Effect of Trichoderma spp. and Fertilization on the Flowering of Begonia × tuberhybrida Voss. ‘Picotee Sunburst’
1
Department of Phytopathology, Seed Science and Technology, Faculty of Agronomy, Horticulture and Bioengineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland
2
Department of Ornamental Plants, Dendrology and Pomology, Faculty of Agronomy, Horticulture and Bioengineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(7), 1278; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071278
Submission received: 17 May 2021
/
Revised: 16 June 2021
/
Accepted: 21 June 2021
/
Published: 24 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Biological Stimulants in Horticultural Crops)
Abstract
:The aim of the study was to assess the influence of Trichoderma spp. and different fertilization levels on the flowering and nutritional status of Begonia × tuberhybrida Voss. ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants. Before planting, the tubers were soaked in water or a mixture of spore of Trichoderma spp. (T. viride Schumach–Tv14, T. harzianum Rifai–Thr2, T. hamatum/Bonord/Bainier–Th15) in the form of a suspension for 24 h. The plants were fertilized every 7 days with the multi-component Peters Professional Allrounder fertilizer (20:20:20 + microelements) at a concentration of 0.0%, 0.2%, and 0.3%. Trichoderma spp. accelerated the flowering of the ‘Picotee Sunburst’ cultivar by 2.7–8.7 days, stimulated the development of buds and flowers in the plants and affected their size. The plants bloomed most intensively and had the biggest flowers after the treatment with the 0.3% fertilizer. Trichoderma spp. and the fertilization had no effect on the height of the plants and the number of shoots regardless of the fertilizer concentration, but they stimulated the development of leaves. Trichoderma spp. stimulated the production of chlorophyll. They did not affect the uptake of macroelements, but they stimulated the uptake of microelements (Zn, Fe, and B). The higher the fertilizer concentration was, the higher was the content of microelements in the plants.
1. Introduction
Due to ecological restrictions, plant producers have to limit the use of chemicals, including mineral fertilizers. However, it is known that the commercial production of very high quality plants is closely related to adequate fertilization, which needs to be optimal for a particular species and cultivar. Hence, the question: How to replace mineral fertilizers, which are commonly used all over the world, without compromising the quality of plants? The problem can be solved with biostimulats, which are defined as non-nutritional substances or microorganisms stimulating the growth and yield of plants and affecting their health. They have the potential to provide sustainable and economically beneficial solutions, which could introduce new approaches so as to improve crop efficiency [1]. According to the current state of knowledge, biostimulats regulate and modify physiological processes in plants, which results in their better growth and stress relief [2].
Fungi, including those of the Trichoderma genus, are used as biostimulats. Trichoderma are saprophytic fungi used for biological protection of plants [3,4]. Many species of the Trichoderma genus colonize the roots of dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. During this process, fungi wrap around the roots and form structures resembling appressoria to finally penetrate the root cortex. During the intercellular growth of fungi in the epidermis of the root and cortex, the plant cells surrounding the fungi are stimulated to deposit the cell wall material and produce phenolic compounds. This plant response limits the growth of Trichoderma spp. inside the root [5]. This interaction between the fungi and plants provides numerous benefits, whose diversity and significance have only recently been investigated. The interaction increases plants’ resistance to various biotic stresses through induced or acquired systemic resistance. It also increases plants’ resistance to abiotic stresses such as water deficit/excess, high salinity and extreme temperatures. The interaction also increases efficient use of nitrogen (N) by improving the mechanisms of N reduction and assimilation, and it reduces the overexpression of stress genes or the accumulation of toxic compounds during plants’ response to pathogens [6]. Fungi of the Trichoderma genus grow and proliferate rapidly. They can survive unfavorable conditions and stimulate the growth of plants and their defense mechanisms [4,7]. Trichoderma spp. can stimulate plant growth because they enable plants to absorb more nutrients and stimulate the production of vitamins and growth regulators [7,8,9]. Another benefit is the increased content of antioxidants in the fruit of the plants treated with Trichoderma spp. [9]. Moreover, investigations showed that some Trichoderma spp. significantly improved the fertility of the media treated with them. These observations encourage farmers to use them for crop production. The presence of fungi Trichoderma spp. in plants also induces their resistance. This phenomenon has been attributed to the biochemical exchange of information between the fungi and the root, involving numerous bioactive metabolites produced by biocontrol agents [7]. Trichoderma spp. can induce plants’ stronger response than the resistance induced by pathogens because they stimulate the production of hydrophobins, expansin-like proteins, secondary metabolites, and enzymes with direct antimicrobial activity such as peroxidase, chitinase, and glucanase. Apart from that, fungi of the Trichoderma spp. cause the accumulation of phytoalexins, i.e., organic chemical compounds which plants produce in response to the attack of pathogens [9]. Trichoderma spp. are aerobic organisms, so they develop best in the surface layers of the substrate [10]. Moreover, Benitez et al. [4] observed faster sporulation of Trichoderma spp. at increased access to visible light. Humidity is a very important factor influencing proper development of these fungi. According to Das et al. [11], the highest metabolic activity of the fungi can be observed at a humidity of about 80%.
For all these reasons Trichoderma spp. can be used as biostimulats in horticultural production to control soil pathogens, induce plants’ resistance or promote their growth. To date, the interaction of Trichoderma spp. with ornamental plants has been poorly investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the influence of these fungi and different fertilization levels on the flowering and nutritional status of Begonia × tuberhybrida Voss. ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants. Begonia × tuberhybrida blooms long and very profusely. It is a valued species planted in green areas and on balconies and terraces. Commercially available cultivars vary in height, growth character, color, and size of flowers. Of the species offered for summer compositions, Begonia × tuberhybrida is one of the most important.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Cultivation of Plants
The experiment was conducted during the growing season in 2018 and 2019, from April to September, in a greenhouse at the Marcelin Experimental Station, Department of Phytopathology, Seed Science and Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland. The study assessed the flowering and nutritional status of Begonia × tuberhybrida Voss. ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants treated with Trichoderma spp.
Tubers were planted in pots with a diameter of 20 cm, filled with a peat substrate (pH 6.5), enriched with multi-component Peters Professional Allrounder fertilizer (20:20:20 + microelements) at a dose of 1 g/1 L of the substrate.
Plants were cultivated at the temperature of 20–22 °C in day and 18–20 °C in night. On very warm and sunny days, the greenhouse was shaded. Relative humidity was maintained at 60%.
In each year of the study, there were six treatments with three replications and three plants in each. There were nine plants in each treatment. Before planting, the tubers were soaked in water or a mixture of spore of Trichoderma spp. (T. viride Schumach–Tv14, T. harzianum Rifai–Thr2, T. hamatum/Bonord/Bainier–Th15) in the form of a suspension for 24 h. The isolates came from a collection from the Department of Phytopathology, Seed Science and Technology.
After five weeks of cultivation, when the tops of shoots were visible above the surface of the substrate, the plants were fertilized every 7 days with the multi-component Peters Professional Allrounder fertilizer (20:20:20 + microelements). Water solutions of the fertilizer at a concentration of 0.0%, 0.2%, and 0.3% (20 mL per plant) were applied within the treatments in which both the tubers soaked in water and those soaked in a suspension containing a mixture of spores of Trichoderma spp. were planted.
2.2. Inoculum of Trichoderma spp.
An inoculum of Trichoderma hamatum, T. harzianum, and T. viride was prepared in laboratory of Department of Phytopathology, Seed Science and Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, in sterile plastic Petri dishes with a diameter of 90 mm. PDA (16 mL) medium was poured into each dish. When it solidified, a 5 mm disc of the nutrient medium overgrown with the mycelium of an appropriate isolate was placed in the central part of the plate. The disc had been cut from the circumference of a 10-day-old culture. Next, the cultures were incubated at 20 °C for three weeks; 20 mL of distilled water was poured onto the sporulating cultures, and the resulting suspension was poured into a flask. A spore suspension of the three tested Trichoderma isolates was prepared from a three-week culture. Trichoderma isolates were flooded with 20 mL of sterilized distilled water and scraped with a sterile glass rod. The suspension was filtered and the spore concentration of the three Trichoderma species in the mixture was adjusted to a concentration of 106 per mL using a hemocytometer under light microscopy.
2.3. Parameters
The percentage of root colonization by Trichoderma spp. was assessed, after the end of the cultivation experiment (after 24 weeks of cultivation). The earliness of flowering was assessed on the basis of the weighted average of the number of days from the planting of tubers to the appearance of the first colored flower bud. The evaluation of parameters began when three flowers were found on the plants. The number of flowers and buds, the flower diameter, the number of shoots and leaves, and the plant height were determined. The leaf greenness index was also measured with the Chlorophyll Meter-SPAD-502 apparatus. The content of macroelements (nitrogen—N, phosphorus—P, potassium—K, calcium—Ca, magnesium—Mg) and micronutrients (iron—Fe, manganese—Mn, zin—Zn, copper—Cu, boron—B) in leaves was also measured.
2.4. Macro- and Microelements Content
In each treatment, 10 cm long tops of leaves were collected for chemical analyses. The leaves were dried at a temperature of 45–50 °C and then ground. To determine the total content of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg, the leaves were mineralized in concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4). The following methods were used to measure the content of the nutrients: total N–Kjeldahl digestion with distillation in a Parnas–Wagner apparatus, P—the colorimetric method with ammonium molybdate (after Schillak), K, Ca, and Mg–atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS).
To determine the total iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu) content, the leaves were mineralized in a mixture of nitric (HNO3) and perchloric acids (HClO4) (3:1, v/v). To measure the sodium (Na) content, they were mineralized in concentrated sulphuric acid (H2SO4) [12]. After the mineralization, the Na, Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu content was measured with the AAS method (in a Carl Zeiss Jena apparatus).
2.5. Root Colonisation
At the end of the experiment, after 24 weeks of cultivation, the shoots were removed and the tubers were dug up with the roots. Then they were rinsed in water until the substrate was removed. Root samples were taken and cut into 1 cm long pieces. Samples were surface disinfected by immersion for 2 min in 2% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution. Root fragments (5 each) were placed in a Petri dish with PDA medium and incubated at 20 °C for 14 days. They were then placed on sterile filter paper and dried in a laminar airflow chamber. The percentage of root colonization was assessed on the basis of the number of roots colonized by Trichoderma spp.
2.6. Data Analysis
The results were analyzed statistically with two-way analysis of variance. Fertilization was the first-order factor, and Trichoderma spp. were the second-order factor (the mean values from the two years were taken into account). The experiment was set up in a Randomized Complete Block Design. The averages were grouped by means of the Duncan test at a significance level of α = 0.05. The program, Statistica version 13.3 was used.
3. Results
3.1. Root Colonisation
The study showed that 30.5%, 29.5%, and 30.0% of the root fragments of the Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants in the treatments treated with Trichoderma spp. were colonized by these fungi, regardless of the concentration of the fertilizer applied to feed the plants (Table 1).
3.2. Earliness of Flowering
The earliness of flowering of the Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants significantly depended on both the concentration of the fertilizer and Trichoderma spp. (Table 2). The plants, which had not been fertilized during the growing season, were significantly the latest to start flowering, no matter if they had been treated with Trichoderma spp. or not. The plants treated with the 0.3% fertilizer and supplemented with Trichoderma spp. were significantly the earliest to start flowering. The plants in the other treatments started flowering at similar times, i.e., 84.5–85.5 days after the tubers had been planted.
3.3. Height of Plants and Number of Shoots
The height of the plants and their number of shoots were not significantly affected by the fertilization or Trichoderma spp. (Table 2). Regardless of the fertilizer concentration, the plants grew to a height of 26.5–28.5 cm and had 1.6–2.5 shoots. The plants grew to a height of 27.2–28.0 cm and had 1.8–2.6 shoots, no matter if they had been treated with Trichoderma spp. during the growing season or not.
3.4. Number of Leaves
The number of leaves significantly depended on both the fertilization and Trichoderma spp. (Table 2). Regardless of the fertilizer concentration, there were significantly more leaves on the plants treated with the Trichoderma spp. There were, significantly, the fewest leaves on the plants which had not been fertilized or treated with Trichoderma spp. The most leaves were found in the plants treated with the 0.2% fertilizer and Trichoderma spp. fungi. The treatment of non-fertilized plants with the fungi of the Trichoderma spp. stimulated the development of leaves. However, the number of leaves on the plants from this treatment did not differ significantly from the number of leaves in the treatment in which the plants were grown without the Trichoderma spp. but supplemented with the fertilizer concentrated at 0.2% and 0.3%, as well as from the number of leaves in the treatment in which the plants were grown with the Trichoderma spp. and supplemented with the fertilizer at a concentration of 0.3%.
3.5. Leaf Greenness Index
The comparison of the results showed that the leaf greenness index depended significantly on the fertilizer concentration and Trichoderma spp. (Table 2). Regardless of the fertilizer concentration, there was a significantly higher value of the leaf greenness index in the plants grown with the Trichoderma spp. The lowest leaf greenness index was noted in the plants which had not been fertilized and grown without the Trichoderma spp. The highest leaf greenness index was noted in the plants which had been treated with the 0.2% fertilizer and grown with the Trichoderma spp. The treatment of non-fertilized plants with the Trichoderma spp. significantly increased their leaf greenness index. The leaf greenness index was significantly higher in the other treatments—it ranged from 55.0 to 55.8.
3.6. Number of Buds and Flowers
The number of buds and flowers on the plants of the ‘Picotee Sunburst’ cultivar significantly depended on the fertilizer concentration and Trichoderma spp. (Table 2). The fewest flowers developed on the non-fertilized and were grown without the Trichoderma spp. plants. The largest significant number of buds and flowers was noted on the plants supplemented with Trichoderma spp. and treated with the 0.3% fertilizer. The number of buds and flowers on the plants treated with the fertilizer concentrated at 0.2% and 0.3% but not supplemented with the Trichoderma spp. was directly proportional to the fertilizer concentration. The number of buds and flowers on the plants supplemented with the Trichoderma spp. fungi but not fertilized, as well as the plants treated with the 0.2% fertilizer, was similar to the number of buds and flowers on the plants grown without the Trichoderma spp. but treated with the 0.2% fertilizer.
3.7. Flower Diameter
The diameter of flowers developed by the plants of the ‘Picotee Sunburst’ cultivar significantly depended on the fertilizer concentration and Trichoderma spp. (Table 2). The non-supplemented and non-fertilized plants developed flowers with the smallest diameter. The plants grown with the Trichoderma spp. and treated with the 0.3% fertilizer had significantly the largest flowers. The plants grown without the Trichoderma spp. but treated with the fertilizer concentrated at 0.2% and 0.3% had significantly larger flowers than the non-fertilized plants. The non-fertilized plants supplemented with the Trichoderma spp. developed flowers with a similar diameter. The plants treated with the 0.2% fertilizer and supplemented with the Trichoderma spp. had flowers with a significantly larger diameter.
3.8. Content of Macroelements
The comparison of the content of macroelements in the leaves of the plants of the ‘Picotee Sunburst’ cultivar revealed significant differences only in the nitrogen content. The differences were influenced only by the fertilizer concentration (Table 3). The leaves of the non-fertilized plants had the lowest N content regardless of the fact whether the plants had been supplemented with the Trichoderma spp. or not. The treatment of the plants with the fertilizer concentrated at 0.2% and 0.3% increased the N content in the leaves by 20%.
3.9. Content of Microelements
The content of microelements, except Cu and Na, significantly depended on the fertilizer concentration and the supplementation of the plants with the Trichoderma spp. (Table 4). The Mn content increased along with the fertilizer concentration both in the plants supplemented with the Trichoderma spp. fungi and in those grown without the fungal supplementation. The lowest Zn content was found in the non-fertilized plants which were grown without Trichoderma spp. There was significantly higher content of this element in the leaves of the plants grown without Trichoderma spp. and treated with the fertilizer concentrated at 0.2% and 0.3% as well as in the plants supplemented with the Trichoderma spp. fungi but not fertilized or treated with the fertilizer at a concentration of 0.2%. The Zn content was significantly the highest in the leaves of the plants grown with the Trichoderma spp. and treated with the fertilizer at the highest concentration. The highest Fe content in the plants grown without the Trichoderma spp. was found in the treatment treated with the fertilizer at a concentration of 0.3%. There was a significantly higher content of this element in the plants grown with the Trichoderma spp. and treated with the fertilizer at a concentration of 0.2%. The Fe content was significantly the highest in the plants supplemented with the Trichoderma spp. and treated with the fertilizer at the highest concentration. The B content in the fertilized plants grown without the Trichoderma spp. increased along with the fertilizer concentration. There was a similar phenomenon observed in the plants grown with the Trichoderma spp. However, it is noteworthy that the B content in the non-fertilized plants was similar to the content of this element in the plants which had neither been fertilized nor supplemented with the Trichoderma spp.
4. Discussion
The study showed that 30.5%, 29.5%, and 30.0% of the roots of the Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants were colonized by the fungi of the Trichoderma spp. Janowska et al. [13] conducted a study on Freesia reflacta ‘Argentea’ and observed a similar percentage of root colonization by Trichoderma spp., i.e., 32% in underexposed to light plants and 33% in exposed to the assimilation lighting ones. The authors concluded that the high rate of root colonization with the fungi resulted from the successful application of the fungal suspension to the substrate directly above the tubers, because, as Kosicka et al. [10] indicated, Trichoderma spp. are aerobic organisms, so they develop best in the surface layers of the substrate. Moreover, Benitez et al. [4] noted that increased access to visible light accelerated the sporulation of Trichoderma spp. The rate of root colonization with these fungi may be very high. Pris et al. [14] conducted a study on Limonium sinuatum and observed that 100% of the roots were colonized by Trichoderma spp.
Early flowering is very important in floral production, because it gives a possibility to plan the flowering date. Our study showed that the Trichoderma spp. slightly accelerated the flowering of the Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants when they were treated with the fertilizer at a concentration of 0.2%. However, a higher concentration of the fertilizer accelerated the flowering of the plants by 8.7 days. Apart from that, the fungi of the Trichoderma genus stimulated the development of buds and flowers on the ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants and had influence on their size. The most intensive flowering and the largest flowers were observed after the plants had been treated with the 0.3% fertilizer. These results are consistent with the findings of the study by Janowska et al. [13], who conducted a study on Freesia refracta ‘Argentea’ plants grown in winter without assimilation lighting. The authors observed that Trichoderma spp. accelerated the flowering of these plants by about one week. Apart from that, additionally, the assimilation lighting of the plants of the ‘Argentea’ cultivar and supplementation with Trichoderma spp. stimulated the development of lateral inflorescence shoots and flowers. This effect was particularly noticeable in the plants cultivated with assimilation lighting. According to Pris [15], Trichoderma spp. also stimulated the flowering of Pachyphytum oviferum and Crassula falcata.
Our study showed that the height of ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants and their number of shoots were not affected by supplementation with Trichoderma spp. or fertilization regardless of the fertilizer concentration. However, the treatments stimulated leaf development. The most leaves were found on the plants grown with the Trichoderma spp. and treated with the fertilizer at a concentration of 0.2%. Additionally, the Trichoderma spp. stimulated the production of chlorophyll, as evidenced by the value of the leaf greenness index. According to Harman et al. [7], the treatment of plants with fungi of the Trichoderma spp. stimulates the growth of roots, results in longer and thicker shoots, larger leaf surface, higher chlorophyll content and yield, expressed by the number of flowers or fruits. However, according to Lorito et al. [9], the mechanisms responsible for these beneficial effects on plant growth have not been fully investigated and explanations are based on the suggestion that plant growth is stimulated by increased availability of nutrients.
In our study, the Trichoderma spp. did not affect the uptake of macronutrients by the ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants, but stimulated the uptake of micronutrients—Zn, Fe, and B. Their content increased along with the concentration of the fertilizer. According to data in available scientific publications, the Trichoderma spp. stimulate the uptake of micro- and macroelements by ornamental plants, but there is no clear answer to the question of which of them and under what conditions are most often absorbed by plants. Janowska et al. [15] observed that fungi of the Trichoderma spp. stimulated the P and Ca uptake by underexposed to assimilation lighting Freesia refracta ‘Argentea’ plants and the K uptake by plants cultivated with the assimilation lighting. Moreover, Trichoderma spp. stimulated the uptake of Fe, Mn, and Zn by both the exposed or underexposed to light plants of this cultivar. On the other hand, the plants exposed to assimilation lighting and supplemented with the fungi of the Trichoderma spp. took up Cu intensively. Alpa et al. [16] observed that arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) in treatment with Trichoderma viride stimulated the uptake of nutrients, especially P, by Helianthus annuus, because they improved the conditions in the root zone and thus affected the plants’ physiological and biochemical properties. According to Altomare et al. [17], Trichoderma spp. increase plants’ uptake of various elements, including Pb, Mn, Zn, and Al. They also increase plants’ ability to dissolve some nutrients in the substrate, e.g., phosphates, Fe3+, Cu2+, and Mn4+ ions, which are usually difficult for plants to access. According to Vinale et al. [5], both plant and fungal regulators may stimulate plant growth and nutrition. This observation was also made by Janowska et al. [18,19] in a study on Gladiolous hybridus ‘Black Velvet’ plants, and by Sajjad et al. [20] in a study on the ‘White Prosperity’ cultivar.
The results obtained indicate that the research undertaken is important not only for science but also for practitioners. The use of Trichoderma spp. results in early and abundant flowering plants.
5. Conclusions
The Trichoderma spp. accelerated the flowering of the Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ plants by 2.7–8.7 days. Trichoderma spp. stimulated the development of buds and flowers in the plants of the ‘Picotee Sunburst’ cultivar and affected their size. The plants bloomed most intensively and had the biggest flowers after the treatment with the 0.3% fertilizer. Trichoderma spp. and the fertilization had no effect on the height of the plants and the number of shoots regardless of the fertiliser concentration, but they stimulated the development of leaves. Trichoderma spp. stimulated the production of chlorophyll, as evidenced by the value of the leaf greenness index. They did not affect the uptake of macroelements, but they stimulated the uptake of microelements (Zn, Fe, and B). The higher the fertiliser concentration was, the higher was the content of microelements in the plants.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: R.A.; methodology: R.A. and B.J.; formal analysis: R.A., B.J. and B.R.; funding acquisition: T.K.; writing—original draft: R.A., B.J. and B.R.; writing—review & editing: R.A., B.J., B.R. and T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The publication was co-financed within the framework of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education program as “Regional Initiative Excellence” in 2019–2022, Project No. 005/RID/2018/19, financing amount: 12,000,000 PLN.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Yakhim, O.l.; Lubyanow, A.A.; Yakhin, J.A.; Brown, P.H. Biostimulants in plant science: A global perspective. Front. Plant. Sci. 2017, 7, 2049. [Google Scholar]
- Fleming, T.R.; Fleming, C.C.; Levy, C.C.B.; Repiso, C.; Hennequart, F.; Nolasco, J.B.; Liu, F. Biostimulants enhance growth and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and exhibit chemical priming action. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2019, 174, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whipps, J.M. Microbial interaction and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52, 487–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benitez, T.; Rincon, A.M.; Codon, A.C. Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 249–260. [Google Scholar]
- Vinale, F.; Sivasithamparam, K.; Ghisalberti, E.L.; Marra, R.; Woo, S.L.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma plant pathogen interactions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shoresh, M.; Mastouri, F.; Harman, G.E. Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 21–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Harman, G.E.; Howell, C.R.; Viterbo, A.; Chet, I.; Lorito, M. Trichoderma species–opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2004, 2, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yedidia, I.; Srivastava, A.K.; Kupalnik, Y.; Chet, I. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on microelement concentrations and increased growth of cucumber plants. Plant Soil 2001, 235, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorito, M.; Woo, S.; Harman, G.; Monte, E. Translational research on Trichoderma: From ‘Omics to the field. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2010, 48, 395–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kosicka, D.; Wolna-Maruwka, A.; Trzeciak, M. Aspects of the use of Trichoderma sp. in crop protection and distribution of organic matter. Kosmos 2014, 63, 635–642. [Google Scholar]
- Das, M.; Banerjee, R.; Bal, S. Multivariable parameter optimization for the endoglucanase production by Trichoderma reesei Rut C30 from Ocimum gratissimum seed. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2008, 51, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kamińska, W.; Kardasz, T.; Strahl, A.; Bałucka, T.; Walczak, K.; Filipek, P. The methods of analisis in chemical-agricultural station. Part II. In Analisis of Plants; IUNG: Puławy, Poland, 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Janowska, B.; Andrzejak, R.; Kosiada, T. The influence of fungi of the Trichoderma genus on the flowering of Freesia refracta Klatt ‘Argentea’ in winter. Hort. Sci. 2020, 47, 203–210. [Google Scholar]
- Prisa, D.; Sarrocco, S.; Forti, M.; Burchi, G.; Vannacci, G. Endophytic ability of Trichoderma spp. as inoculants for ornamental plants innovative substrates. J. Plant Pathol. 2013, 86, 169–174. [Google Scholar]
- Prisa, D. Trichoderma harzianum: Biocontrol to Rhizoctonia solani and biostimulation in Pachyphytum oviferum and Crassula falcata. World J. Adv. Res Rev. 2019, 3, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
- Alpa, Y.; Kuldeep, Y.; Ashok, A. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with Trichoderma and Pseudomonas fluorescens on growth, yield and oil content in Helianthus annuus L. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2015, 18, 444–454. [Google Scholar]
- Altomare, C.; Norvell, W.A.; Biorkman, T.; Harman, G.E. Solubilization of phosphates and micronutrients by the plant-growth-promoting and biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum Rifai 1295-22. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 2926–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Janowska, B.; Andrzejak, R.; Kosiada, T.; Kwiatkowska, M.; Smolińska, D. The flowering and nutritional status of Gladiolus hybridus cv. Black Velvet following a cytokinin treatment. J. Element. 2018, 23, 1119–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janowska, B.; Andrzejak, R.; Kosiada, T.; Kwiatkowska, M.; Smolińska, D. The flowering and nutritional status of Gladiolus hybridus ‘Black Velvet’ following gibberellin treatment. Hort. Sci. 2018, 45, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sajjad, Y.; Jaskani, M.J.; Ashraf, M.Y.; Qasim, M.; Ahmad, R. Response of morphological and physiological growth attributes to foliar application of plant growth regulators in Gladiolus ‘White Prosperity’. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 51, 123–129. [Google Scholar]
Table 1.
Root colonization percentage of Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ after application of Trichoderma spp. and different fertilization level. Means followed by the same letter for column–wise and row-wise do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
Table 1.
Root colonization percentage of Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ after application of Trichoderma spp. and different fertilization level. Means followed by the same letter for column–wise and row-wise do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
| Concentration of Fertilizer (%) | Trichoderma spp. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | |||||
| 2018 | 2019 | Mean | 2018 | 2019 | Mean | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 a | 27.5 | 33.5 | 30.5 b |
| 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 a | 30.5 | 28.5 | 29.5 b |
| 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 a | 29.0 | 31.0 | 30.0 b |
Table 2.
Earliness of flowering and quality of plants of Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ after application of Trichoderma spp. and different fertilization level. Means followed by the same letter for column-wise and row-wise do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
Table 2.
Earliness of flowering and quality of plants of Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ after application of Trichoderma spp. and different fertilization level. Means followed by the same letter for column-wise and row-wise do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
| Concentration of Fertilizer (%) | Trichoderma spp. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | |||||
| 2018 | 2019 | Mean | 2018 | 2019 | Mean | |
| Earliness of flowering (days) | ||||||
| 0.0 | 88.5 | 87.0 | 87.7 c | 87.5 | 86.5 | 87.0 c |
| 0.2 | 84.5 | 85.0 | 84.7 b | 84.5 | 85.5 | 85.0 b |
| 0.3 | 85.0 | 84.0 | 84.5 b | 78.0 | 80.0 | 79.0 a |
| Mean | 86.0 b | 85.3 b | 83.5 a | 84.0 a | ||
| Height of plants (cm) | ||||||
| 0.0 | 29.0 | 28.0 | 28.5 a | 28.0 | 27.5 | 27.7 a |
| 0.2 | 26.0 | 27.0 | 26.5 a | 26.5 | 27.0 | 26.7 a |
| 0.3 | 29.0 | 27.0 | 28.0 a | 27.0 | 28.0 | 27.5 a |
| Mean | 28.0 a | 27.3 a | 27.2 a | 27.5 a | ||
| Number of shoots | ||||||
| 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 a | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.2 a |
| 0.2 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.9 a | 2.5 | 1.8 | 2.1 a |
| 0.3 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.0 a | 2.8 | 2.2 | 2.5 a |
| Mean | 1.8 a | 1.9 a | 2.6 a | 2.0 a | ||
| Number of leaves | ||||||
| 0.0 | 8.2 | 9.0 | 8.6 a | 12.5 | 11.5 | 12.0 b |
| 0.2 | 12.5 | 11.0 | 11.7 b | 14.2 | 13.0 | 13.6 c |
| 0.3 | 12.0 | 11.0 | 11.5 b | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 b |
| Mean | 10.9 a | 10.3 a | 12.9 b | 12.2 b | ||
| Leaf greenness index (SPAD) | ||||||
| 0.0 | 40.2 | 42.6 | 41.4 a | 51.0 | 52.5 | 51.7 b |
| 0.2 | 55.5 | 56.2 | 55.8 c | 65.4 | 63.2 | 64.3 d |
| 0.3 | 55.7 | 54.2 | 55.0 c | 54.4 | 55.5 | 55.0 c |
| Mean | 50.5 a | 51.0 a | 57.4 b | 57.1 b | ||
| Number of buds and flowers | ||||||
| 0.0 | 4.2 | 3.5 | 3.8 a | 5.7 | 6.0 | 5.8 b |
| 0.2 | 5.5 | 6.0 | 5.7 b | 6.2 | 5.8 | 6.0 b |
| 0.3 | 7.0 | 6.5 | 6.7 c | 8.0 | 7.8 | 7.9 d |
| Mean | 5.6 a | 5.3 a | 6.6 b | 6.5 b | ||
| Diameter of flower (cm) | ||||||
| 0.0 | 11.0 | 10.5 | 10.7 a | 12.0 | 11.8 | 11.9 b |
| 0.2 | 12.0 | 11.5 | 11.7 b | 12.0 | 12.5 | 12.2 c |
| 0.3 | 12.5 | 11.0 | 11.7 b | 16.5 | 15.5 | 16.0 d |
| Mean | 11.8 a | 11.0 a | 13.5 b | 13.3 b | ||
Table 3.
Content of macroelements (% DW) in leaves of Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ after application of Trichoderma spp. and different fertilization level. Means followed by the same letter for column-wise and row-wise do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
Table 3.
Content of macroelements (% DW) in leaves of Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ after application of Trichoderma spp. and different fertilization level. Means followed by the same letter for column-wise and row-wise do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
| Concentration of Fertilizer (%) | Trichoderma spp. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | |||||
| 2018 | 2019 | Mean | 2018 | 2019 | Mean | |
| N | ||||||
| 0.0 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 3.5 a | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 a |
| 0.2 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.2 b | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 b |
| 0.3 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.2 b | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 b |
| Mean | 4.2 a | 3.8 a | 4.0 a | 4.1 a | ||
| P | ||||||
| 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 08 a | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 a |
| 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 a | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 a |
| 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 a | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 a |
| Mean | 0.9 a | 0.8 a | 0.8 a | 0.9 a | ||
| K | ||||||
| 0.0 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 3.1 a | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3.1 a |
| 0.2 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 3.6 a | 3.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 a |
| 0.3 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 3.7 a | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.8 a |
| Mean | 3.8 a | 3.2 a | 3.3 a | 3.7 a | ||
| Mg | ||||||
| 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 a | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 a |
| 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 a | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 a |
| 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 a | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 a |
| Mean | 0.4 a | 0.5 a | 0.5 a | 0.4 a | ||
| Ca | ||||||
| 0.0 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 a | 3.0 | 2.8 | 2.9 a |
| 0.2 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.8 a | 2.8 | 3.1 | 2.9 a |
| 0.3 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 a | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.0 a |
| Mean | 2.8 a | 2.9 a | 2.9 a | 3.0 a | ||
Table 4.
Content of microelements (MGk DW) in leaves of Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ after application of Trichoderma spp. and different fertilization level. Means followed by the same letter for column-wise and row-wise do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
Table 4.
Content of microelements (MGk DW) in leaves of Begonia × tuberhybrida ‘Picotee Sunburst’ after application of Trichoderma spp. and different fertilization level. Means followed by the same letter for column-wise and row-wise do not differ significantly at α = 0.05.
| Concentration of Fertilizer (%) | Trichoderma spp. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | |||||
| 2018 | 2019 | Mean | 2018 | 2019 | Mean | |
| Mn | ||||||
| 0.0 | 104.2 | 103.4 | 103.8 a | 105.0 | 104.6 | 104.8 a |
| 0.2 | 126.9 | 125.2 | 126.0 b | 128.3 | 125.2 | 126.7 b |
| 0.3 | 140.5 | 137.2 | 138.8 c | 138.3 | 140.2 | 139.2 c |
| Mean | 123.9 a | 121.9 a | 123.9 a | 123.3 a | ||
| Cu | ||||||
| 0.0 | 11.5 | 10.7 | 11.1 a | 11.0 | 10.9 | 11.0 a |
| 0.2 | 11.0 | 11.0 | 11.0 a | 10.9 | 11.2 | 11.0 a |
| 0.3 | 11.2 | 10.8 | 11.0 a | 10.9 | 10.9 | 10.8 a |
| Mean | 11.2 a | 10.8 a | 10.9 a | 11.0 a | ||
| Zn | ||||||
| 0.0 | 27.6 | 26.6 | 27.1 a | 29.1 | 28.7 | 28.9 b |
| 0.2 | 30.0 | 28.2 | 29.1 b | 30.0 | 31.5 | 30.7 b |
| 0.3 | 32.7 | 30.2 | 31.4 b | 35.3 | 34.9 | 35.1 c |
| Mean | 30.1 a | 28.3 a | 31.5 b | 31.7 b | ||
| Fe | ||||||
| 0.0 | 231.9 | 230.0 | 231.0 a | 230.0 | 232.2 | 231.1 a |
| 0.2 | 231.5 | 230.3 | 230.9 a | 260.4 | 258.4 | 259.4 c |
| 0.3 | 246.5 | 245.0 | 245.7 b | 273.0 | 269.0 | 271.0 d |
| Mean | 236.6 a | 235.1 a | 254.5 b | 253.2 b | ||
| B | ||||||
| 0.0 | 13.4 | 14.0 | 13.7 a | 22.6 | 23.4 | 23.0 c |
| 0.2 | 23.7 | 19.3 | 21.5 b | 26.6 | 27.3 | 27.0 d |
| 0.3 | 25.2 | 24.0 | 24.6 c | 28.2 | 30.0 | 29.1 e |
| Mean | 20.8 a | 19.1 a | 25.8 b | 26.9 b | ||
| Na | ||||||
| 0.0 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 a | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 a |
| 0.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 a | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 a |
| 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 a | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 a |
| Mean | 1.3 a | 1.2 a | 1.1 a | 1.1 a | ||
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Andrzejak, R.; Janowska, B.; Reńska, B.; Kosiada, T. Effect of Trichoderma spp. and Fertilization on the Flowering of Begonia × tuberhybrida Voss. ‘Picotee Sunburst’. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071278
AMA Style
Andrzejak R, Janowska B, Reńska B, Kosiada T. Effect of Trichoderma spp. and Fertilization on the Flowering of Begonia × tuberhybrida Voss. ‘Picotee Sunburst’. Agronomy. 2021; 11(7):1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071278
Chicago/Turabian StyleAndrzejak, Roman, Beata Janowska, Beata Reńska, and Tomasz Kosiada. 2021. "Effect of Trichoderma spp. and Fertilization on the Flowering of Begonia × tuberhybrida Voss. ‘Picotee Sunburst’" Agronomy 11, no. 7: 1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071278
APA StyleAndrzejak, R., Janowska, B., Reńska, B., & Kosiada, T. (2021). Effect of Trichoderma spp. and Fertilization on the Flowering of Begonia × tuberhybrida Voss. ‘Picotee Sunburst’. Agronomy, 11(7), 1278. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071278
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
