Next Article in Journal
Effects of Soft Rock and Biochar Applications on Millet (Setaria italica L.) Crop Performance in Sandy Soil
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating Combined Drought- and Heat Stress Effects in Wheat under Controlled Conditions by Dynamic Image-Based Phenotyping
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Chinese Milk Vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) and Rice Straw Incorporated in Paddy Soil on Greenhouse Gas Emission and Soil Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Forecasting Yield and Lignocellulosic Composition of Energy Cane Using Unmanned Aerial Systems

1
Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
2
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, College Station, TX 77843, USA
3
Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Weslaco, TX 78596, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(5), 718; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050718
Submission received: 24 April 2020 / Revised: 12 May 2020 / Accepted: 15 May 2020 / Published: 17 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Phenotyping for Resilient and Sustainable Crops)

Abstract

Crop monitoring and appropriate agricultural management practices of elite germplasm will enhance bioenergy’s efficiency. Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) may be a useful tool for this purpose. The objective of this study was to assess the use of UAS with true color and multispectral imagery to predict the yield and total cellulosic content (TCC) of newly created energy cane germplasm. A trial was established in the growing season of 2016 at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research Center in Weslaco, Texas, where 15 energy cane elite lines and three checks were grown on experimental plots, arranged in a complete block design and replicated four times. Four flights were executed at different growth stages in 2018, at the first ratoon crop, using two multi-rotor UAS: the DJI Phantom 4 Pro equipped with RGB camera and the DJI Matrice 100, equipped with multispectral sensor (SlantRange 3p). Canopy cover, canopy height, NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index), and ExG (Excess Green Index) were extracted from the images and used to perform a stepwise regression to obtain the yield and TCC models. The results showed a good agreement between the predicted and the measured yields (R2 = 0.88); however, a low coefficient of determination was found between the predicted and the observed TCC (R2 = 0.30). This study demonstrated the potential application of UAS to estimate energy cane yield with high accuracy, enabling plant breeders to phenotype larger populations and make selections with higher confidence.
Keywords: energy cane; NDVI; ExG; yield; total cellulosic content energy cane; NDVI; ExG; yield; total cellulosic content

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cholula, U.; da Silva, J.A.; Marconi, T.; Thomasson, J.A.; Solorzano, J.; Enciso, J. Forecasting Yield and Lignocellulosic Composition of Energy Cane Using Unmanned Aerial Systems. Agronomy 2020, 10, 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050718

AMA Style

Cholula U, da Silva JA, Marconi T, Thomasson JA, Solorzano J, Enciso J. Forecasting Yield and Lignocellulosic Composition of Energy Cane Using Unmanned Aerial Systems. Agronomy. 2020; 10(5):718. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050718

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cholula, Uriel, Jorge A. da Silva, Thiago Marconi, J. Alex Thomasson, Jorge Solorzano, and Juan Enciso. 2020. "Forecasting Yield and Lignocellulosic Composition of Energy Cane Using Unmanned Aerial Systems" Agronomy 10, no. 5: 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050718

APA Style

Cholula, U., da Silva, J. A., Marconi, T., Thomasson, J. A., Solorzano, J., & Enciso, J. (2020). Forecasting Yield and Lignocellulosic Composition of Energy Cane Using Unmanned Aerial Systems. Agronomy, 10(5), 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10050718

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop