Next Article in Journal
Agronomic Biofortification of Significant Cereal Crops with Selenium—A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue “Pollinator Diversity and Pollination in Agricultural Systems”
Previous Article in Journal
VNT4, a Derived Formulation of Glutacetine® Biostimulant, Improved Yield and N-Related Traits of Bread Wheat When Mixed with Urea-Ammonium-Nitrate Solution
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pollen Paternity Can Affect Kernel Size and Nutritional Composition of Self-Incompatible and New Self-Compatible Almond Cultivars
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agronomy
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/agronomy11051014
agronomy-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nocturnal Bees as Crop Pollinators

by
Guaraci D. Cordeiro
1,*,
Rodolfo Liporoni
2,
Carolina A. Caetano
3,
Cristiane Krug
4,
Carlos A. Martínez-Martínez
5,
Herbeson O. J. Martins
5,
Renan K. O. A. Cardoso
5,
Fernanda F. Araujo
6,
Priscila C. S. Araújo
7,
Reisla Oliveira
8,
Clemens Schlindwein
6,
Eric J. Warrant
9,
Stefan Dötterl
1 and
Isabel Alves-dos-Santos
10
1
Department of Biosciences, Paris-Lodron-University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
2
Instituto Federal de São Paulo, Campus São Miguel Paulista, São Miguel Paulista 08021-090, Brazil
3
Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos 13565-905, Brazil
4
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental, Manaus 69010-970, Brazil
5
Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-901, Brazil
6
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Vegetal, Departamento de Botânica, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
7
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil
8
Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Horizonte 31270-901 Belo, Brazil
9
The Lund Vision Group, Department Biology, University of Lund, 22362 Lund, Sweden
10
Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2021, 11(5), 1014; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11051014
Submission received: 13 April 2021 / Revised: 10 May 2021 / Accepted: 15 May 2021 / Published: 20 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pollinator Diversity and Pollination in Agricultural Systems)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bees are typically diurnal but around 1% of described species have nocturnal activity. Nocturnal bees are still poorly studied due to bias towards studying diurnal insects. However, knowledge concerning their biology and role as crop pollinators has increased. We review the literature on nocturnal bees’ traits and their host plants, and assess the crop pollination effectiveness of this neglected group. Nocturnal bees have visual adaptations to cope with low light intensities, and floral scents are a key sensory cue used to find their host flowers. Nocturnal bees generally show high flower constancy, the ability to vibrate flowers, and high transfer rates of pollen grains to stigmas. The flowers visited by nocturnal bees range from small radial and zygomorphic flowers to large brush blossoms; moreover, they visit plants with different flowering strategies. Nocturnal bees are effective pollinators of regional fruit crops in Brazil, such as cambuci (Campomanesia phaea), guaraná (Paullinia cupana), cajá (Spondias mombin), and in North America of cultivated pumpkins (Cucurbita species). However, they most likely are pollinators of several other crops. Strategies to host high numbers of nocturnal bees around cropping areas should be taken, such as preserving adjacent native forests, restricting soil management, providing food resources beyond crop flowers, and avoiding light pollution.

1. Introduction

Pollination is an essential ecosystem service and is crucial for guaranteeing global food security [1], with its economic importance estimated at USD 235–577 billion annually [2]. Bees are the most important crop pollinators worldwide [3], with Apis mellifera being the main managed pollinator species for crops around the world [4]. However, several crops demand specific solitary bees to guarantee efficient pollination and fruit set [5,6,7], and indeed, an overall high diversity of native bee pollinators enhances crop yield [8,9].
Bees are typically diurnal but approximately 1% of described species (ca. 250) have crepuscular and/or nocturnal activity. Crepuscular bees fly pre-sunrise and post-sunset, and truly nocturnal bees fly all night or for most of the night [10,11,12,13,14]. This behavior has arisen independently in four of the seven bee families: Andrenidae, Apidae, Colletidae, and Halictidae [13,15]. It is hypothesized that these bees developed nocturnal habits to escape diurnal competition for floral resources and to avoid enemies such as kleptoparasites, which are less active at night [11,15,16,17].
Foraging at night and during twilight is thus likely to be beneficial, as flowers are often rich in pollen and nectar early in the morning before being exploited by diurnal flower visitors [18], as well as late into the evening before nocturnal visitors arrive, providing a “competitor free space” [12,16]. In addition, by mainly visiting plant species with abundant floral rewards available, they would spend little time searching for host plants [19,20].
Most crepuscular/nocturnal bees (hereafter referred to as nocturnal bees) occur in Neotropical regions and are widespread, mainly in South America [21]. The biology of nocturnal bees is poorly studied due to a preferential bias towards studying diurnal insects. One of the most studied and common nocturnal bee genera is Megalopta (Halictidae), which currently accounts for 32 species distributed from South Mexico to Argentina [22,23]. Megalopta bees build their nests in cavities within dead wood, and in some species more than one female per nest was recorded, suggesting a facultative social behavior [24,25,26]. The other abundant nocturnal bee genus, Ptiloglossa (Colletidae), has 55 described species occurring from the Southern United States to Argentina [21,27]. These bees dig tunnels in the ground to build their nests [28,29,30]. The genus Xylocopa has some records related to its nocturnal representatives, as X. tranquebarica from Asia [31]. Besides these, there are other genera of nocturnal bees, such as Megommation, Zikanapis, and Xenoglossa [15,32] (Figure 1). There are species with facultative nocturnal behavior that forage during the day but occasionally have also been reported at night, among them Apis dorsata, A. mellifera adansonii, and other Xylocopa species [12,33].
These bees visit a high number of plant species, among them crops [34]. The pollination efficiency of nocturnal bees was recently shown for Brazilian crops of different families, such as Anacardiaceae (Spondias mombin), Myrtaceae (Campomanesia phaea), and Sapindaceae (Paullinia cupana) [18,35,36,37], but they are potential pollinators of other crops as well [38,39]. Here, we review the literature on nocturnal bees: how they find flowers, their pollinator traits and host plants, and assess the crop pollination effectiveness of this neglected group. We then address perspectives on how to provide appropriate habitats to improve the presence of nocturnal bees around cropping areas to facilitate pollination.

2. How Do Nocturnal Bees Find Flowers in the Darkness?

Bees use visual (shape, brightness, and color) as well as chemical (scent) floral cues to find flowers and to obtain food resources such as nectar and pollen [40,41,42]. As nocturnal bees have a very restricted period of activity to collect their food resources (ca. 1–2 h), one might expect that these bees need to be very efficient at finding flowers. Compared to diurnal bees, nocturnal bees have several visual adaptations to cope with low light intensities. They typically have larger apposition compound eyes and ocelli [10,43,44,45], optical mechanisms for increasing light capture in dim light [10,13,44,46,47,48,49], and specialized neural mechanisms that enhance visual performance by boosting retinal signal reliability [50] and by summing photons in space and time [13,47,51,52]. Light intensity thresholds determine flower search behavior more than other abiotic environmental factors [11,53]. Moreover, nocturnal bees tend to visit flowers with a broad reflection spectrum that likely creates a high contrast white target against the dark backgrounds of the sky and vegetation [53,54,55,56].
In addition to visual adaptations for dim light, nocturnal pollinators often heavily depend on floral odors to find their host flowers [55]. Indeed, nocturnal bees tend to visit and are attracted by flowers releasing a strong perfume at night [20,39,56], with volatiles from various biosynthetic routes. For example, nocturnal bees are attracted to the strong scent of Campomanesia phaea (Myrtaceae) flowers, which is mainly composed of aromatic (2-phenylethanol and benzyl alcohol) and aliphatic (1-octanol and 1-hexanol) compounds [18]. The floral scents emitted by Paullinia cupana (Sapindaceae) and attractive as a mixture to nocturnal bee pollinators are, among others, the terpenoids linalool and (E)-β-ocimene, and the nitrogen-bearing compound phenylacetonitrile [36]. These available data demonstrate that strong floral scents composed of compounds widespread among flower scents [57] are a key sensory cue used by nocturnal bees to find their host flowers.

3. Traits of Nocturnal Bees and Their Host Plants

As diurnal bees, nocturnal bees depend on floral resources to survive and feed their offspring, and actively seek flowers from which to take up nectar and collect pollen. Some of the pollen grains thereby adhere to the pilosity of their body surface. These grains can subsequently be passively deposited on the stigma of conspecific flowers, completing the pollination process [58]. Nocturnal bees generally show high flower constancy since individual bees preferentially visit flowers of the conspecific species during a foraging flight, as observed in Myrtaceae [18,38,39,59] and Caryocaraceae [20]. Furthermore, nocturnal bees are able to vibrate flowers (Supplementary Material), which is a quite efficient mechanism for collecting pollen [33,60,61]. This behavior was even observed in plant species with non-poricidal anthers [18,39,59]. In one case, nocturnal bees have been shown to transfer higher quantities of pollen grains to the stigma of flowers than diurnal bees [18], and are sometimes more abundant floral visitors than diurnal bees [18,62].
Nocturnal bees explore different types of flowers. Some floral features certainly favor pollination or visitation by nocturnal bees, such as nocturnal anthesis, high light reflectance, and a strong perfume. However, the forms and sizes of flowers visited by nocturnal bees are quite variable. Among such flowers are large brush blossoms (e.g., Caryocar brasiliense) [20], small zygomorphic flowers (e.g., Paullinia cupana) [36,37], keel flowers (e.g., Machaerium opacum) [56], and disk flowers (e.g., Myrtaceae species) [18,39]. Nocturnal bees also visit plants with different flowering strategies, like those with mass (e.g., Plinia cauliflora, Machaerium opacum) or steady-state flowering (e.g., Campomanesia phaea, Eugenia pyriformis) [18,39,56,63].

4. Host Plants of Nocturnal Bees

Nocturnal bees visit a wide spectrum of wild and crop plants and they can efficiently pollinate some of them, such as Cambessedesia wurdackii (Melastomataceae) [62], Campomanesia phaea (Myrtaceae) [18], Paullinia cupana (Sapindaceae) [36,37], Machaerium opacum (Fabaceae) [56], Passiflora pohlii (Passifloraceae) [64], Trembleya laniflora (Melastomataceae) [33], and Cucurbita species (Cucurbitaceae) [65,66]. Several other species are visited by nocturnal bees, but there is still little information about their pollination efficiency. Among such species are Calathea insignis (Marantaceae) [67], Gustavia augusta (Lecythidaceae) [68], Parkia velutina (Fabaceae) [69], Ipomea species (Convolvulaceae) [70,71], Solanum species (Solanaceae) [30,67,72,73], and Eugenia, Syzygium, and Plinia species (Myrtaceae) [39].
Pollen analysis from brood cells of nocturnal bees, or from pollen attached to their bodies, has shown that these bees also visit several chiropterophilous (bat-pollinated) and sphingophilous (moth-pollinated) species [16,19,34,74]. However, in only a few cases has the role of nocturnal bees as pollinators of these plants been studied. In the bat-pollinated Cayaponia cabocla (Cucurbitaceae), they are potential pollinators [75], but in the bat-pollinated tree Caryocar brasiliense, they efficiently remove floral resources without contributing to fruit set [20]. In chiropterophilous and sphingophilous flowers that provide easily accessible flowers with abundant pollen and nectar, nocturnal bees seem to generally be poor pollinators due to their morphological mismatch [20].
Moreover, nocturnal bees are generalists with regard to their food resources, and highly opportunistic. For instance, Megalopta bees captured on field bioassays in guaraná crops carried only pollen grains of this crop on their body, but other individuals of the same species also carried pollen of other species, mainly Arecaceae and Euphorbiaceae species [36]. Analysis of brood cell provisions of two Megalopta species has revealed pollen of 64 plant species from 19 families [34]. Bees of Ptiloglossa also visit different night-flowering plants, but in one single brood cell a monofloral pollen load was found [20]. The Paleotropical bee species X. tranquebarica, which visits flowers throughout the night, seems to be a generalist, as it was found to feed on diurnal leftovers from 71 plant species [76].

5. Nocturnal Bees as Crop Pollinators

Our knowledge concerning crop pollination by nocturnal bees has increased recently (Table 1). Nocturnal bees have been recorded to be effective pollinators of regional crops in Brazil, such as cambuci (Campomanesia phaea-Myrtaceae), which are native to the Atlantic Forest, and guaraná (Paullinia cupana-Sapindaceae), native to the Amazon region. Both species are cultivated in their original habitat and both have regional economic importance [18,36,37,77]. Nocturnal bees most likely are pollinators of other Myrtaceae crops in the neotropics, for example of species in the genera Eugenia, Campomanesia, Myrcia, and Pisidium, which produce fleshy fruits. Flower opening before sunrise and an intense floral scent is common to all these species [18,38,39,59].
Nocturnal bees also pollinate flowers of cajá (yellow mombin, Spondias mombin-Anacardiaceae [35], which is an economically important and common fruit crop native to and cultivated in Northeast and Northern Brazil, and Central America. The genus Spondias includes other frequently used fruit crop species (e.g., S. purpurea, S. tuberosa) with similar blossoms, nocturnal anthesis periods, and floral resources [78,79], that also might be pollinated by nocturnal bees.
In North America, squash bees of the genera Peponapis and Xenoglossa display crepuscular flight activity that begins before sunrise. Xenoglossa is only active during twilight, whereas Peponapis also forages throughout the day [65,66,80,81]. Both species are oligolectic on species of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) and effective pollinators of cultivated pumpkins (Cucurbita foetidissima, C. maxima, C. pepo).
Nocturnal bees visit flowers of a broad spectrum of families (at least 40 families) [82], such as Fabaceae, an important group of cultivated plants, where they show the ability to open the keel, typical for flowers of this family [56]. Their capacity to vibrate flowers to collect pollen makes nocturnal bees potential pollinators of a range of cultivated plants with poricidal anthers, such as Solanum species (eggplant, peppers, tomato) [30,56,72,73].
This demonstrates not only the great potential of nocturnal bees as pollinators but also the necessity of extending observations in crops with nocturnal anthesis to analyze their contribution to pollination and food production in species of economic interest.

6. Requirements on Crop Areas to Host High Numbers of Nocturnal Bees

The biology of nocturnal bees is still poorly understood, and there is no possibility of acquiring nests commercially, as is possible for diurnal bees (e.g., Osmia, Megachile, bumblebees, stingless bees or honeybees), but some strategies to provide appropriate habitats to improve their presence around cropping areas will now be suggested (Box 1, Figure 2).
Box 1. Summary of nocturnal bee traits and needs in crop areas.
Traits that make nocturnal bees efficient pollinators
First floral visitors of resource-rich flowers
Abundant floral visitors
Generalists in terms of preferences for floral signals
Generalists that visit different kinds of flowers
Generalists in obtaining food resources
Transfer of high amounts of pollen to stigmas
Efficient buzzing of anthers
Visit plants with different flowering strategies (mass-flowering or steady-state)
Requirements for crop areas to host high numbers of nocturnal bees
Large patches of natural vegetation
Availability of several flower resources
Conspicuous floral advertisement (e.g., floral scent)
Appropriate nesting sites
Reduced light pollution
No pesticide application
Nocturnal bees typically nest around or within forest patches in the ground (e.g., Ptiloglossa, Zikanapis, Megommation) or in tree wood (Megalopta). Most crops known to be pollinated by nocturnal bees are surrounded by patches of native forest [18,36,37,59]. This indicates nocturnal bees’ affinity to diverse native habitats with available flowers and nesting sites nearby. In the context of fluctuating, or even disappearing resource environments, any sustainable practices that ensure a local diversity of flowers and nesting sites are essential, such as agroforestry management strategies. Moreover, if a crop can only offer pollen as a resource (e.g., Myrtaceae species) to nocturnal bees, it would be beneficial to provide other plants that also provide nectar, and vice versa. Furthermore, if the crop has a short blooming period, such as cambuci and guaraná, it is necessary to preserve further food sources beyond the crop flowering seasons [88]. Thus, future studies are needed to determine which wild plants are also able support nocturnal bees.
Based on these characteristics, crop producers should preserve native forest reserves adjacent to the cropping area as much as possible and restrict management of the soil, especially during the flowering season. For instance, nest aggregations of Peponapis and Xenoglossa are found near or even at the edge of pumpkin patches, and tilled soil disturbs their population and renders them less frequent in Cucurbita flowers [66,89]. Therefore, it is crucial to identify potential nests of nocturnal bees that build aggregations and to isolate the nesting site, to avoid movements by agricultural machines that could damage the nests. Moreover, the practice of applying pesticides should be avoided if the crop can potentially be pollinated with nocturnal bees.
Another factor to consider is light pollution. Nocturnal bees are traditionally captured by a range of different light-based traps, indicating that they are easily attracted by artificial white light and dark (UV) light [90]. Moreover, light is the most important factor controlling the activity of nocturnal bees at nests and flowers [53,54]. Thus, changes in natural light intensities, as might be caused by local light pollution, could affect their flight and pollination services. This so-called artificial light pollution at night (ALAN) is estimated to interfere with the nocturnal visits of pollinators to their host plants, reducing nocturnal visitation by up to 62% [91]. Moreover, light pollution can affect pollinator behavior, as seen in moths spending more time at artificial light sources than at flowers [92]. However, LED lamps have fewer negative effects, and tree cover can mitigate the effect of ALAN on nocturnal moth pollinators [93]. Therefore, even though more studies are necessary that investigate the effect of light pollution on nocturnal bee pollination, it is advised that local farmers should maintain artificial light sources as far as possible from orchards and crop areas, and keep their intensity at low levels, especially during twilight, since outdoor lighting can certainly disturb bees and deviate them from flowers.

7. Conclusions

As pollination is an essential service for world food security, we must understand and protect its agents, and this includes pollinators that have, to date, been relatively neglected, such as nocturnal bees. The role of nocturnal bees was, until recently, largely overlooked, since these bees were rarely seen or collected. However, as soon as nocturnal bees were studied in more detail, their importance as pollinators was determined to be much greater than previously reported. Long before the visits of diurnal bees, nocturnal bees are already in the flowers and have already contributed to plant reproduction. Thus, night-blooming crop species need to be reevaluated to determine whether nocturnal bees visit their flowers and if so, which species are visiting, and during which months and at which times during the night visits occur. It will also be necessary to investigate how these bees participate in the pollination of their hosts. Most plants mentioned visited by nocturnal bees also have diurnal anthesis and are also visited by diurnal bee species. Therefore, it is important to determine whether the pollination roles for nocturnal and diurnal species are complementary.
In this review, nocturnal bees were identified as effective pollinators of some crop species and potential pollinators of others. When attempting to take advantage of nocturnal bees as pollinators of crops, some precautions should be taken by farmers, such as soil management, provision of other food resources to local bees, and control of light pollution. In a world facing the challenges of climate change, habitat destruction, and biodiversity loss, there is an urgent need to rescue as many crop pollinators as possible around the globe, including nocturnal bees.

8. Outstanding Questions for Future Studies

Are there other crops, apart from those we currently know, that are pollinated by nocturnal bees?
During which months (or seasons) of the year are nocturnal bees active in crop pollination?
What is the contribution of nocturnal bees, both biologically and economically, to the pollination of crop plants?
Are the crop pollination roles of nocturnal and diurnal bees complementary?
How do scent, brightness, and color of flowers interact to attract nocturnal bees?
How does light pollution affect nocturnal bee pollination in crop areas?
Is there any level of artificial light that can actually increase/decrease flower visitation by nocturnal bees and perhaps influence yields?
How does the wavelength composition of artificial light (i.e., different colors) affect the foraging activity of nocturnal bees?
Apart from crops, which wild plants support nocturnal bees?

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/agronomy11051014/s1, Video S1: Ptiloglossa latecalcarata (Colletidae) vibrating flowers of Campomanesia phaea (Myrtaceae) before sunrise.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.D.C. and I.A.-d.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, G.D.C., R.L. and I.A.-d.-S.; writing—review and editing, G.D.C., R.L., C.A.C., C.K., C.A.M.-M., H.O.J.M., R.K.O.A.C., F.F.A., P.C.S.A., R.O., C.S., E.J.W., S.D., I.A.-d.-S.; supervision, S.D., I.A.-d.-S.; project administration, S.D., I.A.-d.-S.; funding acquisition, S.D., E.J.W. and I.A.-d.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CNPq (Grant No. PVE 401466/2014-0) to I.A.-d.-S., C.S., S.D. and CNPq (PQ 311935/2018-4), Universal (436095/2018-1), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG Universal, APQ-00713-17) to C.S.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Claudia Inês da Silva and Sidnei Mateus for helping in all our collecting field data. We are also grateful to farmers allowing us to perform the studies on their proprieties.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations. Open Working Group Proposal for Sustainable Development Goals; Full Report A/68/970; Open Working Group of the General Assembly on Sustainable Development Goals, United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Potts, S.G.; Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L.; Ngo, H.T.; Aizen, M.A.; Biesmeijer, J.C.; Breeze, T.D.; Dicks, L.V.; Garibaldi, L.A.; Hill, R.; Settele, J.; et al. Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nature 2016, 540, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Klein, A.; Vaissiere, B.E.; Cane, J.H.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Cunningham, S.A.; Kremen, C.; Tscharntke, T. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 2007, 274, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Aizen, M.A.; Harder, L.D. The global stock of domesticated honeybees is growing slower than agricultural demand for pollination. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19, 915–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Freitas, B.; Paxton, R.A. Comparison of two pollinators: The introduced honey bee Apis mellifera and an indigenous bee Centris tarsata on Cashew Anacardium occidentale in its native range of NE Brazil. J. Appl. Ecol. 1998, 35, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oliveira, R.; Schlindwein, C. Searching for a manageable pollinator for acerola orchards: The solitary oil-collecting bee Centris analis (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Centridini). J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Giannini, T.C.; Alves, D.A.; Alves, R.; Cordeiro, G.D.; Campbell, A.J.; Awade, M.; Bento, J.M.S.; Saraiva, A.M.; Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L. Unveiling the contribution of bee pollinators to Brazilian crops with implications for bee management. Apidologie 2020, 51, 406–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Garibaldi, L.A.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Winfree, R.; Aizen, M.A.; Bommarco, R.; Cunningham, S.A.; Kremen, C.; Carvalheiro, L.G.; Harder, L.D.; Afik, O.; et al. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honeybee abundance. Science 2013, 339, 1608–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Woodcock, B.A.; Garratt, M.P.D.; Powney, G.D.; Shaw, R.F.; Osborne, J.L.; Soroka, J.; Lindström, S.A.M.; Stanley, D.; Ouvrard, P.; Edwards, M.E.; et al. Meta-analysis reveals that pollinator functional diversity and abundance enhance crop pollination and yield. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Warrant, E.J.; Kelber, A.; Gislén, A.; Greiner, B.; Ribi, W.; Wcislo, W.T. Nocturnal vision and landmark orientation in a tropical halictid bee. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14, 1309–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kelber, A.; Warrant, E.J.; Pfaff, M.; Wallén, R.; Theobald, J.C.; Wcislo, W.T.; Raguso, R.A. Light intensity limits foraging activity in nocturnal and crepuscular bees. Behav. Ecol. 2006, 17, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Warrant, E.J. Nocturnal bees. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17, 991–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Warrant, E.J. Seeing in the dark: Vision and visual behaviour in nocturnal bees and wasps. J. Exp. Biol. 2008, 211, 1737–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Somanathan, H.; Borges, R.M.; Warrant, E.J.; Kelber, A. Visual ecology of Indian carpenter bees I: Light intensities and flight activity. J. Comp. Physiol. A 2008, 194, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wcislo, W.T.; Tierney, S.M. Behavioural environments and niche construction: The evolution of dim-light foraging in bees. Biol. Rev. 2009, 84, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wcislo, W.T.; Arneson, L.; Roesch, K.; Gonzalez, V.; Smith, A.; Fernandez, H. The evolution of nocturnal behavior in sweat bees, Megalopta genalis and M. ecuadoria (Hymenoptera: Halictidae): An escape from competitors and enemies? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2004, 83, 377–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Smith, A.R.; Kitchen, S.M.; Toney, R.M.; Ziegler, C. Is nocturnal foraging in a tropical bee an escape from interference competition? J. Insect Sci. 2017, 17, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Cordeiro, G.D.; Pinheiro, M.; Dötterl, S.; Alves-dos-Santos, I. Pollination of Campomanesia phaea (Myrtaceae) by night-active bees: A new nocturnal pollination system mediated by floral scent. Plant Biol. 2017, 19, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Roulston, T.H. Hourly capture rates of two species of Megalopta (Hymenoptera: Apoidea; Halictidae) at black lights in Panama with notes on nocturnal foraging by bees. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1997, 70, 189–196. [Google Scholar]
  20. Araujo, F.F.; Araújo, P.C.S.; Siqueira, E.; Alves-dos-Santos, I.; Oliveira, R.; Dötterl, S.; Schlindwein, C. Nocturnal bees exploit but do not pollinate flowers of a common bat-pollinated tree. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2020, 14, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ascher, J.S.; Pickering, J. Discover Life Bee Species Guide and World Checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). Available online: http://www.discoverlife:mp/20q?guide=Apoidea_species (accessed on 31 March 2021).
  22. Moure, J.S. Augochlorini Beebe. In Catalogue of Bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) in the Neotropical Region Online Version; Moure, J.S., Urban, D., Melo, G.A.R., Eds.; Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia: Curitiba, Brazil, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  23. Santos, L.M.; Melo, G.A.R. Updating the taxonomy of the bee genus Megalopta (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Augochlorini) including revision of the Brazilian species. J. Nat. Hist. 2015, 49, 575–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wcislo, W.T.; Gonzalez, V.H. Social and ecological contexts of trophallaxis in facultatively social sweat bees, Megalopta genalis and M. ecuadoria (Hymenoptera, Halictidae). Insectes Soc. 2006, 53, 220–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tierney, S.M.; Gonzales-Ojeda, T.; Wcislo, W.T. Biology of a nocturnal bee, Megalopta atra (Hymenoptera: Halictidae; Augochlorini), from the Panamanian highlands. J. Nat. Hist. 2008, 42, 1841–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Santos, L.M.; Tierney, S.M.; Wcislo, W.T. Nest descriptions of Megalopta aegis (Vachal) and M. guimaraesi Santos & Silveira (Hymenoptera, Halictidae) from the Brazilian Cerrado. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 2010, 54, 332–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Urban, D.; Moure, J.S.; Melo, G.A.R. Diphaglossini Vachal. In Catalogue of Bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) in the Neotropical Region Online Version; Moure, J.S., Urban, D., Melo, G.A.R., Eds.; Sociedade Brasileira de Entomologia: Curitiba, Brazil, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  28. Roberts, R.B. Biology of the crepuscular bee Ptiloglossa guinnae n. sp. with notes on associated bees, mites and yeasts. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1971, 44, 283–294. [Google Scholar]
  29. Rozen, J.G. Nesting biology of Diphaglossine bees (Hymenoptera, Colletidae). Am. Mus. Novit. 1984, 2786, 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sarzetti, L.C.; Genise, F.F.; Sánchez, V.M.; Farina, J.L.; Molina, A.M. Nesting behavior and ecological preferences of five Diphaglossinae species (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Colletidae) from Argentina and Chile. J. Hymenop. Res. 2013, 33, 63–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Keasar, T. Large carpenter bees as agricultural pollinators. Psyche 2010, 927463, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Michener, C.D. The Bees of the World, 2nd ed.; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2007; p. 953. [Google Scholar]
  33. Soares, N.C.; Morellato, L.P.C. Crepuscular pollination and reproductive ecology of Trembleya laniflora (Melastomataceae), an endemic species in mountain rupestrian grasslands. Flora 2018, 238, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Smith, A.R.; López-Quintero, I.J.; Moreno-Patiño, J.E.; Roubik, D.W.; Wcislo, W.T. Pollen use by Megalopta sweat bees in relation to resource availability in a tropical forest. Ecol. Entomol. 2012, 37, 309–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Carneiro, L.; Martins, C.F. Africanized honeybees pollinate and preempt the pollen of Spondias mombin (Anacardiaceae) flowers. Apidologie 2012, 43, 474–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Krug, C.; Cordeiro, G.D.; Schäffler, I.; Silva, C.I.; Oliveira, R.; Schlindwein, C.; Dötterl, S.; Alves-dos-Santos, I. Nocturnal bee pollinators are attracted to Guarana flowers by their scents. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Krug, C.; Garcia, M.V.B.; Gomes, F.B. A scientific note on new insights in the pollination of guarana (Paullinia cupana var. sorbilis). Apidologie 2015, 46, 164–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Silva, A.L.G.; Pinheiro, M.C.B. Biologia floral e da polinização de quatro espécies de Eugenia L. (Myrtaceae). Acta Bot. Bras. 2007, 21, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Cordeiro, G.D.; Santos, I.G.F.; Silva, C.I.; Schlindwein, C.; Alves-dos-Santos, I.; Dötterl, S. Nocturnal floral scent profiles of Myrtaceae fruit crops. Phytochemistry 2019, 162, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dötterl, S.; Vereecken, N. The chemical ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions: A review and perspectives. Can. J. Zool. 2010, 88, 668–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Milet-Pinheiro, P.; Ayasse, M.; Schlindwein, C.; Dobson, H.E.; Dötterl, S. Host location by visual and olfactory floral cues in an oligolectic bee: Innate and learned behavior. Behav. Ecol. 2012, 23, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rachersberger, M.; Cordeiro, G.D.; Schäffler, I.; Dötterl, S. Honeybee pollinators use visual and floral scent cues to find Apple (Malus domestica) flowers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 13221–13227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Warrant, E.J.; Kelber, A.; Wallén, R.; Wcislo, W. Ocellar optics in nocturnal and diurnal bees and wasps. Arthropod Struct. Dev. 2006, 35, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Greiner, B.; Ribi, W.A.; Warrant, E.J. Retinal and optical adaptations for nocturnal vision in the halictid bee Megalopta genalis. Cell Tissue Res. 2004, 316, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Somanathan, H.; Warrant, E.J.; Borges, R.M.; Wallén, R.; Kelber, A. Resolution and sensitivity of the eyes of the Asian honeybees Apis florea, Apis cerana and Apis dorsata. J. Exp. Biol. 2009, 212, 2448–2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Jander, U.; Jander, R. Allometry and resolution of bee eyes (Apoidea). Arthropod Struct. Dev. 2002, 30, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Greiner, B.; Ribi, W.A.; Wcislo, W.T.; Warrant, E.J. Neural organization in the first optic ganglion of the nocturnal bee Megalopta genalis. Cell Tissue Res. 2004, 318, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Somanathan, H.; Kelber, A.; Borges, R.M.; Wallén, R.; Warrant, E.J. Visual ecology of Indian carpenter bees II: Adaptations of eyes and ocelli to nocturnal and diurnal lifestyles. J. Comp. Physiol. A 2009, 195, 571–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Berry, R.P.; Wcislo, W.T.; Warrant, E.J. Ocellar adaptations for dim light vision in a nocturnal bee. J. Exp. Biol. 2011, 214, 1283–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Frederiksen, R.; Wcislo, W.T.; Warrant, E.J. Visual reliability and information rate in the retina of a nocturnal bee. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18, 349–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Warrant, E.J. Seeing better at night: Life style, eye design and the optimum strategy of spatial and temporal summation. Vis. Res. 1999, 39, 1611–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Greiner, B.; Ribi, W.A.; Warrant, E.J. A neural network to improve dim-light vision? Dendritic fields of first-order interneurons in the nocturnal bee Megalopta genalis. Cell Tissue Res. 2005, 323, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liporoni, R.; Cordeiro, G.D.; Prado, P.I.; Schlindwein, C.; Warrant, E.J.; Alves-dos-Santos, I. Light intensity regulates flower visitation in Neotropical nocturnal bees. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kelber, A.; Roth, L.S.V. Nocturnal colour vision—Not as rare as we might think. J. Exp. Biol. 2006, 209, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Borges, R.M.; Somanathan, H.; Kelber, A. Patterns and processes in nocturnal and crepuscular pollination services. Q. Rev. Biol. 2016, 91, 389–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Siqueira, E.; Oliveira, R.; Dötterl, S.; Cordeiro, G.D.; Alves-dos-Santos, I.; Mota, T.; Schlindwein, C. Pollination of Machaerium opacum (Fabaceae) by nocturnal and diurnal bees. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2018, 12, 633–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Knudsen, J.T.; Eriksson, R.; Gershenzon, J.; Ståhl, B. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot. Rev. 2006, 72, 1–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Alves-dos-Santos, I.; Silva, C.I.; Pinheiro, M.; Kleinert, A.M.P. Quando um visitante floral é um polinizador? Rodriguésia 2016, 67, 295–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Souza, M.A.D. Biologia Reprodutiva de Onze Espécies de Myrtaceae em Floresta de Terra Firme na Amazônia Central. Master’s Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia/Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  60. Buchmann, S.L. Buzz Pollination in Angiosperms. In Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology; Jones, C.E., Little, R.J., Eds.; Van Nostrand & Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1983; pp. 73–113. [Google Scholar]
  61. Oliveira, F.S.; Ribeiro, M.H.M.; Nunez, C.V.; Albuquerque, P.M.C. Flowering phenology of Mouriri guianensis (Melastomataceae) and its interaction with the crepuscular bee Megalopta amoena (Halictidae) in the restinga of Lençóis Maranhenses National Park, Brazil. Acta Amaz. 2016, 46, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Franco, E.L.; Gimenes, M. Pollination of Cambessedesia wurdackii in Brazilian campo rupestre vegetation, with special reference to crepuscular bees. J. Insect Sci. 2011, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Proença, C.E.; Gibbs, P.E. Reproductive biology of eight sympatric Myrtaceae from Central Brazil. New Phyt. 1994, 126, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Faria, F.S.; Stehmann, J.R. Biologia reprodutiva de Passiflora capsularis L. e P. pohlii Mast. (Decaloba, Passifloraceae). Acta Bot. Bras. 2010, 24, 262–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cane, J.H.; Sampson, B.J.; Miller, S.A. Pollination value of male bees: The specialist bee Peponapis pruinosa (Apidae) at summer squash (Cucurbita pepo). Environ. Entomol. 2011, 40, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Minter, L.M.; Bessin, R.T. Evaluation of native bees as pollinators of cucurbit crops under floating row covers. Environ. Entomol. 2014, 43, 1354–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Janzen, D. Notes on nesting and foraging behavior of Megalopta (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) in Costa Rica. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1968, 41, 342–350. [Google Scholar]
  68. Mori, S.A.; Boeke, J.D. Pollination. In The Lecythidaceae of a Lowland Neotropical Forest: La Fumée Mountain, French Guiana; Mori, S.A., Ed.; Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 137–155. [Google Scholar]
  69. Hopkins, M.J.G.; Hopkins, H.C.F.; Sothers, C. A Nocturnal pollination of Parkia velutina by Megalopta bees in Amazonia and its possible significance in the evolution of chiropterophily. J. Trop. Ecol. 2000, 16, 733–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Schlising, R.A. Sequence and timing of bee foraging in flowers of Ipomoea and Aniseia (Convolvulaceae). Ecology 1970, 51, 1961–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bullock, S.H.; Ayala, R.; Baker, I.; Baker, H.G. Reproductive biology of the tree Ipomoea wolcottiana (Convolvulaceae). Madroño 1987, 34, 304–314. [Google Scholar]
  72. Linsley, E.G.; Cazier, M.A. Some competitive relationships among matinal and late afternoon foraging activities of caupolicanine bees in southeastern Arizona. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1970, 43, 251–261. [Google Scholar]
  73. Shelly, R.T.E.; Villalobos, E.M.; Buchmann, S.L.; Cane, J.H. Temporal patterns of floral visitation for two bee species foraging on Solanum. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1993, 66, 319–327. [Google Scholar]
  74. Piechowski, D.; Dötterl, S.; Gottsberger, G. Pollination biology and floral scent chemistry of the Neotropical chiropterophilous Parkia pendula. Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Sazima, M.; Buzato, S.; Sazima, I. Cayaponia Cabocla (Cucurbitaceae) Parece Uma Espécie Quiropterófila. In Resumos do XLVII Congresso Nacional de Botânica; Nova Friburgo: Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 1996; pp. 407–408. [Google Scholar]
  76. Somanathan, H.; Krishna, S.; Jos, E.M.; Gowda, V.; Kelber, A.; Borges, R.M. Nocturnal bees feed on diurnal leftovers and pay the price of day-night lifestyle transition. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 8, 566964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lorenzi, H. Brazilian Trees: A Guide to the Identification and Cultivation of Brazilian Native Trees; Instituto Plantarum de Estudos da Flora: Nova Odessa, Brazil, 2002; p. 384. [Google Scholar]
  78. Nadia, T.L.; Machado, I.C.; Lopes, A.V. Polinização de Spondias tuberosa Arruda (Anacardiaceae) e análise da partilha de polinizadores com Ziziphus joazeiro Mart. (Rhamnaceae), espécies frutíferas e endêmicas da caatinga. Rev. Bras. Bot. 2007, 30, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Mitchell, J.D.; Daly, D.C. A revision of Spondias L. (Anacardiaceae) in the Neotropics. PhytoKeys 2015, 55, 1–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Fronk, W.D.; Slater, J.A. Insect fauna of cucurbit flowers. J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1956, 29, 141–145. [Google Scholar]
  81. Ordway, E.; Buchmann, S.L.; Kuehl, R.O.; Shipman, C.W. Pollen dispersal in Cucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae) by bees of the genera Apis, Peponapis and Xenoglossa (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Anthophoridae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 1987, 60, 489–503. [Google Scholar]
  82. Caetano, C.A.; Cordeiro, G.D.; Alves-dos-Santos, I. Plants visited by crepuscular-nocturnal bees. 2021. manuscript in preparation.
  83. Burgett, M.; Sukumalanand, P.; Vorwohl, G. Pollen species resources for Xylocopa (Nyctomelitta) tranquebarica (F.), a night-flying carpenter bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of Southeast Asia. Sci. Asia 2005, 31, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Araujo, F.F.; Araújo, P.C.S.; Schlindwein, C. Competition between native bees and introduced honey bees on flowers of Campomanesia pubescens. 2021; manuscript in preparation. [Google Scholar]
  85. Falcão, M.A.; Chavéz Flores, W.B.; Ferreira, S.A.N.; Clement, C.R.; Barros, M.J.B.; Brito, J.M.C.; Santos, T.C.T. Aspectos fenológicos e ecológicos do araçá-boi (Eugenia stipitata McVaugh) na Amazônia Central. I. Plantas juvenís. Acta Amaz. 1988, 18, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ferreira, G.A.C. Camu-Camu (Myrciaria dubia (Kunth) McVaugh) e Seus Polinizadores: Produtividade, Diversidade e Interações na Amazônia Central, Brasil. Master’s Thesis, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia/Pós-Graduação em Botânica, Manaus, Brazil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  87. Falcão, M.A.; Fereira, S.A.N.; Clement, C.R.; Santos, T.C.; Souza, R.M. Crescimento e fenologia de Araçá-Pera (Psidium acutangulum DC). Acta Amaz. 1992, 22, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Silva, C.I.; Pacheco-Filho, A.J.S.; Toppa, R.H.; Arena, M.V.N.; Oliveira, P.E. Seasonal and vertical distribution of floral resources and its implications for the conservation of pollinators. Flora 2021, 278, 151787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Bohart, G.E. Notes on the biology and larval morphology of Xenoglossa strenua (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Pan Pac. Entomol. 1964, 40, 174. [Google Scholar]
  90. Wolda, H.; Roubik, D.W. Nocturnal bee abundance and seasonal bee activity in a Panamanian forest. Ecology 1986, 67, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Knop, E.; Zoller, L.; Ryser, R.; Gerpe, C.; Hörler, M.; Fontaine, C. Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination. Nature 2017, 548, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Macgregor, C.J.; Scott-Brown, A.S. Nocturnal pollination: An overlooked ecosystem service vulnerable to environmental change. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 2020, 4, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Straka, T.M.; von der Lippe, M.; Voigt, C.C.; Gandy, M.; Kowarik, I.; Buchholz, S. Light pollution impairs urban nocturnal pollinators but less so in areas with high tree cover. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 778, 146244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Agronomy 11 01014 g001 550
Figure 1. Nocturnal bees: (A) Megalopta aeneicollis, (B) Ptiloglossa latecalcarata, (C) Megommation insigne, (D) Megalopta sodalis.
Figure 1. Nocturnal bees: (A) Megalopta aeneicollis, (B) Ptiloglossa latecalcarata, (C) Megommation insigne, (D) Megalopta sodalis.
Agronomy 11 01014 g001
Agronomy 11 01014 g002 550
Figure 2. Comparing a more (A) and a less (B) sustainable crop area for hosting high numbers of nocturnal bee pollinators. Adjacent natural areas to provide food (1) and nest (2) resources; a range of cultivated, native flowering species offer food beyond the crop flowering season (3); potential nesting sites of ground-nesting species (e.g., Ptiloglossa) should be identified and protected (4); soil disturbance, such as that caused by deep tillage, fire, and superficial movements in the area by agricultural machines should be minimized, at least during the flowering season (5); artificial light pollution at night (ALAN) near crop areas should be avoided (6).
Figure 2. Comparing a more (A) and a less (B) sustainable crop area for hosting high numbers of nocturnal bee pollinators. Adjacent natural areas to provide food (1) and nest (2) resources; a range of cultivated, native flowering species offer food beyond the crop flowering season (3); potential nesting sites of ground-nesting species (e.g., Ptiloglossa) should be identified and protected (4); soil disturbance, such as that caused by deep tillage, fire, and superficial movements in the area by agricultural machines should be minimized, at least during the flowering season (5); artificial light pollution at night (ALAN) near crop areas should be avoided (6).
Agronomy 11 01014 g002
Table
Table 1. List of crop plant families and species known to be pollinated (E = effective, P = potential pollination) by nocturnal bees; nocturnal bee genera that visit them; geographical occurrence; references (Ref.).
Table 1. List of crop plant families and species known to be pollinated (E = effective, P = potential pollination) by nocturnal bees; nocturnal bee genera that visit them; geographical occurrence; references (Ref.).
Plant FamilyPlant Species
(Popular Name)		Nocturnal Bee GeneraRole as PollinatorsOccurrenceRef.
AnacardiaceaeSpondias mombin
(cajá, yellow mombin)		Megalopta, PtiloglossaECaatinga-
Brazil		[35]
Spondias pinnata (wild mango)XylocopaPTropical Forest-Southeast Asia[83]
CucurbitaceaeCucurbita foetidissima (pumpkin)Peponapis,
Xenoglossa		EDry environments-Mexico/USA[81]
Cucurbita maxima
(pumpkin)		Peponapis,
Xenoglossa		EDry environments-Mexico/USA[80]
Cucurbita pepo (pumpkin)Peponapis,
Xenoglossa		EDry environments-Mexico/USA[65,66,80]
MyrtaceaeCampomanesia phaea (cambuci)Megalopta, Ptiloglossa, Megommation, ZikanapisEAtlantic Forest-
Brazil		[18]
Campomanesia pubescens
(gabiroba)		Megalopta,
Ptiloglossa		EAtlantic Forest,
Cerrado-Brazil		[84]
Eugenia brasiliensis
(grumixama)		MegommationPAtlantic Forest-
Brazil		[39]
Eugenia dysenterica
(cagaita)		PtiloglossaPCerrado-Brazil[39]
Eugenia florida
(guamirim)		MegaloptaEAmazon, Atlantic Forest, Caatinga, Cerrado-Brazil[59]
Eugenia involucrata
(cereja-do-Rio-Grande)		Megalopta, MegommationPAtlantic Forest-
Brazil		[39]
Eugenia neonitida
(pitangatuba)		PtiloglossaPAtlantic Forest-
Brazil		[38]
Eugenia punicifolia
(cereja-do-cerrado)		PtiloglossaPAmazon, Atlantic Forest, Caatinga, Cerrado-Brazil[38]
Eugenia pyriformis
(uvaia)		PtiloglossaPAtlantic Forest-
Brazil		[39]
Eugenia rotundifolia
(abajurú)		PtiloglossaPAtlantic Forest-
Brazil		[38]
Eugenia stipitata
(araçá-boi)		Megalopta, MegommationPAmazon, Atlantic Forest-Brazil[39,85]
Eugenia uniflora
(pitanga)		PtiloglossaPAtlantic Forest-
Brazil		[38,39]
Myrciaria floribunda (cambuí)MegaloptaEAmazon, Atlantic Forest, Caatinga, Cerrado-Brazil[59]
Myrciaria dubia
(camu-camu)		MegaloptaPAmazon-Brazil[86]
Plinia cauliflora
(jabuticaba)		PtiloglossaPAtlantic Forest,
Cerrado-Brazil		[39]
Psidium acutangulum (araçá-pera)MegaloptaPAmazon-Brazil[87]
Syzygium malaccense (jambo-rosa)PtiloglossaPAtlantic Forest-
Brazil		[39]
SapindaceaePaullinia cupana
(guaraná)		Megalopta, PtiloglossaEAmazon-Brazil[36,37]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cordeiro, G.D.; Liporoni, R.; Caetano, C.A.; Krug, C.; Martínez-Martínez, C.A.; Martins, H.O.J.; Cardoso, R.K.O.A.; Araujo, F.F.; Araújo, P.C.S.; Oliveira, R.; et al. Nocturnal Bees as Crop Pollinators. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11051014

AMA Style

Cordeiro GD, Liporoni R, Caetano CA, Krug C, Martínez-Martínez CA, Martins HOJ, Cardoso RKOA, Araujo FF, Araújo PCS, Oliveira R, et al. Nocturnal Bees as Crop Pollinators. Agronomy. 2021; 11(5):1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11051014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cordeiro, Guaraci D., Rodolfo Liporoni, Carolina A. Caetano, Cristiane Krug, Carlos A. Martínez-Martínez, Herbeson O. J. Martins, Renan K. O. A. Cardoso, Fernanda F. Araujo, Priscila C. S. Araújo, Reisla Oliveira, and et al. 2021. "Nocturnal Bees as Crop Pollinators" Agronomy 11, no. 5: 1014. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11051014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop