Next Article in Journal
Numerical Study on the Distribution of Rodlike Particles in Laminar Flows of Power Law Fluids Past a Cylinder
Next Article in Special Issue
A Flexible Lithium-Ion-Conducting Membrane with Highly Loaded Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles to Promote Charge Transfer for Lithium–Air Battery
Previous Article in Journal
Rheological Characteristics of Starch-Based Biodegradable Blends
Previous Article in Special Issue
Self-Healing of Recombinant Spider Silk Gel and Coating
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Studies on the Application of Polyimidobenzimidazole Based Nanofiber Material as the Separation Membrane of Lithium-Ion Battery

1
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National Yu-Lin University of Science & Technology, 123, Sec. 3, University Rd., Douliu 64301, Taiwan
2
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, 415, Chien-Kuo Road, Kaohsiung 80782, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Polymers 2023, 15(8), 1954; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081954
Submission received: 10 March 2023 / Revised: 13 April 2023 / Accepted: 19 April 2023 / Published: 20 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Functional and Conductive Polymer Thin Films III)

Abstract

:
Aromatic polyimide has good mechanical properties and high-temperature resistance. Based on this, benzimidazole is introduced into the main chain, and its intermolecular (internal) hydrogen bond can increase mechanical and thermal properties and electrolyte wettability. Aromatic dianhydride 4,4′-oxydiphthalic anhydride (ODPA) and benzimidazole-containing diamine 6,6′-bis [2-(4-aminophenyl)benzimidazole] (BAPBI) were synthesized by means of a two-step method. Imidazole polyimide (BI-PI) was used to make a nanofiber membrane separator (NFMS) by electrospinning process, using its high porosity and continuous pore characteristics to reduce the ion diffusion resistance of the NFMS, enhancing the rapid charge and discharge performance. BI-PI has good thermal properties, with a Td5% of 527 °C and a dynamic mechanical analysis Tg of 395 °C. The tensile strength of the NFMS increased from 10.92MPa to 51.15MPa after being hot-pressed. BI-PI has good miscibility with LIB electrolyte, the porosity of the film is 73%, and the electrolyte absorption rate reaches 1454%. That explains the higher ion conductivity (2.02 mS cm−1) of NFMS than commercial one (0.105 mS cm−1). When applied to LIB, it is found that it has high cyclic stability and excellent rate performance at high current density (2 C). BI-PI (120 Ω) has a lower charge transfer resistance than the commercial separator Celgard H1612 (143 Ω).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In order to mitigate climate change, it is a broad consensus among all countries to use a large amount of renewable energy. However, some renewable energy (e.g., solar and wind energy) has time-intermittent problems [1], so it is necessary to develop a suitable energy storage system for the grid. In this regard, electrochemical energy conversion and storage (EECS) systems are very promising owing to their high turnover efficiencies, fast response times, facile scalability, and freedom from geographical constraints [2]. Lithium-ion batteries’ high energy density and mature manufacturing process make them a popular choice for EECS [3]. Lithium-ion batteries mainly comprise four components, a positive electrode, a negative electrode, a separator, and an electrolyte. Lithium ions move back and forth between the two electrodes during charging and discharging. When charging, lithium ions are released from the positive electrode and transported to the negative electrode through the electrolyte layer. Currently, the negative electrode is in a lithium-rich state, and the positive electrode is in a lithium-poor state. The electronic compensation charge is supplied to the negative electrode through an external circuit to balance the charge [4]. The opposite is true when discharging. It is self-evident that the separator acts as a physical barrier in Li-ion battery devices, keeps the positive and negative electrodes out of direct contact, and houses the electrolyte to facilitate the shuttling of ions within the battery [5,6]. In lithium-ion batteries, the separator is closely related to safety, and the failure of the separator will bring severe risks to the battery [7,8]. A high-performance LIB separator should possess the following characteristics: uniform separator thickness to prevent concentration gradients, maximized porosity with mechanical integrity to enhance electrolyte absorption, and good mechanical properties to prevent contraction when subjected to crimping tension and shrinkage. Good thermal dimensional stability prevents the separator from shrinking at high temperatures, causing internal short circuits. Good electrolyte affinity provides higher rate performance, good chemical/electrochemical stability, etc. [9,10,11]. Currently, commercially available LIB separator materials are mainly polyolefins, which have poor electrolyte affinity, low porosity, and poor capacitance retention under high-power charging and discharging [12]. Unfortunately, polyolefins will shrink at high temperatures [13], which exposes the battery to the risk of thermal runaway [14]. Therefore, it is crucial to develop high-performance and safer separators.
Polyimide has diverse monomer types, simplicity of synthesis, and unique physical and chemical combinations, so it is widely used in many fields [15]. Wu systematically studied polyimides polymerized by four monomers and pointed out that more polar functional groups in the main chain can improve the wettability with LIB electrolytes [16]. Xia. et al. introduced benzimidazole groups into the polyimide backbone [17]. The benzimidazole (C=N: proton acceptor) and amine (-NH-: proton donor) groups can form hydrogen bonding with the carbonyl groups and demonstrate strong intermolecular interaction. The formation of hydrogen bonding is a helpful method for improving polymers’ thermal and mechanical properties [18] by increasing Tg and tensile strength [19].
The electrospinning technique is a process that can stretch a viscous liquid (e.g., polymer solution) into a continuous fiber with a diameter ranging from a few nanometers to a few microns by using an electric field force [20,21,22,23]. Liu. et al. processed polyimide into a nanofiber film using an electrospinning method. They applied it to a LIB to obtain ultra-high porosity, significantly improving the electrolyte absorption rate [24]. Wen. et al. showed in experiments that it is feasible to improve the mechanical properties of electrospun films by hot pressing [25].
This study used a facile method to synthesize benzimidazole-containing diamine monomer [26], introduce it into the polyimide main chain, and use solid intermolecular forces to enhance the thermal and mechanical properties of the polymer [17,18,19]. The electrospinning method was used to make the polymer into a nanofiber film with a controllable thickness, and the mechanical properties of the nanofiber film were improved by hot pressing.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All reagents used in this study were of ACS reagent grade and were used without purification. 4-Aminobenzoic acid (PABA) and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Polyphosphoric acid (PPA, 84 wt%), phosphorus (V) oxide (P2O5), N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc), and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were obtained from Acros Organics (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). 4,4′-Oxydiphthalic anhydride (ODPA) was from Alfa Aesar, Thermo Fisher Scientific Co. (Alfa Aesar, Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Waltham, MA, USA). Sodium bicarbonate and methanol were from Duksan Pure Chemicals Co. (Duksan Pure Chemicals Co., Ansan, South Korea). Both DMAc and dimethyl DMSO were purified by stirring overnight in the presence of calcium hydride to remove water, followed by distillation under reduced pressure.
The weight of the active material is between 14.4 mg and 15.0 mg, its weight fraction is 93.5%, and it is loaded on an aluminum foil with a diameter of 12.8 mm. The weight of the nanofiber film material after being cut into a diameter of 17 mm is between 0.80 and 0.86 mg.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Synthesis of 6,6′-bis[2-(4-Aminophenyl)Benzimidazole] (BAPBI)

Mix and stir 40 g of polyphosphoric acid and 5 g of phosphorus pentoxide until dissolved. Then, add p-aminobenzoic acid and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine and mix in a molar ratio of 2:1, stirring for 12 h at 200 °C. The reacted product was poured into 10 wt% sodium carbonate in a deionized aqueous solution to precipitate, and the precipitate was collected, washed with water, and then dried. The dried precipitate was dissolved in methanol, the filtrate was collected, and excess methanol was removed by vacuum drying to obtain the yellow product BAPBI (90% yield). The synthetic scheme is presented in Figure 1.

2.2.2. Preparation of BI-PI Polymer

BI-PI was synthesized using a typical two-step method. BAPBI (1.8758 g, 4.5 mmol) was fully dissolved in 17.5 mL of DMSO and DMAc (volume ratio = 1:1) solution, and then ODPA (1.3980 g, 4.5 mmol) was slowly added, and the stirring continuously for 12 h in N2 atmosphere to obtain a homogeneous and viscous PAA solution with a solid content of 15.4 wt%. Electrospinning was then performed using a syringe with a spinneret having an inner diameter of 0.686 mm (19 G) and an applied voltage of 20 KV. PAA was then injected at a 0.01 mL min−1 rate, and the distance between the needle tip and the collector was 20 cm. In the atmosphere, nonwoven PAA nanofiber membranes were subjected to a continuous heating program (120, 200, 250, and 300 °C for 2 h each, 350, and 400 °C for 1 h each). Eventually, the imidized BI-PI nonwoven PAA was hot-pressed at 200 °C and 50 kgf cm−2 for 30 min. The synthetic scheme is presented in Figure 2.

2.3. Characterization

Structural identification, thermal properties, and porosity have been detailed in previous reports [26]. The surface morphology of the fibers was observed using field emission electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-6701F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, TGA 4000, Perkin Elmer, Washington, MA, USA) was used to detect the thermal degradation temperature of the polymer, which was raised from room temperature to 800 °C at 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere. A dynamic mechanical analysis instrument (DMA, TA Q 800, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) was operated at 1 Hz from 100 °C to 450 °C at 5 °C min−1 in a nitrogen atmosphere. A mercury porosimeter was used to measure the film’s porosity and pore size distribution (AutoPore® IV 9520, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). A universal tensile machine (Al-7000-S, Gotech testing machines, Inc., Taichung, Taiwan) was used to measure the mechanical properties, and the test plates were cut into 150 mm × 5 mm and tested at a tensile rate of 12.5 mm min−1. The electrolyte absorptivity was measured by immersing the film in the LIB electrolyte for 30 min and calculated according to Equation (1) [27]:
E l e c t r o l y t e   u p t a k e = W 1 W 0 W 0 × 100 %
where W0 is the dry separator and W1 is the soaked one.

2.4. Electrochemistry Test

The separator material was cut into a circle with a diameter of 16 mm, soaked in the electrolyte (1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)/ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (1:1:1 wt%) + 1% vinylene carbonate (VC)) for 1 h, and placed in a glove box. The soaked separator material was sandwiched between two metal lithium sheets (Li/Separator/Li) with a diameter of 15.8 mm and assembled into a coin cell (CR2032). The AC impedance spectrum was obtained, and the open circuit voltage was measured from an electrochemical system (CHI600, CHI instrument, Inc., Austin, TX, USA). The alternating voltage amplitude was set at 10 mV, and the scanning frequency was 1 Hz–100 KHz to evaluate the electrochemical performance of the separator material. The ionic conductivity of the separator was estimated according to Equation (2), adopting bulk resistance (Rb) as the resistance, which was obtained from the EIS Nyquist equation [28]:
σ = d R b × A
where σ (mS·cm−1), Rb is the resistance in the high-frequency region, and d (cm) and A (cm2) are the ionic conductivity, membrane thickness, and membrane area, respectively. The diaphragm soaked in the electrolyte, lithium, and stainless steel (Li/Separator/SS) was assembled into CR2032. The linear sweeping voltage (LSV) method was performed at a scan rate of 10 mV s−1 at a voltage between 3 V and 5 V.
Half-cell tests of the LIB were performed by assembling lithium, separator, and LiFePO4 into a coin cell (CR2032). All battery materials were obtained from Ubiq Tech. Co., Ltd., Taoyuan, Taiwan. Stirring mixtures of lithium iron phosphate powder, PVDF, conductive carbon black (Super P), and carbon nanotubes with a weight ratio of 93.5:3:2.5:1 until uniform, coat them on aluminum foil and roll them after drying. The rolled electrode and lithium were cut into an electrode sheet with a diameter of 12.50 mm. The separator synthesized in the experiment was cut into a separator with a diameter of 17.00 mm by a knife and evaluated by a battery test device (CT2001, Lanhe, Wuhan, China). The separator’s performance in LIBs was compared with a commercial separator (Celgard H1612, Celgard, NC, USA). The voltage window was between 2.5 to 3.8 V, the rate test was set between 0.1 C and 2 C, and the cycle test was performed at 0.1 C.

3. Results

3.1. Properties of Electrospun BI-PI Separator

The thermogravimetric analysis in N2 (Figure 3a) demonstrates that BI-PI has four stages of weight loss at 120 °C, 500 °C, 600 °C, and 700 °C, respectively, and the Celgard film has only a single stage of weight loss at about 400 ℃. Figure 3a illustrates that BI-PI has excellent thermal stability Td5% up to 527 °C because of many aromatic structures in the main chain [29]. Compared with the Celgard H1612 polyolefin separator, BI-PI has high thermal stability. It is worth noting that the residual weight of BI-PI is as high as 73.69% at 800 °C, which is mainly due to the small proportion of imide functional groups and ether groups in the main chain of BI-PI [30]. In Figure 3b, it can be observed that there are two corresponding peaks of Tan δ, 395 °C, and 303 °C, respectively, and the main chain contains a soft segment, and the hard segment is the main reason for the two peaks of Tan δ. In the amorphous region of the polymer, the rigidity of the hard segment is relatively high, and it is not easy to move, while the soft segment is the opposite. The peak at 395 °C corresponds to the hard segment.
BI-PI has a slight weight loss at 120 °C, which is attributed to the adsorption on the surface of the electrospun fiber. The breaking of the imide ring and ether group between 500 °C and 600 °C causes weight loss. In this stage, gases such as CO, CO2, NH3, NO, and NO2 will release in the section, and the temperature at 700 °C is mainly caused by cracking on the benzene ring and imidazole ring [31,32]. The Celgard film material is a polyolefin, and at 400 °C, the bonding in the main chain is cracked, and C2H4 will be released.
The formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonding (H-bonding) between imidazole and the imide group’s carbonyl also reinforces the main chains’ rigidity, as shown in Figure 4 [33]. It can be seen that BI-PI has good thermal properties and can withstand the high temperature of 300 °C without softening, which is sufficient in the application of LIBs.
The peak at 303 °C is because the backbone of the molecular chain contains a highly polar group, which may have a strong interaction with small molecules (e.g., residual solvent or water), thereby affecting the movement of the molecular chain and causing the relaxation temperature to occur in advance [34]. There will be a Tg as high as 395 °C because the main chain contains a large number of aromatic rings, high rigidity of the molecular chain, and hydrogen bonds between imidazole and the carbonyl on the imide group [33,34,35], as shown in Figure 4, make it difficult to increase the movement of polymer molecular chains [17,33]
Table 1 lists various properties of BI-PI film and Celgard H1612 and compares them with commercial Celgard H1612 separators. The electrolyte is the medium for transporting ions in the battery, and the absorption rate of the electrolyte significantly affects the ion transmission, thereby affecting the rate of performance and internal resistance of the battery [34]. BI-PI has a high porosity of 73% under the electrospinning process, which provides more space to accommodate the electrolyte. Because the operating voltage window of LIBs is much higher than the range that the aqueous electrolyte can tolerate, organic ester solvents are usually used (e.g., Ethylene carbonate, etc.) to dissolve lithium salts. The main chain contains many polar functional groups (e.g., N-H), which can interact with the electrolyte’s organic solvent and produce a strong affinity—and this is why the electrolyte absorption reaches as high as 1454%. The contact angle test results of the electrolyte and the film are shown in Figure S1. The BI-PI separator’s high electrolyte absorption rate and high electrolyte affinity are the main reasons for its nearly 20 times higher ion conductivity than commercial separators [36]. The EIS test results of the SS/Separator/SS system are shown in Figure S2.
It is generally believed that LIBs separators must have some dimensional stability when subjected to external stress [6,37]. The battery cells will be subjected to continuous curling stress during assembly. To avoid the short circuit originating from the separator displacement resulting from pressure, the displacement of the diaphragm must be controlled within less than 2% under a stress of 1000 Psi (6.89 MPa). Electrospun membranes have high porosity and can accommodate many electrolytes. On the contrary, this will also reduce the integrity of the mechanical structure, and the mechanical properties are generally poor [38]. The mechanical property test results are listed in Table 2, the tensile strength of the hot-pressed film increased from 10.92 MPa to 51.15 MPa, and the dimensional stability under stress also increased. SEM images showed that the fiber morphology also changed after hot pressing. It is generally considered that when the temperature is higher than 100 °C degrees Celsius, the intermolecular hydrogen bond force will fail, and the molecular chain will move more freely. In this experiment, the hot-pressing temperature reached 200 °C, and a substantial stress of 50 Kgf was continuously applied for 30 min. It will cause the molecular chains of BI-PI polymers to be continuously affected by high temperatures and intense stress so that the hydrogen bond force between the chains will fail, and the molecular chains will move and slide more easily. Therefore, the molecular chains can be fully rearranged, and the intermolecular force (hydrogen bond force) is more compact after the temperature is cooled. The molecular chains are rearranged under hot pressing, resulting in more physical crosslinking sites than before hot pressing, increasing the force between electrospun fibers and significantly improving mechanical properties. This phenomenon is similar to the sintering process.
The SEM images in Figure 5a,b,d,e show the film’s surface morphology before and after hot pressing, and Figure 5c,f illustrate the cross-sectional shape of the film before and after hot pressing. Figure 5a,b demonstrate that the non-hot-pressed fibers of the film are independent and do not stick to each other. Figure 5c shows many pores between the fiber layers, and the fiber stacking distance is significant. After the hot-pressing process, the SEM image shows a completely different surface morphology from that before hot pressing. Figure 5d shows that the fibers oriented in the same direction are in contact with each other and stick together. Figure 5e shows the fibers oriented in different directions. There is also a stick at the intersection. The cross-sectional image of Figure 5f shows that the fibers are tightly packed, significantly reducing the gap between the fiber layers, and there is also a sticking phenomenon. These may be due to the pseudo-burning phenomenon caused by high temperatures and high-pressure stress at 200 °C for a long time, which leads to the easy transferring of stress between fibers and improves the mechanical properties of the electrospun film [25]. Figure S3 is the stress-strain diagram of the test.
The mercury porosimeter data in Figure 6 shows that the pore volume before hot pressing was 20.5 mL g−1, and the pore volume decreased to 1.9 mL g−1 after hot pressing. There is a 91% shrinkage of volume. Pore volume higher than 5000 nm decreased by 16.4 to 0.8 mL g−1, but the pore volume around 1000 nm did not change much from 2.0 to 0.66 mL g−1. It is because the types of pores in the electrospun film are mainly divided into two types: the pores formed by cross-stacking fibers in intercept directions, and this type of pore is about 1000 nm. Voids created between stacked layers can be larger than 5000 nm. The volume of voids reduced by the hot-pressing process belongs to the second type because the cross-stacking between fibers is more compact after hot pressing, significantly reducing the gap between the stacked layers (Figure 5c,f), which helps to reduce the film thickness. The separator has no electrochemical capacity contribution for batteries and will generate a specific internal resistance. Reducing the thickness of the separator helps to increase the volumetric energy density of the battery and reduce the internal resistance of the battery. Therefore, the proportion of the separator in the battery composition must be reduced to an appropriate thickness to improve the battery’s energy efficiency while maintaining the battery pack’s safe operation [37].

3.2. Application of BI-PI as Separators of LIBs

Figure 7a demonstrates the LSV sweep curves of BI-PI and Celgard H1612 from 3 V to 5 V (relative to the Li+/Li electrode). All LSV curves have a low background current at potentials below 4.5 V and a slight increase in current beyond 4.5 V due to the reaction between the stainless-steel electrodes and the electrolyte diaphragm [36]. It can be seen that BI-PI has excellent chemical stability in the electrolyte of LIBs.
The interfacial charge transfer resistance (Rin) between Li and the electrolyte layer is an important parameter that responds to the kinetics of electrochemical reactions [39]. Rin is closely related to the interface stability between the electrolyte layer and Li electrode, which will affect the cycle stability and rate performance of LIBs. Therefore, the compatibility of the membrane after absorbing the electrolyte with the lithium electrode can be studied by testing the EIS of the symmetric battery system (Li/electrolyte-absorbing membrane/Li). Figure 7b shows the Nyquist plots of BI-PI and Celgard H1612. The semicircle is present in all EIS spectra, illustrating the presence of Rin at the Li metal-electrolyte interface. From the EIS spectrum of Figure 7b, it can be found that the Rin of the BI-PI separator is 120 Ω smaller than the Rin 143 Ω of the Celgard H1612 separator. It is attributed to the BI-PI separator’s higher porosity and better electrolyte wettability. The pyrrole nitrogen of BAPBI on the main chain will create many defects at the lithium storage active sites [40]. In addition, the electron-rich nature of the imidazole ring interacts strongly with lithium ions [41,42]. These results make it easier for lithium ions to transport at the interface between the lithium electrode and the electrolyte layer, reducing the battery’s internal resistance and improving its rate performance.
Battery performance testing can comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of separators applied to LIBs. By testing in a Li/LiFePO4 half-cell, the BI-PI separator’s cycle life and rate performance can be evaluated and compared with the commercial separator Celgard H1612. Figure 8a shows a Li-ion battery’s first charge and discharge curves at a low current density of 0.1 C. The results show that both BI-PI and Celgard H1612 have a stable charge-discharge form, and the capacity of BI-PI (169 mAh/g) is slightly higher than that of Celgard H1612 (166 mAh/g), but overall they are similar. However, when the current density is increased above 1 C, the influence of the separator on the battery performance is significant.
Figure 8b shows the 21st charge-discharge curve of the Li-ion battery at a high current density of 2.0 C. It can be found that when the current density increases, the discharge capacity of BI-PI is 126 mAh g−1, which is significantly higher than that of the commercial separator (101 mAh g−1). It is because the BI-PI nanofiber film has high porosity, high ion conductivity, and low charge transfer resistance.
The rate of performance of the battery is charged and discharged at various current densities between 0.1 C and 2 C, and the discharge results of the rate of performance are shown in Figure 8c. At low current densities, the capacity of the two separators was similar. However, when the current density was increased above 1 C, the BI-PI nanofiber membrane gradually widened the capacity gap with commercial thin films, taking advantage of low transfer resistance, high electrolyte absorption, and high ionic conductivity. It can be seen that the BI-PI nanofiber film has an excellent rate of performance at a high current density.
Cycling stability is an essential parameter for evaluating battery life. BI-PI and Celgard H1612 were activated for 5 cycles at a current density of 0.5 C and then charged and discharged 100 times. Figure 8d shows the cycle test results. It can be seen that both separators exhibit good cycle stability. After 100 cycles, the capacity retention rate of BI-PI is 96%, and that of Celgard H1612 is 94%. BI-PI is slightly higher than the commercial separator, which may be due to the high electrolyte absorption, excellent interfacial compatibility, and high ionic conductivity in the lithium anode [43].
Summarizing the above results and discussions, the molecularly designed BI-PI has an excellent performance in thermal properties and successfully improved the mechanical properties of the nanofiber film through the hot-pressing process. The film has high electrolyte wettability, a high electrolyte absorption rate, and good rate performance at high current density. The separator has been proven suitable as a high-performance supercapacitor in previous work [26]. The results and discussion in this study show that the separator is also suitable for high-performance LIBs. In the future, we will further enhance the lithium dendrite growth in the separator to improve LIBs’ performance and life cycles.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the BI-PI nanofiber film was successfully prepared by electrospinning. It has excellent thermal stability with a Td5% temperature as high as 527 °C and a Tg as high as 303 °C, making it stable when the battery is overheated, causing no short circuit resulting from separator melting. The BI-PI nanofiber film is densified through the hot-pressing process, the mechanical strength is increased four times, and the dimensional stability is improved. The BI-PI film demonstrates good electrochemical stability from 3 V to 4.5 V. Due to the high porosity of 73% and a high electrolyte affinity, BI-PI film has a high electrolyte absorption rate of 1454% and a high ion conductivity of 2.02 mS cm−1. When applied to LIBs, it is found to have high cycle stability, excellent rate performance at high current density, and lower charge transfer resistance compared with commercial separator Celgard H1612. The above shows that polyimides containing benzimidazole in the main chain are promising separator materials for a new generation of high-performance LIBs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/polym15081954/s1, Figure S1: Contact angles of (a) Celgard H1612 (b) BI-PI with electrolytes; Figure S2: EIS curves obtained in SS/Separator/ SS system; Figure S3: Stress-strain curves of hot-pressed and non-hot-pressed films.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-Z.W.; methodology, K.-S.H.; formal analysis, Y.-H.L.; investigation, Y.-C.H.; writing—review and editing, K.-S.H.; supervision, Y.-Z.W.; funding acquisition, Y.-Z.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Sci. & Tech. council in Taiwan, grant number MOST 111-2221-E-992-030-.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable to studies that do not involve humans or animals.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Appreciation is expressed for the use of soft-matter TEM equipment belonging to the Core Facility Center, Micro/Nano Technology Division of National Cheng Kung University (NCKU), National Sci. & Tech. council, Taiwan, ROC.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fathabadi, H. Utilizing solar and wind energy in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 156, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dunn, B.; Kamath, H.; Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices. Science 2011, 334, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, J.; Duan, X.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yang, H.; Lu, B. Nature of extra capacity in MoS2 electrodes: Molybdenum atoms accommodate with lithium. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 16, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bicy, K.; Gueye, A.B.; Rouxel, D.; Kalarikkal, N.; Thomas, S. Lithium-ion battery separators based on electrospun PVDF: A review. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 31, 101977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Beard, K.W. Linden′s Handbook of Batteries; McGraw-Hill Education: Columbus, OH, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  6. Costa, C.M.; Lee, Y.-H.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, S.-Y.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Recent advances on separator membranes for lithium-ion battery applications: From porous membranes to solid electrolytes. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 22, 346–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pan, Y.; Chou, S.; Liu, H.K.; Dou, S.X. Functional membrane separators for next-generation high-energy rechargeable batteries. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2017, 4, 917–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, W.; Yuan, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Li, X. Porous membranes in secondary battery technologies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 2199–2236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Costa, C.M.; Silva, M.M.; Lanceros-Méndez, S. Battery separators based on vinylidene fluoride (VDF) polymers and copolymers for lithium ion battery applications. Rsc Adv. 2013, 3, 11404–11417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Stephan, A.M. Review on gel polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries. Eur. Polym. J. 2006, 42, 21–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Warner, J.T. Lithium-Ion Battery Chemistries: A Primer; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Guo, S.; Yu, L.; Li, Q.; Liu, Q.; Hu, X. Safer Lithium-ion batteries from the separator aspect: Development and future perspectives. Energy Environ. Mater. 2021, 4, 336–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Song, Y.-Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, J.-J.; Lin, C.-E.; Yin, X.; Sun, C.-C.; Zhu, B.; Zhu, L.-P. Fast assemble of polyphenol derived coatings on polypropylene separator for high performance lithium-ion batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 808, 252–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, X.; Jiang, X.; Ai, X.; Yang, H.; Cao, Y. A highly thermostable ceramic-grafted microporous polyethylene separator for safer lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 24119–24126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fink, J.K. Handbook of Engineering and Specialty Thermoplastics, Volume 1: Polyolefins and Styrenics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  16. He, L.; Cao, J.-H.; Liang, T.; Wu, D.-Y. Effect of monomer structure on properties of polyimide as LIB separator and its mechanism study. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 337, 135838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xia, Q.; Liu, J.; Dong, J.; Yin, C.; Du, Y.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, Q. Synthesis and characterization of high-performance polyimides based on 6, 4′-diamino-2-phenylbenzimidazole. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 129, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Luo, L.; Zhang, J.; Huang, J.; Feng, Y.; Peng, C.; Wang, X.; Liu, X. The dominant factor for mechanical property of polyimide films containing heterocyclic moieties: In-plane orientation, crystallization, or hydrogen bonding. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 44000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fong, H.; Chun, I.; Reneker, D.H. Beaded nanofibers formed during electrospinning. Polymer 1999, 40, 4585–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dzenis, Y. Spinning continuous fibers for nanotechnology. Science 2004, 304, 1917–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, K.-W.; Cho, W.-J. High-Performance IGZO Nanowire-Based Field-Effect Transistors with Random-Network Channels by Electrospun PVP Nanofiber Template Transfer. Polymers 2022, 14, 651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, H.; Shi, J.; Ning, X.; Long, Y.-Z.; Zheng, J. The High Flux of Superhydrophilic-Superhydrophobic Janus Membrane of cPVA-PVDF/PMMA/GO by Layer-by-Layer Electrospinning for High Efficiency Oil-Water Separation. Polymers 2022, 14, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhu, L.; Zhu, W.; Hu, X.; Lin, Y.; Machmudah, S.; Wahyudiono; Kanda, H.; Goto, M. PVP/Highly Dispersed AgNPs Nanofibers Using Ultrasonic-Assisted Electrospinning. Polymers 2022, 14, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, D.; Shi, C.; Huang, S.; Qiu, X.; Wang, H.; Zhan, Z.; Zhang, P.; Zhao, J.; Sun, D.; Lin, L. Electrospun nanofibers for sandwiched polyimide/poly (vinylidene fluoride)/polyimide separators with the thermal shutdown function. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 176, 727–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jiang, W.; Liu, Z.; Kong, Q.; Yao, J.; Zhang, C.; Han, P.; Cui, G. A high temperature operating nanofibrous polyimide separator in Li-ion battery. Solid State Ion. 2013, 232, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, Y.H.; Wang, Y.Z.; Tsai, M.Y.; Lin, H.P.; Hsu, C.H. Electrospun Benzimidazole-Based Polyimide Membrane for Supercapacitor Applications. Membranes 2022, 12, 961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhang, F.; Ma, X.; Cao, C.; Li, J.; Zhu, Y. Poly(vinylidene fluoride)/SiO2 composite membranes prepared by electrospinning and their excellent properties for nonwoven separators for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2014, 251, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cai, H.; Tong, X.; Chen, K.; Shen, Y.; Wu, J.; Xiang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, J. Electrospun polyethylene terephthalate nonwoven reinforced polypropylene separator: Scalable synthesis and its lithium ion battery performance. Polymers 2018, 10, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, M.Y.; Niu, H.Q.; Qi, S.L.; Tian, G.F.; Wang, X.D.; Wu, D.Z. Structure evolutions involved in the carbonization of polyimide fibers with different chemical constitution. Mater. Today Commun. 2014, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, S.; Hu, P.; Greiner, A.; Cheng, C.; Cheng, H.; Chen, F.; Hou, H. Electrospun nanofiber belts made from high performance copolyimide. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 015604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sroog, C.E. Polyimides. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1991, 16, 561–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hatori, H.; Yamada, Y.; Shiraishi, M.; Yoshihara, M.; Kimura, T. The mechanism of polyimide pyrolysis in the early stage. Carbon 1996, 34, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lian, M.; Zheng, F.; Wu, Q.; Lu, X.; Lu, Q. Incorporating bis-benzimidazole into polyimide chains for effectively improving thermal resistance and dimensional stability. Polym. Int. 2019, 69, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nikol’skii, O.; Ponomarev, I.; Perov, N.; Martirosov, V. Acoustic, dielectric, and mechanical properties of a new rigid-rod poly (heteroarylene). Acoust. Phys. 2003, 49, 704–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ahn, T.-K.; Kim, M.; Choe, S. Hydrogen-Bonding Strength in the Blends of Polybenzimidazole with BTDA- and DSDA-Based Polyimides. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 3369–3374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pai, J.-Y.; Hsieh, C.-T.; Lee, C.-H.; Wang, J.-A.; Ku, H.-Y.; Huang, C.-L.; Hardwick, L.J.; Hu, C.-C. Engineering of electrospun polyimide separators for electrical double-layer capacitors and lithium-ion cells. J. Power Sources 2021, 482, 229054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Arora, P.; Zhang, Z.J. Battery separators. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 4419–4462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rao, M.; Geng, X.; Liao, Y.; Hu, S.; Li, W. Preparation and performance of gel polymer electrolyte based on electrospun polymer membrane and ionic liquid for lithium ion battery. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 399–400, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lu, Y.; Tu, Z.; Archer, L.A. Stable lithium electrodeposition in liquid and nanoporous solid electrolytes. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, X.; Zhang, B.; Wu, Y.; Chen, J.; Fang, M.; Wang, L.; Wang, L. The effects of polybenzimidazole nanofiber separator on the safety and performance of lithium-ion batteries: Characterization and analysis from the perspective of mechanism. J. Power Sources 2020, 475, 228624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nie, P.; Liu, X.; Fu, R.; Wu, Y.; Jiang, J.; Dou, H.; Zhang, X. Mesoporous Silicon Anodes by Using Polybenzimidazole Derived Pyrrolic N-Enriched Carbon toward High-Energy Li-Ion Batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hussain, A.; Li, D.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Li, X. Porous membrane with improved dendrite resistance for high-performance lithium metal-based battery. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 605, 118108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhu, M.; Wu, J.; Liu, B.; Zhong, W.-H.; Lan, J.; Yang, X.; Sui, G. Multifunctional polymer electrolyte improving stability of electrode-electrolyte interface in lithium metal battery under high voltage. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 588, 117194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of BAPBI synthesis.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of BAPBI synthesis.
Polymers 15 01954 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of BI-PI preparation.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of BI-PI preparation.
Polymers 15 01954 g002
Figure 3. (a) TGA thermograms of BI-PI and Celgard H1612 in nitrogen. (b) DMA thermogram of BI-PI.
Figure 3. (a) TGA thermograms of BI-PI and Celgard H1612 in nitrogen. (b) DMA thermogram of BI-PI.
Polymers 15 01954 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of intermolecular H-bonding of BI-PI.
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of intermolecular H-bonding of BI-PI.
Polymers 15 01954 g004
Figure 5. Morphologies of non-hot-pressed BI-PI separator membrane (a,b) surface, (c) cross-section type, hot-pressed one (d,e) surface, and (f) cross-section.
Figure 5. Morphologies of non-hot-pressed BI-PI separator membrane (a,b) surface, (c) cross-section type, hot-pressed one (d,e) surface, and (f) cross-section.
Polymers 15 01954 g005
Figure 6. Cumulative pore volume distribution of films before and after hot pressing by mercury porosimetry.
Figure 6. Cumulative pore volume distribution of films before and after hot pressing by mercury porosimetry.
Polymers 15 01954 g006
Figure 7. (a) LSV curves of Li/Separator/SS measured at a rate of 10 mV s−1 in the range of 3 V to 5 V (b) Nyquist plots obtained under Li/Separator/Li system.
Figure 7. (a) LSV curves of Li/Separator/SS measured at a rate of 10 mV s−1 in the range of 3 V to 5 V (b) Nyquist plots obtained under Li/Separator/Li system.
Polymers 15 01954 g007
Figure 8. Charge-discharge curves of LiFePO4/Li half-cell system at (a) the first cycle at 0.1 C, (b) the 21st cycle at 2.0 C, (c) capacity at different current densities, (d) cycle stability test at 0.5 C.
Figure 8. Charge-discharge curves of LiFePO4/Li half-cell system at (a) the first cycle at 0.1 C, (b) the 21st cycle at 2.0 C, (c) capacity at different current densities, (d) cycle stability test at 0.5 C.
Polymers 15 01954 g008
Table 1. Comparison of BI-PI electrospun film and commercial Celgard H1612 separator.
Table 1. Comparison of BI-PI electrospun film and commercial Celgard H1612 separator.
BI-PICelgard H1612
Thickness (μm)5016
Porosity (%)7344
Electrolyte uptake (%)1454101
Ionic conductivity (mS cm−1)2.020.105
Table 2. Mechanical properties of BI-PI NFMS.
Table 2. Mechanical properties of BI-PI NFMS.
Tensile Modulus (MPa)Tensile Strength (MPa)Elongation under 1000 Psi Stress (%)
Non-hot-pressed171 ± 5.7710.92 ± 0.973.64 ± 0.21
Hot-pressed763 ± 22.0151.15 ± 1.610.78 ± 0.02
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, Y.-H.; Huang, Y.-C.; Wang, Y.-Z.; Ho, K.-S. Studies on the Application of Polyimidobenzimidazole Based Nanofiber Material as the Separation Membrane of Lithium-Ion Battery. Polymers 2023, 15, 1954. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081954

AMA Style

Lu Y-H, Huang Y-C, Wang Y-Z, Ho K-S. Studies on the Application of Polyimidobenzimidazole Based Nanofiber Material as the Separation Membrane of Lithium-Ion Battery. Polymers. 2023; 15(8):1954. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081954

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Yu-Hsiang, Yu-Chang Huang, Yen-Zen Wang, and Ko-Shan Ho. 2023. "Studies on the Application of Polyimidobenzimidazole Based Nanofiber Material as the Separation Membrane of Lithium-Ion Battery" Polymers 15, no. 8: 1954. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15081954

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop