Next Article in Journal
Recent Achievements and New Research Opportunities for Optimizing Macronutrient Availability, Acquisition, and Distribution for Perennial Fruit Crops
Next Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Benefits of Protecting Table Grape Vineyards against Trunk Diseases in the California Desert
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of the Genetic Diversity of the Breeding Lines and a Genome Wide Association Study of Three Horticultural Traits Using Worldwide Cucumber (Cucumis spp.) Germplasm Collection
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Optimal Combination of the Propagation Medium and Fogging Duration Enhances the Survival, Rooting and Early Growth of Strawberry Daughter Plants
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Cane Emergence Time, Bending, and Defoliation on Flowering and Yield in Primocane-Fruiting Blackberry

Agronomy 2020, 10(11), 1737; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111737
by Fumiomi Takeda 1,*, Ann Rose 1 and Kathleen Demchak 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agronomy 2020, 10(11), 1737; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111737
Submission received: 16 September 2020 / Revised: 20 October 2020 / Accepted: 27 October 2020 / Published: 7 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Trends and Advances in Research and Technology of Berry Crops)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In general, this is an interesting paper with a good justification for the work. However, the defoliation treatment referred to is not clearly described, thus it is difficult to understand exactly what the authors did and what they based their conclusions on. Additionally, although the English is good, there are numerous typos and partial sentences throughout the manuscript that make understanding difficult. Specific comments:

Lines 140-141 - Is this the defoliation treatment the authors refer to? The removal of buds below the bend? This is unclear, but central to the work, so must be clarified.

Line 164 - What were the main plots and subplots?

Line 175 - Unclear how Table 1 shows that PC emerging in latter half of April didn't reach trainable height until July

Line 175 - Example of partial sentence that obscures the meaning of what the authors are trying to say. This occurs throughout the m.s.

Figure 2 - Add month to x-axis DOY legend, since the authors present the data here in terms of month in the narrative.

Line 188-189 - So, is this the intact control for the defoliation treatment (i.e. "Occasionally, there were laterals inadvertently left unpruned.")? This is the only reference I could find to an intact treatment, yet this gives the decided impression that the "control" treatment was accidental. What am I missing here?

Line 215 - Doesn't Table 1 show these data? Or is Table 1 only for year 1 and this paragraph refers to Year 2? This isn't clear.

Line 219 - What is "...early and flush primocanes"?

Table 2 - Again, please clarify in M&M and throughout what the "Intact" treatment was and what the "Defoliated" treatment was. How many of each were sampled (what was "n")?

Lines 274-275 - This contradicts my understanding of what was meant by defoliation, which I though alluded to the removal of lateral buds below the bend. But here, the authors state that bending and defoliation increase lateral bud break along the cane, including below the bend. So now I don't know what defoliation is referring to.

Lines 285-290 - Incomplete sentences (another example) 

Author Response

Please see attached document that has response to both reviewers.  

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Methodology. Add the number of plants per treatment in each subplot.

Author Response

Please see attached document with our response to all questions and comments from the review team.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop