf number. This suggests that, although there are more kohlrabi leaves per plant at later dates of transplanting, they are generally smaller and lighter than the leaves of those transplanted earlier in the spring. The number of leaves showed a moderate correlation with bulb yield, suggesting that leaf position may play a greater role in photosynthetic efficiency than the total leaf area.
Lower yields and nutrient concentrations of kohlrabi transplanted earlier in the spring can likely be explained, at least in part, by cooler soil temperatures in earlier DOTs (Table 3). Low root zone temperatures have been shown to negatively impact yield, growth rate, and nutrient accumulation in vegetable crops, including cucumber, red leaf lettuce, tomato, and several brassica species [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Chinese broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra) grown at 10 °C root zone temperature, as compared to 20 °C, resulted in a 26% reduction in yield and accumulated less K, Ca, and Mg in the leaves [30].
It has been well-documented that low soil temperatures reduce water absorption by crop roots and hinder plant growth by limiting respiration, and thus, the metabolic activity of root cells [31,32,33,34]. However, the specific mechanisms by which low soil temperature impacts plant physiology vary by crop species. In red leaf lettuce, decreased root oxygen consumption caused by low root zone temperatures (10 °C) led to oxidative stress in the leaves, resulting in reduced final yield [20]. Low root zone temperatures have been shown to cause damage to photosystem II in African snake tomato, resulting in photochemical inhibition and a decreasing net photosynthetic efficiency [35]. By contrast, root zone temperature has been shown to have no direct effect on the photosynthesis of Brassica rapa, despite negatively impacting crop growth rate and biomass accumulation [36,37,38]. The negative impacts of low root zone temperatures on Brassica species can likely be explained by a decreased nitrate uptake efficiency, and water and solute flow rates through the roots [31,39]. In the present study, neither kohlrabi leaf yield nor leaf area were significantly correlated with bulb yield, indicating that photosynthetic efficiency was sufficient across all transplanting dates. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in specific leaf area among transplanting dates, further suggesting that the reductions in yield and nutrient concentrations in earlier transplanting dates were unrelated to photosynthetic efficiency.
Although kohlrabi is primarily grown for its enlarged, rounded stems, the leaves of kohlrabi can provide an additional commodity to growers, reduce processing labor, and increase the variety of nutrient-dense leafy greens available to consumers. Table 9 demonstrates a comparison between the nutrient content of fresh kohlrabi leaves and those of kale, which are comparable in taste and texture.
As shown in Table 9, the concentrations of macro minerals (Ca, Mg, K) are higher in kohlrabi leaves, with the concentrations of Ca and Mg over 1.5 times higher than the concentrations found in those of kale. By contrast, kale leaves are generally richer in micronutrients than kohlrabi leaves. These findings suggest that kohlrabi leaves can be consumed as a rich edible source of nutrients and provide an additional commodity to growers who may wish to market both the bulbs and fresh leaves of kohlrabi. Except for Fe, a highly immobile nutrient, concentrations of nutrients in bulbs and leaves were positively correlated, suggesting that nutrients acquired by the plant are consistently distributed throughout the plant and that higher kohlrabi bulb nutrient concentrations correspond to higher nutrient concentrations in the leaves. Therefore, the optimum time of harvest is the same for leaves and bulbs, allowing them to be simultaneously harvested and marketed.

5. Conclusions

The results of the current study revealed that although the early transplanting of kohlrabi provides an opportunity for earlier harvest, and thus double cropping, this advantage comes with significant reductions in the yield and nutritional value of both bulbs and leaves. Therefore, in northern climates, transplanting kohlrabi in May rather than April optimizes crop yield and quality. Further research is needed to better understand the exact mechanisms by which kohlrabi yield responds to a low soil temperature in early DOTs. Additionally, this study confirmed kohlrabi leaves to be a promising fresh market commodity by comparing their nutrient content with related brassica leaves such as kale, a popular leafy vegetable known for its health benefits.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S. and M.H.; methodology, A.S. and M.H.; validation, A.S.; formal analysis, A.S.; investigation, A.S.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, M.H.; visualization, A.S.; supervision, M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Center for Agriculture, Food, and the Environment for all their support, including graduate and undergraduate summer research funding. The authors would also like to acknowledge Olivia Larrivee for technical assistance. The success of the project was dependent on the field support of the Crop and Animal Research Center crew, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Choi, S.-H.; Ryu, D.-K.; Park, S.-H.; Ahn, K.-G.; Lim, Y.-P.; An, G.-H. Composition analysis between kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes) and radish (Raphanus sativus). Hortic. Sci. Technol. 2010, 28, 469–475. [Google Scholar]
  2. Manchali, S.; Murthy, K.N.C.; Patil, B. Crucial facts about health benefits of popular cruciferous vegetables. J. Funct. Foods 2012, 4, 94–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Di Noia, J. Defining Powerhouse Fruits and Vegetables: A Nutrient Density Approach. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2014, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Higdon, J.V.; Delage, B.; Williams, D.E.; Dashwood, R.H. Cruciferous vegetables and human cancer risk: Epidemiologic evidence and mechanistic basis. Pharmacol. Res. 2007, 55, 224–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. LaChance, L.R.; Ramsey, D. Antidepressant foods: An evidence-based nutrient profiling system for depression. World J. Psychiatry 2018, 8, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Park, W.T.; Kim, J.K.; Park, S.; Lee, S.-W.; Li, X.; Kim, Y.B.; Uddin, M.R.; Park, N.I.; Kim, S.-J.; Park, S.U. Metabolic Profiling of Glucosinolates, Anthocyanins, Carotenoids, and Other Secondary Metabolites in Kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 8111–8116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jung, H.A.; Karki, S.; Ehom, N.-Y.; Yoon, M.-H.; Kim, E.J.; Choi, J.S. Anti-Diabetic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Green and Red Kohlrabi Cultivars (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes). Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2014, 19, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Park, C.H.; Yeo, H.J.; Kim, N.S.; Eun, P.Y.; Kim, S.-J.; Arasu, M.V.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Park, S.-Y.; Kim, J.K.; Park, S.U. Metabolic profiling of pale green and purple kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes). Appl. Biol. Chem. 2017, 60, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wieczorek, M.N.; Jeleń, H.H. Volatile Compounds of Selected Raw and Cooked Brassica Vegetables. Molecules 2019, 24, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ben Sassi, A.; Ascrizzi, R.; Chiboub, W.; Cheikh Mhamed, A.; ElAyeb, A.; Skhiri, F.; Tounsi Saidani, M.; Mastouri, M.; Flamini, G. Volatiles, phenolic compounds, antioxidant and antibacterial properties of kohlrabi leaves. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yagar, H.; Isbilir, S.S.; Akagun, G. Antioxidant Activity of Kohlrabi Leaf and Tuber. J. Agric. Life Sci. 2016, 3, 55–65. [Google Scholar]
  12. Paśko, P.; Galanty, A.; Tyszka-Czochara, M.; Żmudzki, P.; Zagrodzki, P.; Gdula-Argasińska, J.; Prochownik, E.; Gorinstein, S. Health Promoting vs Anti-nutritive Aspects of Kohlrabi Sprouts, a Promising Candidate for Novel Functional Food. Mater. Veg. 2021, 76, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Baudoin, W.; Nersisyan, A.; Shamilov, A.; Hodder, A.; Gutierrez, D.; Pascale, S.D.; Nicola, S.; Gruda, N.; Urban, L.; Tanny, J. Good Agricultural Practices for Greenhouse Vegetable Production in the South East European Countries: Principles for Sustainable Intensification of Smallholder Farms; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2017; pp. 403–424. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hange, P.R.; Barkule, S.R.; Lohakare, A.S.; Thalkari, G.N. Effect of different levels of chemical fertilizers and spacings on yield and quality of knol-khol (Brassica oleracea Var. gongylodes L.). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2020, 9, 1638–1641. [Google Scholar]
  15. Meena, M.L.; Shivran, B.C.; Meena, R.K.; Singh, G.P. Horticultural Traits of Knolkhol (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes L.) Influenced as Varieties and Spacing. J. Pharm. Innov. 2021, 10, 244–246. [Google Scholar]
  16. Shams, A.S. Effect of mineral, organic and bio-fertilizers on growth, yield, quality and sensory evaluation of Kohlrabi. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 2012, 8, 305–314. [Google Scholar]
  17. Silatar, P.; Patel, G.S.; Acharya, S.K.; Vadodaria, J.R. Performance of different varieties and plant spacing on growth and yield of knolkhol (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes). Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 8, 1476–1479. [Google Scholar]
  18. Uddin, J.; Solaiman, A.H.M.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Plant Characters and Yield of Kohlrabi (Brassica oleraceae var. gongylodes) as Affected by Different Organic Manures. J. Hortic. Sci. Ornam. Plants 2009, 1, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  19. Subedi, K.D.; Ma, B.L.; Xue, A.G. Planting Date and Nitrogen Effects on Grain Yield and Protein Content of Spring Wheat. Crop Sci. 2007, 47, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Baum, M.E.; Archontoulis, S.V.; Licht, M.A. Planting Date, Hybrid Maturity, and Weather Effects on Maize Yield and Crop Stage. Agron. J. 2019, 111, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mourtzinis, S.; Gaspar, A.P.; Naeve, S.L.; Conley, S.P. Planting Date, Maturity, and Temperature Effects on Soybean Seed Yield and Composition. Agron. J. 2017, 109, 2040–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Begna, S.H.; Angadi, S.V. Effects of Planting Date on Winter Canola Growth and Yield in the Southwestern U.S. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hossain, I.; Epplin, F.M.; Krenzer, E.G. Planting Date Influence on Dual-Purpose Winter Wheat Forage Yield, Grain Yield, and Test Weight. Agron. J. 2003, 95, 1179–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. De La Vega, A.J.; Hall, A.J. Effects of Planting Date, Genotype, and Their Interactions on Sunflower Yield: I. Determinants of Oil-Corrected Grain Yield. Crop Sci. 2002, 42, 1191–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yan, Q.-Y.; Duan, Z.-Q.; Mao, J.-D.; Li, X.; Dong, F. Low Root Zone Temperature Limits Nutrient Effects on Cucumber Seedling Growth and Induces Adversity Physiological Response. J. Integr. Agric. 2013, 12, 1450–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sakamoto, M.; Suzuki, T. Effect of Root-Zone Temperature on Growth and Quality of Hydroponically Grown Red Leaf Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Red Wave). Am. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 2350–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bumgarner, N.R.; Scheerens, J.C.; Mullen, R.W.; Bennett, M.A.; Ling, P.P.; Kleinhenz, M.D. Root-zone temperature and nitrogen affect the yield and secondary metabolite concentration of fall- and spring-grown, high-density leaf lettuce: Root-zone temperature and nitrogen affect the yield and secondary metabolite. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tindall, J.A.; Mills, H.A.; Radcliffe, D.E. The effect of root zone temperature on nutrient uptake of tomato. J. Plant Nutr. 1990, 13, 939–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Díaz-Pérez, J.C. Root zone temperature, plant growth and yield of broccoli [Brassica oleracea (Plenck) var. italica] as affected by plastic film mulches. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 123, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, F.; Thiele, B.; Santhiraraja-Abresch, S.; Watt, M.; Kraska, T.; Ulbrich, A.; Kuhn, A.J. Effects of Root Temperature on the Plant Growth and Food Quality of Chinese Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. alboglabra Bailey). Agronomy 2020, 10, 702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Markhart, A.H.; Fiscus, E.L.; Naylor, A.W.; Kramer, P.J. Effect of Temperature on Water and Ion Transport in Soybean and Broccoli Systems. Plant Physiol. 1979, 64, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Equiza, M.A.; Miravé, J.P.; Tognetti, J.A. Morphological, Anatomical and Physiological Responses Related to Differential Shoot vs. Root Growth Inhibition at Low Temperature in Spring and Winter Wheat. Ann. Bot. 2001, 87, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Pahlavanian, A.M.; Silk, W.K. Effect of Temperature on Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Growth in the Primary Maize Root. Plant Physiol. 1988, 87, 529–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Aroca, R.; Tognoni, F.; Irigoyen, J.J.; Sánchez-Díaz, M.; Pardossi, A. Different root low temperature response of two maize genotypes differing in chilling sensitivity. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2001, 39, 1067–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Adebooye, O.C.; Schmitz-Eiberger, M.; Lankes, C.; Noga, G.J. Inhibitory effects of sub-optimal root zone temperature on leaf bioactive components, photosystem II (PS II) and minerals uptake in Trichosanthes cucumerina L. Cucurbitaceae. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2010, 32, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kleier, C.; Farnsworth, B.; Winner, W. Biomass, reproductive output, and physiological responses of rapid-cycling Brassica (Brassica rapa) to ozone and modified root temperature. New Phytol. 1998, 139, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cumbus, I.P.; Nye, P.H. Root Zone Temperature Effects on Growth and Nitrate Absorption in Rape (Brassica napus cv. Emerald). J. Exp. Bot. 1982, 33, 1138–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. MacDuff, J.H.; Hopper, M.J.; Wild, A. The Effect of Root Temperature on Growth and Uptake of Ammonium and Nitrate by Brassica napus L. cv. Bien venu in Flowing Solution Culture: II. Uptake from solutions containing NH4 NO3. J. Exp. Bot. 1987, 38, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bigot, J.; Boucaud, J. Short-term responses of Brassica rapa plants to low root temperature: Effects on nitrate uptake and its translocation to the shoot. Physiol. Plant. 1996, 96, 646–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Kohlrabi (var. Beas) transplanted into paper mulch for weed control. Kohlrabi was harvested when 50% of bulbs reached 6.4 cm.
Figure 1. Kohlrabi (var. Beas) transplanted into paper mulch for weed control. Kohlrabi was harvested when 50% of bulbs reached 6.4 cm.
Agronomy 12 00770 g001
Figure 2. The influence of date of transplanting on kohlrabi bulb and total (bulb and leaf) yield; DOT = date of transplanting.
Figure 2. The influence of date of transplanting on kohlrabi bulb and total (bulb and leaf) yield; DOT = date of transplanting.
Agronomy 12 00770 g002
Figure 3. (a) Number of leaves and (b) total leaf area of kohlrabi influenced by date of transplanting; DOT = date of transplanting.
Figure 3. (a) Number of leaves and (b) total leaf area of kohlrabi influenced by date of transplanting; DOT = date of transplanting.
Agronomy 12 00770 g003
Table 1. Analysis of variance results for yield and nutrient content of kohlrabi bulbs, as affected by date of transplanting.
Table 1. Analysis of variance results for yield and nutrient content of kohlrabi bulbs, as affected by date of transplanting.
YieldNutrient
CuMnFeCaKMg
DOT<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.00260.01180.12360.1150
DOT = date of transplanting.
Table 2. Analysis of variance results for yield, leaf number, total leaf area and nutrient content of kohlrabi leaves, as affected by date of transplanting.
Table 2. Analysis of variance results for yield, leaf number, total leaf area and nutrient content of kohlrabi leaves, as affected by date of transplanting.
YieldLeaf NumberLeaf AreaNutrient
CuMnFeCaKMg
DOT0.10560.00070.00830.13110.01040.12160.01960.94950.2386
DOT = date of transplanting.
Table 3. Weather conditions and 20-year norm at the experimental site.
Table 3. Weather conditions and 20-year norm at the experimental site.
GDD (Base 4.4 °C)Precipitation (cm)
20202021Norm20202021Norm
23–30 April4681624.15.42.2
May5565704935.611.88.0
June8709557334.45.511.7
1–13 July461--3682.6--3.1
Total19331606165616.722.725
Norm values were calculated based on monthly averages measured at the Orange Municipal Airport weather station in Orange, MA, USA; GDD = growing degree days.
Table 4. Time of seeding, transplanting, and harvesting of kohlrabi during the two growing seasons.
Table 4. Time of seeding, transplanting, and harvesting of kohlrabi during the two growing seasons.
20202021
SeededTransplantedHarvestedDTHSeededTransplantedHarvestedDTH
DOT 125 March23 April22 June6025 March23 April21 June59
DOT 24 April30 April22 June534 April30 April21 June52
DOT 314 April7 May1 July5514 April7 May24 June48
DOT 424 April 14 May13 July6024 April15 May30 June47
DOT = date of transplanting; DTH = days to harvest.
Table 5. Regional soil temperatures for Deerfield, MA.
Table 5. Regional soil temperatures for Deerfield, MA.
Soil Temperature °C
DOT20215-Year Average10-Year Average
23/412.212.011.0
30/413.311.3 11.8
07/513.314.014.5
14/515.012.1113.9
DOT = date of transplanting.
Table 6. Pearson correlation matrix of bulb yield, leaf yield, leaf area and leaf number. Results represent the averages of two growing seasons.
Table 6. Pearson correlation matrix of bulb yield, leaf yield, leaf area and leaf number. Results represent the averages of two growing seasons.
Leaf YieldLeaf AreaLeaf Number
Bulb Yield−0.016 ns0.047 ns0.470 **
Leaf Yield 0.560 ***0.310 ns
Leaf Area 0.653 ***
**, *** Significant at the 0.01 and 0.001 probability levels, respectively; ns = non-significant.
Table 7. The influence of DOT on nutrient concentrations of kohlrabi bulbs and leaves.
Table 7. The influence of DOT on nutrient concentrations of kohlrabi bulbs and leaves.
Bulb Nutrient Concentration mg g−1Leaf Nutrient Concentration mg g−1
DOTCaKMgCuFeMnCaKMgCuFeMn
23/47.13655.0982.4500.0040.0330.01132.21632.6823.2840.0050.0680.033
30/47.27759.3112.5800.0050.0390.01330.86231.8033.5870.0050.0680.039
07/57.23356.0252.5680.0050.0430.01333.11532.8363.7200.0050.0610.043
14/57.99360.3672.8270.0060.0570.01635.59532.7293.6700.0050.0740.057
TrendL **NSNSL **L **C **L *NSNSNSNSL **
DOT = date of transplanting; L = linear, C = cubic; *, **, significant at the 0.05, and 0.01 probability level, respectively; ns = non-significant.
Table 8. Pearson correlation matrix of nutrients in bulbs and leaves of kohlrabi. Results represent the average of two growing seasons.
Table 8. Pearson correlation matrix of nutrients in bulbs and leaves of kohlrabi. Results represent the average of two growing seasons.
Bulb KBulb MgBulb CuBulb FeBulb MnLeaf CaLeaf KLeaf MgLeaf CuLeaf FeLeaf Mn
Bulb Ca0.725 ***0.786 ***0.636 ***0.562 ***0.403 *0.600 ***0.149 ns−0.007 ns0.565 ***0.040 ns−0.002 ns
Bulb K 0.733 ***0.381 *0.508 **0.196 ns0.416 *0.443 *−0.127 ns0.283 ns−0.121 ns−0.199 ns
Bulb Mg 0.640 ***0.405 *0.477 **0.550 **0.319 ns0.373 *0.457 **0.144 ns0.054 ns
Bulb Cu 0.620 ***0.664 ***0.488 **0.112 ns0.168 ns0.495 **0.041 ns0.041 ns
Bulb Fe 0.467 **0.388 *0.029 ns−0.217 ns0.237 ns0.202 ns0.192 ns
Bulb Mn 0.379 *−0.042 ns0.308 ns0.449 **0.297 ns0.605 ***
Leaf Ca 0.224 ns0.273 ns0.257 ns0.073 ns0.243 ns
Leaf K −0.082 ns0.221 ns−0.420 *−0.290 ns
Leaf Mg 0.263 ns0.236 ns0.276 ns
Leaf Cu 0.091 ns0.104 ns
Leaf Fe 0.485 **
*, **, *** Significant at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 probability level, respectively; ns = non-significant.
Table 9. Comparison of selected nutrient content of leaves of kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. sabellica) and kale (Brassica oleracea var. sabellica).
Table 9. Comparison of selected nutrient content of leaves of kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. sabellica) and kale (Brassica oleracea var. sabellica).
Leaf Nutrient Content (mg 100 g−1 Fresh Weight)
KohlrabiKale *
Ca427.00254.00
K393.00348.00
Mg44.0029.00
Cu0.060.05
Fe0.881.60
Mn0.470.92
* Kale nutrient content was obtained from the FoodData Central USDA database (USDA, 2019). Kohlrabi nutrient content was obtained from oven-dried leaves and then adjusted to 88% moisture content. The presented nutrient contents of the kohlrabi leaves are based on the values measured in the latest date of transplanting (DOT).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Smychkovich, A.; Hashemi, M. Yield and Nutrient Concentrations of Kohlrabi Bulbs and Leaves as Affected by Spring Transplanting Dates. Agronomy 2022, 12, 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040770

AMA Style

Smychkovich A, Hashemi M. Yield and Nutrient Concentrations of Kohlrabi Bulbs and Leaves as Affected by Spring Transplanting Dates. Agronomy. 2022; 12(4):770. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040770

Chicago/Turabian Style

Smychkovich, Alexandra, and Masoud Hashemi. 2022. "Yield and Nutrient Concentrations of Kohlrabi Bulbs and Leaves as Affected by Spring Transplanting Dates" Agronomy 12, no. 4: 770. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12040770

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop